Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-10-27

Torino v Como

TorinoHome
1–3
ComoAway
1.011.95expected goals
0.911.85xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (1.01 – 1.95 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Torino
Como
Possession (share of passes)
28.1%71.9%
Duels
5452
Duels won
44.4%57.7%
Aerial duels
3030
Aerial duels won
1020
Successful dribbles
82
Passes
296759
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Torino above the line, Como below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.751.502.25Rafik Belghali — save, 0.09 xGJacobo Ramón — miss, 0.04 xGArdian Ismajli — miss, 0.03 xGTasos Douvikas — miss, 0.04 xGNikola Vlasic — save, 0.06 xGNikola Vlasic — miss, 0.02 xGGiovanni Simeone — save, 0.07 xGChé Adams — goal, 0.21 xGYan Couto — save, 0.03 xGTasos Douvikas — miss, 0.55 xGJacobo Ramón — save, 0.11 xGLucas da Cunha — miss, 0.06 xGNico Paz — save, 0.06 xGMaxence Caqueret — save, 0.05 xGLuis Milla — miss, 0.03 xGNico Paz — save, 0.09 xGMaxence Caqueret — post, 0.07 xGRafik Belghali — save, 0.11 xGGiovanni Simeone — save, 0.19 xGNico Paz — save, 0.03 xGGiovanni Simeone — miss, 0.02 xGNikola Vlasic — miss, 0.11 xGNico Paz — miss, 0.04 xGGvidas Gineitis — save, 0.11 xGJacobo Ramón — goal, 0.07 xGNico Paz — miss, 0.13 xGLucas da Cunha — save, 0.06 xGNico Paz — goal, 0.11 xGMartin Baturina — goal, 0.38 xG1.011.95Rafik Belghali — save, 0.09 xGOTNikola Vlasic — save, 0.20 xGOTGiovanni Simeone — save, 0.08 xGOTChé Adams — goal, 0.26 xGOTYan Couto — save, 0.03 xGOTJacobo Ramón — save, 0.12 xGOTNico Paz — save, 0.12 xGOTMaxence Caqueret — save, 0.08 xGOTNico Paz — save, 0.23 xGOTRafik Belghali — save, 0.11 xGOTGiovanni Simeone — save, 0.06 xGOTNico Paz — save, 0.02 xGOTGvidas Gineitis — save, 0.11 xGOTJacobo Ramón — goal, 0.17 xGOTLucas da Cunha — save, 0.04 xGOTNico Paz — goal, 0.17 xGOTMartin Baturina — goal, 0.87 xGOT0.911.850'15'30'45'60'75'90'
TorinoComosolid = xG29 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Torino
Como

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Torino or Como got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 4 of 4 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Torino

The question
When Torino has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Torino's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 37.0% of the time on the ball37%Progression: 38.9% of the time on the ball39%Chance creation: 21.7% of the time on the ball22%Attacking transition: 2.4% of the time on the ball39%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up37.0%
Progression38.9%
Chance creation21.7%
Attacking transition2.4%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Torino spends most of its time on the ball (39% of its time on the ball).

Como

The question
When Como has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Como's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 12.0% of the time on the ball12%Progression: 53.6% of the time on the ball54%Chance creation: 32.2% of the time on the ball32%Attacking transition: 2.3% of the time on the ball54%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up12.0%
Progression53.6%
Chance creation32.2%
Attacking transition2.3%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Como spends most of its time on the ball (54% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Torino
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Como
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Torino — 475 touches
Como — 909 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Torino

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Torino actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
296
ACTIONS
6%6%16%9%7%5%8%8%8%10%4%2%1%3%6%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
72
ACTIONS
1%1%8%19%3%7%8%15%10%12%1%4%4%1%3%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (14.1% of all actions). 63% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 37% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 42% defensive, 42% middle, 15% attacking.

Como

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Como actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
759
ACTIONS
3%3%5%2%2%10%11%13%12%7%13%5%5%3%6%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
174
ACTIONS
1%3%4%3%2%12%11%10%10%13%14%5%1%3%6%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the right wing of the attacking third (12.9% of all actions). 58% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 42% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 15% defensive, 53% middle, 32% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Torino leaned on their left (48%); Como leaned on their right (40%).

Torino
48%Left side23%Middle29%Right sideATTACKING →
L
48%23%29%
R
Como
28%Left side32%Middle40%Right sideATTACKING →
L
28%32%40%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Torino — 23 entries, 39% through the left wing
Left wing: 9 entries (39%)939%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 6 entries (26%)626%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 2 entries (9%)29%CENTRERight half-space: 4 entries (17%)417%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 2 entries (9%)29%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Como — 83 entries, 42% through the right wing
Left wing: 16 entries (19%)1619%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 9 entries (11%)911%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 11 entries (13%)1113%CENTRERight half-space: 12 entries (14%)1214%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 35 entries (42%)3542%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Torino

The football question
How does Torino progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

131build-up passes attempted
73%completed
27%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

46CB · 48%
8Long Wide · 8%
37Wide → FB · 39%
5Central · 5%
CB46 · 48%
right: 24 passes, most from Coco24left: 22 passes, most from Comuzzo22
Long Wide8 · 8%
left: 5 passes, most from Perri5right: 3 passes, most from Bragança3
Wide → FB37 · 39%
left: 21 passes, most from Perri21right: 16 passes, most from Perri16
Central5 · 5%
left: 3 passes, most from Fitz-Jim3right: 2 passes, most from Adams2
◆ Vision AI Insight
Torino build predominantly down the left, with Coco as the fulcrum (17 build-up passes). Only 28% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LHS def → LW def (8×).

Como

The football question
How does Como progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

116build-up passes attempted
88%completed
35%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third

Pass types

43CB · 42%
7Long Wide · 7%
2Long Central · 2%
40Wide → FB · 39%
10Central · 10%
CB43 · 42%
left: 25 passes, most from Kempf25right: 18 passes, most from Ramón18
Long Wide7 · 7%
left: 5 passes, most from Sánchez5right: 2 passes, most from Smolcic2
Long Central2 · 2%
Wide → FB40 · 39%
right: 26 passes, most from Sánchez26left: 14 passes, most from Sánchez14
Central10 · 10%
right: 8 passes, most from Cunha8left: 2 passes, most from Milla2
◆ Vision AI Insight
Como build predominantly down the right, with Sánchez as the fulcrum (25 build-up passes). Only 37% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (7×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Torino

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 23 progressive passes across 1 match (23.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
26%
Right half-space
4%
Central
17%
Left half-space
17%
Left wing
35%
Progression is left-dominant: 30% right side · 17% central · 52% left.

Who generates it

Daniel Bragança
5 · 22%
Lucas Perri
4 · 17%
Pietro Comuzzo
4 · 17%
Nikola Vlasic
3 · 13%
Ché Adams
2 · 9%
Top two — Daniel Bragança & Lucas Perri — account for 39% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
23.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
39% reach final third
9% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 61% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 39% of progressive passes reached the final third and 9% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 39% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacesterile
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient

Como

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 60 progressive passes across 1 match (60.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
48%
Right half-space
10%
Central
5%
Left half-space
8%
Left wing
28%
Progression is right-dominant: 58% right side · 5% central · 37% left.

Who generates it

Lucas da Cunha
10 · 17%
Jacobo Ramón
8 · 13%
Yan Couto
8 · 13%
Luis Milla
6 · 10%
Nico Paz
5 · 8%
Top two — Lucas da Cunha & Jacobo Ramón — account for 30% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
60.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
20% reach final third
22% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 80% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 20% of progressive passes reached the final third and 22% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 30% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Torino

The question
Where do Torino's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

11shots
1.0xG
0.09xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (27%)27%3Settled attack: 6 shots (55%)55%6Set piece: 2 shots (18%)18%211SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 27% of shots310.380.13
Cut-back110.210.21
Pass into the box / short pass100.110.11
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.060.06
Settled attack 55% of shots600.420.07
Pass into the box / short pass400.280.07
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.140.07
Set piece 18% of shots200.210.10
Corner200.210.10

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Nikola Vlasic30.260
Kian Fitz-Jim10.211
Daniel Bragança10.110
Gvidas Gineitis10.020

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Giovanni Simeone30.270
Ché Adams10.211
Rafik Belghali20.200
Nikola Vlasic30.190
Gvidas Gineitis10.110
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Torino's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.4 of 1.0 xG, 6 of 11 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 3 of the 11 shots (27%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 11 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 1.0 xG (-0.0).

Como

The question
Where do Como's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

18shots
2.0xG
0.11xG per shot
2big chances (0.3+ xG)
3goals
Attacking transition: 1 shots (6%)6%1Settled attack: 15 shots (83%)83%15Set piece: 2 shots (11%)11%218SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 6% of shots100.070.07
Pass into the box / short pass100.070.07
Settled attack 83% of shots1521.790.12
Cross310.280.09
Cut-back100.130.13
Long ball100.040.04
Pass into the box / short pass400.740.18
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)610.610.10
Set piece 11% of shots210.090.05
Corner110.070.07
Free kick100.030.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Nico Paz30.650
Yan Couto30.201
Martin Baturina10.130
Lucas da Cunha10.110
Tasos Douvikas10.090

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Tasos Douvikas20.600
Nico Paz60.461
Martin Baturina10.381
Jacobo Ramón30.221
Maxence Caqueret20.120
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Como's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.8 of 2.0 xG, 15 of 18 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 1 of the 18 shots (6%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 18 shots came from set pieces; 3 goals from 2.0 xG (+1.0).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Torino

The question
How does Torino deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

3 crosses: 1 found a team-mate (33%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 3 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (67%), 1 led to a shot (33%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Como

The question
How does Como deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

32 crosses: 11 found a team-mate (34%), 4 led to a shot (12%). 3 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (33%), 1 led to a shot (33%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Torino

The question
Which part of the final third does Torino actually cross from?

3 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 1 crosses (33%)33%1advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (67%)67%2byline right wing: 0 crosses (0%)byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 0 crosses (0%)
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · left wing267%0
advanced · right wing133%0

Como

The question
Which part of the final third does Como actually cross from?

32 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (3%)3%1advanced right wing: 12 crosses (38%)38%12advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 7 crosses (22%)22%7byline right wing: 10 crosses (31%)31%10byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 1 crosses (3%)3%1byline left wing: 1 crosses (3%)3%1
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing1238%3
byline · right wing1031%1
advanced · left wing722%0
deep · left wing13%0
byline · left half-space13%0
byline · left wing13%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+1.04Torino on-ball value
+2.14Como on-ball value
+0.0+1.1+2.2HALF TIME+1.04+2.140′15′30′45′60′75′90′
TorinoComoEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Torino — where the value came from
Passes296 actions-0.01
Carries72 actions-0.03
Dribbles12 actions+0.14
Shots11 actions+0.52
Ball wins58 actions+0.42
Como — where the value came from
Passes759 actions+1.15
Carries174 actions-0.12
Dribbles16 actions-0.09
Shots18 actions+1.01
Ball wins56 actions+0.19
Torino — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Ché Adams34+0.307
Rafik Belghali34+0.229
Lucas Perri37+0.169
Nikola Vlasic48+0.135
Ardian Ismajli39+0.114
Giovanni Simeone (lowest)30-0.074
Como — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Martin Baturina35+0.872
Lucas da Cunha117+0.459
Nico Paz80+0.348
Tasos Douvikas13+0.346
Yan Couto134+0.177
Jacobo Ramón (lowest)133-0.431
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Torino

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

4 of 18 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%4/18Coco2 of 19 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%2/19Perri19 of 46 pass attempts lost here (41%).41%19/46Perri4 of 27 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%4/27Perri6 of 21 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%6/21Comuzzo4 of 16 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%4/16Belghali4 of 23 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%4/23Simeone0 of 25 pass attempts lost here (0%).0%0/253 of 23 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%3/23Kulenovic12 of 31 pass attempts lost here (39%).39%12/31Comuzzo13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.5 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 17 pass attempts lost here (35%).35%6/17Gineitisattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
22
Failed forward pass
16
Failed take-on
4
Lost in the defensive third
35
Their weakest zone is the central in the defensive third: 41% of 46 pass attempts there are lost (19 times). Separately, 28% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Como

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

5 of 23 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%5/23Couto3 of 23 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%3/23Sánchez4 of 41 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%4/41Kempf0 of 16 pass attempts lost here (0%).0%0/1613 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 75 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%6/75Ramón6 of 83 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%6/83Ramón10 of 97 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%10/97Perrone3 of 89 pass attempts lost here (3%).3%3/89Kempf3 of 56 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%3/56Kaiki19 of 95 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%19/95Couto9 of 36 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%9/36Paz7 of 39 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%7/39Caqueret5 of 25 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%5/25Baturina12 of 48 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%12/48Millaattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
52
Failed forward pass
36
Failed take-on
14
Lost in the defensive third
14
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the attacking third: 25% of 36 pass attempts there are lost (9 times). Separately, 55% of all losses happen in the attacking third — cheap, low-risk turnovers.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Torino

Not just press intensity, but where the 167 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
10%
Middle third
23%
Own third
67%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 9.3 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 10% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 23% in midfield.

Where they win it back

1065191211DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

Como

Not just press intensity, but where the 140 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
19%
Middle third
37%
Own third
44%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.5 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 19% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 37% in midfield.

Where they win it back

1511151281311128851435DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Torino

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Torino win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 31 opposition possessions that Torino ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
7.6passes
median 6 · before Torino win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
22sec
median 13s · 31.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
16%
29%
29%
26%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
7.0
16s
15–30′
5.5
13s
30–45+′
5.0
12s
45–60′
3.3
9s
60–75′
11.8
42s
75–90+′
14.3
48s
average passesaverage seconds

Como

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Como win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 29 opposition possessions that Como ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
3.3passes
median 3 · before Como win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
9sec
median 4s · 29.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
48%
34%
14%
3%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
5.8
18s
15–30′
2.2
4s
30–45+′
2.5
6s
45–60′
3.7
12s
60–75′
1.7
1s
75–90+′
2.4
8s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Torino — 167 actions, 127 won
Como — 140 actions, 115 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Torino — 106 wins · 6% in the final third, 12% midfield, 82% own third
own third, right: 12 of 106 wins (11%)11%12 winsown third, centre: 55 of 106 wins (52%)52%55 winsown third, left: 20 of 106 wins (19%)19%20 winsmidfield, right: 3 of 106 wins (3%)3%3 winsmidfield, centre: 7 of 106 wins (7%)7%7 winsmidfield, left: 3 of 106 wins (3%)3%3 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 106 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 0 of 106 wins (0%)final third, left: 5 of 106 wins (5%)5%5 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Kian Fitz-Jimball-recovery23′96
Kian Fitz-Jimtackle23′93
Nikola Vlasicball-recovery19′75
Gvidas Gineitisball-recovery59′75
Ché Adamsball-recovery34′68
Como — 80 wins · 6% in the final third, 36% midfield, 58% own third
own third, right: 19 of 80 wins (24%)24%19 winsown third, centre: 18 of 80 wins (22%)22%18 winsown third, left: 9 of 80 wins (11%)11%9 winsmidfield, right: 13 of 80 wins (16%)16%13 winsmidfield, centre: 7 of 80 wins (9%)9%7 winsmidfield, left: 9 of 80 wins (11%)11%9 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 80 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 1 of 80 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 3 of 80 wins (4%)4%3 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Álex Valletackle40′77
Maxence Caquerettackle7′76
Máximo Perronetackle30′75
Máximo Perroneball-recovery16′74
Maxence Caqueretball-recovery40′71
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Torino

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Torino? 60 opponent progressive passes and 18 shots faced (2.0 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Torino)

Right wing
52%
Right half-space
12%
Central
7%
Left half-space
6%
Left wing
24%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (52% of the danger conceded).

Como

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Como? 23 opponent progressive passes and 11 shots faced (1.0 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Como)

Right wing
23%
Right half-space
5%
Central
19%
Left half-space
17%
Left wing
36%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (36% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Torino

Build-up (own third)

safer, quicker

right 23% · centre 40% · left 37%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
157
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+12.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
25%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
44% of 55
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
65%
Progression (middle third)

safer, left-sided, shorter passing

right 27% · centre 32% · left 41%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
161
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
24%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
35% of 52
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
52%
Final third

safer, more recycling, left-sided

right 37% · centre 16% · left 47%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
62
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
17%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
32% of 25
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
48%

Como

Build-up (own third)

safer, playing short, right-sided

right 32% · centre 48% · left 20%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
139
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+8.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
15%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
78% of 50
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
24%
Progression (middle third)

safer, playing short, kept on the floor

right 35% · centre 34% · left 32%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
504
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
6%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.4 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
57% of 72
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
42%
Final third

safer, right-sided

right 52% · centre 20% · left 28%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
306
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
29% of 49
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
51%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Torino
compared with their other 8 matches this season
Passes296vs 503
Pass accuracy73%vs 82%
Progressive carries23vs 39
Defensive actions167vs 144
Field tilt21%vs 42%
Como
compared with their other 8 matches this season
Passes759vs 631
Progressive carries62vs 49
Final-third entries83vs 58
Field tilt79%vs 60%
PPDA3.5vs 4.8

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Torino

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
11%
Progressive
0%
Neutral / sideways
54%
Safe / backward
34%
11% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 89% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Como

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
13%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
49%
Safe / backward
36%
14% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 86% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Torino: 5 corners, 2 led to a shot; Como: 6 corners, 0 led to a shot, 1 set-piece goal.

Torino

5Corners
2Led to a shot
0Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.21Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
20%20%1 corner60%2 from the left flag3 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Como

6Corners
0Led to a shot
6Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.09Set-piece xG
1Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
17%1 corner50%3 corners17%17%4 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Torino
Como

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report