Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-09-05

Inter v Napoli

InterHome
3–2
NapoliAway
4.131.95expected goals
3.121.79xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (4.13 – 1.95 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Inter
Napoli
Possession (share of passes)
61.7%38.3%
Duels
6655
Duels won
54.5%41.8%
Aerial duels
3535
Aerial duels won
2114
Successful dribbles
63
Passes
610378
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Inter above the line, Napoli below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
1.583.174.75Piotr Zielinski — save, 0.02 xGAndy Diouf — save, 0.07 xGFrank Anguissa — save, 0.16 xGMatteo Politano — save, 0.07 xGPiotr Zielinski — save, 0.05 xGPiotr Zielinski — save, 0.06 xGFrancesco Pio Esposito — save, 0.09 xGAlisson Santos — save, 0.04 xGFederico Dimarco — miss, 0.03 xGFrancesco Pio Esposito — miss, 0.10 xGFrank Anguissa — save, 0.10 xGYann Bisseck — miss, 0.07 xGRafa Marín — miss, 0.06 xGRasmus Højlund — save, 0.09 xGLautaro Martínez — save, 0.05 xGFederico Dimarco — post, 0.03 xGStanislav Lobotka — save, 0.03 xGMatteo Politano — save, 0.11 xGMatteo Politano — goal, 0.10 xGPiotr Zielinski — save, 0.04 xGAlisson Santos — save, 0.05 xGFrank Anguissa — save, 0.10 xGRasmus Højlund — goal, 0.04 xGLautaro Martínez — save, 0.13 xGFederico Dimarco — miss, 0.02 xGCurtis Jones — save, 0.03 xGLautaro Martínez — goal, 0.78 xGLautaro Martínez — save, 0.11 xGFederico Dimarco — miss, 0.05 xGLautaro Martínez — miss, 0.40 xGYann Bisseck — miss, 0.06 xGMarcus Thuram — save, 0.08 xGAndy Diouf — miss, 0.05 xGMarcus Thuram — post, 0.37 xGManuel Akanji — miss, 0.09 xGAlisson Santos — save, 0.05 xGMarcus Thuram — post, 0.06 xGMarcus Thuram — goal, 0.07 xGMarcus Thuram — miss, 0.10 xGDavid Neres — miss, 0.12 xGLorenzo Lucca — miss, 0.07 xGFrank Anguissa — miss, 0.74 xGNicolò Barella — save, 0.07 xGManuel Akanji — miss, 0.41 xGLautaro Martínez — goal, 0.64 xG4.131.95Piotr Zielinski — save, 0.19 xGOTAndy Diouf — save, 0.23 xGOTFrank Anguissa — save, 0.10 xGOTMatteo Politano — save, 0.30 xGOTPiotr Zielinski — save, 0.05 xGOTPiotr Zielinski — save, 0.07 xGOTFrancesco Pio Esposito — save, 0.03 xGOTAlisson Santos — save, 0.08 xGOTFrank Anguissa — save, 0.08 xGOTRasmus Højlund — save, 0.38 xGOTLautaro Martínez — save, 0.25 xGOTStanislav Lobotka — save, 0.04 xGOTMatteo Politano — save, 0.04 xGOTMatteo Politano — goal, 0.20 xGOTPiotr Zielinski — save, 0.03 xGOTAlisson Santos — save, 0.12 xGOTFrank Anguissa — save, 0.04 xGOTRasmus Højlund — goal, 0.33 xGOTLautaro Martínez — save, 0.07 xGOTCurtis Jones — save, 0.02 xGOTLautaro Martínez — goal, 0.79 xGOTLautaro Martínez — save, 0.06 xGOTMarcus Thuram — save, 0.03 xGOTAlisson Santos — save, 0.10 xGOTMarcus Thuram — goal, 0.29 xGOTNicolò Barella — save, 0.09 xGOTLautaro Martínez — goal, 0.92 xGOT3.121.790'15'30'45'60'75'90'
InterNapolisolid = xG45 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Inter
Napoli

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Inter or Napoli got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 5 of 5 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Inter

The question
When Inter has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Inter's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 20.2% of the time on the ball20%Progression: 39.0% of the time on the ball39%Chance creation: 39.4% of the time on the ball39%Attacking transition: 1.4% of the time on the ball39%CHANCE CREATION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up20.2%
Progression39.0%
Chance creation39.4%
Attacking transition1.4%
Vision AI Model Insight
Chance creation is where Inter spends most of its time on the ball (39% of its time on the ball).

Napoli

The question
When Napoli has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Napoli's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 23.4% of the time on the ball23%Progression: 46.6% of the time on the ball47%Chance creation: 27.8% of the time on the ball28%Attacking transition: 2.3% of the time on the ball47%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up23.4%
Progression46.6%
Chance creation27.8%
Attacking transition2.3%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Napoli spends most of its time on the ball (47% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Inter
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Napoli
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Inter — 781 touches
Napoli — 545 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Inter

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Inter actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
610
ACTIONS
3%4%9%4%2%5%9%10%10%7%7%8%4%8%9%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
154
ACTIONS
1%2%8%6%1%10%7%15%18%8%5%5%6%8%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left half-space of the middle third (11.5% of all actions). 66% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 34% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 22% defensive, 45% middle, 34% attacking.

Napoli

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Napoli actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
378
ACTIONS
7%4%12%5%6%7%11%10%9%8%6%4%2%4%6%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
89
ACTIONS
3%1%7%7%6%12%6%4%11%16%10%2%3%11%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (11.3% of all actions). 57% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 43% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 32% defensive, 45% middle, 23% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Inter
38%Left side28%Middle34%Right sideATTACKING →
L
38%28%34%
R
Napoli
39%Left side25%Middle36%Right sideATTACKING →
L
39%25%36%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Inter — 69 entries, 35% through the left wing
Left wing: 24 entries (35%)2435%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 12 entries (17%)1217%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 6 entries (9%)69%CENTRERight half-space: 12 entries (17%)1217%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 15 entries (22%)1522%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Napoli — 28 entries, 39% through the left wing
Left wing: 11 entries (39%)1139%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 6 entries (21%)621%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 1 entries (4%)14%CENTRERight half-space: 1 entries (4%)14%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 9 entries (32%)932%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Inter

The football question
How does Inter progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

139build-up passes attempted
88%completed
22%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

53CB · 43%
4Long Wide · 3%
1Long Central · 1%
50Wide → FB · 41%
14Central · 11%

Sequence success — build-up

18build-up sequences in this match
6%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
39%turned over with nothing to show
CB53 · 43%
left: 29 passes, most from Bastoni29right: 24 passes, most from Bisseck24
Long Wide4 · 3%
left: 2 passes, most from Dimarco2right: 2 passes, most from Diouf2
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB50 · 41%
right: 26 passes, most from Martínez26left: 24 passes, most from Martínez24
Central14 · 11%
left: 8 passes, most from Martínez8right: 6 passes, most from Martínez6
◆ Vision AI Insight
Inter build predominantly down the right, with Martínez as the fulcrum (32 build-up passes). Only 22% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → C def (11×).

Napoli

The football question
How does Napoli progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

127build-up passes attempted
69%completed
26%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

41CB · 47%
9Long Wide · 10%
2Long Central · 2%
29Wide → FB · 33%
7Central · 8%

Sequence success — build-up

39build-up sequences in this match
0%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
49%turned over with nothing to show
CB41 · 47%
right: 25 passes, most from Lorenzo25left: 16 passes, most from Marín16
Long Wide9 · 10%
right: 6 passes, most from Meret6left: 3 passes, most from Politano3
Long Central2 · 2%
right: 2 passes, most from Meret2
Wide → FB29 · 33%
left: 20 passes, most from Spinazzola20right: 9 passes, most from Meret9
Central7 · 8%
right: 4 passes, most from Lobotka4left: 3 passes, most from Spinazzola3
◆ Vision AI Insight
Napoli build predominantly down the right, with Marín as the fulcrum (16 build-up passes). Only 26% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (6×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Inter

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 50 progressive passes across 1 match (50.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
30%
Right half-space
16%
Central
4%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
40%
Progression is left-dominant: 46% right side · 4% central · 50% left.

Who generates it

Yann Bisseck
7 · 14%
Alessandro Bastoni
6 · 12%
Nicolò Barella
6 · 12%
Federico Dimarco
6 · 12%
Carlos Augusto
6 · 12%
Top two — Yann Bisseck & Alessandro Bastoni — account for 26% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
50.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
18% reach final third
34% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 82% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 18% of progressive passes reached the final third and 34% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 26% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient

Napoli

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 31 progressive passes across 1 match (31.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
32%
Right half-space
19%
Central
26%
Left half-space
3%
Left wing
19%
Progression is right-dominant: 52% right side · 26% central · 23% left.

Who generates it

Matteo Politano
8 · 26%
Alex Meret
6 · 19%
Rafa Marín
4 · 13%
Giovanni Di Lorenzo
4 · 13%
Leonardo Spinazzola
3 · 10%
Top two — Matteo Politano & Alex Meret — account for 45% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
31.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
10% reach final third
16% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 90% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 10% of progressive passes reached the final third and 16% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 45% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralefficient
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingsterile
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Inter

The question
Where do Inter's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

29shots
4.1xG
0.14xG per shot
5big chances (0.3+ xG)
3goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (10%)10%3Settled attack: 20 shots (69%)69%20Set piece: 6 shots (21%)21%629SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 10% of shots300.240.08
Pass into the box / short pass300.240.08
Settled attack 69% of shots2022.650.13
Cross410.410.10
Cut-back100.060.06
Pass into the box / short pass911.590.18
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)600.590.10
Set piece 21% of shots611.250.21
Corner511.220.24
Free kick100.030.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Federico Dimarco20.881
Andy Diouf70.730
Lautaro Martínez20.150
Yann Bisseck10.130
Piotr Zielinski10.110

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Lautaro Martínez62.112
Marcus Thuram50.691
Manuel Akanji20.490
Francesco Pio Esposito20.190
Piotr Zielinski40.170
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Inter's chances, by xG, is settled attack (2.6 of 4.1 xG, 20 of 29 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 3 of the 29 shots (10%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 6 of the 29 shots came from set pieces; 3 goals from 4.1 xG (-1.1).

Napoli

The question
Where do Napoli's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

16shots
2.0xG
0.12xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 4 shots (25%)25%4Settled attack: 10 shots (62%)62%10Set piece: 2 shots (12%)12%216SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 25% of shots410.440.11
Cross200.240.12
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)210.210.10
Settled attack 62% of shots1011.350.14
Cross110.040.04
Cut-back401.010.25
Pass into the box / short pass200.090.04
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)300.210.07
Set piece 12% of shots200.160.08
Corner200.160.08

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Kevin De Bruyne20.810
Alisson Santos20.240
Giovanni Di Lorenzo20.141
Matteo Politano10.100
Leonardo Spinazzola10.050

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Frank Anguissa41.100
Matteo Politano30.281
Alisson Santos30.140
Rasmus Højlund20.141
David Neres10.120
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Napoli's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.4 of 2.0 xG, 10 of 16 shots), mostly cut-back. 4 of the 16 shots (25%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 16 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 2.0 xG (+0.0).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Inter

The question
How does Inter deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

19 crosses: 9 found a team-mate (47%), 4 led to a shot (21%). 6 cut-backs: 4 found a team-mate (67%), 1 led to a shot (17%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Napoli

The question
How does Napoli deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

16 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (25%), 2 led to a shot (12%). 4 cut-backs: 3 found a team-mate (75%), 3 led to a shot (75%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Inter

The question
Which part of the final third does Inter actually cross from?

19 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 2 crosses (11%)11%2deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 2 crosses (11%)11%2advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 6 crosses (32%)32%6byline right wing: 4 crosses (21%)21%4byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 2 crosses (11%)11%2byline left wing: 3 crosses (16%)16%3
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · left wing632%2
byline · right wing421%2
byline · left wing316%0
deep · right wing211%0
advanced · right wing211%0
byline · left half-space211%0

Napoli

The question
Which part of the final third does Napoli actually cross from?

16 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 3 crosses (19%)19%3deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (6%)6%1advanced right wing: 2 crosses (12%)12%2advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 0 crosses (0%)byline right wing: 5 crosses (31%)31%5byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 5 crosses (31%)31%5
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing531%1
byline · left wing531%1
deep · right wing319%0
advanced · right wing212%0
deep · left wing16%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+3.19Inter on-ball value
+1.80Napoli on-ball value
+0.0+1.6+3.2HALF TIME+3.19+1.800′15′30′45′60′75′90′
InterNapoliEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Inter — where the value came from
Passes610 actions+0.44
Carries154 actions+0.14
Dribbles11 actions+0.07
Shots29 actions+2.08
Ball wins60 actions+0.47
Napoli — where the value came from
Passes378 actions+0.25
Carries89 actions+0.17
Dribbles15 actions+0.00
Shots16 actions+1.08
Ball wins46 actions+0.31
Inter — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Lautaro Martínez47+1.199
Federico Dimarco45+0.752
Marcus Thuram13+0.423
Manuel Akanji84+0.375
Piotr Zielinski101+0.364
Curtis Jones (lowest)58-0.507
Napoli — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Frank Anguissa35+0.615
David Neres14+0.287
Alisson Santos46+0.169
Rafa Marín54+0.126
Stanislav Lobotka37+0.108
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Inter

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

2 of 20 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%2/20Diouf3 of 27 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%3/27Akanji6 of 54 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%6/54Martínez2 of 23 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%2/23Bastoni4 of 15 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%4/15Dimarco4 of 29 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%4/29Bisseck2 of 56 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%2/56Akanji1 of 63 pass attempts lost here (2%).2%1/63Esposito4 of 61 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%4/61Akanji6 of 43 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%6/43Augusto8 of 44 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%8/44Barella11 of 48 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%11/48Diouf5 of 23 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%5/23Barella10 of 48 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%10/48Martínez19 of 56 pass attempts lost here (34%).34%19/56Dimarcoattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
53
Failed forward pass
34
Failed take-on
5
Lost in the defensive third
17
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the attacking third: 34% of 56 pass attempts there are lost (19 times). Separately, 61% of all losses happen in the attacking third — cheap, low-risk turnovers.

Napoli

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

9 of 25 pass attempts lost here (36%).36%9/25Lorenzo4 of 15 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%4/15Lobotka17 of 47 pass attempts lost here (36%).36%17/47Meret5 of 18 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%5/18Lobotka4 of 22 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%4/22Spinazzola5 of 26 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%5/26Højlund8 of 40 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%8/40Højlund5 of 36 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%5/36Marín3 of 34 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%3/34Santos6 of 31 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%6/31Spinazzola7 of 24 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%7/24Politano14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 of 16 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%3/16Santos6 of 21 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%6/21Santosattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
21
Failed forward pass
15
Failed take-on
12
Lost in the defensive third
39
Their weakest zone is the central in the defensive third: 36% of 47 pass attempts there are lost (17 times). Separately, 24% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Inter

Not just press intensity, but where the 155 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
28%
Middle third
40%
Own third
32%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.2 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 28% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 40% in midfield.

Where they win it back

1042011549132313101668DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

Napoli

Not just press intensity, but where the 156 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
8%
Middle third
28%
Own third
65%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 7.0 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 8% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 28% in midfield.

Where they win it back

9185217209DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Inter

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Inter win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 25 opposition possessions that Inter ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
3.4passes
median 2 · before Inter win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
9sec
median 3s · 25.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
56%
28%
8%
8%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
1.8
2s
15–30′

too few
30–45+′
3.0
11s
45–60′

too few
60–75′
3.5
8s
75–90+′
3.8
9s
average passesaverage seconds

Napoli

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Napoli win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 27 opposition possessions that Napoli ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.4passes
median 3 · before Napoli win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
16sec
median 10s · 27.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
41%
26%
15%
19%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
8.8
27s
15–30′
3.1
5s
30–45+′
2.0
6s
45–60′
4.5
10s
60–75′
10.8
41s
75–90+′
3.5
11s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Inter — 155 actions, 118 won
Napoli — 156 actions, 117 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Inter — 83 wins · 14% in the final third, 39% midfield, 47% own third
own third, right: 9 of 83 wins (11%)11%9 winsown third, centre: 19 of 83 wins (23%)23%19 winsown third, left: 11 of 83 wins (13%)13%11 winsmidfield, right: 8 of 83 wins (10%)10%8 winsmidfield, centre: 9 of 83 wins (11%)11%9 winsmidfield, left: 15 of 83 wins (18%)18%15 winsfinal third, right: 5 of 83 wins (6%)6%5 winsfinal third, centre: 2 of 83 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, left: 5 of 83 wins (6%)6%5 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Lautaro Martíneztackle13′83
Andy Diouftackle13′82
Petar Sucicball-recovery13′80
Lautaro Martínezball-recovery69′80
Hakan Çalhanogluball-recovery92′78
Napoli — 88 wins · 3% in the final third, 19% midfield, 77% own third
own third, right: 13 of 88 wins (15%)15%13 winsown third, centre: 44 of 88 wins (50%)50%44 winsown third, left: 11 of 88 wins (12%)12%11 winsmidfield, right: 8 of 88 wins (9%)9%8 winsmidfield, centre: 5 of 88 wins (6%)6%5 winsmidfield, left: 4 of 88 wins (5%)5%4 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 88 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 0 of 88 wins (0%)final third, left: 2 of 88 wins (2%)2%2 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Antonio Vergarainterception36′89
Rasmus Højlundball-recovery54′86
Amir Rrahmaniclearance18′68
Stanislav Lobotkaball-recovery46′63
Amir Rrahmaniball-recovery5′61
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Inter

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Inter? 31 opponent progressive passes and 16 shots faced (2.0 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Inter)

Right wing
31%
Right half-space
26%
Central
30%
Left half-space
2%
Left wing
11%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (31% of the danger conceded).

Napoli

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Napoli? 50 opponent progressive passes and 29 shots faced (4.1 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Napoli)

Right wing
25%
Right half-space
19%
Central
3%
Left half-space
8%
Left wing
45%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (45% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Inter

Build-up (own third)

safer

right 27% · centre 47% · left 26%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
167
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+8.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
17%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
70% of 47
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
32%
Progression (middle third)

safer, played inside, narrow, central

right 29% · centre 35% · left 36%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
342
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
26%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
66% of 65
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
38%
Final third

safer, played inside, narrow, central

right 41% · centre 15% · left 45%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
266
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
38% of 60
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
52%

Napoli

Build-up (own third)

safer, played in the channels

right 28% · centre 43% · left 30%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
152
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+12.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
14%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
29%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
41% of 63
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
59%
Progression (middle third)

safer

right 39% · centre 24% · left 37%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
217
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
42% of 52
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
58%
Final third

safer

right 41% · centre 12% · left 47%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
113
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
22%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
33% of 30
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
43%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Inter
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Expected goals4.13vs 2.36
PPDA3.2vs 4.8
Progressive passes50vs 65
Pass accuracy86%vs 89%
Defensive actions155vs 133
Napoli
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Threat from passing3.54vs 6.71
Final-third entries28vs 55
Progressive carries34vs 61
Pass accuracy77%vs 84%
Passes378vs 559

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Inter

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
14%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
47%
Safe / backward
38%
16% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 84% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Napoli

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
12%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
53%
Safe / backward
33%
14% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 86% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Inter: 10 corners, 2 led to a shot, 1 set-piece goal; Napoli: 5 corners, 1 led to a shot.

Inter

10Corners
2Led to a shot
1Free kicks, their half
6Set-piece shots
1.25Set-piece xG
1Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
30%3 corners30%10%1 corner10%1 corner20%6 from the left flag4 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Napoli

5Corners
1Led to a shot
1Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.16Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
20%1 corner20%1 corner40%20%1 corner1 from the left flag4 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Inter
Napoli

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report