Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-09-07

Udinese v Lazio

0.941.82expected goals
1.121.92xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (0.94 – 1.82 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Udinese
Lazio
Possession (share of passes)
39.8%60.2%
Duels
5245
Duels won
63.5%35.6%
Aerial duels
2323
Aerial duels won
158
Successful dribbles
87
Passes
392593
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Udinese above the line, Lazio below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.731.472.20Nuno Tavares — save, 0.04 xGUnai Gómez — save, 0.05 xGKeinan Davis — save, 0.10 xGHassane Kamara — save, 0.10 xGMattia Zaccagni — save, 0.03 xGGustav Isaksen — miss, 0.09 xGJurgen Ekkelenkamp — save, 0.03 xGHassane Kamara — save, 0.03 xGKeinan Davis — save, 0.09 xGNuno Tavares — save, 0.07 xGJesper Karlström — goal, 0.25 xGKeinan Davis — save, 0.21 xGKenneth Taylor — miss, 0.05 xGDavide Frattesi — save, 0.07 xGOliver Provstgaard — save, 0.11 xGMattia Zaccagni — save, 0.21 xGDanilho Doekhi — miss, 0.06 xGTijjani Noslin — miss, 0.04 xGMattia Zaccagni — miss, 0.05 xGJurgen Ekkelenkamp — save, 0.06 xGDavide Frattesi — save, 0.11 xGMatteo Cancellieri — save, 0.13 xGDavide Frattesi — goal, 0.49 xGKenneth Taylor — save, 0.04 xGMattia Zaccagni — post, 0.04 xGAlbert Gudmundsson — goal, 0.07 xGHassane Kamara — miss, 0.03 xGAlbert Gudmundsson — miss, 0.07 xGMatteo Cancellieri — save, 0.04 xG0.941.82Nuno Tavares — save, 0.02 xGOTUnai Gómez — save, 0.03 xGOTKeinan Davis — save, 0.09 xGOTHassane Kamara — save, 0.08 xGOTMattia Zaccagni — save, 0.10 xGOTJurgen Ekkelenkamp — save, 0.03 xGOTHassane Kamara — save, 0.14 xGOTKeinan Davis — save, 0.14 xGOTNuno Tavares — save, 0.06 xGOTJesper Karlström — goal, 0.34 xGOTKeinan Davis — save, 0.21 xGOTDavide Frattesi — save, 0.15 xGOTOliver Provstgaard — save, 0.09 xGOTMattia Zaccagni — save, 0.38 xGOTJurgen Ekkelenkamp — save, 0.07 xGOTDavide Frattesi — save, 0.08 xGOTMatteo Cancellieri — save, 0.20 xGOTDavide Frattesi — goal, 0.46 xGOTKenneth Taylor — save, 0.04 xGOTAlbert Gudmundsson — goal, 0.21 xGOTMatteo Cancellieri — save, 0.13 xGOT1.121.920'15'30'45'60'75'90'
UdineseLaziosolid = xG29 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Udinese
Lazio

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Udinese or Lazio got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 3 of 3 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Udinese

The question
When Udinese has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Udinese's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 20.2% of the time on the ball20%Progression: 58.4% of the time on the ball58%Chance creation: 18.8% of the time on the ball19%Attacking transition: 2.6% of the time on the ball58%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up20.2%
Progression58.4%
Chance creation18.8%
Attacking transition2.6%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Udinese spends most of its time on the ball (58% of its time on the ball).

Lazio

The question
When Lazio has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Lazio's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 18.4% of the time on the ball18%Progression: 54.7% of the time on the ball55%Chance creation: 26.4% of the time on the ball26%Attacking transition: 0.6% of the time on the ball55%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up18.4%
Progression54.7%
Chance creation26.4%
Attacking transition0.6%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Lazio spends most of its time on the ball (55% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Udinese
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD10 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Lazio
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Udinese — 547 touches
Lazio — 746 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Udinese

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Udinese actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
392
ACTIONS
4%7%12%4%3%11%10%14%7%8%6%4%4%3%3%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
75
ACTIONS
5%7%3%1%15%13%13%7%16%5%4%3%3%5%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (13.5% of all actions). 64% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 36% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 28% defensive, 53% middle, 20% attacking.

Lazio

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Lazio actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
593
ACTIONS
3%4%7%5%4%8%8%11%15%11%4%4%4%6%6%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
132
ACTIONS
6%11%5%2%7%9%19%19%10%3%2%2%5%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left half-space of the middle third (16.0% of all actions). 66% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 34% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 23% defensive, 54% middle, 22% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Udinese
32%Left side33%Middle35%Right sideATTACKING →
L
32%33%35%
R
Lazio
44%Left side32%Middle24%Right sideATTACKING →
L
44%32%24%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Udinese — 39 entries, 23% through the centre
Left wing: 5 entries (13%)513%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 7 entries (18%)718%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 9 entries (23%)923%CENTRERight half-space: 9 entries (23%)923%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 9 entries (23%)923%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Lazio — 40 entries, 40% through the left wing
Left wing: 16 entries (40%)1640%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 6 entries (15%)615%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 5 entries (12%)512%CENTRERight half-space: 5 entries (12%)512%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 8 entries (20%)820%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Udinese

The football question
How does Udinese progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

117build-up passes attempted
82%completed
36%reach the middle third
5%go long into the final third

Pass types

46CB · 48%
11Long Wide · 11%
7Long Central · 7%
22Wide → FB · 23%
10Central · 10%

Sequence success — build-up

15build-up sequences in this match
20%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
27%turned over with nothing to show
CB46 · 48%
right: 33 passes, most from Ebosse33left: 13 passes, most from Ebosse13
Long Wide11 · 11%
right: 10 passes, most from Okoye10
Long Central7 · 7%
right: 6 passes, most from Okoye6
Wide → FB22 · 23%
right: 13 passes, most from Okoye13left: 9 passes, most from Kamara9
Central10 · 10%
left: 5 passes, most from Karlström5right: 5 passes, most from Okoye5
◆ Vision AI Insight
Udinese build predominantly down the right, with Okoye as the fulcrum (28 build-up passes). Only 42% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (8×).

Lazio

The football question
How does Lazio progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

137build-up passes attempted
84%completed
26%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

37CB · 32%
5Long Wide · 4%
1Long Central · 1%
58Wide → FB · 50%
14Central · 12%

Sequence success — build-up

29build-up sequences in this match
7%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
52%turned over with nothing to show
CB37 · 32%
left: 24 passes, most from Provstgaard24right: 13 passes, most from Doekhi13
Long Wide5 · 4%
right: 4 passes, most from Mandas4
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB58 · 50%
left: 33 passes, most from Tavares33right: 25 passes, most from Mussolini25
Central14 · 12%
right: 8 passes, most from Mandas8left: 6 passes, most from Mandas6
◆ Vision AI Insight
Lazio build predominantly down the left, with Mandas as the fulcrum (21 build-up passes). Only 26% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LHS def → C def (9×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Udinese

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 52 progressive passes across 1 match (52.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
35%
Right half-space
23%
Central
15%
Left half-space
8%
Left wing
19%
Progression is right-dominant: 58% right side · 15% central · 27% left.

Who generates it

Mërgim Vojvoda
13 · 25%
Maduka Okoye
11 · 21%
Hassane Kamara
6 · 12%
Jesper Karlström
5 · 10%
Oumar Solet
3 · 6%
Top two — Mërgim Vojvoda & Maduka Okoye — account for 46% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
52.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
33% reach final third
21% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 67% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 33% of progressive passes reached the final third and 21% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 46% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spaceefficient
Centralsterile
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingbalanced

Lazio

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 35 progressive passes across 1 match (35.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
14%
Right half-space
14%
Central
9%
Left half-space
26%
Left wing
37%
Progression is left-dominant: 29% right side · 9% central · 63% left.

Who generates it

Nuno Tavares
9 · 26%
Kenneth Taylor
5 · 14%
Mattia Zaccagni
5 · 14%
Danilho Doekhi
3 · 9%
Davide Frattesi
3 · 9%
Top two — Nuno Tavares & Kenneth Taylor — account for 40% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
35.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
20% reach final third
29% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 80% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 20% of progressive passes reached the final third and 29% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 40% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingsterile
Right half-spaceefficient
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Udinese

The question
Where do Udinese's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

10shots
0.9xG
0.09xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 4 shots (40%)40%4Settled attack: 6 shots (60%)60%610SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 40% of shots400.350.09
Pass into the box / short pass300.140.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.210.21
Settled attack 60% of shots610.590.10
Cross100.090.09
Long ball200.130.07
Pass into the box / short pass210.270.14
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.100.10

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Keinan Davis20.311
Jakub Piotrowski10.100
Unai Gómez10.090
Jurgen Ekkelenkamp10.050
James Abankwah10.030

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Keinan Davis30.390
Jesper Karlström10.251
Hassane Kamara30.150
Jurgen Ekkelenkamp20.090
Unai Gómez10.050
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Udinese's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.6 of 0.9 xG, 6 of 10 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 4 of the 10 shots (40%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 0 of the 10 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 0.9 xG (+0.1).

Lazio

The question
Where do Lazio's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

19shots
1.8xG
0.10xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 5 shots (26%)26%5Settled attack: 11 shots (58%)58%11Set piece: 3 shots (16%)16%319SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 26% of shots510.310.06
Cross100.090.09
Cut-back210.110.05
Pass into the box / short pass200.110.06
Settled attack 58% of shots1111.370.12
Cut-back200.180.09
Pass into the box / short pass610.980.16
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)300.220.07
Set piece 16% of shots300.140.05
Corner200.100.05
Free kick100.030.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Mattia Zaccagni10.491
Matteo Cancellieri40.390
Danilho Doekhi20.181
Kenneth Taylor20.160
Nuno Tavares10.110

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Davide Frattesi30.671
Mattia Zaccagni40.340
Matteo Cancellieri20.170
Albert Gudmundsson20.141
Oliver Provstgaard10.110
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Lazio's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.4 of 1.8 xG, 11 of 19 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 5 of the 19 shots (26%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 19 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 1.8 xG (+0.2).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Udinese

The question
How does Udinese deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

21 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (24%), 1 led to a shot (5%). 1 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Lazio

The question
How does Lazio deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

10 crosses: 1 found a team-mate (10%), 1 led to a shot (10%). 7 cut-backs: 6 found a team-mate (86%), 4 led to a shot (57%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Udinese

The question
Which part of the final third does Udinese actually cross from?

21 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 3 crosses (14%)14%3deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 2 crosses (10%)10%2advanced right wing: 5 crosses (24%)24%5advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (10%)10%2byline right wing: 4 crosses (19%)19%4byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 5 crosses (24%)24%5
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing524%0
byline · left wing524%0
byline · right wing419%1
deep · right wing314%0
deep · left wing210%0
advanced · left wing210%0

Lazio

The question
Which part of the final third does Lazio actually cross from?

10 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (10%)10%1advanced right wing: 1 crosses (10%)10%1advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 4 crosses (40%)40%4byline right wing: 2 crosses (20%)20%2byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 1 crosses (10%)10%1byline left wing: 1 crosses (10%)10%1
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · left wing440%0
byline · right wing220%0
deep · left wing110%0
advanced · right wing110%0
byline · left half-space110%1
byline · left wing110%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+0.83Udinese on-ball value
+1.30Lazio on-ball value
+0.0+0.7+1.3HALF TIME+0.83+1.300′15′30′45′60′75′90′
UdineseLazioEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Udinese — where the value came from
Passes392 actions+0.14
Carries75 actions+0.10
Dribbles18 actions-0.01
Shots10 actions+0.30
Ball wins74 actions+0.31
Lazio — where the value came from
Passes593 actions+0.64
Carries132 actions-0.00
Dribbles22 actions+0.10
Shots19 actions+0.31
Ball wins71 actions+0.25
Udinese — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Jurgen Ekkelenkamp53+0.215
Keinan Davis40+0.182
Hassane Kamara54+0.149
Maduka Okoye39+0.128
Jesper Karlström56+0.104
Vakoun Bayo (lowest)16-0.090
Lazio — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Mattia Zaccagni73+0.510
Matteo Cancellieri29+0.343
Kenneth Taylor96+0.295
Nuno Tavares123+0.257
Danilho Doekhi80+0.158
Christos Mandas (lowest)36-0.285
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Udinese

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 of 28 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%4/28Vojvoda7 of 49 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%7/49Karlström1 of 16 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%1/16Ebosse10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.7 of 44 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%7/44Vojvoda8 of 41 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%8/41Gómez6 of 53 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%6/53Solet1 of 27 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%1/27Karlström4 of 33 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%4/33Ebosse10 of 24 pass attempts lost here (42%).42%10/24Vojvoda14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 16 pass attempts lost here (38%).38%6/16Davis10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.attacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
33
Failed forward pass
21
Failed take-on
10
Lost in the defensive third
21
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the attacking third: 42% of 24 pass attempts there are lost (10 times). Separately, 41% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Lazio

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

3 of 18 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%3/18Mussolini5 of 22 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%5/22Doekhi6 of 42 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%6/42Mandas0 of 30 pass attempts lost here (0%).0%0/308 of 25 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%8/25Tavares6 of 45 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%6/45Belahyane1 of 47 pass attempts lost here (2%).2%1/47Pinamonti2 of 64 pass attempts lost here (3%).3%2/64Frattesi13 of 91 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%13/91Zaccagni6 of 63 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%6/63Tavares9 of 24 pass attempts lost here (38%).38%9/24Mussolini6 of 24 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%6/24Frattesi2 of 24 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%2/24Tavares6 of 36 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%6/36Zaccagni12 of 38 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%12/38Tavaresattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
35
Failed forward pass
25
Failed take-on
15
Lost in the defensive third
22
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the attacking third: 38% of 24 pass attempts there are lost (9 times). Separately, 41% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Udinese

Not just press intensity, but where the 163 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
18%
Middle third
42%
Own third
40%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.9 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 18% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 42% in midfield.

Where they win it back

121428562191471786104DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

Lazio

Not just press intensity, but where the 153 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
11%
Middle third
38%
Own third
51%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.5 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 11% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 38% in midfield.

Where they win it back

11182516810912141374DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Udinese

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Udinese win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 33 opposition possessions that Udinese ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.6passes
median 3 · before Udinese win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
15sec
median 7s · 33.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
42%
27%
21%
9%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.8
14s
15–30′
6.6
14s
30–45+′
2.0
4s
45–60′
6.9
18s
60–75′
17.3
55s
75–90+′
1.8
5s
average passesaverage seconds

Lazio

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Lazio win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 40 opposition possessions that Lazio ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.4passes
median 4 · before Lazio win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
18sec
median 12s · 40.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
32%
28%
28%
12%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
8.1
26s
15–30′
6.9
21s
30–45+′
3.6
12s
45–60′
4.3
17s
60–75′
2.8
11s
75–90+′
5.3
17s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Udinese — 163 actions, 131 won
Lazio — 153 actions, 115 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Udinese — 96 wins · 10% in the final third, 40% midfield, 50% own third
own third, right: 13 of 96 wins (14%)14%13 winsown third, centre: 26 of 96 wins (27%)27%26 winsown third, left: 9 of 96 wins (9%)9%9 winsmidfield, right: 18 of 96 wins (19%)19%18 winsmidfield, centre: 10 of 96 wins (10%)10%10 winsmidfield, left: 10 of 96 wins (10%)10%10 winsfinal third, right: 4 of 96 wins (4%)4%4 winsfinal third, centre: 2 of 96 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, left: 4 of 96 wins (4%)4%4 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Jurgen Ekkelenkampball-recovery72′90
Mërgim Vojvodatackle31′90
Jesper Karlströminterception62′86
Jurgen Ekkelenkampball-recovery77′78
Jurgen Ekkelenkamptackle77′76
Lazio — 91 wins · 5% in the final third, 34% midfield, 60% own third
own third, right: 19 of 91 wins (21%)21%19 winsown third, centre: 22 of 91 wins (24%)24%22 winsown third, left: 14 of 91 wins (15%)15%14 winsmidfield, right: 6 of 91 wins (7%)7%6 winsmidfield, centre: 11 of 91 wins (12%)12%11 winsmidfield, left: 14 of 91 wins (15%)15%14 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 91 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 2 of 91 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, left: 2 of 91 wins (2%)2%2 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Matteo Cancellieriball-recovery99′76
Tijjani Noslinball-recovery69′75
Kenneth Taylorball-recovery35′70
Kenneth Taylorball-recovery92′68
Davide Frattesiball-recovery73′67
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Udinese

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Udinese? 35 opponent progressive passes and 19 shots faced (1.8 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Udinese)

Right wing
12%
Right half-space
21%
Central
14%
Left half-space
20%
Left wing
32%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (32% of the danger conceded).

Lazio

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Lazio? 52 opponent progressive passes and 10 shots faced (0.9 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Lazio)

Right wing
31%
Right half-space
29%
Central
18%
Left half-space
7%
Left wing
16%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (31% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Udinese

Build-up (own third)

safer, played inside, right-sided

right 31% · centre 49% · left 20%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
132
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+14.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
9%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
30%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
59% of 54
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
44%
Progression (middle third)

safer, slower, longer passing

right 37% · centre 36% · left 27%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
253
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
13%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
48% of 61
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
49%
Final third

safer, longer passing, trying to break lines

right 42% · centre 23% · left 35%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
100
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
16%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
20% of 40
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
57%

Lazio

Build-up (own third)

safer, shorter passing, playing short

right 24% · centre 42% · left 34%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
172
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+7.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
12%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
61% of 54
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
39%
Progression (middle third)

shorter passing, safer, playing short

right 27% · centre 32% · left 41%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
406
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
5%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
45% of 66
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
45%
Final third

safer, shorter passing, narrow, central

right 31% · centre 21% · left 49%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
169
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
10%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
32% of 44
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
43%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Udinese
compared with their other 8 matches this season
Progressive carries30vs 54
Passes392vs 515
Threat from passing6.60vs 5.14
Field tilt38%vs 56%
Defensive actions163vs 142
Lazio
compared with their other 8 matches this season
Threat from passing4.59vs 6.44
Progressive passes35vs 49
Defensive actions153vs 139
PPDA4.5vs 5.8
Progressive carries38vs 47

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Udinese

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
18%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
43%
Safe / backward
38%
19% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 81% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Lazio

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
8%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
51%
Safe / backward
39%
10% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 90% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Udinese: 2 corners, 0 led to a shot; Lazio: 8 corners, 2 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Udinese

2Corners
0Led to a shot
3Free kicks, their half
0Set-piece shots
0.00Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
50%1 corner50%1 corner1 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Lazio

8Corners
2Led to a shot
5Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.14Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
38%12%1 corner12%1 corner38%4 from the left flag4 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Udinese
Lazio

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report