Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-09-12

Genoa v Frosinone

1.781.72expected goals
1.342.40xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (1.78 – 1.72 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Genoa
Frosinone
Possession (share of passes)
44.2%55.8%
Duels
7263
Duels won
50.0%49.2%
Aerial duels
4646
Aerial duels won
2323
Successful dribbles
79
Passes
322407
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Genoa above the line, Frosinone below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.921.842.76Kingsley Ehizibue — save, 0.02 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — goal, 0.15 xGKingsley Ehizibue — save, 0.05 xGTommaso Baldanzi — save, 0.13 xGLeo Østigård — miss, 0.07 xGLeo Østigård — save, 0.03 xGGiacomo Calò — save, 0.02 xGPatrizio Masini — miss, 0.02 xGKingsley Ehizibue — miss, 0.04 xGMilutin Osmajic — miss, 0.12 xGGiacomo Calò — miss, 0.04 xGTommaso Baldanzi — save, 0.05 xGLorenzo Colombo — miss, 0.79 xGFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.13 xGAntonio Raimondo — save, 0.20 xGGabriele Calvani — save, 0.07 xGJohan Vásquez — goal, 0.07 xGFarès Ghedjemis — miss, 0.04 xGJunior Messias — save, 0.02 xGJunior Messias — save, 0.04 xGAnthony Oyono — save, 0.06 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.04 xGAnthony Oyono — miss, 0.06 xGJohan Vásquez — miss, 0.05 xGLorenzo Colombo — save, 0.04 xGPatrizio Masini — miss, 0.03 xGLuis Hasa — save, 0.04 xGIlario Monterisi — miss, 0.09 xGPatrizio Masini — save, 0.02 xGAnthony Oyono — save, 0.03 xGLuis Hasa — save, 0.09 xGVítinha — save, 0.15 xGEthan Meichtry — save, 0.06 xGJunior Messias — save, 0.03 xGGiacomo Calò — miss, 0.09 xGGiacomo Calò — save, 0.11 xGAlessio Zerbin — save, 0.04 xGGiacomo Calò — save, 0.08 xGTomás Bobcek — save, 0.05 xGGabriele Bracaglia — save, 0.06 xGGabriele Bracaglia — save, 0.07 xGLuis Hasa — save, 0.02 xGAlessio Zerbin — save, 0.08 xG1.781.72Kingsley Ehizibue — save, 0.06 xGOTGiorgi Kvernadze — goal, 0.39 xGOTKingsley Ehizibue — save, 0.20 xGOTTommaso Baldanzi — save, 0.18 xGOTLeo Østigård — save, 0.02 xGOTGiacomo Calò — save, 0.02 xGOTTommaso Baldanzi — save, 0.03 xGOTFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.04 xGOTAntonio Raimondo — save, 0.07 xGOTGabriele Calvani — save, 0.23 xGOTJohan Vásquez — goal, 0.16 xGOTJunior Messias — save, 0.02 xGOTJunior Messias — save, 0.09 xGOTAnthony Oyono — save, 0.02 xGOTGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.02 xGOTLorenzo Colombo — save, 0.22 xGOTLuis Hasa — save, 0.26 xGOTPatrizio Masini — save, 0.05 xGOTAnthony Oyono — save, 0.04 xGOTLuis Hasa — save, 0.03 xGOTVítinha — save, 0.12 xGOTEthan Meichtry — save, 0.19 xGOTJunior Messias — save, 0.07 xGOTGiacomo Calò — save, 0.32 xGOTAlessio Zerbin — save, 0.17 xGOTGiacomo Calò — save, 0.09 xGOTTomás Bobcek — save, 0.08 xGOTGabriele Bracaglia — save, 0.07 xGOTGabriele Bracaglia — save, 0.11 xGOTLuis Hasa — save, 0.35 xGOTAlessio Zerbin — save, 0.03 xGOT1.342.400'15'30'45'60'75'90'
GenoaFrosinonesolid = xG43 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Genoa
Frosinone

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Genoa or Frosinone got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 2 of 2 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Genoa

The question
When Genoa has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Genoa's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 23.9% of the time on the ball24%Progression: 37.4% of the time on the ball37%Chance creation: 37.6% of the time on the ball38%Attacking transition: 1.1% of the time on the ball38%CHANCE CREATION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up23.9%
Progression37.4%
Chance creation37.6%
Attacking transition1.1%
Vision AI Model Insight
Chance creation is where Genoa spends most of its time on the ball (38% of its time on the ball).

Frosinone

The question
When Frosinone has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Frosinone's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 13.8% of the time on the ball14%Progression: 30.0% of the time on the ball30%Chance creation: 53.1% of the time on the ball53%Attacking transition: 3.1% of the time on the ball53%CHANCE CREATION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up13.8%
Progression30.0%
Chance creation53.1%
Attacking transition3.1%
Vision AI Model Insight
Chance creation is where Frosinone spends most of its time on the ball (53% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Genoa
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Frosinone
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Genoa — 484 touches
Frosinone — 611 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Genoa

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Genoa actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
322
ACTIONS
5%4%16%5%5%8%9%8%5%7%6%5%3%6%8%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
70
ACTIONS
3%3%10%10%7%16%9%10%4%3%7%4%10%4%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (14.5% of all actions). 64% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 36% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 33% defensive, 39% middle, 29% attacking.

Frosinone

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Frosinone actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
407
ACTIONS
2%2%10%3%4%12%6%10%4%7%16%10%2%3%8%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
71
ACTIONS
3%10%4%6%10%8%10%3%6%21%8%1%10%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the right wing of the attacking third (16.5% of all actions). 50% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 50% down the two wings — a wing-oriented build. By third: 22% defensive, 39% middle, 39% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Genoa
34%Left side29%Middle37%Right sideATTACKING →
L
34%29%37%
R
Frosinone
29%Left side24%Middle47%Right sideATTACKING →
L
29%24%47%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Genoa — 34 entries, 32% through the right half-space
Left wing: 5 entries (15%)515%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 7 entries (21%)721%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 6 entries (18%)618%CENTRERight half-space: 11 entries (32%)1132%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 5 entries (15%)515%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Frosinone — 38 entries, 29% through the right wing
Left wing: 8 entries (21%)821%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 5 entries (13%)513%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 5 entries (13%)513%CENTRERight half-space: 9 entries (24%)924%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 11 entries (29%)1129%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Genoa

The football question
How does Genoa progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

110build-up passes attempted
55%completed
22%reach the middle third
12%go long into the final third

Pass types

22CB · 37%
4Long Wide · 7%
9Long Central · 15%
18Wide → FB · 30%
7Central · 12%
CB22 · 37%
left: 13 passes, most from Vásquez13right: 9 passes, most from Vásquez9
Long Wide4 · 7%
left: 2 passes, most from Bijlow2right: 2 passes, most from Bijlow2
Long Central9 · 15%
right: 5 passes, most from Bijlow5left: 4 passes, most from Bijlow4
Wide → FB18 · 30%
right: 10 passes, most from Bijlow10left: 8 passes, most from Bijlow8
Central7 · 12%
right: 4 passes, most from Ellertsson4left: 3 passes, most from Ellertsson3
◆ Vision AI Insight
Genoa build predominantly down the right, with Bijlow as the fulcrum (20 build-up passes). Only 33% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (5×).

Frosinone

The football question
How does Frosinone progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

87build-up passes attempted
71%completed
26%reach the middle third
3%go long into the final third

Pass types

29CB · 47%
3Long Wide · 5%
23Wide → FB · 37%
7Central · 11%
CB29 · 47%
left: 17 passes, most from Cittadini17right: 12 passes, most from Calvani12
Long Wide3 · 5%
right: 2 passes, most from Palmisani2
Wide → FB23 · 37%
left: 17 passes, most from Palmisani17right: 6 passes, most from Oyono6
Central7 · 11%
left: 5 passes, most from Calò5right: 2 passes, most from Calò2
◆ Vision AI Insight
Frosinone build predominantly down the left, with Palmisani as the fulcrum (13 build-up passes). Only 29% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (7×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Genoa

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 42 progressive passes across 1 match (42.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
29%
Right half-space
12%
Central
24%
Left half-space
14%
Left wing
21%
Progression is right-dominant: 40% right side · 24% central · 36% left.

Who generates it

Justin Bijlow
11 · 26%
Johan Vásquez
6 · 14%
Djibril Sow
5 · 12%
Junior Messias
4 · 10%
Kingsley Ehizibue
3 · 7%
Top two — Justin Bijlow & Johan Vásquez — account for 40% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
42.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
38% reach final third
26% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 62% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 38% of progressive passes reached the final third and 26% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 40% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingsterile

Frosinone

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 51 progressive passes across 1 match (51.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
39%
Right half-space
16%
Central
10%
Left half-space
6%
Left wing
29%
Progression is right-dominant: 55% right side · 10% central · 35% left.

Who generates it

Giacomo Calò
14 · 27%
Gabriele Bracaglia
6 · 12%
Anthony Oyono
6 · 12%
Ilario Monterisi
6 · 12%
Seydou Fini
4 · 8%
Top two — Giacomo Calò & Gabriele Bracaglia — account for 39% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
51.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
25% reach final third
24% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 75% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 25% of progressive passes reached the final third and 24% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 39% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Genoa

The question
Where do Genoa's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

17shots
1.8xG
0.10xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 2 shots (12%)12%2Settled attack: 8 shots (47%)47%8Set piece: 7 shots (41%)41%717SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 12% of shots200.200.10
Pass into the box / short pass100.150.15
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.040.04
Settled attack 47% of shots800.530.07
Cross100.120.12
Long ball100.030.03
Pass into the box / short pass500.330.07
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.050.05
Set piece 41% of shots711.060.15
Corner510.240.05
Free kick100.020.02
Penalty100.790.79

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Junior Messias20.190
Alessandro Marcandalli20.170
Lorenzo Colombo10.130
Johan Vásquez10.060
Milutin Osmajic10.050

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Lorenzo Colombo20.830
Tommaso Baldanzi20.180
Vítinha10.150
Johan Vásquez20.121
Milutin Osmajic10.120
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Genoa's chances, by xG, is set piece (1.1 of 1.8 xG, 7 of 17 shots), mostly penalty. 2 of the 17 shots (12%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 7 of the 17 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 1.8 xG (-0.8).

Frosinone

The question
Where do Frosinone's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

26shots
1.7xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 6 shots (23%)23%6Settled attack: 11 shots (42%)42%11Set piece: 9 shots (35%)35%926SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 23% of shots600.620.10
Pass into the box / short pass600.620.10
Settled attack 42% of shots1110.720.07
Cross200.160.08
Pass into the box / short pass710.470.07
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.090.04
Set piece 35% of shots900.390.04
Corner800.370.05
Free kick100.020.02

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Giorgi Kvernadze50.570
Seydou Fini30.220
Romano Schmid10.151
Tomás Bobcek10.080
Luis Hasa20.080

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Giacomo Calò50.330
Antonio Raimondo10.200
Giorgi Kvernadze20.191
Farès Ghedjemis20.180
Anthony Oyono30.160
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Frosinone's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.7 of 1.7 xG, 11 of 26 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 6 of the 26 shots (23%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 9 of the 26 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 1.7 xG (-0.7).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Genoa

The question
How does Genoa deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

16 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (25%), 1 led to a shot (6%). 2 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Frosinone

The question
How does Frosinone deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

15 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (27%), 2 led to a shot (13%). 4 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (25%), 1 led to a shot (25%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Genoa

The question
Which part of the final third does Genoa actually cross from?

16 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (6%)6%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (6%)6%1advanced right wing: 7 crosses (44%)44%7advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 3 crosses (19%)19%3byline right wing: 2 crosses (12%)12%2byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 2 crosses (12%)12%2
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing744%0
advanced · left wing319%0
byline · right wing212%1
byline · left wing212%0
deep · right wing16%0
deep · left wing16%0

Frosinone

The question
Which part of the final third does Frosinone actually cross from?

15 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 4 crosses (27%)27%4advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 0 crosses (0%)byline right wing: 5 crosses (33%)33%5byline right half-space: 2 crosses (13%)13%2byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 4 crosses (27%)27%4
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing533%1
advanced · right wing427%1
byline · left wing427%0
byline · right half-space213%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+1.64Genoa on-ball value
+1.75Frosinone on-ball value
+0.0+0.9+1.8HALF TIME+1.64+1.750′15′30′45′60′75′90′
GenoaFrosinoneEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Genoa — where the value came from
Passes322 actions-0.30
Carries70 actions+0.23
Dribbles15 actions+0.01
Shots17 actions+1.48
Ball wins49 actions+0.22
Frosinone — where the value came from
Passes407 actions+0.75
Carries71 actions-0.22
Dribbles24 actions+0.06
Shots26 actions+0.91
Ball wins53 actions+0.25
Genoa — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Lorenzo Colombo19+0.814
Junior Messias30+0.277
Tommaso Baldanzi17+0.258
Kingsley Ehizibue38+0.177
Vítinha13+0.145
Stephan El Shaarawy (lowest)16-0.310
Frosinone — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Giorgi Kvernadze28+0.347
Farès Ghedjemis44+0.335
Giacomo Calò98+0.244
Seydou Fini25+0.149
Ilario Monterisi19+0.135
Patrizio Masini (lowest)58-0.025
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Genoa

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

11 of 16 pass attempts lost here (69%).69%11/16Marcandall12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.23 of 50 pass attempts lost here (46%).46%23/50Bijlow3 of 15 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%3/15Vásquez11 of 17 pass attempts lost here (65%).65%11/17Vásquez6 of 25 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%6/25Marcandall4 of 29 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%4/29Ehizibue11 of 27 pass attempts lost here (41%).41%11/27Sow6 of 16 pass attempts lost here (38%).38%6/16Colombo10 of 23 pass attempts lost here (43%).43%10/23Vásquez12 of 20 pass attempts lost here (60%).60%12/20Ehizibue5 of 17 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%5/17Ehizibue10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 20 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%6/20Ellertsson13 of 25 pass attempts lost here (52%).52%13/25Sowattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
42
Failed forward pass
31
Failed take-on
8
Lost in the defensive third
50
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 69% of 16 pass attempts there are lost (11 times). Separately, 33% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Frosinone

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.13 of 41 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%13/41Palmisani13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 17 pass attempts lost here (35%).35%6/17Palmisani8 of 50 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%8/50Calò5 of 26 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%5/26Schmid8 of 39 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%8/39Schmid4 of 17 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%4/17Masini10 of 30 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%10/30Bracaglia12 of 64 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%12/64Calò11 of 39 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%11/39Ghedjemis10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.10 of 34 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%10/34Calòattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
36
Failed forward pass
25
Failed take-on
15
Lost in the defensive third
25
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 35% of 17 pass attempts there are lost (6 times). Separately, 38% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Genoa

Not just press intensity, but where the 171 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
16%
Middle third
36%
Own third
48%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.0 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 16% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 36% in midfield.

Where they win it back

1672415201571114155964DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

Frosinone

Not just press intensity, but where the 186 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
13%
Middle third
43%
Own third
44%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 2.6 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 13% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 43% in midfield.

Where they win it back

121236129151819121696DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Genoa

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Genoa win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 23 opposition possessions that Genoa ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
2.8passes
median 2 · before Genoa win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
8sec
median 7s · 23.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
61%
35%
4%
0–2 passes3–5 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
2.8
8s
15–30′
4.0
9s
30–45+′
2.8
5s
45–60′

too few
60–75′

too few
75–90+′
2.1
6s
average passesaverage seconds

Frosinone

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Frosinone win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 24 opposition possessions that Frosinone ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
3.3passes
median 2 · before Frosinone win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
11sec
median 3s · 24.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
58%
21%
8%
12%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′

too few
15–30′
4.0
18s
30–45+′
2.7
8s
45–60′
2.0
7s
60–75′

too few
75–90+′
3.1
8s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Genoa — 171 actions, 123 won
Frosinone — 186 actions, 142 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Genoa — 85 wins · 6% in the final third, 26% midfield, 68% own third
own third, right: 15 of 85 wins (18%)18%15 winsown third, centre: 21 of 85 wins (25%)25%21 winsown third, left: 22 of 85 wins (26%)26%22 winsmidfield, right: 7 of 85 wins (8%)8%7 winsmidfield, centre: 3 of 85 wins (4%)4%3 winsmidfield, left: 12 of 85 wins (14%)14%12 winsfinal third, right: 4 of 85 wins (5%)5%4 winsfinal third, centre: 0 of 85 wins (0%)final third, left: 1 of 85 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Lorenzo Colombotackle35′98
Kingsley Ehizibuetackle52′95
Johan Vásqueztackle5′86
Junior Messiastackle57′85
Djibril Sowball-recovery36′71
Frosinone — 100 wins · 9% in the final third, 35% midfield, 56% own third
own third, right: 16 of 100 wins (16%)16%16 winsown third, centre: 31 of 100 wins (31%)31%31 winsown third, left: 9 of 100 wins (9%)9%9 winsmidfield, right: 12 of 100 wins (12%)12%12 winsmidfield, centre: 13 of 100 wins (13%)13%13 winsmidfield, left: 10 of 100 wins (10%)10%10 winsfinal third, right: 5 of 100 wins (5%)5%5 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 100 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 3 of 100 wins (3%)3%3 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Tomás Bobcekball-recovery91′91
Giorgi Kvernadzetackle63′87
Farès Ghedjemisball-recovery4′78
Patrizio Masinitackle2′78
Patrizio Masiniball-recovery93′74
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Genoa

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Genoa? 51 opponent progressive passes and 26 shots faced (1.7 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Genoa)

Right wing
45%
Right half-space
13%
Central
11%
Left half-space
6%
Left wing
26%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (45% of the danger conceded).

Frosinone

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Frosinone? 42 opponent progressive passes and 17 shots faced (1.8 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Frosinone)

Right wing
30%
Right half-space
8%
Central
29%
Left half-space
15%
Left wing
18%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (30% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Genoa

Build-up (own third)

slower, trying to break lines, safer

right 24% · centre 52% · left 23%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
132
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+20.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
14%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
42%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
33% of 69
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
64%
Progression (middle third)

trying to break lines, safer, attacking the next line

right 43% · centre 28% · left 29%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
157
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
12%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.1 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
46% of 59
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
46%
Final third

safer, slower, more direct

right 36% · centre 19% · left 46%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
118
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
14%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.1 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
33% of 42
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
48%

Frosinone

Build-up (own third)

safer, less recycling, left-sided

right 18% · centre 53% · left 29%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
106
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+16.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
28%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.4 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
45% of 49
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
55%
Progression (middle third)

safer, less recycling, slower

right 42% · centre 32% · left 27%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
192
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
14%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
45% of 75
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
48%
Final third

safer, right-sided, touchline to touchline

right 64% · centre 8% · left 28%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
204
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.1 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
42% of 50
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
42%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Genoa
compared with their other 8 matches this season
Expected goals1.78vs 0.75
Pass accuracy60%vs 79%
Threat from passing5.97vs 3.18
Progressive carries18vs 53
Passes322vs 438
Frosinone
compared with their other 7 matches this season
PPDA2.6vs 4.2
Field tilt62%vs 48%
Pass accuracy76%vs 72%
Progressive passes51vs 44
Passes407vs 351

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Genoa

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
17%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
54%
Safe / backward
29%
17% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 83% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Frosinone

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
18%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
49%
Safe / backward
31%
20% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 80% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Genoa: 8 corners, 3 led to a shot, 1 set-piece goal; Frosinone: 9 corners, 7 led to a shot.

Genoa

8Corners
3Led to a shot
6Free kicks, their half
6Set-piece shots
0.26Set-piece xG
1Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
12%1 corner88%4 from the left flag4 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Frosinone

9Corners
7Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
9Set-piece shots
0.39Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
11%1 corner44%22%2 corners22%4 from the left flag5 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Genoa
Frosinone

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report