Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-09-19

Roma v Inter

RomaHome
2–2
InterAway
1.722.23expected goals
1.731.75xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (1.72 – 2.23 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Roma
Inter
Possession (share of passes)
49.3%50.7%
Duels
3642
Duels won
36.1%42.9%
Aerial duels
1515
Aerial duels won
69
Successful dribbles
99
Passes
498512
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Roma above the line, Inter below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.861.712.57Manu Koné — goal, 0.17 xGBryan Cristante — save, 0.03 xGPaulo Dybala — miss, 0.06 xGPaulo Dybala — save, 0.10 xGPaulo Dybala — miss, 0.02 xGDonyell Malen — miss, 0.11 xGYann Bisseck — save, 0.12 xGLautaro Martínez — miss, 0.20 xGAlessandro Bastoni — post, 0.06 xGWesley — save, 0.06 xGMatías Soulé — save, 0.06 xGGianluca Mancini — miss, 0.25 xGManu Koné — goal, 0.18 xGMatías Soulé — save, 0.02 xGLautaro Martínez — goal, 0.16 xGLautaro Martínez — save, 0.06 xGDonyell Malen — save, 0.10 xGNahuel Molina — miss, 0.02 xGMarcus Thuram — miss, 0.12 xGNiccolò Pisilli — save, 0.09 xGPaulo Dybala — miss, 0.05 xGPiotr Zielinski — miss, 0.04 xGWesley — save, 0.05 xGBryan Cristante — miss, 0.09 xGDonyell Malen — save, 0.28 xGLuis Henrique — save, 0.05 xGAndy Diouf — save, 0.02 xGLautaro Martínez — miss, 0.06 xGMarcus Thuram — save, 0.19 xGLautaro Martínez — post, 0.52 xGManuel Akanji — miss, 0.37 xGYann Bisseck — save, 0.12 xGLautaro Martínez — goal, 0.11 xGMarcus Thuram — miss, 0.04 xG1.722.23Manu Koné — goal, 0.31 xGOTBryan Cristante — save, 0.03 xGOTPaulo Dybala — save, 0.24 xGOTYann Bisseck — save, 0.41 xGOTWesley — save, 0.16 xGOTMatías Soulé — save, 0.22 xGOTManu Koné — goal, 0.08 xGOTMatías Soulé — save, 0.16 xGOTLautaro Martínez — goal, 0.51 xGOTLautaro Martínez — save, 0.10 xGOTDonyell Malen — save, 0.21 xGOTNiccolò Pisilli — save, 0.07 xGOTWesley — save, 0.07 xGOTDonyell Malen — save, 0.19 xGOTLuis Henrique — save, 0.06 xGOTAndy Diouf — save, 0.18 xGOTMarcus Thuram — save, 0.25 xGOTYann Bisseck — save, 0.06 xGOTLautaro Martínez — goal, 0.17 xGOT1.731.750'15'30'45'60'75'90'
RomaIntersolid = xG34 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Roma
Inter

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Roma or Inter got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 4 of 4 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Roma

The question
When Roma has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Roma's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 15.0% of the time on the ball15%Progression: 41.9% of the time on the ball42%Chance creation: 41.7% of the time on the ball42%Attacking transition: 1.3% of the time on the ball42%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up15.0%
Progression41.9%
Chance creation41.7%
Attacking transition1.3%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Roma spends most of its time on the ball (42% of its time on the ball).

Inter

The question
When Inter has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Inter's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 31.5% of the time on the ball31%Progression: 37.6% of the time on the ball38%Chance creation: 28.0% of the time on the ball28%Attacking transition: 2.9% of the time on the ball38%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up31.5%
Progression37.6%
Chance creation28.0%
Attacking transition2.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Inter spends most of its time on the ball (38% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Roma
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Inter
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Roma — 647 touches
Inter — 658 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Roma

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Roma actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
498
ACTIONS
3%5%9%3%3%10%7%7%7%12%9%6%5%6%9%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
103
ACTIONS
3%4%7%3%3%13%8%6%9%14%12%3%4%6%8%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left wing of the middle third (12.0% of all actions). 54% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 46% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 22% defensive, 44% middle, 35% attacking.

Inter

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Inter actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
512
ACTIONS
3%6%13%6%6%5%7%11%9%9%2%4%3%7%7%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
118
ACTIONS
4%14%8%3%6%7%10%6%12%5%4%3%4%14%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (13.5% of all actions). 66% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 34% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 33% defensive, 41% middle, 25% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Roma leaned on their right (39%); Inter leaned on their left (44%).

Roma
38%Left side23%Middle39%Right sideATTACKING →
L
38%23%39%
R
Inter
44%Left side32%Middle24%Right sideATTACKING →
L
44%32%24%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Roma — 48 entries, 40% through the left wing
Left wing: 19 entries (40%)1940%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 2 entries (4%)24%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 4 entries (8%)48%CENTRERight half-space: 8 entries (17%)817%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 15 entries (31%)1531%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Inter — 54 entries, 39% through the left wing
Left wing: 21 entries (39%)2139%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 11 entries (20%)1120%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 7 entries (13%)713%CENTRERight half-space: 11 entries (20%)1120%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 4 entries (7%)47%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Roma

The football question
How does Roma progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

110build-up passes attempted
77%completed
36%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

30CB · 35%
15Long Wide · 18%
30Wide → FB · 35%
10Central · 12%

Sequence success — build-up

17build-up sequences in this match
18%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
24%turned over with nothing to show
CB30 · 35%
right: 17 passes, most from Balerdi17left: 13 passes, most from Hermoso13
Long Wide15 · 18%
right: 11 passes, most from Svilar11left: 4 passes, most from Svilar4
Wide → FB30 · 35%
left: 16 passes, most from Svilar16right: 14 passes, most from Svilar14
Central10 · 12%
left: 5 passes, most from Wesley5right: 5 passes, most from Cristante5
◆ Vision AI Insight
Roma build predominantly down the right, with Svilar as the fulcrum (22 build-up passes). Only 38% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → C def (6×).

Inter

The football question
How does Inter progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

176build-up passes attempted
86%completed
32%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

45CB · 30%
10Long Wide · 7%
2Long Central · 1%
70Wide → FB · 46%
25Central · 16%

Sequence success — build-up

23build-up sequences in this match
17%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
57%turned over with nothing to show
CB45 · 30%
right: 31 passes, most from Akanji31left: 14 passes, most from Akanji14
Long Wide10 · 7%
left: 8 passes, most from Martínez8right: 2 passes, most from Dimarco2
Long Central2 · 1%
Wide → FB70 · 46%
left: 45 passes, most from Martínez45right: 25 passes, most from Martínez25
Central25 · 16%
left: 14 passes, most from Martínez14right: 11 passes, most from Bastoni11
◆ Vision AI Insight
Inter build predominantly down the left, with Martínez as the fulcrum (37 build-up passes). Only 34% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → C def (13×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Roma

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 46 progressive passes across 1 match (46.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
37%
Right half-space
20%
Central
15%
Left half-space
7%
Left wing
22%
Progression is right-dominant: 57% right side · 15% central · 28% left.

Who generates it

Paulo Dybala
11 · 24%
Wesley
9 · 20%
Matías Soulé
7 · 15%
Bryan Cristante
6 · 13%
Nahuel Molina
4 · 9%
Top two — Paulo Dybala & Wesley — account for 43% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
46.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
24% reach final third
28% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 76% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 24% of progressive passes reached the final third and 28% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 43% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spaceefficient
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingsterile

Inter

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 65 progressive passes across 1 match (65.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
17%
Right half-space
20%
Central
9%
Left half-space
11%
Left wing
43%
Progression is left-dominant: 37% right side · 9% central · 54% left.

Who generates it

Nicolò Barella
11 · 17%
Alessandro Bastoni
8 · 12%
Federico Dimarco
8 · 12%
Yann Bisseck
6 · 9%
Lautaro Martínez
6 · 9%
Top two — Nicolò Barella & Alessandro Bastoni — account for 29% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
65.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
28% reach final third
25% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 72% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 28% of progressive passes reached the final third and 25% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 29% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Roma

The question
Where do Roma's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

18shots
1.7xG
0.10xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 7 shots (39%)39%7Settled attack: 8 shots (44%)44%8Set piece: 3 shots (17%)17%318SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 39% of shots700.510.07
Cut-back100.100.10
Long ball100.100.10
Pass into the box / short pass200.200.10
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)300.120.04
Settled attack 44% of shots820.830.10
Cross100.050.05
Cut-back110.170.17
Pass into the box / short pass510.550.11
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.060.06
Set piece 17% of shots300.390.13
Corner300.390.13

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Paulo Dybala50.681
Nahuel Molina20.231
Donyell Malen30.220
Matías Soulé10.020

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Donyell Malen30.480
Manu Koné20.352
Gianluca Mancini10.250
Paulo Dybala40.220
Bryan Cristante20.130
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Roma's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.8 of 1.7 xG, 8 of 18 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 7 of the 18 shots (39%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 18 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 1.7 xG (+0.3).

Inter

The question
Where do Inter's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

16shots
2.2xG
0.14xG per shot
2big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (19%)19%3Settled attack: 8 shots (50%)50%8Set piece: 5 shots (31%)31%516SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 19% of shots310.250.08
Cross100.060.06
Cut-back110.160.16
Pass into the box / short pass100.040.04
Settled attack 50% of shots800.670.08
Cross100.120.12
Long ball100.120.12
Pass into the box / short pass500.230.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.200.20
Set piece 31% of shots511.310.26
Corner511.310.26

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Marcus Thuram10.161
Carlos Augusto10.120
Curtis Jones20.120
Lautaro Martínez10.120
Nicolò Barella20.100

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Lautaro Martínez61.112
Manuel Akanji10.370
Marcus Thuram30.350
Yann Bisseck20.240
Alessandro Bastoni10.060
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Inter's chances, by xG, is set piece (1.3 of 2.2 xG, 5 of 16 shots), mostly corner. 3 of the 16 shots (19%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 5 of the 16 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 2.2 xG (-0.2).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Roma

The question
How does Roma deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

15 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (27%), 1 led to a shot (7%). 8 cut-backs: 5 found a team-mate (62%), 2 led to a shot (25%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Inter

The question
How does Inter deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

15 crosses: 9 found a team-mate (60%), 2 led to a shot (13%). 2 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (100%), 1 led to a shot (50%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Roma

The question
Which part of the final third does Roma actually cross from?

15 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 3 crosses (20%)20%3deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 2 crosses (13%)13%2advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 1 crosses (7%)7%1advanced left wing: 1 crosses (7%)7%1byline right wing: 5 crosses (33%)33%5byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 3 crosses (20%)20%3
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing533%1
deep · right wing320%0
byline · left wing320%0
advanced · right wing213%0
advanced · left half-space17%0
advanced · left wing17%0

Inter

The question
Which part of the final third does Inter actually cross from?

15 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 2 crosses (13%)13%2advanced right wing: 3 crosses (20%)20%3advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 3 crosses (20%)20%3byline right wing: 0 crosses (0%)byline right half-space: 2 crosses (13%)13%2byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 5 crosses (33%)33%5
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing533%1
advanced · right wing320%1
advanced · left wing320%0
deep · left wing213%0
byline · right half-space213%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+1.84Roma on-ball value
+1.80Inter on-ball value
+0.0+1.1+2.1HALF TIME+1.84+1.800′15′30′45′60′75′90′
RomaInterEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Roma — where the value came from
Passes498 actions+0.75
Carries103 actions+0.01
Dribbles15 actions+0.02
Shots18 actions+0.66
Ball wins72 actions+0.41
Inter — where the value came from
Passes512 actions+0.34
Carries118 actions+0.19
Dribbles15 actions+0.01
Shots16 actions+0.91
Ball wins56 actions+0.35
Roma — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Paulo Dybala82+1.190
Matías Soulé84+0.390
Evan Ndicka23+0.148
Nahuel Molina54+0.147
Donyell Malen35+0.134
Manu Koné (lowest)52-0.242
Inter — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Lautaro Martínez45+0.739
Yann Bisseck70+0.356
Andy Diouf55+0.242
Marcus Thuram36+0.221
Josep Martínez57+0.106
Nicolò Barella (lowest)76-0.136
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Roma

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 of 23 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%3/23Svilar12 of 47 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%12/47Svilar13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.11 of 49 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%11/49Wesley5 of 35 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%5/35Malen6 of 35 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%6/35Balerdi2 of 35 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%2/35Hermoso3 of 58 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%3/58Hermoso7 of 45 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%7/45Wesley4 of 32 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%4/32Balerdi6 of 23 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%6/23Cristante7 of 30 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%7/30Soulé10 of 46 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%10/46Souléattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
34
Failed forward pass
22
Failed take-on
6
Lost in the defensive third
25
Their weakest zone is the central in the attacking third: 26% of 23 pass attempts there are lost (6 times). Separately, 40% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Inter

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

1 of 15 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%1/15Bisseck4 of 31 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%4/31Barella12 of 69 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%12/69Martínez3 of 29 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%3/29Dimarco4 of 32 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%4/32Dimarco2 of 27 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%2/27Bisseck8 of 37 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%8/37Bisseck9 of 55 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%9/55Bisseck5 of 47 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%5/47Thuram9 of 47 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%9/47Thuram10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 of 22 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%3/22Diouf3 of 17 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%3/17Zielinski9 of 36 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%9/36Martínez3 of 38 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%3/38Dimarcoattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
20
Failed forward pass
13
Failed take-on
6
Lost in the defensive third
24
Their weakest zone is the left half-space in the attacking third: 25% of 36 pass attempts there are lost (9 times). Separately, 26% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Roma

Not just press intensity, but where the 148 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
12%
Middle third
45%
Own third
43%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.4 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 12% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 45% in midfield.

Where they win it back

91232912121915966DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

Inter

Not just press intensity, but where the 134 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
10%
Middle third
34%
Own third
57%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 6.7 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 10% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 34% in midfield.

Where they win it back

20122311106998138DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Roma

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Roma win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 37 opposition possessions that Roma ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
6.9passes
median 4 · before Roma win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
23sec
median 12s · 37.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
27%
30%
19%
24%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
8.5
32s
15–30′
4.8
16s
30–45+′
7.0
26s
45–60′
11.0
34s
60–75′
8.0
22s
75–90+′
5.0
15s
average passesaverage seconds

Inter

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Inter win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 33 opposition possessions that Inter ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.9passes
median 3 · before Inter win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
15sec
median 8s · 33.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
36%
30%
24%
9%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
8.1
27s
15–30′
4.3
13s
30–45+′
7.0
20s
45–60′
5.2
16s
60–75′
3.0
8s
75–90+′
1.9
6s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Roma — 148 actions, 112 won
Inter — 134 actions, 103 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Roma — 93 wins · 5% in the final third, 39% midfield, 56% own third
own third, right: 15 of 93 wins (16%)16%15 winsown third, centre: 29 of 93 wins (31%)31%29 winsown third, left: 8 of 93 wins (9%)9%8 winsmidfield, right: 12 of 93 wins (13%)13%12 winsmidfield, centre: 17 of 93 wins (18%)18%17 winsmidfield, left: 7 of 93 wins (8%)8%7 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 93 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 2 of 93 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, left: 2 of 93 wins (2%)2%2 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Donyell Malenball-recovery17′82
Bryan Cristanteball-recovery24′71
Paulo Dybalaball-recovery52′70
Mario Hermosoball-recovery26′68
Nahuel Molinaball-recovery15′67
Inter — 76 wins · 3% in the final third, 26% midfield, 71% own third
own third, right: 19 of 76 wins (25%)25%19 winsown third, centre: 25 of 76 wins (33%)33%25 winsown third, left: 10 of 76 wins (13%)13%10 winsmidfield, right: 6 of 76 wins (8%)8%6 winsmidfield, centre: 5 of 76 wins (7%)7%5 winsmidfield, left: 9 of 76 wins (12%)12%9 winsfinal third, right: 0 of 76 wins (0%)final third, centre: 0 of 76 wins (0%)final third, left: 2 of 76 wins (3%)3%2 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Nicolò Barellaball-recovery95′74
Ange-Yoan Bonnytackle95′73
Piotr Zielinskiball-recovery67′62
Nicolò Barellaball-recovery80′60
Yann Bissecktackle75′59
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Roma

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Roma? 65 opponent progressive passes and 16 shots faced (2.2 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Roma)

Right wing
16%
Right half-space
21%
Central
10%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
42%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (42% of the danger conceded).

Inter

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Inter? 46 opponent progressive passes and 18 shots faced (1.7 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Inter)

Right wing
38%
Right half-space
22%
Central
14%
Left half-space
9%
Left wing
18%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (38% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Roma

Build-up (own third)

safer, longer passing, narrow, central

right 29% · centre 50% · left 21%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
131
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+13.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
35%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
57% of 51
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
43%
Progression (middle third)

safer, touchline to touchline, played in the channels

right 38% · centre 20% · left 42%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
268
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
61% of 64
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
38%
Final third

safer, narrow, central

right 41% · centre 17% · left 42%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
217
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
6%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
27% of 49
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
55%

Inter

Build-up (own third)

safer, slower, left-sided

right 21% · centre 50% · left 30%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
212
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+9.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
17%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
60% of 63
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
38%
Progression (middle third)

safer, slower, left-sided

right 27% · centre 35% · left 38%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
267
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+5.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
12%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
52% of 65
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
42%
Final third

safer, played inside, left-sided

right 23% · centre 16% · left 60%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
166
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
27% of 37
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
57%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Roma
compared with their other 8 matches this season
Progressive carries42vs 59
Passes498vs 595
Threat from passing5.60vs 7.76
Final-third entries48vs 58
Defensive actions148vs 155
Inter
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Field tilt42%vs 73%
Passes512vs 679
PPDA6.7vs 4.3
Progressive carries46vs 68
Pass accuracy85%vs 89%

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Roma

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
15%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
48%
Safe / backward
36%
16% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 84% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Inter

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
17%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
46%
Safe / backward
35%
19% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 81% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Roma: 4 corners, 2 led to a shot; Inter: 2 corners, 1 led to a shot, 1 set-piece goal.

Roma

4Corners
2Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.39Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
50%25%25%1 from the left flag3 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Inter

2Corners
1Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
5Set-piece shots
1.31Set-piece xG
1Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
100%1 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Roma
Inter

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report