Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Bologna above the line, Torino below.
xG race
Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places. Switch to xGOT (xG on target) to count only the shots that tested the goalkeeper, valued by where they went in the goal mouth, or Both to see the two together.
Show
BolognaTorinosolid = xG25 shots — click any dot
Shot map
Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.
Bologna
Torino
Goal sequences
The move behind each goal, from the moment Bologna or Torino got the ball to the finish. Pick a goal, then step through it or press Play: numbered circles are passes and touches, dotted lines are carries (the ball travelling with a player), dashed grey is a pass that was lost, the star is the shot.
PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 2 of 2 goals traced.
In possession
In possession
How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.
When Bologna has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?
The share of Bologna's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen. A phase is where the ball is on the pitch (own third, middle third, final third); a transition or a set piece skips the build-up and is counted on its own.
Phase
Share of the time
Build-up
36.6%
Progression
39.8%
Chance creation
23.6%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Bologna spends most of its time on the ball (40% of its time on the ball).
Torino
The question
When Torino has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?
The share of Torino's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen. A phase is where the ball is on the pitch (own third, middle third, final third); a transition or a set piece skips the build-up and is counted on its own.
Phase
Share of the time
Build-up
31.1%
Progression
49.2%
Chance creation
19.2%
Attacking transition
0.5%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Torino spends most of its time on the ball (49% of its time on the ball).
Passing Network
Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links. Lines are this match's passes between two players, thicker for more.
Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed). Eight families per team — click any map to open it wide, then filter by channel or third, from one to another (or click a cell of the flow grids), by outcome, half, minute and passer. Channels: right wing, right half-space, centre, left half-space, left wing.
From channel
To channel
From third
To third
Outcome · half
Minutes
Channel to channel · click a cell
Third to third · click a cell
Touch Density
Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.
Bologna — 501 touches
Torino — 650 touches
Which Zones Do They Attack Through?
Bologna
The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Bologna actually do its on-ball work?
Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other. Each is binned into the 15 pitch zones (three thirds × five vertical lanes) and shaded by its share of that kind of action; the arrows are the real actions.
Passes
the ball moved by a pass
355
ACTIONS
Carries
the ball moved with a player
61
ACTIONS
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the right wing of the middle third (16.1% of all actions). 56% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 44% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 38% defensive, 44% middle, 18% attacking.
Torino
The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Torino actually do its on-ball work?
Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other. Each is binned into the 15 pitch zones (three thirds × five vertical lanes) and shaded by its share of that kind of action; the arrows are the real actions.
Passes
the ball moved by a pass
512
ACTIONS
Carries
the ball moved with a player
140
ACTIONS
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (15.0% of all actions). 68% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 32% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 33% defensive, 49% middle, 18% attacking.
Attack sides
Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Bologna leaned on their right (41%); Torino spread it evenly (no channel above 34%).
Bologna
L
35%24%41%
R
Torino
L
32%34%34%
R
Final-third entries
Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.
Bologna — 25 entries, 36% through the left wing
Torino — 32 entries, 31% through the centre
Build-up1 section
Build-Up — the pass map
Bologna
The football question
How does Bologna progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?
Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central. Each gets its own panel below, so nothing competes for attention. Arrow width = volume, labelled with the exact count; hover for the top passer.
139build-up passes attempted
63%completed
20%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third
Pass types
29CB · 33%
11Long Wide · 13%
3Long Central · 3%
35Wide → FB · 40%
9Central · 10%
Sequence success — build-up
39build-up sequences in this match
0%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
64%turned over with nothing to show
CB29 · 33%
Long Wide11 · 13%
Long Central3 · 3%
Wide → FB35 · 40%
Central9 · 10%
◆ Vision AI Insight
Bologna build predominantly down the right, with Skorupski as the fulcrum (24 build-up passes). Only 22% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (11×).
Torino
The football question
How does Torino progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?
Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central. Each gets its own panel below, so nothing competes for attention. Arrow width = volume, labelled with the exact count; hover for the top passer.
161build-up passes attempted
80%completed
20%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third
Pass types
76CB · 59%
3Long Wide · 2%
1Long Central · 1%
38Wide → FB · 30%
10Central · 8%
Sequence success — build-up
19build-up sequences in this match
16%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
42%turned over with nothing to show
CB76 · 59%
Long Wide3 · 2%
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB38 · 30%
Central10 · 8%
◆ Vision AI Insight
Torino build predominantly down the right, with Cömert as the fulcrum (31 build-up passes). Only 21% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (19×).
Progression1 section
How They Progress — the mechanism
Bologna
Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 37 progressive passes across 1 match (37.0/game).
Origin lane
Right wing
38%
Right half-space
14%
Central
22%
Left half-space
3%
Left wing
24%
Progression is right-dominant: 51% right side · 22% central · 27% left.
Who generates it
Juan Miranda
8 · 22%
Lukasz Skorupski
7 · 19%
Federico Bernardeschi
5 · 14%
Emil Holm
4 · 11%
Eivind Helland
2 · 5%
Top two — Juan Miranda & Lukasz Skorupski — account for 41% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
37.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
27% reach final third
14% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 73% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it.27% of progressive passes reached the final third and 14% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 41% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.
Which lanes actually create the threat
Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.
Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient
Torino
Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 49 progressive passes across 1 match (49.0/game).
Origin lane
Right wing
20%
Right half-space
14%
Central
20%
Left half-space
27%
Left wing
18%
Progression is left-dominant: 35% right side · 20% central · 45% left.
Who generates it
Saúl Coco
6 · 12%
Rolando Mandragora
6 · 12%
Nathan Patterson
6 · 12%
Eray Cömert
5 · 10%
Ardian Ismajli
3 · 6%
Top two — Saúl Coco & Rolando Mandragora — account for 24% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
49.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
24% reach final third
29% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 76% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it.24% of progressive passes reached the final third and 29% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 24% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.
Which lanes actually create the threat
Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.
Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacesterile
Centralsterile
Left half-spaceefficient
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections
Chance creation — how the shots come
Bologna
The question
Where do Bologna's chances actually come from?
Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece. Then by how it was set up: a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box, or no pass at all (the player created it himself). So a cut-back from an attacking transition is counted apart from a cut-back in a settled attack.
11shots
0.7xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set up
Shots
Goals
xG
xG / shot
Attacking transition55% of shots
6
1
0.40
0.07
Cross
2
0
0.12
0.06
Pass into the box / short pass
2
0
0.07
0.04
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)
2
1
0.21
0.11
Settled attack27% of shots
3
0
0.22
0.07
Cross
2
0
0.17
0.08
Long ball
1
0
0.05
0.05
Set piece18% of shots
2
0
0.10
0.05
Corner
1
0
0.06
0.06
Free kick
1
0
0.04
0.04
Every attempt to create — and what came of it
Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.
Who sets the shots up
Player
Set-ups
xG created
Goals
Juan Miranda
4
0.28
0
Roberto Piccoli
1
0.05
0
Nikola Moro
1
0.05
0
Nicolò Cambiaghi
1
0.03
0
Who takes them
Player
Shots
xG
Goals
Federico Bernardeschi
4
0.33
1
Roberto Piccoli
3
0.20
0
Tommaso Pobega
2
0.12
0
Juan Miranda
1
0.05
0
Arthur Theate
1
0.03
0
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Bologna's chances, by xG, is attacking transition (0.4 of 0.7 xG, 6 of 11 shots), mostly own creation (carry, dribble, rebound). 6 of the 11 shots (55%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 11 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 0.7 xG (+0.3).
Torino
The question
Where do Torino's chances actually come from?
Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece. Then by how it was set up: a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box, or no pass at all (the player created it himself). So a cut-back from an attacking transition is counted apart from a cut-back in a settled attack.
14shots
0.8xG
0.06xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set up
Shots
Goals
xG
xG / shot
Attacking transition14% of shots
2
0
0.12
0.06
Pass into the box / short pass
2
0
0.12
0.06
Settled attack43% of shots
6
1
0.41
0.07
Cross
1
0
0.03
0.03
Cut-back
1
0
0.14
0.14
Pass into the box / short pass
4
1
0.24
0.06
Set piece43% of shots
6
0
0.25
0.04
Corner
4
0
0.17
0.04
Free kick
2
0
0.07
0.04
Every attempt to create — and what came of it
Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.
Who sets the shots up
Player
Set-ups
xG created
Goals
Gaetano Oristanio
2
0.26
0
Rolando Mandragora
4
0.20
1
Rafik Belghali
1
0.04
0
Kian Fitz-Jim
1
0.03
0
Who takes them
Player
Shots
xG
Goals
Sandro Kulenovic
3
0.21
1
Giovanni Simeone
3
0.19
0
Saúl Coco
2
0.13
0
Daniel Bragança
2
0.08
0
Rolando Mandragora
2
0.07
0
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Torino's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.4 of 0.8 xG, 6 of 14 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 2 of the 14 shots (14%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 6 of the 14 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 0.8 xG (+0.2).
Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide
Bologna
The question
How does Bologna deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?
11 crosses: 3 found a team-mate (27%), 3 led to a shot (27%). 1 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back. Grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball.
Torino
The question
How does Torino deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?
16 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (25%), 1 led to a shot (6%). 4 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (50%), 1 led to a shot (25%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back. Grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball.
Crosses by Territory
Bologna
The question
Which part of the final third does Bologna actually cross from?
11 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline. 27% come from one territory, the advanced left wing; 1 come from the half-spaces and 0 from the centre.
Territory
Crosses
Share
Led to a shot
advanced · left wing
3
27%
1
byline · left wing
3
27%
2
byline · right wing
2
18%
0
deep · left wing
1
9%
0
advanced · right wing
1
9%
0
byline · left half-space
1
9%
0
Torino
The question
Which part of the final third does Torino actually cross from?
16 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline. 25% come from one territory, the byline left wing; 1 come from the half-spaces and 0 from the centre.
Territory
Crosses
Share
Led to a shot
byline · left wing
4
25%
0
deep · left wing
3
19%
1
advanced · left wing
3
19%
0
byline · right wing
3
19%
0
deep · right wing
1
6%
0
advanced · right wing
1
6%
0
byline · right half-space
1
6%
0
On-Ball Value — who moved the game
Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds. A forward pass into space is positive, a lost ball in a dangerous spot is negative. The chart adds the values up as the match goes on.
+0.82Bologna on-ball value
+1.20Torino on-ball value
BolognaTorinoEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Bologna — where the value came from
Passes355 actions+0.07
Carries61 actions-0.04
Dribbles8 actions-0.02
Shots11 actions+0.48
Ball wins64 actions+0.33
Torino — where the value came from
Passes512 actions+0.56
Carries140 actions+0.11
Dribbles9 actions-0.02
Shots14 actions+0.35
Ball wins51 actions+0.20
Bologna — most on-ball value (OBV)
Player
Actions
OBV
Federico Bernardeschi
42
+0.295
Tommaso Pobega
28
+0.220
Roberto Piccoli
25
+0.142
Nikola Moro
11
+0.126
Arthur Theate
39
+0.061
Riccardo Orsolini (lowest)
12
-0.063
Torino — most on-ball value (OBV)
Player
Actions
OBV
Gaetano Oristanio
11
+0.408
Sandro Kulenovic
14
+0.308
Rolando Mandragora
55
+0.174
Saúl Coco
86
+0.163
Emirhan Ilkhan
28
+0.111
Alessio Cacciamani (lowest)
46
-0.193
When they lose it1 section
Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die
Bologna
Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier. Grey cells are real zones with too few attempts to trust a rate.
Loss rate by zone
How they lose it
Incomplete pass — attacking third
20
Failed forward pass
17
Failed take-on
6
Lost in the defensive third
52
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 53% of 15 pass attempts there are lost (8 times). Separately, 20% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Torino
Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier. Grey cells are real zones with too few attempts to trust a rate.
Loss rate by zone
How they lose it
Incomplete pass — attacking third
33
Failed forward pass
18
Failed take-on
5
Lost in the defensive third
33
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 40% of 25 pass attempts there are lost (10 times). Separately, 29% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession
Out of possession
How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.
Not just press intensity, but where the 180 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.
Where defensive actions happen
Attacking third
9%
Middle third
43%
Own third
47%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 5.6 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 9% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 43% in midfield.
Where they win it back
Darker = more defensive actions.
Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.
Torino
Not just press intensity, but where the 154 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.
Where defensive actions happen
Attacking third
17%
Middle third
55%
Own third
28%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 2.9 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 17% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 55% in midfield.
Where they win it back
Darker = more defensive actions.
Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.
How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won
Bologna
The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Bologna win it back with a defensive action?
Counted over the 34 opposition possessions that Bologna ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge. Fewer passes and seconds means the ball is won quickly (a press); more means the opponent is allowed to play before Bologna step in. Bologna win it after 5.6 opponent passes in the first half-hour and after 4.1 after the hour mark (sooner).
PASSES THEY GET
5.6passes
median 4 · before Bologna win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
16sec
median 9s · 34.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
32%
29%
21%
18%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
6.6
17s
15–30′
4.8
14s
30–45+′
6.7
20s
45–60′
too few
60–75′
6.2
21s
75–90+′
3.2
8s
average passesaverage seconds
Torino
The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Torino win it back with a defensive action?
Counted over the 25 opposition possessions that Torino ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge. Fewer passes and seconds means the ball is won quickly (a press); more means the opponent is allowed to play before Torino step in. Torino win it after 2.9 opponent passes in the first half-hour and after 2.8 after the hour mark (about the same).
PASSES THEY GET
2.4passes
median 2 · before Torino win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
7sec
median 1s · 25.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
68%
20%
12%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
too few
15–30′
2.0
4s
30–45+′
too few
45–60′
1.7
3s
60–75′
too few
75–90+′
3.0
12s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections
Defensive Action Map
Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap a dot for the detail.
Bologna — 180 actions, 128 won
Torino — 154 actions, 118 won
Ball-Win Map
Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.
Bologna — 95 wins · 7% in the final third, 26% midfield, 66% own third
Highest wins
Type
Min
x
Tommaso Pobega
ball-recovery
33′
84
Tommaso Pobega
tackle
33′
80
Juan Miranda
ball-recovery
58′
72
Nicolò Cambiaghi
ball-recovery
19′
72
Eivind Helland
interception
21′
70
Torino — 74 wins · 7% in the final third, 49% midfield, 45% own third
Highest wins
Type
Min
x
Giovanni Simeone
ball-recovery
15′
75
Niccolò Fortini
tackle
8′
70
Niccolò Fortini
tackle
28′
69
Daniel Bragança
ball-recovery
58′
67
Kian Fitz-Jim
ball-recovery
9′
67
Defending the box1 section
Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them
Bologna
The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Bologna? 49 opponent progressive passes and 14 shots faced (0.8 xG against) in this match.
Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Bologna)
Right wing
21%
Right half-space
9%
Central
22%
Left half-space
28%
Left wing
20%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left half-space (28% of the danger conceded).
Torino
The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Torino? 37 opponent progressive passes and 11 shots faced (0.7 xG against) in this match.
Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Torino)
Right wing
30%
Right half-space
14%
Central
23%
Left half-space
2%
Left wing
31%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (31% of the danger conceded).
Context
Shape and tactics
How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.
How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next. The numbers use every pass, carry and take-on and follow each possession in order; the one-line verdict compares the passing with the league. Tap ? for what a number means.
Bologna
Build-up (own third)
safer, more direct, right-sided
right 35% · centre 46% · left 19% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.162
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+14.1 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.13%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.34%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.3.5 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).32% of 66
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.76%
Progression (middle third)
right-sided, safer, circulating
right 49% · centre 27% · left 24% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.183
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+2.6 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.15%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.11%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.3.1 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).26% of 66
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.50%
Final third
safer, played in the channels, more direct
right 46% · centre 8% · left 47% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.79
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+2.7 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.17%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.10%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.8 s
Possessions ending in a shot?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).31% of 29
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.55%
Torino
Build-up (own third)
safer, right-sided, played inside
right 29% · centre 52% · left 19% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.217
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+8.8 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.25%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.18%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.6 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).58% of 55
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.51%
Progression (middle third)
safer, slower, shorter passing
right 32% · centre 33% · left 35% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.323
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+3.6 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.21%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.8%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.6 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).31% of 88
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.59%
Final third
safer, played inside
right 41% · centre 24% · left 35% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.121
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+1.1 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.15%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.9%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.7 s
Possessions ending in a shot?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).21% of 39
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.41%
Against their own norm
The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.
Bologna
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Pass accuracy72%vs 85%
Final-third entries25vs 40
Defensive actions180vs 146
Progressive carries28vs 49
Passes355vs 490
Torino
compared with their other 8 matches this season
Field tilt61%vs 37%
PPDA2.9vs 6.4
Expected goals0.77vs 1.06
Progressive passes49vs 35
Threat from passing5.44vs 3.95
Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal
Bologna
A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.
Excellent (high xT gain)
14%
Progressive
0%
Neutral / sideways
52%
Safe / backward
34%
14% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 86% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Torino
A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.
Excellent (high xT gain)
13%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
48%
Safe / backward
38%
13% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 87% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads
Players
Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.
Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Bologna: 1 corner, 1 led to a shot; Torino: 6 corners, 4 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.
Bologna
1Corners
1Led to a shot
7Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.10Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
Click an arrow to pick out one corner.
Torino
6Corners
4Led to a shot
7Free kicks, their half
6Set-piece shots
0.25Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
Click an arrow to pick out one corner.
goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick
Who stood out — the most valuable players
Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.
Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Bologna
Torino
Every player — the full numbers
Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.
Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
