Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-09-20

Frosinone v Como

FROFrosinoneHome
2–0
ComoAway
2.401.94expected goals
1.751.71xG on target (xGOT)

Frosinone won by more than the chances suggest (2.40 – 1.94 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Frosinone
Como
Possession (share of passes)
35.2%64.8%
Duels
6149
Duels won
36.1%44.9%
Aerial duels
2424
Aerial duels won
1212
Successful dribbles
518
Passes
296544
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Frosinone above the line, Como below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.921.842.76Ilario Monterisi — miss, 0.03 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — miss, 0.08 xGMartin Baturina — miss, 0.09 xGTasos Douvikas — save, 0.18 xGMartin Baturina — save, 0.05 xGLucas da Cunha — save, 0.09 xGTasos Douvikas — save, 0.11 xGTrevoh Chalobah — miss, 0.10 xGNico Paz — miss, 0.06 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.09 xGFarès Ghedjemis — miss, 0.04 xGMartin Baturina — miss, 0.06 xGFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.39 xGGiacomo Calò — goal, 0.13 xGGiacomo Calò — miss, 0.02 xGGabriele Bracaglia — save, 0.06 xGRomano Schmid — miss, 0.02 xGAntonio Raimondo — miss, 0.03 xGAntonio Raimondo — miss, 0.11 xGNico Paz — miss, 0.07 xGAnthony Oyono — miss, 0.04 xGAntonio Raimondo — save, 0.49 xGAntonio Raimondo — save, 0.22 xGAssane Diao — save, 0.07 xGLucas da Cunha — miss, 0.05 xGNico Paz — save, 0.09 xGNico Paz — save, 0.03 xGYan Couto — miss, 0.03 xGAssane Diao — save, 0.07 xGAssane Diao — miss, 0.05 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — goal, 0.20 xGNico Paz — save, 0.07 xGMoise Kean — save, 0.17 xGNico Paz — save, 0.08 xGNico Paz — miss, 0.04 xGGabriele Bracaglia — miss, 0.07 xGMoise Kean — save, 0.06 xGNico Paz — miss, 0.07 xGFarès Ghedjemis — miss, 0.05 xGAntonio Raimondo — miss, 0.07 xGRomano Schmid — miss, 0.03 xGJesús Rodríguez — save, 0.07 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.06 xGNico Paz — save, 0.05 xGMáximo Perrone — save, 0.04 xGAntonio Raimondo — miss, 0.13 xGPatrizio Masini — miss, 0.04 xGNico Paz — miss, 0.04 xGJesús Rodríguez — save, 0.07 xG2.401.94Tasos Douvikas — save, 0.19 xGOTMartin Baturina — save, 0.02 xGOTLucas da Cunha — save, 0.17 xGOTTasos Douvikas — save, 0.16 xGOTGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.11 xGOTFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.32 xGOTGiacomo Calò — goal, 0.19 xGOTGabriele Bracaglia — save, 0.06 xGOTAntonio Raimondo — save, 0.70 xGOTAntonio Raimondo — save, 0.07 xGOTAssane Diao — save, 0.08 xGOTNico Paz — save, 0.25 xGOTNico Paz — save, 0.05 xGOTAssane Diao — save, 0.04 xGOTGiorgi Kvernadze — goal, 0.26 xGOTNico Paz — save, 0.11 xGOTMoise Kean — save, 0.05 xGOTNico Paz — save, 0.18 xGOTMoise Kean — save, 0.05 xGOTJesús Rodríguez — save, 0.14 xGOTGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.05 xGOTNico Paz — save, 0.05 xGOTMáximo Perrone — save, 0.11 xGOTJesús Rodríguez — save, 0.05 xGOT1.751.710'15'30'45'60'75'90'
FrosinoneComosolid = xG49 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Frosinone
Como

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Frosinone or Como got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 2 of 2 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Frosinone

The question
When Frosinone has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Frosinone's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 24.8% of the time on the ball25%Progression: 43.6% of the time on the ball44%Chance creation: 30.0% of the time on the ball30%Attacking transition: 1.7% of the time on the ball44%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up24.8%
Progression43.6%
Chance creation30.0%
Attacking transition1.7%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Frosinone spends most of its time on the ball (44% of its time on the ball).

Como

The question
When Como has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Como's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 31.8% of the time on the ball32%Progression: 31.2% of the time on the ball31%Chance creation: 36.7% of the time on the ball37%Attacking transition: 0.4% of the time on the ball37%CHANCE CREATION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up31.8%
Progression31.2%
Chance creation36.7%
Attacking transition0.4%
Vision AI Model Insight
Chance creation is where Como spends most of its time on the ball (37% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Frosinone
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Como
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Frosinone — 457 touches
Como — 734 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Frosinone

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Frosinone actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
296
ACTIONS
6%6%13%2%4%12%9%8%5%9%9%3%1%5%7%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
69
ACTIONS
4%4%12%1%6%13%1%6%3%9%13%7%1%9%10%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (12.6% of all actions). 52% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 48% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 30% defensive, 42% middle, 28% attacking.

Como

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Como actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
544
ACTIONS
6%5%13%5%3%9%8%11%6%5%9%10%4%4%3%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
134
ACTIONS
1%3%15%7%3%10%8%11%7%4%13%7%3%6%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (13.4% of all actions). 65% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 35% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 31% defensive, 39% middle, 30% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Frosinone leaned on their right (37%); Como leaned on their right (47%).

Frosinone
37%Left side26%Middle37%Right sideATTACKING →
L
37%26%37%
R
Como
23%Left side30%Middle47%Right sideATTACKING →
L
23%30%47%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Frosinone — 35 entries, 29% through the right wing
Left wing: 8 entries (23%)823%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 8 entries (23%)823%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 2 entries (6%)26%CENTRERight half-space: 7 entries (20%)720%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 10 entries (29%)1029%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Como — 48 entries, 40% through the right wing
Left wing: 9 entries (19%)919%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 4 entries (8%)48%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 7 entries (15%)715%CENTRERight half-space: 9 entries (19%)919%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 19 entries (40%)1940%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Frosinone

The football question
How does Frosinone progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

91build-up passes attempted
66%completed
37%reach the middle third
5%go long into the final third

Pass types

18CB · 30%
7Long Wide · 12%
3Long Central · 5%
28Wide → FB · 47%
4Central · 7%
CB18 · 30%
right: 10 passes, most from Calvani10left: 8 passes, most from Bracaglia8
Long Wide7 · 12%
left: 4 passes, most from Palmisani4right: 3 passes, most from Palmisani3
Long Central3 · 5%
left: 2 passes, most from Palmisani2
Wide → FB28 · 47%
right: 23 passes, most from Palmisani23left: 5 passes, most from Palmisani5
Central4 · 7%
left: 2 passes, most from Palmisani2right: 2 passes, most from Calò2
◆ Vision AI Insight
Frosinone build predominantly down the right, with Palmisani as the fulcrum (20 build-up passes). Only 42% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → RW def (6×).

Como

The football question
How does Como progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

170build-up passes attempted
84%completed
24%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

55CB · 39%
8Long Wide · 6%
49Wide → FB · 35%
30Central · 21%
CB55 · 39%
right: 38 passes, most from Ramón38left: 17 passes, most from Chalobah17
Long Wide8 · 6%
right: 6 passes, most from Butez6left: 2 passes, most from Cunha2
Wide → FB49 · 35%
right: 31 passes, most from Butez31left: 18 passes, most from Valle18
Central30 · 21%
left: 16 passes, most from Butez16right: 14 passes, most from Milla14
◆ Vision AI Insight
Como build predominantly down the right, with Chalobah as the fulcrum (30 build-up passes). Only 25% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → C def (14×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Frosinone

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 45 progressive passes across 1 match (45.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
33%
Right half-space
18%
Central
18%
Left half-space
2%
Left wing
29%
Progression is right-dominant: 51% right side · 18% central · 31% left.

Who generates it

Giacomo Calò
10 · 22%
Anthony Oyono
7 · 16%
Lorenzo Palmisani
7 · 16%
Gabriele Bracaglia
5 · 11%
Farès Ghedjemis
5 · 11%
Top two — Giacomo Calò & Anthony Oyono — account for 38% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
45.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
29% reach final third
29% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 71% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 29% of progressive passes reached the final third and 29% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 38% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient

Como

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 46 progressive passes across 1 match (46.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
41%
Right half-space
15%
Central
15%
Left half-space
17%
Left wing
11%
Progression is right-dominant: 57% right side · 15% central · 28% left.

Who generates it

Luis Milla
8 · 17%
Nico Paz
6 · 13%
Jacobo Ramón
6 · 13%
Yan Couto
6 · 13%
Assane Diao
5 · 11%
Top two — Luis Milla & Nico Paz — account for 30% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
46.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
17% reach final third
26% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 83% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 17% of progressive passes reached the final third and 26% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 30% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Frosinone

The question
Where do Frosinone's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

22shots
2.4xG
0.11xG per shot
2big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 7 shots (32%)32%7Settled attack: 8 shots (36%)36%8Set piece: 7 shots (32%)32%722SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 32% of shots710.640.09
Cross100.110.11
Long ball100.070.07
Pass into the box / short pass310.320.11
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.150.07
Settled attack 36% of shots811.510.19
Cross100.220.22
Cut-back110.130.13
Pass into the box / short pass400.700.17
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.460.23
Set piece 32% of shots700.250.04
Corner600.230.04
Free kick100.020.02

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Giorgi Kvernadze20.530
Romano Schmid20.322
Anthony Oyono30.320
Giacomo Calò20.270
Lorenzo Palmisani10.070

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Antonio Raimondo61.050
Farès Ghedjemis30.490
Giorgi Kvernadze40.421
Giacomo Calò20.151
Gabriele Bracaglia20.130
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Frosinone's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.5 of 2.4 xG, 8 of 22 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 7 of the 22 shots (32%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 7 of the 22 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 2.4 xG (-0.4).

Como

The question
Where do Como's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

27shots
1.9xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (11%)11%3Settled attack: 21 shots (78%)78%21Set piece: 3 shots (11%)11%327SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 11% of shots300.310.10
Long ball100.170.17
Pass into the box / short pass200.140.07
Settled attack 78% of shots2101.520.07
Cut-back600.540.09
Pass into the box / short pass800.450.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)700.530.08
Set piece 11% of shots300.110.04
Corner200.080.04
Free kick100.030.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Assane Diao50.480
Jacobo Ramón30.320
Yan Couto50.270
Nico Paz20.130
Tasos Douvikas10.060

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Nico Paz100.590
Tasos Douvikas20.290
Moise Kean20.230
Martin Baturina30.200
Assane Diao30.190
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Como's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.5 of 1.9 xG, 21 of 27 shots), mostly cut-back. 3 of the 27 shots (11%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 27 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 1.9 xG (-1.9).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Frosinone

The question
How does Frosinone deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

13 crosses: 6 found a team-mate (46%), 3 led to a shot (23%). 3 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (67%), 1 led to a shot (33%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Como

The question
How does Como deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

13 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (38%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 9 cut-backs: 7 found a team-mate (78%), 4 led to a shot (44%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Frosinone

The question
Which part of the final third does Frosinone actually cross from?

13 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (8%)8%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 2 crosses (15%)15%2advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 3 crosses (23%)23%3byline right wing: 4 crosses (31%)31%4byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 3 crosses (23%)23%3
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing431%0
advanced · left wing323%0
byline · left wing323%1
advanced · right wing215%1
deep · right wing18%1

Como

The question
Which part of the final third does Como actually cross from?

13 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 6 crosses (46%)46%6advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 0 crosses (0%)byline right wing: 3 crosses (23%)23%3byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 4 crosses (31%)31%4
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing646%0
byline · left wing431%0
byline · right wing323%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+2.85Frosinone on-ball value
+1.11Como on-ball value
+0.0+1.4+2.9HALF TIME+2.85+1.110′15′30′45′60′75′90′
FrosinoneComoEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Frosinone — where the value came from
Passes296 actions+0.74
Carries69 actions+0.25
Dribbles17 actions+0.21
Shots22 actions+1.18
Ball wins72 actions+0.48
Como — where the value came from
Passes544 actions+0.02
Carries134 actions+0.14
Dribbles37 actions+0.22
Shots27 actions+0.45
Ball wins60 actions+0.28
Frosinone — most valuable players
PlayerActionsOBV
Antonio Raimondo31+0.625
Giorgi Kvernadze44+0.527
Farès Ghedjemis43+0.331
Giacomo Calò57+0.311
Anthony Oyono55+0.262
Wisdom Amey (lowest)3-0.006
Como — most valuable players
PlayerActionsOBV
Assane Diao69+0.404
Tasos Douvikas10+0.191
Jacobo Ramón77+0.174
Moise Kean7+0.169
Álex Valle53+0.168
Trevoh Chalobah (lowest)86-0.317
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Frosinone

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

7 of 17 pass attempts lost here (41%).41%7/17Calò3 of 19 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%3/19Calvani10 of 38 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%10/38Palmisani5 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 of 35 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%8/35Oyono1 of 28 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%1/28Calò7 of 25 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%7/25Calvani6 of 16 pass attempts lost here (38%).38%6/16Masini7 of 27 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%7/27Bracaglia8 of 26 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%8/26Ghedjemis8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 22 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%6/22Schmidattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
23
Failed forward pass
17
Failed take-on
12
Lost in the defensive third
31
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 41% of 17 pass attempts there are lost (7 times). Separately, 28% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Como

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

8 of 31 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%8/31Ramón4 of 29 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%4/29Ramón10 of 71 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%10/71Butez4 of 25 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%4/25Chalobah14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 of 47 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%3/47Couto9 of 46 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%9/46Ramón5 of 59 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%5/59Cunha3 of 32 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%3/32Baturina1 of 28 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%1/28Valle14 of 47 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%14/47Milla12 of 57 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%12/57Couto3 of 22 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%3/22Paz6 of 20 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%6/20Rodríguez4 of 16 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%4/16Valleattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
39
Failed forward pass
24
Failed take-on
19
Lost in the defensive third
28
Their weakest zone is the left half-space in the attacking third: 30% of 20 pass attempts there are lost (6 times). Separately, 44% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Frosinone

Not just press intensity, but where the 182 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
13%
Middle third
38%
Own third
49%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.4 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 13% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 38% in midfield.

Where they win it back

1311331715912121521775DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

Como

Not just press intensity, but where the 148 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
14%
Middle third
39%
Own third
47%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 2.9 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 14% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 39% in midfield.

Where they win it back

101225139181111612655DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Frosinone

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Frosinone win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 42 opposition possessions that Frosinone ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.2passes
median 3 · before Frosinone win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
17sec
median 10s · 42.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
43%
24%
17%
17%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
5.3
16s
15–30′
6.5
20s
30–45+′
6.6
23s
45–60′
3.0
8s
60–75′
4.8
13s
75–90+′
5.7
23s
average passesaverage seconds

Como

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Como win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 31 opposition possessions that Como ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
2.9passes
median 1 · before Como win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
8sec
median 3s · 31.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
61%
26%
10%
3%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
1.7
3s
15–30′

too few
30–45+′
4.5
12s
45–60′
5.6
19s
60–75′
1.4
1s
75–90+′
2.0
9s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Frosinone — 182 actions, 122 won
Como — 148 actions, 113 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Frosinone — 95 wins · 7% in the final third, 36% midfield, 57% own third
own third, right: 9 of 95 wins (9%)9%9 winsown third, centre: 31 of 95 wins (33%)33%31 winsown third, left: 14 of 95 wins (15%)15%14 winsmidfield, right: 12 of 95 wins (13%)13%12 winsmidfield, centre: 7 of 95 wins (7%)7%7 winsmidfield, left: 15 of 95 wins (16%)16%15 winsfinal third, right: 2 of 95 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 95 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 4 of 95 wins (4%)4%4 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Romano Schmidball-recovery55′97
Patrizio Masiniinterception55′86
Anthony Oyonotackle50′77
Farès Ghedjemisball-recovery0′74
Antonio Raimondoball-recovery12′73
Como — 76 wins · 5% in the final third, 33% midfield, 62% own third
own third, right: 14 of 76 wins (18%)18%14 winsown third, centre: 18 of 76 wins (24%)24%18 winsown third, left: 15 of 76 wins (20%)20%15 winsmidfield, right: 10 of 76 wins (13%)13%10 winsmidfield, centre: 7 of 76 wins (9%)9%7 winsmidfield, left: 8 of 76 wins (11%)11%8 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 76 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 1 of 76 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 2 of 76 wins (3%)3%2 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Jesús Rodrígueztackle64′76
Yan Coutoball-recovery11′70
Martin Baturinaball-recovery10′68
Assane Diaoball-recovery54′68
Yan Coutointerception65′66
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Frosinone

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Frosinone? 46 opponent progressive passes and 27 shots faced (1.9 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Frosinone)

Right wing
39%
Right half-space
20%
Central
14%
Left half-space
16%
Left wing
10%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (39% of the danger conceded).

Como

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Como? 45 opponent progressive passes and 22 shots faced (2.4 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Como)

Right wing
34%
Right half-space
17%
Central
19%
Left half-space
0%
Left wing
30%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (34% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Frosinone

Build-up (own third)

slower, safer, less recycling

right 33% · centre 48% · left 19%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
111
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+18.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
34%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
51% of 61
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
48%
Progression (middle third)

safer, attacking the next line, right-sided

right 43% · centre 25% · left 33%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
159
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
14%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
50% of 64
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
44%
Final third

safer

right 45% · centre 12% · left 43%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
112
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
27%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
35% of 49
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
45%

Como

Build-up (own third)

safer, right-sided

right 30% · centre 51% · left 18%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
211
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+9.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
15%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.1 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
53% of 62
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
52%
Progression (middle third)

safer, right-sided

right 40% · centre 36% · left 24%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
280
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
60% of 75
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
29%
Final third

safer, played inside, narrow, central

right 58% · centre 20% · left 23%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
224
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
30% of 57
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
58%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Frosinone
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Expected goals2.40vs 1.43
Field tilt34%vs 52%
Passes296vs 367
PPDA4.4vs 3.9
Threat from passing6.82vs 7.45
Como
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Pass accuracy84%vs 88%
PPDA2.9vs 5.1
Passes544vs 644
Progressive carries55vs 48
Defensive actions148vs 135

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Frosinone

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
21%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
54%
Safe / backward
24%
22% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 78% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Como

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
13%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
49%
Safe / backward
36%
14% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 86% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Frosinone: 7 corners, 6 led to a shot; Como: 8 corners, 2 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Frosinone

7Corners
6Led to a shot
2Free kicks, their half
7Set-piece shots
0.25Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
43%3 corners29%14%1 corner14%3 from the left flag4 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Como

8Corners
2Led to a shot
9Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.11Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
12%1 corner25%25%2 corners12%25%1 from the left flag7 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Frosinone
Como

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report