Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Como above the line, Roma below.
xG race
Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places. Switch to xGOT (xG on target) to count only the shots that tested the goalkeeper, valued by where they went in the goal mouth, or Both to see the two together.
Show
ComoRomasolid = xG28 shots — click any dot
Shot map
Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.
Como
Roma
In possession
In possession
How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.
When Como has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?
The share of Como's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen. A phase is where the ball is on the pitch (own third, middle third, final third); a transition or a set piece skips the build-up and is counted on its own.
Phase
Share of the time
Build-up
28.9%
Progression
38.2%
Chance creation
31.2%
Attacking transition
1.7%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Como spends most of its time on the ball (38% of its time on the ball).
Roma
The question
When Roma has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?
The share of Roma's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen. A phase is where the ball is on the pitch (own third, middle third, final third); a transition or a set piece skips the build-up and is counted on its own.
Phase
Share of the time
Build-up
34.2%
Progression
40.3%
Chance creation
20.3%
Attacking transition
5.1%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Roma spends most of its time on the ball (40% of its time on the ball).
Passing Network
Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links. Lines are this match's passes between two players, thicker for more.
Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed). Eight families per team — click any map to open it wide, then filter by channel or third, from one to another (or click a cell of the flow grids), by outcome, half, minute and passer. Channels: right wing, right half-space, centre, left half-space, left wing.
From channel
To channel
From third
To third
Outcome · half
Minutes
Channel to channel · click a cell
Third to third · click a cell
Touch Density
Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.
Como — 864 touches
Roma — 525 touches
Which Zones Do They Attack Through?
Como
The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Como actually do its on-ball work?
Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other. Each is binned into the 15 pitch zones (three thirds × five vertical lanes) and shaded by its share of that kind of action; the arrows are the real actions.
Passes
the ball moved by a pass
718
ACTIONS
Carries
the ball moved with a player
166
ACTIONS
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (12.7% of all actions). 68% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 32% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 26% defensive, 45% middle, 29% attacking.
Roma
The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Roma actually do its on-ball work?
Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other. Each is binned into the 15 pitch zones (three thirds × five vertical lanes) and shaded by its share of that kind of action; the arrows are the real actions.
Passes
the ball moved by a pass
384
ACTIONS
Carries
the ball moved with a player
96
ACTIONS
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left wing of the middle third (18.5% of all actions). 47% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 53% down the two wings — a wing-oriented build. By third: 38% defensive, 46% middle, 16% attacking.
Attack sides
Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Como spread it evenly (no channel above 37%); Roma leaned on their left (42%).
Como
L
37%29%34%
R
Roma
L
42%17%41%
R
Final-third entries
Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.
Como — 83 entries, 28% through the right wing
Roma — 25 entries, 32% through the right wing
Build-up1 section
Build-Up — the pass map
Como
The football question
How does Como progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?
Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central. Each gets its own panel below, so nothing competes for attention. Arrow width = volume, labelled with the exact count; hover for the top passer.
187build-up passes attempted
91%completed
25%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third
Pass types
67CB · 39%
6Long Wide · 4%
5Long Central · 3%
68Wide → FB · 40%
25Central · 15%
CB67 · 39%
Long Wide6 · 4%
Long Central5 · 3%
Wide → FB68 · 40%
Central25 · 15%
◆ Vision AI Insight
Como build predominantly down the right, with Butez as the fulcrum (41 build-up passes). Only 25% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (12×).
Roma
The football question
How does Roma progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?
Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central. Each gets its own panel below, so nothing competes for attention. Arrow width = volume, labelled with the exact count; hover for the top passer.
153build-up passes attempted
82%completed
30%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third
Pass types
39CB · 31%
8Long Wide · 6%
1Long Central · 1%
63Wide → FB · 50%
14Central · 11%
CB39 · 31%
Long Wide8 · 6%
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB63 · 50%
Central14 · 11%
◆ Vision AI Insight
Roma build predominantly down the right, with Gollini as the fulcrum (31 build-up passes). Only 32% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (10×).
Progression1 section
How They Progress — the mechanism
Como
Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 46 progressive passes across 1 match (46.0/game).
Origin lane
Right wing
30%
Right half-space
20%
Central
20%
Left half-space
15%
Left wing
15%
Progression is right-dominant: 50% right side · 20% central · 30% left.
Who generates it
Jacobo Ramón
8 · 17%
Lucas da Cunha
5 · 11%
Nico Paz
5 · 11%
Yan Couto
4 · 9%
Máximo Perrone
4 · 9%
Top two — Jacobo Ramón & Lucas da Cunha — account for 28% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
46.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
35% reach final third
26% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 65% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it.35% of progressive passes reached the final third and 26% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 28% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.
Which lanes actually create the threat
Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.
Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralefficient
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingsterile
Roma
Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 30 progressive passes across 1 match (30.0/game).
Origin lane
Right wing
20%
Right half-space
13%
Central
20%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
37%
Progression is left-dominant: 33% right side · 20% central · 47% left.
Who generates it
Wesley
6 · 20%
Gianluca Mancini
4 · 13%
Lorenzo Pellegrini
4 · 13%
Pierluigi Gollini
4 · 13%
Nahuel Molina
3 · 10%
Top two — Wesley & Gianluca Mancini — account for 33% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
30.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
40% reach final third
7% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 60% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it.40% of progressive passes reached the final third and 7% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 33% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.
Which lanes actually create the threat
Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.
Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections
Chance creation — how the shots come
Como
The question
Where do Como's chances actually come from?
Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece. Then by how it was set up: a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box, or no pass at all (the player created it himself). So a cut-back from an attacking transition is counted apart from a cut-back in a settled attack.
19shots
1.7xG
0.09xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set up
Shots
Goals
xG
xG / shot
Attacking transition5% of shots
1
0
0.06
0.06
Pass into the box / short pass
1
0
0.06
0.06
Settled attack74% of shots
14
0
1.53
0.11
Cross
2
0
0.32
0.16
Cut-back
2
0
0.25
0.12
Pass into the box / short pass
6
0
0.72
0.12
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)
4
0
0.24
0.06
Set piece21% of shots
4
0
0.16
0.04
Corner
4
0
0.16
0.04
Every attempt to create — and what came of it
Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.
Who sets the shots up
Player
Set-ups
xG created
Goals
Jacobo Ramón
1
0.48
0
Kaiki
2
0.32
0
Assane Diao
2
0.20
0
Luis Milla
1
0.10
0
Nico Paz
2
0.08
0
Who takes them
Player
Shots
xG
Goals
Nico Paz
4
0.82
0
Tasos Douvikas
3
0.24
0
Máximo Perrone
1
0.15
0
Maxence Caqueret
2
0.12
0
Jacobo Ramón
2
0.11
0
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Como's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.5 of 1.7 xG, 14 of 19 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 1 of the 19 shots (5%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 4 of the 19 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 1.7 xG (-1.7).
Roma
The question
Where do Roma's chances actually come from?
Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece. Then by how it was set up: a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box, or no pass at all (the player created it himself). So a cut-back from an attacking transition is counted apart from a cut-back in a settled attack.
9shots
0.6xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set up
Shots
Goals
xG
xG / shot
Attacking transition33% of shots
3
0
0.12
0.04
Pass into the box / short pass
2
0
0.12
0.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)
1
0
0.00
0.00
Settled attack56% of shots
5
0
0.36
0.07
Long ball
1
0
0.06
0.06
Pass into the box / short pass
2
0
0.12
0.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)
2
0
0.17
0.09
Set piece11% of shots
1
0
0.15
0.15
Corner
1
0
0.15
0.15
Every attempt to create — and what came of it
Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.
Who sets the shots up
Player
Set-ups
xG created
Goals
Paulo Dybala
1
0.08
0
Manu Koné
1
0.07
0
Gianluca Mancini
1
0.06
0
Nahuel Molina
1
0.05
0
Wesley
1
0.04
0
Who takes them
Player
Shots
xG
Goals
Paulo Dybala
3
0.19
0
Mario Hermoso
1
0.15
0
Donyell Malen
2
0.15
0
Lorenzo Pellegrini
2
0.11
0
Manu Koné
1
0.04
0
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Roma's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.4 of 0.6 xG, 5 of 9 shots), mostly own creation (carry, dribble, rebound). 3 of the 9 shots (33%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 1 of the 9 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 0.6 xG (-0.6).
Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide
Como
The question
How does Como deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?
11 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (45%), 1 led to a shot (9%). 6 cut-backs: 3 found a team-mate (50%), 2 led to a shot (33%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back. Grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball.
Roma
The question
How does Roma deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?
5 crosses: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 2 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back. Grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball.
Crosses by Territory
Como
The question
Which part of the final third does Como actually cross from?
11 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline. 36% come from one territory, the advanced right wing; 0 come from the half-spaces and 0 from the centre.
Territory
Crosses
Share
Led to a shot
advanced · right wing
4
36%
0
advanced · left wing
4
36%
1
deep · left wing
2
18%
0
byline · left wing
1
9%
0
Roma
The question
Which part of the final third does Roma actually cross from?
5 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline. 20% come from one territory, the deep right wing; 0 come from the half-spaces and 0 from the centre.
Territory
Crosses
Share
Led to a shot
deep · right wing
1
20%
0
advanced · right wing
1
20%
0
advanced · left wing
1
20%
0
byline · right wing
1
20%
0
byline · left wing
1
20%
0
On-Ball Value — who moved the game
Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds. A forward pass into space is positive, a lost ball in a dangerous spot is negative. The chart adds the values up as the match goes on.
+1.74Como on-ball value
+1.47Roma on-ball value
ComoRomaEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Como — where the value came from
Passes718 actions+0.96
Carries166 actions+0.09
Dribbles26 actions+0.10
Shots19 actions+0.36
Ball wins62 actions+0.23
Roma — where the value came from
Passes384 actions+0.50
Carries96 actions+0.01
Dribbles19 actions+0.03
Shots9 actions+0.49
Ball wins55 actions+0.45
Como — most on-ball value (OBV)
Player
Actions
OBV
Jacobo Ramón
116
+0.486
Luis Milla
16
+0.457
Máximo Perrone
95
+0.309
Trevoh Chalobah
134
+0.283
Assane Diao
57
+0.215
Tasos Douvikas (lowest)
14
-0.328
Roma — most on-ball value (OBV)
Player
Actions
OBV
Paulo Dybala
61
+0.564
Mario Hermoso
62
+0.382
Gianluca Mancini
46
+0.160
Donyell Malen
12
+0.106
Pierluigi Gollini
45
+0.100
Nahuel Molina (lowest)
63
-0.121
When they lose it1 section
Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die
Como
Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier. Grey cells are real zones with too few attempts to trust a rate.
Loss rate by zone
How they lose it
Incomplete pass — attacking third
32
Failed forward pass
22
Failed take-on
15
Lost in the defensive third
16
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the attacking third: 26% of 38 pass attempts there are lost (10 times). Separately, 44% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Roma
Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier. Grey cells are real zones with too few attempts to trust a rate.
Loss rate by zone
How they lose it
Incomplete pass — attacking third
19
Failed forward pass
13
Failed take-on
12
Lost in the defensive third
28
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the attacking third: 33% of 21 pass attempts there are lost (7 times). Separately, 23% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession
Out of possession
How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.
Not just press intensity, but where the 134 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.
Where defensive actions happen
Attacking third
16%
Middle third
42%
Own third
42%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 5.0 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 16% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 42% in midfield.
Where they win it back
Darker = more defensive actions.
Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.
Roma
Not just press intensity, but where the 141 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.
Where defensive actions happen
Attacking third
10%
Middle third
39%
Own third
51%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 7.4 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 10% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 39% in midfield.
Where they win it back
Darker = more defensive actions.
Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.
How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won
Como
The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Como win it back with a defensive action?
Counted over the 27 opposition possessions that Como ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge. Fewer passes and seconds means the ball is won quickly (a press); more means the opponent is allowed to play before Como step in. Como win it after 5.6 opponent passes in the first half-hour and after 1.8 after the hour mark (sooner).
PASSES THEY GET
3.7passes
median 2 · before Como win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
10sec
median 3s · 27.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
63%
19%
11%
7%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
too few
15–30′
6.8
15s
30–45+′
4.2
13s
45–60′
too few
60–75′
3.7
8s
75–90+′
1.2
4s
average passesaverage seconds
Roma
The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Roma win it back with a defensive action?
Counted over the 28 opposition possessions that Roma ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge. Fewer passes and seconds means the ball is won quickly (a press); more means the opponent is allowed to play before Roma step in. Roma win it after 6.7 opponent passes in the first half-hour and after 9.7 after the hour mark (later).
PASSES THEY GET
6.7passes
median 4 · before Roma win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
18sec
median 10s · 28.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
29%
39%
18%
14%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
5.6
16s
15–30′
7.8
21s
30–45+′
3.9
13s
45–60′
too few
60–75′
8.0
20s
75–90+′
11.0
27s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections
Defensive Action Map
Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap a dot for the detail.
Como — 134 actions, 100 won
Roma — 141 actions, 107 won
Ball-Win Map
Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.
Como — 76 wins · 5% in the final third, 37% midfield, 58% own third
Highest wins
Type
Min
x
Maxence Caqueret
tackle
59′
84
Máximo Perrone
tackle
36′
79
Máximo Perrone
tackle
89′
76
Lucas da Cunha
ball-recovery
65′
69
Máximo Perrone
interception
68′
65
Roma — 74 wins · 4% in the final third, 34% midfield, 62% own third
Highest wins
Type
Min
x
Paulo Dybala
ball-recovery
10′
81
Nahuel Molina
tackle
11′
74
Manu Koné
ball-recovery
40′
69
Marten de Roon
tackle
40′
64
Paulo Dybala
ball-recovery
53′
62
Defending the box1 section
Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them
Como
The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Como? 30 opponent progressive passes and 9 shots faced (0.6 xG against) in this match.
Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Como)
Right wing
19%
Right half-space
12%
Central
26%
Left half-space
6%
Left wing
37%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (37% of the danger conceded).
Roma
The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Roma? 46 opponent progressive passes and 19 shots faced (1.7 xG against) in this match.
Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Roma)
Right wing
28%
Right half-space
17%
Central
27%
Left half-space
13%
Left wing
15%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (28% of the danger conceded).
Context
Shape and tactics
How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.
How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next. The numbers use every pass, carry and take-on and follow each possession in order; the one-line verdict compares the passing with the league. Tap ? for what a number means.
Como
Build-up (own third)
safer, shorter passing, kept on the floor
right 26% · centre 51% · left 23% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.235
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+6.7 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.19%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.12%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.8 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).60% of 57
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.40%
Progression (middle third)
safer, played inside, narrow, central
right 27% · centre 37% · left 37% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.408
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+3.9 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.18%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.6%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.3 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).49% of 72
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.44%
Final third
safer, more recycling, kept on the floor
right 40% · centre 16% · left 43% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.267
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.-0.2 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.19%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.4%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.3 s
Possessions ending in a shot?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).30% of 40
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.45%
Roma
Build-up (own third)
safer
right 28% · centre 41% · left 31% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.186
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+10.8 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.17%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.19%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.7 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).63% of 57
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.40%
Progression (middle third)
touchline to touchline, played in the channels, safer
right 35% · centre 15% · left 50% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.231
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+4.9 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.20%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.12%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.3 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).34% of 68
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.57%
Final third
safer, right-sided
right 60% · centre 11% · left 29% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.82
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+1.9 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.29%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.9%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.5 s
Possessions ending in a shot?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).30% of 27
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.56%
Against their own norm
The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.
Como
compared with their other 8 matches this season
Progressive carries62vs 49
Final-third entries83vs 58
Pass accuracy90%vs 88%
Passes718vs 636
Field tilt77%vs 60%
Roma
compared with their other 8 matches this season
Field tilt23%vs 69%
PPDA7.4vs 4.1
Final-third entries25vs 61
Passes384vs 609
Expected goals0.63vs 2.16
Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal
Como
A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.
Excellent (high xT gain)
11%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
48%
Safe / backward
39%
12% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 88% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Roma
A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.
Excellent (high xT gain)
11%
Progressive
0%
Neutral / sideways
57%
Safe / backward
32%
11% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 89% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads
Players
Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.
Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Como: 6 corners, 2 led to a shot; Roma: 2 corners, 1 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.
Como
6Corners
2Led to a shot
3Free kicks, their half
4Set-piece shots
0.16Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
Click an arrow to pick out one corner.
Roma
2Corners
1Led to a shot
2Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.15Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
Click an arrow to pick out one corner.
goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick
Who stood out — the most valuable players
Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.
Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Como
Roma
Every player — the full numbers
Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.
Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
