Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-10-10

Napoli v Frosinone

NapoliHome
3–0
FROFrosinoneAway
3.001.11expected goals
2.480.37xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (3.00 – 1.11 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Napoli
Frosinone
Possession (share of passes)
51.7%48.3%
Duels
5055
Duels won
48.0%45.5%
Aerial duels
3232
Aerial duels won
1814
Successful dribbles
59
Passes
495463
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Napoli above the line, Frosinone below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
1.152.303.45Noa Lang — save, 0.21 xGNoa Lang — miss, 0.07 xGRasmus Højlund — post, 0.24 xGLeonardo Spinazzola — miss, 0.03 xGAntonio Raimondo — miss, 0.05 xGAnthony Oyono — miss, 0.03 xGGiacomo Calò — miss, 0.06 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — miss, 0.06 xGKevin De Bruyne — goal, 0.79 xGRasmus Højlund — miss, 0.08 xGGiovanni Di Lorenzo — save, 0.25 xGNoa Lang — goal, 0.17 xGNoa Lang — save, 0.07 xGAmir Rrahmani — miss, 0.07 xGGiovanni Di Lorenzo — miss, 0.04 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.09 xGAmir Rrahmani — save, 0.02 xGDavid Neres — miss, 0.08 xGGiacomo Calò — miss, 0.05 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — miss, 0.04 xGAntonio Raimondo — miss, 0.08 xGDavid Neres — miss, 0.13 xGFarès Ghedjemis — miss, 0.04 xGAntonio Raimondo — miss, 0.08 xGNoa Lang — save, 0.07 xGAntonio Raimondo — miss, 0.07 xGTomás Bobcek — miss, 0.06 xGAleksa Terzic — miss, 0.02 xGRomano Schmid — save, 0.05 xGTomás Bobcek — miss, 0.18 xGScott McTominay — save, 0.06 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.04 xGTomás Bobcek — miss, 0.12 xGBilly Gilmour — miss, 0.04 xGMatteo Politano — save, 0.06 xGKevin De Bruyne — goal, 0.51 xG3.001.11Noa Lang — save, 0.10 xGOTKevin De Bruyne — goal, 0.97 xGOTGiovanni Di Lorenzo — save, 0.14 xGOTNoa Lang — goal, 0.33 xGOTNoa Lang — save, 0.09 xGOTGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.05 xGOTAmir Rrahmani — save, 0.04 xGOTNoa Lang — save, 0.04 xGOTRomano Schmid — save, 0.30 xGOTScott McTominay — save, 0.11 xGOTGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.02 xGOTMatteo Politano — save, 0.02 xGOTKevin De Bruyne — goal, 0.63 xGOT2.480.370'15'30'45'60'75'90'
NapoliFrosinonesolid = xG36 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Napoli
Frosinone

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Napoli or Frosinone got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 3 of 3 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Napoli

The question
When Napoli has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Napoli's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 25.3% of the time on the ball25%Progression: 44.2% of the time on the ball44%Chance creation: 24.5% of the time on the ball24%Attacking transition: 6.1% of the time on the ball6%44%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up25.3%
Progression44.2%
Chance creation24.5%
Attacking transition6.1%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Napoli spends most of its time on the ball (44% of its time on the ball).

Frosinone

The question
When Frosinone has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Frosinone's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 19.7% of the time on the ball20%Progression: 41.7% of the time on the ball42%Chance creation: 32.2% of the time on the ball32%Attacking transition: 6.4% of the time on the ball6%42%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up19.7%
Progression41.7%
Chance creation32.2%
Attacking transition6.4%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Frosinone spends most of its time on the ball (42% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Napoli
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Frosinone
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Napoli — 632 touches
Frosinone — 606 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Napoli

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Napoli actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
495
ACTIONS
5%4%12%6%5%11%7%9%10%8%6%3%3%4%5%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
106
ACTIONS
5%4%5%4%6%9%10%12%10%12%7%6%7%3%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the right wing of the middle third (11.0% of all actions). 58% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 42% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 31% defensive, 47% middle, 22% attacking.

Frosinone

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Frosinone actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
463
ACTIONS
3%4%9%4%5%12%8%10%7%10%8%6%3%5%6%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
105
ACTIONS
5%8%2%5%10%4%12%3%12%20%3%4%4%9%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the right wing of the middle third (12.0% of all actions). 54% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 46% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 24% defensive, 47% middle, 30% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Napoli
34%Left side31%Middle35%Right sideATTACKING →
L
34%31%35%
R
Frosinone
32%Left side28%Middle40%Right sideATTACKING →
L
32%28%40%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Napoli — 51 entries, 27% through the left half-space
Left wing: 13 entries (25%)1325%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 14 entries (27%)1427%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 5 entries (10%)510%CENTRERight half-space: 10 entries (20%)1020%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 9 entries (18%)918%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Frosinone — 55 entries, 35% through the right wing
Left wing: 12 entries (22%)1222%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 9 entries (16%)916%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 4 entries (7%)47%CENTRERight half-space: 11 entries (20%)1120%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 19 entries (35%)1935%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Napoli

The football question
How does Napoli progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

161build-up passes attempted
73%completed
26%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

46CB · 39%
14Long Wide · 12%
6Long Central · 5%
43Wide → FB · 37%
8Central · 7%
CB46 · 39%
right: 24 passes, most from Rrahmani24left: 22 passes, most from Badiashile22
Long Wide14 · 12%
left: 7 passes, most from Meret7right: 7 passes, most from Meret7
Long Central6 · 5%
left: 3 passes, most from Meret3right: 3 passes, most from Meret3
Wide → FB43 · 37%
right: 23 passes, most from Meret23left: 20 passes, most from Spinazzola20
Central8 · 7%
left: 4 passes, most from Lobotka4right: 4 passes, most from Meret4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Napoli build predominantly down the right, with Meret as the fulcrum (29 build-up passes). Only 27% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RW def (10×).

Frosinone

The football question
How does Frosinone progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

115build-up passes attempted
80%completed
24%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

38CB · 41%
3Long Wide · 3%
2Long Central · 2%
39Wide → FB · 42%
10Central · 11%
CB38 · 41%
right: 20 passes, most from Calvani20left: 18 passes, most from Cittadini18
Long Wide3 · 3%
left: 2 passes, most from Palmisani2
Long Central2 · 2%
left: 2 passes, most from Palmisani2
Wide → FB39 · 42%
left: 21 passes, most from Palmisani21right: 18 passes, most from Oyono18
Central10 · 11%
left: 6 passes, most from Calò6right: 4 passes, most from Masini4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Frosinone build predominantly down the right, with Palmisani as the fulcrum (19 build-up passes). Only 24% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (9×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Napoli

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 64 progressive passes across 1 match (64.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
36%
Right half-space
16%
Central
16%
Left half-space
14%
Left wing
19%
Progression is right-dominant: 52% right side · 16% central · 33% left.

Who generates it

Giovanni Di Lorenzo
12 · 19%
Kevin De Bruyne
9 · 14%
Alex Meret
7 · 11%
Rafa Marín
6 · 9%
Leonardo Spinazzola
5 · 8%
Top two — Giovanni Di Lorenzo & Kevin De Bruyne — account for 33% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
64.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
27% reach final third
20% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 73% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 27% of progressive passes reached the final third and 20% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 33% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralefficient
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingsterile

Frosinone

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 47 progressive passes across 1 match (47.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
36%
Right half-space
11%
Central
6%
Left half-space
13%
Left wing
34%
Progression is central-dominant: 47% right side · 6% central · 47% left.

Who generates it

Giacomo Calò
11 · 23%
Farès Ghedjemis
7 · 15%
Romano Schmid
6 · 13%
Gabriele Bracaglia
5 · 11%
Aleksa Terzic
5 · 11%
Top two — Giacomo Calò & Farès Ghedjemis — account for 38% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
47.0 prog passes/game
mostly central
→
PENETRATION
30% reach final third
30% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 70% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 30% of progressive passes reached the final third and 30% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 38% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the central side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Napoli

The question
Where do Napoli's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

19shots
3.0xG
0.16xG per shot
2big chances (0.3+ xG)
3goals
Attacking transition: 6 shots (32%)32%6Settled attack: 9 shots (47%)47%9Set piece: 4 shots (21%)21%419SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 32% of shots600.650.11
Cross100.240.24
Pass into the box / short pass400.330.08
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.080.08
Settled attack 47% of shots921.420.16
Cross110.510.51
Cut-back200.290.15
Long ball100.070.07
Pass into the box / short pass310.480.16
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.070.03
Set piece 21% of shots410.930.23
Corner300.130.04
Penalty110.790.79

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Rasmus Højlund30.631
Giovane20.571
Giovanni Di Lorenzo10.240
Noa Lang20.210
David Neres10.070

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Kevin De Bruyne21.312
Noa Lang50.591
Rasmus Højlund20.330
Giovanni Di Lorenzo20.290
David Neres20.210
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Napoli's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.4 of 3.0 xG, 9 of 19 shots), mostly cross. 6 of the 19 shots (32%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 4 of the 19 shots came from set pieces; 3 goals from 3.0 xG (+0.0).

Frosinone

The question
Where do Frosinone's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

17shots
1.1xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Attacking transition: 5 shots (29%)29%5Settled attack: 10 shots (59%)59%10Set piece: 2 shots (12%)12%217SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 29% of shots500.270.05
Cut-back100.050.05
Long ball100.090.09
Pass into the box / short pass100.030.03
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.100.05
Settled attack 59% of shots1000.610.06
Cross300.200.07
Cut-back200.200.10
Pass into the box / short pass400.190.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.020.02
Set piece 12% of shots200.240.12
Corner200.240.12

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Aleksa Terzic30.270
Romano Schmid30.200
Farès Ghedjemis30.170
Giorgi Kvernadze10.050
Giacomo Calò10.040

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Tomás Bobcek30.360
Antonio Raimondo40.280
Giorgi Kvernadze40.220
Giacomo Calò20.110
Romano Schmid10.050
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Frosinone's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.6 of 1.1 xG, 10 of 17 shots), mostly cross. 5 of the 17 shots (29%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 17 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 1.1 xG (-1.1).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Napoli

The question
How does Napoli deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

6 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (83%), 3 led to a shot (50%). 5 cut-backs: 5 found a team-mate (100%), 3 led to a shot (60%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Frosinone

The question
How does Frosinone deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

19 crosses: 8 found a team-mate (42%), 3 led to a shot (16%). 4 cut-backs: 4 found a team-mate (100%), 3 led to a shot (75%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Napoli

The question
Which part of the final third does Napoli actually cross from?

6 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (17%)17%1advanced right wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 1 crosses (17%)17%1byline right wing: 2 crosses (33%)33%2byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 1 crosses (17%)17%1byline left wing: 1 crosses (17%)17%1
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing233%2
deep · left wing117%0
advanced · left wing117%0
byline · left half-space117%1
byline · left wing117%0

Frosinone

The question
Which part of the final third does Frosinone actually cross from?

19 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 1 crosses (5%)5%1deep left wing: 4 crosses (21%)21%4advanced right wing: 2 crosses (11%)11%2advanced right half-space: 1 crosses (5%)5%1advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 3 crosses (16%)16%3byline right wing: 6 crosses (32%)32%6byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 2 crosses (11%)11%2
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing632%2
deep · left wing421%0
advanced · left wing316%0
advanced · right wing211%0
byline · left wing211%1
deep · left half-space15%0
advanced · right half-space15%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+3.17Napoli on-ball value
+1.95Frosinone on-ball value
+0.0+1.6+3.2HALF TIME+3.17+1.950′15′30′45′60′75′90′
NapoliFrosinoneEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Napoli — where the value came from
Passes495 actions+0.69
Carries106 actions+0.30
Dribbles17 actions+0.19
Shots19 actions+1.70
Ball wins61 actions+0.29
Frosinone — where the value came from
Passes463 actions+0.78
Carries105 actions+0.38
Dribbles17 actions+0.09
Shots17 actions+0.44
Ball wins89 actions+0.25
Napoli — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Kevin De Bruyne91+0.898
Giovanni Di Lorenzo81+0.605
Rasmus Højlund22+0.426
David Neres44+0.239
Giovane21+0.216
Benoît Badiashile (lowest)64-0.093
Frosinone — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Giacomo Calò97+0.357
Farès Ghedjemis47+0.357
Tomás Bobcek11+0.354
Giorgi Kvernadze64+0.252
Seydou Fini21+0.197
Antonio Raimondo (lowest)17-0.144
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Napoli

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

7 of 25 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%7/25Lorenzo1 of 18 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%1/18Bruyne19 of 60 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%19/60Meret12 of 31 pass attempts lost here (39%).39%12/31Meret5 of 27 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%5/27Spinazzola10 of 56 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%10/56Lorenzo4 of 35 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%4/35Gilmour8 of 47 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%8/47Bruyne4 of 49 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%4/49Højlund6 of 40 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%6/40Bruyne7 of 32 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%7/32Lorenzo5 of 15 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%5/15Bruyne13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.5 of 21 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%5/21Lang5 of 26 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%5/26Spinazzolaattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
25
Failed forward pass
20
Failed take-on
12
Lost in the defensive third
44
Their weakest zone is the left half-space in the defensive third: 39% of 31 pass attempts there are lost (12 times). Separately, 25% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Frosinone

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.0 of 17 pass attempts lost here (0%).0%0/179 of 42 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%9/42Palmisani5 of 19 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%5/19Cittadini4 of 25 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%4/25Schmid8 of 57 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%8/57Schmid5 of 38 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%5/38Oyono7 of 44 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%7/44Bracaglia6 of 34 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%6/34Bracaglia7 of 48 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%7/48Terzic10 of 36 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%10/36Ghedjemis10 of 28 pass attempts lost here (36%).36%10/28Calò13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.10 of 24 pass attempts lost here (42%).42%10/24Kvernadze5 of 26 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%5/26Kvernadzeattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
36
Failed forward pass
23
Failed take-on
8
Lost in the defensive third
23
Their weakest zone is the left half-space in the attacking third: 42% of 24 pass attempts there are lost (10 times). Separately, 39% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Napoli

Not just press intensity, but where the 153 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
8%
Middle third
45%
Own third
46%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.6 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 8% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 45% in midfield.

Where they win it back

172715101514187156DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

Frosinone

Not just press intensity, but where the 183 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
10%
Middle third
41%
Own third
49%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.1 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 10% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 41% in midfield.

Where they win it back

719261720101020132248DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Napoli

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Napoli win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 41 opposition possessions that Napoli ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.3passes
median 4 · before Napoli win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
11sec
median 7s · 41.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
29%
44%
20%
7%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.2
6s
15–30′
5.2
14s
30–45+′
3.0
6s
45–60′
5.4
15s
60–75′
4.0
10s
75–90+′
4.0
12s
average passesaverage seconds

Frosinone

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Frosinone win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 50 opposition possessions that Frosinone ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.9passes
median 3 · before Frosinone win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
14sec
median 8s · 50.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
34%
42%
14%
10%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
5.0
16s
15–30′
3.7
7s
30–45+′
4.0
14s
45–60′
4.3
12s
60–75′
3.9
11s
75–90+′
7.6
21s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Napoli — 153 actions, 119 won
Frosinone — 183 actions, 141 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Napoli — 85 wins · 4% in the final third, 40% midfield, 56% own third
own third, right: 10 of 85 wins (12%)12%10 winsown third, centre: 23 of 85 wins (27%)27%23 winsown third, left: 15 of 85 wins (18%)18%15 winsmidfield, right: 13 of 85 wins (15%)15%13 winsmidfield, centre: 9 of 85 wins (11%)11%9 winsmidfield, left: 12 of 85 wins (14%)14%12 winsfinal third, right: 2 of 85 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, centre: 0 of 85 wins (0%)final third, left: 1 of 85 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Kevin De Bruyneball-recovery1′83
Leonardo Spinazzolaball-recovery76′76
Stanislav Lobotkatackle1′75
Kevin De Bruyneball-recovery2′65
Billy Gilmourball-recovery76′63
Frosinone — 109 wins · 5% in the final third, 33% midfield, 62% own third
own third, right: 15 of 109 wins (14%)14%15 winsown third, centre: 30 of 109 wins (28%)28%30 winsown third, left: 23 of 109 wins (21%)21%23 winsmidfield, right: 10 of 109 wins (9%)9%10 winsmidfield, centre: 11 of 109 wins (10%)10%11 winsmidfield, left: 15 of 109 wins (14%)14%15 winsfinal third, right: 3 of 109 wins (3%)3%3 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 109 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 1 of 109 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Gabriele Bracagliatackle49′89
Antonio Raimondoball-recovery60′73
Giacomo Calòball-recovery17′71
Gabriele Bracagliaball-recovery17′70
Giorgi Kvernadzeinterception56′67
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Napoli

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Napoli? 47 opponent progressive passes and 17 shots faced (1.1 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Napoli)

Right wing
26%
Right half-space
12%
Central
7%
Left half-space
15%
Left wing
40%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (40% of the danger conceded).

Frosinone

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Frosinone? 64 opponent progressive passes and 19 shots faced (3.0 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Frosinone)

Right wing
33%
Right half-space
11%
Central
21%
Left half-space
15%
Left wing
20%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (33% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Napoli

Build-up (own third)

safer, trying to break lines, more direct

right 25% · centre 41% · left 34%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
185
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+14.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
13%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
32%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
39% of 66
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
59%
Progression (middle third)

safer, trying to break lines

right 36% · centre 29% · left 35%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
290
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
49% of 69
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
45%
Final third

safer, circulating

right 44% · centre 19% · left 37%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
143
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
29% of 38
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
61%

Frosinone

Build-up (own third)

safer, quicker, left-sided

right 21% · centre 45% · left 34%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
137
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+11.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
19%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
65% of 55
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
36%
Progression (middle third)

less recycling, safer, shorter passing

right 38% · centre 28% · left 34%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
269
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
51% of 87
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
45%
Final third

safer, played inside, less recycling

right 50% · centre 15% · left 35%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
179
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
24%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.0 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
29% of 52
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
58%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Napoli
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Expected goals3.00vs 1.75
Progressive passes64vs 45
Threat from passing7.96vs 6.08
Pass accuracy80%vs 84%
PPDA4.6vs 5.9
Frosinone
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Progressive carries62vs 35
Pass accuracy80%vs 71%
Passes463vs 343
Final-third entries55vs 36
Expected goals1.11vs 1.62

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Napoli

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
18%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
47%
Safe / backward
34%
19% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 81% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Frosinone

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
14%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
55%
Safe / backward
29%
16% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 84% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Napoli: 6 corners, 1 led to a shot; Frosinone: 4 corners, 2 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Napoli

6Corners
1Led to a shot
1Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.13Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
17%1 corner17%1 corner33%2 corners33%2 corners1 from the left flag5 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Frosinone

4Corners
2Led to a shot
2Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.24Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
25%25%25%25%3 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Napoli
Frosinone

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report