Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-10-18

Fiorentina v Como

FiorentinaHome
1–3
ComoAway
1.921.61expected goals
1.581.43xG on target (xGOT)

Como won the match; Fiorentina won the chances (1.92 – 1.61 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Fiorentina
Como
Possession (share of passes)
47.3%52.7%
Duels
4460
Duels won
47.7%43.3%
Aerial duels
2323
Aerial duels won
1112
Successful dribbles
149
Passes
490546
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Fiorentina above the line, Como below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.741.472.21Alieu Njie — save, 0.08 xGNicolò Fagioli — save, 0.21 xGMateo Pellegrino — save, 0.17 xGPote — miss, 0.02 xGLucas da Cunha — save, 0.04 xGTasos Douvikas — save, 0.09 xGMattia Liberali — miss, 0.26 xGPote — save, 0.18 xGNico Paz — miss, 0.10 xGMaxence Caqueret — miss, 0.10 xGNico Paz — save, 0.08 xGTasos Douvikas — save, 0.09 xGMateo Pellegrino — save, 0.17 xGMattia Liberali — goal, 0.05 xGNico Paz — goal, 0.08 xGÁlex Jiménez — save, 0.04 xGViery — save, 0.04 xGMarin Pongracic — goal, 0.22 xGFranco Mastantuono — miss, 0.10 xGAlieu Njie — miss, 0.14 xGCher Ndour — save, 0.08 xGFranco Mastantuono — save, 0.06 xGTasos Douvikas — goal, 0.15 xGNico Paz — miss, 0.01 xGMaxence Caqueret — save, 0.07 xGMattia Liberali — save, 0.09 xGKaiki — save, 0.24 xGWilfried Gnonto — miss, 0.05 xGAlieu Njie — post, 0.13 xGLuis Milla — save, 0.07 xGNicolò Fagioli — save, 0.07 xGNicolò Fagioli — save, 0.05 xGAlieu Njie — miss, 0.04 xGMattia Liberali — miss, 0.08 xGMarin Pongracic — miss, 0.08 xG1.921.61Alieu Njie — save, 0.03 xGOTNicolò Fagioli — save, 0.09 xGOTMateo Pellegrino — save, 0.34 xGOTLucas da Cunha — save, 0.22 xGOTTasos Douvikas — save, 0.13 xGOTPote — save, 0.09 xGOTNico Paz — save, 0.04 xGOTTasos Douvikas — save, 0.03 xGOTMateo Pellegrino — save, 0.18 xGOTMattia Liberali — goal, 0.28 xGOTNico Paz — goal, 0.27 xGOTÁlex Jiménez — save, 0.02 xGOTViery — save, 0.06 xGOTMarin Pongracic — goal, 0.38 xGOTCher Ndour — save, 0.07 xGOTFranco Mastantuono — save, 0.04 xGOTTasos Douvikas — goal, 0.15 xGOTMaxence Caqueret — save, 0.07 xGOTMattia Liberali — save, 0.13 xGOTKaiki — save, 0.08 xGOTLuis Milla — save, 0.04 xGOTNicolò Fagioli — save, 0.20 xGOTNicolò Fagioli — save, 0.08 xGOT1.581.430'15'30'45'60'75'90'
FiorentinaComosolid = xG35 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Fiorentina
Como

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Fiorentina or Como got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 4 of 4 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Fiorentina

The question
When Fiorentina has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Fiorentina's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 17.9% of the time on the ball18%Progression: 45.9% of the time on the ball46%Chance creation: 33.6% of the time on the ball34%Attacking transition: 2.6% of the time on the ball46%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up17.9%
Progression45.9%
Chance creation33.6%
Attacking transition2.6%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Fiorentina spends most of its time on the ball (46% of its time on the ball).

Como

The question
When Como has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Como's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 44.7% of the time on the ball45%Progression: 42.0% of the time on the ball42%Chance creation: 12.2% of the time on the ball12%Attacking transition: 1.1% of the time on the ball45%BUILD-UP
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up44.7%
Progression42.0%
Chance creation12.2%
Attacking transition1.1%
Vision AI Model Insight
Build-up is where Como spends most of its time on the ball (45% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Fiorentina
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Como
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Fiorentina — 649 touches
Como — 714 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Fiorentina

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Fiorentina actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
490
ACTIONS
3%4%8%6%1%9%11%12%10%5%8%6%5%5%6%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
141
ACTIONS
3%4%9%4%13%7%16%12%4%13%4%2%6%3%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (13.0% of all actions). 66% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 34% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 23% defensive, 49% middle, 29% attacking.

Como

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Como actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
546
ACTIONS
3%8%17%9%7%10%8%10%10%7%4%2%1%1%2%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
68
ACTIONS
1%9%10%7%7%18%9%10%10%9%3%4%1%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (16.4% of all actions). 66% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 34% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 43% defensive, 45% middle, 11% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Fiorentina leaned on their right (39%); Como leaned on their right (43%).

Fiorentina
26%Left side35%Middle39%Right sideATTACKING →
L
26%35%39%
R
Como
28%Left side28%Middle43%Right sideATTACKING →
L
28%28%43%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Fiorentina — 49 entries, 33% through the right wing
Left wing: 10 entries (20%)1020%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 9 entries (18%)918%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 9 entries (18%)918%CENTRERight half-space: 5 entries (10%)510%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 16 entries (33%)1633%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Como — 23 entries, 30% through the left wing
Left wing: 7 entries (30%)730%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 3 entries (13%)313%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 3 entries (13%)313%CENTRERight half-space: 5 entries (22%)522%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 5 entries (22%)522%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Fiorentina

The football question
How does Fiorentina progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

113build-up passes attempted
85%completed
36%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

33CB · 34%
4Long Wide · 4%
1Long Central · 1%
45Wide → FB · 47%
13Central · 14%
CB33 · 34%
left: 21 passes, most from Pongracic21right: 12 passes, most from Pongracic12
Long Wide4 · 4%
left: 2 passes, most from Gea2right: 2 passes, most from Gea2
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB45 · 47%
right: 25 passes, most from Jiménez25left: 20 passes, most from Fagioli20
Central13 · 14%
left: 7 passes, most from Gea7right: 6 passes, most from Gea6
◆ Vision AI Insight
Fiorentina build predominantly down the left, with Pongracic as the fulcrum (22 build-up passes). Only 36% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LHS def → C def (10×).

Como

The football question
How does Como progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

243build-up passes attempted
87%completed
24%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

115CB · 55%
7Long Wide · 3%
1Long Central · 0%
69Wide → FB · 33%
19Central · 9%
CB115 · 55%
left: 58 passes, most from Kempf58right: 57 passes, most from Ramón57
Long Wide7 · 3%
left: 5 passes, most from Butez5right: 2 passes, most from Butez2
Long Central1 · 0%
Wide → FB69 · 33%
left: 45 passes, most from Butez45right: 24 passes, most from Butez24
Central19 · 9%
right: 11 passes, most from Cunha11left: 8 passes, most from Milla8
◆ Vision AI Insight
Como build predominantly down the right, with Kempf as the fulcrum (54 build-up passes). Only 24% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (24×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Fiorentina

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 44 progressive passes across 1 match (44.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
18%
Right half-space
14%
Central
20%
Left half-space
16%
Left wing
32%
Progression is left-dominant: 32% right side · 20% central · 48% left.

Who generates it

Nicolò Fagioli
6 · 14%
Marin Pongracic
6 · 14%
Franco Mastantuono
5 · 11%
Viery
5 · 11%
Álex Jiménez
4 · 9%
Top two — Nicolò Fagioli & Marin Pongracic — account for 27% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
44.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
27% reach final third
20% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 73% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 27% of progressive passes reached the final third and 20% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 27% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingsterile
Right half-spaceefficient
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient

Como

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 26 progressive passes across 1 match (26.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
19%
Right half-space
12%
Central
23%
Left half-space
12%
Left wing
35%
Progression is left-dominant: 31% right side · 23% central · 46% left.

Who generates it

Luis Milla
5 · 19%
Lucas da Cunha
5 · 19%
Jean Butez
4 · 15%
Maxence Caqueret
4 · 15%
Álex Valle
2 · 8%
Top two — Luis Milla & Lucas da Cunha — account for 38% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
26.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
19% reach final third
23% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 81% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 19% of progressive passes reached the final third and 23% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 38% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Fiorentina

The question
Where do Fiorentina's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

19shots
1.9xG
0.10xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 5 shots (26%)26%5Settled attack: 9 shots (47%)47%9Set piece: 5 shots (26%)26%519SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 26% of shots500.460.09
Pass into the box / short pass300.220.07
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.240.12
Settled attack 47% of shots900.920.10
Cut-back100.130.13
Long ball200.220.11
Pass into the box / short pass600.570.10
Set piece 26% of shots510.530.11
Corner510.530.11

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Pote30.320
Nicolò Fagioli20.220
Franco Mastantuono10.170
Marco Brescianini10.130
Mateo Pellegrino10.100

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Alieu Njie40.390
Mateo Pellegrino20.340
Nicolò Fagioli30.320
Marin Pongracic20.291
Pote20.200
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Fiorentina's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.9 of 1.9 xG, 9 of 19 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 5 of the 19 shots (26%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 5 of the 19 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 1.9 xG (-0.9).

Como

The question
Where do Como's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

16shots
1.6xG
0.10xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
3goals
Attacking transition: 9 shots (56%)56%9Settled attack: 4 shots (25%)25%4Set piece: 3 shots (19%)19%316SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 56% of shots920.690.08
Cross200.180.09
Pass into the box / short pass320.300.10
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)400.210.05
Settled attack 25% of shots410.470.12
Cross110.080.08
Cut-back100.240.24
Pass into the box / short pass200.150.08
Set piece 19% of shots300.450.15
Corner300.450.15

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Maxence Caqueret40.481
Nico Paz10.151
Ivan Smolcic10.100
Lucas da Cunha10.080
Álex Valle10.081

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Mattia Liberali40.481
Tasos Douvikas30.341
Nico Paz40.271
Kaiki10.240
Maxence Caqueret20.170
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Como's chances, by xG, is attacking transition (0.7 of 1.6 xG, 9 of 16 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 9 of the 16 shots (56%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 16 shots came from set pieces; 3 goals from 1.6 xG (+1.4).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Fiorentina

The question
How does Fiorentina deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

15 crosses: 1 found a team-mate (7%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 1 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (100%), 1 led to a shot (100%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Como

The question
How does Como deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

5 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (80%), 4 led to a shot (80%). 1 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (100%), 1 led to a shot (100%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Fiorentina

The question
Which part of the final third does Fiorentina actually cross from?

15 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (7%)7%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (7%)7%1advanced right wing: 1 crosses (7%)7%1advanced right half-space: 1 crosses (7%)7%1advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (13%)13%2byline right wing: 4 crosses (27%)27%4byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 5 crosses (33%)33%5
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing533%0
byline · right wing427%0
advanced · left wing213%0
deep · right wing17%0
deep · left wing17%0
advanced · right wing17%0
advanced · right half-space17%0

Como

The question
Which part of the final third does Como actually cross from?

5 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 1 crosses (20%)20%1advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 1 crosses (20%)20%1byline right wing: 2 crosses (40%)40%2byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 1 crosses (20%)20%1
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing240%2
advanced · right wing120%0
advanced · left wing120%1
byline · left wing120%1

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+2.06Fiorentina on-ball value
+1.78Como on-ball value
+0.0+1.0+2.1HALF TIME+2.06+1.780′15′30′45′60′75′90′
FiorentinaComoEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Fiorentina — where the value came from
Passes490 actions+0.40
Carries141 actions+0.60
Dribbles25 actions-0.03
Shots19 actions+1.05
Ball wins65 actions+0.04
Como — where the value came from
Passes546 actions+0.35
Carries68 actions+0.02
Dribbles17 actions+0.03
Shots16 actions+0.89
Ball wins62 actions+0.48
Fiorentina — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Nicolò Fagioli106+0.587
Marin Pongracic88+0.348
Franco Mastantuono54+0.312
Alieu Njie42+0.281
Mateo Pellegrino18+0.278
Pote (lowest)40-0.185
Como — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Maxence Caqueret50+0.301
Nico Paz47+0.283
Mattia Liberali52+0.262
Ivan Smolcic66+0.213
Tasos Douvikas12+0.198
Luis Milla (lowest)87-0.047
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Fiorentina

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

6 of 17 pass attempts lost here (35%).35%6/17Jiménez0 of 20 pass attempts lost here (0%).0%0/206 of 39 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%6/39Gea3 of 30 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%3/30Pongracic7 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 of 44 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%8/44Ndour4 of 55 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%4/55Fagioli6 of 60 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%6/60Njie4 of 49 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%4/49Pongracic4 of 26 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%4/26Viery15 of 41 pass attempts lost here (37%).37%15/41Gnonto6 of 27 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%6/27Dodô6 of 25 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%6/25Pote5 of 23 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%5/23Pote12 of 27 pass attempts lost here (44%).44%12/27Vieryattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
44
Failed forward pass
29
Failed take-on
11
Lost in the defensive third
17
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the attacking third: 44% of 27 pass attempts there are lost (12 times). Separately, 51% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Como

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

2 of 18 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%2/18Smolcic4 of 43 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%4/43Butez12 of 94 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%12/94Butez8 of 48 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%8/48Kempf6 of 40 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%6/40Kempf7 of 52 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%7/52Liberali2 of 41 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%2/41Ramón5 of 57 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%5/57Smolcic6 of 52 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%6/52Douvikas3 of 39 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%3/39Caqueret3 of 23 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%3/23Liberali13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.attacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
14
Failed forward pass
7
Failed take-on
8
Lost in the defensive third
32
Their weakest zone is the left half-space in the defensive third: 17% of 48 pass attempts there are lost (8 times). Separately, 20% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Fiorentina

Not just press intensity, but where the 139 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
21%
Middle third
45%
Own third
34%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 6.0 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 21% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 45% in midfield.

Where they win it back

8813135161315910104113DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

Como

Not just press intensity, but where the 167 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
11%
Middle third
33%
Own third
56%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.4 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 11% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 33% in midfield.

Where they win it back

11163514178101710106DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Fiorentina

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Fiorentina win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 33 opposition possessions that Fiorentina ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
8.6passes
median 5 · before Fiorentina win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
23sec
median 13s · 33.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
42%
9%
12%
36%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
16.3
42s
15–30′
6.4
19s
30–45+′
6.4
18s
45–60′
15.0
44s
60–75′
8.2
19s
75–90+′
6.5
15s
average passesaverage seconds

Como

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Como win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 26 opposition possessions that Como ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
6.4passes
median 4 · before Como win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
20sec
median 12s · 26.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
31%
31%
12%
27%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
5.8
13s
15–30′
4.7
16s
30–45+′
9.0
30s
45–60′

too few
60–75′
11.8
36s
75–90+′
4.6
15s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Fiorentina — 139 actions, 104 won
Como — 167 actions, 121 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Fiorentina — 77 wins · 16% in the final third, 36% midfield, 48% own third
own third, right: 11 of 77 wins (14%)14%11 winsown third, centre: 13 of 77 wins (17%)17%13 winsown third, left: 13 of 77 wins (17%)17%13 winsmidfield, right: 14 of 77 wins (18%)18%14 winsmidfield, centre: 7 of 77 wins (9%)9%7 winsmidfield, left: 7 of 77 wins (9%)9%7 winsfinal third, right: 8 of 77 wins (10%)10%8 winsfinal third, centre: 3 of 77 wins (4%)4%3 winsfinal third, left: 1 of 77 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Alieu Njieinterception79′82
Wilfried Gnontoball-recovery85′73
Cher Ndourball-recovery86′73
Franco Mastantuonointerception27′73
Mateo Pellegrinoball-recovery34′72
Como — 89 wins · 13% in the final third, 21% midfield, 65% own third
own third, right: 18 of 89 wins (20%)20%18 winsown third, centre: 25 of 89 wins (28%)28%25 winsown third, left: 15 of 89 wins (17%)17%15 winsmidfield, right: 4 of 89 wins (4%)4%4 winsmidfield, centre: 7 of 89 wins (8%)8%7 winsmidfield, left: 8 of 89 wins (9%)9%8 winsfinal third, right: 7 of 89 wins (8%)8%7 winsfinal third, centre: 2 of 89 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, left: 3 of 89 wins (3%)3%3 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Maxence Caquerettackle15′90
Nico Pazball-recovery23′89
Maxence Caqueretball-recovery69′76
Álex Valleinterception1′76
Ivan Smolcicball-recovery55′73
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Fiorentina

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Fiorentina? 26 opponent progressive passes and 16 shots faced (1.6 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Fiorentina)

Right wing
28%
Right half-space
10%
Central
22%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
31%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (31% of the danger conceded).

Como

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Como? 44 opponent progressive passes and 19 shots faced (1.9 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Como)

Right wing
17%
Right half-space
16%
Central
23%
Left half-space
17%
Left wing
28%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (28% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Fiorentina

Build-up (own third)

safer, shorter passing, kept on the floor

right 28% · centre 49% · left 23%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
145
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+7.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
59% of 49
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
43%
Progression (middle third)

safer, played inside, narrow, central

right 35% · centre 37% · left 27%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
313
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
24%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
60% of 62
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
29%
Final third

safer, narrow, central, played inside

right 47% · centre 20% · left 32%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
198
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
30% of 53
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
55%

Como

Build-up (own third)

safer, playing short, kept on the floor

right 24% · centre 43% · left 33%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
272
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+7.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
9%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
12%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
49% of 61
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
52%
Progression (middle third)

safer, more recycling, circulating

right 36% · centre 29% · left 34%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
286
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
14%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
5%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
37% of 51
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
51%
Final third

safer, more direct, right-sided

right 59% · centre 12% · left 29%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
73
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
9%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
15%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
30% of 33
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
39%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Fiorentina
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Field tilt69%vs 47%
Passes490vs 419
Pass accuracy82%vs 81%
Progressive carries61vs 47
Expected goals1.92vs 1.31
Como
compared with their other 8 matches this season
Field tilt31%vs 66%
Final-third entries23vs 66
Defensive actions167vs 133
Progressive carries35vs 52
Progressive passes26vs 52

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Fiorentina

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
15%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
47%
Safe / backward
37%
16% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 84% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Como

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
9%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
49%
Safe / backward
41%
10% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 90% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Fiorentina: 10 corners, 2 led to a shot, 1 set-piece goal; Como: 5 corners, 2 led to a shot.

Fiorentina

10Corners
2Led to a shot
3Free kicks, their half
5Set-piece shots
0.53Set-piece xG
1Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
30%3 corners20%2 corners10%10%30%5 from the left flag5 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Como

5Corners
2Led to a shot
2Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.45Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
20%1 corner20%1 corner40%20%3 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Fiorentina
Como

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report