Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-10-16

Frosinone v Sassuolo

FROFrosinoneHome
4–2
SassuoloAway
2.131.50expected goals
3.172.49xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (2.13 – 1.50 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Frosinone
Sassuolo
Possession (share of passes)
42.7%57.3%
Duels
4340
Duels won
48.8%45.0%
Aerial duels
1717
Aerial duels won
98
Successful dribbles
66
Passes
379509
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Frosinone above the line, Sassuolo below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
1.212.433.64Kristian Thorstvedt — save, 0.13 xGDuje Caleta-Car — miss, 0.15 xGArmand Laurienté — miss, 0.04 xGFarès Ghedjemis — miss, 0.05 xGGiacomo Calò — goal, 0.33 xGGabriele Bracaglia — save, 0.05 xGDomenico Berardi — goal, 0.33 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.04 xGDomenico Berardi — save, 0.11 xGDarryl Bakola — save, 0.13 xGAntonio Raimondo — goal, 0.43 xGAntonio Raimondo — goal, 0.06 xGArmand Laurienté — miss, 0.10 xGGiacomo Calò — miss, 0.02 xGKristian Thorstvedt — goal, 0.13 xGAntonio Raimondo — save, 0.09 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.05 xGFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.07 xGRomano Schmid — save, 0.04 xGAntonio Raimondo — miss, 0.04 xGGiacomo Calò — miss, 0.01 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.07 xGFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.06 xGAntonio Raimondo — goal, 0.39 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — miss, 0.08 xGGiacomo Calò — save, 0.05 xGGiacomo Calò — miss, 0.05 xGCas Odenthal — save, 0.07 xGLuca Lipani — miss, 0.09 xGArmand Laurienté — save, 0.04 xGAntonio Raimondo — miss, 0.08 xGMatteo Cichella — save, 0.05 xGLuca Lipani — save, 0.06 xGCas Odenthal — miss, 0.06 xGDuje Caleta-Car — save, 0.07 xG2.131.50Kristian Thorstvedt — save, 0.50 xGOTGiacomo Calò — goal, 0.58 xGOTGabriele Bracaglia — save, 0.02 xGOTDomenico Berardi — goal, 0.59 xGOTGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.20 xGOTDomenico Berardi — save, 0.33 xGOTDarryl Bakola — save, 0.47 xGOTAntonio Raimondo — goal, 0.53 xGOTAntonio Raimondo — goal, 0.04 xGOTKristian Thorstvedt — goal, 0.42 xGOTAntonio Raimondo — save, 0.14 xGOTGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.09 xGOTFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.18 xGOTRomano Schmid — save, 0.08 xGOTGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.04 xGOTFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.05 xGOTAntonio Raimondo — goal, 0.66 xGOTGiacomo Calò — save, 0.43 xGOTCas Odenthal — save, 0.04 xGOTArmand Laurienté — save, 0.06 xGOTMatteo Cichella — save, 0.11 xGOTLuca Lipani — save, 0.02 xGOTDuje Caleta-Car — save, 0.05 xGOT3.172.490'15'30'45'60'75'90'
FrosinoneSassuolosolid = xG35 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Frosinone
Sassuolo

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Frosinone or Sassuolo got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 6 of 6 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Frosinone

The question
When Frosinone has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Frosinone's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 9.5% of the time on the ball10%Progression: 39.8% of the time on the ball40%Chance creation: 49.1% of the time on the ball49%Attacking transition: 1.5% of the time on the ball49%CHANCE CREATION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up9.5%
Progression39.8%
Chance creation49.1%
Attacking transition1.5%
Vision AI Model Insight
Chance creation is where Frosinone spends most of its time on the ball (49% of its time on the ball).

Sassuolo

The question
When Sassuolo has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Sassuolo's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 35.4% of the time on the ball35%Progression: 41.1% of the time on the ball41%Chance creation: 21.5% of the time on the ball21%Attacking transition: 1.9% of the time on the ball41%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up35.4%
Progression41.1%
Chance creation21.5%
Attacking transition1.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Sassuolo spends most of its time on the ball (41% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Frosinone
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Sassuolo
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Frosinone — 556 touches
Sassuolo — 705 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Frosinone

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Frosinone actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
379
ACTIONS
6%4%8%3%2%17%6%8%6%6%10%7%4%6%8%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
84
ACTIONS
2%4%7%1%10%7%7%5%8%15%6%7%6%14%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the right wing of the middle third (15.8% of all actions). 51% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 49% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 21% defensive, 41% middle, 38% attacking.

Sassuolo

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Sassuolo actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
509
ACTIONS
5%4%14%7%6%7%5%11%9%13%5%4%3%3%4%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
94
ACTIONS
2%7%16%4%7%9%11%7%10%12%2%4%1%2%5%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (14.1% of all actions). 60% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 40% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 36% defensive, 45% middle, 18% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Frosinone
30%Left side26%Middle44%Right sideATTACKING →
L
30%26%44%
R
Sassuolo
35%Left side30%Middle35%Right sideATTACKING →
L
35%30%35%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Frosinone — 44 entries, 39% through the right wing
Left wing: 9 entries (20%)920%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 8 entries (18%)818%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 5 entries (11%)511%CENTRERight half-space: 5 entries (11%)511%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 17 entries (39%)1739%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Sassuolo — 36 entries, 31% through the left wing
Left wing: 11 entries (31%)1131%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 3 entries (8%)38%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 6 entries (17%)617%CENTRERight half-space: 9 entries (25%)925%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 7 entries (19%)719%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Frosinone

The football question
How does Frosinone progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

84build-up passes attempted
61%completed
31%reach the middle third
10%go long into the final third

Pass types

12CB · 24%
6Long Wide · 12%
1Long Central · 2%
23Wide → FB · 45%
9Central · 18%
CB12 · 24%
right: 8 passes, most from Cittadini8left: 4 passes, most from Monterisi4
Long Wide6 · 12%
left: 3 passes, most from Palmisani3right: 3 passes, most from Calò3
Long Central1 · 2%
Wide → FB23 · 45%
right: 17 passes, most from Palmisani17left: 6 passes, most from Bracaglia6
Central9 · 18%
right: 5 passes, most from Palmisani5left: 4 passes, most from Palmisani4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Frosinone build predominantly down the right, with Palmisani as the fulcrum (17 build-up passes). Only 41% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RW def → RW mid (6×).

Sassuolo

The football question
How does Sassuolo progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

185build-up passes attempted
82%completed
30%reach the middle third
3%go long into the final third

Pass types

73CB · 48%
9Long Wide · 6%
7Long Central · 5%
51Wide → FB · 34%
11Central · 7%
CB73 · 48%
left: 41 passes, most from Caleta-Car41right: 32 passes, most from Odenthal32
Long Wide9 · 6%
left: 5 passes, most from Muric5right: 4 passes, most from Muric4
Long Central7 · 5%
left: 5 passes, most from Muric5right: 2 passes, most from Muric2
Wide → FB51 · 34%
left: 34 passes, most from Muric34right: 17 passes, most from Muric17
Central11 · 7%
left: 7 passes, most from Bakola7right: 4 passes, most from Muric4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Sassuolo build predominantly down the left, with Muric as the fulcrum (41 build-up passes). Only 33% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (11×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Frosinone

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 50 progressive passes across 1 match (50.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
34%
Right half-space
14%
Central
20%
Left half-space
8%
Left wing
24%
Progression is right-dominant: 48% right side · 20% central · 32% left.

Who generates it

Giacomo Calò
13 · 26%
Gabriele Bracaglia
8 · 16%
Anthony Oyono
7 · 14%
Lorenzo Palmisani
5 · 10%
Romano Schmid
5 · 10%
Top two — Giacomo Calò & Gabriele Bracaglia — account for 42% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
50.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
32% reach final third
18% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 68% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 32% of progressive passes reached the final third and 18% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 42% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacesterile
Centralefficient
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingbalanced

Sassuolo

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 53 progressive passes across 1 match (53.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
28%
Right half-space
17%
Central
23%
Left half-space
11%
Left wing
21%
Progression is right-dominant: 45% right side · 23% central · 32% left.

Who generates it

Sebastiano Esposito
10 · 19%
Arijanet Muric
8 · 15%
Ignace Van der Brempt
6 · 11%
Darryl Bakola
4 · 8%
Domenico Berardi
4 · 8%
Top two — Sebastiano Esposito & Arijanet Muric — account for 34% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
53.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
25% reach final third
17% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 75% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 25% of progressive passes reached the final third and 17% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 34% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spaceefficient
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Frosinone

The question
Where do Frosinone's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

21shots
2.1xG
0.10xG per shot
3big chances (0.3+ xG)
4goals
Attacking transition: 8 shots (38%)38%8Settled attack: 8 shots (38%)38%8Set piece: 5 shots (24%)24%521SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 38% of shots810.680.09
Cut-back100.050.05
Long ball100.040.04
Pass into the box / short pass300.170.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)310.420.14
Settled attack 38% of shots820.850.11
Cut-back100.040.04
Long ball200.130.06
Pass into the box / short pass300.190.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)220.490.24
Set piece 24% of shots510.600.12
Corner410.570.14
Free kick100.020.02

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Giacomo Calò40.220
Romano Schmid20.120
Ilario Monterisi10.090
Patrizio Masini10.050
Giorgi Kvernadze10.050

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Antonio Raimondo61.093
Giacomo Calò50.471
Giorgi Kvernadze40.240
Farès Ghedjemis30.190
Matteo Cichella10.050
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Frosinone's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.8 of 2.1 xG, 8 of 21 shots), mostly own creation (carry, dribble, rebound). 8 of the 21 shots (38%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 5 of the 21 shots came from set pieces; 4 goals from 2.1 xG (+1.9).

Sassuolo

The question
Where do Sassuolo's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

14shots
1.5xG
0.11xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 5 shots (36%)36%5Settled attack: 6 shots (43%)43%6Set piece: 3 shots (21%)21%314SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 36% of shots510.710.14
Long ball110.330.33
Pass into the box / short pass400.380.10
Settled attack 43% of shots610.510.09
Cut-back100.060.06
Long ball100.110.11
Pass into the box / short pass100.040.04
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)310.300.10
Set piece 21% of shots300.280.09
Corner300.280.09

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Darryl Bakola20.361
Sebastiano Esposito10.130
Armand Laurienté10.130
Arijanet Muric10.110
Domenico Berardi10.090

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Domenico Berardi20.441
Kristian Thorstvedt20.261
Duje Caleta-Car20.220
Armand Laurienté30.170
Luca Lipani20.150
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Sassuolo's chances, by xG, is attacking transition (0.7 of 1.5 xG, 5 of 14 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 5 of the 14 shots (36%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 14 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 1.5 xG (+0.5).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Frosinone

The question
How does Frosinone deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

10 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (40%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 8 cut-backs: 4 found a team-mate (50%), 2 led to a shot (25%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Sassuolo

The question
How does Sassuolo deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

9 crosses: 3 found a team-mate (33%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 6 cut-backs: 4 found a team-mate (67%), 2 led to a shot (33%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Frosinone

The question
Which part of the final third does Frosinone actually cross from?

10 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 1 crosses (10%)10%1advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 1 crosses (10%)10%1byline right wing: 5 crosses (50%)50%5byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 3 crosses (30%)30%3
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing550%0
byline · left wing330%0
advanced · right wing110%0
advanced · left wing110%0

Sassuolo

The question
Which part of the final third does Sassuolo actually cross from?

9 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (11%)11%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 1 crosses (11%)11%1advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 1 crosses (11%)11%1advanced left wing: 1 crosses (11%)11%1byline right wing: 4 crosses (44%)44%4byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 1 crosses (11%)11%1
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing444%0
deep · right wing111%0
advanced · right wing111%0
advanced · left half-space111%0
advanced · left wing111%0
byline · left wing111%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+3.23Frosinone on-ball value
+2.71Sassuolo on-ball value
+0.0+1.6+3.2HALF TIME+3.23+2.710′15′30′45′60′75′90′
FrosinoneSassuoloEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Frosinone — where the value came from
Passes379 actions+0.98
Carries84 actions+0.73
Dribbles13 actions-0.02
Shots21 actions+0.94
Ball wins75 actions+0.60
Sassuolo — where the value came from
Passes509 actions+0.48
Carries94 actions+0.51
Dribbles18 actions+0.24
Shots14 actions+0.88
Ball wins63 actions+0.61
Frosinone — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Giacomo Calò95+1.014
Antonio Raimondo25+0.604
Giorgi Kvernadze54+0.434
Farès Ghedjemis58+0.286
Gabriele Bracaglia38+0.239
Patrizio Masini (lowest)50-0.010
Sassuolo — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Duje Caleta-Car78+0.619
Darryl Bakola89+0.499
Cas Odenthal60+0.429
Domenico Berardi44+0.370
Kristian Thorstvedt44+0.252
Luca Lipani (lowest)20-0.059
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Frosinone

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

7 of 22 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%7/22Palmisani7 of 15 pass attempts lost here (47%).47%7/15Palmisani10 of 29 pass attempts lost here (34%).34%10/29Palmisani10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.13 of 65 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%13/65Calò5 of 21 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%5/21Schmid1 of 32 pass attempts lost here (3%).3%1/32Cittadini7 of 21 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%7/21Masini4 of 22 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%4/22Bracaglia8 of 39 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%8/39Calò10 of 28 pass attempts lost here (36%).36%10/28Oyono5 of 15 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%5/15Calò5 of 21 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%5/21Masini9 of 31 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%9/31Kvernadzeattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
37
Failed forward pass
25
Failed take-on
7
Lost in the defensive third
33
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the defensive third: 47% of 15 pass attempts there are lost (7 times). Separately, 37% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Sassuolo

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

12 of 26 pass attempts lost here (46%).46%12/26Brempt3 of 20 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%3/20Odenthal11 of 70 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%11/70Muric4 of 37 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%4/37Matic4 of 32 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%4/32Doig10 of 35 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%10/35Berardi6 of 27 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%6/27Esposito8 of 56 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%8/56Esposito9 of 45 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%9/45Bakola11 of 65 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%11/65Bakola8 of 27 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%8/27Berardi4 of 21 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%4/21Berardi14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 of 21 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%4/21Thorstvedtattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
23
Failed forward pass
17
Failed take-on
12
Lost in the defensive third
34
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 46% of 26 pass attempts there are lost (12 times). Separately, 23% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Frosinone

Not just press intensity, but where the 164 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
19%
Middle third
42%
Own third
39%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.3 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 19% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 42% in midfield.

Where they win it back

1410231072910121087513DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

Sassuolo

Not just press intensity, but where the 144 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
8%
Middle third
33%
Own third
59%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.5 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 8% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 33% in midfield.

Where they win it back

1016191921978419443DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Frosinone

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Frosinone win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 44 opposition possessions that Frosinone ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
3.7passes
median 2 · before Frosinone win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
10sec
median 4s · 44.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
55%
18%
20%
7%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.9
11s
15–30′
4.1
15s
30–45+′
5.0
12s
45–60′
2.0
4s
60–75′
3.4
11s
75–90+′
3.1
7s
average passesaverage seconds

Sassuolo

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Sassuolo win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 34 opposition possessions that Sassuolo ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
3.1passes
median 2 · before Sassuolo win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
6sec
median 3s · 34.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
59%
24%
15%
3%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.5
6s
15–30′
3.6
10s
30–45+′
4.7
12s
45–60′
1.8
2s
60–75′
2.6
6s
75–90+′
1.7
2s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Frosinone — 164 actions, 129 won
Sassuolo — 144 actions, 111 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Frosinone — 95 wins · 14% in the final third, 37% midfield, 49% own third
own third, right: 15 of 95 wins (16%)16%15 winsown third, centre: 20 of 95 wins (21%)21%20 winsown third, left: 12 of 95 wins (13%)13%12 winsmidfield, right: 21 of 95 wins (22%)22%21 winsmidfield, centre: 9 of 95 wins (9%)9%9 winsmidfield, left: 5 of 95 wins (5%)5%5 winsfinal third, right: 3 of 95 wins (3%)3%3 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 95 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 9 of 95 wins (9%)9%9 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Romano Schmidball-recovery87′90
Giacomo Calòball-recovery8′90
Farès Ghedjemistackle69′88
Farès Ghedjemisball-recovery69′88
Gabriele Bracagliatackle85′82
Sassuolo — 82 wins · 4% in the final third, 23% midfield, 73% own third
own third, right: 12 of 82 wins (15%)15%12 winsown third, centre: 21 of 82 wins (26%)26%21 winsown third, left: 27 of 82 wins (33%)33%27 winsmidfield, right: 9 of 82 wins (11%)11%9 winsmidfield, centre: 3 of 82 wins (4%)4%3 winsmidfield, left: 7 of 82 wins (9%)9%7 winsfinal third, right: 0 of 82 wins (0%)final third, centre: 1 of 82 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 2 of 82 wins (2%)2%2 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Luca Lipanitackle77′79
Darryl Bakolatackle76′72
Darryl Bakolaball-recovery76′69
Sebastiano Espositoball-recovery22′66
Darryl Bakolaball-recovery80′64
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Frosinone

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Frosinone? 53 opponent progressive passes and 14 shots faced (1.5 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Frosinone)

Right wing
24%
Right half-space
16%
Central
25%
Left half-space
14%
Left wing
20%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the central (25% of the danger conceded).

Sassuolo

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Sassuolo? 50 opponent progressive passes and 21 shots faced (2.1 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Sassuolo)

Right wing
34%
Right half-space
14%
Central
26%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
16%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (34% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Frosinone

Build-up (own third)

safer, right-sided, attacking the next line

right 42% · centre 43% · left 16%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
96
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+18.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
12%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
33%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
44% of 61
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
61%
Progression (middle third)

less recycling, right-sided, safer

right 47% · centre 27% · left 25%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
194
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+7.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
48% of 77
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
36%
Final third

safer, shorter passing, kept on the floor

right 46% · centre 17% · left 37%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
186
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
4%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
27% of 56
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
70%

Sassuolo

Build-up (own third)

safer, left-sided

right 25% · centre 43% · left 32%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
225
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+11.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
21%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.2 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
50% of 84
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
52%
Progression (middle third)

safer, left-sided, shorter passing

right 28% · centre 28% · left 45%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
278
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
6%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
35% of 78
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
59%
Final third

safer, playing short, shorter passing

right 43% · centre 19% · left 38%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
118
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
13%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
6%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
26% of 38
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
55%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Frosinone
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Expected goals2.13vs 1.47
Defensive actions164vs 178
Field tilt60%vs 48%
Threat from passing8.34vs 7.24
Progressive passes50vs 45
Sassuolo
compared with their other 8 matches this season
Pass accuracy80%vs 86%
Threat from passing8.31vs 4.92
PPDA4.5vs 9.1
Progressive passes53vs 41
Defensive actions144vs 128

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Frosinone

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
18%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
55%
Safe / backward
25%
20% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 80% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Sassuolo

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
16%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
50%
Safe / backward
33%
17% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 83% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Frosinone: 5 corners, 3 led to a shot, 1 set-piece goal; Sassuolo: 4 corners, 3 led to a shot.

Frosinone

5Corners
3Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
5Set-piece shots
0.60Set-piece xG
1Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
20%1 corner40%2 corners20%1 corner20%1 from the left flag4 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Sassuolo

4Corners
3Led to a shot
5Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.28Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
25%1 corner75%3 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Frosinone
Sassuolo

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report