Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-10-19

Parma Calcio 1913 v Torino

Parma Calcio 1913Home
0–3
TorinoAway
2.071.14expected goals
2.430.97xG on target (xGOT)

Torino won the match; Parma Calcio 1913 won the chances (2.07 – 1.14 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Parma Calcio 1913
Torino
Possession (share of passes)
51.3%48.7%
Duels
5448
Duels won
51.9%41.7%
Aerial duels
2929
Aerial duels won
1811
Successful dribbles
75
Passes
507481
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Parma Calcio 1913 above the line, Torino below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.931.862.79Ché Adams — save, 0.03 xGSaúl Coco — miss, 0.05 xGGiovanni Simeone — goal, 0.16 xGEl Bilal Touré — save, 0.18 xGPietro Comuzzo — miss, 0.02 xGMandela Keita — save, 0.02 xGDaniel Bragança — miss, 0.08 xGPietro Comuzzo — miss, 0.29 xGGiovanni Simeone — save, 0.06 xGChé Adams — goal, 0.41 xGDavid Romero — save, 0.26 xGDiego Carlos — save, 0.06 xGEl Bilal Touré — save, 0.04 xGGiovanni Fabbian — miss, 0.14 xGDiego Carlos — save, 0.05 xGDiego Carlos — save, 0.04 xGEnrico Delprato — miss, 0.28 xGEl Bilal Touré — miss, 0.10 xGSimone Lontani — save, 0.05 xGSimone Lontani — miss, 0.08 xGAdrián Bernabé — save, 0.03 xGMariano Troilo — miss, 0.09 xGMariano Troilo — save, 0.04 xGDavid Romero — miss, 0.08 xGGiovanni Simeone — goal, 0.03 xGMariano Troilo — miss, 0.07 xGMatija Frigan — save, 0.12 xGSimone Lontani — save, 0.03 xGDjibril Diallo — miss, 0.07 xGDavid Romero — miss, 0.07 xGDavid Romero — save, 0.06 xGChristian Ordóñez — save, 0.03 xGSimone Lontani — miss, 0.04 xGMandela Keita — save, 0.04 xG2.071.14Ché Adams — save, 0.03 xGOTGiovanni Simeone — goal, 0.23 xGOTEl Bilal Touré — save, 0.45 xGOTMandela Keita — save, 0.03 xGOTGiovanni Simeone — save, 0.06 xGOTChé Adams — goal, 0.40 xGOTDavid Romero — save, 0.71 xGOTDiego Carlos — save, 0.06 xGOTEl Bilal Touré — save, 0.02 xGOTDiego Carlos — save, 0.06 xGOTDiego Carlos — save, 0.05 xGOTSimone Lontani — save, 0.03 xGOTAdrián Bernabé — save, 0.03 xGOTMariano Troilo — save, 0.02 xGOTGiovanni Simeone — goal, 0.24 xGOTMatija Frigan — save, 0.40 xGOTSimone Lontani — save, 0.17 xGOTDavid Romero — save, 0.24 xGOTChristian Ordóñez — save, 0.07 xGOTMandela Keita — save, 0.10 xGOT2.430.970'15'30'45'60'75'90'
Parma Calcio 1913Torinosolid = xG34 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Parma Calcio 1913
Torino

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Parma Calcio 1913 or Torino got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 3 of 3 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Parma Calcio 1913

The question
When Parma Calcio 1913 has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Parma Calcio 1913's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 17.0% of the time on the ball17%Progression: 46.3% of the time on the ball46%Chance creation: 33.9% of the time on the ball34%Attacking transition: 2.8% of the time on the ball46%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up17.0%
Progression46.3%
Chance creation33.9%
Attacking transition2.8%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Parma Calcio 1913 spends most of its time on the ball (46% of its time on the ball).

Torino

The question
When Torino has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Torino's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 36.2% of the time on the ball36%Progression: 40.5% of the time on the ball40%Chance creation: 20.9% of the time on the ball21%Attacking transition: 2.5% of the time on the ball40%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up36.2%
Progression40.5%
Chance creation20.9%
Attacking transition2.5%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Torino spends most of its time on the ball (40% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Parma Calcio 1913
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Torino
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Parma Calcio 1913 — 653 touches
Torino — 636 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Parma Calcio 1913

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Parma Calcio 1913 actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
507
ACTIONS
3%4%10%2%7%12%14%10%6%6%8%3%5%8%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
143
ACTIONS
1%6%10%3%13%15%8%9%4%10%3%3%4%8%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (12.9% of all actions). 67% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 33% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 20% defensive, 50% middle, 30% attacking.

Torino

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Torino actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
481
ACTIONS
5%5%18%6%4%7%7%11%8%9%5%4%2%3%6%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
99
ACTIONS
5%4%15%7%3%6%12%10%10%6%7%3%3%8%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (17.4% of all actions). 64% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 36% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 38% defensive, 43% middle, 19% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Parma Calcio 1913
34%Left side29%Middle37%Right sideATTACKING →
L
34%29%37%
R
Torino
42%Left side28%Middle30%Right sideATTACKING →
L
42%28%30%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Parma Calcio 1913 — 53 entries, 28% through the right wing
Left wing: 12 entries (23%)1223%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 11 entries (21%)1121%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 6 entries (11%)611%CENTRERight half-space: 9 entries (17%)917%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 15 entries (28%)1528%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Torino — 37 entries, 35% through the left wing
Left wing: 13 entries (35%)1335%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 4 entries (11%)411%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 3 entries (8%)38%CENTRERight half-space: 7 entries (19%)719%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 10 entries (27%)1027%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Parma Calcio 1913

The football question
How does Parma Calcio 1913 progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

101build-up passes attempted
84%completed
38%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

51CB · 60%
1Long Wide · 1%
21Wide → FB · 25%
12Central · 14%
CB51 · 60%
right: 31 passes, most from Troilo31left: 20 passes, most from Troilo20
Long Wide1 · 1%
Wide → FB21 · 25%
right: 15 passes, most from Bernabé15left: 6 passes, most from Corvi6
Central12 · 14%
left: 7 passes, most from Corvi7right: 5 passes, most from Britschgi5
◆ Vision AI Insight
Parma Calcio 1913 build predominantly down the right, with Troilo as the fulcrum (27 build-up passes). Only 38% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS mid (10×).

Torino

The football question
How does Torino progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

185build-up passes attempted
76%completed
23%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

71CB · 51%
5Long Wide · 4%
3Long Central · 2%
44Wide → FB · 31%
17Central · 12%
CB71 · 51%
left: 36 passes, most from Comuzzo36right: 35 passes, most from Coco35
Long Wide5 · 4%
left: 3 passes, most from Perri3right: 2 passes, most from Perri2
Long Central3 · 2%
right: 2 passes, most from Perri2
Wide → FB44 · 31%
left: 23 passes, most from Perri23right: 21 passes, most from Perri21
Central17 · 12%
right: 9 passes, most from Bragança9left: 8 passes, most from Bragança8
◆ Vision AI Insight
Torino build predominantly down the right, with Ismajli as the fulcrum (28 build-up passes). Only 24% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LHS def → C def (12×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Parma Calcio 1913

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 48 progressive passes across 1 match (48.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
23%
Right half-space
19%
Central
12%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
35%
Progression is left-dominant: 42% right side · 12% central · 46% left.

Who generates it

Emanuele Valeri
15 · 31%
Adrián Bernabé
13 · 27%
Mariano Troilo
5 · 10%
Mandela Keita
4 · 8%
Sascha Britschgi
3 · 6%
Top two — Emanuele Valeri & Adrián Bernabé — account for 58% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
48.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
27% reach final third
52% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 73% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 27% of progressive passes reached the final third and 52% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 58% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient

Torino

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 41 progressive passes across 1 match (41.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
22%
Right half-space
10%
Central
20%
Left half-space
12%
Left wing
37%
Progression is left-dominant: 32% right side · 20% central · 49% left.

Who generates it

Pietro Comuzzo
14 · 34%
Lucas Perri
8 · 20%
Rafik Belghali
7 · 17%
Nikola Vlasic
3 · 7%
Daniel Bragança
2 · 5%
Top two — Pietro Comuzzo & Lucas Perri — account for 54% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
41.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
20% reach final third
24% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 80% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 20% of progressive passes reached the final third and 24% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 54% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Parma Calcio 1913

The question
Where do Parma Calcio 1913's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

25shots
2.1xG
0.08xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Attacking transition: 6 shots (24%)24%6Settled attack: 16 shots (64%)64%16Set piece: 3 shots (12%)12%325SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 24% of shots600.660.11
Cut-back100.140.14
Long ball100.040.04
Pass into the box / short pass400.480.12
Settled attack 64% of shots1601.280.08
Cross600.520.09
Cut-back100.070.07
Long ball100.070.07
Pass into the box / short pass500.510.10
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)300.110.04
Set piece 12% of shots300.120.04
Corner300.120.04

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Emanuele Valeri80.690
Adrián Bernabé40.530
Giovanni Fabbian10.260
Mariano Troilo20.150
Enrico Delprato10.070

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
David Romero40.480
El Bilal Touré30.320
Enrico Delprato10.280
Simone Lontani40.200
Mariano Troilo30.190
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Parma Calcio 1913's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.3 of 2.1 xG, 16 of 25 shots), mostly cross. 6 of the 25 shots (24%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 25 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 2.1 xG (-2.1).

Torino

The question
Where do Torino's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

9shots
1.1xG
0.13xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
3goals
Settled attack: 8 shots (89%)89%8Set piece: 1 shots (11%)11%19SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Settled attack 89% of shots831.090.14
Cross210.240.12
Cut-back210.470.24
Pass into the box / short pass410.380.10
Set piece 11% of shots100.050.05
Corner100.050.05

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Nikola Vlasic20.471
Rolando Mandragora10.290
Rafik Belghali20.192
Pietro Comuzzo10.080
Giovanni Simeone10.030

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Ché Adams20.441
Pietro Comuzzo20.320
Giovanni Simeone30.262
Daniel Bragança10.080
Saúl Coco10.050
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Torino's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.1 of 1.1 xG, 8 of 9 shots), mostly cut-back. 0 of the 9 shots (0%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 1 of the 9 shots came from set pieces; 3 goals from 1.1 xG (+1.9).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Parma Calcio 1913

The question
How does Parma Calcio 1913 deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

24 crosses: 17 found a team-mate (71%), 5 led to a shot (21%). 7 cut-backs: 3 found a team-mate (43%), 2 led to a shot (29%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Torino

The question
How does Torino deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

13 crosses: 7 found a team-mate (54%), 2 led to a shot (15%). 3 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (33%), 1 led to a shot (33%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Parma Calcio 1913

The question
Which part of the final third does Parma Calcio 1913 actually cross from?

24 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (4%)4%1advanced right wing: 5 crosses (21%)21%5advanced right half-space: 1 crosses (4%)4%1advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 6 crosses (25%)25%6byline right wing: 4 crosses (17%)17%4byline right half-space: 3 crosses (12%)12%3byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 1 crosses (4%)4%1byline left wing: 3 crosses (12%)12%3
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · left wing625%1
advanced · right wing521%1
byline · right wing417%0
byline · right half-space312%0
byline · left wing312%2
deep · left wing14%0
advanced · right half-space14%0
byline · left half-space14%1

Torino

The question
Which part of the final third does Torino actually cross from?

13 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 2 crosses (15%)15%2advanced right wing: 2 crosses (15%)15%2advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 4 crosses (31%)31%4byline right wing: 0 crosses (0%)byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 2 crosses (15%)15%2byline left wing: 3 crosses (23%)23%3
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · left wing431%0
byline · left wing323%0
deep · left wing215%0
advanced · right wing215%1
byline · left half-space215%1

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+2.12Parma Calcio 1913 on-ball value
+1.33Torino on-ball value
+0.0+1.1+2.1HALF TIME+2.12+1.330′15′30′45′60′75′90′
Parma Calcio 1913TorinoEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Parma Calcio 1913 — where the value came from
Passes507 actions+0.52
Carries143 actions+0.13
Dribbles13 actions+0.07
Shots25 actions+1.08
Ball wins61 actions+0.32
Torino — where the value came from
Passes481 actions+0.31
Carries99 actions+0.04
Dribbles12 actions+0.02
Shots9 actions+0.63
Ball wins62 actions+0.34
Parma Calcio 1913 — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Emanuele Valeri76+0.739
Enrico Delprato85+0.280
Adrián Bernabé105+0.263
David Romero21+0.261
Mariano Troilo112+0.180
Diego Carlos (lowest)50-0.198
Torino — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Ché Adams24+0.388
Pietro Comuzzo77+0.286
Giovanni Simeone28+0.237
Rafik Belghali52+0.204
Saúl Coco62+0.140
Daniel Bragança (lowest)66-0.043
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Parma Calcio 1913

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 of 22 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%3/22Corvi7 of 52 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%7/52Corvi10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 36 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%6/36Troilo8 of 62 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%8/62Carlos13 of 72 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%13/72Bernabé2 of 49 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%2/49Keita6 of 32 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%6/32Valeri6 of 30 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%6/30Valeri12 of 42 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%12/42Britschgi14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 of 26 pass attempts lost here (46%).46%12/26Valeri11 of 43 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%11/43Valeriattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
46
Failed forward pass
32
Failed take-on
6
Lost in the defensive third
16
Their weakest zone is the left half-space in the attacking third: 46% of 26 pass attempts there are lost (12 times). Separately, 47% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Torino

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

6 of 23 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%6/23Coco3 of 25 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%3/25Perri26 of 86 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%26/86Perri5 of 31 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%5/31Comuzzo5 of 20 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%5/20Comuzzo11 of 35 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%11/35Belghali4 of 35 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%4/35Adams5 of 53 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%5/53Mandragora4 of 37 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%4/37Gineitis5 of 44 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%5/44Comuzzo0 of 25 pass attempts lost here (0%).0%0/250 of 17 pass attempts lost here (0%).0%0/179 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.5 of 28 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%5/28Vlasicattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
12
Failed forward pass
5
Failed take-on
7
Lost in the defensive third
45
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the middle third: 31% of 35 pass attempts there are lost (11 times). Separately, 14% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Parma Calcio 1913

Not just press intensity, but where the 147 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
18%
Middle third
48%
Own third
35%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.7 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 18% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 48% in midfield.

Where they win it back

1414149111819111141137DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

Torino

Not just press intensity, but where the 158 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
13%
Middle third
32%
Own third
54%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 5.5 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 13% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 32% in midfield.

Where they win it back

141537101091414987DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Parma Calcio 1913

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Parma Calcio 1913 win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 28 opposition possessions that Parma Calcio 1913 ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.3passes
median 2 · before Parma Calcio 1913 win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
14sec
median 5s · 28.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
50%
21%
7%
21%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′

too few
15–30′
8.8
23s
30–45+′
4.4
10s
45–60′
4.3
10s
60–75′
6.2
18s
75–90+′
3.0
8s
average passesaverage seconds

Torino

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Torino win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 24 opposition possessions that Torino ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
6.5passes
median 4 · before Torino win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
21sec
median 14s · 24.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
38%
21%
21%
21%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
13.7
50s
15–30′
6.2
20s
30–45+′
4.8
16s
45–60′
3.3
9s
60–75′
3.3
5s
75–90+′
11.7
46s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Parma Calcio 1913 — 147 actions, 114 won
Torino — 158 actions, 114 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Parma Calcio 1913 — 70 wins · 9% in the final third, 44% midfield, 47% own third
own third, right: 15 of 70 wins (21%)21%15 winsown third, centre: 12 of 70 wins (17%)17%12 winsown third, left: 6 of 70 wins (9%)9%6 winsmidfield, right: 12 of 70 wins (17%)17%12 winsmidfield, centre: 10 of 70 wins (14%)14%10 winsmidfield, left: 9 of 70 wins (13%)13%9 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 70 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 1 of 70 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 4 of 70 wins (6%)6%4 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
El Bilal Tourétackle31′90
Emanuele Valeriball-recovery51′89
David Romeroball-recovery89′83
David Romeroball-recovery53′82
Giovanni Fabbianball-recovery32′78
Torino — 91 wins · 10% in the final third, 20% midfield, 70% own third
own third, right: 20 of 91 wins (22%)22%20 winsown third, centre: 35 of 91 wins (38%)38%35 winsown third, left: 9 of 91 wins (10%)10%9 winsmidfield, right: 8 of 91 wins (9%)9%8 winsmidfield, centre: 3 of 91 wins (3%)3%3 winsmidfield, left: 7 of 91 wins (8%)8%7 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 91 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 3 of 91 wins (3%)3%3 winsfinal third, left: 5 of 91 wins (5%)5%5 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Alessio Cacciamaniball-recovery22′88
Ché Adamsball-recovery39′72
Rafik Belghaliball-recovery17′71
Rolando Mandragorainterception17′70
Nikola Vlasicball-recovery66′69
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Parma Calcio 1913

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Parma Calcio 1913? 41 opponent progressive passes and 9 shots faced (1.1 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Parma Calcio 1913)

Right wing
22%
Right half-space
11%
Central
17%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
40%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (40% of the danger conceded).

Torino

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Torino? 48 opponent progressive passes and 25 shots faced (2.1 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Torino)

Right wing
23%
Right half-space
18%
Central
14%
Left half-space
7%
Left wing
39%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (39% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Parma Calcio 1913

Build-up (own third)

safer, narrow, central, played inside

right 24% · centre 64% · left 12%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
132
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+8.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
13%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.1 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
70% of 44
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
34%
Progression (middle third)

safer, slower, narrow, central

right 38% · centre 38% · left 24%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
326
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+5.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
22%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
48% of 79
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
47%
Final third

safer, attacking the next line, trying to break lines

right 44% · centre 15% · left 41%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
205
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
38% of 52
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
46%

Torino

Build-up (own third)

safer, narrow, central, more recycling

right 24% · centre 52% · left 24%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
221
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+10.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
22%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
43% of 72
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
68%
Progression (middle third)

safer, circulating, playing short

right 32% · centre 31% · left 37%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
255
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
41% of 59
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
49%
Final third

safer, more recycling, circulating

right 41% · centre 13% · left 47%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
116
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
-1.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
5%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
23% of 31
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
42%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Parma Calcio 1913
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Expected goals2.07vs 0.64
Final-third entries53vs 26
Threat from passing10.28vs 4.89
Field tilt62%vs 30%
Progressive passes48vs 32
Torino
compared with their other 8 matches this season
Defensive actions158vs 145
Progressive carries42vs 37
Expected goals1.14vs 1.01
Threat from passing3.60vs 4.18
Progressive passes41vs 36

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Parma Calcio 1913

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
17%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
49%
Safe / backward
33%
18% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 82% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Torino

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
12%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
48%
Safe / backward
39%
13% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 87% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Parma Calcio 1913: 6 corners, 2 led to a shot; Torino: 2 corners, 1 led to a shot.

Parma Calcio 1913

6Corners
2Led to a shot
6Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.12Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
17%1 corner17%17%50%3 from the left flag3 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Torino

2Corners
1Led to a shot
3Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.05Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
50%50%1 corner2 from the left flag0 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Parma Calcio 1913
Torino

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report