Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-10-18

Udinese v Lecce

UdineseHome
0–3
LecceAway
0.602.93expected goals
0.442.74xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (0.60 – 2.93 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Udinese
Lecce
Possession (share of passes)
66.2%33.8%
Duels
3746
Duels won
56.8%43.5%
Aerial duels
2222
Aerial duels won
1111
Successful dribbles
31
Passes
574293
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Udinese above the line, Lecce below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
1.122.253.37Giorgi Chakvetadze — save, 0.02 xGKialonda Gaspar — goal, 0.14 xGOumar Solet — save, 0.03 xGTiago Gabriel — save, 0.08 xGKonan N’Dri — goal, 0.63 xGAmar Fatah — post, 0.13 xGKeinan Davis — miss, 0.07 xGKonan N’Dri — save, 0.07 xGKonan N’Dri — save, 0.06 xGWillem Geubbels — save, 0.39 xGMohamed Kaba — save, 0.05 xGAmar Fatah — save, 0.11 xGWillem Geubbels — miss, 0.46 xGKonan N’Dri — save, 0.06 xGKeinan Davis — miss, 0.05 xGWillem Geubbels — save, 0.11 xGJurgen Ekkelenkamp — miss, 0.03 xGKonan N’Dri — miss, 0.06 xGJuan Arizala — save, 0.04 xGWillem Geubbels — save, 0.27 xGJuan Arizala — miss, 0.05 xGJakub Piotrowski — save, 0.03 xGJakub Piotrowski — save, 0.04 xGJakub Piotrowski — save, 0.05 xGMatteo Palma — miss, 0.02 xGPaco Esteban — save, 0.08 xGMatteo Palma — miss, 0.06 xGPaco Esteban — post, 0.13 xGJamil Siebert — goal, 0.13 xGOumar Solet — save, 0.03 xGUnai Gómez — miss, 0.09 xG0.602.93Giorgi Chakvetadze — save, 0.05 xGOTKialonda Gaspar — goal, 0.21 xGOTOumar Solet — save, 0.10 xGOTTiago Gabriel — save, 0.05 xGOTKonan N’Dri — goal, 0.91 xGOTKonan N’Dri — save, 0.12 xGOTKonan N’Dri — save, 0.07 xGOTWillem Geubbels — save, 0.17 xGOTMohamed Kaba — save, 0.11 xGOTAmar Fatah — save, 0.03 xGOTKonan N’Dri — save, 0.15 xGOTWillem Geubbels — save, 0.12 xGOTJuan Arizala — save, 0.04 xGOTWillem Geubbels — save, 0.28 xGOTJakub Piotrowski — save, 0.02 xGOTJakub Piotrowski — save, 0.06 xGOTJakub Piotrowski — save, 0.08 xGOTPaco Esteban — save, 0.37 xGOTJamil Siebert — goal, 0.17 xGOTOumar Solet — save, 0.08 xGOT0.442.740'15'30'45'60'75'90'
UdineseLeccesolid = xG31 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Udinese
Lecce

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Udinese or Lecce got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 3 of 3 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Udinese

The question
When Udinese has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Udinese's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 25.6% of the time on the ball26%Progression: 44.5% of the time on the ball45%Chance creation: 25.3% of the time on the ball25%Attacking transition: 4.5% of the time on the ball5%45%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up25.6%
Progression44.5%
Chance creation25.3%
Attacking transition4.5%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Udinese spends most of its time on the ball (45% of its time on the ball).

Lecce

The question
When Lecce has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Lecce's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 13.3% of the time on the ball13%Progression: 54.5% of the time on the ball54%Chance creation: 30.3% of the time on the ball30%Attacking transition: 1.9% of the time on the ball54%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up13.3%
Progression54.5%
Chance creation30.3%
Attacking transition1.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Lecce spends most of its time on the ball (54% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Udinese
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Lecce
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Udinese — 726 touches
Lecce — 476 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Udinese

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Udinese actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
574
ACTIONS
5%5%10%3%2%9%10%14%11%9%7%3%1%5%5%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
172
ACTIONS
4%2%14%6%2%7%7%16%13%10%9%1%2%2%4%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (14.9% of all actions). 64% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 36% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 26% defensive, 53% middle, 21% attacking.

Lecce

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Lecce actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
293
ACTIONS
3%5%11%3%4%11%8%9%10%10%11%4%2%2%6%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
67
ACTIONS
3%3%3%3%16%9%10%6%16%10%3%3%6%7%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the right wing of the middle third (11.7% of all actions). 53% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 47% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 24% defensive, 49% middle, 26% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Udinese leaned on their right (38%); Lecce leaned on their right (42%).

Udinese
37%Left side25%Middle38%Right sideATTACKING →
L
37%25%38%
R
Lecce
33%Left side25%Middle42%Right sideATTACKING →
L
33%25%42%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Udinese — 49 entries, 31% through the right wing
Left wing: 13 entries (27%)1327%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 10 entries (20%)1020%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 5 entries (10%)510%CENTRERight half-space: 6 entries (12%)612%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 15 entries (31%)1531%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Lecce — 31 entries, 42% through the right wing
Left wing: 6 entries (19%)619%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 6 entries (19%)619%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 2 entries (6%)26%CENTRERight half-space: 4 entries (13%)413%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 13 entries (42%)1342%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Udinese

The football question
How does Udinese progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

143build-up passes attempted
85%completed
20%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

66CB · 54%
2Long Wide · 2%
3Long Central · 2%
34Wide → FB · 28%
17Central · 14%
CB66 · 54%
right: 34 passes, most from Solet34left: 32 passes, most from Solet32
Long Wide2 · 2%
right: 2 passes, most from Okoye2
Long Central3 · 2%
left: 2 passes, most from Kamara2
Wide → FB34 · 28%
right: 20 passes, most from Vojvoda20left: 14 passes, most from Okoye14
Central17 · 14%
right: 10 passes, most from Okoye10left: 7 passes, most from Okoye7
◆ Vision AI Insight
Udinese build predominantly down the right, with Solet as the fulcrum (27 build-up passes). Only 20% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → C def (14×).

Lecce

The football question
How does Lecce progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

80build-up passes attempted
52%completed
50%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

9CB · 21%
10Long Wide · 24%
1Long Central · 2%
17Wide → FB · 40%
5Central · 12%
CB9 · 21%
left: 6 passes, most from Gabriel6right: 3 passes, most from Gaspar3
Long Wide10 · 24%
left: 7 passes, most from Falcone7right: 3 passes, most from Falcone3
Long Central1 · 2%
Wide → FB17 · 40%
right: 10 passes, most from Ngom10left: 7 passes, most from Gallo7
Central5 · 12%
right: 3 passes, most from Gallo3left: 2 passes, most from N’Dri2
◆ Vision AI Insight
Lecce build predominantly down the right, with Falcone as the fulcrum (13 build-up passes). Only 50% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a side that builds forward quickly, progressing the ball more directly. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → RW mid (4×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Udinese

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 38 progressive passes across 1 match (38.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
24%
Right half-space
11%
Central
26%
Left half-space
11%
Left wing
29%
Progression is left-dominant: 34% right side · 26% central · 39% left.

Who generates it

Mërgim Vojvoda
10 · 26%
Maduka Okoye
4 · 11%
Juan Arizala
4 · 11%
Jurgen Ekkelenkamp
4 · 11%
David Alaba
3 · 8%
Top two — Mërgim Vojvoda & Maduka Okoye — account for 37% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
38.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
21% reach final third
16% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 79% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 21% of progressive passes reached the final third and 16% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 37% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient

Lecce

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 39 progressive passes across 1 match (39.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
49%
Right half-space
10%
Central
28%
Left half-space
3%
Left wing
10%
Progression is right-dominant: 59% right side · 28% central · 13% left.

Who generates it

Danilo Veiga
11 · 28%
Wladimiro Falcone
8 · 21%
Konan N’Dri
5 · 13%
Kialonda Gaspar
3 · 8%
Antonino Gallo
3 · 8%
Top two — Danilo Veiga & Wladimiro Falcone — account for 49% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
39.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
18% reach final third
23% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 82% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 18% of progressive passes reached the final third and 23% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 49% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingsterile
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Udinese

The question
Where do Udinese's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

14shots
0.6xG
0.04xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Settled attack: 13 shots (93%)93%13Set piece: 1 shots (7%)7%114SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Settled attack 93% of shots1300.550.04
Cross300.200.07
Pass into the box / short pass800.280.04
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.070.03
Set piece 7% of shots100.050.05
Corner100.050.05

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Jurgen Ekkelenkamp40.190
Mërgim Vojvoda30.150
Oumar Solet20.070
Juan Arizala10.050
Jesper Karlström10.030

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Keinan Davis20.120
Jakub Piotrowski30.110
Unai Gómez10.090
Matteo Palma20.090
Juan Arizala20.080
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Udinese's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.6 of 0.6 xG, 13 of 14 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 0 of the 14 shots (0%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 1 of the 14 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 0.6 xG (-0.6).

Lecce

The question
Where do Lecce's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

17shots
2.9xG
0.17xG per shot
3big chances (0.3+ xG)
3goals
Attacking transition: 8 shots (47%)47%8Settled attack: 6 shots (35%)35%6Set piece: 3 shots (18%)18%317SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 47% of shots811.340.17
Pass into the box / short pass400.830.21
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)410.520.13
Settled attack 35% of shots600.750.12
Cross100.050.05
Pass into the box / short pass300.240.08
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.460.23
Set piece 18% of shots320.840.28
Corner320.840.28

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Amar Fatah10.460
Konan N’Dri20.240
Joël Monteiro10.130
Danilo Veiga20.110
Tiago Gabriel10.110

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Willem Geubbels41.230
Konan N’Dri50.871
Amar Fatah20.240
Paco Esteban20.210
Kialonda Gaspar10.141
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Lecce's chances, by xG, is attacking transition (1.3 of 2.9 xG, 8 of 17 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 8 of the 17 shots (47%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 17 shots came from set pieces; 3 goals from 2.9 xG (+0.1).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Udinese

The question
How does Udinese deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

23 crosses: 7 found a team-mate (30%), 3 led to a shot (13%). 3 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Lecce

The question
How does Lecce deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

7 crosses: 3 found a team-mate (43%), 1 led to a shot (14%). 1 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Udinese

The question
Which part of the final third does Udinese actually cross from?

23 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 7 crosses (30%)30%7advanced right half-space: 3 crosses (13%)13%3advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 1 crosses (4%)4%1advanced left wing: 4 crosses (17%)17%4byline right wing: 6 crosses (26%)26%6byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 2 crosses (9%)9%2
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing730%0
byline · right wing626%0
advanced · left wing417%1
advanced · right half-space313%1
byline · left wing29%0
advanced · left half-space14%1

Lecce

The question
Which part of the final third does Lecce actually cross from?

7 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 2 crosses (29%)29%2advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 0 crosses (0%)byline right wing: 3 crosses (43%)43%3byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 2 crosses (29%)29%2
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing343%1
advanced · right wing229%0
byline · left wing229%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+0.93Udinese on-ball value
+3.11Lecce on-ball value
+0.0+1.6+3.2HALF TIME+0.93+3.110′15′30′45′60′75′90′
UdineseLecceEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Udinese — where the value came from
Passes574 actions+0.47
Carries172 actions+0.05
Dribbles15 actions-0.02
Shots14 actions+0.18
Ball wins69 actions+0.25
Lecce — where the value came from
Passes293 actions+0.51
Carries67 actions+0.08
Dribbles7 actions+0.10
Shots17 actions+1.90
Ball wins73 actions+0.52
Udinese — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Mërgim Vojvoda116+0.180
David Alaba50+0.114
Jakub Piotrowski33+0.103
Jurgen Ekkelenkamp54+0.085
Oumar Solet109+0.068
Enzo Ebosse (lowest)64-0.016
Lecce — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Konan N’Dri54+1.107
Willem Geubbels17+0.957
Kialonda Gaspar26+0.383
Paco Esteban10+0.375
Jamil Siebert7+0.291
Danilo Veiga (lowest)52-0.334
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Udinese

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

4 of 26 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%4/26Vojvoda3 of 27 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%3/27Okoye7 of 58 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%7/58Okoye4 of 19 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%4/19Chakvetadz13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.11 of 49 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%11/49Vojvoda10 of 60 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%10/60Vojvoda11 of 83 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%11/83Karlström8 of 64 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%8/64Karlström8 of 49 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%8/49Kamara14 of 42 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%14/42Vojvoda9 of 20 pass attempts lost here (45%).45%9/20Vojvoda8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 of 29 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%8/29Ekkelenkam8 of 27 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%8/27Kamaraattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
39
Failed forward pass
28
Failed take-on
12
Lost in the defensive third
21
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the attacking third: 45% of 20 pass attempts there are lost (9 times). Separately, 36% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Lecce

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 of 16 pass attempts lost here (50%).50%8/16Falcone14 of 33 pass attempts lost here (42%).42%14/33Falcone8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 of 31 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%8/31Ngom3 of 22 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%3/22Gaspar4 of 27 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%4/27Ngom8 of 29 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%8/29Maleh7 of 30 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%7/30Gallo8 of 32 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%8/32Veiga12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.7 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 of 17 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%4/17Galloattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
24
Failed forward pass
14
Failed take-on
6
Lost in the defensive third
38
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the defensive third: 50% of 16 pass attempts there are lost (8 times). Separately, 26% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Udinese

Not just press intensity, but where the 144 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
10%
Middle third
47%
Own third
43%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.0 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 10% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 47% in midfield.

Where they win it back

12921137141414121445DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

Lecce

Not just press intensity, but where the 183 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
16%
Middle third
42%
Own third
42%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.1 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 16% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 42% in midfield.

Where they win it back

141620131423121510167686DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Udinese

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Udinese win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 36 opposition possessions that Udinese ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
2.9passes
median 2 · before Udinese win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
7sec
median 4s · 36.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
58%
31%
6%
6%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.8
9s
15–30′
3.3
8s
30–45+′
4.7
10s
45–60′
3.0
9s
60–75′
2.2
4s
75–90+′
2.0
3s
average passesaverage seconds

Lecce

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Lecce win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 32 opposition possessions that Lecce ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.2passes
median 4 · before Lecce win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
17sec
median 16s · 32.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
25%
31%
34%
9%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.0
6s
15–30′
7.2
25s
30–45+′
5.5
15s
45–60′
4.2
14s
60–75′
6.3
21s
75–90+′
4.7
17s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Udinese — 144 actions, 118 won
Lecce — 183 actions, 146 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Udinese — 85 wins · 2% in the final third, 44% midfield, 54% own third
own third, right: 13 of 85 wins (15%)15%13 winsown third, centre: 23 of 85 wins (27%)27%23 winsown third, left: 10 of 85 wins (12%)12%10 winsmidfield, right: 13 of 85 wins (15%)15%13 winsmidfield, centre: 11 of 85 wins (13%)13%11 winsmidfield, left: 13 of 85 wins (15%)15%13 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 85 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 1 of 85 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 0 of 85 wins (0%)
Highest winsTypeMinx
Oier Zarragainterception24′67
Alessandro Zanolitackle82′67
Jurgen Ekkelenkampball-recovery24′66
Oumar Soletinterception3′65
Jesper Karlströmball-recovery89′63
Lecce — 109 wins · 11% in the final third, 37% midfield, 52% own third
own third, right: 14 of 109 wins (13%)13%14 winsown third, centre: 27 of 109 wins (25%)25%27 winsown third, left: 16 of 109 wins (15%)15%16 winsmidfield, right: 19 of 109 wins (17%)17%19 winsmidfield, centre: 7 of 109 wins (6%)6%7 winsmidfield, left: 14 of 109 wins (13%)13%14 winsfinal third, right: 7 of 109 wins (6%)6%7 winsfinal third, centre: 2 of 109 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, left: 3 of 109 wins (3%)3%3 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Konan N’Driball-recovery58′89
Konan N’Dritackle58′84
Willem Geubbelsball-recovery66′81
Youssef Malehball-recovery65′80
Jamil Siebertball-recovery87′79
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Udinese

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Udinese? 39 opponent progressive passes and 17 shots faced (2.9 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Udinese)

Right wing
52%
Right half-space
7%
Central
27%
Left half-space
4%
Left wing
11%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (52% of the danger conceded).

Lecce

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Lecce? 38 opponent progressive passes and 14 shots faced (0.6 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Lecce)

Right wing
23%
Right half-space
12%
Central
24%
Left half-space
13%
Left wing
27%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (27% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Udinese

Build-up (own third)

safer, right-sided, shorter passing

right 30% · centre 51% · left 19%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
196
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
26%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
69% of 52
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
42%
Progression (middle third)

safer, less recycling, shorter passing

right 30% · centre 35% · left 35%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
400
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
46% of 94
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
48%
Final third

safer, trying to break lines, attacking the next line

right 47% · centre 11% · left 42%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
165
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
12%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
22% of 50
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
52%

Lecce

Build-up (own third)

trying to break lines, attacking the next line, more direct

right 26% · centre 47% · left 27%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
88
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+21.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
9%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
41%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.4 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
34% of 59
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
64%
Progression (middle third)

less recycling, safer, shorter passing

right 38% · centre 24% · left 38%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
180
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
22%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
6%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
50% of 58
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
57%
Final third

safer, quicker, right-sided

right 53% · centre 14% · left 33%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
99
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
29% of 42
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
45%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Udinese
compared with their other 7 matches this season
PPDA3.0vs 6.8
Expected goals0.60vs 1.08
Progressive carries67vs 49
Threat from passing6.20vs 5.00
Passes574vs 491
Lecce
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Expected goals2.93vs 1.04
Pass accuracy69%vs 76%
Passes293vs 400
Defensive actions183vs 167
PPDA4.1vs 5.5

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Udinese

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
11%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
54%
Safe / backward
34%
12% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 88% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Lecce

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
17%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
53%
Safe / backward
28%
19% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 81% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Udinese: 1 corner, 1 led to a shot; Lecce: 4 corners, 2 led to a shot, 2 set-piece goals.

Udinese

1Corners
1Led to a shot
5Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.05Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
100%1 corner0 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Lecce

4Corners
2Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.84Set-piece xG
2Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
25%1 corner25%50%1 from the left flag3 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Udinese
Lecce

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report