Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-10-25

Atalanta v Frosinone

AtalantaHome
4–4
FROFrosinoneAway
3.621.55expected goals
3.741.54xG on target (xGOT)

Drawn on the scoreboard, but Atalanta created the better chances (3.62 – 1.55 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Atalanta
Frosinone
Possession (share of passes)
46.7%53.3%
Duels
6259
Duels won
53.2%42.4%
Aerial duels
3636
Aerial duels won
2313
Successful dribbles
54
Passes
365416
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Atalanta above the line, Frosinone below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
1.432.874.30Romano Schmid — goal, 0.13 xGJonathan Rowe — miss, 0.07 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.04 xGFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.03 xGRomano Schmid — save, 0.03 xGEljif Elmas — save, 0.08 xGNikola Krstovic — goal, 0.42 xGÉderson — save, 0.04 xGMarco Carnesecchi — save, 0.04 xGRomano Schmid — goal, 0.10 xGCharles De Ketelaere — save, 0.21 xGCharles De Ketelaere — save, 0.04 xGCharles De Ketelaere — miss, 0.06 xGAntonio Raimondo — save, 0.14 xGAntonio Raimondo — miss, 0.06 xGCharles De Ketelaere — save, 0.05 xGÉderson — goal, 0.79 xGJonathan Rowe — save, 0.07 xGÉderson — save, 0.11 xGNikola Krstovic — miss, 0.06 xGÉderson — miss, 0.36 xGNikola Krstovic — miss, 0.15 xGNikola Krstovic — goal, 0.22 xGRomano Schmid — miss, 0.11 xGPatrizio Masini — miss, 0.06 xGGiacomo Calò — goal, 0.06 xGEljif Elmas — goal, 0.29 xGGiorgi Kvernadze — miss, 0.09 xGFarès Ghedjemis — miss, 0.05 xGGiorgio Cittadini — save, 0.03 xGNikola Krstovic — save, 0.20 xGCharles De Ketelaere — miss, 0.07 xGCharles De Ketelaere — save, 0.12 xGFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.04 xGNicola Zalewski — save, 0.08 xGAleksa Terzic — save, 0.04 xGFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.08 xGRomano Schmid — save, 0.04 xGAleksa Terzic — goal, 0.08 xGFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.03 xGEljif Elmas — save, 0.07 xGGiacomo Calò — save, 0.06 xGAleksa Terzic — save, 0.06 xGAleksa Terzic — miss, 0.04 xGEnzo Tchato — save, 0.06 xGFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.07 xG3.621.55Romano Schmid — goal, 0.11 xGOTGiorgi Kvernadze — save, 0.03 xGOTFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.06 xGOTRomano Schmid — save, 0.02 xGOTEljif Elmas — save, 0.04 xGOTNikola Krstovic — goal, 0.57 xGOTÉderson — save, 0.03 xGOTMarco Carnesecchi — save, 0.02 xGOTRomano Schmid — goal, 0.17 xGOTCharles De Ketelaere — save, 0.25 xGOTCharles De Ketelaere — save, 0.03 xGOTAntonio Raimondo — save, 0.04 xGOTCharles De Ketelaere — save, 0.07 xGOTÉderson — goal, 0.94 xGOTJonathan Rowe — save, 0.09 xGOTÉderson — save, 0.25 xGOTNikola Krstovic — goal, 0.19 xGOTGiacomo Calò — goal, 0.20 xGOTEljif Elmas — goal, 0.46 xGOTGiorgio Cittadini — save, 0.04 xGOTNikola Krstovic — save, 0.12 xGOTCharles De Ketelaere — save, 0.26 xGOTFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.05 xGOTNicola Zalewski — save, 0.23 xGOTAleksa Terzic — save, 0.07 xGOTFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.10 xGOTRomano Schmid — save, 0.04 xGOTAleksa Terzic — goal, 0.21 xGOTFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.22 xGOTEljif Elmas — save, 0.19 xGOTGiacomo Calò — save, 0.03 xGOTAleksa Terzic — save, 0.03 xGOTEnzo Tchato — save, 0.09 xGOTFarès Ghedjemis — save, 0.03 xGOT3.741.540'15'30'45'60'75'90'
AtalantaFrosinonesolid = xG46 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Atalanta
Frosinone

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Atalanta or Frosinone got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 8 of 8 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Atalanta

The question
When Atalanta has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Atalanta's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 31.6% of the time on the ball32%Progression: 28.9% of the time on the ball29%Chance creation: 35.4% of the time on the ball35%Attacking transition: 4.1% of the time on the ball4%35%CHANCE CREATION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up31.6%
Progression28.9%
Chance creation35.4%
Attacking transition4.1%
Vision AI Model Insight
Chance creation is where Atalanta spends most of its time on the ball (35% of its time on the ball).

Frosinone

The question
When Frosinone has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Frosinone's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 8.1% of the time on the ball8%Progression: 45.0% of the time on the ball45%Chance creation: 42.7% of the time on the ball43%Attacking transition: 4.2% of the time on the ball4%45%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up8.1%
Progression45.0%
Chance creation42.7%
Attacking transition4.2%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Frosinone spends most of its time on the ball (45% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Atalanta
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Frosinone
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Atalanta — 559 touches
Frosinone — 599 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Atalanta

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Atalanta actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
365
ACTIONS
8%5%16%6%6%11%7%10%5%5%7%2%4%3%5%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
68
ACTIONS
9%7%12%4%6%4%12%7%6%10%7%3%1%3%7%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (15.5% of all actions). 57% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 43% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 41% defensive, 38% middle, 21% attacking.

Frosinone

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Frosinone actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
416
ACTIONS
2%2%6%2%10%12%12%9%11%10%8%4%3%8%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
81
ACTIONS
1%5%9%1%9%10%9%6%12%17%7%2%5%6%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the right half-space of the middle third (11.3% of all actions). 57% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 43% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 13% defensive, 52% middle, 34% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Atalanta
24%Left side42%Middle34%Right sideATTACKING →
L
24%42%34%
R
Frosinone
35%Left side20%Middle44%Right sideATTACKING →
L
35%20%44%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Atalanta — 24 entries, 42% through the right wing
Left wing: 4 entries (17%)417%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 3 entries (12%)312%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 4 entries (17%)417%CENTRERight half-space: 3 entries (12%)312%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 10 entries (42%)1042%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Frosinone — 53 entries, 34% through the right wing
Left wing: 10 entries (19%)1019%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 6 entries (11%)611%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 5 entries (9%)59%CENTRERight half-space: 14 entries (26%)1426%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 18 entries (34%)1834%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Atalanta

The football question
How does Atalanta progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

152build-up passes attempted
70%completed
29%reach the middle third
3%go long into the final third

Pass types

61CB · 57%
9Long Wide · 8%
2Long Central · 2%
31Wide → FB · 29%
4Central · 4%
CB61 · 57%
left: 36 passes, most from Obric36right: 25 passes, most from Kristensen25
Long Wide9 · 8%
right: 6 passes, most from Carnesecchi6left: 3 passes, most from Carnesecchi3
Long Central2 · 2%
left: 2 passes, most from Carnesecchi2
Wide → FB31 · 29%
left: 17 passes, most from Carnesecchi17right: 14 passes, most from Carnesecchi14
Central4 · 4%
left: 2 passes, most from Pasalic2right: 2 passes, most from Éderson2
◆ Vision AI Insight
Atalanta build predominantly down the right, with Carnesecchi as the fulcrum (24 build-up passes). Only 32% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → C def (7×).

Frosinone

The football question
How does Frosinone progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

53build-up passes attempted
70%completed
46%reach the middle third
3%go long into the final third

Pass types

14CB · 38%
7Long Wide · 19%
12Wide → FB · 32%
4Central · 11%
CB14 · 38%
left: 8 passes, most from Cittadini8right: 6 passes, most from Calvani6
Long Wide7 · 19%
left: 5 passes, most from Palmisani5right: 2 passes, most from Palmisani2
Wide → FB12 · 32%
right: 10 passes, most from Palmisani10left: 2 passes, most from Schmid2
Central4 · 11%
left: 2 passes, most from Palmisani2right: 2 passes, most from Palmisani2
◆ Vision AI Insight
Frosinone build predominantly down the right, with Palmisani as the fulcrum (15 build-up passes). Only 49% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a side that builds forward quickly, progressing the ball more directly. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → RW def (2×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Atalanta

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 54 progressive passes across 1 match (54.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
44%
Right half-space
11%
Central
17%
Left half-space
7%
Left wing
20%
Progression is right-dominant: 56% right side · 17% central · 28% left.

Who generates it

Davide Zappacosta
15 · 28%
Eljif Elmas
8 · 15%
Marco Carnesecchi
7 · 13%
Charles De Ketelaere
6 · 11%
Lorenzo Bernasconi
4 · 7%
Top two — Davide Zappacosta & Eljif Elmas — account for 43% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
54.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
24% reach final third
33% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 76% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 24% of progressive passes reached the final third and 33% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 43% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralsterile
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingbalanced

Frosinone

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 54 progressive passes across 1 match (54.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
39%
Right half-space
17%
Central
15%
Left half-space
13%
Left wing
17%
Progression is right-dominant: 56% right side · 15% central · 30% left.

Who generates it

Giacomo Calò
15 · 28%
Anthony Oyono
10 · 19%
Farès Ghedjemis
8 · 15%
Lorenzo Palmisani
4 · 7%
Gabriele Bracaglia
3 · 6%
Top two — Giacomo Calò & Anthony Oyono — account for 46% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
54.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
28% reach final third
28% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 72% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 28% of progressive passes reached the final third and 28% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 46% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingsterile
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Atalanta

The question
Where do Atalanta's chances actually come from?

Every shot traced back to its source: set pieces, or the pass that set it up (a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box) or no pass at all (the player created it himself).

22shots
3.6xG
0.16xG per shot
3big chances (0.3+ xG)
4goals
Cross: 4 shots (18%)18%4Pass into the box / short pass: 7 shots (32%)32%7Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound): 3 shots (14%)14%3Corner: 7 shots (32%)32%7Penalty: 1 shots (5%)5%122SHOTS
Source of the shotShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Cross410.550.14
Pass into the box / short pass721.250.18
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)300.250.08
Corner700.780.11
Penalty110.790.79

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Charles De Ketelaere20.621
Davide Zappacosta20.301
Nikola Krstovic10.291
Raoul Bellanova10.210
Nicola Zalewski10.120

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Éderson41.301
Nikola Krstovic51.062
Charles De Ketelaere60.550
Eljif Elmas30.441
Jonathan Rowe20.150
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Atalanta's chances, by xG, is pass into the box / short pass (1.2 of 3.6 xG, 7 of 22 shots). 8 of the 22 shots came from set pieces; 4 goals from 3.6 xG (+0.4).

Frosinone

The question
Where do Frosinone's chances actually come from?

Every shot traced back to its source: set pieces, or the pass that set it up (a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box) or no pass at all (the player created it himself).

24shots
1.5xG
0.06xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
4goals
Cross: 4 shots (17%)17%4Cut-back: 3 shots (12%)12%3Long ball: 1 shots (4%)Pass into the box / short pass: 8 shots (33%)33%8Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound): 5 shots (21%)21%5Corner: 3 shots (12%)12%324SHOTS
Source of the shotShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Cross410.300.07
Cut-back320.320.11
Long ball100.060.06
Pass into the box / short pass800.460.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)510.310.06
Corner300.110.04

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Farès Ghedjemis70.533
Gabriele Calvani50.350
Romano Schmid10.090
Enzo Tchato10.070
Giacomo Calò10.060

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Romano Schmid50.412
Farès Ghedjemis60.300
Aleksa Terzic40.231
Antonio Raimondo20.190
Giorgi Kvernadze20.130
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Frosinone's chances, by xG, is pass into the box / short pass (0.5 of 1.5 xG, 8 of 24 shots). 3 of the 24 shots came from set pieces; 4 goals from 1.5 xG (+2.5).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Atalanta

The question
How does Atalanta deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

11 crosses: 8 found a team-mate (73%), 4 led to a shot (36%). 2 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (50%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Frosinone

The question
How does Frosinone deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

24 crosses: 12 found a team-mate (50%), 3 led to a shot (12%). 7 cut-backs: 3 found a team-mate (43%), 3 led to a shot (43%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Atalanta

The question
Which part of the final third does Atalanta actually cross from?

11 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (9%)9%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (9%)9%1advanced right wing: 4 crosses (36%)36%4advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 0 crosses (0%)byline right wing: 5 crosses (45%)45%5byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 0 crosses (0%)
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing545%3
advanced · right wing436%1
deep · right wing19%0
deep · left wing19%0

Frosinone

The question
Which part of the final third does Frosinone actually cross from?

24 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (4%)4%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 2 crosses (8%)8%2advanced right wing: 6 crosses (25%)25%6advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (8%)8%2byline right wing: 9 crosses (38%)38%9byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 4 crosses (17%)17%4
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing938%2
advanced · right wing625%1
byline · left wing417%0
deep · left wing28%0
advanced · left wing28%0
deep · right wing14%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+3.98Atalanta on-ball value
+1.74Frosinone on-ball value
+0.0+2.0+4.0HALF TIME+3.98+1.740′15′30′45′60′75′90′
AtalantaFrosinoneEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Atalanta — where the value came from
Passes365 actions+1.37
Carries68 actions-0.15
Dribbles14 actions+0.03
Shots22 actions+2.50
Ball wins62 actions+0.23
Frosinone — where the value came from
Passes416 actions+0.60
Carries81 actions+0.27
Dribbles12 actions-0.02
Shots24 actions+0.60
Ball wins80 actions+0.29
Atalanta — most valuable players
PlayerActionsOBV
Nikola Krstovic30+1.088
Éderson36+1.056
Charles De Ketelaere63+1.020
Davide Zappacosta65+0.277
Nicola Zalewski30+0.149
Eljif Elmas (lowest)34-0.129
Frosinone — most valuable players
PlayerActionsOBV
Farès Ghedjemis68+0.791
Romano Schmid64+0.291
Lorenzo Palmisani32+0.198
Giorgio Cittadini41+0.134
Giacomo Calò100+0.126
Matteo Cichella (lowest)15-0.052
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Atalanta

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

10 of 29 pass attempts lost here (34%).34%10/29Zappacosta4 of 18 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%4/18Obric20 of 59 pass attempts lost here (34%).34%20/59Carnesecch4 of 23 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%4/23Zalewski7 of 23 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%7/23Zappacosta14 of 39 pass attempts lost here (36%).36%14/39Elmas8 of 26 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%8/26Ketelaere6 of 36 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%6/36Krstovic7 of 17 pass attempts lost here (41%).41%7/17Obric4 of 20 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%4/20Bernasconi5 of 27 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%5/27Ketelaere7 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 of 17 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%3/17Elmasattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
21
Failed forward pass
10
Failed take-on
9
Lost in the defensive third
45
Their weakest zone is the left half-space in the middle third: 41% of 17 pass attempts there are lost (7 times). Separately, 20% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Frosinone

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 of 23 pass attempts lost here (35%).35%8/23Palmisani8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 of 42 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%12/42Calò7 of 48 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%7/48Calò6 of 49 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%6/49Cittadini8 of 38 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%8/38Masini12 of 46 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%12/46Kvernadze13 of 41 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%13/41Calò14 of 33 pass attempts lost here (42%).42%14/33Ghedjemis2 of 18 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%2/18Cittadini14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.17 of 34 pass attempts lost here (50%).50%17/34Calòattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
56
Failed forward pass
33
Failed take-on
8
Lost in the defensive third
16
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the attacking third: 50% of 34 pass attempts there are lost (17 times). Separately, 48% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Atalanta

Not just press intensity, but where the 189 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
12%
Middle third
26%
Own third
62%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.7 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 12% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 26% in midfield.

Where they win it back

17262630189101181286DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

Frosinone

Not just press intensity, but where the 169 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
16%
Middle third
46%
Own third
38%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.3 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 16% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 46% in midfield.

Where they win it back

9112461513141520157665DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Atalanta

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Atalanta win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 32 opposition possessions that Atalanta ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
3.5passes
median 2 · before Atalanta win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
10sec
median 7s · 32.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
50%
28%
19%
3%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.0
6s
15–30′

too few
30–45+′
3.5
6s
45–60′
3.2
12s
60–75′
4.4
13s
75–90+′
3.2
10s
average passesaverage seconds

Frosinone

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Frosinone win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 41 opposition possessions that Frosinone ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
2.5passes
median 2 · before Frosinone win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
7sec
median 2s · 41.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
61%
34%
2%
2%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.0
12s
15–30′
2.8
10s
30–45+′

too few
45–60′
2.4
4s
60–75′
2.3
5s
75–90+′
1.9
6s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Atalanta — 189 actions, 153 won
Frosinone — 169 actions, 122 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Atalanta — 108 wins · 4% in the final third, 22% midfield, 74% own third
own third, right: 24 of 108 wins (22%)22%24 winsown third, centre: 29 of 108 wins (27%)27%29 winsown third, left: 27 of 108 wins (25%)25%27 winsmidfield, right: 7 of 108 wins (6%)6%7 winsmidfield, centre: 3 of 108 wins (3%)3%3 winsmidfield, left: 14 of 108 wins (13%)13%14 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 108 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 0 of 108 wins (0%)final third, left: 3 of 108 wins (3%)3%3 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Nikola Krstovicball-recovery72′90
Nicola Zalewskiball-recovery83′77
Charles De Ketelaereball-recovery52′68
Gianluca Gaetanointerception19′67
Nikola Krstovictackle19′65
Frosinone — 96 wins · 7% in the final third, 51% midfield, 42% own third
own third, right: 12 of 96 wins (12%)12%12 winsown third, centre: 17 of 96 wins (18%)18%17 winsown third, left: 11 of 96 wins (11%)11%11 winsmidfield, right: 17 of 96 wins (18%)18%17 winsmidfield, centre: 10 of 96 wins (10%)10%10 winsmidfield, left: 22 of 96 wins (23%)23%22 winsfinal third, right: 3 of 96 wins (3%)3%3 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 96 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 3 of 96 wins (3%)3%3 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Romano Schmidtackle95′88
Anthony Oyonoball-recovery62′70
Alessio Zerbintackle90′70
Aleksa Terzicball-recovery84′70
Patrizio Masinitackle57′69
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Atalanta

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Atalanta? 54 opponent progressive passes and 24 shots faced (1.5 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Atalanta)

Right wing
38%
Right half-space
17%
Central
13%
Left half-space
15%
Left wing
17%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (38% of the danger conceded).

Frosinone

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Frosinone? 54 opponent progressive passes and 22 shots faced (3.6 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Frosinone)

Right wing
49%
Right half-space
11%
Central
16%
Left half-space
5%
Left wing
19%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (49% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Atalanta

Build-up (own third)

safer, slower, more direct

right 30% · centre 42% · left 28%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
179
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+14.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
31%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.1 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
40% of 82
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
54%
Progression (middle third)

safer, right-sided, less recycling

right 42% · centre 31% · left 27%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
172
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+5.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.1 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
29% of 63
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
60%
Final third

safer, playing short, less recycling

right 44% · centre 20% · left 36%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
96
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
12%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.2 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
53% of 30
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
37%

Frosinone

Build-up (own third)

trying to break lines, safer, more direct

right 34% · centre 50% · left 16%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
68
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+17.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
36%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
73% of 37
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
27%
Progression (middle third)

less recycling, attacking the next line, safer

right 37% · centre 27% · left 36%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
262
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+7.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
14%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
53% of 95
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
51%
Final third

safer, attacking the next line, shorter passing

right 55% · centre 13% · left 32%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
179
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
6%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
30% of 63
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
54%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Atalanta
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Expected goals3.62vs 0.99
Pass accuracy71%vs 85%
Defensive actions189vs 127
Threat from passing9.10vs 5.93
PPDA3.7vs 8.5
Frosinone
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Threat from passing9.86vs 7.02
Final-third entries53vs 36
Progressive passes54vs 44
Field tilt63%vs 48%
PPDA3.3vs 4.1

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Atalanta

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
18%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
52%
Safe / backward
30%
18% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 82% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Frosinone

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
22%
Progressive
0%
Neutral / sideways
49%
Safe / backward
29%
22% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 78% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Atalanta: 8 corners, 3 led to a shot; Frosinone: 9 corners, 3 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Atalanta

8Corners
3Led to a shot
5Free kicks, their half
7Set-piece shots
0.78Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
12%1 corner12%1 corner38%12%1 corner25%2 from the left flag6 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Frosinone

9Corners
3Led to a shot
0Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.11Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
22%2 corners22%11%22%22%5 from the left flag4 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Atalanta
Frosinone

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report