Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-10-25

Genoa v Venezia

0.361.44expected goals
0.421.34xG on target (xGOT)

Genoa won the match; Venezia won the chances (0.36 – 1.44 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Genoa
Venezia
Possession (share of passes)
44.8%55.2%
Duels
4442
Duels won
50.0%50.0%
Aerial duels
2828
Aerial duels won
1216
Successful dribbles
35
Passes
489603
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Genoa above the line, Venezia below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.551.101.65Leo Østigård — save, 0.05 xGJunior Messias — miss, 0.03 xGMario Mitaj — save, 0.04 xGJohn Yeboah — save, 0.13 xGMikael Ellertsson — goal, 0.03 xGJunior Messias — miss, 0.11 xGAntoine Hainaut — save, 0.02 xGJohn Yeboah — save, 0.03 xGAntoine Hainaut — miss, 0.43 xGRedouane Halhal — save, 0.07 xGKike Pérez — save, 0.03 xGAkor Adams — save, 0.07 xGToma Basic — save, 0.05 xGLorenzo Colombo — save, 0.07 xGToma Basic — save, 0.04 xGJuan Jesus — miss, 0.08 xGSimon Sohm — miss, 0.09 xGJohn Yeboah — save, 0.04 xGMatías Moreno — save, 0.03 xGMatteo Dagasso — save, 0.04 xGMatteo Dagasso — miss, 0.04 xGKike Pérez — miss, 0.02 xGAlex Amorim — save, 0.02 xGMatteo Dagasso — miss, 0.07 xGAkor Adams — save, 0.04 xGLion Lauberbach — miss, 0.12 xG0.361.44Leo Østigård — save, 0.04 xGOTMario Mitaj — save, 0.03 xGOTJohn Yeboah — save, 0.09 xGOTMikael Ellertsson — goal, 0.16 xGOTAntoine Hainaut — save, 0.02 xGOTJohn Yeboah — save, 0.10 xGOTRedouane Halhal — save, 0.02 xGOTKike Pérez — save, 0.28 xGOTAkor Adams — save, 0.36 xGOTToma Basic — save, 0.19 xGOTLorenzo Colombo — save, 0.13 xGOTToma Basic — save, 0.08 xGOTJohn Yeboah — save, 0.03 xGOTMatías Moreno — save, 0.06 xGOTMatteo Dagasso — save, 0.02 xGOTAlex Amorim — save, 0.05 xGOTAkor Adams — save, 0.08 xGOT0.421.340'15'30'45'60'75'90'
GenoaVeneziasolid = xG26 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Genoa
Venezia

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Genoa or Venezia got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 1 of 1 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Genoa

The question
When Genoa has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Genoa's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 14.2% of the time on the ball14%Progression: 73.8% of the time on the ball74%Chance creation: 11.6% of the time on the ball12%Attacking transition: 0.4% of the time on the ball74%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up14.2%
Progression73.8%
Chance creation11.6%
Attacking transition0.4%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Genoa spends most of its time on the ball (74% of its time on the ball).

Venezia

The question
When Venezia has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Venezia's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 21.2% of the time on the ball21%Progression: 46.3% of the time on the ball46%Chance creation: 31.0% of the time on the ball31%Attacking transition: 1.5% of the time on the ball46%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up21.2%
Progression46.3%
Chance creation31.0%
Attacking transition1.5%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Venezia spends most of its time on the ball (46% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Genoa
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Venezia
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Genoa — 642 touches
Venezia — 735 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Genoa

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Genoa actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
489
ACTIONS
1%2%8%4%3%11%15%12%15%13%4%2%1%3%4%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
155
ACTIONS
2%3%6%6%1%10%18%14%15%13%5%1%4%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the right half-space of the middle third (15.5% of all actions). 64% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 36% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 20% defensive, 67% middle, 13% attacking.

Venezia

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Venezia actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
603
ACTIONS
2%3%9%6%4%7%8%10%12%9%10%5%3%4%5%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
178
ACTIONS
4%11%3%4%12%8%16%15%11%4%3%1%1%7%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left half-space of the middle third (12.8% of all actions). 61% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 39% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 24% defensive, 51% middle, 25% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Genoa leaned on their left (41%); Venezia leaned on their right (40%).

Genoa
41%Left side18%Middle41%Right sideATTACKING →
L
41%18%41%
R
Venezia
35%Left side25%Middle40%Right sideATTACKING →
L
35%25%40%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Genoa — 34 entries, 32% through the right wing
Left wing: 7 entries (21%)721%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 3 entries (9%)39%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 4 entries (12%)412%CENTRERight half-space: 9 entries (26%)926%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 11 entries (32%)1132%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Venezia — 67 entries, 37% through the right wing
Left wing: 14 entries (21%)1421%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 12 entries (18%)1218%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 9 entries (13%)913%CENTRERight half-space: 7 entries (10%)710%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 25 entries (37%)2537%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Genoa

The football question
How does Genoa progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

97build-up passes attempted
73%completed
30%reach the middle third
3%go long into the final third

Pass types

34CB · 48%
4Long Wide · 6%
28Wide → FB · 39%
5Central · 7%
CB34 · 48%
left: 17 passes, most from Vásquez17right: 17 passes, most from Østigård17
Long Wide4 · 6%
left: 3 passes, most from Bijlow3
Wide → FB28 · 39%
left: 19 passes, most from Bijlow19right: 9 passes, most from Bijlow9
Central5 · 7%
right: 4 passes, most from Bijlow4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Genoa build predominantly down the left, with Bijlow as the fulcrum (23 build-up passes). Only 32% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (6×).

Venezia

The football question
How does Venezia progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

149build-up passes attempted
78%completed
23%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

46CB · 40%
8Long Wide · 7%
41Wide → FB · 35%
21Central · 18%
CB46 · 40%
left: 35 passes, most from Jesus35right: 11 passes, most from Moreno11
Long Wide8 · 7%
right: 5 passes, most from Stankovic5left: 3 passes, most from Stankovic3
Wide → FB41 · 35%
left: 22 passes, most from Stankovic22right: 19 passes, most from Stankovic19
Central21 · 18%
left: 11 passes, most from Stankovic11right: 10 passes, most from Halhal10
◆ Vision AI Insight
Venezia build predominantly down the left, with Stankovic as the fulcrum (34 build-up passes). Only 24% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LHS def → C def (12×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Genoa

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 37 progressive passes across 1 match (37.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
22%
Right half-space
5%
Central
19%
Left half-space
11%
Left wing
43%
Progression is left-dominant: 27% right side · 19% central · 54% left.

Who generates it

Stephan El Shaarawy
9 · 24%
Mario Mitaj
8 · 22%
Hamed Traoré
6 · 16%
Justin Bijlow
4 · 11%
Mikael Ellertsson
3 · 8%
Top two — Stephan El Shaarawy & Mario Mitaj — account for 46% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
37.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
30% reach final third
8% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 70% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 30% of progressive passes reached the final third and 8% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 46% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced

Venezia

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 51 progressive passes across 1 match (51.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
41%
Right half-space
8%
Central
12%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
29%
Progression is right-dominant: 49% right side · 12% central · 39% left.

Who generates it

Antoine Hainaut
8 · 16%
Redouane Halhal
7 · 14%
Kike Pérez
6 · 12%
Matteo Dagasso
6 · 12%
Filip Stankovic
5 · 10%
Top two — Antoine Hainaut & Redouane Halhal — account for 29% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
51.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
22% reach final third
24% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 78% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 22% of progressive passes reached the final third and 24% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 29% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Genoa

The question
Where do Genoa's chances actually come from?

Every shot traced back to its source: set pieces, or the pass that set it up (a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box) or no pass at all (the player created it himself).

7shots
0.4xG
0.05xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Long ball: 2 shots (29%)29%2Pass into the box / short pass: 4 shots (57%)57%4Corner: 1 shots (14%)14%17SHOTS
Source of the shotShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Long ball210.060.03
Pass into the box / short pass400.270.07
Corner100.020.02

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Stephan El Shaarawy20.141
Milutin Osmajic10.070
Mario Mitaj10.050
Junior Messias10.040
Samuel Wiafe10.030

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Junior Messias20.140
Lorenzo Colombo10.070
Leo Østigård10.050
Mario Mitaj10.040
Mikael Ellertsson10.031
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Genoa's chances, by xG, is pass into the box / short pass (0.3 of 0.4 xG, 4 of 7 shots). 1 of the 7 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 0.4 xG (+0.6).

Venezia

The question
Where do Venezia's chances actually come from?

Every shot traced back to its source: set pieces, or the pass that set it up (a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box) or no pass at all (the player created it himself).

19shots
1.4xG
0.08xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Cross: 2 shots (11%)11%2Cut-back: 2 shots (11%)11%2Pass into the box / short pass: 5 shots (26%)26%5Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound): 1 shots (5%)5%1Corner: 8 shots (42%)42%8Free kick: 1 shots (5%)5%119SHOTS
Source of the shotShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Cross200.500.25
Cut-back200.240.12
Pass into the box / short pass500.180.04
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.070.07
Corner800.400.05
Free kick100.050.05

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Ridgeciano Haps10.430
Pasquale Mazzocchi20.160
Akor Adams10.130
Antoine Hainaut20.100
Matías Moreno10.040

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Antoine Hainaut20.450
John Yeboah30.200
Matteo Dagasso30.150
Lion Lauberbach10.120
Akor Adams20.110
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Venezia's chances, by xG, is cross (0.5 of 1.4 xG, 2 of 19 shots). 9 of the 19 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 1.4 xG (-1.4).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Genoa

The question
How does Genoa deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

9 crosses: 1 found a team-mate (11%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 0 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (—), 0 led to a shot (—).

Venezia

The question
How does Venezia deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

19 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (26%), 3 led to a shot (16%). 3 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (67%), 2 led to a shot (67%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Genoa

The question
Which part of the final third does Genoa actually cross from?

9 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 5 crosses (56%)56%5advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 1 crosses (11%)11%1byline right wing: 2 crosses (22%)22%2byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 1 crosses (11%)11%1
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing556%0
byline · right wing222%0
advanced · left wing111%0
byline · left wing111%0

Venezia

The question
Which part of the final third does Venezia actually cross from?

19 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (5%)5%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 6 crosses (32%)32%6advanced right half-space: 1 crosses (5%)5%1advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 5 crosses (26%)26%5byline right wing: 3 crosses (16%)16%3byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 3 crosses (16%)16%3
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing632%0
advanced · left wing526%1
byline · right wing316%0
byline · left wing316%1
deep · right wing15%1
advanced · right half-space15%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+0.70Genoa on-ball value
+0.81Venezia on-ball value
+0.0+0.4+0.8HALF TIME+0.70+0.810′15′30′45′60′75′90′
GenoaVeneziaEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Genoa — where the value came from
Passes489 actions+0.29
Carries155 actions-0.01
Dribbles11 actions-0.01
Shots7 actions+0.19
Ball wins60 actions+0.25
Venezia — where the value came from
Passes603 actions+0.15
Carries178 actions-0.03
Dribbles12 actions-0.02
Shots19 actions+0.55
Ball wins57 actions+0.16
Genoa — most valuable players
PlayerActionsOBV
Hamed Traoré93+0.171
Leo Østigård110+0.121
Stephan El Shaarawy56+0.119
Junior Messias33+0.084
Johan Vásquez129+0.070
Lorenzo Colombo (lowest)11-0.064
Venezia — most valuable players
PlayerActionsOBV
Matteo Dagasso40+0.267
Pasquale Mazzocchi30+0.194
Filip Stankovic59+0.136
Toma Basic48+0.130
Antoine Hainaut46+0.104
Kike Pérez (lowest)98-0.227
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Genoa

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

7 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 of 41 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%8/41Bijlow4 of 20 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%4/20Traoré9 of 17 pass attempts lost here (53%).53%9/17Mitaj11 of 53 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%11/53Otoa8 of 72 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%8/72Messias8 of 59 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%8/59Traoré4 of 74 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%4/74Vásquez8 of 65 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%8/65Mitaj7 of 21 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%7/21Otoa11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 of 18 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%3/18Shaarawyattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
20
Failed forward pass
16
Failed take-on
8
Lost in the defensive third
26
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 53% of 17 pass attempts there are lost (9 times). Separately, 24% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Venezia

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 of 17 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%3/17Hainaut11 of 57 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%11/57Stankovic3 of 35 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%3/35Stankovic11 of 27 pass attempts lost here (41%).41%11/27Jesus5 of 43 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%5/43Halhal2 of 50 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%2/50Adams4 of 63 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%4/63Jesus5 of 74 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%5/74Sohm3 of 56 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%3/56Adams12 of 62 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%12/62Hainaut8 of 32 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%8/32Pérez4 of 16 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%4/16Yeboah10 of 26 pass attempts lost here (38%).38%10/26Adams10 of 32 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%10/32Mazzocchiattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
44
Failed forward pass
33
Failed take-on
7
Lost in the defensive third
33
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 41% of 27 pass attempts there are lost (11 times). Separately, 46% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Genoa

Not just press intensity, but where the 161 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
12%
Middle third
35%
Own third
52%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 5.7 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 12% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 35% in midfield.

Where they win it back

97431510137713179DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

Venezia

Not just press intensity, but where the 141 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
15%
Middle third
41%
Own third
44%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 6.3 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 15% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 41% in midfield.

Where they win it back

59191811141391012593DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Genoa

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Genoa win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 32 opposition possessions that Genoa ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
6.2passes
median 4 · before Genoa win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
17sec
median 10s · 32.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
31%
41%
6%
22%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.8
9s
15–30′
7.4
22s
30–45+′
3.3
16s
45–60′
5.7
14s
60–75′
10.9
29s
75–90+′
3.2
9s
average passesaverage seconds

Venezia

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Venezia win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 33 opposition possessions that Venezia ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.8passes
median 2 · before Venezia win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
14sec
median 5s · 33.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
61%
12%
9%
18%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′

too few
15–30′
5.8
15s
30–45+′
8.8
26s
45–60′
3.0
7s
60–75′
3.9
14s
75–90+′
1.2
2s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Genoa — 161 actions, 127 won
Venezia — 141 actions, 109 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Genoa — 96 wins · 2% in the final third, 31% midfield, 67% own third
own third, right: 10 of 96 wins (10%)10%10 winsown third, centre: 38 of 96 wins (40%)40%38 winsown third, left: 16 of 96 wins (17%)17%16 winsmidfield, right: 10 of 96 wins (10%)10%10 winsmidfield, centre: 7 of 96 wins (7%)7%7 winsmidfield, left: 13 of 96 wins (14%)14%13 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 96 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 0 of 96 wins (0%)final third, left: 1 of 96 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Lorenzo Colomboball-recovery82′68
Junior Messiasball-recovery25′67
Samuel Wiafeball-recovery66′66
Mario Mitajball-recovery9′64
Hamed Traoréinterception82′60
Venezia — 74 wins · 3% in the final third, 34% midfield, 64% own third
own third, right: 10 of 74 wins (14%)14%10 winsown third, centre: 18 of 74 wins (24%)24%18 winsown third, left: 19 of 74 wins (26%)26%19 winsmidfield, right: 9 of 74 wins (12%)12%9 winsmidfield, centre: 9 of 74 wins (12%)12%9 winsmidfield, left: 7 of 74 wins (9%)9%7 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 74 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 0 of 74 wins (0%)final third, left: 1 of 74 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Akor Adamsball-recovery51′80
Matteo Dagassoball-recovery85′71
Matías Morenointerception57′66
Simon Sohminterception51′65
Ridgeciano Hapsball-recovery67′65
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Genoa

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Genoa? 51 opponent progressive passes and 19 shots faced (1.4 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Genoa)

Right wing
39%
Right half-space
6%
Central
16%
Left half-space
5%
Left wing
34%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (39% of the danger conceded).

Venezia

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Venezia? 37 opponent progressive passes and 7 shots faced (0.4 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Venezia)

Right wing
23%
Right half-space
4%
Central
26%
Left half-space
21%
Left wing
26%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (26% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Genoa

Build-up (own third)

safer, less recycling, left-sided

right 20% · centre 45% · left 36%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
128
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+13.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
23%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
60% of 52
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
42%
Progression (middle third)

safer, playing short

right 36% · centre 27% · left 38%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
436
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
25%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
40% of 63
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
67%
Final third

safer, trying to break lines, attacking the next line

right 48% · centre 10% · left 42%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
91
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
13%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
18% of 34
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
44%

Venezia

Build-up (own third)

safer, left-sided

right 19% · centre 44% · left 37%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
190
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+10.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
17%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
55% of 62
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
50%
Progression (middle third)

safer, kept on the floor

right 28% · centre 33% · left 39%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
398
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
28%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.4 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
58% of 62
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
39%
Final third

safer, right-sided

right 52% · centre 13% · left 36%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
205
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
14%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
12%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
33% of 45
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
56%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Genoa
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Expected goals0.36vs 0.90
Defensive actions161vs 144
Pass accuracy83%vs 76%
Passes489vs 422
Field tilt31%vs 40%
Venezia
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Final-third entries67vs 41
Progressive carries73vs 50
Field tilt69%vs 52%
Passes603vs 520
Progressive passes51vs 46

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Genoa

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
8%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
56%
Safe / backward
34%
10% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 90% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Venezia

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
11%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
52%
Safe / backward
36%
12% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 88% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Genoa: 2 corners, 1 led to a shot; Venezia: 10 corners, 8 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Genoa

2Corners
1Led to a shot
5Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.02Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
50%1 corner50%1 corner2 from the left flag0 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Venezia

10Corners
8Led to a shot
2Free kicks, their half
9Set-piece shots
0.45Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
10%1 corner70%10%1 corner10%6 from the left flag4 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Genoa
Venezia

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report