Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-10-25

Inter v Fiorentina

InterHome
2–1
FiorentinaAway
3.220.32expected goals
2.500.44xG on target (xGOT)

Inter won by more than the chances suggest (3.22 – 0.32 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Inter
Fiorentina
Possession (share of passes)
62.9%37.1%
Duels
4848
Duels won
52.1%47.9%
Aerial duels
2525
Aerial duels won
1213
Successful dribbles
63
Passes
618364
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Inter above the line, Fiorentina below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
1.242.473.71Franco Mastantuono — save, 0.02 xGCher Ndour — save, 0.03 xGNicolò Barella — save, 0.04 xGCarlos Augusto — miss, 0.07 xGHenrikh Mkhitaryan — miss, 0.08 xGAndy Diouf — miss, 0.06 xGFrancesco Pio Esposito — miss, 0.11 xGMarcus Thuram — save, 0.05 xGFrancesco Pio Esposito — save, 0.06 xGValde — save, 0.04 xGMarcus Thuram — miss, 0.08 xGNicolò Barella — miss, 0.04 xGMarcus Thuram — miss, 0.21 xGMateo Pellegrino — save, 0.08 xGMarcus Thuram — save, 0.09 xGHenrikh Mkhitaryan — miss, 0.03 xGMarcus Thuram — save, 0.12 xGAndy Diouf — miss, 0.05 xGÁlex Jiménez — goal, 0.03 xGAnge-Yoan Bonny — save, 0.06 xGNicolò Barella — miss, 0.08 xGHakan Çalhanoglu — miss, 0.03 xGAnge-Yoan Bonny — miss, 0.05 xGMarcus Thuram — save, 0.08 xGCarlos Augusto — post, 0.06 xGHakan Çalhanoglu — miss, 0.06 xGAnge-Yoan Bonny — save, 0.06 xGManuel Akanji — miss, 0.07 xGFranco Mastantuono — save, 0.07 xGHenrikh Mkhitaryan — save, 0.04 xGWilfried Gnonto — save, 0.05 xGMarcus Thuram — miss, 0.08 xGPetar Sucic — save, 0.10 xGMarcus Thuram — goal, 0.09 xGCarlos Augusto — miss, 0.03 xGMatteo Lavelli — save, 0.14 xGFederico Dimarco — save, 0.08 xGMarcus Thuram — save, 0.12 xGMatteo Lavelli — save, 0.09 xGPiotr Zielinski — goal, 0.79 xG3.220.32Franco Mastantuono — save, 0.05 xGOTCher Ndour — save, 0.06 xGOTNicolò Barella — save, 0.10 xGOTMarcus Thuram — save, 0.12 xGOTFrancesco Pio Esposito — save, 0.06 xGOTValde — save, 0.10 xGOTMateo Pellegrino — save, 0.06 xGOTMarcus Thuram — save, 0.31 xGOTMarcus Thuram — save, 0.05 xGOTÁlex Jiménez — goal, 0.12 xGOTAnge-Yoan Bonny — save, 0.12 xGOTMarcus Thuram — save, 0.04 xGOTAnge-Yoan Bonny — save, 0.03 xGOTFranco Mastantuono — save, 0.03 xGOTHenrikh Mkhitaryan — save, 0.02 xGOTWilfried Gnonto — save, 0.03 xGOTPetar Sucic — save, 0.04 xGOTMarcus Thuram — goal, 0.38 xGOTMatteo Lavelli — save, 0.06 xGOTFederico Dimarco — save, 0.15 xGOTMarcus Thuram — save, 0.07 xGOTMatteo Lavelli — save, 0.03 xGOTPiotr Zielinski — goal, 0.93 xGOT2.500.440'15'30'45'60'75'90'
InterFiorentinasolid = xG40 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Inter
Fiorentina

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Inter or Fiorentina got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 3 of 3 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Inter

The question
When Inter has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Inter's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 20.0% of the time on the ball20%Progression: 40.9% of the time on the ball41%Chance creation: 37.2% of the time on the ball37%Attacking transition: 2.0% of the time on the ball41%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up20.0%
Progression40.9%
Chance creation37.2%
Attacking transition2.0%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Inter spends most of its time on the ball (41% of its time on the ball).

Fiorentina

The question
When Fiorentina has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Fiorentina's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 37.0% of the time on the ball37%Progression: 47.3% of the time on the ball47%Chance creation: 14.9% of the time on the ball15%Attacking transition: 0.9% of the time on the ball47%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up37.0%
Progression47.3%
Chance creation14.9%
Attacking transition0.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Fiorentina spends most of its time on the ball (47% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Inter
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Fiorentina
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Inter — 795 touches
Fiorentina — 536 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Inter

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Inter actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
618
ACTIONS
2%2%7%3%2%5%13%12%11%7%6%4%4%7%15%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
162
ACTIONS
1%2%10%6%1%4%12%14%8%11%7%4%4%4%11%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left wing of the attacking third (14.0% of all actions). 64% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 36% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 17% defensive, 49% middle, 34% attacking.

Fiorentina

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Fiorentina actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
364
ACTIONS
9%6%18%7%2%14%10%8%7%6%3%2%2%3%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
58
ACTIONS
7%5%12%7%2%10%7%7%17%3%10%2%3%7%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (17.5% of all actions). 62% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 38% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 42% defensive, 45% middle, 13% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Inter leaned on their left (44%); Fiorentina leaned on their left (41%).

Inter
44%Left side28%Middle28%Right sideATTACKING →
L
44%28%28%
R
Fiorentina
41%Left side20%Middle39%Right sideATTACKING →
L
41%20%39%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Inter — 86 entries, 38% through the left wing
Left wing: 33 entries (38%)3338%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 15 entries (17%)1517%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 12 entries (14%)1214%CENTRERight half-space: 8 entries (9%)89%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 18 entries (21%)1821%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Fiorentina — 20 entries, 50% through the right wing
Left wing: 4 entries (20%)420%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 4 entries (20%)420%LEFT HALF-SPACE00%CENTRERight half-space: 2 entries (10%)210%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 10 entries (50%)1050%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Inter

The football question
How does Inter progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

99build-up passes attempted
93%completed
24%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

25CB · 27%
10Long Wide · 11%
33Wide → FB · 36%
24Central · 26%
CB25 · 27%
left: 13 passes, most from Akanji13right: 12 passes, most from Bisseck12
Long Wide10 · 11%
left: 7 passes, most from Provedel7right: 3 passes, most from Sucic3
Wide → FB33 · 36%
left: 21 passes, most from Provedel21right: 12 passes, most from Provedel12
Central24 · 26%
right: 16 passes, most from Provedel16left: 8 passes, most from Provedel8
◆ Vision AI Insight
Inter build predominantly down the left, with Provedel as the fulcrum (30 build-up passes). Only 25% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LHS def → C def (11×).

Fiorentina

The football question
How does Fiorentina progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

158build-up passes attempted
72%completed
39%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

48CB · 42%
10Long Wide · 9%
3Long Central · 3%
46Wide → FB · 40%
7Central · 6%
CB48 · 42%
right: 32 passes, most from Jiménez32left: 16 passes, most from Pongracic16
Long Wide10 · 9%
right: 7 passes, most from Gea7left: 3 passes, most from Gea3
Long Central3 · 3%
right: 3 passes, most from Gea3
Wide → FB46 · 40%
right: 27 passes, most from Gea27left: 19 passes, most from Gea19
Central7 · 6%
right: 5 passes, most from Fagioli5left: 2 passes, most from Valde2
◆ Vision AI Insight
Fiorentina build predominantly down the right, with Gea as the fulcrum (32 build-up passes). Only 39% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (11×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Inter

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 55 progressive passes across 1 match (55.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
25%
Right half-space
15%
Central
16%
Left half-space
13%
Left wing
31%
Progression is left-dominant: 40% right side · 16% central · 44% left.

Who generates it

Nicolò Barella
10 · 18%
Carlos Augusto
9 · 16%
Hakan Çalhanoglu
7 · 13%
Manuel Akanji
5 · 9%
Andy Diouf
5 · 9%
Top two — Nicolò Barella & Carlos Augusto — account for 35% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
55.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
27% reach final third
42% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 73% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 27% of progressive passes reached the final third and 42% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 35% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient

Fiorentina

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 29 progressive passes across 1 match (29.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
24%
Right half-space
10%
Central
28%
Left half-space
0%
Left wing
38%
Progression is left-dominant: 34% right side · 28% central · 38% left.

Who generates it

David de Gea
7 · 24%
Valde
5 · 17%
Radu Dragusin
3 · 10%
Álex Jiménez
3 · 10%
Nicolò Fagioli
3 · 10%
Top two — David de Gea & Valde — account for 41% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
29.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
10% reach final third
14% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 90% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 10% of progressive passes reached the final third and 14% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 41% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingsterile
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralefficient
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Inter

The question
Where do Inter's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

33shots
3.2xG
0.10xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 8 shots (24%)24%8Settled attack: 21 shots (64%)64%21Set piece: 4 shots (12%)12%433SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 24% of shots810.440.05
Pass into the box / short pass510.310.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)300.130.04
Settled attack 64% of shots2101.790.09
Cross700.540.08
Cut-back200.210.11
Pass into the box / short pass800.750.09
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)400.290.07
Set piece 12% of shots411.000.25
Corner300.200.07
Penalty110.790.79

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Carlos Augusto50.600
Manuel Akanji40.310
Alessandro Bastoni40.230
Hakan Çalhanoglu30.230
Yann Bisseck20.180

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Marcus Thuram90.931
Piotr Zielinski10.791
Matteo Lavelli20.230
Francesco Pio Esposito20.170
Ange-Yoan Bonny30.160
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Inter's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.8 of 3.2 xG, 21 of 33 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 8 of the 33 shots (24%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 4 of the 33 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 3.2 xG (-1.2).

Fiorentina

The question
Where do Fiorentina's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

7shots
0.3xG
0.05xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 2 shots (29%)29%2Settled attack: 4 shots (57%)57%4Set piece: 1 shots (14%)14%17SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 29% of shots210.110.05
Pass into the box / short pass210.110.05
Settled attack 57% of shots400.190.05
Long ball100.070.07
Pass into the box / short pass100.030.03
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.100.05
Set piece 14% of shots100.020.02
Free kick100.020.02

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Franco Mastantuono10.080
Mateo Pellegrino10.070
Valde10.030
Nicolò Fagioli10.031

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Franco Mastantuono20.090
Mateo Pellegrino10.080
Wilfried Gnonto10.050
Valde10.040
Cher Ndour10.030
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Fiorentina's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.2 of 0.3 xG, 4 of 7 shots), mostly own creation (carry, dribble, rebound). 2 of the 7 shots (29%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 1 of the 7 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 0.3 xG (+0.7).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Inter

The question
How does Inter deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

31 crosses: 15 found a team-mate (48%), 6 led to a shot (19%). 6 cut-backs: 4 found a team-mate (67%), 2 led to a shot (33%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Fiorentina

The question
How does Fiorentina deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

6 crosses: 2 found a team-mate (33%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 2 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (50%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Inter

The question
Which part of the final third does Inter actually cross from?

31 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 2 crosses (6%)6%2deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 6 crosses (19%)19%6advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 7 crosses (23%)23%7byline right wing: 5 crosses (16%)16%5byline right half-space: 1 crosses (3%)3%1byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 10 crosses (32%)32%10
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing1032%3
advanced · left wing723%2
advanced · right wing619%1
byline · right wing516%0
deep · right wing26%0
byline · right half-space13%0

Fiorentina

The question
Which part of the final third does Fiorentina actually cross from?

6 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (17%)17%1advanced right wing: 1 crosses (17%)17%1advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (33%)33%2byline right wing: 1 crosses (17%)17%1byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 1 crosses (17%)17%1
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · left wing233%0
deep · left wing117%0
advanced · right wing117%0
byline · right wing117%0
byline · left wing117%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+3.51Inter on-ball value
+0.95Fiorentina on-ball value
+0.0+1.8+3.5HALF TIME+3.51+0.950′15′30′45′60′75′90′
InterFiorentinaEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Inter — where the value came from
Passes618 actions+0.68
Carries162 actions+0.28
Dribbles16 actions+0.01
Shots33 actions+2.20
Ball wins74 actions+0.34
Fiorentina — where the value came from
Passes364 actions+0.43
Carries58 actions+0.07
Dribbles16 actions-0.01
Shots7 actions+0.19
Ball wins38 actions+0.26
Inter — most valuable players
PlayerActionsOBV
Marcus Thuram43+0.695
Piotr Zielinski23+0.680
Nicolò Barella96+0.432
Carlos Augusto80+0.335
Matteo Lavelli5+0.299
Federico Dimarco (lowest)26-0.199
Fiorentina — most valuable players
PlayerActionsOBV
Cher Ndour44+0.267
David de Gea55+0.263
Franco Mastantuono40+0.243
Álex Jiménez61+0.186
Marin Pongracic30+0.066
Nicolò Fagioli (lowest)65-0.132
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Inter

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 of 43 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%3/43Mkhitaryan0 of 21 pass attempts lost here (0%).0%0/2111 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 32 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%6/32Barella6 of 79 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%6/79Diouf1 of 74 pass attempts lost here (1%).1%1/74Thuram4 of 71 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%4/71Akanji7 of 44 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%7/44Mkhitaryan7 of 35 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%7/35Barella9 of 27 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%9/27Diouf3 of 24 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%3/24Thuram7 of 42 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%7/42Augusto21 of 91 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%21/91Mkhitaryanattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
47
Failed forward pass
29
Failed take-on
10
Lost in the defensive third
7
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the attacking third: 33% of 27 pass attempts there are lost (9 times). Separately, 60% of all losses happen in the attacking third — cheap, low-risk turnovers.

Fiorentina

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

11 of 34 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%11/34Jiménez3 of 23 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%3/23Jiménez22 of 67 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%22/67Gea4 of 26 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%4/26Viery8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 of 50 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%4/50Ndour6 of 35 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%6/35Fagioli6 of 29 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%6/29Ndour4 of 26 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%4/26Brescianin5 of 23 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%5/23Valde12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.attacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
10
Failed forward pass
8
Failed take-on
13
Lost in the defensive third
44
Their weakest zone is the central in the defensive third: 33% of 67 pass attempts there are lost (22 times). Separately, 13% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Inter

Not just press intensity, but where the 159 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
27%
Middle third
43%
Own third
30%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.1 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 27% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 43% in midfield.

Where they win it back

811121161718139116711109DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

Fiorentina

Not just press intensity, but where the 150 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
6%
Middle third
31%
Own third
63%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 7.6 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 6% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 31% in midfield.

Where they win it back

151440141112671210DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Inter

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Inter win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 39 opposition possessions that Inter ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.0passes
median 2 · before Inter win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
12sec
median 4s · 39.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
59%
23%
10%
8%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.8
10s
15–30′
7.0
23s
30–45+′
2.7
9s
45–60′
5.6
16s
60–75′
2.5
3s
75–90+′
2.1
8s
average passesaverage seconds

Fiorentina

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Fiorentina win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 21 opposition possessions that Fiorentina ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
7.3passes
median 6 · before Fiorentina win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
22sec
median 17s · 21.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
29%
19%
14%
38%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
9.2
30s
15–30′

too few
30–45+′
8.8
26s
45–60′
4.6
12s
60–75′
6.2
16s
75–90+′

too few
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Inter — 159 actions, 123 won
Fiorentina — 150 actions, 111 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Inter — 87 wins · 22% in the final third, 39% midfield, 39% own third
own third, right: 12 of 87 wins (14%)14%12 winsown third, centre: 11 of 87 wins (13%)13%11 winsown third, left: 11 of 87 wins (13%)13%11 winsmidfield, right: 17 of 87 wins (20%)20%17 winsmidfield, centre: 10 of 87 wins (11%)11%10 winsmidfield, left: 7 of 87 wins (8%)8%7 winsfinal third, right: 5 of 87 wins (6%)6%5 winsfinal third, centre: 3 of 87 wins (3%)3%3 winsfinal third, left: 11 of 87 wins (13%)13%11 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Ange-Yoan Bonnyball-recovery72′95
Matteo Lavelliball-recovery93′88
Nicolò Barellaball-recovery17′87
Nicolò Barellatackle78′81
Francesco Pio Espositoball-recovery46′77
Fiorentina — 74 wins · 0% in the final third, 15% midfield, 85% own third
own third, right: 15 of 74 wins (20%)20%15 winsown third, centre: 37 of 74 wins (50%)50%37 winsown third, left: 11 of 74 wins (15%)15%11 winsmidfield, right: 7 of 74 wins (9%)9%7 winsmidfield, centre: 2 of 74 wins (3%)3%2 winsmidfield, left: 2 of 74 wins (3%)3%2 winsfinal third, right: 0 of 74 wins (0%)final third, centre: 0 of 74 wins (0%)final third, left: 0 of 74 wins (0%)
Highest winsTypeMinx
Radu Dragusintackle53′65
Nicolò Fagioliball-recovery65′60
Radu Dragusinball-recovery53′56
Álex Jiméneztackle19′55
Cher Ndourtackle51′46
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Inter

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Inter? 29 opponent progressive passes and 7 shots faced (0.3 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Inter)

Right wing
19%
Right half-space
11%
Central
38%
Left half-space
0%
Left wing
32%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the central (38% of the danger conceded).

Fiorentina

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Fiorentina? 55 opponent progressive passes and 33 shots faced (3.2 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Fiorentina)

Right wing
28%
Right half-space
16%
Central
12%
Left half-space
9%
Left wing
36%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (36% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Inter

Build-up (own third)

safer, circulating, narrow, central

right 22% · centre 48% · left 30%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
132
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+7.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
25%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
16%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
91% of 35
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
14%
Progression (middle third)

safer, played inside, less recycling

right 31% · centre 36% · left 33%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
384
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
6%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
65% of 75
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
39%
Final third

safer, left-sided, kept on the floor

right 30% · centre 15% · left 55%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
280
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
5%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
41% of 63
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
41%

Fiorentina

Build-up (own third)

safer, right-sided, less recycling

right 33% · centre 49% · left 18%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
180
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+14.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
11%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
27%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
46% of 69
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
59%
Progression (middle third)

safer, right-sided, circulating

right 45% · centre 25% · left 31%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
193
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
14%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
39% of 51
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
51%
Final third

safer, less recycling, longer passing

right 43% · centre 11% · left 46%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
65
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
25% of 20
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
55%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Inter
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Final-third entries86vs 57
Threat from passing10.53vs 8.03
PPDA3.1vs 4.8
Defensive actions159vs 133
Progressive carries77vs 64
Fiorentina
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Field tilt18%vs 54%
Final-third entries20vs 44
Progressive carries21vs 53
Pass accuracy78%vs 81%
Expected goals0.32vs 1.54

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Inter

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
17%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
47%
Safe / backward
36%
17% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 83% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Fiorentina

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
12%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
56%
Safe / backward
31%
13% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 87% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Inter: 6 corners, 3 led to a shot; Fiorentina: 1 corner, 0 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Inter

6Corners
3Led to a shot
6Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.20Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
17%1 corner33%17%33%4 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Fiorentina

1Corners
0Led to a shot
2Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.02Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
100%1 corner0 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Inter
Fiorentina

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report