Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportSerie A 2026-10-24

Lazio v Parma Calcio 1913

LazioHome
2–1
Parma Calcio 1913Away
1.520.73expected goals
1.281.35xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (1.52 – 0.73 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Lazio
Parma Calcio 1913
Possession (share of passes)
67.8%32.2%
Duels
5262
Duels won
51.9%45.2%
Aerial duels
3636
Aerial duels won
1719
Successful dribbles
83
Passes
701333
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Lazio above the line, Parma Calcio 1913 below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.581.161.74Gustav Isaksen — miss, 0.08 xGDavid Romero — save, 0.18 xGMariano Troilo — miss, 0.07 xGEl Bilal Touré — save, 0.05 xGEnrico Delprato — miss, 0.03 xGDavide Frattesi — miss, 0.06 xGGustav Isaksen — miss, 0.09 xGGustav Isaksen — save, 0.07 xGReda Belahyane — save, 0.04 xGGustav Isaksen — post, 0.08 xGDavid Romero — save, 0.06 xGEnrico Delprato — miss, 0.15 xGMattia Zaccagni — save, 0.02 xGTijjani Noslin — miss, 0.08 xGKenneth Taylor — save, 0.04 xGRomano Floriani Mussolini — save, 0.04 xGTijjani Noslin — miss, 0.06 xGDiogo Leite — miss, 0.03 xGKenneth Taylor — goal, 0.06 xGRomano Floriani Mussolini — miss, 0.04 xGDavide Frattesi — miss, 0.20 xGMattia Zaccagni — miss, 0.12 xGMattia Zaccagni — save, 0.04 xGGustav Isaksen — save, 0.02 xGSimone Lontani — save, 0.08 xGEl Bilal Touré — miss, 0.05 xGFisayo Dele-Bashiru — miss, 0.05 xGDavide Frattesi — miss, 0.15 xGNuno Tavares — miss, 0.12 xGSimone Lontani — miss, 0.04 xGSimone Lontani — goal, 0.03 xG1.520.73David Romero — save, 0.27 xGOTEl Bilal Touré — save, 0.33 xGOTGustav Isaksen — save, 0.34 xGOTReda Belahyane — save, 0.18 xGOTDavid Romero — save, 0.31 xGOTMattia Zaccagni — save, 0.02 xGOTKenneth Taylor — save, 0.23 xGOTRomano Floriani Mussolini — save, 0.17 xGOTKenneth Taylor — goal, 0.25 xGOTMattia Zaccagni — save, 0.02 xGOTGustav Isaksen — save, 0.07 xGOTSimone Lontani — save, 0.35 xGOTSimone Lontani — goal, 0.10 xGOT1.281.350'15'30'45'60'75'90'
LazioParma Calcio 1913solid = xG31 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Lazio
Parma Calcio 1913

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Lazio or Parma Calcio 1913 got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 3 of 3 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Lazio

The question
When Lazio has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Lazio's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 11.6% of the time on the ball12%Progression: 52.4% of the time on the ball52%Chance creation: 33.1% of the time on the ball33%Attacking transition: 2.9% of the time on the ball52%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up11.6%
Progression52.4%
Chance creation33.1%
Attacking transition2.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Lazio spends most of its time on the ball (52% of its time on the ball).

Parma Calcio 1913

The question
When Parma Calcio 1913 has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Parma Calcio 1913's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 19.3% of the time on the ball19%Progression: 43.8% of the time on the ball44%Chance creation: 36.2% of the time on the ball36%Attacking transition: 0.8% of the time on the ball44%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up19.3%
Progression43.8%
Chance creation36.2%
Attacking transition0.8%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Parma Calcio 1913 spends most of its time on the ball (44% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Lazio
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Parma Calcio 1913
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Lazio — 876 touches
Parma Calcio 1913 — 487 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Lazio

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Lazio actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
701
ACTIONS
3%4%6%2%1%8%8%10%11%15%4%4%4%6%17%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
155
ACTIONS
2%4%5%3%11%8%9%10%20%3%5%1%5%13%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left wing of the attacking third (16.2% of all actions). 51% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 49% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 15% defensive, 52% middle, 33% attacking.

Parma Calcio 1913

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Parma Calcio 1913 actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
333
ACTIONS
6%7%14%6%2%8%8%10%9%8%4%2%3%4%9%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
65
ACTIONS
2%6%8%8%2%8%6%15%8%9%9%2%6%12%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (13.1% of all actions). 62% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 38% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 34% defensive, 43% middle, 23% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Lazio
53%Left side24%Middle24%Right sideATTACKING →
L
53%24%24%
R
Parma Calcio 1913
44%Left side26%Middle30%Right sideATTACKING →
L
44%26%30%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Lazio — 67 entries, 58% through the left wing
Left wing: 39 entries (58%)3958%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 5 entries (7%)57%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 3 entries (4%)34%CENTRERight half-space: 7 entries (10%)710%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 13 entries (19%)1319%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Parma Calcio 1913 — 29 entries, 31% through the left wing
Left wing: 9 entries (31%)931%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 8 entries (28%)828%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 3 entries (10%)310%CENTRERight half-space: 3 entries (10%)310%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 6 entries (21%)621%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Lazio

The football question
How does Lazio progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

103build-up passes attempted
84%completed
42%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third

Pass types

32CB · 37%
13Long Wide · 15%
1Long Central · 1%
30Wide → FB · 34%
11Central · 13%
CB32 · 37%
right: 25 passes, most from Sutalo25left: 7 passes, most from Sutalo7
Long Wide13 · 15%
left: 8 passes, most from Mandas8right: 5 passes, most from Mandas5
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB30 · 34%
right: 19 passes, most from Belahyane19left: 11 passes, most from Mandas11
Central11 · 13%
left: 6 passes, most from Mandas6right: 5 passes, most from Mandas5
◆ Vision AI Insight
Lazio build predominantly down the right, with Mandas as the fulcrum (26 build-up passes). Only 45% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a side that builds forward quickly, progressing the ball more directly. Their single most-repeated pattern is RW def → RHS def (6×).

Parma Calcio 1913

The football question
How does Parma Calcio 1913 progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

119build-up passes attempted
71%completed
37%reach the middle third
5%go long into the final third

Pass types

36CB · 43%
15Long Wide · 18%
2Long Central · 2%
28Wide → FB · 33%
3Central · 4%
CB36 · 43%
right: 20 passes, most from Troilo20left: 16 passes, most from Troilo16
Long Wide15 · 18%
left: 10 passes, most from Corvi10right: 5 passes, most from Corvi5
Long Central2 · 2%
Wide → FB28 · 33%
right: 17 passes, most from Delprato17left: 11 passes, most from Corvi11
Central3 · 4%
left: 3 passes, most from Corvi3
◆ Vision AI Insight
Parma Calcio 1913 build predominantly down the right, with Corvi as the fulcrum (26 build-up passes). Only 42% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (10×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Lazio

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 72 progressive passes across 1 match (72.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
18%
Right half-space
6%
Central
14%
Left half-space
7%
Left wing
56%
Progression is left-dominant: 24% right side · 14% central · 62% left.

Who generates it

Nuno Tavares
19 · 26%
Mattia Zaccagni
12 · 17%
Reda Belahyane
8 · 11%
Kenneth Taylor
7 · 10%
Christos Mandas
4 · 6%
Top two — Nuno Tavares & Mattia Zaccagni — account for 43% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
72.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
21% reach final third
21% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 79% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 21% of progressive passes reached the final third and 21% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 43% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacesterile
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient

Parma Calcio 1913

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 39 progressive passes across 1 match (39.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
21%
Right half-space
5%
Central
33%
Left half-space
15%
Left wing
26%
Progression is left-dominant: 26% right side · 33% central · 41% left.

Who generates it

Edoardo Corvi
11 · 28%
Emanuele Valeri
8 · 21%
Mariano Troilo
4 · 10%
Enrico Delprato
3 · 8%
Christian Ordóñez
2 · 5%
Top two — Edoardo Corvi & Emanuele Valeri — account for 49% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
39.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
36% reach final third
15% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 64% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 36% of progressive passes reached the final third and 15% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 49% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacesterile
Centralefficient
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Lazio

The question
Where do Lazio's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

21shots
1.5xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (14%)14%3Settled attack: 15 shots (71%)71%15Set piece: 3 shots (14%)14%321SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 14% of shots310.210.07
Cross100.080.08
Pass into the box / short pass100.070.07
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)110.060.06
Settled attack 71% of shots1501.170.08
Cross400.340.09
Cut-back300.320.11
Pass into the box / short pass400.180.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)400.320.08
Set piece 14% of shots300.140.05
Corner300.140.05

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Mattia Zaccagni70.460
Manuel Lazzari20.210
Fisayo Dele-Bashiru10.120
Gustav Isaksen10.120
Reda Belahyane10.040

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Davide Frattesi30.400
Gustav Isaksen50.340
Mattia Zaccagni30.190
Tijjani Noslin20.140
Nuno Tavares10.120
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Lazio's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.2 of 1.5 xG, 15 of 21 shots), mostly cross. 3 of the 21 shots (14%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 21 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 1.5 xG (-0.5).

Parma Calcio 1913

The question
Where do Parma Calcio 1913's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

10shots
0.7xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 4 shots (40%)40%4Settled attack: 3 shots (30%)30%3Set piece: 3 shots (30%)30%310SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 40% of shots410.350.09
Cross100.080.08
Pass into the box / short pass110.030.03
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.240.12
Settled attack 30% of shots300.240.08
Cross100.050.05
Pass into the box / short pass200.190.09
Set piece 30% of shots300.150.05
Corner300.150.05

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Emanuele Valeri30.170
David Romero10.150
Giovanni Fabbian10.031

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
David Romero20.240
Enrico Delprato20.180
Simone Lontani30.151
El Bilal Touré20.100
Mariano Troilo10.070
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Parma Calcio 1913's chances, by xG, is attacking transition (0.3 of 0.7 xG, 4 of 10 shots), mostly own creation (carry, dribble, rebound). 4 of the 10 shots (40%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 10 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 0.7 xG (+0.3).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Lazio

The question
How does Lazio deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

27 crosses: 12 found a team-mate (44%), 6 led to a shot (22%). 10 cut-backs: 6 found a team-mate (60%), 3 led to a shot (30%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Parma Calcio 1913

The question
How does Parma Calcio 1913 deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

12 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (33%), 4 led to a shot (33%). 2 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (50%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Lazio

The question
Which part of the final third does Lazio actually cross from?

27 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 1 crosses (4%)4%1deep left wing: 2 crosses (7%)7%2advanced right wing: 2 crosses (7%)7%2advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 7 crosses (26%)26%7byline right wing: 5 crosses (19%)19%5byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 1 crosses (4%)4%1byline left wing: 9 crosses (33%)33%9
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing933%1
advanced · left wing726%2
byline · right wing519%1
deep · left wing27%0
advanced · right wing27%1
deep · left half-space14%0
byline · left half-space14%1

Parma Calcio 1913

The question
Which part of the final third does Parma Calcio 1913 actually cross from?

12 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 1 crosses (8%)8%1advanced right half-space: 1 crosses (8%)8%1advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 7 crosses (58%)58%7byline right wing: 0 crosses (0%)byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 3 crosses (25%)25%3
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · left wing758%2
byline · left wing325%1
advanced · right wing18%1
advanced · right half-space18%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+2.11Lazio on-ball value
+1.03Parma Calcio 1913 on-ball value
+0.0+1.1+2.1HALF TIME+2.11+1.030′15′30′45′60′75′90′
LazioParma Calcio 1913Each step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Lazio — where the value came from
Passes701 actions+1.02
Carries155 actions+0.34
Dribbles17 actions+0.07
Shots21 actions+0.37
Ball wins67 actions+0.31
Parma Calcio 1913 — where the value came from
Passes333 actions+0.42
Carries65 actions+0.05
Dribbles10 actions-0.01
Shots10 actions+0.34
Ball wins58 actions+0.23
Lazio — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Nuno Tavares144+0.626
Gustav Isaksen63+0.407
Mattia Zaccagni86+0.376
Davide Frattesi56+0.354
Kenneth Taylor91+0.160
Tijjani Noslin (lowest)43-0.346
Parma Calcio 1913 — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Edoardo Corvi45+0.279
David Romero19+0.213
Simone Lontani19+0.113
Emanuele Valeri47+0.107
Enrico Delprato45+0.088
Adrián Bernabé (lowest)31-0.022
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Lazio

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

6 of 18 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%6/18Mussolini4 of 26 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%4/26Mandas4 of 39 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%4/39Mandas12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 59 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%6/59Mussolini5 of 53 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%5/53Frattesi5 of 67 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%5/67Sutalo7 of 76 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%7/76Taylor15 of 102 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%15/102Tavares7 of 31 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%7/31Mussolini6 of 25 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%6/25Isaksen5 of 25 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%5/25Belahyane13 of 41 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%13/41Tavares19 of 119 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%19/119Tavaresattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
50
Failed forward pass
33
Failed take-on
9
Lost in the defensive third
16
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 33% of 18 pass attempts there are lost (6 times). Separately, 48% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Parma Calcio 1913

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

6 of 20 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%6/20Carlos5 of 24 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%5/24Troilo14 of 47 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%14/47Corvi7 of 21 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%7/21Corvi7 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 of 27 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%8/27Bernabé9 of 25 pass attempts lost here (36%).36%9/25Romero7 of 33 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%7/33Romero6 of 29 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%6/29Touré5 of 26 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%5/26Drobnic14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.5 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 of 30 pass attempts lost here (40%).40%12/30Valeriattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
23
Failed forward pass
16
Failed take-on
7
Lost in the defensive third
35
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the attacking third: 40% of 30 pass attempts there are lost (12 times). Separately, 25% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Lazio

Not just press intensity, but where the 163 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
16%
Middle third
48%
Own third
36%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.2 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 16% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 48% in midfield.

Where they win it back

613251210142018165134DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

Parma Calcio 1913

Not just press intensity, but where the 172 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
10%
Middle third
35%
Own third
55%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 6.2 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 10% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 35% in midfield.

Where they win it back

14174611714161410DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Lazio

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Lazio win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 38 opposition possessions that Lazio ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
2.6passes
median 2 · before Lazio win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
6sec
median 4s · 38.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
61%
32%
8%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.2
12s
15–30′
3.0
6s
30–45+′
2.1
4s
45–60′
1.8
1s
60–75′
2.9
6s
75–90+′
2.7
5s
average passesaverage seconds

Parma Calcio 1913

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Parma Calcio 1913 win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 32 opposition possessions that Parma Calcio 1913 ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
6.9passes
median 5 · before Parma Calcio 1913 win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
20sec
median 14s · 32.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
25%
28%
12%
34%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′

too few
15–30′
6.6
20s
30–45+′
7.8
22s
45–60′

too few
60–75′
5.4
14s
75–90+′
8.3
23s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Lazio — 163 actions, 133 won
Parma Calcio 1913 — 172 actions, 126 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Lazio — 96 wins · 8% in the final third, 48% midfield, 44% own third
own third, right: 9 of 96 wins (9%)9%9 winsown third, centre: 22 of 96 wins (23%)23%22 winsown third, left: 11 of 96 wins (11%)11%11 winsmidfield, right: 13 of 96 wins (14%)14%13 winsmidfield, centre: 20 of 96 wins (21%)21%20 winsmidfield, left: 13 of 96 wins (14%)14%13 winsfinal third, right: 2 of 96 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, centre: 4 of 96 wins (4%)4%4 winsfinal third, left: 2 of 96 wins (2%)2%2 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Nuno Tavaresball-recovery10′77
Davide Frattesiball-recovery50′76
Tijjani Noslinball-recovery2′74
Reda Belahyaneball-recovery59′72
Kenneth Taylorball-recovery0′71
Parma Calcio 1913 — 98 wins · 1% in the final third, 27% midfield, 72% own third
own third, right: 21 of 98 wins (21%)21%21 winsown third, centre: 42 of 98 wins (43%)43%42 winsown third, left: 8 of 98 wins (8%)8%8 winsmidfield, right: 12 of 98 wins (12%)12%12 winsmidfield, centre: 10 of 98 wins (10%)10%10 winsmidfield, left: 4 of 98 wins (4%)4%4 winsfinal third, right: 0 of 98 wins (0%)final third, centre: 0 of 98 wins (0%)final third, left: 1 of 98 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Vincent Sierroball-recovery28′71
Mandela Keitatackle74′66
Mandela Keitaball-recovery91′63
Mandela Keitaball-recovery64′62
Mandela Keitainterception64′60
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Lazio

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Lazio? 39 opponent progressive passes and 10 shots faced (0.7 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Lazio)

Right wing
18%
Right half-space
9%
Central
38%
Left half-space
11%
Left wing
25%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the central (38% of the danger conceded).

Parma Calcio 1913

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Parma Calcio 1913? 72 opponent progressive passes and 21 shots faced (1.5 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Parma Calcio 1913)

Right wing
20%
Right half-space
4%
Central
15%
Left half-space
5%
Left wing
56%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (56% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Lazio

Build-up (own third)

safer, right-sided

right 33% · centre 52% · left 15%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
125
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+11.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
27%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.4 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
72% of 53
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
26%
Progression (middle third)

safer, left-sided, touchline to touchline

right 29% · centre 26% · left 45%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
453
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.4 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
52% of 84
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
46%
Final third

safer, left-sided, kept on the floor

right 22% · centre 13% · left 64%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
295
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
5%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
31% of 59
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
47%

Parma Calcio 1913

Build-up (own third)

safer, attacking the next line, more direct

right 31% · centre 47% · left 21%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
135
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+20.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
12%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
38%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.2 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
49% of 74
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
51%
Progression (middle third)

safer, playing short, circulating

right 32% · centre 32% · left 35%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
176
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
33% of 58
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
64%
Final third

safer, left-sided, longer passing

right 29% · centre 14% · left 57%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
97
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
15%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
24% of 29
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
52%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Lazio
compared with their other 8 matches this season
Progressive passes72vs 44
Field tilt75%vs 54%
Threat from passing8.89vs 5.90
PPDA3.2vs 6.0
Defensive actions163vs 138
Parma Calcio 1913
compared with their other 8 matches this season
Defensive actions172vs 148
Passes333vs 425
Pass accuracy72%vs 79%
Progressive carries27vs 38
Field tilt25%vs 35%

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Lazio

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
17%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
43%
Safe / backward
38%
19% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 81% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Parma Calcio 1913

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
16%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
52%
Safe / backward
32%
17% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 83% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Lazio: 8 corners, 2 led to a shot; Parma Calcio 1913: 3 corners, 2 led to a shot.

Lazio

8Corners
2Led to a shot
6Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.14Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
12%1 corner25%12%1 corner12%1 corner12%25%5 from the left flag3 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Parma Calcio 1913

3Corners
2Led to a shot
1Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.15Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
33%33%33%1 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Lazio
Parma Calcio 1913

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report