Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportPremier League 2026-09-05

Hull City v Aston Villa

0.521.37expected goals
0.370.36xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (0.52 – 1.37 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Hull City
Aston Villa
Possession (share of passes)
26.7%73.3%
Duels
5446
Duels won
42.6%34.8%
Aerial duels
3030
Aerial duels won
1713
Successful dribbles
98
Passes
266730
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Hull City above the line, Aston Villa below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.531.051.58Nicolas Jackson — miss, 0.25 xGNobel Mendy — save, 0.00 xGGeorge Hemmings — save, 0.07 xGRoss Barkley — save, 0.05 xGNicolas Jackson — save, 0.04 xGNobel Mendy — miss, 0.03 xGRoss Barkley — miss, 0.10 xGTyrone Mings — miss, 0.03 xGRegan Slater — miss, 0.03 xGMohamed Belloumi — save, 0.04 xGRegan Slater — save, 0.04 xGEmiliano Buendía — miss, 0.03 xGRoss Barkley — save, 0.03 xGOliver McBurnie — miss, 0.06 xGJohn McGinn — miss, 0.43 xGElliot Stroud — miss, 0.05 xGEmiliano Buendía — miss, 0.16 xGMohamed Belloumi — post, 0.02 xGOliver McBurnie — miss, 0.08 xGTyrone Mings — save, 0.07 xGRoss Barkley — miss, 0.05 xGTyrone Mings — save, 0.07 xGMohamed-Ali Cho — save, 0.07 xGOliver McBurnie — miss, 0.11 xG0.521.37Nobel Mendy — save, 0.04 xGOTGeorge Hemmings — save, 0.07 xGOTRoss Barkley — save, 0.13 xGOTNicolas Jackson — save, 0.05 xGOTMohamed Belloumi — save, 0.09 xGOTRegan Slater — save, 0.20 xGOTRoss Barkley — save, 0.04 xGOTTyrone Mings — save, 0.03 xGOTTyrone Mings — save, 0.03 xGOTMohamed-Ali Cho — save, 0.04 xGOT0.370.360'15'30'45'60'75'90'
Hull CityAston Villasolid = xG24 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Hull City
Aston Villa
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Hull City

The question
When Hull City has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Hull City's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 30.3% of the time on the ball30%Progression: 41.1% of the time on the ball41%Chance creation: 26.4% of the time on the ball26%Attacking transition: 2.3% of the time on the ball41%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up30.3%
Progression41.1%
Chance creation26.4%
Attacking transition2.3%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Hull City spends most of its time on the ball (41% of its time on the ball).

Aston Villa

The question
When Aston Villa has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Aston Villa's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 25.3% of the time on the ball25%Progression: 51.3% of the time on the ball51%Chance creation: 21.5% of the time on the ball22%Attacking transition: 1.9% of the time on the ball51%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up25.3%
Progression51.3%
Chance creation21.5%
Attacking transition1.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Aston Villa spends most of its time on the ball (51% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Hull City
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Aston Villa
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Hull City — 380 touches
Aston Villa — 857 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Hull City

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Hull City actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
266
ACTIONS
3%5%15%6%5%7%6%6%8%11%6%3%2%4%14%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
71
ACTIONS
3%6%6%7%6%10%13%6%13%11%4%4%1%11%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (13.4% of all actions). 55% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 45% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 32% defensive, 41% middle, 27% attacking.

Aston Villa

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Aston Villa actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
730
ACTIONS
4%4%9%3%6%14%16%10%6%6%5%4%5%7%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
221
ACTIONS
4%6%8%6%1%8%12%19%13%7%4%3%3%2%3%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (16.7% of all actions). 71% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 29% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 22% defensive, 53% middle, 25% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Hull City
55%Left side16%Middle29%Right sideATTACKING →
L
55%16%29%
R
Aston Villa
33%Left side32%Middle35%Right sideATTACKING →
L
33%32%35%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Hull City — 27 entries, 52% through the left wing
Left wing: 14 entries (52%)1452%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 3 entries (11%)311%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 2 entries (7%)27%CENTRERight half-space: 1 entries (4%)14%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 7 entries (26%)726%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Aston Villa — 69 entries, 23% through the left wing
Left wing: 16 entries (23%)1623%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 8 entries (12%)812%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 15 entries (22%)1522%CENTRERight half-space: 14 entries (20%)1420%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 16 entries (23%)1623%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Hull City

The football question
How does Hull City progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

90build-up passes attempted
67%completed
28%reach the middle third
5%go long into the final third

Pass types

24CB · 40%
17Long Wide · 28%
14Wide → FB · 23%
5Central · 8%
CB24 · 40%
left: 15 passes, most from Mendy15right: 9 passes, most from Ajayi9
Long Wide17 · 28%
left: 14 passes, most from Tzolakis14right: 3 passes, most from Tzolakis3
Wide → FB14 · 23%
left: 10 passes, most from Tzolakis10right: 4 passes, most from Tzolakis4
Central5 · 8%
right: 4 passes, most from Coyle4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Hull City build predominantly down the left, with Tzolakis as the fulcrum (22 build-up passes). Only 33% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → C def (4×).

Aston Villa

The football question
How does Aston Villa progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

149build-up passes attempted
87%completed
22%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

53CB · 41%
11Long Wide · 9%
1Long Central · 1%
43Wide → FB · 33%
21Central · 16%
CB53 · 41%
left: 30 passes, most from Lindelöf30right: 23 passes, most from Lindelöf23
Long Wide11 · 9%
left: 7 passes, most from Suzuki7right: 4 passes, most from Suzuki4
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB43 · 33%
right: 29 passes, most from Suzuki29left: 14 passes, most from Suzuki14
Central21 · 16%
right: 11 passes, most from Kamara11left: 10 passes, most from Suzuki10
◆ Vision AI Insight
Aston Villa build predominantly down the right, with Suzuki as the fulcrum (43 build-up passes). Only 22% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → C def (12×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Hull City

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 28 progressive passes across 1 match (28.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
11%
Right half-space
11%
Central
21%
Left half-space
11%
Left wing
46%
Progression is left-dominant: 21% right side · 21% central · 57% left.

Who generates it

Konstantinos Tzolakis
9 · 32%
Ryan Giles
5 · 18%
Semi Ajayi
2 · 7%
Lucas Gourna-Douath
2 · 7%
Sorba Thomas
2 · 7%
Top two — Konstantinos Tzolakis & Ryan Giles — account for 50% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
28.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
21% reach final third
18% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 79% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 21% of progressive passes reached the final third and 18% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 50% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacesterile
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient

Aston Villa

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 57 progressive passes across 1 match (57.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
23%
Right half-space
19%
Central
19%
Left half-space
18%
Left wing
21%
Progression is right-dominant: 42% right side · 19% central · 39% left.

Who generates it

Tyrone Mings
7 · 12%
John McGinn
6 · 11%
Victor Lindelöf
6 · 11%
Zion Suzuki
6 · 11%
Ian Maatsen
5 · 9%
Top two — Tyrone Mings & John McGinn — account for 23% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
57.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
30% reach final third
14% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 70% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 30% of progressive passes reached the final third and 14% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 23% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spaceefficient
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Hull City

The question
Where do Hull City's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

11shots
0.5xG
0.05xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Attacking transition: 5 shots (45%)45%5Settled attack: 5 shots (45%)45%5Set piece: 1 shots (9%)9%111SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 45% of shots500.210.04
Pass into the box / short pass400.210.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.000.00
Settled attack 45% of shots500.300.06
Cross200.190.09
Pass into the box / short pass200.080.04
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.030.03
Set piece 9% of shots100.020.02
Corner100.020.02

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Ryan Giles20.150
Lucas Gourna-Douath20.090
Sorba Thomas10.080
Oliver McBurnie10.070
Elliot Stroud10.060

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Oliver McBurnie30.250
Regan Slater20.070
Mohamed-Ali Cho10.070
Mohamed Belloumi20.060
Elliot Stroud10.050
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Hull City's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.3 of 0.5 xG, 5 of 11 shots), mostly cross. 5 of the 11 shots (45%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 1 of the 11 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 0.5 xG (-0.5).

Aston Villa

The question
Where do Aston Villa's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

13shots
1.4xG
0.11xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Attacking transition: 2 shots (15%)15%2Settled attack: 7 shots (54%)54%7Set piece: 4 shots (31%)31%413SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 15% of shots200.680.34
Pass into the box / short pass200.680.34
Settled attack 54% of shots700.510.07
Cut-back200.230.12
Pass into the box / short pass400.180.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.100.10
Set piece 31% of shots400.180.04
Corner300.150.05
Free kick100.030.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Nicolas Jackson10.430
Ian Maatsen10.250
George Hemmings10.160
Ross Barkley20.120
Victor Lindelöf20.100

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
John McGinn10.430
Nicolas Jackson20.290
Ross Barkley40.230
Emiliano Buendía20.190
Tyrone Mings30.160
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Aston Villa's chances, by xG, is attacking transition (0.7 of 1.4 xG, 2 of 13 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 2 of the 13 shots (15%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 4 of the 13 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 1.4 xG (-1.4).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Hull City

The question
How does Hull City deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

18 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (28%), 2 led to a shot (11%). 2 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Aston Villa

The question
How does Aston Villa deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

17 crosses: 3 found a team-mate (18%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 4 cut-backs: 4 found a team-mate (100%), 2 led to a shot (50%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Hull City

The question
Which part of the final third does Hull City actually cross from?

18 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (6%)6%1advanced right wing: 4 crosses (22%)22%4advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 4 crosses (22%)22%4byline right wing: 2 crosses (11%)11%2byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 7 crosses (39%)39%7
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing739%1
advanced · right wing422%0
advanced · left wing422%1
byline · right wing211%0
deep · left wing16%0

Aston Villa

The question
Which part of the final third does Aston Villa actually cross from?

17 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (6%)6%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 6 crosses (35%)35%6advanced right half-space: 1 crosses (6%)6%1advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (12%)12%2byline right wing: 5 crosses (29%)29%5byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 2 crosses (12%)12%2
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing635%0
byline · right wing529%0
advanced · left wing212%0
byline · left wing212%0
deep · right wing16%0
advanced · right half-space16%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+0.95Hull City on-ball value
+1.03Aston Villa on-ball value
+0.0+0.6+1.2HALF TIME+0.95+1.030′15′30′45′60′75′90′
Hull CityAston VillaEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Hull City — where the value came from
Passes266 actions+0.35
Carries71 actions+0.04
Dribbles15 actions+0.04
Shots11 actions+0.39
Ball wins51 actions+0.14
Aston Villa — where the value came from
Passes730 actions+0.72
Carries221 actions+0.03
Dribbles18 actions-0.01
Shots13 actions+0.15
Ball wins38 actions+0.13
Hull City — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Nobel Mendy43+0.242
Mohamed Belloumi36+0.169
Ryan Giles45+0.103
Konstantinos Tzolakis45+0.099
Semi Ajayi42+0.069
Brooke Norton-Cuffy (lowest)11-0.003
Aston Villa — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Victor Lindelöf168+0.398
Ross Barkley140+0.362
Ian Maatsen62+0.198
Emiliano Buendía46+0.122
Boubacar Kamara130+0.111
John McGinn (lowest)49-0.178
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Hull City

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.14 of 41 pass attempts lost here (34%).34%14/41Tzolakis5 of 16 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%5/16Gourna-Dou13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.5 of 19 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%5/19Belloumi3 of 17 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%3/17Slater1 of 16 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%1/16Gourna-Dou8 of 20 pass attempts lost here (40%).40%8/20Egan9 of 28 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%9/28Mendy8 of 17 pass attempts lost here (47%).47%8/17Belloumi7 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.5 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.17 of 36 pass attempts lost here (47%).47%17/36Gilesattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
31
Failed forward pass
22
Failed take-on
6
Lost in the defensive third
30
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the attacking third: 47% of 36 pass attempts there are lost (17 times). Separately, 36% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Aston Villa

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

9 of 27 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%9/27Cash2 of 29 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%2/29Cash5 of 67 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%5/67Suzuki1 of 20 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%1/20Buendía6 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.7 of 42 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%7/42Cash5 of 100 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%5/100Buendía15 of 118 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%15/118Kamara3 of 76 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%3/76Mings4 of 41 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%4/41Barkley12 of 45 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%12/45McGinn9 of 39 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%9/39Cash2 of 32 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%2/32Buendía3 of 37 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%3/37Barkley8 of 51 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%8/51Maatsenattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
34
Failed forward pass
28
Failed take-on
10
Lost in the defensive third
20
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 33% of 27 pass attempts there are lost (9 times). Separately, 39% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Hull City

Not just press intensity, but where the 140 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
17%
Middle third
33%
Own third
50%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 7.3 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 17% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 33% in midfield.

Where they win it back

8122317105891014568DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

Aston Villa

Not just press intensity, but where the 119 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
15%
Middle third
34%
Own third
50%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.9 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 15% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 34% in midfield.

Where they win it back

101019147131055858DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Hull City

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Hull City win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 21 opposition possessions that Hull City ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
8.0passes
median 6 · before Hull City win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
27sec
median 12s · 21.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
19%
29%
33%
19%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
5.4
24s
15–30′
4.3
10s
30–45+′

too few
45–60′
15.0
50s
60–75′
12.3
44s
75–90+′
7.3
24s
average passesaverage seconds

Aston Villa

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Aston Villa win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 21 opposition possessions that Aston Villa ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
2.4passes
median 2 · before Aston Villa win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
7sec
median 4s · 21.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
71%
14%
14%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.2
10s
15–30′

too few
30–45+′

too few
45–60′
2.4
6s
60–75′
3.0
13s
75–90+′
1.8
6s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Hull City — 140 actions, 99 won
Aston Villa — 119 actions, 84 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Hull City — 68 wins · 10% in the final third, 28% midfield, 62% own third
own third, right: 11 of 68 wins (16%)16%11 winsown third, centre: 18 of 68 wins (26%)26%18 winsown third, left: 13 of 68 wins (19%)19%13 winsmidfield, right: 4 of 68 wins (6%)6%4 winsmidfield, centre: 6 of 68 wins (9%)9%6 winsmidfield, left: 9 of 68 wins (13%)13%9 winsfinal third, right: 2 of 68 wins (3%)3%2 winsfinal third, centre: 0 of 68 wins (0%)final third, left: 5 of 68 wins (7%)7%5 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Lucas Gourna-Douathball-recovery52′75
Mohamed Belloumiball-recovery10′71
Ryan Gilesball-recovery4′69
Nobel Mendytackle52′68
Ryan Gilesball-recovery91′68
Aston Villa — 58 wins · 3% in the final third, 31% midfield, 66% own third
own third, right: 9 of 58 wins (16%)16%9 winsown third, centre: 18 of 58 wins (31%)31%18 winsown third, left: 11 of 58 wins (19%)19%11 winsmidfield, right: 7 of 58 wins (12%)12%7 winsmidfield, centre: 4 of 58 wins (7%)7%4 winsmidfield, left: 7 of 58 wins (12%)12%7 winsfinal third, right: 0 of 58 wins (0%)final third, centre: 1 of 58 wins (2%)2%1 winfinal third, left: 1 of 58 wins (2%)2%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Boubacar Kamaraball-recovery15′70
Boubacar Kamaraball-recovery38′67
Alyssonball-recovery94′66
Boubacar Kamarainterception15′64
Boubacar Kamaraball-recovery1′61
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Hull City

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Hull City? 57 opponent progressive passes and 13 shots faced (1.4 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Hull City)

Right wing
23%
Right half-space
24%
Central
22%
Left half-space
19%
Left wing
12%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right half-space (24% of the danger conceded).

Aston Villa

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Aston Villa? 28 opponent progressive passes and 11 shots faced (0.5 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Aston Villa)

Right wing
14%
Right half-space
6%
Central
23%
Left half-space
12%
Left wing
45%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (45% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Hull City

Build-up (own third)

safer, longer passing, more direct

right 18% · centre 53% · left 29%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
112
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+18.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
40%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
45% of 55
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
51%
Progression (middle third)

longer passing, safer, trying to break lines

right 37% · centre 19% · left 44%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
141
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
27%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
21%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
48% of 46
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
52%
Final third

safer, less recycling, left-sided

right 29% · centre 11% · left 60%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
99
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
17%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.1 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
27% of 37
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
54%

Aston Villa

Build-up (own third)

safer, right-sided, narrow, central

right 36% · centre 47% · left 16%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
207
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+8.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
27%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
15%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
69% of 55
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
35%
Progression (middle third)

safer, played inside, narrow, central

right 33% · centre 42% · left 26%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
513
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
26%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
5%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.4 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
47% of 66
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
50%
Final third

safer, kept on the floor, narrow, central

right 38% · centre 23% · left 39%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
249
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
-0.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
3%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.4 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
22% of 41
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
59%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Hull City
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Defensive actions140vs 158
Expected goals0.52vs 1.12
Passes266vs 327
PPDA7.3vs 6.4
Progressive passes28vs 33
Aston Villa
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Progressive carries102vs 34
Passes730vs 382
Final-third entries69vs 31
Pass accuracy88%vs 79%
Progressive passes57vs 33

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Hull City

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
16%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
53%
Safe / backward
30%
17% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 83% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Aston Villa

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
12%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
46%
Safe / backward
41%
13% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 87% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Hull City: 3 corners, 1 led to a shot; Aston Villa: 4 corners, 2 led to a shot.

Hull City

3Corners
1Led to a shot
0Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.02Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
33%1 corner67%2 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Aston Villa

4Corners
2Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
4Set-piece shots
0.18Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
25%1 corner25%25%1 corner25%2 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Hull City
Aston Villa

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report