Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportPremier League 2026-10-10

Chelsea v Bournemouth

0.811.70expected goals
1.151.67xG on target (xGOT)

Chelsea won the match; Bournemouth won the chances (0.81 – 1.70 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Chelsea
Bournemouth
Possession (share of passes)
50.0%50.0%
Duels
5052
Duels won
50.0%42.3%
Aerial duels
2727
Aerial duels won
1512
Successful dribbles
75
Passes
506507
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Chelsea above the line, Bournemouth below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.651.301.95Jordan Henderson — goal, 0.05 xGPedro Neto — save, 0.09 xGMorgan Rogers — goal, 0.06 xGRayan — miss, 0.06 xGPedro Neto — save, 0.08 xGJordan Henderson — miss, 0.04 xGMorgan Rogers — save, 0.07 xGRayan — save, 0.25 xGRyan Christie — save, 0.03 xGMoisés Caicedo — miss, 0.04 xGAntónio Silva — save, 0.07 xGJoão Pedro — goal, 0.10 xGAntónio Silva — save, 0.45 xGEvanilson — goal, 0.70 xGEvanilson — miss, 0.05 xGJoão Pedro — goal, 0.24 xGJordan Henderson — goal, 0.02 xGEvanilson — miss, 0.06 xGÁlvaro Rodríguez — save, 0.05 xG0.811.70Jordan Henderson — goal, 0.21 xGOTPedro Neto — save, 0.05 xGOTMorgan Rogers — goal, 0.27 xGOTPedro Neto — save, 0.03 xGOTMorgan Rogers — save, 0.04 xGOTRayan — save, 0.16 xGOTRyan Christie — save, 0.02 xGOTAntónio Silva — save, 0.29 xGOTJoão Pedro — goal, 0.10 xGOTAntónio Silva — save, 0.43 xGOTEvanilson — goal, 0.68 xGOTJoão Pedro — goal, 0.24 xGOTJordan Henderson — goal, 0.21 xGOTÁlvaro Rodríguez — save, 0.09 xGOT1.151.670'15'30'45'60'75'90'
ChelseaBournemouthsolid = xG19 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Chelsea
Bournemouth

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Chelsea or Bournemouth got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 6 of 6 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Chelsea

The question
When Chelsea has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Chelsea's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 36.6% of the time on the ball37%Progression: 51.3% of the time on the ball51%Chance creation: 8.5% of the time on the ball9%Attacking transition: 3.6% of the time on the ball4%51%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up36.6%
Progression51.3%
Chance creation8.5%
Attacking transition3.6%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Chelsea spends most of its time on the ball (51% of its time on the ball).

Bournemouth

The question
When Bournemouth has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Bournemouth's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 27.7% of the time on the ball28%Progression: 47.1% of the time on the ball47%Chance creation: 21.5% of the time on the ball22%Attacking transition: 3.7% of the time on the ball4%47%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up27.7%
Progression47.1%
Chance creation21.5%
Attacking transition3.7%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Bournemouth spends most of its time on the ball (47% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Chelsea
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Bournemouth
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Chelsea — 657 touches
Bournemouth — 629 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Chelsea

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Chelsea actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
506
ACTIONS
5%4%15%8%5%11%8%11%11%10%4%2%2%3%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
96
ACTIONS
4%6%16%8%6%10%6%6%12%12%3%1%3%4%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (14.8% of all actions). 62% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 38% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 38% defensive, 50% middle, 12% attacking.

Bournemouth

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Bournemouth actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
507
ACTIONS
4%7%8%5%3%5%11%9%16%8%4%4%2%5%9%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
126
ACTIONS
13%8%8%6%15%10%11%10%2%3%2%9%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left half-space of the middle third (15.3% of all actions). 67% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 33% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 27% defensive, 51% middle, 22% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Chelsea
36%Left side23%Middle41%Right sideATTACKING →
L
36%23%41%
R
Bournemouth
45%Left side26%Middle29%Right sideATTACKING →
L
45%26%29%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Chelsea — 21 entries, 43% through the left wing
Left wing: 9 entries (43%)943%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 4 entries (19%)419%LEFT HALF-SPACE00%CENTRERight half-space: 1 entries (5%)15%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 7 entries (33%)733%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Bournemouth — 55 entries, 36% through the left wing
Left wing: 20 entries (36%)2036%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 14 entries (25%)1425%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 1 entries (2%)12%CENTRERight half-space: 9 entries (16%)916%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 11 entries (20%)1120%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Chelsea

The football question
How does Chelsea progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

190build-up passes attempted
80%completed
25%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

78CB · 51%
5Long Wide · 3%
53Wide → FB · 35%
16Central · 11%
CB78 · 51%
left: 43 passes, most from Colwill43right: 35 passes, most from Acheampong35
Long Wide5 · 3%
right: 3 passes, most from Martínez3left: 2 passes, most from Chavarría2
Wide → FB53 · 35%
left: 30 passes, most from Martínez30right: 23 passes, most from Martínez23
Central16 · 11%
left: 10 passes, most from Martínez10right: 6 passes, most from Martínez6
◆ Vision AI Insight
Chelsea build predominantly down the left, with Colwill as the fulcrum (37 build-up passes). Only 26% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (15×).

Bournemouth

The football question
How does Bournemouth progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

135build-up passes attempted
77%completed
24%reach the middle third
3%go long into the final third

Pass types

48CB · 46%
8Long Wide · 8%
40Wide → FB · 38%
8Central · 8%
CB48 · 46%
right: 35 passes, most from Hill35left: 13 passes, most from Hill13
Long Wide8 · 8%
right: 6 passes, most from Petrovic6left: 2 passes, most from Petrovic2
Wide → FB40 · 38%
right: 22 passes, most from Petrovic22left: 18 passes, most from Truffert18
Central8 · 8%
left: 4 passes, most from Petrovic4right: 4 passes, most from Smith4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Bournemouth build predominantly down the right, with Petrovic as the fulcrum (24 build-up passes). Only 27% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (13×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Chelsea

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 29 progressive passes across 1 match (29.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
31%
Right half-space
0%
Central
17%
Left half-space
7%
Left wing
45%
Progression is left-dominant: 31% right side · 17% central · 52% left.

Who generates it

Pep Chavarría
10 · 34%
Josh Acheampong
4 · 14%
Emiliano Martínez
4 · 14%
Cole Palmer
2 · 7%
Maxence Lacroix
2 · 7%
Top two — Pep Chavarría & Josh Acheampong — account for 48% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
29.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
24% reach final third
17% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 76% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 24% of progressive passes reached the final third and 17% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 48% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient

Bournemouth

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 72 progressive passes across 1 match (72.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
12%
Right half-space
17%
Central
12%
Left half-space
25%
Left wing
33%
Progression is left-dominant: 29% right side · 12% central · 58% left.

Who generates it

Adrien Truffert
14 · 19%
António Silva
9 · 12%
James Hill
8 · 11%
Marcus Tavernier
8 · 11%
Ryan Christie
6 · 8%
Top two — Adrien Truffert & António Silva — account for 32% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
72.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
29% reach final third
19% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 71% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 29% of progressive passes reached the final third and 19% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 32% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingsterile
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spaceefficient
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Chelsea

The question
Where do Chelsea's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

10shots
0.8xG
0.08xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
5goals
Attacking transition: 5 shots (50%)50%5Settled attack: 4 shots (40%)40%4Set piece: 1 shots (10%)10%110SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 50% of shots520.370.07
Cut-back110.100.10
Pass into the box / short pass210.150.07
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.130.06
Settled attack 40% of shots420.410.10
Cross210.280.14
Pass into the box / short pass110.050.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.070.07
Set piece 10% of shots110.020.02
Free kick110.020.02

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Pep Chavarría10.241
Cole Palmer20.141
Pedro Neto10.101
Jordan Henderson20.101

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
João Pedro20.342
Pedro Neto20.170
Morgan Rogers20.131
Jordan Henderson30.122
Moisés Caicedo10.040
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Chelsea's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.4 of 0.8 xG, 4 of 10 shots), mostly cross. 5 of the 10 shots (50%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 1 of the 10 shots came from set pieces; 5 goals from 0.8 xG (+4.2).

Bournemouth

The question
Where do Bournemouth's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

9shots
1.7xG
0.19xG per shot
2big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 2 shots (22%)22%2Settled attack: 4 shots (44%)44%4Set piece: 3 shots (33%)33%39SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 22% of shots200.110.05
Cross100.060.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.050.05
Settled attack 44% of shots400.380.09
Cross300.330.11
Pass into the box / short pass100.050.05
Set piece 33% of shots311.210.40
Corner311.210.40

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Adrien Truffert20.270
Ben Gannon-Doak20.100
Marcus Tavernier10.060

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Evanilson30.811
António Silva20.510
Rayan20.300
Álvaro Rodríguez10.050
Ryan Christie10.030
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Bournemouth's chances, by xG, is set piece (1.2 of 1.7 xG, 3 of 9 shots), mostly corner. 2 of the 9 shots (22%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 9 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 1.7 xG (-0.7).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Chelsea

The question
How does Chelsea deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

8 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (50%), 2 led to a shot (25%). 3 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (67%), 1 led to a shot (33%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Bournemouth

The question
How does Bournemouth deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

18 crosses: 6 found a team-mate (33%), 4 led to a shot (22%). 3 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (33%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Chelsea

The question
Which part of the final third does Chelsea actually cross from?

8 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 2 crosses (25%)25%2advanced right half-space: 1 crosses (12%)12%1advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 0 crosses (0%)byline right wing: 1 crosses (12%)12%1byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 1 crosses (12%)12%1byline left wing: 3 crosses (38%)38%3
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing338%1
advanced · right wing225%1
advanced · right half-space112%0
byline · right wing112%0
byline · left half-space112%0

Bournemouth

The question
Which part of the final third does Bournemouth actually cross from?

18 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 2 crosses (11%)11%2advanced right wing: 1 crosses (6%)6%1advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 1 crosses (6%)6%1advanced left wing: 5 crosses (28%)28%5byline right wing: 3 crosses (17%)17%3byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 6 crosses (33%)33%6
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing633%2
advanced · left wing528%0
byline · right wing317%0
deep · left wing211%2
advanced · right wing16%0
advanced · left half-space16%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+1.22Chelsea on-ball value
+1.35Bournemouth on-ball value
+0.0+0.7+1.4HALF TIME+1.22+1.350′15′30′45′60′75′90′
ChelseaBournemouthEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Chelsea — where the value came from
Passes506 actions+0.63
Carries96 actions-0.21
Dribbles19 actions-0.02
Shots10 actions+0.41
Ball wins60 actions+0.42
Bournemouth — where the value came from
Passes507 actions+0.76
Carries126 actions+0.12
Dribbles11 actions+0.06
Shots9 actions+0.18
Ball wins73 actions+0.23
Chelsea — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Pedro Neto43+0.359
Morgan Rogers47+0.257
João Pedro29+0.230
Pep Chavarría68+0.227
Emiliano Martínez53+0.179
Jordan Henderson (lowest)81-0.136
Bournemouth — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Ryan Christie56+0.558
António Silva101+0.147
Evanilson51+0.127
Adrien Truffert71+0.113
Juanlu Sánchez21+0.083
Lewis Cook (lowest)19-0.036
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Chelsea

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

9 of 27 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%9/27Acheampong4 of 22 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%4/22Martínez15 of 74 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%15/74Martínez3 of 42 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%3/42Lacroix7 of 25 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%7/25Chavarría10 of 55 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%10/55Acheampong7 of 41 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%7/41Welbeck5 of 56 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%5/56Henderson3 of 55 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%3/55Palestra11 of 50 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%11/50Chavarría4 of 18 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%4/18Acheampong10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 16 pass attempts lost here (38%).38%6/16Palestraattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
18
Failed forward pass
11
Failed take-on
12
Lost in the defensive third
38
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the attacking third: 38% of 16 pass attempts there are lost (6 times). Separately, 20% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Bournemouth

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

11 of 21 pass attempts lost here (52%).52%11/21Hill10 of 36 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%10/36Petrovic3 of 39 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%3/39Adams2 of 23 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%2/23Hill5 of 16 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%5/16Truffert6 of 26 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%6/26Silva4 of 56 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%4/56Christie6 of 48 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%6/48Hill10 of 83 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%10/83Christie7 of 43 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%7/43Christie5 of 18 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%5/18Tavernier3 of 20 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%3/20Gannon-Doa8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 of 24 pass attempts lost here (38%).38%9/24Gannon-Doa17 of 46 pass attempts lost here (37%).37%17/46Gannon-Doaattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
36
Failed forward pass
24
Failed take-on
6
Lost in the defensive third
31
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 52% of 21 pass attempts there are lost (11 times). Separately, 36% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Chelsea

Not just press intensity, but where the 158 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
11%
Middle third
42%
Own third
46%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.9 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 11% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 42% in midfield.

Where they win it back

12132991015151211146DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

Bournemouth

Not just press intensity, but where the 153 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
14%
Middle third
52%
Own third
34%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 5.3 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 14% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 52% in midfield.

Where they win it back

96121213121972319456DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Chelsea

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Chelsea win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 34 opposition possessions that Chelsea ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.8passes
median 3 · before Chelsea win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
13sec
median 6s · 34.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
47%
12%
26%
15%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
2.3
6s
15–30′
6.1
16s
30–45+′
2.8
7s
45–60′
5.0
16s
60–75′
8.2
23s
75–90+′
4.8
11s
average passesaverage seconds

Bournemouth

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Bournemouth win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 43 opposition possessions that Bournemouth ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.7passes
median 4 · before Bournemouth win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
15sec
median 7s · 43.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
40%
26%
12%
23%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
5.6
12s
15–30′
10.8
32s
30–45+′
8.5
21s
45–60′
7.0
22s
60–75′
2.4
3s
75–90+′
2.6
7s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Chelsea — 158 actions, 126 won
Bournemouth — 153 actions, 108 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Chelsea — 91 wins · 9% in the final third, 33% midfield, 58% own third
own third, right: 15 of 91 wins (16%)16%15 winsown third, centre: 27 of 91 wins (30%)30%27 winsown third, left: 11 of 91 wins (12%)12%11 winsmidfield, right: 11 of 91 wins (12%)12%11 winsmidfield, centre: 9 of 91 wins (10%)10%9 winsmidfield, left: 10 of 91 wins (11%)11%10 winsfinal third, right: 3 of 91 wins (3%)3%3 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 91 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 4 of 91 wins (4%)4%4 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Morgan Rogersball-recovery2′86
Moisés Caicedotackle2′85
Pep Chavarríainterception76′84
Jordan Hendersonball-recovery27′75
Marco Palestraball-recovery96′72
Bournemouth — 87 wins · 5% in the final third, 49% midfield, 46% own third
own third, right: 9 of 87 wins (10%)10%9 winsown third, centre: 14 of 87 wins (16%)16%14 winsown third, left: 17 of 87 wins (20%)20%17 winsmidfield, right: 13 of 87 wins (15%)15%13 winsmidfield, centre: 8 of 87 wins (9%)9%8 winsmidfield, left: 22 of 87 wins (25%)25%22 winsfinal third, right: 0 of 87 wins (0%)final third, centre: 2 of 87 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, left: 2 of 87 wins (2%)2%2 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Álvaro Rodríguezball-recovery90′79
Ben Gannon-Doakball-recovery59′76
Evanilsonball-recovery62′74
Marcus Tavernierball-recovery5′69
Adrien Trufferttackle5′65
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Chelsea

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Chelsea? 72 opponent progressive passes and 9 shots faced (1.7 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Chelsea)

Right wing
6%
Right half-space
19%
Central
15%
Left half-space
24%
Left wing
35%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (35% of the danger conceded).

Bournemouth

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Bournemouth? 29 opponent progressive passes and 10 shots faced (0.8 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Bournemouth)

Right wing
30%
Right half-space
0%
Central
17%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
43%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (43% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Chelsea

Build-up (own third)

safer

right 22% · centre 47% · left 31%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
230
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+10.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
17%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
50% of 70
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
47%
Progression (middle third)

safer, circulating, more recycling

right 35% · centre 28% · left 37%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
313
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
38% of 66
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
59%
Final third

safer, circulating, more recycling

right 46% · centre 13% · left 41%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
78
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
-0.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
12%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.2 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
27% of 30
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
53%

Bournemouth

Build-up (own third)

safer, right-sided

right 34% · centre 45% · left 22%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
176
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+10.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
22%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
20%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
55% of 56
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
52%
Progression (middle third)

safer, longer passing, slower

right 29% · centre 29% · left 41%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
328
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
48% of 81
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
52%
Final third

safer, slower, left-sided

right 29% · centre 14% · left 57%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
140
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
-0.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
14% of 44
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
43%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Chelsea
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Final-third entries21vs 40
Progressive passes29vs 42
Threat from passing3.52vs 5.31
Pass accuracy82%vs 78%
Field tilt39%vs 48%
Bournemouth
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Defensive actions153vs 182
Progressive carries53vs 42
Progressive passes72vs 54
Pass accuracy80%vs 77%
Field tilt61%vs 49%

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Chelsea

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
9%
Progressive
0%
Neutral / sideways
52%
Safe / backward
38%
10% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 90% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Bournemouth

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
18%
Progressive
3%
Neutral / sideways
41%
Safe / backward
38%
20% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 80% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Chelsea: 1 corner, 0 led to a shot, 1 set-piece goal; Bournemouth: 7 corners, 2 led to a shot, 1 set-piece goal.

Chelsea

1Corners
0Led to a shot
5Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.02Set-piece xG
1Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
100%0 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Bournemouth

7Corners
2Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
1.21Set-piece xG
1Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
14%1 corner14%1 corner14%29%29%5 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Chelsea
Bournemouth

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report