Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportPremier League 2026-09-12

Crystal Palace v Ipswich

0.701.62expected goals
0.462.38xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (0.70 – 1.62 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Crystal Palace
Ipswich
Possession (share of passes)
46.7%53.3%
Duels
5043
Duels won
46.0%46.5%
Aerial duels
2626
Aerial duels won
1115
Successful dribbles
56
Passes
432494
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Crystal Palace above the line, Ipswich below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.911.822.73Adam Wharton — miss, 0.03 xGAnan Khalaili — miss, 0.06 xGAnan Khalaili — goal, 0.05 xGJørgen Strand Larsen — save, 0.05 xGJørgen Strand Larsen — save, 0.04 xGEmersonn — goal, 0.16 xGJulio Enciso — miss, 0.04 xGEmersonn — miss, 0.17 xGLeif Davis — goal, 0.20 xGEmersonn — miss, 0.07 xGJack Clarke — save, 0.16 xGJulio Enciso — save, 0.06 xGQuinten Timber — miss, 0.05 xGAnan Khalaili — miss, 0.04 xGQuinten Timber — save, 0.08 xGJørgen Strand Larsen — goal, 0.08 xGAnan Khalaili — miss, 0.11 xGJaden Philogene — save, 0.03 xGZian Flemming — miss, 0.12 xGBen Chilwell — miss, 0.10 xGLeif Davis — post, 0.06 xGZian Flemming — goal, 0.47 xGZian Flemming — save, 0.06 xG0.701.62Anan Khalaili — goal, 0.14 xGOTJørgen Strand Larsen — save, 0.10 xGOTJørgen Strand Larsen — save, 0.05 xGOTEmersonn — goal, 0.23 xGOTLeif Davis — goal, 0.44 xGOTJack Clarke — save, 0.56 xGOTJulio Enciso — save, 0.16 xGOTQuinten Timber — save, 0.05 xGOTJørgen Strand Larsen — goal, 0.14 xGOTJaden Philogene — save, 0.03 xGOTZian Flemming — goal, 0.68 xGOTZian Flemming — save, 0.27 xGOT0.462.380'15'30'45'60'75'90'
Crystal PalaceIpswichsolid = xG23 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Crystal Palace
Ipswich

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Crystal Palace or Ipswich got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 5 of 5 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Crystal Palace

The question
When Crystal Palace has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Crystal Palace's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 22.8% of the time on the ball23%Progression: 54.9% of the time on the ball55%Chance creation: 19.8% of the time on the ball20%Attacking transition: 2.5% of the time on the ball55%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up22.8%
Progression54.9%
Chance creation19.8%
Attacking transition2.5%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Crystal Palace spends most of its time on the ball (55% of its time on the ball).

Ipswich

The question
When Ipswich has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Ipswich's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 11.1% of the time on the ball11%Progression: 53.4% of the time on the ball53%Chance creation: 29.9% of the time on the ball30%Attacking transition: 5.6% of the time on the ball6%53%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up11.1%
Progression53.4%
Chance creation29.9%
Attacking transition5.6%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Ipswich spends most of its time on the ball (53% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Crystal Palace
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Ipswich
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Crystal Palace — 602 touches
Ipswich — 651 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Crystal Palace

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Crystal Palace actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
432
ACTIONS
3%5%12%5%6%8%6%8%15%8%8%3%2%5%5%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
83
ACTIONS
1%5%13%8%2%12%4%10%16%10%4%4%6%6%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left half-space of the middle third (15.1% of all actions). 63% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 37% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 32% defensive, 46% middle, 23% attacking.

Ipswich

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Ipswich actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
494
ACTIONS
1%2%9%3%3%10%12%11%12%9%9%4%3%5%7%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
97
ACTIONS
2%8%7%2%7%10%21%13%8%9%1%1%1%8%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (12.4% of all actions). 61% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 39% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 19% defensive, 54% middle, 27% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Crystal Palace
33%Left side27%Middle40%Right sideATTACKING →
L
33%27%40%
R
Ipswich
32%Left side23%Middle45%Right sideATTACKING →
L
32%23%45%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Crystal Palace — 31 entries, 45% through the right wing
Left wing: 5 entries (16%)516%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 4 entries (13%)413%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 4 entries (13%)413%CENTRERight half-space: 4 entries (13%)413%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 14 entries (45%)1445%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Ipswich — 51 entries, 39% through the right wing
Left wing: 10 entries (20%)1020%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 7 entries (14%)714%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 9 entries (18%)918%CENTRERight half-space: 5 entries (10%)510%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 20 entries (39%)2039%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Crystal Palace

The football question
How does Crystal Palace progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

139build-up passes attempted
77%completed
35%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

58CB · 54%
7Long Wide · 7%
2Long Central · 2%
32Wide → FB · 30%
8Central · 7%
CB58 · 54%
left: 33 passes, most from Ahanor33right: 25 passes, most from Richards25
Long Wide7 · 7%
right: 4 passes, most from Benítez4left: 3 passes, most from Wharton3
Long Central2 · 2%
Wide → FB32 · 30%
left: 17 passes, most from Benítez17right: 15 passes, most from Khalaili15
Central8 · 7%
left: 8 passes, most from Mitchell8
◆ Vision AI Insight
Crystal Palace build predominantly down the left, with Benítez as the fulcrum (19 build-up passes). Only 36% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (11×).

Ipswich

The football question
How does Ipswich progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

93build-up passes attempted
72%completed
34%reach the middle third
4%go long into the final third

Pass types

27CB · 40%
5Long Wide · 7%
2Long Central · 3%
27Wide → FB · 40%
6Central · 9%
CB27 · 40%
left: 18 passes, most from Greaves18right: 9 passes, most from Diop9
Long Wide5 · 7%
left: 3 passes, most from Scherpen3right: 2 passes, most from Scherpen2
Long Central2 · 3%
Wide → FB27 · 40%
left: 19 passes, most from Scherpen19right: 8 passes, most from Scherpen8
Central6 · 9%
right: 5 passes, most from Scherpen5
◆ Vision AI Insight
Ipswich build predominantly down the left, with Scherpen as the fulcrum (23 build-up passes). Only 39% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (9×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Crystal Palace

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 42 progressive passes across 1 match (42.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
29%
Right half-space
12%
Central
17%
Left half-space
17%
Left wing
26%
Progression is left-dominant: 40% right side · 17% central · 43% left.

Who generates it

Tyrick Mitchell
8 · 19%
Walter Benítez
7 · 17%
Chris Richards
6 · 14%
Honest Ahanor
4 · 10%
Anan Khalaili
4 · 10%
Top two — Tyrick Mitchell & Walter Benítez — account for 36% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
42.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
19% reach final third
12% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 81% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 19% of progressive passes reached the final third and 12% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 36% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced

Ipswich

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 49 progressive passes across 1 match (49.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
39%
Right half-space
14%
Central
8%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
29%
Progression is right-dominant: 53% right side · 8% central · 39% left.

Who generates it

Dara O'Shea
10 · 20%
Leif Davis
7 · 14%
Exequiel Palacios
6 · 12%
Abdul Fatawu
6 · 12%
Samuel Amissah
4 · 8%
Top two — Dara O'Shea & Leif Davis — account for 35% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
49.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
35% reach final third
20% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 65% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 35% of progressive passes reached the final third and 20% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 35% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Crystal Palace

The question
Where do Crystal Palace's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

11shots
0.7xG
0.06xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (27%)27%3Settled attack: 8 shots (73%)73%811SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 27% of shots300.140.05
Cross100.060.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.080.04
Settled attack 73% of shots820.560.07
Cross100.100.10
Long ball200.090.05
Pass into the box / short pass420.250.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.110.11

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Daichi Kamada20.142
Will Hughes10.100
Anan Khalaili20.090
Jørgen Strand Larsen10.080
Tyrick Mitchell10.060

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Anan Khalaili40.261
Jørgen Strand Larsen30.181
Quinten Timber20.130
Ben Chilwell10.100
Adam Wharton10.030
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Crystal Palace's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.6 of 0.7 xG, 8 of 11 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 3 of the 11 shots (27%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 0 of the 11 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 0.7 xG (+1.3).

Ipswich

The question
Where do Ipswich's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

12shots
1.6xG
0.13xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
3goals
Attacking transition: 4 shots (33%)33%4Settled attack: 7 shots (58%)58%7Set piece: 1 shots (8%)8%112SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 33% of shots400.330.08
Pass into the box / short pass200.210.10
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.120.06
Settled attack 58% of shots731.170.17
Cross320.540.18
Pass into the box / short pass310.560.19
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.070.07
Set piece 8% of shots100.120.12
Corner100.120.12

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Julio Enciso20.531
Dara O'Shea20.371
Leif Davis10.161
Samuel Amissah10.160
Jack Clarke10.040

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Zian Flemming30.661
Emersonn30.401
Leif Davis20.261
Jack Clarke10.160
Julio Enciso20.100
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Ipswich's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.2 of 1.6 xG, 7 of 12 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 4 of the 12 shots (33%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 1 of the 12 shots came from set pieces; 3 goals from 1.6 xG (+1.4).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Crystal Palace

The question
How does Crystal Palace deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

15 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (27%), 2 led to a shot (13%). 0 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (—), 0 led to a shot (—).

Ipswich

The question
How does Ipswich deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

17 crosses: 6 found a team-mate (35%), 2 led to a shot (12%). 4 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (50%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Crystal Palace

The question
Which part of the final third does Crystal Palace actually cross from?

15 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 2 crosses (13%)13%2advanced right wing: 3 crosses (20%)20%3advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 1 crosses (7%)7%1advanced left wing: 2 crosses (13%)13%2byline right wing: 1 crosses (7%)7%1byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 6 crosses (40%)40%6
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing640%1
advanced · right wing320%0
deep · left wing213%0
advanced · left wing213%0
advanced · left half-space17%0
byline · right wing17%1

Ipswich

The question
Which part of the final third does Ipswich actually cross from?

17 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (6%)6%1advanced right wing: 3 crosses (18%)18%3advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 4 crosses (24%)24%4byline right wing: 5 crosses (29%)29%5byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 4 crosses (24%)24%4
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing529%1
advanced · left wing424%0
byline · left wing424%1
advanced · right wing318%0
deep · left wing16%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+1.13Crystal Palace on-ball value
+2.17Ipswich on-ball value
+0.0+1.1+2.2HALF TIME+1.13+2.170′15′30′45′60′75′90′
Crystal PalaceIpswichEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Crystal Palace — where the value came from
Passes432 actions+0.42
Carries83 actions+0.04
Dribbles12 actions+0.18
Shots11 actions+0.19
Ball wins60 actions+0.30
Ipswich — where the value came from
Passes494 actions+0.73
Carries97 actions+0.08
Dribbles13 actions-0.12
Shots12 actions+1.09
Ball wins53 actions+0.39
Crystal Palace — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Quinten Timber69+0.243
Will Hughes13+0.163
Walter Benítez32+0.134
Jørgen Strand Larsen24+0.128
Chris Richards73+0.094
Zavier Gozo (lowest)4-0.029
Ipswich — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Zian Flemming8+0.525
Leif Davis37+0.442
Emersonn19+0.300
Julio Enciso38+0.264
Issa Diop85+0.241
Jacob Greaves (lowest)79-0.068
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Crystal Palace

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.2 of 22 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%2/22Benítez12 of 53 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%12/53Benítez3 of 23 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%3/23Richards13 of 28 pass attempts lost here (46%).46%13/28Mitchell11 of 33 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%11/33Khalaili3 of 28 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%3/28Khalaili2 of 34 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%2/34Timber10 of 65 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%10/65Wharton5 of 33 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%5/33Pino10 of 33 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%10/33Wharton13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 of 23 pass attempts lost here (39%).39%9/23Timber8 of 22 pass attempts lost here (36%).36%8/22Richardsattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
37
Failed forward pass
28
Failed take-on
7
Lost in the defensive third
32
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 46% of 28 pass attempts there are lost (13 times). Separately, 37% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Ipswich

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

7 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.13 of 43 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%13/43Scherpen3 of 17 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%3/17Davis6 of 17 pass attempts lost here (35%).35%6/17Scherpen7 of 50 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%7/50O'Shea6 of 59 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%6/59O'Shea5 of 53 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%5/53O'Shea7 of 58 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%7/58Amissah7 of 44 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%7/44Davis18 of 45 pass attempts lost here (40%).40%18/45Fatawu5 of 18 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%5/18Enciso4 of 15 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%4/15O'Shea7 of 26 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%7/26Clarke8 of 33 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%8/33Clarkeattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
42
Failed forward pass
28
Failed take-on
7
Lost in the defensive third
26
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the attacking third: 40% of 45 pass attempts there are lost (18 times). Separately, 42% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Crystal Palace

Not just press intensity, but where the 166 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
15%
Middle third
31%
Own third
54%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.5 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 15% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 31% in midfield.

Where they win it back

8163018181285818611DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

Ipswich

Not just press intensity, but where the 146 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
12%
Middle third
42%
Own third
45%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.4 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 12% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 42% in midfield.

Where they win it back

5113011922121071167DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Crystal Palace

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Crystal Palace win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 34 opposition possessions that Crystal Palace ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.0passes
median 3 · before Crystal Palace win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
14sec
median 6s · 34.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
47%
24%
18%
12%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.0
8s
15–30′
5.1
14s
30–45+′
5.6
16s
45–60′
2.3
5s
60–75′
1.8
3s
75–90+′
8.6
28s
average passesaverage seconds

Ipswich

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Ipswich win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 26 opposition possessions that Ipswich ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
3.8passes
median 3 · before Ipswich win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
11sec
median 6s · 26.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
42%
38%
12%
8%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
2.7
3s
15–30′
4.5
10s
30–45+′
4.7
14s
45–60′
3.4
10s
60–75′

too few
75–90+′
3.0
12s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Crystal Palace — 166 actions, 133 won
Ipswich — 146 actions, 107 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Crystal Palace — 95 wins · 7% in the final third, 21% midfield, 72% own third
own third, right: 15 of 95 wins (16%)16%15 winsown third, centre: 32 of 95 wins (34%)34%32 winsown third, left: 21 of 95 wins (22%)22%21 winsmidfield, right: 8 of 95 wins (8%)8%8 winsmidfield, centre: 5 of 95 wins (5%)5%5 winsmidfield, left: 7 of 95 wins (7%)7%7 winsfinal third, right: 4 of 95 wins (4%)4%4 winsfinal third, centre: 2 of 95 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, left: 1 of 95 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Honest Ahanorball-recovery73′78
Quinten Timbertackle21′78
Anan Khalailiball-recovery11′75
Quinten Timberball-recovery11′69
Adam Whartonball-recovery10′68
Ipswich — 80 wins · 9% in the final third, 35% midfield, 56% own third
own third, right: 9 of 80 wins (11%)11%9 winsown third, centre: 25 of 80 wins (31%)31%25 winsown third, left: 11 of 80 wins (14%)14%11 winsmidfield, right: 11 of 80 wins (14%)14%11 winsmidfield, centre: 13 of 80 wins (16%)16%13 winsmidfield, left: 4 of 80 wins (5%)5%4 winsfinal third, right: 2 of 80 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, centre: 3 of 80 wins (4%)4%3 winsfinal third, left: 2 of 80 wins (2%)2%2 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Julio Encisoball-recovery38′96
Jack Clarketackle38′94
Zian Flemmingball-recovery97′79
Exequiel Palaciosinterception6′73
Dara O'Sheaball-recovery6′72
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Crystal Palace

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Crystal Palace? 49 opponent progressive passes and 12 shots faced (1.6 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Crystal Palace)

Right wing
42%
Right half-space
13%
Central
10%
Left half-space
11%
Left wing
24%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (42% of the danger conceded).

Ipswich

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Ipswich? 42 opponent progressive passes and 11 shots faced (0.7 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Ipswich)

Right wing
28%
Right half-space
12%
Central
19%
Left half-space
22%
Left wing
20%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (28% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Crystal Palace

Build-up (own third)

safer, slower, left-sided

right 21% · centre 47% · left 32%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
166
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+13.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
20%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
56% of 72
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
49%
Progression (middle third)

safer, slower, left-sided

right 28% · centre 24% · left 47%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
239
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
38% of 60
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
47%
Final third

safer, attacking the next line, less recycling

right 42% · centre 15% · left 43%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
122
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
14%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
16%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
20% of 41
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
56%

Ipswich

Build-up (own third)

safer, less recycling, left-sided

right 12% · centre 51% · left 37%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
115
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+15.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
27%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.2 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
57% of 54
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
43%
Progression (middle third)

safer

right 34% · centre 30% · left 36%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
326
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
42% of 71
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
54%
Final third

safer, shorter passing

right 45% · centre 14% · left 41%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
163
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
13%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
17% of 42
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
57%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Crystal Palace
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Expected goals0.70vs 1.18
PPDA4.5vs 6.3
Progressive passes42vs 37
Progressive carries46vs 40
Threat from passing5.56vs 5.29
Ipswich
compared with their other 7 matches this season
PPDA4.4vs 5.8
Expected goals1.62vs 1.04
Field tilt59%vs 41%
Final-third entries51vs 38
Progressive passes49vs 37

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Crystal Palace

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
13%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
53%
Safe / backward
32%
15% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 85% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Ipswich

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
13%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
51%
Safe / backward
34%
15% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 85% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Crystal Palace: 6 corners, 0 led to a shot; Ipswich: 3 corners, 1 led to a shot.

Crystal Palace

6Corners
0Led to a shot
6Free kicks, their half
0Set-piece shots
0.00Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
17%1 corner17%33%33%2 from the left flag4 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Ipswich

3Corners
1Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.12Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
33%1 corner67%1 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Crystal Palace
Ipswich

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report