Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportPremier League 2026-10-10

Ipswich v Fulham

1.071.15expected goals
1.460.84xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (1.07 – 1.15 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Ipswich
Fulham
Possession (share of passes)
47.6%52.4%
Duels
4950
Duels won
42.9%50.0%
Aerial duels
2828
Aerial duels won
1216
Successful dribbles
53
Passes
494543
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Ipswich above the line, Fulham below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.561.121.68Julio Enciso — miss, 0.05 xGJaden Philogene — save, 0.05 xGDavid Affengruber — miss, 0.08 xGRyan Sessegnon — miss, 0.06 xGSander Berge — save, 0.03 xGShea Charles — miss, 0.05 xGSander Berge — save, 0.07 xGGonzalo García — miss, 0.07 xGRyan Sessegnon — miss, 0.06 xGLeif Davis — miss, 0.03 xGJulio Enciso — save, 0.04 xGGonzalo García — save, 0.20 xGRyan Sessegnon — goal, 0.03 xGEmersonn — post, 0.12 xGOscar Bobb — miss, 0.18 xGGonzalo García — save, 0.07 xGEmersonn — miss, 0.09 xGIssa Diop — miss, 0.06 xGSindre Egeli — save, 0.07 xGChuba Akpom — save, 0.31 xGAbdoul Ouattara — goal, 0.03 xGDara O'Shea — goal, 0.22 xGKevin — save, 0.17 xGHugo Larsson — save, 0.09 xG1.071.15Jaden Philogene — save, 0.24 xGOTSander Berge — save, 0.05 xGOTSander Berge — save, 0.09 xGOTJulio Enciso — save, 0.14 xGOTGonzalo García — save, 0.10 xGOTRyan Sessegnon — goal, 0.31 xGOTGonzalo García — save, 0.02 xGOTSindre Egeli — save, 0.04 xGOTChuba Akpom — save, 0.24 xGOTAbdoul Ouattara — goal, 0.38 xGOTDara O'Shea — goal, 0.41 xGOTKevin — save, 0.22 xGOTHugo Larsson — save, 0.05 xGOT1.460.840'15'30'45'60'75'90'
IpswichFulhamsolid = xG24 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Ipswich
Fulham

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Ipswich or Fulham got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 3 of 3 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Ipswich

The question
When Ipswich has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Ipswich's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 19.4% of the time on the ball19%Progression: 50.2% of the time on the ball50%Chance creation: 30.4% of the time on the ball30%50%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up19.4%
Progression50.2%
Chance creation30.4%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Ipswich spends most of its time on the ball (50% of its time on the ball).

Fulham

The question
When Fulham has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Fulham's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 25.9% of the time on the ball26%Progression: 49.6% of the time on the ball50%Chance creation: 23.5% of the time on the ball24%Attacking transition: 1.0% of the time on the ball50%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up25.9%
Progression49.6%
Chance creation23.5%
Attacking transition1.0%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Fulham spends most of its time on the ball (50% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Ipswich
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Fulham
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Ipswich — 644 touches
Fulham — 688 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Ipswich

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Ipswich actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
494
ACTIONS
3%4%10%3%2%6%11%12%13%7%2%6%3%9%10%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
155
ACTIONS
6%8%1%2%6%14%12%12%10%5%2%3%5%12%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left half-space of the middle third (12.9% of all actions). 69% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 31% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 21% defensive, 50% middle, 29% attacking.

Fulham

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Fulham actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
543
ACTIONS
7%7%11%3%4%9%10%13%8%8%6%3%1%3%6%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
105
ACTIONS
9%5%9%7%3%10%8%10%13%8%9%2%2%2%6%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (13.0% of all actions). 59% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 41% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 33% defensive, 48% middle, 19% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Ipswich leaned on their left (46%); Fulham leaned on their right (42%).

Ipswich
46%Left side27%Middle27%Right sideATTACKING →
L
46%27%27%
R
Fulham
33%Left side24%Middle42%Right sideATTACKING →
L
33%24%42%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Ipswich — 54 entries, 35% through the left wing
Left wing: 19 entries (35%)1935%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 9 entries (17%)917%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 10 entries (19%)1019%CENTRERight half-space: 7 entries (13%)713%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 9 entries (17%)917%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Fulham — 44 entries, 36% through the left wing
Left wing: 16 entries (36%)1636%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 7 entries (16%)716%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 4 entries (9%)49%CENTRERight half-space: 3 entries (7%)37%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 14 entries (32%)1432%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Ipswich

The football question
How does Ipswich progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

109build-up passes attempted
77%completed
24%reach the middle third
5%go long into the final third

Pass types

34CB · 40%
9Long Wide · 11%
1Long Central · 1%
29Wide → FB · 35%
11Central · 13%
CB34 · 40%
right: 19 passes, most from Diop19left: 15 passes, most from Diop15
Long Wide9 · 11%
right: 7 passes, most from Walton7left: 2 passes, most from Walton2
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB29 · 35%
right: 21 passes, most from Walton21left: 8 passes, most from Amissah8
Central11 · 13%
right: 9 passes, most from Ouattara9left: 2 passes, most from Walton2
◆ Vision AI Insight
Ipswich build predominantly down the right, with Diop as the fulcrum (26 build-up passes). Only 29% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (12×).

Fulham

The football question
How does Fulham progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

179build-up passes attempted
75%completed
22%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

48CB · 36%
6Long Wide · 4%
1Long Central · 1%
64Wide → FB · 48%
15Central · 11%
CB48 · 36%
right: 30 passes, most from Affengruber30left: 18 passes, most from Bassey18
Long Wide6 · 4%
right: 4 passes, most from Leno4left: 2 passes, most from Sessegnon2
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB64 · 48%
right: 37 passes, most from Leno37left: 27 passes, most from Sessegnon27
Central15 · 11%
right: 8 passes, most from Berge8left: 7 passes, most from Charles7
◆ Vision AI Insight
Fulham build predominantly down the right, with Affengruber as the fulcrum (33 build-up passes). Only 22% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (15×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Ipswich

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 50 progressive passes across 1 match (50.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
10%
Right half-space
20%
Central
26%
Left half-space
12%
Left wing
32%
Progression is left-dominant: 30% right side · 26% central · 44% left.

Who generates it

Christian Walton
8 · 16%
Leif Davis
7 · 14%
Florentino
6 · 12%
Issa Diop
4 · 8%
Dara O'Shea
4 · 8%
Top two — Christian Walton & Leif Davis — account for 30% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
50.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
26% reach final third
14% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 74% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 26% of progressive passes reached the final third and 14% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 30% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacesterile
Centralefficient
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient

Fulham

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 43 progressive passes across 1 match (43.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
35%
Right half-space
9%
Central
5%
Left half-space
5%
Left wing
47%
Progression is left-dominant: 44% right side · 5% central · 51% left.

Who generates it

Kenny Tete
11 · 26%
Saša Lukic
10 · 23%
Ryan Sessegnon
7 · 16%
Calvin Bassey
4 · 9%
Bernd Leno
3 · 7%
Top two — Kenny Tete & Saša Lukic — account for 49% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
43.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
19% reach final third
23% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 81% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 19% of progressive passes reached the final third and 23% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 49% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacesterile
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Ipswich

The question
Where do Ipswich's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

11shots
1.1xG
0.10xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 2 shots (18%)18%2Settled attack: 8 shots (73%)73%8Set piece: 1 shots (9%)9%111SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 18% of shots200.100.05
Pass into the box / short pass200.100.05
Settled attack 73% of shots820.950.12
Cross110.220.22
Long ball200.380.19
Pass into the box / short pass300.250.08
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)210.090.04
Set piece 9% of shots100.030.03
Free kick100.030.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Samuel Amissah30.430
Jack Clarke10.221
Julio Enciso10.120
Florentino10.090
Daizen Maeda10.050

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Chuba Akpom10.310
Dara O'Shea10.221
Emersonn20.220
Julio Enciso20.080
Sindre Egeli10.070
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Ipswich's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.9 of 1.1 xG, 8 of 11 shots), mostly long ball. 2 of the 11 shots (18%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 1 of the 11 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 1.1 xG (+0.9).

Fulham

The question
Where do Fulham's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

13shots
1.1xG
0.09xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 1 shots (8%)8%1Settled attack: 9 shots (69%)69%9Set piece: 3 shots (23%)23%313SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 8% of shots100.200.20
Cut-back100.200.20
Settled attack 69% of shots900.810.09
Cross400.250.06
Cut-back100.170.17
Pass into the box / short pass200.260.13
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.140.07
Set piece 23% of shots310.130.04
Corner210.100.05
Free kick100.030.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Josh King20.380
Kenny Tete20.220
Saša Lukic20.120
Sander Berge10.070
Oscar Bobb10.070

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Gonzalo García30.340
Oscar Bobb10.180
Kevin10.170
Ryan Sessegnon30.141
Sander Berge20.100
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Fulham's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.8 of 1.1 xG, 9 of 13 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 1 of the 13 shots (8%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 13 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 1.1 xG (-0.1).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Ipswich

The question
How does Ipswich deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

8 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (50%), 1 led to a shot (12%). 4 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Fulham

The question
How does Fulham deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

17 crosses: 8 found a team-mate (47%), 5 led to a shot (29%). 2 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (100%), 2 led to a shot (100%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Ipswich

The question
Which part of the final third does Ipswich actually cross from?

8 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (12%)12%1advanced right wing: 1 crosses (12%)12%1advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (25%)25%2byline right wing: 1 crosses (12%)12%1byline right half-space: 1 crosses (12%)12%1byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 2 crosses (25%)25%2
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · left wing225%0
byline · left wing225%1
deep · left wing112%0
advanced · right wing112%0
byline · right wing112%0
byline · right half-space112%0

Fulham

The question
Which part of the final third does Fulham actually cross from?

17 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 3 crosses (18%)18%3deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 2 crosses (12%)12%2advanced right half-space: 1 crosses (6%)6%1advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 1 crosses (6%)6%1advanced left wing: 3 crosses (18%)18%3byline right wing: 4 crosses (24%)24%4byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 3 crosses (18%)18%3
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing424%1
deep · right wing318%0
advanced · left wing318%1
byline · left wing318%1
advanced · right wing212%1
advanced · right half-space16%1
advanced · left half-space16%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+1.57Ipswich on-ball value
+1.32Fulham on-ball value
+0.0+0.8+1.6HALF TIME+1.57+1.320′15′30′45′60′75′90′
IpswichFulhamEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Ipswich — where the value came from
Passes494 actions+0.66
Carries155 actions-0.06
Dribbles14 actions-0.04
Shots11 actions+0.77
Ball wins57 actions+0.24
Fulham — where the value came from
Passes543 actions+0.23
Carries105 actions+0.26
Dribbles15 actions-0.00
Shots13 actions+0.54
Ball wins52 actions+0.29
Ipswich — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Dara O'Shea92+0.436
Chuba Akpom3+0.286
Florentino47+0.187
Julio Enciso37+0.176
Samuel Amissah109+0.165
Daizen Maeda (lowest)27-0.103
Fulham — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Saša Lukic79+0.328
Bernd Leno39+0.205
Kevin7+0.182
Calvin Bassey83+0.162
Josh King46+0.132
Kenny Tete (lowest)73-0.039
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Ipswich

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.2 of 22 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%2/22Walton14 of 48 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%14/48Walton4 of 15 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%4/15Amissah11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.1 of 29 pass attempts lost here (3%).3%1/29Ouattara7 of 56 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%7/56Diop4 of 57 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%4/57O'Shea9 of 65 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%9/65O'Shea3 of 34 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%3/34Davis11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.11 of 30 pass attempts lost here (37%).37%11/30Ouattara13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.13 of 42 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%13/42Davis8 of 48 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%8/48Clarkeattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
35
Failed forward pass
22
Failed take-on
9
Lost in the defensive third
25
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the attacking third: 37% of 30 pass attempts there are lost (11 times). Separately, 42% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Fulham

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

21 of 39 pass attempts lost here (54%).54%21/39Affengrube7 of 37 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%7/37Bassey11 of 62 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%11/62Leno1 of 19 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%1/19Sessegnon5 of 22 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%5/22Sessegnon12 of 48 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%12/48King6 of 53 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%6/53Bassey7 of 73 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%7/73Berge0 of 41 pass attempts lost here (0%).0%0/415 of 46 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%5/46Lukic10 of 34 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%10/34Bobb14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.1 of 16 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%1/16Sessegnon5 of 33 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%5/33Lukicattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
21
Failed forward pass
11
Failed take-on
12
Lost in the defensive third
45
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 54% of 39 pass attempts there are lost (21 times). Separately, 22% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Ipswich

Not just press intensity, but where the 146 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
25%
Middle third
36%
Own third
38%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.7 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 25% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 36% in midfield.

Where they win it back

45249147914158588412DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

Fulham

Not just press intensity, but where the 146 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
10%
Middle third
26%
Own third
64%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 6.4 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 10% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 26% in midfield.

Where they win it back

191237161011109DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Ipswich

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Ipswich win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 31 opposition possessions that Ipswich ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.8passes
median 3 · before Ipswich win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
17sec
median 5s · 31.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
48%
23%
3%
26%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
7.0
21s
15–30′
6.3
16s
30–45+′
10.7
36s
45–60′
5.8
13s
60–75′
3.1
9s
75–90+′
6.7
25s
average passesaverage seconds

Fulham

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Fulham win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 31 opposition possessions that Fulham ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.1passes
median 3 · before Fulham win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
14sec
median 8s · 31.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
35%
26%
19%
19%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.9
12s
15–30′
3.0
6s
30–45+′
7.6
25s
45–60′
5.0
14s
60–75′
4.3
9s
75–90+′
4.7
12s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Ipswich — 146 actions, 110 won
Fulham — 146 actions, 111 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Ipswich — 79 wins · 15% in the final third, 30% midfield, 54% own third
own third, right: 7 of 79 wins (9%)9%7 winsown third, centre: 21 of 79 wins (27%)27%21 winsown third, left: 15 of 79 wins (19%)19%15 winsmidfield, right: 7 of 79 wins (9%)9%7 winsmidfield, centre: 5 of 79 wins (6%)6%5 winsmidfield, left: 12 of 79 wins (15%)15%12 winsfinal third, right: 5 of 79 wins (6%)6%5 winsfinal third, centre: 3 of 79 wins (4%)4%3 winsfinal third, left: 4 of 79 wins (5%)5%4 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Jaden Philogeneball-recovery24′86
Abdoul Ouattaraball-recovery73′81
Abdoul Ouattaraball-recovery15′81
Julio Encisoball-recovery10′76
Emersonnball-recovery68′75
Fulham — 81 wins · 5% in the final third, 19% midfield, 77% own third
own third, right: 16 of 81 wins (20%)20%16 winsown third, centre: 33 of 81 wins (41%)41%33 winsown third, left: 13 of 81 wins (16%)16%13 winsmidfield, right: 7 of 81 wins (9%)9%7 winsmidfield, centre: 5 of 81 wins (6%)6%5 winsmidfield, left: 3 of 81 wins (4%)4%3 winsfinal third, right: 3 of 81 wins (4%)4%3 winsfinal third, centre: 0 of 81 wins (0%)final third, left: 1 of 81 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Oscar Bobbball-recovery20′95
David Affengrubertackle54′83
David Affengruberball-recovery54′77
Sander Bergeball-recovery8′68
Gonzalo Garcíaball-recovery84′62
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Ipswich

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Ipswich? 43 opponent progressive passes and 13 shots faced (1.1 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Ipswich)

Right wing
34%
Right half-space
11%
Central
5%
Left half-space
4%
Left wing
46%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (46% of the danger conceded).

Fulham

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Fulham? 50 opponent progressive passes and 11 shots faced (1.1 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Fulham)

Right wing
13%
Right half-space
16%
Central
34%
Left half-space
11%
Left wing
26%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the central (34% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Ipswich

Build-up (own third)

safer, played inside, longer passing

right 25% · centre 54% · left 20%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
138
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+14.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
28%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
50% of 50
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
52%
Progression (middle third)

safer, played inside, narrow, central

right 30% · centre 32% · left 38%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
331
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
26%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.4 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
47% of 66
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
50%
Final third

safer, left-sided, played inside

right 24% · centre 16% · left 59%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
194
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
6%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.1 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
20% of 45
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
47%

Fulham

Build-up (own third)

safer, right-sided, touchline to touchline

right 38% · centre 40% · left 22%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
217
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+10.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
18%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
44% of 73
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
62%
Progression (middle third)

safer, playing short, circulating

right 34% · centre 33% · left 33%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
319
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
40% of 58
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
45%
Final third

safer, more recycling, circulating

right 46% · centre 10% · left 43%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
127
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
-0.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
37% of 30
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
33%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Ipswich
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Final-third entries54vs 38
Pass accuracy83%vs 80%
PPDA4.7vs 5.8
Field tilt58%vs 41%
Progressive passes50vs 37
Fulham
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Progressive carries35vs 57
Field tilt42%vs 56%
Passes543vs 625
PPDA6.4vs 5.4
Pass accuracy82%vs 85%

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Ipswich

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
15%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
41%
Safe / backward
41%
17% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 83% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Fulham

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
11%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
47%
Safe / backward
41%
13% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 87% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Ipswich: 2 corners, 0 led to a shot; Fulham: 5 corners, 2 led to a shot, 1 set-piece goal.

Ipswich

2Corners
0Led to a shot
6Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.03Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
50%1 corner50%1 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Fulham

5Corners
2Led to a shot
2Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.13Set-piece xG
1Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
40%20%1 corner20%20%2 from the left flag3 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Ipswich
Fulham

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report