Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportPremier League 2026-09-12

Liverpool v Fulham

1.110.74expected goals
0.821.37xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (1.11 – 0.74 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Liverpool
Fulham
Possession (share of passes)
55.5%44.5%
Duels
3440
Duels won
67.6%42.5%
Aerial duels
1919
Aerial duels won
136
Successful dribbles
63
Passes
549440
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Liverpool above the line, Fulham below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.531.051.58Alexander Isak — miss, 0.07 xGJosh King — miss, 0.11 xGGonzalo García — save, 0.11 xGVíctor Muñoz — save, 0.03 xGRyan Gravenberch — save, 0.03 xGFlorian Wirtz — miss, 0.04 xGJosh King — save, 0.04 xGFlorian Wirtz — miss, 0.07 xGJosh King — save, 0.05 xGAntonee Robinson — miss, 0.09 xGBradley Barcola — miss, 0.14 xGSaša Lukic — save, 0.10 xGSaša Lukic — save, 0.10 xGAlexander Isak — save, 0.12 xGCalvin Bassey — save, 0.06 xGDominik Szoboszlai — save, 0.05 xGAlexis Mac Allister — save, 0.02 xGCody Gakpo — save, 0.08 xGJosh King — save, 0.05 xGKevin — miss, 0.04 xGFlorian Wirtz — save, 0.11 xGDominik Szoboszlai — save, 0.02 xGAlexander Isak — miss, 0.16 xGRio Ngumoha — miss, 0.19 xG1.110.74Gonzalo García — save, 0.30 xGOTVíctor Muñoz — save, 0.06 xGOTRyan Gravenberch — save, 0.06 xGOTJosh King — save, 0.29 xGOTJosh King — save, 0.13 xGOTSaša Lukic — save, 0.20 xGOTSaša Lukic — save, 0.22 xGOTAlexander Isak — save, 0.17 xGOTCalvin Bassey — save, 0.03 xGOTDominik Szoboszlai — save, 0.02 xGOTAlexis Mac Allister — save, 0.02 xGOTCody Gakpo — save, 0.32 xGOTJosh King — save, 0.20 xGOTFlorian Wirtz — save, 0.13 xGOTDominik Szoboszlai — save, 0.03 xGOT0.821.370'15'30'45'60'75'90'
LiverpoolFulhamsolid = xG24 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Liverpool
Fulham
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Liverpool

The question
When Liverpool has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Liverpool's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 18.5% of the time on the ball19%Progression: 50.4% of the time on the ball50%Chance creation: 29.6% of the time on the ball30%Attacking transition: 1.5% of the time on the ball50%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up18.5%
Progression50.4%
Chance creation29.6%
Attacking transition1.5%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Liverpool spends most of its time on the ball (50% of its time on the ball).

Fulham

The question
When Fulham has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Fulham's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 39.3% of the time on the ball39%Progression: 38.6% of the time on the ball39%Chance creation: 22.1% of the time on the ball22%39%BUILD-UP
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up39.3%
Progression38.6%
Chance creation22.1%
Vision AI Model Insight
Build-up is where Fulham spends most of its time on the ball (39% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Liverpool
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Fulham
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Liverpool — 694 touches
Fulham — 584 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Liverpool

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Liverpool actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
549
ACTIONS
3%4%8%4%2%10%11%11%13%9%5%3%2%5%10%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
120
ACTIONS
2%4%7%3%4%15%6%17%13%6%6%2%2%2%12%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left half-space of the middle third (12.7% of all actions). 61% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 39% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 21% defensive, 54% middle, 25% attacking.

Fulham

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Fulham actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
440
ACTIONS
12%6%12%4%6%6%7%8%12%7%2%2%2%3%10%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
83
ACTIONS
4%10%10%5%2%10%7%16%13%5%1%2%2%2%11%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left half-space of the middle third (12.2% of all actions). 58% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 42% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 39% defensive, 42% middle, 19% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Liverpool leaned on their left (48%); Fulham leaned on their left (54%).

Liverpool
48%Left side21%Middle31%Right sideATTACKING →
L
48%21%31%
R
Fulham
54%Left side24%Middle21%Right sideATTACKING →
L
54%24%21%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Liverpool — 57 entries, 32% through the left wing
Left wing: 18 entries (32%)1832%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 11 entries (19%)1119%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 5 entries (9%)59%CENTRERight half-space: 5 entries (9%)59%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 18 entries (32%)1832%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Fulham — 29 entries, 48% through the left wing
Left wing: 14 entries (48%)1448%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 6 entries (21%)621%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 3 entries (10%)310%CENTRERight half-space: 3 entries (10%)310%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 3 entries (10%)310%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Liverpool

The football question
How does Liverpool progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

116build-up passes attempted
83%completed
34%reach the middle third
3%go long into the final third

Pass types

39CB · 41%
7Long Wide · 7%
1Long Central · 1%
35Wide → FB · 36%
14Central · 15%

Sequence success — build-up

30build-up sequences in this match
3%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
37%turned over with nothing to show
CB39 · 41%
right: 20 passes, most from Jacquet20left: 19 passes, most from Dijk19
Long Wide7 · 7%
left: 4 passes, most from Becker4right: 3 passes, most from Becker3
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB35 · 36%
right: 18 passes, most from Becker18left: 17 passes, most from Becker17
Central14 · 15%
right: 9 passes, most from Becker9left: 5 passes, most from Tsimikas5
◆ Vision AI Insight
Liverpool build predominantly down the right, with Becker as the fulcrum (28 build-up passes). Only 38% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (8×).

Fulham

The football question
How does Fulham progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

179build-up passes attempted
72%completed
20%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third

Pass types

56CB · 44%
6Long Wide · 5%
1Long Central · 1%
50Wide → FB · 39%
15Central · 12%

Sequence success — build-up

42build-up sequences in this match
12%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
50%turned over with nothing to show
CB56 · 44%
right: 40 passes, most from Castagne40left: 16 passes, most from Bassey16
Long Wide6 · 5%
left: 6 passes, most from Robinson6
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB50 · 39%
left: 25 passes, most from Leno25right: 25 passes, most from Leno25
Central15 · 12%
left: 9 passes, most from Berge9right: 6 passes, most from Berge6
◆ Vision AI Insight
Fulham build predominantly down the right, with Affengruber as the fulcrum (21 build-up passes). Only 22% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (9×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Liverpool

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 40 progressive passes across 1 match (40.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
28%
Right half-space
18%
Central
12%
Left half-space
12%
Left wing
30%
Progression is right-dominant: 45% right side · 12% central · 42% left.

Who generates it

Dominik Szoboszlai
7 · 18%
Alisson Becker
6 · 15%
Bradley Barcola
4 · 10%
Kostas Tsimikas
4 · 10%
Ryan Gravenberch
3 · 8%
Top two — Dominik Szoboszlai & Alisson Becker — account for 32% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
40.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
22% reach final third
18% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 78% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 22% of progressive passes reached the final third and 18% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 32% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingsterile

Fulham

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 32 progressive passes across 1 match (32.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
19%
Right half-space
3%
Central
12%
Left half-space
6%
Left wing
59%
Progression is left-dominant: 22% right side · 12% central · 66% left.

Who generates it

Antonee Robinson
11 · 34%
Saša Lukic
7 · 22%
Bernd Leno
4 · 12%
Oscar Bobb
4 · 12%
Shea Charles
2 · 6%
Top two — Antonee Robinson & Saša Lukic — account for 56% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
32.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
19% reach final third
31% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 81% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 19% of progressive passes reached the final third and 31% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 56% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacesterile
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Liverpool

The question
Where do Liverpool's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

14shots
1.1xG
0.08xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Attacking transition: 6 shots (43%)43%6Settled attack: 5 shots (36%)36%5Set piece: 3 shots (21%)21%314SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 43% of shots600.530.09
Cross100.190.19
Pass into the box / short pass500.340.07
Settled attack 36% of shots500.380.08
Cross100.140.14
Cut-back100.080.08
Pass into the box / short pass300.160.05
Set piece 21% of shots300.200.07
Corner200.190.09
Free kick100.020.02

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Jeremie Frimpong20.270
Dominik Szoboszlai20.180
Alexis Mac Allister20.160
Florian Wirtz20.150
Bradley Barcola10.070

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Alexander Isak30.340
Florian Wirtz30.210
Rio Ngumoha10.190
Bradley Barcola10.140
Cody Gakpo10.080
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Liverpool's chances, by xG, is attacking transition (0.5 of 1.1 xG, 6 of 14 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 6 of the 14 shots (43%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 14 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 1.1 xG (-1.1).

Fulham

The question
Where do Fulham's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

10shots
0.7xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Attacking transition: 4 shots (40%)40%4Settled attack: 3 shots (30%)30%3Set piece: 3 shots (30%)30%310SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 40% of shots400.340.09
Cut-back200.190.10
Pass into the box / short pass200.150.08
Settled attack 30% of shots300.250.08
Cut-back100.090.09
Pass into the box / short pass200.150.08
Set piece 30% of shots300.150.05
Corner300.150.05

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Gonzalo García20.190
Antonee Robinson20.150
Josh King10.110
Oscar Bobb10.090
Sander Berge10.040

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Josh King40.250
Saša Lukic20.190
Gonzalo García10.110
Antonee Robinson10.090
Calvin Bassey10.060
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Fulham's chances, by xG, is attacking transition (0.3 of 0.7 xG, 4 of 10 shots), mostly cut-back. 4 of the 10 shots (40%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 10 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 0.7 xG (-0.7).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Liverpool

The question
How does Liverpool deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

20 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (20%), 2 led to a shot (10%). 3 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (33%), 1 led to a shot (33%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Fulham

The question
How does Fulham deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

15 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (33%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 3 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (67%), 2 led to a shot (67%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Liverpool

The question
Which part of the final third does Liverpool actually cross from?

20 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 4 crosses (20%)20%4advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 1 crosses (5%)5%1advanced left wing: 2 crosses (10%)10%2byline right wing: 4 crosses (20%)20%4byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 9 crosses (45%)45%9
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing945%0
advanced · right wing420%1
byline · right wing420%1
advanced · left wing210%0
advanced · left half-space15%0

Fulham

The question
Which part of the final third does Fulham actually cross from?

15 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (7%)7%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (7%)7%1advanced right wing: 2 crosses (13%)13%2advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (13%)13%2byline right wing: 1 crosses (7%)7%1byline right half-space: 1 crosses (7%)7%1byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 1 crosses (7%)7%1byline left wing: 6 crosses (40%)40%6
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing640%0
advanced · right wing213%0
advanced · left wing213%0
deep · right wing17%0
deep · left wing17%0
byline · right wing17%0
byline · right half-space17%0
byline · left half-space17%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+1.38Liverpool on-ball value
+0.71Fulham on-ball value
+0.0+0.7+1.4HALF TIME+1.38+0.710′15′30′45′60′75′90′
LiverpoolFulhamEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Liverpool — where the value came from
Passes549 actions+0.42
Carries120 actions+0.05
Dribbles17 actions+0.05
Shots14 actions+0.61
Ball wins55 actions+0.26
Fulham — where the value came from
Passes440 actions+0.21
Carries83 actions+0.13
Dribbles11 actions+0.01
Shots10 actions+0.12
Ball wins61 actions+0.23
Liverpool — most valuable players
PlayerActionsOBV
Dominik Szoboszlai83+0.358
Alexander Isak13+0.242
Florian Wirtz84+0.186
Jérémy Jacquet112+0.185
Bradley Barcola35+0.112
Kostas Tsimikas (lowest)52-0.167
Fulham — most valuable players
PlayerActionsOBV
Oscar Bobb30+0.225
Josh King39+0.222
Saša Lukic60+0.185
Kevin13+0.113
Gonzalo García20+0.088
Antonee Robinson (lowest)65-0.262
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Liverpool

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

6 of 16 pass attempts lost here (38%).38%6/16Jacquet2 of 24 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%2/24Jacquet7 of 45 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%7/45Becker2 of 21 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%2/21Barcola10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 of 53 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%8/53Araujo9 of 58 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%9/58Szoboszlai10 of 63 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%10/63Szoboszlai8 of 69 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%8/69Dijk10 of 48 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%10/48Tsimikas9 of 29 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%9/29Szoboszlai4 of 18 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%4/18Araujo12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 30 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%6/30Tsimikas18 of 53 pass attempts lost here (34%).34%18/53Barcolaattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
38
Failed forward pass
26
Failed take-on
11
Lost in the defensive third
20
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 38% of 16 pass attempts there are lost (6 times). Separately, 37% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Fulham

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

17 of 52 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%17/52Castagne6 of 28 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%6/28Affengrube18 of 53 pass attempts lost here (34%).34%18/53Leno2 of 18 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%2/18Bassey8 of 28 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%8/28Robinson9 of 26 pass attempts lost here (35%).35%9/26Castagne6 of 32 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%6/32Lukic7 of 35 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%7/35Affengrube8 of 53 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%8/53Charles9 of 32 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%9/32Robinson9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.7 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.11 of 44 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%11/44Robinsonattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
24
Failed forward pass
14
Failed take-on
8
Lost in the defensive third
51
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the middle third: 35% of 26 pass attempts there are lost (9 times). Separately, 21% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Liverpool

Not just press intensity, but where the 130 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
22%
Middle third
41%
Own third
38%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.4 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 22% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 41% in midfield.

Where they win it back

1114146414126714533314DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

Fulham

Not just press intensity, but where the 147 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
10%
Middle third
29%
Own third
61%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 8.1 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 10% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 29% in midfield.

Where they win it back

171531101710759115DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Liverpool

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Liverpool win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 23 opposition possessions that Liverpool ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.0passes
median 2 · before Liverpool win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
15sec
median 3s · 23.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
57%
26%
4%
13%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.2
13s
15–30′
3.1
16s
30–45+′
4.0
8s
45–60′

too few
60–75′
9.0
32s
75–90+′
1.7
1s
average passesaverage seconds

Fulham

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Fulham win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 28 opposition possessions that Fulham ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
6.6passes
median 4 · before Fulham win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
22sec
median 18s · 28.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
36%
18%
21%
25%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
7.7
31s
15–30′
10.0
37s
30–45+′
3.8
11s
45–60′
4.5
13s
60–75′
7.0
20s
75–90+′
6.3
22s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Liverpool — 130 actions, 108 won
Fulham — 147 actions, 116 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Liverpool — 79 wins · 14% in the final third, 35% midfield, 51% own third
own third, right: 18 of 79 wins (23%)23%18 winsown third, centre: 18 of 79 wins (23%)23%18 winsown third, left: 4 of 79 wins (5%)5%4 winsmidfield, right: 12 of 79 wins (15%)15%12 winsmidfield, centre: 5 of 79 wins (6%)6%5 winsmidfield, left: 11 of 79 wins (14%)14%11 winsfinal third, right: 3 of 79 wins (4%)4%3 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 79 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 7 of 79 wins (9%)9%7 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Kostas Tsimikasball-recovery20′90
Bradley Barcolatackle20′89
Alexis Mac Allistertackle66′83
Florian Wirtzball-recovery70′81
Bradley Barcolatackle16′78
Fulham — 95 wins · 6% in the final third, 22% midfield, 72% own third
own third, right: 18 of 95 wins (19%)19%18 winsown third, centre: 34 of 95 wins (36%)36%34 winsown third, left: 16 of 95 wins (17%)17%16 winsmidfield, right: 8 of 95 wins (8%)8%8 winsmidfield, centre: 6 of 95 wins (6%)6%6 winsmidfield, left: 7 of 95 wins (7%)7%7 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 95 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 1 of 95 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 4 of 95 wins (4%)4%4 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Shea Charlesball-recovery80′87
Gonzalo Garcíaball-recovery10′86
David Affengrubertackle44′80
Shea Charlesinterception80′76
Oscar Bobbinterception15′73
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Liverpool

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Liverpool? 32 opponent progressive passes and 10 shots faced (0.7 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Liverpool)

Right wing
24%
Right half-space
0%
Central
20%
Left half-space
5%
Left wing
50%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (50% of the danger conceded).

Fulham

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Fulham? 40 opponent progressive passes and 14 shots faced (1.1 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Fulham)

Right wing
31%
Right half-space
20%
Central
16%
Left half-space
13%
Left wing
20%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (31% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Liverpool

Build-up (own third)

safer, less recycling, played inside

right 30% · centre 48% · left 23%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
141
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+12.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
19%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.4 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
64% of 58
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
40%
Progression (middle third)

safer, longer passing, trying to break lines

right 34% · centre 32% · left 34%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
361
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
14%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
39% of 80
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
54%
Final third

safer, left-sided

right 33% · centre 12% · left 55%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
184
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
23% of 48
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
58%

Fulham

Build-up (own third)

safer, played in the channels, touchline to touchline

right 43% · centre 34% · left 23%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
210
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+12.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
12%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
25%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
35% of 75
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
61%
Progression (middle third)

safer, left-sided, played inside

right 28% · centre 29% · left 43%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
221
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
35% of 60
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
60%
Final third

safer, left-sided, more recycling

right 20% · centre 10% · left 70%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
103
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
24% of 33
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
45%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Liverpool
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Defensive actions130vs 155
Progressive passes40vs 46
Field tilt63%vs 55%
Passes549vs 496
Expected goals1.11vs 1.53
Fulham
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Pass accuracy74%vs 86%
PPDA8.1vs 5.2
Passes440vs 639
Final-third entries29vs 47
Progressive carries28vs 58

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Liverpool

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
17%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
47%
Safe / backward
35%
18% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 82% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Fulham

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
11%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
54%
Safe / backward
33%
13% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 87% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Liverpool: 5 corners, 2 led to a shot; Fulham: 8 corners, 3 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Liverpool

5Corners
2Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.20Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
20%1 corner40%20%20%3 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Fulham

8Corners
3Led to a shot
2Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.15Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
25%12%1 corner12%1 corner12%25%12%5 from the left flag3 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Liverpool
Fulham

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report