Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportPremier League 2026-10-11

Liverpool v Man City

1.091.25expected goals
0.881.18xG on target (xGOT)

Man City won by more than the chances suggest (1.09 – 1.25 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Liverpool
Man City
Possession (share of passes)
35.3%64.7%
Duels
4639
Duels won
45.7%46.2%
Aerial duels
2121
Aerial duels won
912
Successful dribbles
810
Passes
324594
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Liverpool above the line, Man City below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.480.961.43Víctor Muñoz — save, 0.05 xGJérémy Jacquet — save, 0.43 xGAlexis Mac Allister — save, 0.08 xGVíctor Muñoz — save, 0.03 xGEnzo Fernández — save, 0.04 xGRayan Cherki — miss, 0.05 xGAntoine Semenyo — miss, 0.03 xGFlorian Wirtz — save, 0.05 xGLewis Koumas — save, 0.08 xGBradley Barcola — save, 0.06 xGRyan Gravenberch — save, 0.02 xGAlexis Mac Allister — miss, 0.04 xGFlorian Wirtz — miss, 0.08 xGAlexis Mac Allister — miss, 0.12 xGErling Haaland — miss, 0.09 xGRyan Gravenberch — save, 0.03 xGJérémy Doku — save, 0.06 xGErling Haaland — goal, 0.09 xGJérémy Doku — goal, 0.06 xGRayan Cherki — save, 0.05 xGElliot Anderson — miss, 0.04 xGJosko Gvardiol — miss, 0.07 xGRayan Cherki — goal, 0.49 xGAlexis Mac Allister — save, 0.03 xGRayan Cherki — save, 0.06 xGAyyoub Bouaddi — miss, 0.04 xGRayan Cherki — save, 0.04 xGElliot Anderson — miss, 0.03 xG1.091.25Víctor Muñoz — save, 0.13 xGOTJérémy Jacquet — save, 0.20 xGOTAlexis Mac Allister — save, 0.04 xGOTVíctor Muñoz — save, 0.05 xGOTEnzo Fernández — save, 0.09 xGOTFlorian Wirtz — save, 0.05 xGOTLewis Koumas — save, 0.03 xGOTBradley Barcola — save, 0.03 xGOTRyan Gravenberch — save, 0.11 xGOTRyan Gravenberch — save, 0.02 xGOTJérémy Doku — save, 0.07 xGOTErling Haaland — goal, 0.08 xGOTJérémy Doku — goal, 0.23 xGOTRayan Cherki — save, 0.03 xGOTRayan Cherki — goal, 0.60 xGOTAlexis Mac Allister — save, 0.22 xGOTRayan Cherki — save, 0.05 xGOTRayan Cherki — save, 0.04 xGOT0.881.180'15'30'45'60'75'90'
LiverpoolMan Citysolid = xG28 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Liverpool
Man City

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Liverpool or Man City got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 3 of 3 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Liverpool

The question
When Liverpool has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Liverpool's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 18.4% of the time on the ball18%Progression: 54.7% of the time on the ball55%Chance creation: 21.7% of the time on the ball22%Attacking transition: 5.2% of the time on the ball5%55%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up18.4%
Progression54.7%
Chance creation21.7%
Attacking transition5.2%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Liverpool spends most of its time on the ball (55% of its time on the ball).

Man City

The question
When Man City has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Man City's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 23.5% of the time on the ball23%Progression: 50.9% of the time on the ball51%Chance creation: 24.3% of the time on the ball24%Attacking transition: 1.4% of the time on the ball51%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up23.5%
Progression50.9%
Chance creation24.3%
Attacking transition1.4%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Man City spends most of its time on the ball (51% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Liverpool
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Man City
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Liverpool — 455 touches
Man City — 732 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Liverpool

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Liverpool actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
324
ACTIONS
5%4%10%8%5%7%9%8%15%11%5%3%2%4%4%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
53
ACTIONS
2%4%13%2%17%6%15%11%11%8%2%6%4%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left half-space of the middle third (14.6% of all actions). 62% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 38% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 30% defensive, 52% middle, 18% attacking.

Man City

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Man City actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
594
ACTIONS
4%3%12%5%4%9%7%12%11%11%5%2%3%6%7%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
153
ACTIONS
5%5%9%10%1%10%5%9%10%12%5%3%3%5%10%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (11.5% of all actions). 60% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 40% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 28% defensive, 49% middle, 23% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Liverpool
37%Left side27%Middle36%Right sideATTACKING →
L
37%27%36%
R
Man City
47%Left side24%Middle29%Right sideATTACKING →
L
47%24%29%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Liverpool — 31 entries, 29% through the centre
Left wing: 6 entries (19%)619%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 5 entries (16%)516%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 9 entries (29%)929%CENTRERight half-space: 2 entries (6%)26%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 9 entries (29%)929%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Man City — 54 entries, 39% through the left wing
Left wing: 21 entries (39%)2139%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 12 entries (22%)1222%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 1 entries (2%)12%CENTRERight half-space: 7 entries (13%)713%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 13 entries (24%)1324%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Liverpool

The football question
How does Liverpool progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

103build-up passes attempted
74%completed
33%reach the middle third
4%go long into the final third

Pass types

32CB · 42%
5Long Wide · 7%
31Wide → FB · 41%
8Central · 11%
CB32 · 42%
left: 20 passes, most from Dijk20right: 12 passes, most from Jacquet12
Long Wide5 · 7%
right: 4 passes, most from Allister4
Wide → FB31 · 41%
left: 19 passes, most from Becker19right: 12 passes, most from Araujo12
Central8 · 11%
right: 5 passes, most from Araujo5left: 3 passes, most from Wirtz3
◆ Vision AI Insight
Liverpool build predominantly down the left, with Becker as the fulcrum (20 build-up passes). Only 37% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (8×).

Man City

The football question
How does Man City progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

165build-up passes attempted
84%completed
28%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

72CB · 52%
6Long Wide · 4%
45Wide → FB · 33%
15Central · 11%
CB72 · 52%
left: 40 passes, most from Guéhi40right: 32 passes, most from Dias32
Long Wide6 · 4%
left: 5 passes, most from Donnarumma5
Wide → FB45 · 33%
left: 23 passes, most from Donnarumma23right: 22 passes, most from Donnarumma22
Central15 · 11%
left: 9 passes, most from Donnarumma9right: 6 passes, most from Donnarumma6
◆ Vision AI Insight
Man City build predominantly down the left, with Guéhi as the fulcrum (37 build-up passes). Only 28% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LHS def → C def (10×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Liverpool

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 33 progressive passes across 1 match (33.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
27%
Right half-space
12%
Central
9%
Left half-space
42%
Left wing
9%
Progression is left-dominant: 39% right side · 9% central · 52% left.

Who generates it

Alexis Mac Allister
7 · 21%
Ronald Araujo
5 · 15%
Virgil van Dijk
5 · 15%
Florian Wirtz
4 · 12%
Bradley Barcola
4 · 12%
Top two — Alexis Mac Allister & Ronald Araujo — account for 36% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
33.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
30% reach final third
12% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 70% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 30% of progressive passes reached the final third and 12% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 36% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spaceefficient
Left wingsterile

Man City

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 40 progressive passes across 1 match (40.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
25%
Right half-space
20%
Central
10%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
35%
Progression is central-dominant: 45% right side · 10% central · 45% left.

Who generates it

Rayan Cherki
6 · 15%
Rúben Dias
6 · 15%
Matheus Nunes
5 · 12%
Antoine Semenyo
4 · 10%
Elliot Anderson
4 · 10%
Top two — Rayan Cherki & Rúben Dias — account for 30% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
40.0 prog passes/game
mostly central
→
PENETRATION
30% reach final third
28% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 70% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 30% of progressive passes reached the final third and 28% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 30% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the central side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingsterile
Right half-spaceefficient
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Liverpool

The question
Where do Liverpool's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

13shots
1.1xG
0.08xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Attacking transition: 5 shots (38%)38%5Settled attack: 5 shots (38%)38%5Set piece: 3 shots (23%)23%313SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 38% of shots500.300.06
Pass into the box / short pass300.170.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.130.06
Settled attack 38% of shots500.250.05
Cross100.120.12
Cut-back100.040.04
Pass into the box / short pass300.100.03
Set piece 23% of shots300.540.18
Corner200.510.25
Free kick100.030.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Bradley Barcola30.180
Florian Wirtz10.120
Alexis Mac Allister20.050
Ronald Araujo10.050
Ryan Gravenberch10.030

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Jérémy Jacquet10.430
Alexis Mac Allister40.260
Florian Wirtz20.130
Víctor Muñoz20.080
Lewis Koumas10.080
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Liverpool's chances, by xG, is set piece (0.5 of 1.1 xG, 3 of 13 shots), mostly corner. 5 of the 13 shots (38%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 13 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 1.1 xG (-1.1).

Man City

The question
Where do Man City's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

15shots
1.2xG
0.08xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
3goals
Attacking transition: 1 shots (7%)7%1Settled attack: 12 shots (80%)80%12Set piece: 2 shots (13%)13%215SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 7% of shots100.050.05
Cut-back100.050.05
Settled attack 80% of shots1231.130.09
Cut-back100.070.07
Long ball110.060.06
Pass into the box / short pass910.910.10
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)110.090.09
Set piece 13% of shots200.070.04
Corner200.070.04

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Josko Gvardiol10.491
Ayyoub Bouaddi30.150
Elliot Anderson20.111
Jérémy Doku20.110
Antoine Semenyo10.090

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Rayan Cherki50.691
Erling Haaland20.181
Jérémy Doku20.121
Elliot Anderson20.070
Josko Gvardiol10.070
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Man City's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.1 of 1.2 xG, 12 of 15 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 1 of the 15 shots (7%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 15 shots came from set pieces; 3 goals from 1.2 xG (+1.8).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Liverpool

The question
How does Liverpool deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

9 crosses: 3 found a team-mate (33%), 1 led to a shot (11%). 2 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (50%), 1 led to a shot (50%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Man City

The question
How does Man City deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

13 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (38%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 4 cut-backs: 3 found a team-mate (75%), 2 led to a shot (50%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Liverpool

The question
Which part of the final third does Liverpool actually cross from?

9 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 1 crosses (11%)11%1advanced left wing: 2 crosses (22%)22%2byline right wing: 5 crosses (56%)56%5byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 1 crosses (11%)11%1
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing556%1
advanced · left wing222%0
advanced · left half-space111%0
byline · left wing111%0

Man City

The question
Which part of the final third does Man City actually cross from?

13 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 1 crosses (8%)8%1advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 1 crosses (8%)8%1advanced left wing: 3 crosses (23%)23%3byline right wing: 1 crosses (8%)8%1byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 1 crosses (8%)8%1byline left wing: 6 crosses (46%)46%6
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing646%0
advanced · left wing323%0
advanced · right wing18%0
advanced · left half-space18%0
byline · right wing18%0
byline · left half-space18%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+1.41Liverpool on-ball value
+1.96Man City on-ball value
+0.0+1.0+2.0HALF TIME+1.41+1.960′15′30′45′60′75′90′
LiverpoolMan CityEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Liverpool — where the value came from
Passes324 actions+0.23
Carries53 actions-0.01
Dribbles17 actions+0.11
Shots13 actions+0.77
Ball wins55 actions+0.32
Man City — where the value came from
Passes594 actions+1.11
Carries153 actions-0.11
Dribbles18 actions+0.27
Shots15 actions+0.52
Ball wins41 actions+0.17
Liverpool — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Jérémy Jacquet25+0.508
Alexis Mac Allister62+0.224
Florian Wirtz42+0.169
Alisson Becker31+0.161
Ryan Gravenberch46+0.137
Bradley Barcola (lowest)38-0.109
Man City — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Jérémy Doku48+0.339
Rayan Cherki104+0.309
Elliot Anderson103+0.293
Josko Gvardiol17+0.217
Enzo Fernández95+0.216
Nico O'Reilly (lowest)43-0.018
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Liverpool

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

4 of 16 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%4/16Araujo13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.5 of 32 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%5/32Becker9 of 25 pass attempts lost here (36%).36%9/25Becker5 of 17 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%5/17Kerkez4 of 23 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%4/23Muñoz6 of 29 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%6/29Allister4 of 27 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%4/27Dijk7 of 49 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%7/49Dijk9 of 36 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%9/36Kerkez5 of 16 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%5/16Wirtz10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.7 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.attacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
16
Failed forward pass
6
Failed take-on
9
Lost in the defensive third
27
Their weakest zone is the left half-space in the defensive third: 36% of 25 pass attempts there are lost (9 times). Separately, 22% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Man City

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

7 of 23 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%7/23Nunes1 of 18 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%1/18Nunes13 of 70 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%13/70Donnarumma0 of 30 pass attempts lost here (0%).0%0/306 of 24 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%6/24O'Reilly4 of 53 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%4/53Cherki8 of 43 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%8/43Dias3 of 72 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%3/72Fernández3 of 65 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%3/65Haaland5 of 63 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%5/63Semenyo5 of 28 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%5/28Ndiaye13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.0 of 15 pass attempts lost here (0%).0%0/159 of 36 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%9/36Semenyo9 of 41 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%9/41Fernándezattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
27
Failed forward pass
19
Failed take-on
8
Lost in the defensive third
27
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 30% of 23 pass attempts there are lost (7 times). Separately, 35% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Liverpool

Not just press intensity, but where the 145 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
13%
Middle third
51%
Own third
36%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 5.0 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 13% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 51% in midfield.

Where they win it back

9111511613191117147363DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

Man City

Not just press intensity, but where the 128 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
10%
Middle third
48%
Own third
41%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.9 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 10% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 48% in midfield.

Where they win it back

462112101713716944DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Liverpool

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Liverpool win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 27 opposition possessions that Liverpool ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
7.1passes
median 4 · before Liverpool win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
24sec
median 14s · 27.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
33%
26%
19%
22%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.5
10s
15–30′
7.7
29s
30–45+′
4.8
13s
45–60′
5.0
13s
60–75′

too few
75–90+′
20.0
71s
average passesaverage seconds

Man City

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Man City win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 24 opposition possessions that Man City ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.3passes
median 3 · before Man City win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
12sec
median 8s · 24.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
38%
33%
21%
8%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
5.6
19s
15–30′
5.2
12s
30–45+′
9.0
30s
45–60′
2.8
5s
60–75′
1.0
2s
75–90+′

too few
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Liverpool — 145 actions, 101 won
Man City — 128 actions, 93 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Liverpool — 70 wins · 3% in the final third, 44% midfield, 53% own third
own third, right: 12 of 70 wins (17%)17%12 winsown third, centre: 13 of 70 wins (19%)19%13 winsown third, left: 12 of 70 wins (17%)17%12 winsmidfield, right: 12 of 70 wins (17%)17%12 winsmidfield, centre: 6 of 70 wins (9%)9%6 winsmidfield, left: 13 of 70 wins (19%)19%13 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 70 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 1 of 70 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 0 of 70 wins (0%)
Highest winsTypeMinx
Ryan Gravenberchball-recovery17′81
Ryan Gravenberchinterception2′69
Ryan Gravenberchball-recovery51′65
Florian Wirtzball-recovery8′65
Ronald Araujointerception17′64
Man City — 55 wins · 4% in the final third, 38% midfield, 58% own third
own third, right: 5 of 55 wins (9%)9%5 winsown third, centre: 18 of 55 wins (33%)33%18 winsown third, left: 9 of 55 wins (16%)16%9 winsmidfield, right: 11 of 55 wins (20%)20%11 winsmidfield, centre: 3 of 55 wins (5%)5%3 winsmidfield, left: 7 of 55 wins (13%)13%7 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 55 wins (2%)2%1 winfinal third, centre: 1 of 55 wins (2%)2%1 winfinal third, left: 0 of 55 wins (0%)
Highest winsTypeMinx
Enzo Fernándezinterception51′72
Enzo Fernándezball-recovery51′69
Erling Haalandtackle71′65
Rayan Cherkiball-recovery44′64
Enzo Fernándezball-recovery71′63
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Liverpool

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Liverpool? 40 opponent progressive passes and 15 shots faced (1.2 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Liverpool)

Right wing
17%
Right half-space
23%
Central
13%
Left half-space
8%
Left wing
38%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (38% of the danger conceded).

Man City

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Man City? 33 opponent progressive passes and 13 shots faced (1.1 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Man City)

Right wing
27%
Right half-space
12%
Central
11%
Left half-space
39%
Left wing
11%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left half-space (39% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Liverpool

Build-up (own third)

safer, less recycling, left-sided

right 24% · centre 37% · left 38%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
115
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+15.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
10%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
23%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.2 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
53% of 53
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
53%
Progression (middle third)

safer, left-sided, trying to break lines

right 29% · centre 27% · left 45%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
202
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
39% of 64
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
55%
Final third

safer, circulating, playing short

right 44% · centre 21% · left 35%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
77
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
-0.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
14%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
24% of 33
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
42%

Man City

Build-up (own third)

safer, slower

right 25% · centre 46% · left 29%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
212
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+8.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
22%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
18%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
58% of 62
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
42%
Progression (middle third)

safer, circulating, left-sided

right 29% · centre 31% · left 40%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
375
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
48% of 71
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
46%
Final third

safer, more recycling, playing short

right 29% · centre 15% · left 56%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
178
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
22%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
30% of 40
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
40%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Liverpool
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Passes324vs 528
Progressive passes33vs 47
Final-third entries31vs 58
Field tilt37%vs 59%
Threat from passing3.71vs 6.71
Man City
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Defensive actions128vs 139
Expected goals1.25vs 1.81
Passes594vs 669
Threat from passing5.15vs 4.61
Final-third entries54vs 58

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Liverpool

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
14%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
52%
Safe / backward
32%
15% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 85% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Man City

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
12%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
47%
Safe / backward
40%
13% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 87% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Liverpool: 5 corners, 2 led to a shot; Man City: 6 corners, 1 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Liverpool

5Corners
2Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.54Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
20%1 corner40%20%20%3 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Man City

6Corners
1Led to a shot
5Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.07Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
17%1 corner33%2 corners33%2 corners17%5 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Liverpool
Man City

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report