Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportPremier League 2026-10-17

Everton v Chelsea

0.491.44expected goals
0.372.17xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (0.49 – 1.44 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Everton
Chelsea
Possession (share of passes)
47.3%52.7%
Duels
4952
Duels won
34.7%53.8%
Aerial duels
3333
Aerial duels won
1320
Successful dribbles
59
Passes
452503
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Everton above the line, Chelsea below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.831.672.50Cole Palmer — save, 0.04 xGJordan Henderson — save, 0.09 xGMerlin Röhl — save, 0.06 xGThierno Barry — save, 0.07 xGJack Grealish — save, 0.04 xGThierno Barry — save, 0.14 xGMoisés Caicedo — post, 0.04 xGPedro Neto — save, 0.03 xGMaxence Lacroix — save, 0.30 xGPedro Neto — goal, 0.14 xGCole Palmer — save, 0.04 xGMorgan Rogers — save, 0.18 xGMorgan Rogers — miss, 0.02 xGCole Palmer — miss, 0.04 xGJoão Pedro — miss, 0.05 xGJoão Pedro — save, 0.07 xGCole Palmer — miss, 0.02 xGJoão Pedro — save, 0.13 xGCole Palmer — miss, 0.07 xGCole Palmer — save, 0.06 xGJarrad Branthwaite — miss, 0.10 xGThierno Barry — save, 0.08 xGJordan Henderson — save, 0.03 xGPedro Neto — goal, 0.08 xG0.491.44Cole Palmer — save, 0.14 xGOTJordan Henderson — save, 0.03 xGOTMerlin Röhl — save, 0.06 xGOTThierno Barry — save, 0.10 xGOTJack Grealish — save, 0.02 xGOTThierno Barry — save, 0.12 xGOTPedro Neto — save, 0.05 xGOTMaxence Lacroix — save, 0.64 xGOTPedro Neto — goal, 0.36 xGOTCole Palmer — save, 0.06 xGOTMorgan Rogers — save, 0.16 xGOTJoão Pedro — save, 0.09 xGOTJoão Pedro — save, 0.05 xGOTCole Palmer — save, 0.15 xGOTThierno Barry — save, 0.07 xGOTJordan Henderson — save, 0.02 xGOTPedro Neto — goal, 0.42 xGOT0.372.170'15'30'45'60'75'90'
EvertonChelseasolid = xG24 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Everton
Chelsea

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Everton or Chelsea got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 2 of 2 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Everton

The question
When Everton has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Everton's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 17.5% of the time on the ball18%Progression: 49.5% of the time on the ball49%Chance creation: 31.3% of the time on the ball31%Attacking transition: 1.7% of the time on the ball49%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up17.5%
Progression49.5%
Chance creation31.3%
Attacking transition1.7%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Everton spends most of its time on the ball (49% of its time on the ball).

Chelsea

The question
When Chelsea has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Chelsea's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 19.3% of the time on the ball19%Progression: 53.5% of the time on the ball53%Chance creation: 26.1% of the time on the ball26%Attacking transition: 1.1% of the time on the ball53%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up19.3%
Progression53.5%
Chance creation26.1%
Attacking transition1.1%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Chelsea spends most of its time on the ball (53% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Everton
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Chelsea
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Everton — 585 touches
Chelsea — 653 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Everton

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Everton actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
452
ACTIONS
2%4%8%4%6%7%9%7%10%17%6%2%2%3%12%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
113
ACTIONS
3%5%7%4%6%10%8%14%11%6%2%22%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left wing of the middle third (15.8% of all actions). 49% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 51% down the two wings — a wing-oriented build. By third: 23% defensive, 49% middle, 27% attacking.

Chelsea

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Chelsea actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
503
ACTIONS
4%4%10%5%2%7%11%14%13%9%5%4%2%3%9%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
110
ACTIONS
3%5%13%6%7%11%12%16%9%7%2%3%2%4%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left half-space of the middle third (13.7% of all actions). 66% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 34% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 25% defensive, 53% middle, 21% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Everton leaned on their left (55%); Chelsea leaned on their left (42%).

Everton
55%Left side19%Middle27%Right sideATTACKING →
L
55%19%27%
R
Chelsea
42%Left side30%Middle29%Right sideATTACKING →
L
42%30%29%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Everton — 38 entries, 63% through the left wing
Left wing: 24 entries (63%)2463%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 2 entries (5%)25%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 2 entries (5%)25%CENTRERight half-space: 3 entries (8%)38%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 7 entries (18%)718%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Chelsea — 43 entries, 33% through the left wing
Left wing: 14 entries (33%)1433%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 2 entries (5%)25%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 5 entries (12%)512%CENTRERight half-space: 8 entries (19%)819%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 14 entries (33%)1433%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Everton

The football question
How does Everton progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

110build-up passes attempted
76%completed
21%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third

Pass types

30CB · 36%
5Long Wide · 6%
1Long Central · 1%
40Wide → FB · 48%
8Central · 10%
CB30 · 36%
left: 20 passes, most from Branthwaite20right: 10 passes, most from Tarkowski10
Long Wide5 · 6%
left: 4 passes, most from Pickford4
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB40 · 48%
left: 25 passes, most from Mykolenko25right: 15 passes, most from Pickford15
Central8 · 10%
right: 5 passes, most from Maitland-Niles5left: 3 passes, most from Garner3
◆ Vision AI Insight
Everton build predominantly down the left, with Pickford as the fulcrum (19 build-up passes). Only 24% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (8×).

Chelsea

The football question
How does Chelsea progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

125build-up passes attempted
73%completed
31%reach the middle third
3%go long into the final third

Pass types

38CB · 42%
11Long Wide · 12%
2Long Central · 2%
29Wide → FB · 32%
11Central · 12%
CB38 · 42%
right: 20 passes, most from Lacroix20left: 18 passes, most from Colwill18
Long Wide11 · 12%
left: 10 passes, most from Penders10
Long Central2 · 2%
right: 2 passes, most from Rogers2
Wide → FB29 · 32%
right: 19 passes, most from Martínez19left: 10 passes, most from Martínez10
Central11 · 12%
left: 7 passes, most from Hato7right: 4 passes, most from Martínez4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Chelsea build predominantly down the left, with Colwill as the fulcrum (21 build-up passes). Only 34% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LHS def → C def (10×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Everton

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 37 progressive passes across 1 match (37.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
19%
Right half-space
11%
Central
14%
Left half-space
11%
Left wing
46%
Progression is left-dominant: 30% right side · 14% central · 57% left.

Who generates it

Vitalii Mykolenko
10 · 27%
Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall
7 · 19%
James Garner
5 · 14%
Jack Grealish
3 · 8%
Jordan Pickford
3 · 8%
Top two — Vitalii Mykolenko & Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall — account for 46% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
37.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
30% reach final third
14% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 70% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 30% of progressive passes reached the final third and 14% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 46% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingsterile
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced

Chelsea

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 40 progressive passes across 1 match (40.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
22%
Right half-space
15%
Central
20%
Left half-space
15%
Left wing
28%
Progression is left-dominant: 38% right side · 20% central · 42% left.

Who generates it

Jordan Henderson
7 · 18%
Pedro Neto
5 · 12%
Emiliano Martínez
5 · 12%
Jorrel Hato
4 · 10%
Josh Acheampong
4 · 10%
Top two — Jordan Henderson & Pedro Neto — account for 30% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
40.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
22% reach final third
20% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 78% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 22% of progressive passes reached the final third and 20% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 30% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacesterile
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Everton

The question
Where do Everton's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

6shots
0.5xG
0.08xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Settled attack: 5 shots (83%)83%5Set piece: 1 shots (17%)17%16SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Settled attack 83% of shots500.430.09
Cross100.080.08
Cut-back200.180.09
Long ball100.060.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.100.10
Set piece 17% of shots100.070.07
Corner100.070.07

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Vitalii Mykolenko20.220
Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall10.060
James Tarkowski10.040

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Thierno Barry30.290
Jarrad Branthwaite10.100
Merlin Röhl10.060
Jack Grealish10.040
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Everton's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.4 of 0.5 xG, 5 of 6 shots), mostly cut-back. 0 of the 6 shots (0%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 1 of the 6 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 0.5 xG (-0.5).

Chelsea

The question
Where do Chelsea's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

18shots
1.4xG
0.08xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 2 shots (11%)11%2Settled attack: 10 shots (56%)56%10Set piece: 6 shots (33%)33%618SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 11% of shots200.200.10
Pass into the box / short pass200.200.10
Settled attack 56% of shots1020.760.08
Cut-back200.270.13
Pass into the box / short pass600.270.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)220.220.11
Set piece 33% of shots600.480.08
Corner500.450.09
Free kick100.030.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Pedro Neto50.400
Cole Palmer30.230
Morgan Rogers20.100

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Maxence Lacroix10.300
Cole Palmer60.280
Pedro Neto30.262
João Pedro30.250
Morgan Rogers20.200
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Chelsea's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.8 of 1.4 xG, 10 of 18 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 2 of the 18 shots (11%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 6 of the 18 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 1.4 xG (+0.6).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Everton

The question
How does Everton deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

17 crosses: 2 found a team-mate (12%), 1 led to a shot (6%). 2 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (100%), 2 led to a shot (100%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Chelsea

The question
How does Chelsea deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

10 crosses: 3 found a team-mate (30%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 5 cut-backs: 3 found a team-mate (60%), 2 led to a shot (40%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Everton

The question
Which part of the final third does Everton actually cross from?

17 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 2 crosses (12%)12%2deep right half-space: 1 crosses (6%)6%1deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 2 crosses (12%)12%2advanced right wing: 1 crosses (6%)6%1advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 6 crosses (35%)35%6byline right wing: 3 crosses (18%)18%3byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 2 crosses (12%)12%2
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · left wing635%0
byline · right wing318%0
deep · right wing212%0
deep · left wing212%0
byline · left wing212%1
deep · right half-space16%0
advanced · right wing16%0

Chelsea

The question
Which part of the final third does Chelsea actually cross from?

10 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (10%)10%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (10%)10%1advanced right wing: 4 crosses (40%)40%4advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (20%)20%2byline right wing: 2 crosses (20%)20%2byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 0 crosses (0%)
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing440%0
advanced · left wing220%0
byline · right wing220%0
deep · right wing110%0
deep · left wing110%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+0.76Everton on-ball value
+1.34Chelsea on-ball value
+0.0+0.7+1.3HALF TIME+0.76+1.340′15′30′45′60′75′90′
EvertonChelseaEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Everton — where the value came from
Passes452 actions+0.46
Carries113 actions-0.01
Dribbles14 actions+0.04
Shots6 actions+0.17
Ball wins46 actions+0.09
Chelsea — where the value came from
Passes503 actions+0.29
Carries110 actions+0.20
Dribbles15 actions-0.25
Shots18 actions+0.98
Ball wins39 actions+0.12
Everton — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Vitalii Mykolenko77+0.283
Jarrad Branthwaite74+0.174
Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall55+0.142
Jordan Pickford45+0.067
Thierno Barry11+0.051
James Garner (lowest)79-0.043
Chelsea — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Pedro Neto56+0.714
João Pedro32+0.181
Maxence Lacroix62+0.167
Emiliano Martínez33+0.101
Morgan Rogers69+0.089
Cole Palmer (lowest)68-0.258
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Everton

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 17 pass attempts lost here (35%).35%6/17Armstrong9 of 38 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%9/38Pickford5 of 18 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%5/18Pickford4 of 27 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%4/27Branthwait12 of 33 pass attempts lost here (36%).36%12/33Maitland-N11 of 39 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%11/39Tarkowski8 of 32 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%8/32Röhl2 of 43 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%2/43Barry9 of 77 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%9/77Mykolenko9 of 29 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%9/29Maitland-N8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.5 of 15 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%5/15Grealish18 of 56 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%18/56Grealishattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
33
Failed forward pass
26
Failed take-on
9
Lost in the defensive third
26
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the middle third: 36% of 33 pass attempts there are lost (12 times). Separately, 33% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Chelsea

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

7 of 18 pass attempts lost here (39%).39%7/18Acheampong6 of 20 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%6/20Lacroix14 of 52 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%14/52Martínez2 of 23 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%2/23Colwill12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.7 of 33 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%7/33Neto3 of 53 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%3/53Colwill9 of 68 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%9/68Caicedo6 of 66 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%6/66Henderson5 of 46 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%5/46Colwill6 of 23 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%6/23Neto3 of 18 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%3/18Palmer10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.7 of 17 pass attempts lost here (41%).41%7/17Rogers10 of 44 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%10/44Rogersattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
26
Failed forward pass
17
Failed take-on
6
Lost in the defensive third
34
Their weakest zone is the left half-space in the attacking third: 41% of 17 pass attempts there are lost (7 times). Separately, 29% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Everton

Not just press intensity, but where the 142 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
16%
Middle third
39%
Own third
44%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.9 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 16% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 39% in midfield.

Where they win it back

1019208691579163855DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

Chelsea

Not just press intensity, but where the 143 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
11%
Middle third
42%
Own third
47%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 5.4 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 11% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 42% in midfield.

Where they win it back

1792171316165158643DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Everton

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Everton win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 29 opposition possessions that Everton ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.6passes
median 2 · before Everton win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
16sec
median 4s · 29.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
55%
17%
7%
21%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
8.7
29s
15–30′
6.2
22s
30–45+′

too few
45–60′
1.8
3s
60–75′
6.0
17s
75–90+′
3.8
7s
average passesaverage seconds

Chelsea

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Chelsea win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 23 opposition possessions that Chelsea ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.2passes
median 4 · before Chelsea win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
11sec
median 5s · 23.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
43%
26%
17%
13%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
2.2
11s
15–30′

too few
30–45+′
6.0
16s
45–60′
2.2
4s
60–75′

too few
75–90+′
4.2
10s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Everton — 142 actions, 102 won
Chelsea — 143 actions, 104 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Everton — 70 wins · 4% in the final third, 37% midfield, 59% own third
own third, right: 14 of 70 wins (20%)20%14 winsown third, centre: 22 of 70 wins (31%)31%22 winsown third, left: 5 of 70 wins (7%)7%5 winsmidfield, right: 10 of 70 wins (14%)14%10 winsmidfield, centre: 2 of 70 wins (3%)3%2 winsmidfield, left: 14 of 70 wins (20%)20%14 winsfinal third, right: 0 of 70 wins (0%)final third, centre: 0 of 70 wins (0%)final third, left: 3 of 70 wins (4%)4%3 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Kiernan Dewsbury-Hallball-recovery11′87
Tyrique Georgeball-recovery86′79
James Garnerinterception80′72
James Garnerball-recovery10′63
Merlin Röhltackle51′62
Chelsea — 68 wins · 1% in the final third, 37% midfield, 62% own third
own third, right: 15 of 68 wins (22%)22%15 winsown third, centre: 14 of 68 wins (21%)21%14 winsown third, left: 13 of 68 wins (19%)19%13 winsmidfield, right: 12 of 68 wins (18%)18%12 winsmidfield, centre: 3 of 68 wins (4%)4%3 winsmidfield, left: 10 of 68 wins (15%)15%10 winsfinal third, right: 0 of 68 wins (0%)final third, centre: 0 of 68 wins (0%)final third, left: 1 of 68 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Jorrel Hatotackle13′74
Jordan Hendersonball-recovery105′63
Pedro Netoball-recovery83′62
Josh Acheampongtackle83′62
Jordan Hendersonball-recovery30′61
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Everton

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Everton? 40 opponent progressive passes and 18 shots faced (1.4 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Everton)

Right wing
22%
Right half-space
13%
Central
22%
Left half-space
18%
Left wing
26%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (26% of the danger conceded).

Chelsea

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Chelsea? 37 opponent progressive passes and 6 shots faced (0.5 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Chelsea)

Right wing
13%
Right half-space
14%
Central
16%
Left half-space
11%
Left wing
45%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (45% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Everton

Build-up (own third)

safer, left-sided

right 22% · centre 41% · left 38%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
133
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+11.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
25%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
50% of 52
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
52%
Progression (middle third)

safer, left-sided, slower

right 29% · centre 22% · left 50%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
284
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
13%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
34% of 70
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
60%
Final third

safer, played in the channels, left-sided

right 29% · centre 7% · left 64%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
162
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.4 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
13% of 38
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
58%

Chelsea

Build-up (own third)

safer, more direct, slower

right 29% · centre 46% · left 25%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
155
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+12.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
30%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
40% of 65
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
62%
Progression (middle third)

safer, shorter passing, playing short

right 27% · centre 36% · left 37%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
334
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
6%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
46% of 65
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
43%
Final third

safer, playing short, circulating

right 37% · centre 13% · left 50%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
139
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
-0.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
6%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
31% of 42
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
38%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Everton
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Expected goals0.49vs 1.21
Defensive actions142vs 163
Pass accuracy78%vs 81%
Threat from passing3.61vs 4.96
Progressive carries43vs 50
Chelsea
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Pass accuracy82%vs 78%
Defensive actions143vs 152
Passes503vs 441
Threat from passing4.09vs 5.23
Expected goals1.44vs 1.14

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Everton

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
12%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
51%
Safe / backward
36%
13% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 87% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Chelsea

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
13%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
46%
Safe / backward
40%
14% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 86% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Everton: 5 corners, 1 led to a shot; Chelsea: 7 corners, 4 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Everton

5Corners
1Led to a shot
6Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.07Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
20%1 corner20%1 corner60%3 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Chelsea

7Corners
4Led to a shot
3Free kicks, their half
6Set-piece shots
0.48Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
14%1 corner14%1 corner43%29%6 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Everton
Chelsea

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report