Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportPremier League 2026-10-17

Fulham v Hull City

1.330.20expected goals
1.650.29xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (1.33 – 0.20 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Fulham
Hull City
Possession (share of passes)
75.8%24.2%
Duels
3953
Duels won
48.7%35.8%
Aerial duels
1919
Aerial duels won
118
Successful dribbles
154
Passes
773247
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Fulham above the line, Hull City below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.631.261.89Saša Lukic — save, 0.05 xGOscar Bobb — save, 0.06 xGJosh King — save, 0.07 xGOscar Bobb — save, 0.03 xGSander Berge — save, 0.06 xGMohamed Belloumi — save, 0.04 xGSaša Lukic — goal, 0.07 xGCalvin Bassey — miss, 0.12 xGOscar Bobb — save, 0.13 xGSaša Lukic — miss, 0.03 xGJosh King — save, 0.05 xGRegan Slater — miss, 0.06 xGJosh King — save, 0.11 xGSaša Lukic — save, 0.15 xGLewie Coyle — miss, 0.05 xGSaša Lukic — miss, 0.03 xGShea Charles — save, 0.02 xGGonzalo García — post, 0.20 xGOscar Bobb — miss, 0.06 xGOscar Bobb — miss, 0.03 xGMohamed Belloumi — miss, 0.03 xGMohamed Belloumi — miss, 0.02 xGTom Cairney — save, 0.07 xG1.330.20Saša Lukic — save, 0.15 xGOTOscar Bobb — save, 0.05 xGOTJosh King — save, 0.28 xGOTOscar Bobb — save, 0.07 xGOTSander Berge — save, 0.30 xGOTMohamed Belloumi — save, 0.29 xGOTSaša Lukic — goal, 0.37 xGOTOscar Bobb — save, 0.04 xGOTJosh King — save, 0.07 xGOTJosh King — save, 0.07 xGOTSaša Lukic — save, 0.10 xGOTShea Charles — save, 0.05 xGOTTom Cairney — save, 0.09 xGOT1.650.290'15'30'45'60'75'90'
FulhamHull Citysolid = xG23 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Fulham
Hull City

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Fulham or Hull City got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 1 of 1 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Fulham

The question
When Fulham has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Fulham's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 28.5% of the time on the ball28%Progression: 41.7% of the time on the ball42%Chance creation: 28.3% of the time on the ball28%Attacking transition: 1.6% of the time on the ball42%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up28.5%
Progression41.7%
Chance creation28.3%
Attacking transition1.6%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Fulham spends most of its time on the ball (42% of its time on the ball).

Hull City

The question
When Hull City has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Hull City's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 35.9% of the time on the ball36%Progression: 38.1% of the time on the ball38%Chance creation: 25.1% of the time on the ball25%Attacking transition: 0.9% of the time on the ball38%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up35.9%
Progression38.1%
Chance creation25.1%
Attacking transition0.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Hull City spends most of its time on the ball (38% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Fulham
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Hull City
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Fulham — 929 touches
Hull City — 399 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Fulham

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Fulham actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
773
ACTIONS
4%5%12%5%3%9%10%10%8%7%9%5%3%4%5%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
198
ACTIONS
3%9%14%4%3%12%14%12%8%7%3%5%1%3%5%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (12.5% of all actions). 64% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 36% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 29% defensive, 46% middle, 25% attacking.

Hull City

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Hull City actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
247
ACTIONS
5%4%18%8%9%7%7%8%9%9%6%3%2%2%3%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
51
ACTIONS
4%22%6%8%4%18%6%10%12%2%4%2%2%2%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (18.5% of all actions). 63% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 37% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 44% defensive, 41% middle, 15% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Fulham
30%Left side25%Middle45%Right sideATTACKING →
L
30%25%45%
R
Hull City
31%Left side30%Middle39%Right sideATTACKING →
L
31%30%39%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Fulham — 52 entries, 25% through the left wing
Left wing: 13 entries (25%)1325%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 9 entries (17%)917%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 5 entries (10%)510%CENTRERight half-space: 13 entries (25%)1325%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 12 entries (23%)1223%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Hull City — 16 entries, 31% through the right wing
Left wing: 1 entries (6%)16%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 2 entries (12%)212%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 4 entries (25%)425%CENTRERight half-space: 4 entries (25%)425%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 5 entries (31%)531%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Fulham

The football question
How does Fulham progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

219build-up passes attempted
93%completed
23%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

76CB · 37%
4Long Wide · 2%
2Long Central · 1%
81Wide → FB · 40%
40Central · 20%
CB76 · 37%
left: 39 passes, most from Bassey39right: 37 passes, most from Affengruber37
Long Wide4 · 2%
left: 2 passes, most from Leno2right: 2 passes, most from Castagne2
Long Central2 · 1%
Wide → FB81 · 40%
left: 42 passes, most from Leno42right: 39 passes, most from Leno39
Central40 · 20%
left: 24 passes, most from Leno24right: 16 passes, most from Leno16
◆ Vision AI Insight
Fulham build predominantly down the left, with Leno as the fulcrum (49 build-up passes). Only 23% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (20×).

Hull City

The football question
How does Hull City progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

110build-up passes attempted
60%completed
32%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

45CB · 68%
7Long Wide · 11%
13Wide → FB · 20%
1Central · 2%
CB45 · 68%
left: 23 passes, most from Egan23right: 22 passes, most from Ajayi22
Long Wide7 · 11%
left: 5 passes, most from Tzolakis5right: 2 passes, most from Tzolakis2
Wide → FB13 · 20%
right: 8 passes, most from Tzolakis8left: 5 passes, most from Tzolakis5
Central1 · 2%
◆ Vision AI Insight
Hull City build predominantly down the left, with Tzolakis as the fulcrum (18 build-up passes). Only 32% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS mid (5×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Fulham

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 74 progressive passes across 1 match (74.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
42%
Right half-space
8%
Central
9%
Left half-space
11%
Left wing
30%
Progression is right-dominant: 50% right side · 9% central · 41% left.

Who generates it

Timothy Castagne
20 · 27%
Saša Lukic
17 · 23%
Antonee Robinson
9 · 12%
Oscar Bobb
6 · 8%
Calvin Bassey
6 · 8%
Top two — Timothy Castagne & Saša Lukic — account for 50% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
74.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
23% reach final third
22% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 77% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 23% of progressive passes reached the final third and 22% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 50% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient

Hull City

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 23 progressive passes across 1 match (23.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
30%
Right half-space
22%
Central
13%
Left half-space
13%
Left wing
22%
Progression is right-dominant: 52% right side · 13% central · 35% left.

Who generates it

Konstantinos Tzolakis
5 · 22%
Semi Ajayi
3 · 13%
Ryan Giles
3 · 13%
Mohamed Belloumi
3 · 13%
Brooke Norton-Cuffy
2 · 9%
Top two — Konstantinos Tzolakis & Semi Ajayi — account for 35% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
23.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
22% reach final third
9% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 78% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 22% of progressive passes reached the final third and 9% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 35% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spaceefficient
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Fulham

The question
Where do Fulham's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

18shots
1.3xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 6 shots (33%)33%6Settled attack: 7 shots (39%)39%7Set piece: 5 shots (28%)28%518SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 33% of shots600.480.08
Cross100.050.05
Pass into the box / short pass500.430.09
Settled attack 39% of shots710.590.08
Cut-back100.150.15
Pass into the box / short pass610.430.07
Set piece 28% of shots500.260.05
Corner400.230.06
Free kick100.030.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Saša Lukic30.320
Gonzalo García20.290
Oscar Bobb30.130
Shea Charles10.110
César Palacios10.070

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Saša Lukic50.331
Oscar Bobb50.310
Josh King30.220
Gonzalo García10.200
Calvin Bassey10.120
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Fulham's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.6 of 1.3 xG, 7 of 18 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 6 of the 18 shots (33%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 5 of the 18 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 1.3 xG (-0.3).

Hull City

The question
Where do Hull City's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

5shots
0.2xG
0.04xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Attacking transition: 1 shots (20%)20%1Settled attack: 3 shots (60%)60%3Set piece: 1 shots (20%)20%15SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 20% of shots100.050.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.050.05
Settled attack 60% of shots300.130.04
Long ball100.030.03
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.100.05
Set piece 20% of shots100.020.02
Free kick100.020.02

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Hidemasa Morita10.030

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Mohamed Belloumi30.090
Regan Slater10.060
Lewie Coyle10.050
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Hull City's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.1 of 0.2 xG, 3 of 5 shots), mostly own creation (carry, dribble, rebound). 1 of the 5 shots (20%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 1 of the 5 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 0.2 xG (-0.2).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Fulham

The question
How does Fulham deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

28 crosses: 12 found a team-mate (43%), 3 led to a shot (11%). 5 cut-backs: 3 found a team-mate (60%), 1 led to a shot (20%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Hull City

The question
How does Hull City deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

8 crosses: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 2 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Fulham

The question
Which part of the final third does Fulham actually cross from?

28 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 4 crosses (14%)14%4deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 4 crosses (14%)14%4advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 4 crosses (14%)14%4byline right wing: 6 crosses (21%)21%6byline right half-space: 1 crosses (4%)4%1byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 1 crosses (4%)4%1byline left wing: 8 crosses (29%)29%8
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing829%0
byline · right wing621%1
deep · right wing414%0
advanced · right wing414%1
advanced · left wing414%1
byline · right half-space14%0
byline · left half-space14%0

Hull City

The question
Which part of the final third does Hull City actually cross from?

8 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 2 crosses (25%)25%2deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 4 crosses (50%)50%4advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 0 crosses (0%)byline right wing: 1 crosses (12%)12%1byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 1 crosses (12%)12%1
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing450%0
deep · right wing225%0
byline · right wing112%0
byline · left wing112%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+1.39Fulham on-ball value
+0.94Hull City on-ball value
+0.0+0.7+1.5HALF TIME+1.39+0.940′15′30′45′60′75′90′
FulhamHull CityEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Fulham — where the value came from
Passes773 actions+0.68
Carries198 actions+0.01
Dribbles26 actions+0.03
Shots18 actions+0.28
Ball wins53 actions+0.39
Hull City — where the value came from
Passes247 actions+0.47
Carries51 actions-0.03
Dribbles10 actions-0.05
Shots5 actions+0.13
Ball wins45 actions+0.42
Fulham — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Saša Lukic99+0.949
Josh King88+0.294
Gonzalo García36+0.256
Tom Cairney30+0.151
Calvin Bassey109+0.079
Sander Berge (lowest)135-0.239
Hull City — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Konstantinos Tzolakis59+0.345
Mohamed Belloumi44+0.295
Hidemasa Morita17+0.070
Tim Iroegbunam13+0.062
John Egan35+0.059
Robinio Vaz (lowest)5-0.037
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Fulham

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

7 of 28 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%7/28Affengrube1 of 38 pass attempts lost here (3%).3%1/38Berge4 of 94 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%4/94Leno0 of 37 pass attempts lost here (0%).0%0/374 of 22 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%4/22Robinson12 of 70 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%12/70Castagne4 of 80 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%4/80Affengrube3 of 78 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%3/78Lukic1 of 61 pass attempts lost here (2%).2%1/61Lukic5 of 55 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%5/55Bassey17 of 73 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%17/73Castagne10 of 37 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%10/37Berge3 of 26 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%3/26Bobb6 of 32 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%6/32King10 of 42 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%10/42Lukicattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
46
Failed forward pass
24
Failed take-on
11
Lost in the defensive third
16
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the attacking third: 27% of 37 pass attempts there are lost (10 times). Separately, 53% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Hull City

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.21 of 44 pass attempts lost here (48%).48%21/44Tzolakis7 of 19 pass attempts lost here (37%).37%7/19Tzolakis6 of 23 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%6/23Norton-Cuf5 of 17 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%5/17Belloumi3 of 17 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%3/17Belloumi8 of 20 pass attempts lost here (40%).40%8/20Thomas5 of 22 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%5/22McBurnie5 of 21 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%5/21Gelhardt14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.7 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.5 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.attacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
22
Failed forward pass
13
Failed take-on
6
Lost in the defensive third
44
Their weakest zone is the central in the defensive third: 48% of 44 pass attempts there are lost (21 times). Separately, 24% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Fulham

Not just press intensity, but where the 136 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
21%
Middle third
34%
Own third
46%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.2 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 21% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 34% in midfield.

Where they win it back

11821166914101264124DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

Hull City

Not just press intensity, but where the 159 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
16%
Middle third
25%
Own third
59%
By intensity this is an moderate press: 9.5 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 16% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 25% in midfield.

Where they win it back

713391619699117DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Fulham

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Fulham win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 32 opposition possessions that Fulham ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
3.2passes
median 3 · before Fulham win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
9sec
median 6s · 32.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
47%
41%
9%
3%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.2
4s
15–30′
3.0
6s
30–45+′
0.7
0s
45–60′
4.0
12s
60–75′
1.9
4s
75–90+′
4.9
18s
average passesaverage seconds

Hull City

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Hull City win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 28 opposition possessions that Hull City ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
9.9passes
median 6 · before Hull City win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
31sec
median 18s · 28.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
25%
18%
29%
29%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
8.3
31s
15–30′
8.8
35s
30–45+′
7.0
19s
45–60′
9.7
30s
60–75′
16.5
47s
75–90+′
7.6
21s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Fulham — 136 actions, 103 won
Hull City — 159 actions, 114 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Fulham — 77 wins · 12% in the final third, 32% midfield, 56% own third
own third, right: 13 of 77 wins (17%)17%13 winsown third, centre: 20 of 77 wins (26%)26%20 winsown third, left: 10 of 77 wins (13%)13%10 winsmidfield, right: 10 of 77 wins (13%)13%10 winsmidfield, centre: 9 of 77 wins (12%)12%9 winsmidfield, left: 6 of 77 wins (8%)8%6 winsfinal third, right: 4 of 77 wins (5%)5%4 winsfinal third, centre: 4 of 77 wins (5%)5%4 winsfinal third, left: 1 of 77 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Oscar Bobbtackle74′77
Oscar Bobbball-recovery55′76
Josh Kingtackle15′72
Shea Charlesball-recovery67′71
Josh Kingball-recovery41′70
Hull City — 80 wins · 9% in the final third, 16% midfield, 75% own third
own third, right: 10 of 80 wins (12%)12%10 winsown third, centre: 27 of 80 wins (34%)34%27 winsown third, left: 23 of 80 wins (29%)29%23 winsmidfield, right: 4 of 80 wins (5%)5%4 winsmidfield, centre: 5 of 80 wins (6%)6%5 winsmidfield, left: 4 of 80 wins (5%)5%4 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 80 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 4 of 80 wins (5%)5%4 winsfinal third, left: 2 of 80 wins (2%)2%2 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Sorba Thomasball-recovery62′74
Hidemasa Moritaball-recovery90′72
Hidemasa Moritaball-recovery81′72
Joe Gelhardtball-recovery87′72
Sorba Thomastackle62′70
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Fulham

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Fulham? 23 opponent progressive passes and 5 shots faced (0.2 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Fulham)

Right wing
26%
Right half-space
34%
Central
13%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
17%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right half-space (34% of the danger conceded).

Hull City

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Hull City? 74 opponent progressive passes and 18 shots faced (1.3 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Hull City)

Right wing
32%
Right half-space
12%
Central
10%
Left half-space
17%
Left wing
30%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (32% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Fulham

Build-up (own third)

safer, kept on the floor, playing short

right 25% · centre 51% · left 23%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
286
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+5.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
5%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
67% of 61
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
31%
Progression (middle third)

safer

right 40% · centre 33% · left 27%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
456
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
6%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.4 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
50% of 72
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
42%
Final third

safer, kept on the floor, right-sided

right 49% · centre 18% · left 33%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
255
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
13%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
5%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
29% of 52
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
54%

Hull City

Build-up (own third)

safer, longer passing, trying to break lines

right 18% · centre 50% · left 32%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
133
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+17.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
36%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
40% of 65
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
60%
Progression (middle third)

safer, longer passing, slower

right 35% · centre 27% · left 38%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
124
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
19%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
31% of 49
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
59%
Final third

safer, slower, trying to break lines

right 47% · centre 29% · left 24%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
51
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
13%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.5 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
18% of 22
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
55%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Fulham
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Progressive passes74vs 42
Field tilt80%vs 50%
Threat from passing7.99vs 4.89
PPDA3.2vs 5.9
Passes773vs 592
Hull City
compared with their other 7 matches this season
PPDA9.5vs 6.1
Threat from passing2.62vs 4.68
Final-third entries16vs 30
Expected goals0.20vs 1.16
Pass accuracy63%vs 69%

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Fulham

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
14%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
45%
Safe / backward
39%
16% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 84% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Hull City

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
13%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
53%
Safe / backward
32%
15% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 85% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Fulham: 10 corners, 4 led to a shot; Hull City: 2 corners, 0 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Fulham

10Corners
4Led to a shot
2Free kicks, their half
5Set-piece shots
0.26Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
10%1 corner10%10%1 corner20%2 corners10%20%20%5 from the left flag5 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Hull City

2Corners
0Led to a shot
1Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.02Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
100%0 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Fulham
Hull City

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report