Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportPremier League 2026-10-24

Aston Villa v Man City

0.581.49expected goals
0.492.38xG on target (xGOT)

Aston Villa won the match; Man City won the chances (0.58 – 1.49 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Aston Villa
Man City
Possession (share of passes)
36.8%63.2%
Duels
6735
Duels won
31.3%54.3%
Aerial duels
1717
Aerial duels won
89
Successful dribbles
519
Passes
337580
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Aston Villa above the line, Man City below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.911.832.74Ian Maatsen — miss, 0.04 xGAlysson — save, 0.06 xGNicolas Jackson — goal, 0.09 xGEnzo Fernández — save, 0.05 xGIliman Ndiaye — save, 0.04 xGNicolas Jackson — miss, 0.06 xGRayan Cherki — save, 0.13 xGAbdukodir Khusanov — save, 0.04 xGIliman Ndiaye — post, 0.07 xGJohan Manzambi — miss, 0.03 xGJérémy Doku — save, 0.06 xGAlysson — save, 0.11 xGIan Maatsen — save, 0.09 xGErling Haaland — goal, 0.22 xGJosko Gvardiol — save, 0.13 xGJérémy Doku — miss, 0.09 xGNicolas Jackson — goal, 0.09 xGJosko Gvardiol — miss, 0.07 xGJosko Gvardiol — save, 0.28 xGPhil Foden — save, 0.05 xGErling Haaland — save, 0.11 xGJérémy Doku — miss, 0.06 xGErling Haaland — save, 0.10 xG0.581.49Alysson — save, 0.03 xGOTNicolas Jackson — goal, 0.13 xGOTEnzo Fernández — save, 0.40 xGOTIliman Ndiaye — save, 0.13 xGOTRayan Cherki — save, 0.13 xGOTAbdukodir Khusanov — save, 0.15 xGOTJérémy Doku — save, 0.05 xGOTAlysson — save, 0.07 xGOTIan Maatsen — save, 0.22 xGOTErling Haaland — goal, 0.50 xGOTJosko Gvardiol — save, 0.08 xGOTNicolas Jackson — goal, 0.06 xGOTJosko Gvardiol — save, 0.18 xGOTPhil Foden — save, 0.12 xGOTErling Haaland — save, 0.19 xGOTErling Haaland — save, 0.45 xGOT0.492.380'15'30'45'60'75'90'
Aston VillaMan Citysolid = xG23 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Aston Villa
Man City

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Aston Villa or Man City got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 3 of 3 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Aston Villa

The question
When Aston Villa has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Aston Villa's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 49.7% of the time on the ball50%Progression: 33.3% of the time on the ball33%Chance creation: 15.1% of the time on the ball15%Attacking transition: 1.9% of the time on the ball50%BUILD-UP
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up49.7%
Progression33.3%
Chance creation15.1%
Attacking transition1.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Build-up is where Aston Villa spends most of its time on the ball (50% of its time on the ball).

Man City

The question
When Man City has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Man City's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 17.3% of the time on the ball17%Progression: 45.3% of the time on the ball45%Chance creation: 35.4% of the time on the ball35%Attacking transition: 1.9% of the time on the ball45%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up17.3%
Progression45.3%
Chance creation35.4%
Attacking transition1.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Man City spends most of its time on the ball (45% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Aston Villa
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Man City
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Aston Villa — 497 touches
Man City — 756 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Aston Villa

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Aston Villa actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
337
ACTIONS
8%7%21%9%6%6%7%8%8%7%2%2%1%7%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
80
ACTIONS
10%8%20%16%6%5%5%8%5%6%4%1%2%4%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (20.9% of all actions). 65% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 35% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 54% defensive, 34% middle, 12% attacking.

Man City

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Man City actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
580
ACTIONS
1%1%7%4%4%12%10%13%10%6%8%6%4%7%7%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
168
ACTIONS
2%2%4%6%2%11%8%12%14%8%12%4%1%6%8%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (12.8% of all actions). 61% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 39% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 17% defensive, 51% middle, 31% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Aston Villa
45%Left side17%Middle38%Right sideATTACKING →
L
45%17%38%
R
Man City
34%Left side24%Middle42%Right sideATTACKING →
L
34%24%42%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Aston Villa — 17 entries, 29% through the left wing
Left wing: 5 entries (29%)529%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 3 entries (18%)318%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 3 entries (18%)318%CENTRERight half-space: 2 entries (12%)212%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 4 entries (24%)424%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Man City — 51 entries, 57% through the right wing
Left wing: 12 entries (24%)1224%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 5 entries (10%)510%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 2 entries (4%)24%CENTRERight half-space: 3 entries (6%)36%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 29 entries (57%)2957%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Aston Villa

The football question
How does Aston Villa progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

177build-up passes attempted
81%completed
22%reach the middle third
3%go long into the final third

Pass types

74CB · 51%
8Long Wide · 6%
51Wide → FB · 35%
11Central · 8%
CB74 · 51%
right: 42 passes, most from Lindelöf42left: 32 passes, most from Torres32
Long Wide8 · 6%
left: 6 passes, most from Suzuki6right: 2 passes, most from Gomes2
Wide → FB51 · 35%
left: 28 passes, most from Suzuki28right: 23 passes, most from Kamara23
Central11 · 8%
right: 8 passes, most from Suzuki8left: 3 passes, most from Kamara3
◆ Vision AI Insight
Aston Villa build predominantly down the right, with Torres as the fulcrum (36 build-up passes). Only 25% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (14×).

Man City

The football question
How does Man City progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

100build-up passes attempted
89%completed
21%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

39CB · 44%
5Long Wide · 6%
1Long Central · 1%
31Wide → FB · 35%
13Central · 15%
CB39 · 44%
left: 24 passes, most from Dias24right: 15 passes, most from Dias15
Long Wide5 · 6%
right: 3 passes, most from Fernández3left: 2 passes, most from Donnarumma2
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB31 · 35%
left: 24 passes, most from Donnarumma24right: 7 passes, most from Donnarumma7
Central13 · 15%
left: 9 passes, most from Donnarumma9right: 4 passes, most from Anderson4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Man City build predominantly down the left, with Dias as the fulcrum (27 build-up passes). Only 22% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (11×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Aston Villa

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 22 progressive passes across 1 match (22.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
27%
Right half-space
5%
Central
9%
Left half-space
27%
Left wing
32%
Progression is left-dominant: 32% right side · 9% central · 59% left.

Who generates it

Pau Torres
4 · 18%
John McGinn
4 · 18%
Ian Maatsen
3 · 14%
Zion Suzuki
3 · 14%
Victor Lindelöf
3 · 14%
Top two — Pau Torres & John McGinn — account for 36% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
22.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
36% reach final third
23% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 64% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 36% of progressive passes reached the final third and 23% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 36% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralbalanced
Left half-spaceefficient
Left wingbalanced

Man City

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 31 progressive passes across 1 match (31.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
39%
Right half-space
6%
Central
13%
Left half-space
16%
Left wing
26%
Progression is right-dominant: 45% right side · 13% central · 42% left.

Who generates it

Enzo Fernández
6 · 19%
Jérémy Doku
5 · 16%
Ryan McAidoo
4 · 13%
Iliman Ndiaye
3 · 10%
Rúben Dias
2 · 6%
Top two — Enzo Fernández & Jérémy Doku — account for 35% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
31.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
10% reach final third
55% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 90% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 10% of progressive passes reached the final third and 55% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 35% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Aston Villa

The question
Where do Aston Villa's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

8shots
0.6xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (38%)38%3Settled attack: 2 shots (25%)25%2Set piece: 3 shots (38%)38%38SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 38% of shots310.250.08
Cross110.090.09
Pass into the box / short pass100.090.09
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.060.06
Settled attack 25% of shots210.200.10
Cut-back110.090.09
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.110.11
Set piece 38% of shots300.140.05
Corner200.100.05
Free kick100.030.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
John McGinn20.181
Ibrahim Mbaye10.091

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Nicolas Jackson30.242
Alysson20.170
Ian Maatsen20.130
Johan Manzambi10.030
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Aston Villa's chances, by xG, is attacking transition (0.2 of 0.6 xG, 3 of 8 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 3 of the 8 shots (38%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 8 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 0.6 xG (+1.4).

Man City

The question
Where do Man City's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

15shots
1.5xG
0.10xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (20%)20%3Settled attack: 9 shots (60%)60%9Set piece: 3 shots (20%)20%315SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 20% of shots300.260.09
Pass into the box / short pass200.170.08
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.090.09
Settled attack 60% of shots911.080.12
Cross100.130.13
Cut-back200.240.12
Pass into the box / short pass510.420.08
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.280.28
Set piece 20% of shots300.150.05
Corner300.150.05

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Jérémy Doku20.270
Iliman Ndiaye10.221
Elliot Anderson20.160
Phil Foden10.110
Rayan Cherki10.070

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Josko Gvardiol30.480
Erling Haaland30.421
Jérémy Doku30.210
Rayan Cherki10.130
Iliman Ndiaye20.110
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Man City's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.1 of 1.5 xG, 9 of 15 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 3 of the 15 shots (20%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 15 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 1.5 xG (-0.5).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Aston Villa

The question
How does Aston Villa deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

9 crosses: 3 found a team-mate (33%), 2 led to a shot (22%). 2 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (50%), 1 led to a shot (50%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Man City

The question
How does Man City deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

15 crosses: 11 found a team-mate (73%), 1 led to a shot (7%). 9 cut-backs: 5 found a team-mate (56%), 3 led to a shot (33%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Aston Villa

The question
Which part of the final third does Aston Villa actually cross from?

9 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (11%)11%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 2 crosses (22%)22%2advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 3 crosses (33%)33%3byline right wing: 0 crosses (0%)byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 3 crosses (33%)33%3
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · left wing333%1
byline · left wing333%1
advanced · right wing222%0
deep · right wing111%0

Man City

The question
Which part of the final third does Man City actually cross from?

15 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (7%)7%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 1 crosses (7%)7%1advanced left wing: 4 crosses (27%)27%4byline right wing: 4 crosses (27%)27%4byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 5 crosses (33%)33%5
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing533%0
advanced · left wing427%0
byline · right wing427%0
deep · right wing17%0
advanced · left half-space17%1

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+0.93Aston Villa on-ball value
+1.51Man City on-ball value
+0.0+0.8+1.5HALF TIME+0.93+1.510′15′30′45′60′75′90′
Aston VillaMan CityEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Aston Villa — where the value came from
Passes337 actions+0.38
Carries80 actions+0.03
Dribbles18 actions-0.02
Shots8 actions+0.28
Ball wins52 actions+0.26
Man City — where the value came from
Passes580 actions+0.23
Carries168 actions+0.06
Dribbles45 actions+0.24
Shots15 actions+0.84
Ball wins53 actions+0.15
Aston Villa — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Nicolas Jackson34+0.229
Alysson18+0.191
John McGinn24+0.181
Zion Suzuki60+0.172
Ian Maatsen53+0.125
Johan Manzambi (lowest)16-0.065
Man City — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Jérémy Doku84+0.388
Iliman Ndiaye65+0.377
Enzo Fernández114+0.257
Josko Gvardiol72+0.207
Erling Haaland14+0.154
Phil Foden (lowest)34-0.113
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Aston Villa

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

5 of 28 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%5/28Lindelöf2 of 25 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%2/25Lindelöf14 of 71 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%14/71Suzuki2 of 32 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%2/32Jackson10 of 21 pass attempts lost here (48%).48%10/21Torres7 of 19 pass attempts lost here (37%).37%7/19Alysson5 of 23 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%5/23McGinn1 of 28 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%1/28McGinn5 of 27 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%5/27Torres5 of 22 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%5/22Maatsen6 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 22 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%6/22Kamaraattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
13
Failed forward pass
10
Failed take-on
13
Lost in the defensive third
33
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 48% of 21 pass attempts there are lost (10 times). Separately, 19% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Man City

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

6 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.0 of 43 pass attempts lost here (0%).0%0/431 of 24 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%1/24Guéhi10 of 21 pass attempts lost here (48%).48%10/21Dias14 of 70 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%14/70Lewis3 of 56 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%3/56Cherki4 of 75 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%4/75Haaland2 of 60 pass attempts lost here (3%).3%2/60Gvardiol2 of 35 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%2/35Gvardiol5 of 45 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%5/45Ndiaye11 of 36 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%11/36Ndiaye2 of 23 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%2/23Doku11 of 41 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%11/41Doku6 of 39 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%6/39Fernándezattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
35
Failed forward pass
16
Failed take-on
26
Lost in the defensive third
11
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 48% of 21 pass attempts there are lost (10 times). Separately, 49% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Aston Villa

Not just press intensity, but where the 172 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
12%
Middle third
37%
Own third
51%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 5.9 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 12% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 37% in midfield.

Where they win it back

122530714151361020955DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

Man City

Not just press intensity, but where the 136 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
13%
Middle third
58%
Own third
29%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.7 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 13% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 58% in midfield.

Where they win it back

109578211771618393DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Aston Villa

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Aston Villa win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 27 opposition possessions that Aston Villa ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
6.7passes
median 3 · before Aston Villa win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
22sec
median 7s · 27.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
44%
7%
22%
26%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
9.2
34s
15–30′
5.8
16s
30–45+′

too few
45–60′
7.0
21s
60–75′
5.4
14s
75–90+′
7.4
28s
average passesaverage seconds

Man City

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Man City win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 29 opposition possessions that Man City ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.1passes
median 4 · before Man City win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
17sec
median 11s · 29.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
45%
14%
24%
17%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.3
12s
15–30′
10.6
35s
30–45+′
5.0
26s
45–60′
5.8
16s
60–75′
4.0
9s
75–90+′
2.3
6s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Aston Villa — 172 actions, 105 won
Man City — 136 actions, 103 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Aston Villa — 74 wins · 11% in the final third, 27% midfield, 62% own third
own third, right: 17 of 74 wins (23%)23%17 winsown third, centre: 22 of 74 wins (30%)30%22 winsown third, left: 7 of 74 wins (9%)9%7 winsmidfield, right: 5 of 74 wins (7%)7%5 winsmidfield, centre: 3 of 74 wins (4%)4%3 winsmidfield, left: 12 of 74 wins (16%)16%12 winsfinal third, right: 4 of 74 wins (5%)5%4 winsfinal third, centre: 0 of 74 wins (0%)final third, left: 4 of 74 wins (5%)5%4 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Nicolas Jacksonball-recovery5′88
Ian Maatsentackle25′81
Matty Cashtackle39′76
Boubacar Kamarainterception26′70
Matty Cashinterception9′70
Man City — 68 wins · 4% in the final third, 62% midfield, 34% own third
own third, right: 6 of 68 wins (9%)9%6 winsown third, centre: 6 of 68 wins (9%)9%6 winsown third, left: 11 of 68 wins (16%)16%11 winsmidfield, right: 25 of 68 wins (37%)37%25 winsmidfield, centre: 5 of 68 wins (7%)7%5 winsmidfield, left: 12 of 68 wins (18%)18%12 winsfinal third, right: 2 of 68 wins (3%)3%2 winsfinal third, centre: 0 of 68 wins (0%)final third, left: 1 of 68 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Abdukodir Khusanovball-recovery82′69
Jérémy Dokuball-recovery40′68
Elliot Andersontackle14′67
Iliman Ndiayeball-recovery63′66
Josko Gvardioltackle71′65
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Aston Villa

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Aston Villa? 31 opponent progressive passes and 15 shots faced (1.5 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Aston Villa)

Right wing
38%
Right half-space
4%
Central
9%
Left half-space
16%
Left wing
34%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (38% of the danger conceded).

Man City

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Man City? 22 opponent progressive passes and 8 shots faced (0.6 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Man City)

Right wing
31%
Right half-space
0%
Central
13%
Left half-space
29%
Left wing
28%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (31% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Aston Villa

Build-up (own third)

safer, more recycling

right 29% · centre 46% · left 25%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
228
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+10.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
23%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
53% of 62
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
52%
Progression (middle third)

safer, more recycling, circulating

right 33% · centre 32% · left 35%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
149
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
12%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
27% of 49
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
47%
Final third

safer, left-sided, more direct

right 29% · centre 9% · left 62%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
58
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
17%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.4 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
21% of 24
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
58%

Man City

Build-up (own third)

left-sided, safer, playing short

right 13% · centre 43% · left 43%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
129
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
22%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
15%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
74% of 31
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
32%
Progression (middle third)

safer, playing short, shorter passing

right 40% · centre 31% · left 29%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
397
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
5%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
55% of 69
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
39%
Final third

safer, played inside, narrow, central

right 42% · centre 17% · left 41%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
267
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
22%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
28% of 47
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
57%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Aston Villa
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Progressive passes22vs 38
Final-third entries17vs 38
Field tilt23%vs 42%
Expected goals0.58vs 1.10
Threat from passing3.19vs 4.80
Man City
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Progressive passes31vs 43
Field tilt77%vs 65%
Passes580vs 671
Expected goals1.49vs 1.78
Final-third entries51vs 59

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Aston Villa

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
12%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
47%
Safe / backward
41%
12% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 88% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Man City

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
10%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
49%
Safe / backward
41%
10% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 90% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Aston Villa: 4 corners, 2 led to a shot; Man City: 7 corners, 2 led to a shot.

Aston Villa

4Corners
2Led to a shot
9Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.14Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
25%1 corner25%1 corner50%2 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Man City

7Corners
2Led to a shot
9Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.15Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
14%1 corner29%29%2 corners14%14%5 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Aston Villa
Man City

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report