Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportPremier League 2026-10-25

Sunderland v Leeds

0.980.70expected goals
1.040.84xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (0.98 – 0.70 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Sunderland
Leeds
Possession (share of passes)
50.5%49.5%
Duels
4444
Duels won
34.1%36.4%
Aerial duels
2323
Aerial duels won
1211
Successful dribbles
610
Passes
425417
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Sunderland above the line, Leeds below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.400.801.20Jayden Bogle — miss, 0.06 xGJaka Bijol — save, 0.03 xGBrian Brobbey — save, 0.07 xGLuke O'Nien — miss, 0.05 xGNordi Mukiele — miss, 0.02 xGBrian Brobbey — save, 0.20 xGEnzo Le Fée — save, 0.02 xGChris Rigg — save, 0.05 xGGabriel Gudmundsson — miss, 0.05 xGTarik Muharemovic — save, 0.07 xGEnzo Le Fée — save, 0.05 xGNilson Angulo — save, 0.04 xGChris Rigg — save, 0.06 xGJayden Bogle — save, 0.08 xGJames Justin — miss, 0.03 xGNilson Angulo — save, 0.07 xGLuke O'Nien — miss, 0.07 xGLuke O'Nien — miss, 0.08 xGNilson Angulo — save, 0.09 xGAo Tanaka — save, 0.07 xGChemsdine Talbi — save, 0.08 xGTymur Tutierov — save, 0.04 xGSean Longstaff — save, 0.04 xGNoah Okafor — save, 0.05 xGSean Longstaff — save, 0.16 xGNoah Okafor — miss, 0.06 xG0.980.70Jaka Bijol — save, 0.18 xGOTBrian Brobbey — save, 0.13 xGOTBrian Brobbey — save, 0.07 xGOTEnzo Le Fée — save, 0.05 xGOTChris Rigg — save, 0.05 xGOTTarik Muharemovic — save, 0.06 xGOTEnzo Le Fée — save, 0.03 xGOTNilson Angulo — save, 0.19 xGOTChris Rigg — save, 0.10 xGOTJayden Bogle — save, 0.04 xGOTNilson Angulo — save, 0.04 xGOTNilson Angulo — save, 0.17 xGOTAo Tanaka — save, 0.18 xGOTChemsdine Talbi — save, 0.04 xGOTTymur Tutierov — save, 0.18 xGOTSean Longstaff — save, 0.18 xGOTNoah Okafor — save, 0.08 xGOTSean Longstaff — save, 0.13 xGOT1.040.840'15'30'45'60'75'90'
SunderlandLeedssolid = xG26 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Sunderland
Leeds
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Sunderland

The question
When Sunderland has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Sunderland's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 29.0% of the time on the ball29%Progression: 44.6% of the time on the ball45%Chance creation: 23.8% of the time on the ball24%Attacking transition: 2.7% of the time on the ball45%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up29.0%
Progression44.6%
Chance creation23.8%
Attacking transition2.7%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Sunderland spends most of its time on the ball (45% of its time on the ball).

Leeds

The question
When Leeds has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Leeds's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 33.2% of the time on the ball33%Progression: 42.3% of the time on the ball42%Chance creation: 23.9% of the time on the ball24%Attacking transition: 0.5% of the time on the ball42%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up33.2%
Progression42.3%
Chance creation23.9%
Attacking transition0.5%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Leeds spends most of its time on the ball (42% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Sunderland
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Leeds
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Sunderland — 598 touches
Leeds — 586 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Sunderland

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Sunderland actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
425
ACTIONS
5%6%9%5%7%8%9%8%9%14%7%2%3%5%4%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
77
ACTIONS
5%5%8%16%1%6%16%6%8%5%5%1%3%3%12%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left wing of the middle third (12.4% of all actions). 57% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 43% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 31% defensive, 47% middle, 22% attacking.

Leeds

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Leeds actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
417
ACTIONS
4%5%12%8%8%7%10%9%8%9%6%4%4%1%5%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
76
ACTIONS
1%11%17%3%9%11%8%9%9%8%7%1%3%4%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (12.6% of all actions). 60% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 40% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 37% defensive, 44% middle, 19% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Sunderland
40%Left side24%Middle36%Right sideATTACKING →
L
40%24%36%
R
Leeds
31%Left side30%Middle38%Right sideATTACKING →
L
31%30%38%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Sunderland — 34 entries, 35% through the left wing
Left wing: 12 entries (35%)1235%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 5 entries (15%)515%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 3 entries (9%)39%CENTRERight half-space: 5 entries (15%)515%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 9 entries (26%)926%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Leeds — 38 entries, 42% through the right wing
Left wing: 8 entries (21%)821%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 4 entries (11%)411%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 7 entries (18%)718%CENTRERight half-space: 3 entries (8%)38%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 16 entries (42%)1642%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Sunderland

The football question
How does Sunderland progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

131build-up passes attempted
68%completed
29%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

42CB · 47%
3Long Wide · 3%
36Wide → FB · 40%
8Central · 9%
CB42 · 47%
left: 27 passes, most from Mandava27right: 15 passes, most from Mukiele15
Long Wide3 · 3%
right: 2 passes, most from Hume2
Wide → FB36 · 40%
right: 20 passes, most from Hume20left: 16 passes, most from Xhaka16
Central8 · 9%
left: 5 passes, most from Roefs5right: 3 passes, most from Hume3
◆ Vision AI Insight
Sunderland build predominantly down the left, with Roefs as the fulcrum (15 build-up passes). Only 29% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LHS def → C def (6×).

Leeds

The football question
How does Leeds progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

151build-up passes attempted
75%completed
31%reach the middle third
6%go long into the final third

Pass types

47CB · 41%
16Long Wide · 14%
4Long Central · 4%
39Wide → FB · 34%
8Central · 7%
CB47 · 41%
left: 30 passes, most from Muharemovic30right: 17 passes, most from Bijol17
Long Wide16 · 14%
left: 8 passes, most from Trafford8right: 8 passes, most from Trafford8
Long Central4 · 4%
left: 3 passes, most from Trafford3
Wide → FB39 · 34%
left: 24 passes, most from Gudmundsson24right: 15 passes, most from Ampadu15
Central8 · 7%
right: 5 passes, most from Ampadu5left: 3 passes, most from Trafford3
◆ Vision AI Insight
Leeds build predominantly down the left, with Muharemovic as the fulcrum (30 build-up passes). Only 37% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LW def (8×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Sunderland

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 33 progressive passes across 1 match (33.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
36%
Right half-space
21%
Central
0%
Left half-space
12%
Left wing
30%
Progression is right-dominant: 58% right side · 0% central · 42% left.

Who generates it

Trai Hume
7 · 21%
Granit Xhaka
6 · 18%
Enzo Le Fée
5 · 15%
Chris Rigg
3 · 9%
Nordi Mukiele
3 · 9%
Top two — Trai Hume & Granit Xhaka — account for 39% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
33.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
27% reach final third
24% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 73% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 27% of progressive passes reached the final third and 24% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 39% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spaceefficient
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced

Leeds

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 47 progressive passes across 1 match (47.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
30%
Right half-space
13%
Central
23%
Left half-space
17%
Left wing
17%
Progression is right-dominant: 43% right side · 23% central · 34% left.

Who generates it

James Trafford
11 · 23%
Jayden Bogle
8 · 17%
Ao Tanaka
6 · 13%
Harry Wilson
5 · 11%
Tarik Muharemovic
5 · 11%
Top two — James Trafford & Jayden Bogle — account for 40% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
47.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
28% reach final third
17% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 72% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 28% of progressive passes reached the final third and 17% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 40% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralefficient
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingsterile
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Sunderland

The question
Where do Sunderland's chances actually come from?

Every shot traced back to its source: set pieces, or the pass that set it up (a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box) or no pass at all (the player created it himself).

15shots
1.0xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Cross: 1 shots (7%)7%1Pass into the box / short pass: 7 shots (47%)47%7Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound): 3 shots (20%)20%3Corner: 3 shots (20%)20%3Free kick: 1 shots (7%)7%115SHOTS
Source of the shotShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Cross100.070.07
Pass into the box / short pass700.350.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)300.330.11
Corner300.210.07
Free kick100.020.02

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Enzo Le Fée30.200
Granit Xhaka20.100
Noah Sadiki20.070
Chris Rigg10.050

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Brian Brobbey20.270
Nilson Angulo30.200
Luke O'Nien30.190
Chris Rigg20.110
Chemsdine Talbi10.080
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Sunderland's chances, by xG, is pass into the box / short pass (0.3 of 1.0 xG, 7 of 15 shots). 4 of the 15 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 1.0 xG (-1.0).

Leeds

The question
Where do Leeds's chances actually come from?

Every shot traced back to its source: set pieces, or the pass that set it up (a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box) or no pass at all (the player created it himself).

11shots
0.7xG
0.06xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Cross: 1 shots (9%)9%1Cut-back: 2 shots (18%)18%2Pass into the box / short pass: 3 shots (27%)27%3Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound): 3 shots (27%)27%3Corner: 2 shots (18%)18%211SHOTS
Source of the shotShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Cross100.030.03
Cut-back200.220.11
Pass into the box / short pass300.140.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)300.190.06
Corner200.120.06

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Noah Okafor10.160
Jayden Bogle10.070
James Justin10.060
Ethan Ampadu10.040
Harry Wilson10.030

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Sean Longstaff20.200
Jayden Bogle20.140
Noah Okafor20.110
Tarik Muharemovic10.070
Ao Tanaka10.070
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Leeds's chances, by xG, is cut-back (0.2 of 0.7 xG, 2 of 11 shots). 2 of the 11 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 0.7 xG (-0.7).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Sunderland

The question
How does Sunderland deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

12 crosses: 2 found a team-mate (17%), 1 led to a shot (8%). 0 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (—), 0 led to a shot (—).

Leeds

The question
How does Leeds deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

15 crosses: 3 found a team-mate (20%), 1 led to a shot (7%). 6 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (33%), 2 led to a shot (33%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Sunderland

The question
Which part of the final third does Sunderland actually cross from?

12 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (8%)8%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (8%)8%1advanced right wing: 2 crosses (17%)17%2advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 1 crosses (8%)8%1byline right wing: 6 crosses (50%)50%6byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 1 crosses (8%)8%1
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing650%0
advanced · right wing217%0
deep · right wing18%0
deep · left wing18%0
advanced · left wing18%1
byline · left wing18%0

Leeds

The question
Which part of the final third does Leeds actually cross from?

15 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (7%)7%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 6 crosses (40%)40%6advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (13%)13%2byline right wing: 4 crosses (27%)27%4byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 2 crosses (13%)13%2
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing640%1
byline · right wing427%0
advanced · left wing213%0
byline · left wing213%0
deep · right wing17%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+0.85Sunderland on-ball value
+0.47Leeds on-ball value
+0.0+0.5+0.9HALF TIME+0.85+0.470′15′30′45′60′75′90′
SunderlandLeedsEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Sunderland — where the value came from
Passes425 actions+0.17
Carries77 actions+0.08
Dribbles16 actions-0.11
Shots15 actions+0.45
Ball wins48 actions+0.26
Leeds — where the value came from
Passes417 actions-0.05
Carries76 actions-0.00
Dribbles17 actions-0.04
Shots11 actions+0.32
Ball wins39 actions+0.24
Sunderland — most valuable players
PlayerActionsOBV
Trai Hume63+0.181
Brian Brobbey9+0.167
Nilson Angulo38+0.131
Luke O'Nien58+0.097
Nordi Mukiele39+0.076
Noah Sadiki (lowest)51-0.026
Leeds — most valuable players
PlayerActionsOBV
Ethan Ampadu76+0.318
Jayden Bogle52+0.279
Sean Longstaff5+0.181
James Trafford52+0.142
Jaka Bijol62+0.083
Lukas Nmecha (lowest)2-0.156
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Sunderland

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

8 of 20 pass attempts lost here (40%).40%8/20Hume6 of 24 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%6/24O'Nien11 of 37 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%11/37Roefs6 of 21 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%6/21Roefs11 of 29 pass attempts lost here (38%).38%11/29Mandava11 of 34 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%11/34Hume9 of 37 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%9/37Sadiki12 of 35 pass attempts lost here (34%).34%12/35Sadiki9 of 40 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%9/40Xhaka13 of 58 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%13/58Mandava14 of 28 pass attempts lost here (50%).50%14/28Hume10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 23 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%6/23Xhaka1 of 18 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%1/18Talbiattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
26
Failed forward pass
18
Failed take-on
10
Lost in the defensive third
42
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the attacking third: 50% of 28 pass attempts there are lost (14 times). Separately, 21% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Leeds

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

8 of 16 pass attempts lost here (50%).50%8/16Bijol5 of 21 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%5/21Ampadu11 of 49 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%11/49Trafford7 of 32 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%7/32Trafford6 of 33 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%6/33Gudmundsso9 of 31 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%9/31Justin5 of 42 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%5/42Bogle11 of 38 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%11/38Stach9 of 32 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%9/32Ampadu13 of 39 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%13/39Okafor12 of 26 pass attempts lost here (46%).46%12/26Justin9 of 15 pass attempts lost here (60%).60%9/15Bogle5 of 16 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%5/16Aaronson5 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.13 of 22 pass attempts lost here (59%).59%13/22Gudmundssoattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
41
Failed forward pass
28
Failed take-on
7
Lost in the defensive third
37
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the attacking third: 60% of 15 pass attempts there are lost (9 times). Separately, 33% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Sunderland

Not just press intensity, but where the 166 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
12%
Middle third
26%
Own third
62%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 5.4 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 12% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 26% in midfield.

Where they win it back

111845141581311DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

Leeds

Not just press intensity, but where the 147 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
21%
Middle third
33%
Own third
46%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.8 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 21% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 33% in midfield.

Where they win it back

101425712166612887655DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Sunderland

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Sunderland win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 27 opposition possessions that Sunderland ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
3.7passes
median 2 · before Sunderland win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
13sec
median 5s · 27.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
63%
15%
11%
11%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.4
16s
15–30′
1.3
2s
30–45+′
4.3
17s
45–60′

too few
60–75′
3.7
13s
75–90+′
3.9
14s
average passesaverage seconds

Leeds

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Leeds win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 23 opposition possessions that Leeds ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
6.0passes
median 4 · before Leeds win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
17sec
median 12s · 23.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
35%
26%
30%
9%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.5
18s
15–30′
6.0
14s
30–45+′
4.3
12s
45–60′

too few
60–75′
11.5
37s
75–90+′
3.5
8s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Sunderland — 166 actions, 127 won
Leeds — 147 actions, 105 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Sunderland — 93 wins · 3% in the final third, 17% midfield, 80% own third
own third, right: 15 of 93 wins (16%)16%15 winsown third, centre: 42 of 93 wins (45%)45%42 winsown third, left: 17 of 93 wins (18%)18%17 winsmidfield, right: 8 of 93 wins (9%)9%8 winsmidfield, centre: 4 of 93 wins (4%)4%4 winsmidfield, left: 4 of 93 wins (4%)4%4 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 93 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 1 of 93 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 1 of 93 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Brian Brobbeyball-recovery25′88
Nilson Angulotackle45′73
Habib Diarraball-recovery85′73
Chris Riggball-recovery61′63
Luke O'Nienball-recovery83′63
Leeds — 74 wins · 9% in the final third, 30% midfield, 61% own third
own third, right: 12 of 74 wins (16%)16%12 winsown third, centre: 22 of 74 wins (30%)30%22 winsown third, left: 11 of 74 wins (15%)15%11 winsmidfield, right: 9 of 74 wins (12%)12%9 winsmidfield, centre: 4 of 74 wins (5%)5%4 winsmidfield, left: 9 of 74 wins (12%)12%9 winsfinal third, right: 5 of 74 wins (7%)7%5 winsfinal third, centre: 0 of 74 wins (0%)final third, left: 2 of 74 wins (3%)3%2 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Jayden Bogleball-recovery61′83
Noah Okaforball-recovery77′83
Ao Tanakaball-recovery26′81
Harry Wilsontackle1′74
Jayden Bogleball-recovery5′74
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Sunderland

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Sunderland? 47 opponent progressive passes and 11 shots faced (0.7 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Sunderland)

Right wing
32%
Right half-space
11%
Central
27%
Left half-space
19%
Left wing
12%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (32% of the danger conceded).

Leeds

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Leeds? 33 opponent progressive passes and 15 shots faced (1.0 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Leeds)

Right wing
30%
Right half-space
26%
Central
0%
Left half-space
16%
Left wing
29%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (30% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Sunderland

Build-up (own third)

safer, touchline to touchline, played in the channels

right 30% · centre 33% · left 37%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
166
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+10.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
19%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.1 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
47% of 62
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
56%
Progression (middle third)

safer, slower, more direct

right 33% · centre 26% · left 41%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
237
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
14%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
13%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
32% of 65
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
63%
Final third

safer, playing short, played inside

right 37% · centre 16% · left 47%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
115
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
6%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.4 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
31% of 32
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
41%

Leeds

Build-up (own third)

safer, left-sided, slower

right 23% · centre 41% · left 36%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
184
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+14.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
32%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
52% of 61
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
56%
Progression (middle third)

safer, slower, more recycling

right 38% · centre 25% · left 36%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
222
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
12%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.1 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
31% of 71
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
55%
Final third

safer, more direct

right 45% · centre 22% · left 33%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
104
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
12%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
14%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.2 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
24% of 37
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
49%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Sunderland
compared with their other 7 matches this season
PPDA5.4vs 4.3
Threat from passing4.03vs 5.48
Progressive passes33vs 41
Progressive carries25vs 34
Final-third entries34vs 39
Leeds
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Defensive actions147vs 172
Expected goals0.70vs 1.30
Field tilt51%vs 42%
Progressive passes47vs 37
PPDA4.8vs 4.1

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Sunderland

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
11%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
54%
Safe / backward
34%
12% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 88% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Leeds

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
14%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
49%
Safe / backward
36%
15% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 85% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Sunderland: 4 corners, 2 led to a shot; Leeds: 5 corners, 1 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Sunderland

4Corners
2Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
4Set-piece shots
0.23Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
25%1 corner50%25%2 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Leeds

5Corners
1Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.12Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
20%60%3 corners20%4 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Sunderland
Leeds

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report