Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportLigue 1 2026-09-13

Brest v PSG

BrestHome
0–1
PSGAway
1.061.04expected goals
0.881.53xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (1.06 – 1.04 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Brest
PSG
Possession (share of passes)
41.0%59.0%
Duels
4845
Duels won
45.8%35.6%
Aerial duels
2424
Aerial duels won
159
Successful dribbles
610
Passes
478688
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Brest above the line, PSG below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.591.171.76Nuno Mendes — save, 0.12 xGAchraf Hakimi — save, 0.02 xGFerran Torres — goal, 0.04 xGLudovic Ajorque — save, 0.06 xGOusmane Dembélé — save, 0.04 xGKhvicha Kvaratskhelia — miss, 0.06 xGPathé Mboup — save, 0.05 xGOusmane Dembélé — save, 0.10 xGKamory Doumbia — save, 0.07 xGPathé Mboup — miss, 0.07 xGLudovic Ajorque — miss, 0.08 xGKhvicha Kvaratskhelia — save, 0.06 xGPathé Mboup — miss, 0.03 xGLudovic Ajorque — miss, 0.08 xGKhvicha Kvaratskhelia — miss, 0.06 xGRaphaël Le Guen — miss, 0.03 xGOusmane Dembélé — save, 0.06 xGOusmane Dembélé — save, 0.05 xGKamory Doumbia — post, 0.23 xGKamory Doumbia — save, 0.09 xGLudovic Ajorque — save, 0.03 xGHugo Magnetti — miss, 0.02 xGKhvicha Kvaratskhelia — save, 0.05 xGKamory Doumbia — save, 0.07 xGJoão Neves — save, 0.16 xGJoão Neves — save, 0.12 xGDésiré Doué — miss, 0.03 xGWillian Pacho — miss, 0.05 xGJoseph Nonge — save, 0.04 xGPathé Mboup — save, 0.06 xGDjylian N'Guessan — miss, 0.06 xG1.061.04Nuno Mendes — save, 0.28 xGOTAchraf Hakimi — save, 0.07 xGOTFerran Torres — goal, 0.31 xGOTLudovic Ajorque — save, 0.24 xGOTOusmane Dembélé — save, 0.13 xGOTPathé Mboup — save, 0.07 xGOTOusmane Dembélé — save, 0.10 xGOTKamory Doumbia — save, 0.04 xGOTKhvicha Kvaratskhelia — save, 0.07 xGOTOusmane Dembélé — save, 0.08 xGOTOusmane Dembélé — save, 0.04 xGOTKamory Doumbia — save, 0.11 xGOTLudovic Ajorque — save, 0.04 xGOTKhvicha Kvaratskhelia — save, 0.10 xGOTKamory Doumbia — save, 0.05 xGOTJoão Neves — save, 0.28 xGOTJoão Neves — save, 0.07 xGOTJoseph Nonge — save, 0.07 xGOTPathé Mboup — save, 0.26 xGOT0.881.530'15'30'45'60'75'90'
BrestPSGsolid = xG31 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Brest
PSG

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Brest or PSG got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 1 of 1 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Brest

The question
When Brest has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Brest's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 24.1% of the time on the ball24%Progression: 52.7% of the time on the ball53%Chance creation: 20.2% of the time on the ball20%Attacking transition: 3.1% of the time on the ball53%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up24.1%
Progression52.7%
Chance creation20.2%
Attacking transition3.1%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Brest spends most of its time on the ball (53% of its time on the ball).

PSG

The question
When PSG has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of PSG's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 30.5% of the time on the ball30%Progression: 48.0% of the time on the ball48%Chance creation: 19.0% of the time on the ball19%Attacking transition: 2.5% of the time on the ball48%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up30.5%
Progression48.0%
Chance creation19.0%
Attacking transition2.5%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where PSG spends most of its time on the ball (48% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Brest
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
PSG
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Brest — 622 touches
PSG — 835 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Brest

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Brest actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
478
ACTIONS
7%5%10%6%3%8%10%10%9%14%3%1%3%3%7%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
98
ACTIONS
7%6%9%5%3%7%9%11%9%13%2%1%3%3%10%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left wing of the middle third (13.9% of all actions). 58% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 42% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 31% defensive, 51% middle, 18% attacking.

PSG

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does PSG actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
688
ACTIONS
6%6%10%3%5%10%9%8%11%10%4%3%4%5%5%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
198
ACTIONS
5%7%7%7%4%10%11%13%8%9%4%2%3%2%9%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left half-space of the middle third (10.7% of all actions). 60% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 40% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 30% defensive, 50% middle, 20% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Brest leaned on their left (41%); PSG leaned on their left (42%).

Brest
41%Left side32%Middle27%Right sideATTACKING →
L
41%32%27%
R
PSG
42%Left side23%Middle35%Right sideATTACKING →
L
42%23%35%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Brest — 32 entries, 41% through the left wing
Left wing: 13 entries (41%)1341%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 3 entries (9%)39%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 7 entries (22%)722%CENTRERight half-space: 3 entries (9%)39%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 6 entries (19%)619%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
PSG — 52 entries, 33% through the left wing
Left wing: 17 entries (33%)1733%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 9 entries (17%)917%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 6 entries (12%)612%CENTRERight half-space: 5 entries (10%)510%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 15 entries (29%)1529%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Brest

The football question
How does Brest progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

148build-up passes attempted
86%completed
35%reach the middle third
4%go long into the final third

Pass types

58CB · 46%
15Long Wide · 12%
6Long Central · 5%
35Wide → FB · 28%
13Central · 10%
CB58 · 46%
right: 37 passes, most from Lala37left: 21 passes, most from Lloris21
Long Wide15 · 12%
right: 8 passes, most from Selvik8left: 7 passes, most from Selvik7
Long Central6 · 5%
left: 3 passes, most from Selvik3right: 3 passes, most from Selvik3
Wide → FB35 · 28%
right: 22 passes, most from Selvik22left: 13 passes, most from Chotard13
Central13 · 10%
right: 7 passes, most from Selvik7left: 6 passes, most from Locko6
◆ Vision AI Insight
Brest build predominantly down the right, with Selvik as the fulcrum (32 build-up passes). Only 39% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RW def → RW mid (9×).

PSG

The football question
How does PSG progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

206build-up passes attempted
83%completed
22%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

74CB · 43%
11Long Wide · 6%
4Long Central · 2%
67Wide → FB · 39%
15Central · 9%
CB74 · 43%
right: 48 passes, most from Marquinhos48left: 26 passes, most from Pacho26
Long Wide11 · 6%
right: 7 passes, most from Safonov7left: 4 passes, most from Vitinha4
Long Central4 · 2%
right: 3 passes, most from Mendes3
Wide → FB67 · 39%
right: 38 passes, most from Zaïre-Emery38left: 29 passes, most from Mendes29
Central15 · 9%
left: 11 passes, most from Mendes11right: 4 passes, most from Vitinha4
◆ Vision AI Insight
PSG build predominantly down the right, with Pacho as the fulcrum (40 build-up passes). Only 22% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (19×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Brest

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 50 progressive passes across 1 match (50.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
18%
Right half-space
12%
Central
26%
Left half-space
14%
Left wing
30%
Progression is left-dominant: 30% right side · 26% central · 44% left.

Who generates it

Egil Selvik
13 · 26%
Bradley Locko
11 · 22%
Joris Chotard
6 · 12%
Raphaël Le Guen
5 · 10%
Kenny Lala
4 · 8%
Top two — Egil Selvik & Bradley Locko — account for 48% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
50.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
32% reach final third
10% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 68% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 32% of progressive passes reached the final third and 10% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 48% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacesterile
Centralefficient
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced

PSG

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 45 progressive passes across 1 match (45.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
33%
Right half-space
2%
Central
9%
Left half-space
9%
Left wing
47%
Progression is left-dominant: 36% right side · 9% central · 56% left.

Who generates it

Nuno Mendes
10 · 22%
João Neves
5 · 11%
Vitinha
5 · 11%
Fabián Ruiz
4 · 9%
Khvicha Kvaratskhelia
4 · 9%
Top two — Nuno Mendes & João Neves — account for 33% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
45.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
13% reach final third
18% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 87% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 13% of progressive passes reached the final third and 18% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 33% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacesterile
Centralsterile
Left half-spaceefficient
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Brest

The question
Where do Brest's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

16shots
1.1xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Attacking transition: 4 shots (25%)25%4Settled attack: 10 shots (62%)62%10Set piece: 2 shots (12%)12%216SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 25% of shots400.440.11
Cross100.080.08
Pass into the box / short pass200.140.07
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.230.23
Settled attack 62% of shots1000.530.05
Cross100.090.09
Long ball100.030.03
Pass into the box / short pass400.220.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)400.180.05
Set piece 12% of shots200.100.05
Corner200.100.05

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Pathé Mboup20.140
Bradley Locko10.090
Kenny Lala10.080
Giovani Versini10.070
Ludovic Ajorque10.060

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Kamory Doumbia40.450
Ludovic Ajorque40.250
Pathé Mboup40.210
Djylian N'Guessan10.060
Joseph Nonge10.040
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Brest's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.5 of 1.1 xG, 10 of 16 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 4 of the 16 shots (25%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 16 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 1.1 xG (-1.1).

PSG

The question
Where do PSG's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

15shots
1.0xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (20%)20%3Settled attack: 11 shots (73%)73%11Set piece: 1 shots (7%)7%115SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 20% of shots310.200.07
Pass into the box / short pass310.200.07
Settled attack 73% of shots1100.820.07
Cut-back200.180.09
Pass into the box / short pass600.410.07
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)300.230.08
Set piece 7% of shots100.020.02
Corner100.020.02

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Vitinha10.160
Khvicha Kvaratskhelia10.120
Ferran Torres20.120
Fabián Ruiz20.110
João Neves10.100

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
João Neves20.280
Ousmane Dembélé40.250
Khvicha Kvaratskhelia40.240
Nuno Mendes10.120
Willian Pacho10.050
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of PSG's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.8 of 1.0 xG, 11 of 15 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 3 of the 15 shots (20%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 1 of the 15 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 1.0 xG (-0.0).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Brest

The question
How does Brest deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

18 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (22%), 2 led to a shot (11%). 3 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

PSG

The question
How does PSG deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

10 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (50%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 7 cut-backs: 4 found a team-mate (57%), 2 led to a shot (29%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Brest

The question
Which part of the final third does Brest actually cross from?

18 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (6%)6%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 4 crosses (22%)22%4advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 4 crosses (22%)22%4byline right wing: 5 crosses (28%)28%5byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 1 crosses (6%)6%1byline left wing: 3 crosses (17%)17%3
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing528%0
advanced · right wing422%1
advanced · left wing422%0
byline · left wing317%1
deep · right wing16%0
byline · left half-space16%0

PSG

The question
Which part of the final third does PSG actually cross from?

10 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 1 crosses (10%)10%1deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (10%)10%1advanced right wing: 2 crosses (20%)20%2advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (20%)20%2byline right wing: 2 crosses (20%)20%2byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 2 crosses (20%)20%2
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing220%0
advanced · left wing220%0
byline · right wing220%0
byline · left wing220%0
deep · right half-space110%0
deep · left wing110%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+0.98Brest on-ball value
+1.41PSG on-ball value
+0.0+0.7+1.4HALF TIME+0.98+1.410′15′30′45′60′75′90′
BrestPSGEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Brest — where the value came from
Passes478 actions+0.33
Carries98 actions-0.07
Dribbles17 actions-0.01
Shots16 actions+0.44
Ball wins63 actions+0.30
PSG — where the value came from
Passes688 actions+0.64
Carries198 actions-0.06
Dribbles18 actions-0.12
Shots15 actions+0.65
Ball wins52 actions+0.31
Brest — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Kamory Doumbia59+0.316
Bradley Locko86+0.163
Kenny Lala69+0.161
Egil Selvik51+0.146
Joris Chotard62+0.119
Joseph Nonge (lowest)16-0.084
PSG — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Vitinha131+0.333
Nuno Mendes98+0.277
Ousmane Dembélé90+0.261
Ferran Torres41+0.131
Willian Pacho78+0.123
Achraf Hakimi (lowest)38-0.019
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Brest

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

4 of 33 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%4/33Guen2 of 26 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%2/26Guen9 of 48 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%9/48Selvik4 of 28 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%4/28Selvik13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 of 40 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%9/40Lala10 of 46 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%10/46Lala8 of 49 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%8/49Chotard2 of 45 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%2/45Mboup5 of 67 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%5/67Locko13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.7 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 of 15 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%4/15Guen14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 of 34 pass attempts lost here (35%).35%12/34Lockoattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
33
Failed forward pass
21
Failed take-on
11
Lost in the defensive third
21
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the attacking third: 35% of 34 pass attempts there are lost (12 times). Separately, 38% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

PSG

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

9 of 43 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%9/43Marquinhos6 of 40 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%6/40Marquinhos8 of 67 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%8/67Safonov5 of 24 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%5/24Ruiz7 of 32 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%7/32Mendes6 of 71 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%6/71Doué6 of 63 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%6/63Dembélé5 of 58 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%5/58Marquinhos6 of 79 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%6/79Kvaratskhe4 of 70 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%4/70Mendes3 of 27 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%3/27Dembélé6 of 21 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%6/21Hakimi5 of 26 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%5/26Torres4 of 34 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%4/34Akliouche5 of 33 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%5/33Kvaratskheattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
23
Failed forward pass
16
Failed take-on
8
Lost in the defensive third
35
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the attacking third: 29% of 21 pass attempts there are lost (6 times). Separately, 27% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Brest

Not just press intensity, but where the 148 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
22%
Middle third
43%
Own third
34%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 6.0 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 22% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 43% in midfield.

Where they win it back

614167814161591051547DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

PSG

Not just press intensity, but where the 138 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
9%
Middle third
38%
Own third
53%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 7.2 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 9% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 38% in midfield.

Where they win it back

141028147871313125DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Brest

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Brest win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 36 opposition possessions that Brest ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
10.2passes
median 8 · before Brest win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
28sec
median 20s · 36.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
22%
14%
19%
44%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
8.8
28s
15–30′
13.5
38s
30–45+′
22.3
65s
45–60′
6.7
16s
60–75′
9.1
25s
75–90+′
7.4
18s
average passesaverage seconds

PSG

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before PSG win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 30 opposition possessions that PSG ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.6passes
median 4 · before PSG win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
16sec
median 13s · 30.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
23%
47%
20%
10%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.4
15s
15–30′
3.8
15s
30–45+′

too few
45–60′
4.8
14s
60–75′
5.3
16s
75–90+′
3.0
12s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Brest — 148 actions, 109 won
PSG — 138 actions, 102 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Brest — 77 wins · 5% in the final third, 48% midfield, 47% own third
own third, right: 14 of 77 wins (18%)18%14 winsown third, centre: 11 of 77 wins (14%)14%11 winsown third, left: 11 of 77 wins (14%)14%11 winsmidfield, right: 13 of 77 wins (17%)17%13 winsmidfield, centre: 11 of 77 wins (14%)14%11 winsmidfield, left: 13 of 77 wins (17%)17%13 winsfinal third, right: 0 of 77 wins (0%)final third, centre: 2 of 77 wins (3%)3%2 winsfinal third, left: 2 of 77 wins (3%)3%2 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Pathé Mboupball-recovery65′93
Pathé Mboupinterception84′81
Kamory Doumbiaball-recovery54′78
Kamory Doumbiainterception54′77
Kenny Lalaball-recovery78′66
PSG — 74 wins · 7% in the final third, 32% midfield, 61% own third
own third, right: 14 of 74 wins (19%)19%14 winsown third, centre: 20 of 74 wins (27%)27%20 winsown third, left: 11 of 74 wins (15%)15%11 winsmidfield, right: 5 of 74 wins (7%)7%5 winsmidfield, centre: 9 of 74 wins (12%)12%9 winsmidfield, left: 10 of 74 wins (14%)14%10 winsfinal third, right: 0 of 74 wins (0%)final third, centre: 2 of 74 wins (3%)3%2 winsfinal third, left: 3 of 74 wins (4%)4%3 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Khvicha Kvaratskheliainterception12′89
João Nevestackle17′76
Ousmane Dembéléball-recovery12′75
Ousmane Dembéléinterception12′73
Vitinhaball-recovery13′70
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Brest

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Brest? 45 opponent progressive passes and 15 shots faced (1.0 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Brest)

Right wing
32%
Right half-space
2%
Central
7%
Left half-space
16%
Left wing
42%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (42% of the danger conceded).

PSG

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against PSG? 50 opponent progressive passes and 16 shots faced (1.1 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into PSG)

Right wing
19%
Right half-space
8%
Central
29%
Left half-space
13%
Left wing
31%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (31% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Brest

Build-up (own third)

safer, right-sided, more recycling

right 37% · centre 38% · left 24%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
182
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+11.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
25%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
63% of 60
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
47%
Progression (middle third)

safer, left-sided, circulating

right 32% · centre 26% · left 43%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
303
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
42% of 71
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
42%
Final third

safer, slower, left-sided

right 22% · centre 20% · left 57%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
108
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
34% of 38
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
58%

PSG

Build-up (own third)

safer, touchline to touchline, played in the channels

right 39% · centre 34% · left 27%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
267
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
22%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
18%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
60% of 65
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
45%
Progression (middle third)

safer, circulating, shorter passing

right 37% · centre 25% · left 38%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
451
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
47% of 74
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
42%
Final third

safer, narrow, central, played inside

right 32% · centre 22% · left 46%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
186
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
5%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.0 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
32% of 40
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
55%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Brest
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Defensive actions148vs 174
Expected goals1.06vs 1.98
Progressive passes50vs 43
Pass accuracy82%vs 79%
Progressive carries34vs 39
PSG
compared with their other 7 matches this season
PPDA7.2vs 3.9
Field tilt58%vs 76%
Final-third entries52vs 76
Passes688vs 766
Expected goals1.04vs 2.36

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Brest

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
15%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
44%
Safe / backward
40%
15% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 85% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

PSG

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
10%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
45%
Safe / backward
43%
12% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 88% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Brest: 3 corners, 2 led to a shot; PSG: 2 corners, 1 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Brest

3Corners
2Led to a shot
0Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.10Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
33%1 corner67%2 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

PSG

2Corners
1Led to a shot
2Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.02Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
50%1 corner50%1 corner1 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Brest
PSG

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report