Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportLigue 1 2026-09-06

Marseille v Paris FC

MarseilleHome
2–3
Paris FCAway
1.252.87expected goals
1.383.05xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (1.25 – 2.87 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Marseille
Paris FC
Possession (share of passes)
60.4%39.6%
Duels
3753
Duels won
51.4%34.0%
Aerial duels
2121
Aerial duels won
165
Successful dribbles
86
Passes
670439
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Marseille above the line, Paris FC below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
1.172.343.51Lassine Sinayoko — goal, 0.35 xGAmine Gouiri — goal, 0.12 xGAmine Gouiri — save, 0.21 xGAngel Gomes — save, 0.02 xGAngel Gomes — miss, 0.03 xGIlan Kebbal — save, 0.04 xGPablo Pagis — save, 0.04 xGLassine Sinayoko — goal, 0.13 xGTimothy Weah — save, 0.11 xGEmerson — miss, 0.08 xGPierre-Emile Højbjerg — save, 0.12 xGLuca Koleosho — save, 0.03 xGIgor Paixão — post, 0.03 xGLuca Koleosho — miss, 0.06 xGAdama Camara — miss, 0.09 xGHimad Abdelli — miss, 0.04 xGLassine Sinayoko — save, 0.10 xGIlan Kebbal — save, 0.56 xGLuca Koleosho — miss, 0.20 xGPablo Pagis — miss, 0.00 xGAmine Gouiri — goal, 0.11 xGIlan Kebbal — miss, 0.08 xGLuca Koleosho — miss, 0.07 xGAmine Gouiri — save, 0.09 xGMoses Simon — miss, 0.07 xGPierre Lees-Melou — miss, 0.03 xGTadjidine Mmadi — miss, 0.08 xGMoses Simon — save, 0.11 xGLassine Sinayoko — goal, 0.79 xGMoses Simon — save, 0.13 xGKeyliane Abdallah — miss, 0.03 xGAmine Gouiri — miss, 0.15 xG1.252.87Lassine Sinayoko — goal, 0.46 xGOTAmine Gouiri — goal, 0.41 xGOTAmine Gouiri — save, 0.07 xGOTAngel Gomes — save, 0.24 xGOTIlan Kebbal — save, 0.06 xGOTPablo Pagis — save, 0.02 xGOTLassine Sinayoko — goal, 0.42 xGOTTimothy Weah — save, 0.23 xGOTPierre-Emile Højbjerg — save, 0.08 xGOTLuca Koleosho — save, 0.06 xGOTLassine Sinayoko — save, 0.13 xGOTIlan Kebbal — save, 0.77 xGOTAmine Gouiri — goal, 0.27 xGOTAmine Gouiri — save, 0.06 xGOTMoses Simon — save, 0.03 xGOTLassine Sinayoko — goal, 0.97 xGOTMoses Simon — save, 0.13 xGOT1.383.050'15'30'45'60'75'90'
MarseilleParis FCsolid = xG32 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Marseille
Paris FC

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Marseille or Paris FC got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 5 of 5 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Marseille

The question
When Marseille has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Marseille's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 22.0% of the time on the ball22%Progression: 48.1% of the time on the ball48%Chance creation: 27.6% of the time on the ball28%Attacking transition: 2.3% of the time on the ball48%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up22.0%
Progression48.1%
Chance creation27.6%
Attacking transition2.3%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Marseille spends most of its time on the ball (48% of its time on the ball).

Paris FC

The question
When Paris FC has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Paris FC's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 43.0% of the time on the ball43%Progression: 45.1% of the time on the ball45%Chance creation: 11.1% of the time on the ball11%Attacking transition: 0.9% of the time on the ball45%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up43.0%
Progression45.1%
Chance creation11.1%
Attacking transition0.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Paris FC spends most of its time on the ball (45% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Marseille
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Paris FC
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Marseille — 830 touches
Paris FC — 576 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Marseille

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Marseille actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
670
ACTIONS
1%3%7%6%3%5%8%12%18%11%5%4%1%5%9%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
194
ACTIONS
1%4%6%11%3%7%6%14%13%13%7%2%3%4%7%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left half-space of the middle third (17.1% of all actions). 65% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 35% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 21% defensive, 54% middle, 24% attacking.

Paris FC

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Paris FC actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
439
ACTIONS
7%9%13%5%7%6%12%14%9%6%3%2%3%3%2%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
96
ACTIONS
4%7%12%4%4%7%15%18%7%6%5%2%5%2%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (15.0% of all actions). 70% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 30% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 39% defensive, 48% middle, 12% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Marseille leaned on their left (50%); Paris FC leaned on the middle (38%).

Marseille
50%Left side21%Middle29%Right sideATTACKING →
L
50%21%29%
R
Paris FC
27%Left side38%Middle35%Right sideATTACKING →
L
27%38%35%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Marseille — 57 entries, 49% through the left wing
Left wing: 28 entries (49%)2849%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 9 entries (16%)916%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 1 entries (2%)12%CENTRERight half-space: 6 entries (11%)611%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 13 entries (23%)1323%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Paris FC — 26 entries, 31% through the centre
Left wing: 2 entries (8%)28%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 5 entries (19%)519%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 8 entries (31%)831%CENTRERight half-space: 4 entries (15%)415%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 7 entries (27%)727%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Marseille

The football question
How does Marseille progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

136build-up passes attempted
94%completed
32%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

62CB · 48%
4Long Wide · 3%
54Wide → FB · 42%
8Central · 6%

Sequence success — build-up

21build-up sequences in this match
19%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
19%turned over with nothing to show
CB62 · 48%
left: 37 passes, most from Aguerd37right: 25 passes, most from Egan-Riley25
Long Wide4 · 3%
left: 3 passes, most from Lange3
Wide → FB54 · 42%
left: 43 passes, most from Lange43right: 11 passes, most from Weah11
Central8 · 6%
left: 4 passes, most from Lange4right: 4 passes, most from Lange4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Marseille build predominantly down the left, with Aguerd as the fulcrum (35 build-up passes). Only 32% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (19×).

Paris FC

The football question
How does Paris FC progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

179build-up passes attempted
78%completed
29%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

68CB · 49%
4Long Wide · 3%
2Long Central · 1%
47Wide → FB · 34%
18Central · 13%

Sequence success — build-up

31build-up sequences in this match
10%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
55%turned over with nothing to show
CB68 · 49%
left: 43 passes, most from Traoré43right: 25 passes, most from Chergui25
Long Wide4 · 3%
right: 3 passes, most from Lees-Melou3
Long Central2 · 1%
left: 2 passes, most from Trapp2
Wide → FB47 · 34%
right: 34 passes, most from Camara34left: 13 passes, most from Lees-Melou13
Central18 · 13%
right: 10 passes, most from Trapp10left: 8 passes, most from Lopez8
◆ Vision AI Insight
Paris FC build predominantly down the right, with Chergui as the fulcrum (24 build-up passes). Only 29% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → C def (11×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Marseille

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 38 progressive passes across 1 match (38.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
32%
Right half-space
11%
Central
5%
Left half-space
18%
Left wing
34%
Progression is left-dominant: 42% right side · 5% central · 53% left.

Who generates it

Timothy Weah
7 · 18%
Emerson
5 · 13%
Nayef Aguerd
5 · 13%
Amine Harit
4 · 11%
Igor Paixão
4 · 11%
Top two — Timothy Weah & Emerson — account for 32% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
38.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
18% reach final third
29% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 82% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 18% of progressive passes reached the final third and 29% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 32% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spaceefficient
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced

Paris FC

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 33 progressive passes across 1 match (33.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
12%
Right half-space
18%
Central
24%
Left half-space
24%
Left wing
21%
Progression is left-dominant: 30% right side · 24% central · 45% left.

Who generates it

Pablo Pagis
7 · 21%
Ilan Kebbal
5 · 15%
Hamari Traoré
3 · 9%
Kevin Trapp
3 · 9%
Luca Koleosho
3 · 9%
Top two — Pablo Pagis & Ilan Kebbal — account for 36% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
33.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
27% reach final third
21% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 73% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 27% of progressive passes reached the final third and 21% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 36% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingsterile
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spaceefficient
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Marseille

The question
Where do Marseille's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

14shots
1.2xG
0.09xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 4 shots (29%)29%4Settled attack: 8 shots (57%)57%8Set piece: 2 shots (14%)14%214SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 29% of shots400.270.07
Cut-back100.090.09
Long ball100.030.03
Pass into the box / short pass200.140.07
Settled attack 57% of shots820.930.12
Cross200.200.10
Cut-back110.110.11
Pass into the box / short pass300.450.15
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)210.160.08
Set piece 14% of shots200.050.02
Corner100.020.02
Free kick100.030.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Amine Harit40.471
Timothy Weah20.280
Igor Paixão20.120
Keyliane Abdallah10.090
Pierre-Emile Højbjerg10.080

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Amine Gouiri50.702
Pierre-Emile Højbjerg10.120
Timothy Weah10.110
Emerson10.080
Tadjidine Mmadi10.080
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Marseille's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.9 of 1.2 xG, 8 of 14 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 4 of the 14 shots (29%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 14 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 1.2 xG (+0.8).

Paris FC

The question
Where do Paris FC's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

18shots
2.9xG
0.16xG per shot
3big chances (0.3+ xG)
3goals
Attacking transition: 6 shots (33%)33%6Settled attack: 10 shots (56%)56%10Set piece: 2 shots (11%)11%218SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 33% of shots610.860.14
Long ball100.070.07
Pass into the box / short pass310.660.22
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.130.07
Settled attack 56% of shots1001.090.11
Cut-back100.060.06
Long ball200.120.06
Pass into the box / short pass700.910.13
Set piece 11% of shots220.920.46
Corner110.130.13
Penalty110.790.79

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Pablo Pagis30.680
Luca Koleosho20.441
Ilan Kebbal30.310
Patrick Zabi10.110
Lassine Sinayoko10.080

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Lassine Sinayoko41.363
Ilan Kebbal30.680
Luca Koleosho40.360
Moses Simon30.310
Adama Camara10.090
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Paris FC's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.1 of 2.9 xG, 10 of 18 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 6 of the 18 shots (33%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 18 shots came from set pieces; 3 goals from 2.9 xG (+0.1).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Marseille

The question
How does Marseille deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

8 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (62%), 2 led to a shot (25%). 4 cut-backs: 3 found a team-mate (75%), 2 led to a shot (50%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Paris FC

The question
How does Paris FC deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

4 crosses: 3 found a team-mate (75%), 1 led to a shot (25%). 4 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (25%), 1 led to a shot (25%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Marseille

The question
Which part of the final third does Marseille actually cross from?

8 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 4 crosses (50%)50%4advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 1 crosses (12%)12%1byline right wing: 3 crosses (38%)38%3byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 0 crosses (0%)
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing450%0
byline · right wing338%2
advanced · left wing112%0

Paris FC

The question
Which part of the final third does Paris FC actually cross from?

4 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (25%)25%1advanced right wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 1 crosses (25%)25%1byline right wing: 0 crosses (0%)byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 2 crosses (50%)50%2
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing250%1
deep · left wing125%0
advanced · left wing125%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+1.54Marseille on-ball value
+4.03Paris FC on-ball value
+0.0+2.0+4.0HALF TIME+1.54+4.030′15′30′45′60′75′90′
MarseilleParis FCEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Marseille — where the value came from
Passes670 actions+0.65
Carries194 actions+0.11
Dribbles27 actions-0.15
Shots14 actions+0.50
Ball wins54 actions+0.42
Paris FC — where the value came from
Passes439 actions+1.58
Carries96 actions+0.34
Dribbles11 actions+0.56
Shots18 actions+1.19
Ball wins62 actions+0.36
Marseille — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Amine Harit55+0.382
Amine Gouiri40+0.334
Pierre-Emile Højbjerg127+0.225
Timothy Weah88+0.200
Emerson100+0.178
Igor Paixão (lowest)63-0.128
Paris FC — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Pablo Pagis39+1.425
Luca Koleosho25+0.557
Lassine Sinayoko32+0.488
Moses Simon14+0.479
Ilan Kebbal69+0.437
Patrick Zabi (lowest)17-0.050
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Marseille

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

7 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.1 of 21 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%1/21Abdallah3 of 48 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%3/48Lange1 of 43 pass attempts lost here (2%).2%1/43Emerson1 of 17 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%1/17Emerson2 of 35 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%2/35Harit4 of 56 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%4/56Weah5 of 80 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%5/80Højbjerg11 of 123 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%11/123Højbjerg6 of 72 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%6/72Emerson4 of 34 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%4/34Weah8 of 30 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%8/30Harit9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 36 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%6/36Garcia4 of 59 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%4/59Paixãoattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
22
Failed forward pass
15
Failed take-on
19
Lost in the defensive third
8
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the attacking third: 27% of 30 pass attempts there are lost (8 times). Separately, 38% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Paris FC

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

10 of 31 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%10/31Camara6 of 39 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%6/39Chergui15 of 56 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%15/56Trapp1 of 22 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%1/22Lopez8 of 31 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%8/31Coppola2 of 27 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%2/27Lopez8 of 52 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%8/52Chergui8 of 63 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%8/63Lees-Melou4 of 39 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%4/39Coppola2 of 27 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%2/27Koleosho11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.attacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
13
Failed forward pass
6
Failed take-on
5
Lost in the defensive third
40
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 32% of 31 pass attempts there are lost (10 times). Separately, 17% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Marseille

Not just press intensity, but where the 145 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
21%
Middle third
43%
Own third
36%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.4 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 21% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 43% in midfield.

Where they win it back

61127441210151977786DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

Paris FC

Not just press intensity, but where the 148 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
9%
Middle third
32%
Own third
58%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 8.9 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 9% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 32% in midfield.

Where they win it back

1523261210713814644DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Marseille

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Marseille win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 33 opposition possessions that Marseille ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.1passes
median 3 · before Marseille win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
13sec
median 6s · 33.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
42%
27%
18%
12%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
5.2
16s
15–30′
3.5
10s
30–45+′
6.8
10s
45–60′
7.3
20s
60–75′
3.5
8s
75–90+′
4.5
13s
average passesaverage seconds

Paris FC

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Paris FC win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 28 opposition possessions that Paris FC ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
7.7passes
median 8 · before Paris FC win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
23sec
median 20s · 28.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
25%
21%
21%
32%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
11.6
35s
15–30′

too few
30–45+′
5.2
19s
45–60′
7.1
21s
60–75′
6.0
17s
75–90+′
5.2
19s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Marseille — 145 actions, 117 won
Paris FC — 148 actions, 101 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Marseille — 78 wins · 17% in the final third, 40% midfield, 44% own third
own third, right: 9 of 78 wins (12%)12%9 winsown third, centre: 21 of 78 wins (27%)27%21 winsown third, left: 4 of 78 wins (5%)5%4 winsmidfield, right: 10 of 78 wins (13%)13%10 winsmidfield, centre: 11 of 78 wins (14%)14%11 winsmidfield, left: 10 of 78 wins (13%)13%10 winsfinal third, right: 5 of 78 wins (6%)6%5 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 78 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 7 of 78 wins (9%)9%7 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Amine Haritinterception3′87
Angel Gomesball-recovery68′86
Himad Abdelliball-recovery51′80
Himad Abdelliball-recovery12′76
CJ Egan-Rileytackle11′76
Paris FC — 81 wins · 4% in the final third, 22% midfield, 74% own third
own third, right: 22 of 81 wins (27%)27%22 winsown third, centre: 25 of 81 wins (31%)31%25 winsown third, left: 13 of 81 wins (16%)16%13 winsmidfield, right: 7 of 81 wins (9%)9%7 winsmidfield, centre: 6 of 81 wins (7%)7%6 winsmidfield, left: 5 of 81 wins (6%)6%5 winsfinal third, right: 2 of 81 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, centre: 0 of 81 wins (0%)final third, left: 1 of 81 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Moses Simonball-recovery82′77
Maxime Lopezball-recovery81′67
Adama Camaratackle45′67
Ilan Kebbalball-recovery43′64
Luca Koleoshoball-recovery48′64
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Marseille

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Marseille? 33 opponent progressive passes and 18 shots faced (2.9 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Marseille)

Right wing
8%
Right half-space
16%
Central
25%
Left half-space
22%
Left wing
28%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (28% of the danger conceded).

Paris FC

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Paris FC? 38 opponent progressive passes and 14 shots faced (1.2 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Paris FC)

Right wing
31%
Right half-space
20%
Central
8%
Left half-space
22%
Left wing
19%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (31% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Marseille

Build-up (own third)

safer, left-sided, playing short

right 18% · centre 40% · left 42%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
185
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
26%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
84% of 45
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
18%
Progression (middle third)

safer, left-sided, played inside

right 21% · centre 33% · left 46%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
474
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
22%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.4 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
49% of 72
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
44%
Final third

safer, shorter passing, playing short

right 36% · centre 10% · left 53%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
232
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
4%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
23% of 43
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
63%

Paris FC

Build-up (own third)

safer, touchline to touchline, shorter passing

right 34% · centre 39% · left 27%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
212
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+9.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
14%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
59% of 61
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
51%
Progression (middle third)

quicker, shorter passing, safer

right 34% · centre 38% · left 28%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
263
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
5%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
41% of 51
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
53%
Final third

safer, narrow, central, played inside

right 38% · centre 34% · left 28%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
71
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
13%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.1 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
52% of 25
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
12%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Marseille
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Threat from passing6.25vs 4.51
Pass accuracy91%vs 85%
Field tilt74%vs 56%
Progressive passes38vs 44
Progressive carries62vs 53
Paris FC
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Passes439vs 617
Expected goals2.87vs 1.38
PPDA8.9vs 6.1
Field tilt26%vs 49%
Pass accuracy82%vs 86%

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Marseille

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
10%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
49%
Safe / backward
40%
11% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 89% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Paris FC

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
13%
Progressive
0%
Neutral / sideways
48%
Safe / backward
38%
14% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 86% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Marseille: 5 corners, 1 led to a shot; Paris FC: 4 corners, 2 led to a shot, 1 set-piece goal.

Marseille

5Corners
1Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.05Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
20%1 corner20%1 corner20%1 corner40%2 corners3 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Paris FC

4Corners
2Led to a shot
1Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.13Set-piece xG
1Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
25%1 corner75%3 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Marseille
Paris FC

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report