Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Le Havre above the line, Angers below.
xG race
Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places. Switch to xGOT (xG on target) to count only the shots that tested the goalkeeper, valued by where they went in the goal mouth, or Both to see the two together.
Show
Le HavreAngerssolid = xG24 shots — click any dot
Shot map
Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.
Le Havre
Angers
In possession
In possession
How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.
When Le Havre has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?
The share of Le Havre's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen. A phase is where the ball is on the pitch (own third, middle third, final third); a transition or a set piece skips the build-up and is counted on its own.
Phase
Share of the time
Build-up
21.4%
Progression
54.7%
Chance creation
21.0%
Attacking transition
2.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Le Havre spends most of its time on the ball (55% of its time on the ball).
Angers
The question
When Angers has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?
The share of Angers's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen. A phase is where the ball is on the pitch (own third, middle third, final third); a transition or a set piece skips the build-up and is counted on its own.
Phase
Share of the time
Build-up
35.2%
Progression
46.0%
Chance creation
16.6%
Attacking transition
2.3%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Angers spends most of its time on the ball (46% of its time on the ball).
Passing Network
Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links. Lines are this match's passes between two players, thicker for more.
Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed). Eight families per team — click any map to open it wide, then filter by channel or third, from one to another (or click a cell of the flow grids), by outcome, half, minute and passer. Channels: right wing, right half-space, centre, left half-space, left wing.
From channel
To channel
From third
To third
Outcome · half
Minutes
Channel to channel · click a cell
Third to third · click a cell
Touch Density
Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.
Le Havre — 596 touches
Angers — 644 touches
Which Zones Do They Attack Through?
Le Havre
The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Le Havre actually do its on-ball work?
Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other. Each is binned into the 15 pitch zones (three thirds × five vertical lanes) and shaded by its share of that kind of action; the arrows are the real actions.
Passes
the ball moved by a pass
426
ACTIONS
Carries
the ball moved with a player
123
ACTIONS
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the right half-space of the middle third (12.6% of all actions). 58% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 42% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 28% defensive, 50% middle, 22% attacking.
Angers
The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Angers actually do its on-ball work?
Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other. Each is binned into the 15 pitch zones (three thirds × five vertical lanes) and shaded by its share of that kind of action; the arrows are the real actions.
Passes
the ball moved by a pass
512
ACTIONS
Carries
the ball moved with a player
125
ACTIONS
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left wing of the middle third (11.6% of all actions). 54% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 46% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 35% defensive, 45% middle, 20% attacking.
Attack sides
Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Le Havre leaned on their right (43%); Angers leaned on their left (42%).
Le Havre
L
32%25%43%
R
Angers
L
42%23%35%
R
Final-third entries
Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.
Le Havre — 44 entries, 50% through the right wing
Angers — 48 entries, 46% through the left wing
Build-up1 section
Build-Up — the pass map
Le Havre
The football question
How does Le Havre progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?
Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central. Each gets its own panel below, so nothing competes for attention. Arrow width = volume, labelled with the exact count; hover for the top passer.
110build-up passes attempted
90%completed
28%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third
Pass types
29CB · 29%
8Long Wide · 8%
1Long Central · 1%
52Wide → FB · 53%
9Central · 9%
CB29 · 29%
Long Wide8 · 8%
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB52 · 53%
Central9 · 9%
◆ Vision AI Insight
Le Havre build predominantly down the right, with Gallon as the fulcrum (29 build-up passes). Only 28% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → C def (12×).
Angers
The football question
How does Angers progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?
Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central. Each gets its own panel below, so nothing competes for attention. Arrow width = volume, labelled with the exact count; hover for the top passer.
180build-up passes attempted
82%completed
26%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third
Pass types
50CB · 34%
8Long Wide · 5%
1Long Central · 1%
68Wide → FB · 46%
21Central · 14%
CB50 · 34%
Long Wide8 · 5%
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB68 · 46%
Central21 · 14%
◆ Vision AI Insight
Angers build predominantly down the left, with Lopes as the fulcrum (37 build-up passes). Only 26% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (12×).
Progression1 section
How They Progress — the mechanism
Le Havre
Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 41 progressive passes across 1 match (41.0/game).
Origin lane
Right wing
37%
Right half-space
10%
Central
20%
Left half-space
2%
Left wing
32%
Progression is right-dominant: 46% right side · 20% central · 34% left.
Who generates it
Elias Jelert
5 · 12%
Kaito Mizuta
5 · 12%
Ahmed Touba
5 · 12%
Djibril Ouziad
5 · 12%
Mbwana Samatta
4 · 10%
Top two — Elias Jelert & Kaito Mizuta — account for 24% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
41.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
20% reach final third
22% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 80% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it.20% of progressive passes reached the final third and 22% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 24% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.
Which lanes actually create the threat
Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.
Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingbalanced
Angers
Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 45 progressive passes across 1 match (45.0/game).
Origin lane
Right wing
36%
Right half-space
7%
Central
4%
Left half-space
9%
Left wing
44%
Progression is left-dominant: 42% right side · 4% central · 53% left.
Who generates it
Joseph Kalulu
13 · 29%
Carlens Arcus
13 · 29%
Amine Sbaï
5 · 11%
Branco van den Boomen
4 · 9%
Jim Allevinah
3 · 7%
Top two — Joseph Kalulu & Carlens Arcus — account for 58% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
45.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
18% reach final third
11% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 82% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it.18% of progressive passes reached the final third and 11% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 58% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.
Which lanes actually create the threat
Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.
Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections
Chance creation — how the shots come
Le Havre
The question
Where do Le Havre's chances actually come from?
Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece. Then by how it was set up: a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box, or no pass at all (the player created it himself). So a cut-back from an attacking transition is counted apart from a cut-back in a settled attack.
15shots
1.7xG
0.11xG per shot
2big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set up
Shots
Goals
xG
xG / shot
Attacking transition13% of shots
2
0
0.09
0.04
Pass into the box / short pass
2
0
0.09
0.04
Settled attack73% of shots
11
0
1.40
0.13
Cross
3
0
0.22
0.07
Long ball
1
0
0.08
0.08
Pass into the box / short pass
7
0
1.11
0.16
Set piece13% of shots
2
0
0.17
0.08
Corner
2
0
0.17
0.08
Every attempt to create — and what came of it
Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.
Who sets the shots up
Player
Set-ups
xG created
Goals
Kaito Mizuta
6
1.12
0
Amir Richardson
4
0.23
0
Ayumu Seko
1
0.08
0
Sota Nakamura
1
0.04
0
Josh Maja
1
0.03
0
Who takes them
Player
Shots
xG
Goals
Josh Maja
2
0.88
0
Mbwana Samatta
7
0.38
0
Amir Richardson
2
0.17
0
Djibril Ouziad
1
0.12
0
Simon Ebonog
1
0.04
0
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Le Havre's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.4 of 1.7 xG, 11 of 15 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 2 of the 15 shots (13%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 15 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 1.7 xG (-1.7).
Angers
The question
Where do Angers's chances actually come from?
Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece. Then by how it was set up: a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box, or no pass at all (the player created it himself). So a cut-back from an attacking transition is counted apart from a cut-back in a settled attack.
9shots
0.7xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set up
Shots
Goals
xG
xG / shot
Attacking transition44% of shots
4
0
0.30
0.07
Pass into the box / short pass
4
0
0.30
0.07
Settled attack33% of shots
3
0
0.24
0.08
Cross
1
0
0.07
0.07
Pass into the box / short pass
2
0
0.18
0.09
Set piece22% of shots
2
0
0.11
0.06
Corner
2
0
0.11
0.06
Every attempt to create — and what came of it
Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.
Who sets the shots up
Player
Set-ups
xG created
Goals
Amine Sbaï
3
0.28
0
Amine El Ouazzani
1
0.09
0
Carlens Arcus
1
0.07
0
Louis Mouton
1
0.06
0
Jim Allevinah
1
0.05
0
Who takes them
Player
Shots
xG
Goals
Jim Allevinah
5
0.43
0
Carlens Arcus
1
0.08
0
Usman Simbakoli
1
0.06
0
Amine El Ouazzani
1
0.05
0
Harouna Djibirin
1
0.03
0
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Angers's chances, by xG, is attacking transition (0.3 of 0.7 xG, 4 of 9 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 4 of the 9 shots (44%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 9 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 0.7 xG (-0.7).
Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide
Le Havre
The question
How does Le Havre deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?
21 crosses: 7 found a team-mate (33%), 3 led to a shot (14%). 1 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back. Grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball.
Angers
The question
How does Angers deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?
17 crosses: 3 found a team-mate (18%), 1 led to a shot (6%). 2 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (50%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back. Grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball.
Crosses by Territory
Le Havre
The question
Which part of the final third does Le Havre actually cross from?
21 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline. 43% come from one territory, the advanced right wing; 1 come from the half-spaces and 0 from the centre.
Territory
Crosses
Share
Led to a shot
advanced · right wing
9
43%
2
byline · right wing
4
19%
0
byline · left wing
4
19%
1
advanced · left wing
3
14%
0
byline · right half-space
1
5%
0
Angers
The question
Which part of the final third does Angers actually cross from?
17 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline. 35% come from one territory, the byline right wing; 2 come from the half-spaces and 0 from the centre.
Territory
Crosses
Share
Led to a shot
byline · right wing
6
35%
0
byline · left wing
4
24%
0
advanced · right wing
3
18%
0
advanced · left wing
2
12%
0
advanced · left half-space
1
6%
0
byline · right half-space
1
6%
1
On-Ball Value — who moved the game
Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds. A forward pass into space is positive, a lost ball in a dangerous spot is negative. The chart adds the values up as the match goes on.
+1.68Le Havre on-ball value
+0.94Angers on-ball value
Le HavreAngersEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Le Havre — where the value came from
Passes426 actions+0.64
Carries123 actions-0.02
Dribbles14 actions+0.04
Shots15 actions+0.77
Ball wins66 actions+0.26
Angers — where the value came from
Passes512 actions+0.25
Carries125 actions+0.12
Dribbles13 actions-0.00
Shots9 actions+0.33
Ball wins50 actions+0.23
Le Havre — most on-ball value (OBV)
Player
Actions
OBV
Gauthier Gallon
40
+0.324
Amir Richardson
72
+0.274
Djibril Ouziad
48
+0.225
Simon Ebonog
64
+0.156
Mbwana Samatta
51
+0.154
Ismaïl Bouneb (lowest)
13
-0.015
Angers — most on-ball value (OBV)
Player
Actions
OBV
Branco van den Boomen
100
+0.239
Amine Sbaï
56
+0.158
Carlens Arcus
70
+0.109
Jim Allevinah
60
+0.098
Joseph Kalulu
82
+0.085
Bané Diatta (lowest)
21
-0.005
When they lose it1 section
Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die
Le Havre
Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier. Grey cells are real zones with too few attempts to trust a rate.
Loss rate by zone
How they lose it
Incomplete pass — attacking third
34
Failed forward pass
24
Failed take-on
5
Lost in the defensive third
11
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the attacking third: 43% of 44 pass attempts there are lost (19 times). Separately, 44% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Angers
Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier. Grey cells are real zones with too few attempts to trust a rate.
Loss rate by zone
How they lose it
Incomplete pass — attacking third
43
Failed forward pass
31
Failed take-on
8
Lost in the defensive third
32
Their weakest zone is the left half-space in the attacking third: 75% of 16 pass attempts there are lost (12 times). Separately, 43% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession
Out of possession
How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.
Not just press intensity, but where the 168 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.
Where defensive actions happen
Attacking third
9%
Middle third
43%
Own third
48%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 5.2 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 9% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 43% in midfield.
Where they win it back
Darker = more defensive actions.
Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.
Angers
Not just press intensity, but where the 136 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.
Where defensive actions happen
Attacking third
15%
Middle third
41%
Own third
43%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.2 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 15% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 41% in midfield.
Where they win it back
Darker = more defensive actions.
Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.
How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won
Le Havre
The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Le Havre win it back with a defensive action?
Counted over the 29 opposition possessions that Le Havre ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge. Fewer passes and seconds means the ball is won quickly (a press); more means the opponent is allowed to play before Le Havre step in. Le Havre win it after 4.5 opponent passes in the first half-hour and after 5.3 after the hour mark (later).
PASSES THEY GET
4.6passes
median 4 · before Le Havre win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
16sec
median 8s · 29.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
28%
41%
24%
7%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.2
7s
15–30′
5.5
21s
30–45+′
4.7
14s
45–60′
3.8
9s
60–75′
8.7
53s
75–90+′
2.8
6s
average passesaverage seconds
Angers
The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Angers win it back with a defensive action?
Counted over the 30 opposition possessions that Angers ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge. Fewer passes and seconds means the ball is won quickly (a press); more means the opponent is allowed to play before Angers step in. Angers win it after 5.4 opponent passes in the first half-hour and after 2.8 after the hour mark (sooner).
PASSES THEY GET
5.1passes
median 4 · before Angers win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
16sec
median 12s · 30.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
37%
27%
17%
20%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
5.4
18s
15–30′
5.4
15s
30–45+′
9.8
31s
45–60′
too few
60–75′
too few
75–90+′
2.1
7s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections
Defensive Action Map
Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap a dot for the detail.
Le Havre — 168 actions, 135 won
Angers — 136 actions, 101 won
Ball-Win Map
Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.
Le Havre — 101 wins · 3% in the final third, 37% midfield, 60% own third
Highest wins
Type
Min
x
Mbwana Samatta
ball-recovery
3′
77
Ayumu Seko
ball-recovery
6′
71
Sota Nakamura
tackle
6′
67
Amir Richardson
ball-recovery
22′
64
Simon Ebonog
ball-recovery
41′
62
Angers — 76 wins · 8% in the final third, 29% midfield, 63% own third
Highest wins
Type
Min
x
Amine Sbaï
ball-recovery
13′
94
Louis Mouton
ball-recovery
92′
91
Amine Sbaï
ball-recovery
56′
72
Carlens Arcus
ball-recovery
69′
71
Harouna Djibirin
ball-recovery
90′
69
Defending the box1 section
Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them
Le Havre
The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Le Havre? 45 opponent progressive passes and 9 shots faced (0.7 xG against) in this match.
Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Le Havre)
Right wing
28%
Right half-space
11%
Central
6%
Left half-space
14%
Left wing
42%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (42% of the danger conceded).
Angers
The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Angers? 41 opponent progressive passes and 15 shots faced (1.7 xG against) in this match.
Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Angers)
Right wing
37%
Right half-space
19%
Central
15%
Left half-space
3%
Left wing
25%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (37% of the danger conceded).
Context
Shape and tactics
How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.
How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next. The numbers use every pass, carry and take-on and follow each possession in order; the one-line verdict compares the passing with the league. Tap ? for what a number means.
Le Havre
Build-up (own third)
safer, playing short, shorter passing
right 33% · centre 43% · left 24% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.154
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+8.7 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.27%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.13%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.3.0 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).73% of 48
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.33%
Progression (middle third)
safer, right-sided
right 43% · centre 28% · left 29% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.285
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+5.0 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.21%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.11%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.7 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).44% of 70
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.44%
Final third
safer, attacking the next line, less recycling
right 52% · centre 15% · left 34% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.124
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+3.1 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.20%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.15%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.3 s
Possessions ending in a shot?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).31% of 39
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.56%
Angers
Build-up (own third)
safer, touchline to touchline, left-sided
right 25% · centre 34% · left 40% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.224
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+7.9 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.19%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.15%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.3.2 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).54% of 59
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.51%
Progression (middle third)
safer, slower, longer passing
right 32% · centre 27% · left 40% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.290
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+4.1 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.19%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.13%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.3.0 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).60% of 60
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.33%
Final third
safer, touchline to touchline, longer passing
right 45% · centre 8% · left 47% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.136
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+2.1 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.22%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.15%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.8 s
Possessions ending in a shot?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).17% of 46
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.54%
Against their own norm
The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.
Le Havre
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Progressive carries63vs 47
PPDA5.2vs 4.4
Progressive passes41vs 46
Passes426vs 466
Pass accuracy82%vs 80%
Angers
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Expected goals0.65vs 1.40
PPDA4.2vs 6.2
Final-third entries48vs 39
Field tilt50%vs 42%
Defensive actions136vs 146
Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal
Le Havre
A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.
Excellent (high xT gain)
14%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
53%
Safe / backward
32%
15% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 85% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Angers
A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.
Excellent (high xT gain)
12%
Progressive
3%
Neutral / sideways
51%
Safe / backward
34%
16% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 84% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads
Players
Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.
Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Le Havre: 4 corners, 1 led to a shot; Angers: 6 corners, 2 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.
Le Havre
4Corners
1Led to a shot
5Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.17Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
Click an arrow to pick out one corner.
Angers
6Corners
2Led to a shot
6Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.11Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
Click an arrow to pick out one corner.
goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick
Who stood out — the most valuable players
Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.
Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Le Havre
Angers
Every player — the full numbers
Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.
Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
