Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportLigue 1 2026-09-13

Lille v Troyes

1.280.53expected goals
1.040.43xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (1.28 – 0.53 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Lille
Troyes
Possession (share of passes)
62.6%37.4%
Duels
4061
Duels won
42.5%49.2%
Aerial duels
2727
Aerial duels won
1314
Successful dribbles
65
Passes
650389
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Lille above the line, Troyes below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.490.981.48Dilane Bakwa — save, 0.06 xGAyase Ueda — miss, 0.07 xGTiago Santos — goal, 0.05 xGHugo Picard — miss, 0.04 xGAyase Ueda — miss, 0.14 xGJérémy Le Douaron — miss, 0.05 xGAyase Ueda — save, 0.10 xGAdrien Monfray — miss, 0.03 xGJérémy Le Douaron — miss, 0.07 xGAdrien Monfray — save, 0.06 xGAdrien Monfray — miss, 0.04 xGMouhamed Diop — miss, 0.21 xGDilane Bakwa — miss, 0.25 xGRomain Perraud — miss, 0.06 xGYacouba Koné — save, 0.04 xGGaëtan Perrin — save, 0.09 xGTiago Santos — miss, 0.03 xGEthan Mbappé — save, 0.05 xGMaurits Kjærgaard — save, 0.14 xGEthan Mbappé — save, 0.12 xGEthan Mbappé — goal, 0.13 xG1.280.53Dilane Bakwa — save, 0.02 xGOTTiago Santos — goal, 0.22 xGOTAyase Ueda — save, 0.07 xGOTAdrien Monfray — save, 0.38 xGOTYacouba Koné — save, 0.05 xGOTGaëtan Perrin — save, 0.14 xGOTEthan Mbappé — save, 0.19 xGOTMaurits Kjærgaard — save, 0.20 xGOTEthan Mbappé — save, 0.10 xGOTEthan Mbappé — goal, 0.10 xGOT1.040.430'15'30'45'60'75'90'
LilleTroyessolid = xG21 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Lille
Troyes

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Lille or Troyes got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 2 of 2 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Lille

The question
When Lille has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Lille's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 30.5% of the time on the ball30%Progression: 51.8% of the time on the ball52%Chance creation: 15.4% of the time on the ball15%Attacking transition: 2.3% of the time on the ball52%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up30.5%
Progression51.8%
Chance creation15.4%
Attacking transition2.3%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Lille spends most of its time on the ball (52% of its time on the ball).

Troyes

The question
When Troyes has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Troyes's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 9.7% of the time on the ball10%Progression: 45.8% of the time on the ball46%Chance creation: 41.6% of the time on the ball42%Attacking transition: 2.9% of the time on the ball46%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up9.7%
Progression45.8%
Chance creation41.6%
Attacking transition2.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Troyes spends most of its time on the ball (46% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Lille
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Troyes
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Lille — 814 touches
Troyes — 522 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Lille

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Lille actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
650
ACTIONS
3%8%11%8%2%8%11%8%12%12%4%3%3%2%3%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
185
ACTIONS
3%9%11%10%5%9%11%10%8%14%4%2%1%2%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left wing of the middle third (12.7% of all actions). 66% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 34% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 34% defensive, 52% middle, 14% attacking.

Troyes

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Troyes actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
389
ACTIONS
4%4%8%3%4%9%9%8%12%8%11%5%1%4%9%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
78
ACTIONS
4%3%6%1%10%12%8%12%6%9%8%6%15%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left half-space of the middle third (11.6% of all actions). 55% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 45% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 22% defensive, 46% middle, 32% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Lille leaned on their right (41%); Troyes leaned on their right (40%).

Lille
35%Left side24%Middle41%Right sideATTACKING →
L
35%24%41%
R
Troyes
39%Left side21%Middle40%Right sideATTACKING →
L
39%21%40%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Lille — 34 entries, 29% through the right wing
Left wing: 6 entries (18%)618%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 5 entries (15%)515%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 5 entries (15%)515%CENTRERight half-space: 8 entries (24%)824%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 10 entries (29%)1029%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Troyes — 48 entries, 35% through the left wing
Left wing: 17 entries (35%)1735%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 7 entries (15%)715%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 4 entries (8%)48%CENTRERight half-space: 4 entries (8%)48%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 16 entries (33%)1633%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Lille

The football question
How does Lille progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

217build-up passes attempted
89%completed
28%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

105CB · 54%
2Long Wide · 1%
70Wide → FB · 36%
16Central · 8%
CB105 · 54%
right: 57 passes, most from Ngoy57left: 48 passes, most from Alexsandro48
Long Wide2 · 1%
Wide → FB70 · 36%
left: 37 passes, most from Bentaleb37right: 33 passes, most from Özer33
Central16 · 8%
left: 11 passes, most from Özer11right: 5 passes, most from Bentaleb5
◆ Vision AI Insight
Lille build predominantly down the left, with Ngoy as the fulcrum (53 build-up passes). Only 28% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LHS def → C def (19×).

Troyes

The football question
How does Troyes progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

90build-up passes attempted
67%completed
47%reach the middle third
5%go long into the final third

Pass types

18CB · 30%
13Long Wide · 22%
24Wide → FB · 40%
5Central · 8%
CB18 · 30%
right: 14 passes, most from Monfray14left: 4 passes, most from Diaz4
Long Wide13 · 22%
left: 8 passes, most from Beach8right: 5 passes, most from Beach5
Wide → FB24 · 40%
right: 13 passes, most from Maronnier13left: 11 passes, most from Karim11
Central5 · 8%
right: 4 passes, most from Beach4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Troyes build predominantly down the right, with Beach as the fulcrum (16 build-up passes). Only 52% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a side that builds forward quickly, progressing the ball more directly. Their single most-repeated pattern is RW def → RW mid (5×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Lille

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 40 progressive passes across 1 match (40.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
32%
Right half-space
20%
Central
12%
Left half-space
12%
Left wing
22%
Progression is right-dominant: 52% right side · 12% central · 35% left.

Who generates it

Dilane Bakwa
6 · 15%
Nabil Bentaleb
5 · 12%
Romain Perraud
5 · 12%
Ngal'ayel Mukau
4 · 10%
Tiago Santos
4 · 10%
Top two — Dilane Bakwa & Nabil Bentaleb — account for 28% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
40.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
32% reach final third
28% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 68% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 32% of progressive passes reached the final third and 28% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 28% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingbalanced

Troyes

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 47 progressive passes across 1 match (47.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
45%
Right half-space
13%
Central
13%
Left half-space
6%
Left wing
23%
Progression is right-dominant: 57% right side · 13% central · 30% left.

Who generates it

Adrien Monfray
8 · 17%
Patrick Beach
7 · 15%
Kandet Diawara
5 · 11%
Hugo Picard
5 · 11%
Noah Donkor
5 · 11%
Top two — Adrien Monfray & Patrick Beach — account for 32% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
47.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
28% reach final third
15% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 72% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 28% of progressive passes reached the final third and 15% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 32% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Lille

The question
Where do Lille's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

13shots
1.3xG
0.10xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 6 shots (46%)46%6Settled attack: 6 shots (46%)46%6Set piece: 1 shots (8%)8%113SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 46% of shots610.680.11
Long ball100.140.14
Pass into the box / short pass410.420.11
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.120.12
Settled attack 46% of shots610.530.09
Cut-back110.050.05
Pass into the box / short pass300.370.12
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.110.06
Set piece 8% of shots100.070.07
Corner100.070.07

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Maurits Kjærgaard30.271
Basar Önal10.250
Nabil Bentaleb20.170
Ethan Mbappé10.140
Hákon Haraldsson10.100

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Dilane Bakwa20.310
Ayase Ueda30.310
Ethan Mbappé30.301
Maurits Kjærgaard10.140
Gaëtan Perrin10.090
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Lille's chances, by xG, is attacking transition (0.7 of 1.3 xG, 6 of 13 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 6 of the 13 shots (46%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 1 of the 13 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 1.3 xG (+0.7).

Troyes

The question
Where do Troyes's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

8shots
0.5xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Attacking transition: 1 shots (12%)12%1Settled attack: 4 shots (50%)50%4Set piece: 3 shots (38%)38%38SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 12% of shots100.040.04
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.040.04
Settled attack 50% of shots400.190.05
Cross100.050.05
Pass into the box / short pass300.140.05
Set piece 38% of shots300.310.10
Corner300.310.10

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Antoine Mille10.070
Lucas Maronnier10.050
Adrien Monfray10.040
Hugo Picard10.030

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Mouhamed Diop10.210
Adrien Monfray30.120
Jérémy Le Douaron20.120
Yacouba Koné10.040
Hugo Picard10.040
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Troyes's chances, by xG, is set piece (0.3 of 0.5 xG, 3 of 8 shots), mostly corner. 1 of the 8 shots (12%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 8 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 0.5 xG (-0.5).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Lille

The question
How does Lille deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

8 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (62%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 4 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (50%), 1 led to a shot (25%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Troyes

The question
How does Troyes deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

15 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (27%), 1 led to a shot (7%). 2 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Lille

The question
Which part of the final third does Lille actually cross from?

8 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (12%)12%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 4 crosses (50%)50%4advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (25%)25%2byline right wing: 1 crosses (12%)12%1byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 0 crosses (0%)
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing450%0
advanced · left wing225%0
deep · right wing112%0
byline · right wing112%0

Troyes

The question
Which part of the final third does Troyes actually cross from?

15 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 2 crosses (13%)13%2deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 3 crosses (20%)20%3byline right wing: 5 crosses (33%)33%5byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 1 crosses (7%)7%1byline left wing: 4 crosses (27%)27%4
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing533%1
byline · left wing427%0
advanced · left wing320%0
deep · right wing213%0
byline · left half-space17%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+1.58Lille on-ball value
+0.55Troyes on-ball value
+0.0+0.8+1.7HALF TIME+1.58+0.550′15′30′45′60′75′90′
LilleTroyesEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Lille — where the value came from
Passes650 actions+1.12
Carries185 actions-0.25
Dribbles27 actions+0.04
Shots13 actions+0.38
Ball wins63 actions+0.28
Troyes — where the value came from
Passes389 actions+0.14
Carries78 actions+0.14
Dribbles11 actions-0.19
Shots8 actions+0.22
Ball wins65 actions+0.25
Lille — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Basar Önal47+0.474
Ethan Mbappé19+0.426
Maurits Kjærgaard27+0.279
Ayase Ueda26+0.276
Nabil Bentaleb98+0.228
Dilane Bakwa (lowest)64-0.352
Troyes — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Mouhamed Diop59+0.202
Patrick Beach33+0.165
Adrien Monfray60+0.155
Lucas Maronnier26+0.056
Antoine Mille47+0.051
Anis Ouzenadji (lowest)54-0.210
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Lille

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

3 of 20 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%3/20Santos6 of 54 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%6/54Santos9 of 74 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%9/74Özer3 of 55 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%3/55Alexsandro14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.5 of 54 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%5/54Bakwa6 of 70 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%6/70Bentaleb5 of 54 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%5/54Alexsandro7 of 79 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%7/79Alexsandro7 of 81 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%7/81Perraud5 of 27 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%5/27Bakwa5 of 17 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%5/17Santos4 of 19 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%4/19Bentaleb12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 of 20 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%3/20Önalattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
19
Failed forward pass
13
Failed take-on
21
Lost in the defensive third
24
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the attacking third: 29% of 17 pass attempts there are lost (5 times). Separately, 26% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Troyes

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

5 of 17 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%5/17Maronnier2 of 15 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%2/15Maronnier12 of 33 pass attempts lost here (36%).36%12/33Beach10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 of 15 pass attempts lost here (53%).53%8/15Ouzenadji11 of 35 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%11/35Monfray5 of 36 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%5/36Monfray7 of 33 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%7/33Douaron8 of 45 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%8/45Douaron2 of 30 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%2/30Ouzenadji6 of 44 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%6/44Diawara6 of 20 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%6/20Karim5 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 of 17 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%4/17Mille15 of 34 pass attempts lost here (44%).44%15/34Ouzenadjiattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
33
Failed forward pass
21
Failed take-on
6
Lost in the defensive third
30
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 53% of 15 pass attempts there are lost (8 times). Separately, 34% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Lille

Not just press intensity, but where the 164 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
10%
Middle third
41%
Own third
48%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.7 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 10% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 41% in midfield.

Where they win it back

1118211712151710101686DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

Troyes

Not just press intensity, but where the 156 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
18%
Middle third
42%
Own third
40%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 6.5 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 18% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 42% in midfield.

Where they win it back

882010161482015945793DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Lille

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Lille win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 40 opposition possessions that Lille ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
3.6passes
median 2 · before Lille win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
12sec
median 6s · 40.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
52%
32%
8%
8%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
2.2
8s
15–30′
3.7
17s
30–45+′
4.6
14s
45–60′
8.5
26s
60–75′
2.2
7s
75–90+′
2.0
3s
average passesaverage seconds

Troyes

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Troyes win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 34 opposition possessions that Troyes ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
7.1passes
median 6 · before Troyes win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
20sec
median 12s · 34.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
35%
15%
18%
32%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
6.3
21s
15–30′
4.6
13s
30–45+′
10.3
32s
45–60′
5.4
10s
60–75′
9.0
21s
75–90+′
3.5
8s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Lille — 164 actions, 130 won
Troyes — 156 actions, 105 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Lille — 93 wins · 3% in the final third, 34% midfield, 62% own third
own third, right: 20 of 93 wins (22%)22%20 winsown third, centre: 18 of 93 wins (19%)19%18 winsown third, left: 20 of 93 wins (22%)22%20 winsmidfield, right: 13 of 93 wins (14%)14%13 winsmidfield, centre: 8 of 93 wins (9%)9%8 winsmidfield, left: 11 of 93 wins (12%)12%11 winsfinal third, right: 2 of 93 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, centre: 0 of 93 wins (0%)final third, left: 1 of 93 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Dilane Bakwaball-recovery69′82
Dilane Bakwaball-recovery66′71
Olivier Giroudball-recovery97′70
Ngal'ayel Mukauball-recovery74′66
Basar Önaltackle69′60
Troyes — 77 wins · 8% in the final third, 35% midfield, 57% own third
own third, right: 10 of 77 wins (13%)13%10 winsown third, centre: 14 of 77 wins (18%)18%14 winsown third, left: 20 of 77 wins (26%)26%20 winsmidfield, right: 8 of 77 wins (10%)10%8 winsmidfield, centre: 14 of 77 wins (18%)18%14 winsmidfield, left: 5 of 77 wins (6%)6%5 winsfinal third, right: 2 of 77 wins (3%)3%2 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 77 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 3 of 77 wins (4%)4%3 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Hugo Picardinterception23′78
Hugo Picardball-recovery23′78
Hugo Picardtackle37′77
Antoine Milleball-recovery77′70
Dermane Karimball-recovery62′69
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Lille

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Lille? 47 opponent progressive passes and 8 shots faced (0.5 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Lille)

Right wing
38%
Right half-space
18%
Central
16%
Left half-space
5%
Left wing
24%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (38% of the danger conceded).

Troyes

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Troyes? 40 opponent progressive passes and 13 shots faced (1.3 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Troyes)

Right wing
31%
Right half-space
26%
Central
9%
Left half-space
15%
Left wing
19%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (31% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Lille

Build-up (own third)

safer, played inside, playing short

right 26% · centre 46% · left 27%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
291
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+5.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
25%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
64% of 67
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
36%
Progression (middle third)

safer, more recycling, kept on the floor

right 33% · centre 25% · left 41%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
445
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
22%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
43% of 75
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
49%
Final third

safer, shorter passing, quicker

right 48% · centre 21% · left 32%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
126
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
3%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
29% of 41
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
61%

Troyes

Build-up (own third)

safer, longer passing, attacking the next line

right 31% · centre 43% · left 26%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
103
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+20.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
11%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
46%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
51% of 55
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
56%
Progression (middle third)

safer, longer passing, slower

right 35% · centre 30% · left 36%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
220
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+5.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
16%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
44% of 71
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
55%
Final third

safer, touchline to touchline, longer passing

right 48% · centre 6% · left 46%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
155
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
17% of 36
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
61%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Lille
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Pass accuracy89%vs 83%
Passes650vs 476
PPDA3.7vs 7.0
Defensive actions164vs 149
Threat from passing7.11vs 5.58
Troyes
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Progressive carries26vs 41
Expected goals0.53vs 1.21
Final-third entries48vs 43
Progressive passes47vs 43
Threat from passing5.49vs 6.12

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Lille

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
12%
Progressive
0%
Neutral / sideways
49%
Safe / backward
39%
12% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 88% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Troyes

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
19%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
46%
Safe / backward
34%
20% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 80% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Lille: 2 corners, 1 led to a shot; Troyes: 5 corners, 1 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Lille

2Corners
1Led to a shot
7Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.07Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
50%50%1 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Troyes

5Corners
1Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.31Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
40%2 corners20%1 corner20%20%4 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Lille
Troyes

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report