Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportLigue 1 2026-09-05

Le Havre v Brest

Le HavreHome
1–2
BrestAway
2.212.42expected goals
1.692.95xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (2.21 – 2.42 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Le Havre
Brest
Possession (share of passes)
55.9%44.1%
Duels
5767
Duels won
50.9%41.8%
Aerial duels
3535
Aerial duels won
1817
Successful dribbles
93
Passes
514405
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Le Havre above the line, Brest below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
1.132.263.39Josh Maja — miss, 0.08 xGAhmed Touba — save, 0.07 xGKamory Doumbia — goal, 0.79 xGMbwana Samatta — post, 0.09 xGPathé Mboup — save, 0.05 xGRaphaël Le Guen — miss, 0.04 xGMama Baldé — miss, 0.14 xGPathé Mboup — save, 0.04 xGMbwana Samatta — save, 0.10 xGRassoul Ndiaye — save, 0.10 xGMbwana Samatta — miss, 0.04 xGAmir Richardson — miss, 0.03 xGRassoul Ndiaye — save, 0.05 xGTimothée Pembélé — miss, 0.06 xGHugo Magnetti — save, 0.05 xGLudovic Ajorque — miss, 0.08 xGMama Baldé — save, 0.06 xGTimothée Pembélé — miss, 0.07 xGKamory Doumbia — goal, 0.30 xGKamory Doumbia — miss, 0.30 xGRayan Fofana — miss, 0.08 xGPathé Mboup — miss, 0.08 xGRaphaël Le Guen — miss, 0.04 xGLuck Zogbé — save, 0.05 xGMbwana Samatta — save, 0.04 xGPathé Mboup — save, 0.07 xGSota Nakamura — miss, 0.06 xGRayan Fofana — goal, 0.79 xGNoah Edjouma — save, 0.04 xGLudovic Ajorque — save, 0.08 xGAmir Richardson — save, 0.03 xGLudovic Ajorque — miss, 0.03 xGGiovani Versini — miss, 0.10 xGJoris Chotard — save, 0.08 xGDjibril Ouziad — miss, 0.05 xGRayan Fofana — save, 0.18 xGAyumu Seko — miss, 0.30 xG2.212.42Ahmed Touba — save, 0.06 xGOTKamory Doumbia — goal, 0.99 xGOTPathé Mboup — save, 0.18 xGOTPathé Mboup — save, 0.12 xGOTMbwana Samatta — save, 0.03 xGOTRassoul Ndiaye — save, 0.06 xGOTRassoul Ndiaye — save, 0.20 xGOTHugo Magnetti — save, 0.40 xGOTMama Baldé — save, 0.31 xGOTKamory Doumbia — goal, 0.70 xGOTLuck Zogbé — save, 0.05 xGOTMbwana Samatta — save, 0.29 xGOTPathé Mboup — save, 0.05 xGOTRayan Fofana — goal, 0.97 xGOTNoah Edjouma — save, 0.02 xGOTLudovic Ajorque — save, 0.11 xGOTAmir Richardson — save, 0.02 xGOTJoris Chotard — save, 0.02 xGOTRayan Fofana — save, 0.06 xGOT1.692.950'15'30'45'60'75'90'
Le HavreBrestsolid = xG37 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Le Havre
Brest

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Le Havre or Brest got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 3 of 3 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Le Havre

The question
When Le Havre has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Le Havre's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 25.4% of the time on the ball25%Progression: 37.8% of the time on the ball38%Chance creation: 34.5% of the time on the ball34%Attacking transition: 2.3% of the time on the ball38%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up25.4%
Progression37.8%
Chance creation34.5%
Attacking transition2.3%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Le Havre spends most of its time on the ball (38% of its time on the ball).

Brest

The question
When Brest has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Brest's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 28.8% of the time on the ball29%Progression: 55.4% of the time on the ball55%Chance creation: 15.7% of the time on the ball16%55%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up28.8%
Progression55.4%
Chance creation15.7%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Brest spends most of its time on the ball (55% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Le Havre
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Brest
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Le Havre — 696 touches
Brest — 597 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Le Havre

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Le Havre actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
514
ACTIONS
3%5%10%7%4%6%7%11%9%8%9%5%4%6%5%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
115
ACTIONS
2%6%8%11%5%5%10%16%6%8%10%2%3%3%4%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (11.8% of all actions). 64% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 36% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 30% defensive, 42% middle, 28% attacking.

Brest

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Brest actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
405
ACTIONS
5%4%11%5%6%19%10%9%8%7%7%3%2%1%2%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
119
ACTIONS
5%3%14%4%5%16%5%13%7%13%4%3%3%2%4%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the right wing of the middle third (18.3% of all actions). 54% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 46% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 31% defensive, 53% middle, 16% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Le Havre leaned on their left (38%); Brest leaned on their right (53%).

Le Havre
38%Left side26%Middle36%Right sideATTACKING →
L
38%26%36%
R
Brest
21%Left side26%Middle53%Right sideATTACKING →
L
21%26%53%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Le Havre — 56 entries, 25% through the right wing
Left wing: 13 entries (23%)1323%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 13 entries (23%)1323%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 8 entries (14%)814%CENTRERight half-space: 8 entries (14%)814%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 14 entries (25%)1425%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Brest — 35 entries, 31% through the right wing
Left wing: 8 entries (23%)823%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 4 entries (11%)411%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 4 entries (11%)411%CENTRERight half-space: 8 entries (23%)823%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 11 entries (31%)1131%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Le Havre

The football question
How does Le Havre progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

151build-up passes attempted
84%completed
27%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third

Pass types

54CB · 43%
9Long Wide · 7%
57Wide → FB · 45%
7Central · 6%

Sequence success — build-up

25build-up sequences in this match
8%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
44%turned over with nothing to show
CB54 · 43%
right: 30 passes, most from Seko30left: 24 passes, most from Touba24
Long Wide9 · 7%
left: 5 passes, most from Mpasi5right: 4 passes, most from Mpasi4
Wide → FB57 · 45%
left: 31 passes, most from Mpasi31right: 26 passes, most from Mpasi26
Central7 · 6%
left: 5 passes, most from Richardson5right: 2 passes, most from Mpasi2
◆ Vision AI Insight
Le Havre build predominantly down the left, with Mpasi as the fulcrum (38 build-up passes). Only 28% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (15×).

Brest

The football question
How does Brest progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

125build-up passes attempted
71%completed
34%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

38CB · 43%
8Long Wide · 9%
5Long Central · 6%
33Wide → FB · 37%
5Central · 6%

Sequence success — build-up

26build-up sequences in this match
4%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
62%turned over with nothing to show
CB38 · 43%
left: 24 passes, most from Lloris24right: 14 passes, most from Guen14
Long Wide8 · 9%
right: 5 passes, most from Chotard5left: 3 passes, most from Selvik3
Long Central5 · 6%
right: 3 passes, most from Selvik3left: 2 passes, most from Selvik2
Wide → FB33 · 37%
right: 18 passes, most from Chotard18left: 15 passes, most from Chotard15
Central5 · 6%
right: 4 passes, most from Lala4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Brest build predominantly down the left, with Lloris as the fulcrum (16 build-up passes). Only 35% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LHS def → C def (6×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Le Havre

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 56 progressive passes across 1 match (56.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
30%
Right half-space
14%
Central
9%
Left half-space
12%
Left wing
34%
Progression is left-dominant: 45% right side · 9% central · 46% left.

Who generates it

Ahmed Touba
8 · 14%
Amir Richardson
8 · 14%
Elias Jelert
8 · 14%
Enzo Koffi
7 · 12%
Lionel Mpasi
6 · 11%
Top two — Ahmed Touba & Amir Richardson — account for 29% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
56.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
32% reach final third
30% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 68% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 32% of progressive passes reached the final third and 30% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 29% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient

Brest

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 44 progressive passes across 1 match (44.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
57%
Right half-space
9%
Central
18%
Left half-space
5%
Left wing
11%
Progression is right-dominant: 66% right side · 18% central · 16% left.

Who generates it

Luck Zogbé
12 · 27%
Egil Selvik
8 · 18%
Joris Chotard
6 · 14%
Mama Baldé
4 · 9%
Bradley Locko
4 · 9%
Top two — Luck Zogbé & Egil Selvik — account for 45% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
44.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
30% reach final third
23% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 70% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 30% of progressive passes reached the final third and 23% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 45% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralefficient
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Le Havre

The question
Where do Le Havre's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

18shots
2.2xG
0.12xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (17%)17%3Settled attack: 14 shots (78%)78%14Set piece: 1 shots (6%)6%118SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 17% of shots300.180.06
Cross100.100.10
Pass into the box / short pass200.090.04
Settled attack 78% of shots1401.230.09
Cross700.490.07
Cut-back200.470.24
Long ball100.060.06
Pass into the box / short pass200.100.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.100.05
Set piece 6% of shots110.790.79
Penalty110.790.79

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Ahmed Touba20.470
Rassoul Ndiaye30.230
Amir Richardson20.160
Ayumu Seko20.140
Enzo Koffi20.120

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Rayan Fofana31.051
Ayumu Seko10.300
Mbwana Samatta40.270
Rassoul Ndiaye20.150
Timothée Pembélé20.130
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Le Havre's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.2 of 2.2 xG, 14 of 18 shots), mostly cross. 3 of the 18 shots (17%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 1 of the 18 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 2.2 xG (-1.2).

Brest

The question
Where do Brest's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

19shots
2.4xG
0.13xG per shot
2big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 6 shots (32%)32%6Settled attack: 9 shots (47%)47%9Set piece: 4 shots (21%)21%419SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 32% of shots610.920.15
Cut-back110.300.30
Pass into the box / short pass300.240.08
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.370.19
Settled attack 47% of shots900.580.06
Cross200.130.06
Long ball100.040.04
Pass into the box / short pass400.340.08
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.070.04
Set piece 21% of shots410.920.23
Corner300.130.04
Penalty110.790.79

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Mama Baldé10.301
Ludovic Ajorque20.220
Bradley Locko20.130
Lucas Tousart10.100
Kamory Doumbia20.090

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Kamory Doumbia31.392
Pathé Mboup40.240
Mama Baldé20.200
Ludovic Ajorque30.180
Giovani Versini10.100
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Brest's chances, by xG, is set piece (0.9 of 2.4 xG, 4 of 19 shots), mostly penalty. 6 of the 19 shots (32%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 4 of the 19 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 2.4 xG (-0.4).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Le Havre

The question
How does Le Havre deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

28 crosses: 14 found a team-mate (50%), 8 led to a shot (29%). 4 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (25%), 1 led to a shot (25%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Brest

The question
How does Brest deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

14 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (29%), 1 led to a shot (7%). 1 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (100%), 1 led to a shot (100%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Le Havre

The question
Which part of the final third does Le Havre actually cross from?

28 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 2 crosses (7%)7%2advanced right wing: 10 crosses (36%)36%10advanced right half-space: 1 crosses (4%)4%1advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 1 crosses (4%)4%1advanced left wing: 8 crosses (29%)29%8byline right wing: 1 crosses (4%)4%1byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 1 crosses (4%)4%1byline left wing: 4 crosses (14%)14%4
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing1036%4
advanced · left wing829%1
byline · left wing414%2
deep · left wing27%1
advanced · right half-space14%0
advanced · left half-space14%0
byline · right wing14%0
byline · left half-space14%0

Brest

The question
Which part of the final third does Brest actually cross from?

14 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (7%)7%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 2 crosses (14%)14%2advanced right wing: 4 crosses (29%)29%4advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (14%)14%2byline right wing: 5 crosses (36%)36%5byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 0 crosses (0%)
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing536%0
advanced · right wing429%0
deep · left wing214%1
advanced · left wing214%0
deep · right wing17%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+2.01Le Havre on-ball value
+2.89Brest on-ball value
+0.0+1.5+3.0HALF TIME+2.01+2.890′15′30′45′60′75′90′
Le HavreBrestEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Le Havre — where the value came from
Passes514 actions+0.60
Carries115 actions+0.16
Dribbles28 actions-0.01
Shots18 actions+1.09
Ball wins64 actions+0.17
Brest — where the value came from
Passes405 actions+0.56
Carries119 actions+0.22
Dribbles12 actions+0.00
Shots19 actions+1.70
Ball wins69 actions+0.40
Le Havre — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Rayan Fofana14+0.845
Ahmed Touba86+0.310
Amir Richardson97+0.261
Simon Ebonog88+0.221
Rassoul Ndiaye41+0.170
Mbwana Samatta (lowest)46-0.107
Brest — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Kamory Doumbia52+1.323
Mama Baldé43+0.410
Pathé Mboup39+0.294
Lucas Tousart5+0.239
Luck Zogbé58+0.173
Joris Chotard (lowest)78-0.134
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Le Havre

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

4 of 15 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%4/15Seko3 of 26 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%3/26Mpasi7 of 49 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%7/49Mpasi2 of 38 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%2/38Touba8 of 23 pass attempts lost here (35%).35%8/23Touba3 of 31 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%3/31Nakamura3 of 36 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%3/36Maja8 of 56 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%8/56Richardson10 of 48 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%10/48Samatta7 of 43 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%7/43Touba14 of 46 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%14/46Jelert7 of 25 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%7/25Ebonog6 of 19 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%6/19Samatta11 of 31 pass attempts lost here (35%).35%11/31Pembélé10 of 28 pass attempts lost here (36%).36%10/28Ndiayeattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
48
Failed forward pass
35
Failed take-on
19
Lost in the defensive third
24
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the attacking third: 36% of 28 pass attempts there are lost (10 times). Separately, 47% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Brest

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

5 of 20 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%5/20Zogbé5 of 17 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%5/17Selvik13 of 43 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%13/43Selvik5 of 21 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%5/21Lloris8 of 24 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%8/24Locko14 of 77 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%14/77Lala10 of 40 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%10/40Guen7 of 36 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%7/36Chotard9 of 33 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%9/33Mboup3 of 27 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%3/27Magnetti11 of 30 pass attempts lost here (37%).37%11/30Chotard14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.5 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.attacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
19
Failed forward pass
17
Failed take-on
9
Lost in the defensive third
36
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the attacking third: 37% of 30 pass attempts there are lost (11 times). Separately, 19% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Le Havre

Not just press intensity, but where the 174 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
16%
Middle third
44%
Own third
40%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.4 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 16% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 44% in midfield.

Where they win it back

51827185131715278656DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

Brest

Not just press intensity, but where the 201 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
12%
Middle third
34%
Own third
54%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.1 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 12% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 34% in midfield.

Where they win it back

2420331418121414226885DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Le Havre

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Le Havre win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 35 opposition possessions that Le Havre ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.5passes
median 2 · before Le Havre win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
13sec
median 5s · 35.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
51%
23%
6%
20%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.2
12s
15–30′
7.6
22s
30–45+′
4.8
14s
45–60′

too few
60–75′
6.5
25s
75–90+′
2.1
4s
average passesaverage seconds

Brest

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Brest win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 42 opposition possessions that Brest ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.3passes
median 3 · before Brest win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
12sec
median 8s · 42.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
45%
24%
26%
5%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.8
10s
15–30′
7.6
23s
30–45+′
3.7
10s
45–60′
4.6
14s
60–75′
3.3
8s
75–90+′
3.2
11s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Le Havre — 174 actions, 131 won
Brest — 201 actions, 144 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Le Havre — 89 wins · 2% in the final third, 42% midfield, 56% own third
own third, right: 3 of 89 wins (3%)3%3 winsown third, centre: 17 of 89 wins (19%)19%17 winsown third, left: 30 of 89 wins (34%)34%30 winsmidfield, right: 6 of 89 wins (7%)7%6 winsmidfield, centre: 12 of 89 wins (13%)13%12 winsmidfield, left: 19 of 89 wins (21%)21%19 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 89 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 0 of 89 wins (0%)final third, left: 1 of 89 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Rassoul Ndiayeball-recovery43′78
Mbwana Samattaball-recovery90′73
Ahmed Toubainterception74′66
Simon Ebonogball-recovery52′66
Simon Ebonogball-recovery43′61
Brest — 102 wins · 4% in the final third, 32% midfield, 64% own third
own third, right: 21 of 102 wins (21%)21%21 winsown third, centre: 32 of 102 wins (31%)31%32 winsown third, left: 12 of 102 wins (12%)12%12 winsmidfield, right: 11 of 102 wins (11%)11%11 winsmidfield, centre: 9 of 102 wins (9%)9%9 winsmidfield, left: 13 of 102 wins (13%)13%13 winsfinal third, right: 2 of 102 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 102 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 1 of 102 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Giovani Versinitackle82′76
Mama Baldéball-recovery18′72
Ludovic Ajorquetackle9′68
Pathé Mboupball-recovery41′68
Bradley Lockointerception42′63
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Le Havre

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Le Havre? 44 opponent progressive passes and 19 shots faced (2.4 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Le Havre)

Right wing
51%
Right half-space
7%
Central
24%
Left half-space
4%
Left wing
14%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (51% of the danger conceded).

Brest

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Brest? 56 opponent progressive passes and 18 shots faced (2.2 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Brest)

Right wing
29%
Right half-space
13%
Central
9%
Left half-space
9%
Left wing
41%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (41% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Le Havre

Build-up (own third)

safer, left-sided

right 23% · centre 37% · left 39%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
190
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+10.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
19%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
69% of 64
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
38%
Progression (middle third)

safer, left-sided

right 30% · centre 34% · left 37%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
271
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+5.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
12%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
62% of 78
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
37%
Final third

safer, narrow, central

right 45% · centre 17% · left 38%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
196
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
13%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
25% of 61
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
54%

Brest

Build-up (own third)

safer, touchline to touchline, slower

right 27% · centre 40% · left 33%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
162
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+13.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
32%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
52% of 63
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
46%
Progression (middle third)

right-sided, safer, touchline to touchline

right 51% · centre 23% · left 26%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
282
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
37% of 70
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
59%
Final third

safer, longer passing, right-sided

right 58% · centre 18% · left 24%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
92
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
22%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
19%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
33% of 39
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
44%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Le Havre
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Threat from passing10.28vs 6.36
Progressive passes56vs 44
Final-third entries56vs 40
PPDA3.4vs 4.7
Field tilt64%vs 49%
Brest
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Defensive actions201vs 166
Pass accuracy76%vs 80%
Passes405vs 467
Field tilt36%vs 45%
Expected goals2.42vs 1.78

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Le Havre

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
17%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
47%
Safe / backward
34%
18% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 82% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Brest

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
13%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
52%
Safe / backward
34%
14% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 86% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Le Havre: 5 corners, 0 led to a shot; Brest: 5 corners, 3 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Le Havre

5Corners
0Led to a shot
11Free kicks, their half
0Set-piece shots
0.00Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
40%20%1 corner20%20%1 from the left flag4 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Brest

5Corners
3Led to a shot
3Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.13Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
20%40%2 corners20%20%0 from the left flag5 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Le Havre
Brest

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report