Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportLigue 1 2026-09-03

Toulouse v Lille

ToulouseHome
0–1
LilleAway
3.221.09expected goals
2.811.35xG on target (xGOT)

Lille won the match; Toulouse won the chances (3.22 – 1.09 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Toulouse
Lille
Possession (share of passes)
53.5%46.5%
Duels
3643
Duels won
41.7%51.2%
Aerial duels
1717
Aerial duels won
710
Successful dribbles
87
Passes
561487
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Toulouse above the line, Lille below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
1.232.473.70Osame Sahraoui — save, 0.12 xGCristian Cásseres — post, 0.03 xGEthan Mbappé — save, 0.16 xGSantiago Hidalgo — save, 0.10 xGThomas Jørgensen — save, 0.04 xGJacen Russell-Rowe — save, 0.05 xGAlexis Vossah — miss, 0.04 xGSantiago Hidalgo — save, 0.05 xGAlexis Vossah — miss, 0.04 xGJacen Russell-Rowe — miss, 0.05 xGIlyas Azizi — save, 0.05 xGTiago Santos — miss, 0.06 xGTiago Santos — save, 0.02 xGCalvin Verdonk — miss, 0.03 xGSantiago Hidalgo — save, 0.08 xGJacen Russell-Rowe — save, 0.70 xGSantiago Hidalgo — save, 0.16 xGRasmus Nicolaisen — miss, 0.04 xGAlexis Vossah — miss, 0.03 xGJacen Russell-Rowe — save, 0.12 xGCristian Cásseres — miss, 0.13 xGOsame Sahraoui — save, 0.07 xGSantiago Hidalgo — save, 0.03 xGRasmus Nicolaisen — miss, 0.07 xGChrist Tapé — save, 0.55 xGAyase Ueda — save, 0.25 xGAyase Ueda — goal, 0.25 xGCasper Tengstedt — miss, 0.61 xGDilane Bakwa — save, 0.07 xGCasper Tengstedt — miss, 0.05 xGCristian Cásseres — save, 0.04 xGNgal'ayel Mukau — save, 0.07 xGCasper Tengstedt — save, 0.07 xGIlyas Azizi — miss, 0.12 xG3.221.09Osame Sahraoui — save, 0.31 xGOTEthan Mbappé — save, 0.12 xGOTSantiago Hidalgo — save, 0.20 xGOTThomas Jørgensen — save, 0.02 xGOTJacen Russell-Rowe — save, 0.05 xGOTSantiago Hidalgo — save, 0.17 xGOTIlyas Azizi — save, 0.20 xGOTTiago Santos — save, 0.26 xGOTSantiago Hidalgo — save, 0.08 xGOTJacen Russell-Rowe — save, 0.89 xGOTSantiago Hidalgo — save, 0.16 xGOTJacen Russell-Rowe — save, 0.23 xGOTOsame Sahraoui — save, 0.02 xGOTSantiago Hidalgo — save, 0.03 xGOTChrist Tapé — save, 0.58 xGOTAyase Ueda — save, 0.26 xGOTAyase Ueda — goal, 0.29 xGOTDilane Bakwa — save, 0.03 xGOTCristian Cásseres — save, 0.16 xGOTNgal'ayel Mukau — save, 0.05 xGOTCasper Tengstedt — save, 0.04 xGOT2.811.350'15'30'45'60'75'90'
ToulouseLillesolid = xG34 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Toulouse
Lille

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Toulouse or Lille got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 1 of 1 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Toulouse

The question
When Toulouse has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Toulouse's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 25.5% of the time on the ball25%Progression: 35.4% of the time on the ball35%Chance creation: 36.5% of the time on the ball37%Attacking transition: 2.5% of the time on the ball37%CHANCE CREATION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up25.5%
Progression35.4%
Chance creation36.5%
Attacking transition2.5%
Vision AI Model Insight
Chance creation is where Toulouse spends most of its time on the ball (37% of its time on the ball).

Lille

The question
When Lille has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Lille's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 42.0% of the time on the ball42%Progression: 40.8% of the time on the ball41%Chance creation: 13.7% of the time on the ball14%Attacking transition: 3.6% of the time on the ball4%42%BUILD-UP
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up42.0%
Progression40.8%
Chance creation13.7%
Attacking transition3.6%
Vision AI Model Insight
Build-up is where Lille spends most of its time on the ball (42% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Toulouse
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Lille
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Toulouse — 706 touches
Lille — 654 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Toulouse

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Toulouse actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
561
ACTIONS
3%5%11%6%3%10%12%12%7%3%11%6%4%3%6%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
135
ACTIONS
1%4%10%7%2%13%10%13%9%3%11%6%2%3%6%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (12.4% of all actions). 65% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 35% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 26% defensive, 45% middle, 29% attacking.

Lille

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Lille actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
487
ACTIONS
4%7%17%8%6%7%10%9%8%9%2%2%3%3%6%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
96
ACTIONS
7%10%10%7%4%10%14%6%6%10%4%1%3%1%4%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (16.1% of all actions). 66% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 34% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 42% defensive, 43% middle, 15% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Toulouse leaned on their right (46%); Lille leaned on their left (41%).

Toulouse
24%Left side30%Middle46%Right sideATTACKING →
L
24%30%46%
R
Lille
41%Left side34%Middle26%Right sideATTACKING →
L
41%34%26%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Toulouse — 60 entries, 42% through the right wing
Left wing: 9 entries (15%)915%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 8 entries (13%)813%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 9 entries (15%)915%CENTRERight half-space: 9 entries (15%)915%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 25 entries (42%)2542%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Lille — 35 entries, 29% through the left wing
Left wing: 10 entries (29%)1029%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 6 entries (17%)617%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 6 entries (17%)617%CENTRERight half-space: 5 entries (14%)514%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 8 entries (23%)823%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Toulouse

The football question
How does Toulouse progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

148build-up passes attempted
88%completed
30%reach the middle third
3%go long into the final third

Pass types

46CB · 35%
11Long Wide · 8%
1Long Central · 1%
56Wide → FB · 43%
16Central · 12%

Sequence success — build-up

25build-up sequences in this match
20%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
44%turned over with nothing to show
CB46 · 35%
left: 29 passes, most from McKenzie29right: 17 passes, most from McKenzie17
Long Wide11 · 8%
right: 7 passes, most from Diallo7left: 4 passes, most from Restes4
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB56 · 43%
left: 31 passes, most from Tapé31right: 25 passes, most from Messali25
Central16 · 12%
right: 10 passes, most from Restes10left: 6 passes, most from Restes6
◆ Vision AI Insight
Toulouse build predominantly down the left, with Restes as the fulcrum (27 build-up passes). Only 33% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (12×).

Lille

The football question
How does Lille progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

205build-up passes attempted
83%completed
22%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third

Pass types

80CB · 47%
9Long Wide · 5%
2Long Central · 1%
64Wide → FB · 38%
15Central · 9%

Sequence success — build-up

20build-up sequences in this match
5%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
40%turned over with nothing to show
CB80 · 47%
left: 42 passes, most from Alexsandro42right: 38 passes, most from Ngoy38
Long Wide9 · 5%
left: 5 passes, most from Özer5right: 4 passes, most from Özer4
Long Central2 · 1%
right: 2 passes, most from Özer2
Wide → FB64 · 38%
left: 33 passes, most from Özer33right: 31 passes, most from Özer31
Central15 · 9%
left: 9 passes, most from Bentaleb9right: 6 passes, most from Özer6
◆ Vision AI Insight
Lille build predominantly down the left, with Özer as the fulcrum (51 build-up passes). Only 24% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (16×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Toulouse

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 59 progressive passes across 1 match (59.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
34%
Right half-space
19%
Central
22%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
15%
Progression is right-dominant: 53% right side · 22% central · 25% left.

Who generates it

Cristian Cásseres
15 · 25%
Rafik Messali
6 · 10%
Rasmus Nicolaisen
5 · 8%
Niklas Schmidt
5 · 8%
Mark McKenzie
4 · 7%
Top two — Cristian Cásseres & Rafik Messali — account for 36% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
59.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
32% reach final third
24% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 68% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 32% of progressive passes reached the final third and 24% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 36% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingbalanced

Lille

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 37 progressive passes across 1 match (37.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
22%
Right half-space
24%
Central
14%
Left half-space
8%
Left wing
32%
Progression is right-dominant: 46% right side · 14% central · 41% left.

Who generates it

Calvin Verdonk
6 · 16%
Nabil Bentaleb
6 · 16%
Berke Özer
6 · 16%
Dilane Bakwa
4 · 11%
Alexsandro
3 · 8%
Top two — Calvin Verdonk & Nabil Bentaleb — account for 32% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
37.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
30% reach final third
0% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 70% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 30% of progressive passes reached the final third and 0% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 32% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Toulouse

The question
Where do Toulouse's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

24shots
3.2xG
0.13xG per shot
3big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Attacking transition: 12 shots (50%)50%12Settled attack: 7 shots (29%)29%7Set piece: 5 shots (21%)21%524SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 50% of shots1201.420.12
Long ball100.100.10
Pass into the box / short pass801.170.15
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)300.150.05
Settled attack 29% of shots701.470.21
Cross200.780.39
Long ball100.040.04
Pass into the box / short pass200.070.03
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.580.29
Set piece 21% of shots500.330.07
Corner400.300.07
Free kick100.030.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Rafik Messali20.780
Thomas Jørgensen20.650
Cristian Cásseres40.400
Niklas Schmidt20.190
Christ Tapé20.070

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Jacen Russell-Rowe40.920
Casper Tengstedt30.720
Christ Tapé10.550
Santiago Hidalgo50.420
Cristian Cásseres30.200
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Toulouse's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.5 of 3.2 xG, 7 of 24 shots), mostly cross. 12 of the 24 shots (50%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 5 of the 24 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 3.2 xG (-3.2).

Lille

The question
Where do Lille's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

10shots
1.1xG
0.11xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 4 shots (40%)40%4Settled attack: 6 shots (60%)60%610SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 40% of shots410.700.17
Pass into the box / short pass200.190.09
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)210.510.25
Settled attack 60% of shots600.400.07
Long ball100.020.02
Pass into the box / short pass500.380.08

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Hákon Haraldsson40.400
Benjamin André20.080
Dilane Bakwa10.070
Olivier Giroud10.030

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Ayase Ueda20.511
Osame Sahraoui20.180
Ethan Mbappé10.160
Tiago Santos20.070
Dilane Bakwa10.070
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Lille's chances, by xG, is attacking transition (0.7 of 1.1 xG, 4 of 10 shots), mostly own creation (carry, dribble, rebound). 4 of the 10 shots (40%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 0 of the 10 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 1.1 xG (-0.1).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Toulouse

The question
How does Toulouse deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

21 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (24%), 1 led to a shot (5%). 1 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Lille

The question
How does Lille deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

5 crosses: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 2 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (50%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Toulouse

The question
Which part of the final third does Toulouse actually cross from?

21 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 2 crosses (10%)10%2deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 7 crosses (33%)33%7advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 1 crosses (5%)5%1byline right wing: 7 crosses (33%)33%7byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 4 crosses (19%)19%4
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing733%0
byline · right wing733%0
byline · left wing419%0
deep · right wing210%1
advanced · left wing15%0

Lille

The question
Which part of the final third does Lille actually cross from?

5 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 2 crosses (40%)40%2advanced right wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 1 crosses (20%)20%1byline right wing: 1 crosses (20%)20%1byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 1 crosses (20%)20%1
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
deep · left wing240%0
advanced · left wing120%0
byline · right wing120%0
byline · left wing120%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+2.34Toulouse on-ball value
+1.19Lille on-ball value
+0.0+1.2+2.4HALF TIME+2.34+1.190′15′30′45′60′75′90′
ToulouseLilleEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Toulouse — where the value came from
Passes561 actions+0.06
Carries135 actions+0.18
Dribbles14 actions+0.02
Shots24 actions+1.67
Ball wins81 actions+0.41
Lille — where the value came from
Passes487 actions-0.07
Carries96 actions+0.08
Dribbles16 actions+0.07
Shots10 actions+0.60
Ball wins56 actions+0.52
Toulouse — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Jacen Russell-Rowe23+0.691
Christ Tapé62+0.370
Cristian Cásseres131+0.277
Ilyas Azizi48+0.229
Niklas Schmidt42+0.179
Lille — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Ayase Ueda6+0.339
Osame Sahraoui34+0.158
Berke Özer70+0.157
Dilane Bakwa35+0.141
Ngal'ayel Mukau15+0.123
Hákon Haraldsson (lowest)52-0.078
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Toulouse

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

4 of 15 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%4/15McKenzie3 of 26 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%3/26Cásseres5 of 59 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%5/59Restes2 of 31 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%2/31Cásseres4 of 17 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%4/17Tapé9 of 54 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%9/54Messali8 of 69 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%8/69Vossah4 of 68 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%4/68Azizi4 of 41 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%4/41Nicolaisen4 of 18 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%4/18Azizi15 of 61 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%15/61Vignolo8 of 31 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%8/31Cásseres2 of 22 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%2/22Hidalgo8 of 18 pass attempts lost here (44%).44%8/18Jørgensen7 of 31 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%7/31Tapéattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
40
Failed forward pass
29
Failed take-on
6
Lost in the defensive third
18
Their weakest zone is the left half-space in the attacking third: 44% of 18 pass attempts there are lost (8 times). Separately, 46% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Lille

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

9 of 21 pass attempts lost here (43%).43%9/21Ngoy3 of 34 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%3/34Özer14 of 84 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%14/84Özer3 of 39 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%3/39Alexsandro6 of 27 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%6/27Verdonk3 of 33 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%3/33Santos3 of 47 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%3/47Mbappé7 of 46 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%7/46Bentaleb5 of 38 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%5/38Alexsandro6 of 43 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%6/43Verdonk10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 of 15 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%4/15Giroud14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 of 27 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%4/27Perraudattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
14
Failed forward pass
12
Failed take-on
9
Lost in the defensive third
35
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 43% of 21 pass attempts there are lost (9 times). Separately, 19% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Toulouse

Not just press intensity, but where the 150 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
27%
Middle third
37%
Own third
35%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.8 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 27% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 37% in midfield.

Where they win it back

51125911197712714125DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

Lille

Not just press intensity, but where the 155 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
9%
Middle third
28%
Own third
63%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 7.1 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 9% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 28% in midfield.

Where they win it back

911432410889127DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Toulouse

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Toulouse win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 49 opposition possessions that Toulouse ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.0passes
median 4 · before Toulouse win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
14sec
median 7s · 49.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
41%
27%
20%
12%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
6.0
17s
15–30′
6.6
19s
30–45+′
9.0
23s
45–60′
3.6
8s
60–75′
3.6
8s
75–90+′
2.7
9s
average passesaverage seconds

Lille

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Lille win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 24 opposition possessions that Lille ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
3.8passes
median 4 · before Lille win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
10sec
median 6s · 24.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
38%
42%
17%
4%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′

too few
15–30′
2.3
8s
30–45+′
4.4
10s
45–60′

too few
60–75′
3.3
7s
75–90+′
4.1
12s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Toulouse — 150 actions, 113 won
Lille — 155 actions, 125 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Toulouse — 92 wins · 17% in the final third, 36% midfield, 47% own third
own third, right: 12 of 92 wins (13%)13%12 winsown third, centre: 23 of 92 wins (25%)25%23 winsown third, left: 8 of 92 wins (9%)9%8 winsmidfield, right: 17 of 92 wins (18%)18%17 winsmidfield, centre: 5 of 92 wins (5%)5%5 winsmidfield, left: 11 of 92 wins (12%)12%11 winsfinal third, right: 10 of 92 wins (11%)11%10 winsfinal third, centre: 3 of 92 wins (3%)3%3 winsfinal third, left: 3 of 92 wins (3%)3%3 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Jacen Russell-Roweball-recovery8′85
Cristian Cásserestackle91′78
Cristian Cásseresball-recovery93′73
Santiago Hidalgoball-recovery23′71
Jacen Russell-Roweball-recovery25′71
Lille — 92 wins · 5% in the final third, 23% midfield, 72% own third
own third, right: 12 of 92 wins (13%)13%12 winsown third, centre: 38 of 92 wins (41%)41%38 winsown third, left: 16 of 92 wins (17%)17%16 winsmidfield, right: 5 of 92 wins (5%)5%5 winsmidfield, centre: 8 of 92 wins (9%)9%8 winsmidfield, left: 8 of 92 wins (9%)9%8 winsfinal third, right: 3 of 92 wins (3%)3%3 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 92 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 1 of 92 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Hákon Haraldssonball-recovery3′82
Ethan Mbappéball-recovery55′72
Dilane Bakwaball-recovery63′70
Dilane Bakwaball-recovery49′70
Nabil Bentalebinterception61′67
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Toulouse

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Toulouse? 37 opponent progressive passes and 10 shots faced (1.1 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Toulouse)

Right wing
23%
Right half-space
20%
Central
22%
Left half-space
6%
Left wing
29%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (29% of the danger conceded).

Lille

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Lille? 59 opponent progressive passes and 24 shots faced (3.2 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Lille)

Right wing
36%
Right half-space
19%
Central
22%
Left half-space
9%
Left wing
13%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (36% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Toulouse

Build-up (own third)

safer, slower, played inside

right 24% · centre 48% · left 29%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
182
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+8.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
15%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
73% of 56
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
29%
Progression (middle third)

safer, right-sided, played inside

right 44% · centre 35% · left 21%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
318
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
59% of 70
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
41%
Final third

safer, trying to break lines, right-sided

right 56% · centre 16% · left 28%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
210
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
29% of 52
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
56%

Lille

Build-up (own third)

safer, played inside, narrow, central

right 27% · centre 45% · left 28%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
245
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+10.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
19%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
52% of 69
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
52%
Progression (middle third)

safer, kept on the floor

right 36% · centre 29% · left 35%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
259
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
6%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.4 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
43% of 56
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
50%
Final third

safer, playing short, left-sided

right 25% · centre 26% · left 48%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
95
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
5%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
1.9 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
26% of 31
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
55%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Toulouse
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Expected goals3.22vs 1.26
Threat from passing8.28vs 6.22
Field tilt68%vs 49%
Final-third entries60vs 41
Progressive passes59vs 47
Lille
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Threat from passing3.80vs 6.06
Field tilt32%vs 46%
Pass accuracy85%vs 83%
Progressive carries39vs 47
Progressive passes37vs 42

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Toulouse

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
17%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
45%
Safe / backward
37%
18% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 82% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Lille

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
11%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
51%
Safe / backward
36%
12% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 88% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Toulouse: 6 corners, 3 led to a shot; Lille: 2 corners, 0 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Toulouse

6Corners
3Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
5Set-piece shots
0.33Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
17%1 corner33%17%1 corner17%1 corner17%3 from the left flag3 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Lille

2Corners
0Led to a shot
1Free kicks, their half
0Set-piece shots
0.00Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
50%50%1 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Toulouse
Lille

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report