Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportLigue 1 2026-09-19

Toulouse v Le Havre

ToulouseHome
3–2
Le HavreAway
1.992.31expected goals
2.261.82xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (1.99 – 2.31 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Toulouse
Le Havre
Possession (share of passes)
52.7%47.3%
Duels
4856
Duels won
54.2%30.4%
Aerial duels
2424
Aerial duels won
1311
Successful dribbles
185
Passes
509456
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Toulouse above the line, Le Havre below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.881.772.65Jacen Russell-Rowe — save, 0.08 xGJosh Maja — miss, 0.46 xGIlyas Azizi — miss, 0.03 xGRayan Fofana — save, 0.07 xGAmir Richardson — miss, 0.06 xGMbwana Samatta — miss, 0.08 xGRayan Fofana — save, 0.12 xGCasper Tengstedt — miss, 0.09 xGJacen Russell-Rowe — save, 0.12 xGIlyas Azizi — save, 0.09 xGAmir Richardson — miss, 0.05 xGDjibril Ouziad — save, 0.03 xGAyumu Seko — save, 0.03 xGJosh Maja — save, 0.18 xGSimon Ebonog — save, 0.04 xGRayan Fofana — save, 0.09 xGRafik Messali — save, 0.13 xGCasper Tengstedt — save, 0.06 xGCasper Tengstedt — goal, 0.79 xGCasper Tengstedt — goal, 0.10 xGDjibril Ouziad — miss, 0.08 xGNiko Sigur — save, 0.08 xGCasper Tengstedt — miss, 0.10 xGIlyas Azizi — miss, 0.03 xGJosh Maja — goal, 0.26 xGAyumu Seko — miss, 0.07 xGThomas Jørgensen — goal, 0.18 xGJosh Maja — save, 0.09 xGMbwana Samatta — save, 0.09 xGMbwana Samatta — goal, 0.44 xGSantiago Hidalgo — save, 0.11 xGSota Nakamura — save, 0.05 xG1.992.31Jacen Russell-Rowe — save, 0.22 xGOTRayan Fofana — save, 0.29 xGOTRayan Fofana — save, 0.15 xGOTJacen Russell-Rowe — save, 0.04 xGOTIlyas Azizi — save, 0.10 xGOTDjibril Ouziad — save, 0.02 xGOTAyumu Seko — save, 0.03 xGOTJosh Maja — save, 0.07 xGOTSimon Ebonog — save, 0.02 xGOTRayan Fofana — save, 0.05 xGOTRafik Messali — save, 0.07 xGOTCasper Tengstedt — save, 0.05 xGOTCasper Tengstedt — goal, 0.95 xGOTCasper Tengstedt — goal, 0.45 xGOTNiko Sigur — save, 0.16 xGOTJosh Maja — goal, 0.19 xGOTThomas Jørgensen — goal, 0.15 xGOTJosh Maja — save, 0.05 xGOTMbwana Samatta — save, 0.07 xGOTMbwana Samatta — goal, 0.69 xGOTSantiago Hidalgo — save, 0.06 xGOTSota Nakamura — save, 0.18 xGOT2.261.820'15'30'45'60'75'90'
ToulouseLe Havresolid = xG32 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Toulouse
Le Havre

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Toulouse or Le Havre got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 5 of 5 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Toulouse

The question
When Toulouse has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Toulouse's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 27.8% of the time on the ball28%Progression: 47.7% of the time on the ball48%Chance creation: 22.1% of the time on the ball22%Attacking transition: 2.4% of the time on the ball48%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up27.8%
Progression47.7%
Chance creation22.1%
Attacking transition2.4%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Toulouse spends most of its time on the ball (48% of its time on the ball).

Le Havre

The question
When Le Havre has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Le Havre's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 31.1% of the time on the ball31%Progression: 43.6% of the time on the ball44%Chance creation: 23.1% of the time on the ball23%Attacking transition: 2.3% of the time on the ball44%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up31.1%
Progression43.6%
Chance creation23.1%
Attacking transition2.3%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Le Havre spends most of its time on the ball (44% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Toulouse
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Le Havre
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Toulouse — 676 touches
Le Havre — 630 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Toulouse

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Toulouse actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
509
ACTIONS
4%6%10%6%4%9%10%8%10%12%5%4%2%4%6%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
121
ACTIONS
2%7%6%8%8%8%12%12%12%9%6%2%3%4%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left wing of the middle third (11.1% of all actions). 61% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 39% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 30% defensive, 50% middle, 20% attacking.

Le Havre

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Le Havre actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
456
ACTIONS
7%7%12%3%6%11%9%9%8%8%8%4%2%2%4%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
100
ACTIONS
7%6%15%6%7%9%5%11%12%8%7%2%1%2%2%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (12.9% of all actions). 57% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 43% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 36% defensive, 45% middle, 19% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Toulouse leaned on their left (41%); Le Havre leaned on their right (45%).

Toulouse
41%Left side23%Middle36%Right sideATTACKING →
L
41%23%36%
R
Le Havre
22%Left side32%Middle45%Right sideATTACKING →
L
22%32%45%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Toulouse — 34 entries, 29% through the right wing
Left wing: 9 entries (26%)926%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 8 entries (24%)824%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 2 entries (6%)26%CENTRERight half-space: 5 entries (15%)515%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 10 entries (29%)1029%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Le Havre — 34 entries, 50% through the right wing
Left wing: 5 entries (15%)515%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 5 entries (15%)515%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 3 entries (9%)39%CENTRERight half-space: 4 entries (12%)412%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 17 entries (50%)1750%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Toulouse

The football question
How does Toulouse progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

152build-up passes attempted
91%completed
26%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

54CB · 39%
5Long Wide · 4%
64Wide → FB · 46%
15Central · 11%
CB54 · 39%
left: 30 passes, most from McKenzie30right: 24 passes, most from Koumbassa24
Long Wide5 · 4%
left: 5 passes, most from Sigur5
Wide → FB64 · 46%
left: 32 passes, most from Restes32right: 32 passes, most from Restes32
Central15 · 11%
right: 9 passes, most from Restes9left: 6 passes, most from Cásseres6
◆ Vision AI Insight
Toulouse build predominantly down the right, with Restes as the fulcrum (36 build-up passes). Only 26% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LHS def → C def (10×).

Le Havre

The football question
How does Le Havre progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

160build-up passes attempted
88%completed
27%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

76CB · 54%
9Long Wide · 6%
2Long Central · 1%
45Wide → FB · 32%
8Central · 6%
CB76 · 54%
right: 44 passes, most from Seko44left: 32 passes, most from Touba32
Long Wide9 · 6%
left: 6 passes, most from Gallon6right: 3 passes, most from Gallon3
Long Central2 · 1%
Wide → FB45 · 32%
right: 25 passes, most from Gallon25left: 20 passes, most from Gallon20
Central8 · 6%
right: 5 passes, most from Gallon5left: 3 passes, most from Gallon3
◆ Vision AI Insight
Le Havre build predominantly down the right, with Gallon as the fulcrum (32 build-up passes). Only 27% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (14×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Toulouse

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 42 progressive passes across 1 match (42.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
29%
Right half-space
10%
Central
12%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
40%
Progression is left-dominant: 38% right side · 12% central · 50% left.

Who generates it

Christ Tapé
9 · 21%
Rafik Messali
8 · 19%
Cristian Cásseres
6 · 14%
Mark McKenzie
5 · 12%
Seny Koumbassa
3 · 7%
Top two — Christ Tapé & Rafik Messali — account for 40% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
42.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
29% reach final third
19% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 71% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 29% of progressive passes reached the final third and 19% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 40% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient

Le Havre

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 46 progressive passes across 1 match (46.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
43%
Right half-space
11%
Central
11%
Left half-space
4%
Left wing
30%
Progression is right-dominant: 54% right side · 11% central · 35% left.

Who generates it

Djibril Ouziad
9 · 20%
Elias Jelert
8 · 17%
Ayumu Seko
7 · 15%
Mbwana Samatta
5 · 11%
Amir Richardson
3 · 7%
Top two — Djibril Ouziad & Elias Jelert — account for 37% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
46.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
20% reach final third
24% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 80% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 20% of progressive passes reached the final third and 24% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 37% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Toulouse

The question
Where do Toulouse's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

14shots
2.0xG
0.14xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
3goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (21%)21%3Settled attack: 9 shots (64%)64%9Set piece: 2 shots (14%)14%214SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 21% of shots300.260.09
Pass into the box / short pass200.160.08
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.110.11
Settled attack 64% of shots920.900.10
Cut-back310.310.10
Long ball110.180.18
Pass into the box / short pass500.410.08
Set piece 14% of shots210.830.41
Corner100.030.03
Penalty110.790.79

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Cristian Cásseres40.481
Thomas Jørgensen30.271
Casper Tengstedt20.190
Rafik Messali10.090
Christ Tapé10.030

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Casper Tengstedt51.142
Jacen Russell-Rowe20.200
Thomas Jørgensen10.181
Ilyas Azizi30.160
Rafik Messali10.130
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Toulouse's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.9 of 2.0 xG, 9 of 14 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 3 of the 14 shots (21%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 14 shots came from set pieces; 3 goals from 2.0 xG (+1.0).

Le Havre

The question
Where do Le Havre's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

18shots
2.3xG
0.13xG per shot
2big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (17%)17%3Settled attack: 13 shots (72%)72%13Set piece: 2 shots (11%)11%218SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 17% of shots300.170.06
Pass into the box / short pass300.170.06
Settled attack 72% of shots1321.990.15
Cross310.810.27
Pass into the box / short pass610.850.14
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)400.320.08
Set piece 11% of shots200.140.07
Corner200.140.07

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Sota Nakamura40.872
Mbwana Samatta10.460
Josh Maja30.240
Simon Ebonog20.140
Amir Richardson20.130

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Josh Maja40.991
Mbwana Samatta30.621
Rayan Fofana30.280
Djibril Ouziad20.110
Amir Richardson20.110
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Le Havre's chances, by xG, is settled attack (2.0 of 2.3 xG, 13 of 18 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 3 of the 18 shots (17%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 18 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 2.3 xG (-0.3).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Toulouse

The question
How does Toulouse deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

12 crosses: 3 found a team-mate (25%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 5 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (40%), 2 led to a shot (40%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Le Havre

The question
How does Le Havre deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

17 crosses: 7 found a team-mate (41%), 3 led to a shot (18%). 2 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Toulouse

The question
Which part of the final third does Toulouse actually cross from?

12 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 3 crosses (25%)25%3deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (8%)8%1advanced right wing: 2 crosses (17%)17%2advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 4 crosses (33%)33%4byline right wing: 0 crosses (0%)byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 2 crosses (17%)17%2
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · left wing433%0
deep · right wing325%0
advanced · right wing217%0
byline · left wing217%0
deep · left wing18%0

Le Havre

The question
Which part of the final third does Le Havre actually cross from?

17 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (6%)6%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 6 crosses (35%)35%6advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (12%)12%2byline right wing: 6 crosses (35%)35%6byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 2 crosses (12%)12%2
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing635%1
byline · right wing635%1
advanced · left wing212%0
byline · left wing212%1
deep · right wing16%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+2.23Toulouse on-ball value
+2.56Le Havre on-ball value
+0.0+1.3+2.6HALF TIME+2.23+2.560′15′30′45′60′75′90′
ToulouseLe HavreEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Toulouse — where the value came from
Passes509 actions-0.18
Carries121 actions+0.03
Dribbles26 actions+0.46
Shots14 actions+1.59
Ball wins59 actions+0.34
Le Havre — where the value came from
Passes456 actions+0.92
Carries100 actions+0.17
Dribbles20 actions-0.05
Shots18 actions+1.36
Ball wins51 actions+0.16
Toulouse — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Casper Tengstedt21+0.842
Thomas Jørgensen58+0.345
Rafik Messali70+0.327
Santiago Hidalgo16+0.264
Jacen Russell-Rowe40+0.186
Niko Sigur (lowest)57-0.122
Le Havre — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Josh Maja25+0.701
Mbwana Samatta32+0.683
Sota Nakamura15+0.413
Rayan Fofana28+0.305
Djibril Ouziad64+0.246
Elias Jelert (lowest)50-0.209
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Toulouse

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

5 of 21 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%5/21Koumbassa2 of 30 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%2/30Koumbassa2 of 52 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%2/52Russell-Ro3 of 30 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%3/30Cásseres2 of 19 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%2/19McKenzie9 of 47 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%9/47Messali3 of 51 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%3/51Koumbassa0 of 42 pass attempts lost here (0%).0%0/428 of 52 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%8/52McKenzie10 of 59 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%10/59Tapé11 of 27 pass attempts lost here (41%).41%11/27Messali9 of 20 pass attempts lost here (45%).45%9/20Messali12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 18 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%6/18Azizi11 of 29 pass attempts lost here (38%).38%11/29Aziziattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
41
Failed forward pass
29
Failed take-on
8
Lost in the defensive third
14
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the attacking third: 45% of 20 pass attempts there are lost (9 times). Separately, 48% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Le Havre

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

5 of 32 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%5/32Jelert5 of 31 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%5/31Gallon2 of 57 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%2/57Seko14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 26 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%6/26Touba8 of 49 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%8/49Ouziad3 of 41 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%3/41Fofana4 of 43 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%4/43Sasso2 of 36 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%2/36Richardson6 of 37 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%6/37Touba13 of 38 pass attempts lost here (34%).34%13/38Ouziad5 of 18 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%5/18Ebonog9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.5 of 16 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%5/16Jelertattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
28
Failed forward pass
19
Failed take-on
15
Lost in the defensive third
20
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the attacking third: 34% of 38 pass attempts there are lost (13 times). Separately, 39% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Toulouse

Not just press intensity, but where the 155 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
19%
Middle third
36%
Own third
45%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.8 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 19% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 36% in midfield.

Where they win it back

5934129910516167117DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

Le Havre

Not just press intensity, but where the 161 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
18%
Middle third
35%
Own third
47%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 5.2 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 18% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 35% in midfield.

Where they win it back

910371271814714613DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Toulouse

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Toulouse win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 32 opposition possessions that Toulouse ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.0passes
median 4 · before Toulouse win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
14sec
median 11s · 32.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
22%
41%
25%
12%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.3
10s
15–30′
4.5
12s
30–45+′
2.7
12s
45–60′
4.2
11s
60–75′
7.2
20s
75–90+′
6.3
19s
average passesaverage seconds

Le Havre

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Le Havre win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 27 opposition possessions that Le Havre ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.9passes
median 4 · before Le Havre win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
16sec
median 7s · 27.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
30%
41%
11%
19%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
9.7
27s
15–30′
7.0
22s
30–45+′
6.8
24s
45–60′

too few
60–75′
3.4
8s
75–90+′
5.8
13s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Toulouse — 155 actions, 116 won
Le Havre — 161 actions, 107 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Toulouse — 80 wins · 16% in the final third, 30% midfield, 54% own third
own third, right: 9 of 80 wins (11%)11%9 winsown third, centre: 26 of 80 wins (32%)32%26 winsown third, left: 8 of 80 wins (10%)10%8 winsmidfield, right: 7 of 80 wins (9%)9%7 winsmidfield, centre: 4 of 80 wins (5%)5%4 winsmidfield, left: 13 of 80 wins (16%)16%13 winsfinal third, right: 3 of 80 wins (4%)4%3 winsfinal third, centre: 5 of 80 wins (6%)6%5 winsfinal third, left: 5 of 80 wins (6%)6%5 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Seny Koumbassatackle87′98
Casper Tengstedtball-recovery0′95
Ilyas Azizitackle35′79
Sion Oppongtackle76′77
Cristian Cásseresball-recovery54′74
Le Havre — 73 wins · 5% in the final third, 23% midfield, 71% own third
own third, right: 11 of 73 wins (15%)15%11 winsown third, centre: 30 of 73 wins (41%)41%30 winsown third, left: 11 of 73 wins (15%)15%11 winsmidfield, right: 6 of 73 wins (8%)8%6 winsmidfield, centre: 5 of 73 wins (7%)7%5 winsmidfield, left: 6 of 73 wins (8%)8%6 winsfinal third, right: 1 of 73 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, centre: 2 of 73 wins (3%)3%2 winsfinal third, left: 1 of 73 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Josh Majaball-recovery2′81
Simon Ebonogball-recovery92′74
Mbwana Samattaball-recovery75′71
Simon Ebonogball-recovery89′68
Ayumu Sekotackle75′65
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Toulouse

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Toulouse? 46 opponent progressive passes and 18 shots faced (2.3 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Toulouse)

Right wing
52%
Right half-space
13%
Central
11%
Left half-space
4%
Left wing
20%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (52% of the danger conceded).

Le Havre

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Le Havre? 42 opponent progressive passes and 14 shots faced (2.0 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Le Havre)

Right wing
23%
Right half-space
9%
Central
17%
Left half-space
13%
Left wing
38%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (38% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Toulouse

Build-up (own third)

safer, shorter passing, circulating

right 27% · centre 40% · left 34%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
194
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
12%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.1 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
64% of 47
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
38%
Progression (middle third)

safer, touchline to touchline

right 35% · centre 24% · left 41%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
325
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
13%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
46% of 65
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
51%
Final third

safer, kept on the floor

right 39% · centre 17% · left 44%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
137
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.4 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
26% of 42
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
57%

Le Havre

Build-up (own third)

safer, right-sided, touchline to touchline

right 38% · centre 38% · left 24%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
209
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
61% of 59
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
47%
Progression (middle third)

safer

right 38% · centre 27% · left 35%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
254
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
42% of 59
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
44%
Final third

safer, right-sided, less recycling

right 57% · centre 19% · left 24%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
113
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
13%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
18%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.3 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
31% of 39
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
51%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Toulouse
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Threat from passing5.18vs 6.66
Final-third entries34vs 45
PPDA4.8vs 5.5
Expected goals1.99vs 1.43
Pass accuracy83%vs 85%
Le Havre
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Pass accuracy84%vs 79%
Progressive carries35vs 51
Expected goals2.31vs 1.49
PPDA5.2vs 4.4
Final-third entries34vs 43

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Toulouse

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
10%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
51%
Safe / backward
37%
12% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 88% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Le Havre

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
16%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
49%
Safe / backward
34%
17% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 83% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Toulouse: 6 corners, 1 led to a shot; Le Havre: 7 corners, 2 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Toulouse

6Corners
1Led to a shot
2Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.03Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
17%1 corner33%2 corners33%17%1 corner2 from the left flag4 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Le Havre

7Corners
2Led to a shot
5Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.14Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
14%1 corner71%14%1 corner1 from the left flag6 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Toulouse
Le Havre

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report