Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Lille above the line, Le Havre below.
xG race
Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places. Switch to xGOT (xG on target) to count only the shots that tested the goalkeeper, valued by where they went in the goal mouth, or Both to see the two together.
Show
LilleLe Havresolid = xG22 shots — click any dot
Shot map
Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.
Lille
Le Havre
Goal sequences
The move behind each goal, from the moment Lille or Le Havre got the ball to the finish. Pick a goal, then step through it or press Play: numbered circles are passes and touches, dotted lines are carries (the ball travelling with a player), dashed grey is a pass that was lost, the star is the shot.
PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 1 of 1 goals traced.
In possession
In possession
How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.
When Lille has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?
The share of Lille's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen. A phase is where the ball is on the pitch (own third, middle third, final third); a transition or a set piece skips the build-up and is counted on its own.
Phase
Share of the time
Build-up
40.1%
Progression
40.4%
Chance creation
16.8%
Attacking transition
2.7%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Lille spends most of its time on the ball (40% of its time on the ball).
Le Havre
The question
When Le Havre has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?
The share of Le Havre's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen. A phase is where the ball is on the pitch (own third, middle third, final third); a transition or a set piece skips the build-up and is counted on its own.
Phase
Share of the time
Build-up
23.0%
Progression
51.3%
Chance creation
24.5%
Attacking transition
1.2%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Le Havre spends most of its time on the ball (51% of its time on the ball).
Passing Network
Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links. Lines are this match's passes between two players, thicker for more.
Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed). Eight families per team — click any map to open it wide, then filter by channel or third, from one to another (or click a cell of the flow grids), by outcome, half, minute and passer. Channels: right wing, right half-space, centre, left half-space, left wing.
From channel
To channel
From third
To third
Outcome · half
Minutes
Channel to channel · click a cell
Third to third · click a cell
Touch Density
Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.
Lille — 590 touches
Le Havre — 652 touches
Which Zones Do They Attack Through?
Lille
The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Lille actually do its on-ball work?
Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other. Each is binned into the 15 pitch zones (three thirds × five vertical lanes) and shaded by its share of that kind of action; the arrows are the real actions.
Passes
the ball moved by a pass
440
ACTIONS
Carries
the ball moved with a player
93
ACTIONS
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (16.3% of all actions). 63% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 37% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 41% defensive, 43% middle, 15% attacking.
Le Havre
The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Le Havre actually do its on-ball work?
Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other. Each is binned into the 15 pitch zones (three thirds × five vertical lanes) and shaded by its share of that kind of action; the arrows are the real actions.
Passes
the ball moved by a pass
492
ACTIONS
Carries
the ball moved with a player
150
ACTIONS
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (14.3% of all actions). 61% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 39% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 22% defensive, 54% middle, 24% attacking.
Attack sides
Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Lille leaned on their right (51%); Le Havre leaned on their right (43%).
Lille
L
27%21%51%
R
Le Havre
L
34%24%43%
R
Final-third entries
Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.
Lille — 32 entries, 44% through the right wing
Le Havre — 40 entries, 40% through the right wing
Build-up1 section
Build-Up — the pass map
Lille
The football question
How does Lille progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?
Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central. Each gets its own panel below, so nothing competes for attention. Arrow width = volume, labelled with the exact count; hover for the top passer.
177build-up passes attempted
82%completed
23%reach the middle third
3%go long into the final third
Pass types
93CB · 64%
10Long Wide · 7%
31Wide → FB · 21%
11Central · 8%
CB93 · 64%
Long Wide10 · 7%
Wide → FB31 · 21%
Central11 · 8%
◆ Vision AI Insight
Lille build predominantly down the right, with Alexsandro as the fulcrum (37 build-up passes). Only 26% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → C def (13×).
Le Havre
The football question
How does Le Havre progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?
Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central. Each gets its own panel below, so nothing competes for attention. Arrow width = volume, labelled with the exact count; hover for the top passer.
107build-up passes attempted
85%completed
28%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third
Pass types
43CB · 47%
6Long Wide · 7%
1Long Central · 1%
31Wide → FB · 34%
10Central · 11%
CB43 · 47%
Long Wide6 · 7%
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB31 · 34%
Central10 · 11%
◆ Vision AI Insight
Le Havre build predominantly down the left, with Gallon as the fulcrum (30 build-up passes). Only 29% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LHS def → C def (9×).
Progression1 section
How They Progress — the mechanism
Lille
Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 32 progressive passes across 1 match (32.0/game).
Origin lane
Right wing
28%
Right half-space
12%
Central
25%
Left half-space
3%
Left wing
31%
Progression is right-dominant: 41% right side · 25% central · 34% left.
Who generates it
Berke Özer
7 · 22%
Calvin Verdonk
6 · 19%
Dilane Bakwa
5 · 16%
Maxima Goffi
2 · 6%
Romain Perraud
2 · 6%
Top two — Berke Özer & Calvin Verdonk — account for 41% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
32.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
31% reach final third
12% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 69% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it.31% of progressive passes reached the final third and 12% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 41% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.
Which lanes actually create the threat
Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.
Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralefficient
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingbalanced
Le Havre
Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 43 progressive passes across 1 match (43.0/game).
Origin lane
Right wing
49%
Right half-space
14%
Central
7%
Left half-space
12%
Left wing
19%
Progression is right-dominant: 63% right side · 7% central · 30% left.
Who generates it
Ayumu Seko
7 · 16%
Rassoul Ndiaye
7 · 16%
Djibril Ouziad
6 · 14%
Sota Nakamura
5 · 12%
Ahmed Touba
4 · 9%
Top two — Ayumu Seko & Rassoul Ndiaye — account for 33% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
43.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
21% reach final third
33% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 79% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it.21% of progressive passes reached the final third and 33% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 33% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.
Which lanes actually create the threat
Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.
Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingsterile
Chance creation4 sections
Chance creation — how the shots come
Lille
The question
Where do Lille's chances actually come from?
Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece. Then by how it was set up: a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box, or no pass at all (the player created it himself). So a cut-back from an attacking transition is counted apart from a cut-back in a settled attack.
5shots
0.6xG
0.13xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set up
Shots
Goals
xG
xG / shot
Settled attack60% of shots
3
1
0.38
0.13
Long ball
1
1
0.09
0.09
Pass into the box / short pass
2
0
0.29
0.14
Set piece40% of shots
2
0
0.26
0.13
Corner
1
0
0.23
0.23
Free kick
1
0
0.03
0.03
Every attempt to create — and what came of it
Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.
Who sets the shots up
Player
Set-ups
xG created
Goals
Dilane Bakwa
1
0.24
0
Tanguy Nianzou
1
0.09
1
Osame Sahraoui
1
0.04
0
Who takes them
Player
Shots
xG
Goals
Maurits Kjærgaard
1
0.24
0
Tanguy Nianzou
1
0.23
0
Dilane Bakwa
2
0.13
1
Nabil Bentaleb
1
0.03
0
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Lille's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.4 of 0.6 xG, 3 of 5 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 0 of the 5 shots (0%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 5 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 0.6 xG (+0.4).
Le Havre
The question
Where do Le Havre's chances actually come from?
Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece. Then by how it was set up: a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box, or no pass at all (the player created it himself). So a cut-back from an attacking transition is counted apart from a cut-back in a settled attack.
17shots
1.3xG
0.08xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set up
Shots
Goals
xG
xG / shot
Attacking transition6% of shots
1
0
0.05
0.05
Pass into the box / short pass
1
0
0.05
0.05
Settled attack88% of shots
15
0
1.21
0.08
Cross
5
0
0.59
0.12
Cut-back
1
0
0.17
0.17
Pass into the box / short pass
6
0
0.30
0.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)
3
0
0.16
0.05
Set piece6% of shots
1
0
0.08
0.08
Corner
1
0
0.08
0.08
Every attempt to create — and what came of it
Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.
Who sets the shots up
Player
Set-ups
xG created
Goals
Lamine N'Diaye
2
0.29
0
Rassoul Ndiaye
4
0.24
0
Simon Ebonog
3
0.22
0
Sota Nakamura
2
0.21
0
Amir Richardson
1
0.08
0
Who takes them
Player
Shots
xG
Goals
Mbwana Samatta
6
0.49
0
Josh Maja
2
0.34
0
Rassoul Ndiaye
3
0.16
0
Lamine N'Diaye
2
0.14
0
Djibril Ouziad
1
0.10
0
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Le Havre's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.2 of 1.3 xG, 15 of 17 shots), mostly cross. 1 of the 17 shots (6%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 1 of the 17 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 1.3 xG (-1.3).
Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide
Lille
Nothing to show here for Lille in this match.
Le Havre
The question
How does Le Havre deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?
21 crosses: 10 found a team-mate (48%), 4 led to a shot (19%). 2 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (50%), 1 led to a shot (50%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back. Grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball.
Crosses by Territory
Lille
The question
Which part of the final third does Lille actually cross from?
3 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline. 67% come from one territory, the advanced right wing; 0 come from the half-spaces and 0 from the centre.
Territory
Crosses
Share
Led to a shot
advanced · right wing
2
67%
0
advanced · left wing
1
33%
0
Le Havre
The question
Which part of the final third does Le Havre actually cross from?
21 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline. 43% come from one territory, the advanced right wing; 0 come from the half-spaces and 0 from the centre.
Territory
Crosses
Share
Led to a shot
advanced · right wing
9
43%
3
byline · right wing
5
24%
0
byline · left wing
4
19%
1
deep · right wing
1
5%
0
deep · left wing
1
5%
0
advanced · left wing
1
5%
0
On-Ball Value — who moved the game
Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds. A forward pass into space is positive, a lost ball in a dangerous spot is negative. The chart adds the values up as the match goes on.
+1.20Lille on-ball value
+1.77Le Havre on-ball value
LilleLe HavreEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Lille — where the value came from
Passes440 actions+0.21
Carries93 actions+0.06
Dribbles12 actions+0.04
Shots5 actions+0.55
Ball wins61 actions+0.35
Le Havre — where the value came from
Passes492 actions+0.75
Carries150 actions-0.01
Dribbles18 actions-0.02
Shots17 actions+0.72
Ball wins60 actions+0.32
Lille — most on-ball value (OBV)
Player
Actions
OBV
Dilane Bakwa
59
+0.413
Maurits Kjærgaard
54
+0.313
Tanguy Nianzou
70
+0.263
Berke Özer
43
+0.145
Nabil Bentaleb
68
+0.120
Ayase Ueda (lowest)
9
-0.449
Le Havre — most on-ball value (OBV)
Player
Actions
OBV
Mbwana Samatta
47
+0.279
Djibril Ouziad
72
+0.224
Lamine N'Diaye
68
+0.222
Rassoul Ndiaye
76
+0.213
Simon Ebonog
84
+0.211
Rayan Fofana (lowest)
1
-0.002
When they lose it1 section
Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die
Lille
Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier. Grey cells are real zones with too few attempts to trust a rate.
Loss rate by zone
How they lose it
Incomplete pass — attacking third
15
Failed forward pass
8
Failed take-on
8
Lost in the defensive third
32
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 41% of 22 pass attempts there are lost (9 times). Separately, 19% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Le Havre
Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier. Grey cells are real zones with too few attempts to trust a rate.
Loss rate by zone
How they lose it
Incomplete pass — attacking third
34
Failed forward pass
25
Failed take-on
12
Lost in the defensive third
16
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the attacking third: 43% of 21 pass attempts there are lost (9 times). Separately, 41% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession
Out of possession
How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.
Not just press intensity, but where the 147 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.
Where defensive actions happen
Attacking third
12%
Middle third
41%
Own third
48%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.7 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 12% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 41% in midfield.
Where they win it back
Darker = more defensive actions.
Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.
Le Havre
Not just press intensity, but where the 140 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.
Where defensive actions happen
Attacking third
23%
Middle third
41%
Own third
36%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.8 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 23% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 41% in midfield.
Where they win it back
Darker = more defensive actions.
Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.
How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won
Lille
The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Lille win it back with a defensive action?
Counted over the 21 opposition possessions that Lille ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge. Fewer passes and seconds means the ball is won quickly (a press); more means the opponent is allowed to play before Lille step in.
PASSES THEY GET
5.6passes
median 4 · before Lille win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
17sec
median 11s · 21.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
38%
29%
5%
29%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
5.7
13s
15–30′
too few
30–45+′
10.0
36s
45–60′
9.7
25s
60–75′
too few
75–90+′
3.5
11s
average passesaverage seconds
Le Havre
The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Le Havre win it back with a defensive action?
Counted over the 29 opposition possessions that Le Havre ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge. Fewer passes and seconds means the ball is won quickly (a press); more means the opponent is allowed to play before Le Havre step in. Le Havre win it after 6.1 opponent passes in the first half-hour and after 7.0 after the hour mark (later).
PASSES THEY GET
5.9passes
median 5 · before Le Havre win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
17sec
median 17s · 29.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
31%
28%
17%
24%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.5
11s
15–30′
10.0
27s
30–45+′
3.8
13s
45–60′
6.0
20s
60–75′
too few
75–90+′
7.7
20s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections
Defensive Action Map
Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap a dot for the detail.
Lille — 147 actions, 105 won
Le Havre — 140 actions, 104 won
Ball-Win Map
Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.
Lille — 85 wins · 8% in the final third, 31% midfield, 61% own third
Highest wins
Type
Min
x
Dilane Bakwa
tackle
71′
90
Ngal'ayel Mukau
ball-recovery
71′
87
Nabil Bentaleb
interception
93′
82
Ngal'ayel Mukau
tackle
64′
80
Dilane Bakwa
tackle
49′
75
Le Havre — 71 wins · 18% in the final third, 34% midfield, 48% own third
Highest wins
Type
Min
x
Lamine N'Diaye
tackle
96′
94
Sota Nakamura
ball-recovery
9′
93
Sota Nakamura
interception
27′
81
Djibril Ouziad
ball-recovery
15′
80
Amir Richardson
ball-recovery
47′
77
Defending the box1 section
Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them
Lille
The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Lille? 43 opponent progressive passes and 17 shots faced (1.3 xG against) in this match.
Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Lille)
Right wing
56%
Right half-space
14%
Central
6%
Left half-space
9%
Left wing
15%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (56% of the danger conceded).
Le Havre
The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Le Havre? 32 opponent progressive passes and 5 shots faced (0.6 xG against) in this match.
Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Le Havre)
Right wing
23%
Right half-space
21%
Central
27%
Left half-space
2%
Left wing
27%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (27% of the danger conceded).
Context
Shape and tactics
How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.
How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next. The numbers use every pass, carry and take-on and follow each possession in order; the one-line verdict compares the passing with the league. Tap ? for what a number means.
Lille
Build-up (own third)
safer
right 29% · centre 51% · left 20% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.222
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+8.8 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.20%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.19%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.3.1 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).53% of 62
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.47%
Progression (middle third)
safer, shorter passing
right 37% · centre 28% · left 34% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.235
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+2.9 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.13%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.8%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.6 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).39% of 56
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.61%
Final third
safer, playing short, circulating
right 65% · centre 5% · left 31% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.88
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.-0.2 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.22%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.9%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.2 s
Possessions ending in a shot?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).16% of 25
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.60%
Le Havre
Build-up (own third)
safer, left-sided, played inside
right 15% · centre 52% · left 32% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.145
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+9.9 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.24%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.20%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.3.4 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).69% of 48
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.27%
Progression (middle third)
safer
right 29% · centre 34% · left 36% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.355
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+2.9 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.24%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.9%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.3 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).44% of 70
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.46%
Final third
safer, right-sided
right 59% · centre 16% · left 24% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.160
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+2.0 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.22%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.9%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.3 s
Possessions ending in a shot?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).33% of 45
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.51%
Against their own norm
The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.
Lille
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Expected goals0.64vs 1.16
Progressive carries30vs 48
Progressive passes32vs 42
PPDA4.7vs 6.8
Final-third entries32vs 39
Le Havre
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Defensive actions140vs 167
Field tilt63%vs 50%
Pass accuracy83%vs 79%
Passes492vs 456
Threat from passing5.76vs 7.01
Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal
Lille
A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.
Excellent (high xT gain)
13%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
48%
Safe / backward
38%
14% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 86% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Le Havre
A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.
Excellent (high xT gain)
11%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
49%
Safe / backward
37%
13% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 87% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads
Players
Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.
Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Lille: 4 corners, 1 led to a shot; Le Havre: 5 corners, 1 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.
Lille
4Corners
1Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.26Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
Click an arrow to pick out one corner.
Le Havre
5Corners
1Led to a shot
9Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.08Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
Click an arrow to pick out one corner.
goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick
Who stood out — the most valuable players
Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.
Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Lille
Le Havre
Every player — the full numbers
Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.
Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
