Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportLigue 1 2026-10-10

Lorient v Paris FC

LorientHome
1–0
Paris FCAway
0.581.11expected goals
0.921.20xG on target (xGOT)

Lorient won the match; Paris FC won the chances (0.58 – 1.11 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Lorient
Paris FC
Possession (share of passes)
39.7%60.3%
Duels
4753
Duels won
55.3%34.0%
Aerial duels
3131
Aerial duels won
1912
Successful dribbles
103
Passes
489744
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Lorient above the line, Paris FC below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.460.921.37Pablo Pagis — save, 0.08 xGMaxime Lopez — miss, 0.03 xGAdama Camara — miss, 0.11 xGIlan Kebbal — save, 0.04 xGIlan Kebbal — save, 0.03 xGJean-Victor Makengo — save, 0.08 xGMontassar Talbi — save, 0.06 xGIsaak Touré — miss, 0.04 xGLuca Koleosho — save, 0.04 xGIlan Kebbal — save, 0.04 xGLassine Sinayoko — save, 0.09 xGJean-Victor Makengo — save, 0.11 xGMamadou Koné — save, 0.06 xGLassine Sinayoko — save, 0.21 xGAdama Camara — save, 0.05 xGMamadou Koné — miss, 0.04 xGGabin Bernardeau — goal, 0.16 xGPablo Pagis — miss, 0.03 xGPablo Pagis — miss, 0.06 xGArsène Kouassi — miss, 0.03 xGPablo Pagis — save, 0.02 xGRudy Matondo — save, 0.07 xGLassine Sinayoko — save, 0.11 xGOmar Sissoko — miss, 0.07 xGLuca Koleosho — save, 0.04 xG0.581.11Pablo Pagis — save, 0.17 xGOTIlan Kebbal — save, 0.14 xGOTIlan Kebbal — save, 0.03 xGOTJean-Victor Makengo — save, 0.24 xGOTMontassar Talbi — save, 0.04 xGOTLuca Koleosho — save, 0.02 xGOTIlan Kebbal — save, 0.05 xGOTLassine Sinayoko — save, 0.02 xGOTJean-Victor Makengo — save, 0.15 xGOTMamadou Koné — save, 0.04 xGOTLassine Sinayoko — save, 0.23 xGOTAdama Camara — save, 0.27 xGOTGabin Bernardeau — goal, 0.45 xGOTPablo Pagis — save, 0.06 xGOTRudy Matondo — save, 0.16 xGOTLassine Sinayoko — save, 0.03 xGOTLuca Koleosho — save, 0.02 xGOT0.921.200'15'30'45'60'75'90'
LorientParis FCsolid = xG25 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Lorient
Paris FC

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Lorient or Paris FC got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 1 of 1 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Lorient

The question
When Lorient has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Lorient's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 46.0% of the time on the ball46%Progression: 40.1% of the time on the ball40%Chance creation: 12.8% of the time on the ball13%Attacking transition: 1.2% of the time on the ball46%BUILD-UP
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up46.0%
Progression40.1%
Chance creation12.8%
Attacking transition1.2%
Vision AI Model Insight
Build-up is where Lorient spends most of its time on the ball (46% of its time on the ball).

Paris FC

The question
When Paris FC has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Paris FC's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 9.1% of the time on the ball9%Progression: 58.3% of the time on the ball58%Chance creation: 27.9% of the time on the ball28%Attacking transition: 4.6% of the time on the ball5%58%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up9.1%
Progression58.3%
Chance creation27.9%
Attacking transition4.6%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Paris FC spends most of its time on the ball (58% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Lorient
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Paris FC
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Lorient — 637 touches
Paris FC — 868 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Lorient

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Lorient actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
489
ACTIONS
6%7%16%8%8%7%9%10%10%7%2%3%2%4%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
85
ACTIONS
5%11%20%1%6%5%11%9%9%5%2%1%2%5%8%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (16.7% of all actions). 67% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 33% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 45% defensive, 42% middle, 13% attacking.

Paris FC

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Paris FC actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
744
ACTIONS
2%4%4%2%7%15%19%13%7%8%6%4%3%4%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
147
ACTIONS
1%5%2%3%11%12%25%12%6%10%3%3%7%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (20.0% of all actions). 70% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 30% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 13% defensive, 61% middle, 26% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Lorient leaned on their left (40%); Paris FC leaned on their right (39%).

Lorient
40%Left side29%Middle31%Right sideATTACKING →
L
40%29%31%
R
Paris FC
26%Left side35%Middle39%Right sideATTACKING →
L
26%35%39%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Lorient — 26 entries, 42% through the left wing
Left wing: 11 entries (42%)1142%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 3 entries (12%)312%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 4 entries (15%)415%CENTRERight half-space: 3 entries (12%)312%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 5 entries (19%)519%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Paris FC — 79 entries, 32% through the right wing
Left wing: 18 entries (23%)1823%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 12 entries (15%)1215%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 13 entries (16%)1316%CENTRERight half-space: 11 entries (14%)1114%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 25 entries (32%)2532%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Lorient

The football question
How does Lorient progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

220build-up passes attempted
80%completed
23%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third

Pass types

72CB · 41%
8Long Wide · 5%
75Wide → FB · 42%
22Central · 12%
CB72 · 41%
right: 40 passes, most from Talbi40left: 32 passes, most from Touré32
Long Wide8 · 5%
left: 5 passes, most from Mvogo5right: 3 passes, most from Mvogo3
Wide → FB75 · 42%
left: 45 passes, most from Mvogo45right: 30 passes, most from Mvogo30
Central22 · 12%
left: 11 passes, most from Mvogo11right: 11 passes, most from Georgen11
◆ Vision AI Insight
Lorient build predominantly down the left, with Mvogo as the fulcrum (40 build-up passes). Only 25% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → C def (14×).

Paris FC

The football question
How does Paris FC progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

97build-up passes attempted
91%completed
33%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

48CB · 55%
5Long Wide · 6%
1Long Central · 1%
21Wide → FB · 24%
13Central · 15%
CB48 · 55%
left: 27 passes, most from Coppola27right: 21 passes, most from Coppola21
Long Wide5 · 6%
right: 4 passes, most from Koleosho4
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB21 · 24%
left: 16 passes, most from Trapp16right: 5 passes, most from Trapp5
Central13 · 15%
left: 7 passes, most from Trapp7right: 6 passes, most from Lopez6
◆ Vision AI Insight
Paris FC build predominantly down the right, with Coppola as the fulcrum (22 build-up passes). Only 34% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → C def (7×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Lorient

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 31 progressive passes across 1 match (31.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
29%
Right half-space
10%
Central
19%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
32%
Progression is left-dominant: 39% right side · 19% central · 42% left.

Who generates it

Arsène Kouassi
7 · 23%
Dembo Sylla
5 · 16%
Isaak Touré
5 · 16%
Jean-Victor Makengo
4 · 13%
Yvon Mvogo
3 · 10%
Top two — Arsène Kouassi & Dembo Sylla — account for 39% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
31.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
23% reach final third
23% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 77% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 23% of progressive passes reached the final third and 23% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 39% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced

Paris FC

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 63 progressive passes across 1 match (63.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
37%
Right half-space
14%
Central
16%
Left half-space
19%
Left wing
14%
Progression is right-dominant: 51% right side · 16% central · 33% left.

Who generates it

Ilan Kebbal
12 · 19%
Hamari Traoré
10 · 16%
Luca Koleosho
7 · 11%
Pierre Lees-Melou
7 · 11%
Maxime Lopez
6 · 10%
Top two — Ilan Kebbal & Hamari Traoré — account for 35% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
63.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
35% reach final third
11% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 65% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 35% of progressive passes reached the final third and 11% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 35% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralsterile
Left half-spaceefficient
Left wingsterile
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Lorient

The question
Where do Lorient's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

8shots
0.6xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 1 shots (12%)12%1Settled attack: 5 shots (62%)62%5Set piece: 2 shots (25%)25%28SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 12% of shots100.040.04
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.040.04
Settled attack 62% of shots510.440.09
Cross210.230.12
Pass into the box / short pass200.170.08
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.040.04
Set piece 25% of shots200.090.05
Corner100.060.06
Free kick100.030.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Jean-Victor Makengo10.161
Dembo Sylla20.140
Mamadou Koné10.110

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Jean-Victor Makengo20.190
Gabin Bernardeau10.161
Mamadou Koné20.100
Montassar Talbi10.060
Isaak Touré10.040
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Lorient's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.4 of 0.6 xG, 5 of 8 shots), mostly cross. 1 of the 8 shots (12%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 8 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 0.6 xG (+0.4).

Paris FC

The question
Where do Paris FC's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

17shots
1.1xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (18%)18%3Settled attack: 7 shots (41%)41%7Set piece: 7 shots (41%)41%717SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 18% of shots300.320.11
Pass into the box / short pass200.110.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.210.21
Settled attack 41% of shots700.470.07
Cross300.280.09
Pass into the box / short pass300.130.04
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.060.06
Set piece 41% of shots700.320.05
Corner500.270.05
Free kick200.050.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Hamari Traoré20.170
Luca Koleosho10.110
Pierre Lees-Melou20.110
Lassine Sinayoko20.080
Maxime Lopez10.050

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Lassine Sinayoko30.400
Pablo Pagis40.190
Adama Camara20.160
Ilan Kebbal30.110
Luca Koleosho20.080
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Paris FC's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.5 of 1.1 xG, 7 of 17 shots), mostly cross. 3 of the 17 shots (18%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 7 of the 17 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 1.1 xG (-1.1).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Lorient

The question
How does Lorient deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

6 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (67%), 2 led to a shot (33%). 3 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (33%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Paris FC

The question
How does Paris FC deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

21 crosses: 6 found a team-mate (29%), 3 led to a shot (14%). 1 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (0%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Lorient

The question
Which part of the final third does Lorient actually cross from?

6 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 2 crosses (33%)33%2advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 1 crosses (17%)17%1byline right wing: 1 crosses (17%)17%1byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 2 crosses (33%)33%2
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing233%0
byline · left wing233%1
advanced · left wing117%0
byline · right wing117%1

Paris FC

The question
Which part of the final third does Paris FC actually cross from?

21 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (5%)5%1deep right half-space: 1 crosses (5%)5%1deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 7 crosses (33%)33%7advanced right half-space: 2 crosses (10%)10%2advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 5 crosses (24%)24%5byline right wing: 3 crosses (14%)14%3byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 2 crosses (10%)10%2
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing733%0
advanced · left wing524%0
byline · right wing314%1
advanced · right half-space210%0
byline · left wing210%1
deep · right wing15%1
deep · right half-space15%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+1.02Lorient on-ball value
+1.08Paris FC on-ball value
+0.0+0.6+1.1HALF TIME+1.02+1.080′15′30′45′60′75′90′
LorientParis FCEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Lorient — where the value came from
Passes489 actions+0.00
Carries85 actions+0.18
Dribbles18 actions+0.16
Shots8 actions+0.43
Ball wins62 actions+0.26
Paris FC — where the value came from
Passes744 actions+0.35
Carries147 actions+0.13
Dribbles9 actions-0.10
Shots17 actions+0.42
Ball wins64 actions+0.28
Lorient — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Jean-Victor Makengo65+0.267
Yvon Mvogo64+0.236
Gabin Bernardeau7+0.210
Isaak Touré78+0.181
Nathaniel Adjei55+0.117
Isak Jensen (lowest)42-0.116
Paris FC — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Lassine Sinayoko32+0.249
Pablo Pagis73+0.173
Luca Koleosho76+0.146
Hamari Traoré95+0.139
Pierre Lees-Melou114+0.128
Adama Camara (lowest)49-0.063
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Lorient

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

8 of 28 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%8/28Talbi1 of 36 pass attempts lost here (3%).3%1/36Talbi14 of 79 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%14/79Mvogo7 of 40 pass attempts lost here (18%).18%7/40Touré13 of 37 pass attempts lost here (35%).35%13/37Kouassi4 of 32 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%4/32Makengo3 of 43 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%3/43Makengo7 of 50 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%7/50Cadiou3 of 47 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%3/47Jensen5 of 36 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%5/36Kouassi10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.4 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 of 22 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%3/22Jensenattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
13
Failed forward pass
7
Failed take-on
8
Lost in the defensive third
43
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 35% of 37 pass attempts there are lost (13 times). Separately, 17% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Paris FC

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

5 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.1 of 18 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%1/18Chergui3 of 32 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%3/32Coppola2 of 27 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%2/27Lees-Melou2 of 15 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%2/15Coppola5 of 50 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%5/50Kebbal8 of 109 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%8/109Camara6 of 141 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%6/141Sinayoko4 of 98 pass attempts lost here (4%).4%4/98Lees-Melou3 of 50 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%3/50Coppola18 of 62 pass attempts lost here (29%).29%18/62Kebbal13 of 47 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%13/47Lopez7 of 31 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%7/31Sinayoko8 of 26 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%8/26Sinayoko13 of 33 pass attempts lost here (39%).39%13/33Koleoshoattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
59
Failed forward pass
40
Failed take-on
6
Lost in the defensive third
9
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the attacking third: 39% of 33 pass attempts there are lost (13 times). Separately, 63% of all losses happen in the attacking third — cheap, low-risk turnovers.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Lorient

Not just press intensity, but where the 165 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
8%
Middle third
22%
Own third
69%
By intensity this is an passive / low block: 13.5 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 8% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 22% in midfield.

Where they win it back

8175024151110DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

Paris FC

Not just press intensity, but where the 157 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
27%
Middle third
41%
Own third
32%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.2 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 27% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 41% in midfield.

Where they win it back

94181271716128129101283DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Lorient

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Lorient win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 35 opposition possessions that Lorient ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
7.2passes
median 6 · before Lorient win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
18sec
median 12s · 35.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
26%
23%
26%
26%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
12.5
28s
15–30′
5.8
14s
30–45+′
7.8
19s
45–60′
5.4
13s
60–75′
4.6
10s
75–90+′
6.4
22s
average passesaverage seconds

Paris FC

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Paris FC win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 41 opposition possessions that Paris FC ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.2passes
median 2 · before Paris FC win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
11sec
median 3s · 41.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
59%
15%
15%
12%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
6.4
17s
15–30′
5.5
12s
30–45+′
5.2
17s
45–60′
5.6
21s
60–75′
2.2
3s
75–90+′
1.4
1s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Lorient — 165 actions, 135 won
Paris FC — 157 actions, 109 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Lorient — 98 wins · 4% in the final third, 11% midfield, 85% own third
own third, right: 16 of 98 wins (16%)16%16 winsown third, centre: 43 of 98 wins (44%)44%43 winsown third, left: 24 of 98 wins (24%)24%24 winsmidfield, right: 4 of 98 wins (4%)4%4 winsmidfield, centre: 2 of 98 wins (2%)2%2 winsmidfield, left: 5 of 98 wins (5%)5%5 winsfinal third, right: 2 of 98 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, centre: 0 of 98 wins (0%)final third, left: 2 of 98 wins (2%)2%2 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Arsène Kouassiball-recovery12′75
Noah Cadiouball-recovery75′69
Alec Georgeninterception59′69
Mamadou Konéball-recovery63′68
Jean-Victor Makengoball-recovery1′54
Paris FC — 81 wins · 14% in the final third, 47% midfield, 40% own third
own third, right: 6 of 81 wins (7%)7%6 winsown third, centre: 17 of 81 wins (21%)21%17 winsown third, left: 9 of 81 wins (11%)11%9 winsmidfield, right: 15 of 81 wins (19%)19%15 winsmidfield, centre: 12 of 81 wins (15%)15%12 winsmidfield, left: 11 of 81 wins (14%)14%11 winsfinal third, right: 5 of 81 wins (6%)6%5 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 81 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 5 of 81 wins (6%)6%5 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Lassine Sinayokoball-recovery62′86
Pablo Pagistackle10′80
Maxime Lopezball-recovery10′74
Samir Cherguiinterception11′73
Luca Koleoshoball-recovery56′72
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Lorient

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Lorient? 63 opponent progressive passes and 17 shots faced (1.1 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Lorient)

Right wing
38%
Right half-space
14%
Central
16%
Left half-space
24%
Left wing
8%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (38% of the danger conceded).

Paris FC

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Paris FC? 31 opponent progressive passes and 8 shots faced (0.6 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Paris FC)

Right wing
25%
Right half-space
8%
Central
31%
Left half-space
11%
Left wing
25%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the central (31% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Lorient

Build-up (own third)

safer, more recycling

right 27% · centre 45% · left 28%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
260
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+9.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
14%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
17%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.2 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
47% of 72
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
58%
Progression (middle third)

more recycling, safer, circulating

right 33% · centre 35% · left 33%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
249
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
14%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
29% of 51
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
53%
Final third

safer, left-sided, circulating

right 23% · centre 23% · left 54%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
83
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.4 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
33% of 18
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
39%

Paris FC

Build-up (own third)

safer, left-sided, shorter passing

right 17% · centre 45% · left 37%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
115
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+7.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
81% of 37
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
22%
Progression (middle third)

quicker, safer, played inside

right 29% · centre 43% · left 27%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
546
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
4%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.1 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
62% of 74
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
32%
Final third

safer, right-sided, narrow, central

right 51% · centre 20% · left 29%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
239
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
14%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
19% of 64
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
66%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Lorient
compared with their other 7 matches this season
PPDA13.5vs 7.5
Threat from passing2.57vs 5.40
Field tilt24%vs 43%
Progressive passes31vs 44
Final-third entries26vs 40
Paris FC
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Progressive passes63vs 35
Final-third entries79vs 36
Field tilt76%vs 42%
Passes744vs 574
Progressive carries50vs 33

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Lorient

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
11%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
46%
Safe / backward
42%
12% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 88% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Paris FC

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
10%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
53%
Safe / backward
35%
12% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 88% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Lorient: 3 corners, 1 led to a shot; Paris FC: 9 corners, 3 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Lorient

3Corners
1Led to a shot
1Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.09Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
33%1 corner33%1 corner33%1 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Paris FC

9Corners
3Led to a shot
5Free kicks, their half
7Set-piece shots
0.32Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
11%1 corner33%22%33%4 from the left flag5 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Lorient
Paris FC

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report