Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Monaco above the line, Toulouse below.
xG race
Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places. Switch to xGOT (xG on target) to count only the shots that tested the goalkeeper, valued by where they went in the goal mouth, or Both to see the two together.
Show
MonacoToulousesolid = xG24 shots — click any dot
Shot map
Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.
Monaco
Toulouse
Goal sequences
The move behind each goal, from the moment Monaco or Toulouse got the ball to the finish. Pick a goal, then step through it or press Play: numbered circles are passes and touches, dotted lines are carries (the ball travelling with a player), dashed grey is a pass that was lost, the star is the shot.
PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 4 of 4 goals traced.
In possession
In possession
How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.
When Monaco has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?
The share of Monaco's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen. A phase is where the ball is on the pitch (own third, middle third, final third); a transition or a set piece skips the build-up and is counted on its own.
Phase
Share of the time
Build-up
25.5%
Progression
44.1%
Chance creation
27.7%
Attacking transition
2.6%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Monaco spends most of its time on the ball (44% of its time on the ball).
Toulouse
The question
When Toulouse has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?
The share of Toulouse's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen. A phase is where the ball is on the pitch (own third, middle third, final third); a transition or a set piece skips the build-up and is counted on its own.
Phase
Share of the time
Build-up
39.5%
Progression
40.1%
Chance creation
15.6%
Attacking transition
4.8%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Toulouse spends most of its time on the ball (40% of its time on the ball).
Passing Network
Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links. Lines are this match's passes between two players, thicker for more.
Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed). Eight families per team — click any map to open it wide, then filter by channel or third, from one to another (or click a cell of the flow grids), by outcome, half, minute and passer. Channels: right wing, right half-space, centre, left half-space, left wing.
From channel
To channel
From third
To third
Outcome · half
Minutes
Channel to channel · click a cell
Third to third · click a cell
Touch Density
Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.
Monaco — 832 touches
Toulouse — 664 touches
Which Zones Do They Attack Through?
Monaco
The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Monaco actually do its on-ball work?
Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other. Each is binned into the 15 pitch zones (three thirds × five vertical lanes) and shaded by its share of that kind of action; the arrows are the real actions.
Passes
the ball moved by a pass
685
ACTIONS
Carries
the ball moved with a player
146
ACTIONS
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (11.2% of all actions). 63% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 37% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 25% defensive, 48% middle, 27% attacking.
Toulouse
The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Toulouse actually do its on-ball work?
Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other. Each is binned into the 15 pitch zones (three thirds × five vertical lanes) and shaded by its share of that kind of action; the arrows are the real actions.
Passes
the ball moved by a pass
493
ACTIONS
Carries
the ball moved with a player
99
ACTIONS
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (13.7% of all actions). 59% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 41% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 40% defensive, 44% middle, 16% attacking.
Attack sides
Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Monaco spread it evenly (no channel above 39%); Toulouse leaned on their left (39%).
Monaco
L
39%30%31%
R
Toulouse
L
39%23%39%
R
Final-third entries
Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.
Monaco — 85 entries, 33% through the left wing
Toulouse — 30 entries, 43% through the left wing
Build-up1 section
Build-Up — the pass map
Monaco
The football question
How does Monaco progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?
Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central. Each gets its own panel below, so nothing competes for attention. Arrow width = volume, labelled with the exact count; hover for the top passer.
176build-up passes attempted
84%completed
23%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third
Pass types
69CB · 47%
5Long Wide · 3%
1Long Central · 1%
53Wide → FB · 36%
19Central · 13%
CB69 · 47%
Long Wide5 · 3%
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB53 · 36%
Central19 · 13%
◆ Vision AI Insight
Monaco build predominantly down the right, with Dier as the fulcrum (44 build-up passes). Only 24% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (14×).
Toulouse
The football question
How does Toulouse progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?
Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central. Each gets its own panel below, so nothing competes for attention. Arrow width = volume, labelled with the exact count; hover for the top passer.
203build-up passes attempted
88%completed
26%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third
Pass types
73CB · 41%
8Long Wide · 4%
72Wide → FB · 40%
25Central · 14%
CB73 · 41%
Long Wide8 · 4%
Wide → FB72 · 40%
Central25 · 14%
◆ Vision AI Insight
Toulouse build predominantly down the left, with McKenzie as the fulcrum (41 build-up passes). Only 26% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (15×).
Progression1 section
How They Progress — the mechanism
Monaco
Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 68 progressive passes across 1 match (68.0/game).
Origin lane
Right wing
32%
Right half-space
15%
Central
4%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
38%
Progression is left-dominant: 47% right side · 4% central · 49% left.
Who generates it
Flávio Nazinho
14 · 21%
Vanderson
11 · 16%
Stanis Idumbo
7 · 10%
Lamine Camara
7 · 10%
Sadibou Sané
6 · 9%
Top two — Flávio Nazinho & Vanderson — account for 37% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
68.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
41% reach final third
13% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 59% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it.41% of progressive passes reached the final third and 13% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 37% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.
Which lanes actually create the threat
Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.
Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient
Toulouse
Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 40 progressive passes across 1 match (40.0/game).
Origin lane
Right wing
50%
Right half-space
2%
Central
8%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
30%
Progression is right-dominant: 52% right side · 8% central · 40% left.
Who generates it
Christ Tapé
11 · 28%
Seny Koumbassa
7 · 18%
Rafik Messali
5 · 12%
Thomas Jørgensen
3 · 8%
Ismaïl Diallo
3 · 8%
Top two — Christ Tapé & Seny Koumbassa — account for 45% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
40.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
25% reach final third
18% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 75% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it.25% of progressive passes reached the final third and 18% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 45% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.
Which lanes actually create the threat
Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.
Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections
Chance creation — how the shots come
Monaco
The question
Where do Monaco's chances actually come from?
Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece. Then by how it was set up: a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box, or no pass at all (the player created it himself). So a cut-back from an attacking transition is counted apart from a cut-back in a settled attack.
16shots
1.1xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set up
Shots
Goals
xG
xG / shot
Attacking transition25% of shots
4
1
0.21
0.05
Pass into the box / short pass
3
1
0.13
0.04
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)
1
0
0.08
0.08
Settled attack62% of shots
10
1
0.77
0.08
Cross
4
1
0.36
0.09
Pass into the box / short pass
4
0
0.20
0.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)
2
0
0.22
0.11
Set piece12% of shots
2
0
0.16
0.08
Corner
1
0
0.12
0.12
Free kick
1
0
0.03
0.03
Every attempt to create — and what came of it
Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.
Who sets the shots up
Player
Set-ups
xG created
Goals
Vanderson
3
0.20
0
Aleksandr Golovin
1
0.13
1
Flávio Nazinho
2
0.09
0
Eric Dier
1
0.07
0
Ansu Fati
1
0.07
0
Who takes them
Player
Shots
xG
Goals
Mathys Detourbet
2
0.24
0
Edan Diop
2
0.19
1
Matthis Abline
3
0.16
1
Lamine Camara
2
0.15
0
Stanis Idumbo
2
0.14
0
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Monaco's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.8 of 1.1 xG, 10 of 16 shots), mostly cross. 4 of the 16 shots (25%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 16 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 1.1 xG (+0.9).
Toulouse
The question
Where do Toulouse's chances actually come from?
Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece. Then by how it was set up: a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box, or no pass at all (the player created it himself). So a cut-back from an attacking transition is counted apart from a cut-back in a settled attack.
8shots
1.2xG
0.16xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set up
Shots
Goals
xG
xG / shot
Attacking transition62% of shots
5
0
0.23
0.05
Pass into the box / short pass
4
0
0.18
0.04
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)
1
0
0.05
0.05
Settled attack25% of shots
2
1
0.22
0.11
Pass into the box / short pass
2
1
0.22
0.11
Set piece12% of shots
1
1
0.79
0.79
Penalty
1
1
0.79
0.79
Every attempt to create — and what came of it
Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.
Who sets the shots up
Player
Set-ups
xG created
Goals
Casper Tengstedt
1
0.16
1
Cristian Cásseres
1
0.09
0
Aron Dønnum
1
0.07
0
Ilyas Azizi
1
0.06
0
Christ Tapé
2
0.04
0
Who takes them
Player
Shots
xG
Goals
Casper Tengstedt
3
0.85
1
Sion Oppong
1
0.16
1
Thomas Jørgensen
2
0.12
0
Ilyas Azizi
1
0.09
0
Jacen Russell-Rowe
1
0.04
0
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Toulouse's chances, by xG, is set piece (0.8 of 1.2 xG, 1 of 8 shots), mostly penalty. 5 of the 8 shots (62%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 1 of the 8 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 1.2 xG (+0.8).
Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide
Monaco
The question
How does Monaco deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?
16 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (31%), 3 led to a shot (19%). 1 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (100%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back. Grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball.
Toulouse
Nothing to show here for Toulouse in this match.
Crosses by Territory
Monaco
The question
Which part of the final third does Monaco actually cross from?
16 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline. 25% come from one territory, the advanced right wing; 0 come from the half-spaces and 0 from the centre.
Territory
Crosses
Share
Led to a shot
advanced · right wing
4
25%
0
byline · right wing
4
25%
1
byline · left wing
4
25%
2
deep · left wing
2
12%
0
deep · right wing
1
6%
0
advanced · left wing
1
6%
0
Toulouse
The question
Which part of the final third does Toulouse actually cross from?
5 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline. 40% come from one territory, the advanced left wing; 0 come from the half-spaces and 0 from the centre.
Territory
Crosses
Share
Led to a shot
advanced · left wing
2
40%
0
byline · right wing
2
40%
0
byline · left wing
1
20%
0
On-Ball Value — who moved the game
Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds. A forward pass into space is positive, a lost ball in a dangerous spot is negative. The chart adds the values up as the match goes on.
+1.58Monaco on-ball value
+1.98Toulouse on-ball value
MonacoToulouseEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Monaco — where the value came from
Passes685 actions+0.20
Carries146 actions+0.05
Dribbles19 actions+0.11
Shots16 actions+0.79
Ball wins75 actions+0.43
Toulouse — where the value came from
Passes493 actions+0.32
Carries99 actions+0.11
Dribbles16 actions-0.01
Shots8 actions+1.26
Ball wins77 actions+0.30
Monaco — most on-ball value (OBV)
Player
Actions
OBV
Vanderson
84
+0.314
Edan Diop
28
+0.302
Sadibou Sané
109
+0.237
Mathys Detourbet
44
+0.199
Aleksandr Golovin
57
+0.134
Folarin Balogun (lowest)
9
-0.064
Toulouse — most on-ball value (OBV)
Player
Actions
OBV
Casper Tengstedt
26
+0.988
Ilyas Azizi
47
+0.205
Christ Tapé
85
+0.193
Thomas Jørgensen
48
+0.163
Sion Oppong
15
+0.150
Jacen Russell-Rowe (lowest)
16
-0.064
When they lose it1 section
Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die
Monaco
Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier. Grey cells are real zones with too few attempts to trust a rate.
Loss rate by zone
How they lose it
Incomplete pass — attacking third
35
Failed forward pass
26
Failed take-on
9
Lost in the defensive third
29
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 33% of 18 pass attempts there are lost (6 times). Separately, 40% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Toulouse
Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier. Grey cells are real zones with too few attempts to trust a rate.
Loss rate by zone
How they lose it
Incomplete pass — attacking third
21
Failed forward pass
14
Failed take-on
8
Lost in the defensive third
25
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the attacking third: 38% of 16 pass attempts there are lost (6 times). Separately, 29% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession
Out of possession
How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.
Not just press intensity, but where the 145 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.
Where defensive actions happen
Attacking third
19%
Middle third
43%
Own third
37%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 5.3 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 19% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 43% in midfield.
Where they win it back
Darker = more defensive actions.
Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.
Toulouse
Not just press intensity, but where the 172 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.
Where defensive actions happen
Attacking third
16%
Middle third
28%
Own third
56%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 6.2 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 16% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 28% in midfield.
Where they win it back
Darker = more defensive actions.
Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.
How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won
Monaco
The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Monaco win it back with a defensive action?
Counted over the 41 opposition possessions that Monaco ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge. Fewer passes and seconds means the ball is won quickly (a press); more means the opponent is allowed to play before Monaco step in. Monaco win it after 4.8 opponent passes in the first half-hour and after 3.0 after the hour mark (sooner).
PASSES THEY GET
3.9passes
median 2 · before Monaco win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
9sec
median 3s · 41.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
54%
17%
24%
5%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.9
12s
15–30′
4.7
9s
30–45+′
3.8
9s
45–60′
4.5
12s
60–75′
3.6
6s
75–90+′
2.3
4s
average passesaverage seconds
Toulouse
The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Toulouse win it back with a defensive action?
Counted over the 39 opposition possessions that Toulouse ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge. Fewer passes and seconds means the ball is won quickly (a press); more means the opponent is allowed to play before Toulouse step in. Toulouse win it after 7.4 opponent passes in the first half-hour and after 7.3 after the hour mark (about the same).
PASSES THEY GET
6.6passes
median 4 · before Toulouse win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
19sec
median 11s · 39.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
31%
31%
10%
28%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
7.8
24s
15–30′
6.5
18s
30–45+′
5.7
14s
45–60′
4.8
11s
60–75′
5.5
16s
75–90+′
9.4
31s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections
Defensive Action Map
Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap a dot for the detail.
Monaco — 145 actions, 113 won
Toulouse — 172 actions, 138 won
Ball-Win Map
Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.
Monaco — 85 wins · 15% in the final third, 39% midfield, 46% own third
Highest wins
Type
Min
x
Matthis Abline
ball-recovery
6′
76
Flávio Nazinho
interception
18′
73
Aleksandr Golovin
ball-recovery
64′
72
Denis Zakaria
ball-recovery
40′
72
Aleksandr Golovin
ball-recovery
70′
72
Toulouse — 113 wins · 10% in the final third, 21% midfield, 69% own third
Highest wins
Type
Min
x
Christ Tapé
ball-recovery
43′
76
Cristian Cásseres
tackle
48′
76
Christ Tapé
tackle
59′
75
Cristian Cásseres
ball-recovery
59′
75
Christ Tapé
ball-recovery
56′
73
Defending the box1 section
Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them
Monaco
The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Monaco? 40 opponent progressive passes and 8 shots faced (1.2 xG against) in this match.
Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Monaco)
Right wing
43%
Right half-space
3%
Central
11%
Left half-space
12%
Left wing
31%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (43% of the danger conceded).
Toulouse
The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Toulouse? 68 opponent progressive passes and 16 shots faced (1.1 xG against) in this match.
Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Toulouse)
Right wing
35%
Right half-space
20%
Central
7%
Left half-space
9%
Left wing
29%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (35% of the danger conceded).
Context
Shape and tactics
How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.
How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next. The numbers use every pass, carry and take-on and follow each possession in order; the one-line verdict compares the passing with the league. Tap ? for what a number means.
Monaco
Build-up (own third)
safer, narrow, central, played inside
right 26% · centre 48% · left 26% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.215
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+7.3 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.17%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.16%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.3.1 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).48% of 60
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.47%
Progression (middle third)
safer, playing short
right 33% · centre 31% · left 36% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.399
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+3.4 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.18%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.9%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.5 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).50% of 66
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.52%
Final third
safer, circulating, narrow, central
right 29% · centre 25% · left 46% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.236
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.-0.0 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.18%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.7%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.5 s
Possessions ending in a shot?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).32% of 44
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.48%
Toulouse
Build-up (own third)
safer, left-sided, shorter passing
right 21% · centre 41% · left 37% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.241
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+6.2 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.15%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.12%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.6 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).53% of 62
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.60%
Progression (middle third)
safer, touchline to touchline, played in the channels
right 37% · centre 21% · left 42% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.268
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+4.0 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.18%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.7%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.4 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).37% of 63
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.48%
Final third
safer
right 36% · centre 19% · left 44% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.99
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+1.7 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.19%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.8%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.5 s
Possessions ending in a shot?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).16% of 32
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.56%
Against their own norm
The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.
Monaco
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Final-third entries85vs 48
Progressive passes68vs 47
Defensive actions145vs 162
Passes685vs 537
Field tilt68%vs 50%
Toulouse
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Progressive carries34vs 53
Field tilt32%vs 54%
Threat from passing4.89vs 6.70
Final-third entries30vs 45
PPDA6.2vs 5.3
Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal
Monaco
A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.
Excellent (high xT gain)
13%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
46%
Safe / backward
40%
15% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 85% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Toulouse
A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.
Excellent (high xT gain)
12%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
49%
Safe / backward
38%
13% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 87% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads
Players
Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.
Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Monaco: 4 corners, 1 led to a shot; Toulouse: 4 corners, 0 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.
Monaco
4Corners
1Led to a shot
6Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.16Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
Click an arrow to pick out one corner.
Toulouse
4Corners
0Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
0Set-piece shots
0.00Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
Click an arrow to pick out one corner.
goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick
Who stood out — the most valuable players
Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.
Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Monaco
Toulouse
Every player — the full numbers
Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.
Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
