Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportLigue 1 2026-10-11

Troyes v Marseille

0.921.17expected goals
0.501.64xG on target (xGOT)

Marseille won by more than the chances suggest (0.92 – 1.17 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Troyes
Marseille
Possession (share of passes)
36.9%63.1%
Duels
5551
Duels won
50.9%45.1%
Aerial duels
3232
Aerial duels won
2012
Successful dribbles
56
Passes
396678
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Troyes above the line, Marseille below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.631.261.88Adrien Monfray — post, 0.05 xGAdrien Monfray — save, 0.03 xGAdrien Monfray — save, 0.05 xGJérémy Le Douaron — miss, 0.07 xGHimad Abdelli — save, 0.08 xGJérémy Le Douaron — miss, 0.05 xGIgor Paixão — save, 0.04 xGAmine Harit — goal, 0.17 xGAntoine Mille — miss, 0.04 xGDermane Karim — save, 0.04 xGJérémy Le Douaron — save, 0.06 xGRenaud Ripart — save, 0.06 xGRenaud Ripart — save, 0.08 xGChrist Batola — miss, 0.04 xGTimothé Nkada — miss, 0.05 xGTimothé Nkada — save, 0.04 xGRenaud Ripart — post, 0.16 xGChrist Batola — miss, 0.10 xGFaris Moumbagna — save, 0.08 xGHimad Abdelli — goal, 0.79 xG0.921.17Adrien Monfray — save, 0.07 xGOTAdrien Monfray — save, 0.06 xGOTHimad Abdelli — save, 0.18 xGOTIgor Paixão — save, 0.26 xGOTAmine Harit — goal, 0.17 xGOTDermane Karim — save, 0.04 xGOTJérémy Le Douaron — save, 0.04 xGOTRenaud Ripart — save, 0.04 xGOTRenaud Ripart — save, 0.23 xGOTTimothé Nkada — save, 0.02 xGOTFaris Moumbagna — save, 0.05 xGOTHimad Abdelli — goal, 0.97 xGOT0.501.640'15'30'45'60'75'90'
TroyesMarseillesolid = xG20 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Troyes
Marseille

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Troyes or Marseille got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 2 of 2 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Troyes

The question
When Troyes has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Troyes's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 36.3% of the time on the ball36%Progression: 33.8% of the time on the ball34%Chance creation: 28.7% of the time on the ball29%Attacking transition: 1.2% of the time on the ball36%BUILD-UP
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up36.3%
Progression33.8%
Chance creation28.7%
Attacking transition1.2%
Vision AI Model Insight
Build-up is where Troyes spends most of its time on the ball (36% of its time on the ball).

Marseille

The question
When Marseille has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Marseille's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 29.4% of the time on the ball29%Progression: 56.1% of the time on the ball56%Chance creation: 13.7% of the time on the ball14%Attacking transition: 0.9% of the time on the ball56%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up29.4%
Progression56.1%
Chance creation13.7%
Attacking transition0.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Marseille spends most of its time on the ball (56% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Troyes
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Marseille
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Troyes — 533 touches
Marseille — 836 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Troyes

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Troyes actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
396
ACTIONS
10%6%8%5%8%12%7%7%4%9%12%3%2%7%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
122
ACTIONS
7%7%9%11%4%15%11%6%5%8%7%2%7%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the right wing of the middle third (12.7% of all actions). 45% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 55% down the two wings — a wing-oriented build. By third: 37% defensive, 40% middle, 23% attacking.

Marseille

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Marseille actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
678
ACTIONS
3%8%9%6%5%9%15%12%10%7%5%3%1%2%3%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
163
ACTIONS
3%9%7%6%2%11%18%18%8%6%5%2%2%1%2%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the right half-space of the middle third (15.9% of all actions). 68% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 32% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 31% defensive, 55% middle, 14% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Troyes leaned on their right (49%); Marseille leaned on their right (43%).

Troyes
29%Left side22%Middle49%Right sideATTACKING →
L
29%22%49%
R
Marseille
36%Left side21%Middle43%Right sideATTACKING →
L
36%21%43%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Troyes — 35 entries, 49% through the right wing
Left wing: 12 entries (34%)1234%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 3 entries (9%)39%LEFT HALF-SPACE00%CENTRERight half-space: 3 entries (9%)39%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 17 entries (49%)1749%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Marseille — 41 entries, 34% through the right wing
Left wing: 13 entries (32%)1332%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 4 entries (10%)410%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 5 entries (12%)512%CENTRERight half-space: 5 entries (12%)512%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 14 entries (34%)1434%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Troyes

The football question
How does Troyes progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

144build-up passes attempted
81%completed
25%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third

Pass types

50CB · 43%
4Long Wide · 3%
1Long Central · 1%
57Wide → FB · 49%
5Central · 4%
CB50 · 43%
right: 34 passes, most from Monfray34left: 16 passes, most from Diaz16
Long Wide4 · 3%
left: 4 passes, most from Beach4
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB57 · 49%
left: 29 passes, most from Gozzi29right: 28 passes, most from Maronnier28
Central5 · 4%
right: 3 passes, most from Maronnier3left: 2 passes, most from Gozzi2
◆ Vision AI Insight
Troyes build predominantly down the right, with Monfray as the fulcrum (29 build-up passes). Only 26% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RW def → RW mid (12×).

Marseille

The football question
How does Marseille progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

214build-up passes attempted
88%completed
21%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third

Pass types

88CB · 47%
5Long Wide · 3%
84Wide → FB · 45%
11Central · 6%
CB88 · 47%
right: 52 passes, most from Egan-Riley52left: 36 passes, most from Aguerd36
Long Wide5 · 3%
left: 3 passes, most from Lange3right: 2 passes, most from Lange2
Wide → FB84 · 45%
left: 42 passes, most from Emerson42right: 42 passes, most from Lange42
Central11 · 6%
right: 7 passes, most from Bezahaf7left: 4 passes, most from Lange4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Marseille build predominantly down the right, with Lange as the fulcrum (47 build-up passes). Only 22% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (21×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Troyes

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 39 progressive passes across 1 match (39.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
54%
Right half-space
3%
Central
8%
Left half-space
3%
Left wing
33%
Progression is right-dominant: 56% right side · 8% central · 36% left.

Who generates it

Lucas Maronnier
12 · 31%
Adrien Monfray
7 · 18%
Antoine Mille
4 · 10%
Kandet Diawara
3 · 8%
Patrick Beach
3 · 8%
Top two — Lucas Maronnier & Adrien Monfray — account for 49% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
39.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
28% reach final third
26% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 72% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 28% of progressive passes reached the final third and 26% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 49% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralsterile
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient

Marseille

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 33 progressive passes across 1 match (33.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
45%
Right half-space
6%
Central
15%
Left half-space
6%
Left wing
27%
Progression is right-dominant: 52% right side · 15% central · 33% left.

Who generates it

Angel Gomes
5 · 15%
Kelyann Bezahaf
5 · 15%
Keyliane Abdallah
4 · 12%
Emerson
4 · 12%
Jeffrey de Lange
3 · 9%
Top two — Angel Gomes & Kelyann Bezahaf — account for 30% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
33.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
24% reach final third
15% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 76% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 24% of progressive passes reached the final third and 15% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 30% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Troyes

The question
Where do Troyes's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

15shots
0.9xG
0.06xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (20%)20%3Settled attack: 7 shots (47%)47%7Set piece: 5 shots (33%)33%515SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 20% of shots300.170.06
Cut-back100.050.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.120.06
Settled attack 47% of shots700.520.07
Cross700.520.07
Set piece 33% of shots500.230.05
Corner500.230.05

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Lucas Maronnier30.270
Paolo Gozzi10.100
Antoine Mille10.060
Iron Gomis10.050
Renaud Ripart10.050

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Renaud Ripart30.300
Jérémy Le Douaron30.180
Christ Batola20.140
Adrien Monfray30.130
Timothé Nkada20.080
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Troyes's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.5 of 0.9 xG, 7 of 15 shots), mostly cross. 3 of the 15 shots (20%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 5 of the 15 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 0.9 xG (-0.9).

Marseille

The question
Where do Marseille's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

5shots
1.2xG
0.23xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
2goals
Settled attack: 3 shots (60%)60%3Set piece: 2 shots (40%)40%25SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Settled attack 60% of shots310.290.10
Cross110.170.17
Cut-back100.080.08
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.040.04
Set piece 40% of shots210.880.44
Corner100.080.08
Penalty110.790.79

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Emerson20.251

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Himad Abdelli20.881
Amine Harit10.171
Faris Moumbagna10.080
Igor Paixão10.040
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Marseille's chances, by xG, is set piece (0.9 of 1.2 xG, 2 of 5 shots), mostly penalty. 0 of the 5 shots (0%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 5 shots came from set pieces; 2 goals from 1.2 xG (+0.8).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Troyes

The question
How does Troyes deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

22 crosses: 9 found a team-mate (41%), 8 led to a shot (36%). 3 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (33%), 1 led to a shot (33%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Marseille

The question
How does Marseille deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

12 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (42%), 1 led to a shot (8%). 6 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (33%), 2 led to a shot (33%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Troyes

The question
Which part of the final third does Troyes actually cross from?

22 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 2 crosses (9%)9%2advanced right wing: 7 crosses (32%)32%7advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 1 crosses (5%)5%1byline right wing: 5 crosses (23%)23%5byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 7 crosses (32%)32%7
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing732%3
byline · left wing732%3
byline · right wing523%2
deep · left wing29%0
advanced · left wing15%0

Marseille

The question
Which part of the final third does Marseille actually cross from?

12 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 6 crosses (50%)50%6advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 0 crosses (0%)byline right wing: 3 crosses (25%)25%3byline right half-space: 1 crosses (8%)8%1byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 2 crosses (17%)17%2
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing650%0
byline · right wing325%0
byline · left wing217%1
byline · right half-space18%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+0.98Troyes on-ball value
+1.35Marseille on-ball value
+0.0+0.7+1.3HALF TIME+0.98+1.350′15′30′45′60′75′90′
TroyesMarseilleEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Troyes — where the value came from
Passes396 actions+0.30
Carries122 actions+0.06
Dribbles14 actions+0.07
Shots15 actions+0.27
Ball wins66 actions+0.29
Marseille — where the value came from
Passes678 actions+0.19
Carries163 actions-0.03
Dribbles15 actions-0.20
Shots5 actions+1.09
Ball wins63 actions+0.30
Troyes — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Renaud Ripart15+0.322
Lucas Maronnier69+0.275
Adrien Monfray94+0.136
Paolo Gozzi50+0.115
Patrick Beach33+0.091
Dermane Karim (lowest)56-0.065
Marseille — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Himad Abdelli88+0.896
Igor Paixão40+0.183
Amine Harit53+0.142
Jeffrey de Lange56+0.089
Nouhoum Kamissoko85+0.086
Amine Gouiri (lowest)10-0.181
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Troyes

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

4 of 38 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%4/38Maronnier3 of 24 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%3/24Beach10 of 32 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%10/32Beach2 of 19 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%2/19Phliponeau8 of 31 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%8/31Karim11 of 48 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%11/48Maronnier1 of 29 pass attempts lost here (3%).3%1/29Monfray6 of 27 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%6/27Diaz3 of 15 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%3/15Diawara6 of 35 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%6/35Gozzi15 of 49 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%15/49Mille12 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.2 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.10 of 26 pass attempts lost here (38%).38%10/26Gozziattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
35
Failed forward pass
22
Failed take-on
9
Lost in the defensive third
27
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the attacking third: 38% of 26 pass attempts there are lost (10 times). Separately, 39% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Marseille

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

2 of 22 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%2/22Abdelli7 of 55 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%7/55Abdelli4 of 60 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%4/60Lange2 of 43 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%2/43Aguerd11 of 34 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%11/34Emerson3 of 59 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%3/59Bezahaf8 of 105 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%8/105Egan-Riley9 of 81 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%9/81Kamissoko4 of 71 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%4/71Gomes6 of 50 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%6/50Gomes9 of 36 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%9/36Harit7 of 21 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%7/21Bezahaf8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 of 22 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%3/22Emersonattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
27
Failed forward pass
15
Failed take-on
9
Lost in the defensive third
26
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the attacking third: 33% of 21 pass attempts there are lost (7 times). Separately, 33% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Troyes

Not just press intensity, but where the 166 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
21%
Middle third
32%
Own third
47%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 6.9 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 21% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 32% in midfield.

Where they win it back

1716201213213991111985DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

Marseille

Not just press intensity, but where the 167 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
18%
Middle third
32%
Own third
50%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.0 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 18% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 32% in midfield.

Where they win it back

820181918118852210765DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Troyes

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Troyes win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 34 opposition possessions that Troyes ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
6.2passes
median 3 · before Troyes win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
17sec
median 4s · 34.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
47%
18%
12%
24%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.7
13s
15–30′
7.0
21s
30–45+′
9.0
31s
45–60′
1.2
1s
60–75′
7.0
17s
75–90+′
5.6
13s
average passesaverage seconds

Marseille

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Marseille win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 41 opposition possessions that Marseille ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.4passes
median 3 · before Marseille win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
13sec
median 6s · 41.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
44%
24%
20%
12%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.4
7s
15–30′
3.0
9s
30–45+′
8.0
25s
45–60′
5.0
16s
60–75′
2.4
6s
75–90+′
5.6
17s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Troyes — 166 actions, 125 won
Marseille — 167 actions, 124 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Troyes — 80 wins · 8% in the final third, 29% midfield, 64% own third
own third, right: 22 of 80 wins (28%)28%22 winsown third, centre: 18 of 80 wins (22%)22%18 winsown third, left: 11 of 80 wins (14%)14%11 winsmidfield, right: 8 of 80 wins (10%)10%8 winsmidfield, centre: 7 of 80 wins (9%)9%7 winsmidfield, left: 8 of 80 wins (10%)10%8 winsfinal third, right: 4 of 80 wins (5%)5%4 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 80 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 1 of 80 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Jérémy Le Douaronball-recovery14′91
Antoine Milleball-recovery52′76
Renaud Ripartball-recovery76′76
Mouhamed Diopball-recovery3′75
Dermane Kariminterception74′72
Marseille — 95 wins · 11% in the final third, 29% midfield, 60% own third
own third, right: 20 of 95 wins (21%)21%20 winsown third, centre: 14 of 95 wins (15%)15%14 winsown third, left: 23 of 95 wins (24%)24%23 winsmidfield, right: 11 of 95 wins (12%)12%11 winsmidfield, centre: 3 of 95 wins (3%)3%3 winsmidfield, left: 14 of 95 wins (15%)15%14 winsfinal third, right: 7 of 95 wins (7%)7%7 winsfinal third, centre: 0 of 95 wins (0%)final third, left: 3 of 95 wins (3%)3%3 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Igor Paixãoball-recovery29′84
Himad Abdellitackle96′80
Emersonball-recovery10′78
Igor Paixãoball-recovery24′75
Nouhoum Kamissokotackle58′75
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Troyes

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Troyes? 33 opponent progressive passes and 5 shots faced (1.2 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Troyes)

Right wing
55%
Right half-space
4%
Central
17%
Left half-space
5%
Left wing
19%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (55% of the danger conceded).

Marseille

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Marseille? 39 opponent progressive passes and 15 shots faced (0.9 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Marseille)

Right wing
56%
Right half-space
4%
Central
7%
Left half-space
4%
Left wing
29%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (56% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Troyes

Build-up (own third)

played in the channels, touchline to touchline, safer

right 39% · centre 27% · left 34%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
195
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+8.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
25%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
19%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.0 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
57% of 61
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
49%
Progression (middle third)

safer, played in the channels, slower

right 50% · centre 22% · left 29%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
216
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
26%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
47% of 58
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
41%
Final third

safer, played in the channels, touchline to touchline

right 55% · centre 7% · left 37%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
121
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
35% of 37
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
54%

Marseille

Build-up (own third)

safer, playing short, kept on the floor

right 32% · centre 38% · left 31%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
260
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
10%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
52% of 60
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
47%
Progression (middle third)

safer, kept on the floor, played inside

right 39% · centre 34% · left 27%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
470
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
5%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
44% of 54
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
59%
Final third

safer, right-sided

right 54% · centre 14% · left 32%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
126
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
14%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.9 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
11% of 36
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
61%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Troyes
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Final-third entries35vs 45
Defensive actions166vs 154
Progressive carries50vs 38
Progressive passes39vs 44
PPDA6.9vs 6.4
Marseille
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Progressive passes33vs 44
Progressive carries42vs 56
Defensive actions167vs 143
Final-third entries41vs 53
PPDA4.0vs 4.9

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Troyes

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
12%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
53%
Safe / backward
34%
13% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 87% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Marseille

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
9%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
50%
Safe / backward
40%
10% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 90% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Troyes: 6 corners, 3 led to a shot; Marseille: 3 corners, 1 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Troyes

6Corners
3Led to a shot
3Free kicks, their half
5Set-piece shots
0.23Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
17%1 corner33%2 corners33%17%4 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Marseille

3Corners
1Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.08Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
33%1 corner33%1 corner33%0 from the left flag3 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Troyes
Marseille

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report