Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Lille above the line, Brest below.
xG race
Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places. Switch to xGOT (xG on target) to count only the shots that tested the goalkeeper, valued by where they went in the goal mouth, or Both to see the two together.
Show
LilleBrestsolid = xG25 shots — click any dot
Shot map
Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.
Lille
Brest
Goal sequences
The move behind each goal, from the moment Lille or Brest got the ball to the finish. Pick a goal, then step through it or press Play: numbered circles are passes and touches, dotted lines are carries (the ball travelling with a player), dashed grey is a pass that was lost, the star is the shot.
PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 2 of 2 goals traced.
In possession
In possession
How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.
When Lille has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?
The share of Lille's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen. A phase is where the ball is on the pitch (own third, middle third, final third); a transition or a set piece skips the build-up and is counted on its own.
Phase
Share of the time
Build-up
25.8%
Progression
50.3%
Chance creation
23.8%
Attacking transition
0.2%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Lille spends most of its time on the ball (50% of its time on the ball).
Brest
The question
When Brest has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?
The share of Brest's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen. A phase is where the ball is on the pitch (own third, middle third, final third); a transition or a set piece skips the build-up and is counted on its own.
Phase
Share of the time
Build-up
49.2%
Progression
39.0%
Chance creation
9.9%
Attacking transition
1.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Build-up is where Brest spends most of its time on the ball (49% of its time on the ball).
Passing Network
Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links. Lines are this match's passes between two players, thicker for more.
Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed). Eight families per team — click any map to open it wide, then filter by channel or third, from one to another (or click a cell of the flow grids), by outcome, half, minute and passer. Channels: right wing, right half-space, centre, left half-space, left wing.
From channel
To channel
From third
To third
Outcome · half
Minutes
Channel to channel · click a cell
Third to third · click a cell
Touch Density
Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.
Lille — 866 touches
Brest — 514 touches
Which Zones Do They Attack Through?
Lille
The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Lille actually do its on-ball work?
Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other. Each is binned into the 15 pitch zones (three thirds × five vertical lanes) and shaded by its share of that kind of action; the arrows are the real actions.
Passes
the ball moved by a pass
701
ACTIONS
Carries
the ball moved with a player
224
ACTIONS
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (12.1% of all actions). 56% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 44% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 22% defensive, 52% middle, 25% attacking.
Brest
The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Brest actually do its on-ball work?
Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other. Each is binned into the 15 pitch zones (three thirds × five vertical lanes) and shaded by its share of that kind of action; the arrows are the real actions.
Passes
the ball moved by a pass
345
ACTIONS
Carries
the ball moved with a player
65
ACTIONS
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (16.8% of all actions). 64% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 36% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 49% defensive, 41% middle, 10% attacking.
Attack sides
Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Lille leaned on their left (42%); Brest leaned on their left (41%).
Lille
L
42%20%38%
R
Brest
L
41%27%32%
R
Final-third entries
Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.
Lille — 66 entries, 39% through the right wing
Brest — 21 entries, 29% through the right half-space
Build-up1 section
Build-Up — the pass map
Lille
The football question
How does Lille progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?
Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central. Each gets its own panel below, so nothing competes for attention. Arrow width = volume, labelled with the exact count; hover for the top passer.
150build-up passes attempted
95%completed
22%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third
Pass types
72CB · 51%
7Long Wide · 5%
46Wide → FB · 32%
17Central · 12%
CB72 · 51%
Long Wide7 · 5%
Wide → FB46 · 32%
Central17 · 12%
◆ Vision AI Insight
Lille build predominantly down the left, with Ngoy as the fulcrum (38 build-up passes). Only 25% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (13×).
Brest
The football question
How does Brest progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?
Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central. Each gets its own panel below, so nothing competes for attention. Arrow width = volume, labelled with the exact count; hover for the top passer.
176build-up passes attempted
77%completed
25%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third
Pass types
81CB · 60%
4Long Wide · 3%
5Long Central · 4%
39Wide → FB · 29%
7Central · 5%
CB81 · 60%
Long Wide4 · 3%
Long Central5 · 4%
Wide → FB39 · 29%
Central7 · 5%
◆ Vision AI Insight
Brest build predominantly down the left, with Selvik as the fulcrum (26 build-up passes). Only 26% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (11×).
Progression1 section
How They Progress — the mechanism
Lille
Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 65 progressive passes across 1 match (65.0/game).
Origin lane
Right wing
40%
Right half-space
8%
Central
9%
Left half-space
11%
Left wing
32%
Progression is right-dominant: 48% right side · 9% central · 43% left.
Who generates it
Ethan Mbappé
17 · 26%
Dilane Bakwa
14 · 22%
Romain Perraud
7 · 11%
Calvin Verdonk
6 · 9%
Nathan Ngoy
4 · 6%
Top two — Ethan Mbappé & Dilane Bakwa — account for 48% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
65.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
23% reach final third
23% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 77% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it.23% of progressive passes reached the final third and 23% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 48% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.
Which lanes actually create the threat
Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.
Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spaceefficient
Centralsterile
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingbalanced
Brest
Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 29 progressive passes across 1 match (29.0/game).
Origin lane
Right wing
31%
Right half-space
17%
Central
24%
Left half-space
7%
Left wing
21%
Progression is right-dominant: 48% right side · 24% central · 28% left.
Who generates it
Joris Chotard
8 · 28%
Egil Selvik
6 · 21%
Lucas Tousart
4 · 14%
Kenny Lala
4 · 14%
Hugo Magnetti
2 · 7%
Top two — Joris Chotard & Egil Selvik — account for 48% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
29.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
34% reach final third
17% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 66% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it.34% of progressive passes reached the final third and 17% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 48% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.
Which lanes actually create the threat
Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.
Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spaceefficient
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingsterile
Chance creation4 sections
Chance creation — how the shots come
Lille
The question
Where do Lille's chances actually come from?
Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece. Then by how it was set up: a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box, or no pass at all (the player created it himself). So a cut-back from an attacking transition is counted apart from a cut-back in a settled attack.
17shots
1.9xG
0.11xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set up
Shots
Goals
xG
xG / shot
Settled attack71% of shots
12
0
0.87
0.07
Cross
2
0
0.12
0.06
Cut-back
2
0
0.18
0.09
Pass into the box / short pass
6
0
0.48
0.08
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)
2
0
0.09
0.04
Set piece29% of shots
5
1
1.01
0.20
Corner
3
0
0.18
0.06
Free kick
1
0
0.03
0.03
Penalty
1
1
0.79
0.79
Every attempt to create — and what came of it
Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.
Who sets the shots up
Player
Set-ups
xG created
Goals
Nathan Ngoy
1
0.24
0
Maxima Goffi
3
0.17
0
Ethan Mbappé
1
0.11
0
Hákon Haraldsson
2
0.09
0
Romain Perraud
1
0.07
0
Who takes them
Player
Shots
xG
Goals
Olivier Giroud
2
0.90
1
Tanguy Nianzou
2
0.35
0
Maxima Goffi
3
0.14
0
Nabil Bentaleb
3
0.11
0
Benjamin André
2
0.10
0
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Lille's chances, by xG, is set piece (1.0 of 1.9 xG, 5 of 17 shots), mostly penalty. 0 of the 17 shots (0%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 5 of the 17 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 1.9 xG (-0.9).
Brest
The question
Where do Brest's chances actually come from?
Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece. Then by how it was set up: a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box, or no pass at all (the player created it himself). So a cut-back from an attacking transition is counted apart from a cut-back in a settled attack.
8shots
0.7xG
0.09xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set up
Shots
Goals
xG
xG / shot
Attacking transition12% of shots
1
0
0.09
0.09
Pass into the box / short pass
1
0
0.09
0.09
Settled attack50% of shots
4
0
0.21
0.05
Long ball
2
0
0.14
0.07
Pass into the box / short pass
1
0
0.03
0.03
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)
1
0
0.04
0.04
Set piece38% of shots
3
1
0.39
0.13
Corner
3
1
0.39
0.13
Every attempt to create — and what came of it
Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.
Who sets the shots up
Player
Set-ups
xG created
Goals
Lucas Tousart
1
0.10
0
Joseph Nonge
1
0.09
0
Joris Chotard
1
0.04
0
Hugo Magnetti
1
0.03
0
Who takes them
Player
Shots
xG
Goals
Gautier Lloris
3
0.23
0
Mama Baldé
1
0.20
1
Ibrahim Kanté
2
0.20
0
Joseph Nonge
1
0.04
0
Bradley Locko
1
0.03
0
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Brest's chances, by xG, is set piece (0.4 of 0.7 xG, 3 of 8 shots), mostly corner. 1 of the 8 shots (12%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 8 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 0.7 xG (+0.3).
Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide
Lille
The question
How does Lille deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?
21 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (24%), 1 led to a shot (5%). 7 cut-backs: 4 found a team-mate (57%), 2 led to a shot (29%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back. Grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball.
Brest
Nothing to show here for Brest in this match.
Crosses by Territory
Lille
The question
Which part of the final third does Lille actually cross from?
21 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline. 29% come from one territory, the advanced left wing; 1 come from the half-spaces and 0 from the centre.
Territory
Crosses
Share
Led to a shot
advanced · left wing
6
29%
0
byline · right wing
6
29%
0
byline · left wing
6
29%
0
advanced · right wing
2
10%
1
byline · left half-space
1
5%
0
Brest
The question
Which part of the final third does Brest actually cross from?
2 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline. 50% come from one territory, the deep right half-space; 1 come from the half-spaces and 0 from the centre.
Territory
Crosses
Share
Led to a shot
deep · right half-space
1
50%
0
advanced · left wing
1
50%
0
On-Ball Value — who moved the game
Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds. A forward pass into space is positive, a lost ball in a dangerous spot is negative. The chart adds the values up as the match goes on.
+2.12Lille on-ball value
+1.37Brest on-ball value
LilleBrestEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Lille — where the value came from
Passes701 actions+0.62
Carries224 actions-0.07
Dribbles29 actions+0.07
Shots17 actions+1.22
Ball wins64 actions+0.28
Brest — where the value came from
Passes345 actions+0.78
Carries65 actions-0.15
Dribbles16 actions+0.12
Shots8 actions+0.27
Ball wins57 actions+0.34
Lille — most on-ball value (OBV)
Player
Actions
OBV
Olivier Giroud
13
+0.655
Nathan Ngoy
149
+0.347
Tanguy Nianzou
114
+0.303
Dilane Bakwa
83
+0.254
Ethan Mbappé
93
+0.250
Hákon Haraldsson (lowest)
83
-0.069
Brest — most on-ball value (OBV)
Player
Actions
OBV
Mama Baldé
25
+0.356
Pathé Mboup
40
+0.329
Ibrahim Kanté
11
+0.236
Egil Selvik
42
+0.191
Joris Chotard
44
+0.152
Gautier Lloris (lowest)
48
-0.274
When they lose it1 section
Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die
Lille
Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier. Grey cells are real zones with too few attempts to trust a rate.
Loss rate by zone
How they lose it
Incomplete pass — attacking third
50
Failed forward pass
34
Failed take-on
16
Lost in the defensive third
8
Their weakest zone is the left half-space in the attacking third: 39% of 33 pass attempts there are lost (13 times). Separately, 60% of all losses happen in the attacking third — cheap, low-risk turnovers.
Brest
Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier. Grey cells are real zones with too few attempts to trust a rate.
Loss rate by zone
How they lose it
Incomplete pass — attacking third
13
Failed forward pass
8
Failed take-on
10
Lost in the defensive third
40
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the middle third: 32% of 22 pass attempts there are lost (7 times). Separately, 17% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession
Out of possession
How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.
Not just press intensity, but where the 146 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.
Where defensive actions happen
Attacking third
25%
Middle third
43%
Own third
32%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.4 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 25% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 43% in midfield.
Where they win it back
Darker = more defensive actions.
Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.
Brest
Not just press intensity, but where the 171 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.
Where defensive actions happen
Attacking third
7%
Middle third
26%
Own third
67%
By intensity this is an moderate press: 10.0 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 7% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 26% in midfield.
Where they win it back
Darker = more defensive actions.
Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.
How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won
Lille
The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Lille win it back with a defensive action?
Counted over the 29 opposition possessions that Lille ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge. Fewer passes and seconds means the ball is won quickly (a press); more means the opponent is allowed to play before Lille step in. Lille win it after 2.2 opponent passes in the first half-hour and after 4.9 after the hour mark (later).
PASSES THEY GET
4.6passes
median 3 · before Lille win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
14sec
median 10s · 29.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
45%
24%
21%
10%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
2.3
12s
15–30′
2.0
4s
30–45+′
3.4
10s
45–60′
8.4
23s
60–75′
5.3
20s
75–90+′
4.4
10s
average passesaverage seconds
Brest
The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Brest win it back with a defensive action?
Counted over the 32 opposition possessions that Brest ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge. Fewer passes and seconds means the ball is won quickly (a press); more means the opponent is allowed to play before Brest step in. Brest win it after 5.5 opponent passes in the first half-hour and after 5.9 after the hour mark (later).
PASSES THEY GET
7.1passes
median 5 · before Brest win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
22sec
median 14s · 32.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
34%
19%
22%
25%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
5.6
14s
15–30′
5.5
17s
30–45+′
12.3
42s
45–60′
7.0
24s
60–75′
7.0
24s
75–90+′
5.3
16s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections
Defensive Action Map
Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap a dot for the detail.
Lille — 146 actions, 109 won
Brest — 171 actions, 122 won
Ball-Win Map
Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.
Lille — 72 wins · 18% in the final third, 35% midfield, 47% own third
Highest wins
Type
Min
x
Ethan Mbappé
ball-recovery
81′
83
Ethan Mbappé
ball-recovery
7′
83
Ethan Mbappé
tackle
52′
79
Ethan Mbappé
tackle
81′
78
Benjamin André
tackle
39′
76
Brest — 96 wins · 2% in the final third, 12% midfield, 85% own third
Highest wins
Type
Min
x
Lucas Tousart
ball-recovery
50′
75
Joseph Nonge
ball-recovery
71′
72
Kenny Lala
ball-recovery
3′
62
Lucas Tousart
ball-recovery
2′
52
Kamory Doumbia
ball-recovery
26′
47
Defending the box1 section
Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them
Lille
The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Lille? 29 opponent progressive passes and 8 shots faced (0.7 xG against) in this match.
Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Lille)
Right wing
24%
Right half-space
21%
Central
29%
Left half-space
12%
Left wing
14%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the central (29% of the danger conceded).
Brest
The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Brest? 65 opponent progressive passes and 17 shots faced (1.9 xG against) in this match.
Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Brest)
Right wing
41%
Right half-space
12%
Central
11%
Left half-space
8%
Left wing
28%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (41% of the danger conceded).
Context
Shape and tactics
How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.
How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next. The numbers use every pass, carry and take-on and follow each possession in order; the one-line verdict compares the passing with the league. Tap ? for what a number means.
Lille
Build-up (own third)
safer, playing short, circulating
right 26% · centre 44% · left 30% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.208
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+5.5 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.28%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.13%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.8 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).83% of 46
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.20%
Progression (middle third)
safer, playing short, kept on the floor
right 31% · centre 30% · left 39% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.488
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+3.2 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.26%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.6%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.4 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).69% of 71
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.32%
Final third
safer, playing short, left-sided
right 42% · centre 9% · left 49% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.258
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+1.1 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.18%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.8%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.3 s
Possessions ending in a shot?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).20% of 66
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.62%
Brest
Build-up (own third)
safer
right 30% · centre 38% · left 32% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.205
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+9.3 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.12%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.19%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.3.2 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).45% of 69
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.55%
Progression (middle third)
safer
right 31% · centre 26% · left 43% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.175
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+3.8 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.21%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.11%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.5 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).32% of 53
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.51%
Final third
safer, shorter passing, quicker
right 28% · centre 22% · left 50% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.46
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.-0.1 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.12%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.6%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.0 s
Possessions ending in a shot?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).24% of 21
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.43%
Against their own norm
The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.
Lille
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Final-third entries66vs 35
Progressive passes65vs 38
Field tilt82%vs 38%
Expected goals1.88vs 0.99
Progressive carries79vs 41
Brest
compared with their other 7 matches this season
PPDA10.0vs 4.6
Field tilt18%vs 48%
Progressive passes29vs 46
Passes345vs 475
Final-third entries21vs 37
Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal
Lille
A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.
Excellent (high xT gain)
12%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
50%
Safe / backward
37%
14% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 86% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Brest
A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.
Excellent (high xT gain)
12%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
51%
Safe / backward
36%
13% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 87% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads
Players
Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.
Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Lille: 5 corners, 2 led to a shot; Brest: 2 corners, 2 led to a shot, 1 set-piece goal. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.
Lille
5Corners
2Led to a shot
6Free kicks, their half
4Set-piece shots
0.21Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
Click an arrow to pick out one corner.
Brest
2Corners
2Led to a shot
4Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.39Set-piece xG
1Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
Click an arrow to pick out one corner.
goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick
Who stood out — the most valuable players
Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.
Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Lille
Brest
Every player — the full numbers
Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.
Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
