Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportLigue 1 2026-10-18

Paris FC v Rennes

Paris FCHome
4–3
RennesAway
3.213.19expected goals
3.544.02xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (3.21 – 3.19 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Paris FC
Rennes
Possession (share of passes)
52.6%47.4%
Duels
4646
Duels won
47.8%32.6%
Aerial duels
2323
Aerial duels won
149
Successful dribbles
98
Passes
554500
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Paris FC above the line, Rennes below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
1.543.084.62Pablo Pagis — save, 0.07 xGLassine Sinayoko — save, 0.09 xGSamir Chergui — save, 0.05 xGAdama Camara — save, 0.06 xGMaxime Lopez — goal, 0.32 xGPablo Pagis — save, 0.13 xGPierre Lees-Melou — save, 0.07 xGIlan Kebbal — save, 0.06 xGDjaoui Cissé — save, 0.05 xGDjaoui Cissé — save, 0.05 xGEstéban Lepaul — save, 0.05 xGEstéban Lepaul — goal, 0.79 xGLuca Koleosho — save, 0.04 xGLudovic Blas — save, 0.04 xGLassine Sinayoko — miss, 0.12 xGLuca Koleosho — miss, 0.08 xGHamari Traoré — save, 0.04 xGLassine Sinayoko — miss, 0.05 xGMaxime Lopez — goal, 0.65 xGBryan Reynolds — save, 0.35 xGPablo Pagis — save, 0.04 xGLuca Koleosho — save, 0.18 xGMahdi Camara — save, 0.05 xGEstéban Lepaul — goal, 0.79 xGLassine Sinayoko — save, 0.14 xGLassine Sinayoko — goal, 0.22 xGMousa Al Tamari — miss, 0.03 xGEstéban Lepaul — goal, 0.79 xGMousa Al Tamari — save, 0.13 xGMahdi Camara — save, 0.08 xGLassine Sinayoko — goal, 0.79 xG3.213.19Pablo Pagis — save, 0.36 xGOTLassine Sinayoko — save, 0.04 xGOTSamir Chergui — save, 0.06 xGOTAdama Camara — save, 0.02 xGOTMaxime Lopez — goal, 0.19 xGOTPablo Pagis — save, 0.09 xGOTPierre Lees-Melou — save, 0.03 xGOTIlan Kebbal — save, 0.04 xGOTDjaoui Cissé — save, 0.11 xGOTDjaoui Cissé — save, 0.05 xGOTEstéban Lepaul — save, 0.02 xGOTEstéban Lepaul — goal, 0.99 xGOTLuca Koleosho — save, 0.05 xGOTLudovic Blas — save, 0.31 xGOTHamari Traoré — save, 0.06 xGOTMaxime Lopez — goal, 0.83 xGOTBryan Reynolds — save, 0.43 xGOTPablo Pagis — save, 0.03 xGOTLuca Koleosho — save, 0.22 xGOTMahdi Camara — save, 0.03 xGOTEstéban Lepaul — goal, 0.97 xGOTLassine Sinayoko — save, 0.07 xGOTLassine Sinayoko — goal, 0.49 xGOTEstéban Lepaul — goal, 0.99 xGOTMousa Al Tamari — save, 0.10 xGOTMahdi Camara — save, 0.03 xGOTLassine Sinayoko — goal, 0.97 xGOT3.544.020'15'30'45'60'75'90'
Paris FCRennessolid = xG31 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Paris FC
Rennes

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Paris FC or Rennes got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 7 of 7 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Paris FC

The question
When Paris FC has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Paris FC's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 30.9% of the time on the ball31%Progression: 43.1% of the time on the ball43%Chance creation: 23.1% of the time on the ball23%Attacking transition: 3.0% of the time on the ball43%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up30.9%
Progression43.1%
Chance creation23.1%
Attacking transition3.0%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Paris FC spends most of its time on the ball (43% of its time on the ball).

Rennes

The question
When Rennes has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Rennes's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 34.8% of the time on the ball35%Progression: 38.6% of the time on the ball39%Chance creation: 24.6% of the time on the ball25%Attacking transition: 1.9% of the time on the ball39%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up34.8%
Progression38.6%
Chance creation24.6%
Attacking transition1.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Rennes spends most of its time on the ball (39% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Paris FC
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Rennes
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Paris FC — 716 touches
Rennes — 640 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Paris FC

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Paris FC actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
554
ACTIONS
5%6%15%5%5%8%7%11%9%10%4%5%4%3%5%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
83
ACTIONS
4%6%17%6%2%5%6%13%8%12%2%4%1%1%12%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (15.2% of all actions). 64% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 36% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 35% defensive, 44% middle, 20% attacking.

Rennes

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Rennes actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
500
ACTIONS
7%6%12%4%2%11%10%10%7%9%6%3%2%4%7%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
115
ACTIONS
4%15%3%5%17%5%5%7%8%8%5%3%13%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the right wing of the middle third (11.7% of all actions). 57% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 43% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 31% defensive, 46% middle, 24% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Paris FC
33%Left side29%Middle38%Right sideATTACKING →
L
33%29%38%
R
Rennes
38%Left side24%Middle38%Right sideATTACKING →
L
38%24%38%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Paris FC — 37 entries, 35% through the right wing
Left wing: 10 entries (27%)1027%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 4 entries (11%)411%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 4 entries (11%)411%CENTRERight half-space: 6 entries (16%)616%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 13 entries (35%)1335%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Rennes — 33 entries, 39% through the left wing
Left wing: 13 entries (39%)1339%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 8 entries (24%)824%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 1 entries (3%)13%CENTRERight half-space: 3 entries (9%)39%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 8 entries (24%)824%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Paris FC

The football question
How does Paris FC progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

197build-up passes attempted
83%completed
19%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

77CB · 47%
61Wide → FB · 37%
25Central · 15%
CB77 · 47%
left: 46 passes, most from Coppola46right: 31 passes, most from Chergui31
Wide → FB61 · 37%
right: 38 passes, most from Lopez38left: 23 passes, most from Trapp23
Central25 · 15%
left: 13 passes, most from Trapp13right: 12 passes, most from Trapp12
◆ Vision AI Insight
Paris FC build predominantly down the left, with Coppola as the fulcrum (37 build-up passes). Only 19% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (14×).

Rennes

The football question
How does Rennes progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

157build-up passes attempted
85%completed
23%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third

Pass types

58CB · 44%
6Long Wide · 5%
1Long Central · 1%
51Wide → FB · 38%
17Central · 13%
CB58 · 44%
right: 32 passes, most from Cresswell32left: 26 passes, most from Rouault26
Long Wide6 · 5%
left: 4 passes, most from Samba4right: 2 passes, most from Samba2
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB51 · 38%
right: 42 passes, most from Samba42left: 9 passes, most from Samba9
Central17 · 13%
right: 11 passes, most from Szymanski11left: 6 passes, most from Samba6
◆ Vision AI Insight
Rennes build predominantly down the right, with Samba as the fulcrum (31 build-up passes). Only 25% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (19×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Paris FC

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 41 progressive passes across 1 match (41.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
34%
Right half-space
17%
Central
2%
Left half-space
24%
Left wing
22%
Progression is right-dominant: 51% right side · 2% central · 46% left.

Who generates it

Ilan Kebbal
8 · 20%
Pablo Pagis
8 · 20%
Hamari Traoré
5 · 12%
Adama Camara
5 · 12%
Pierre Lees-Melou
5 · 12%
Top two — Ilan Kebbal & Pablo Pagis — account for 39% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
41.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
24% reach final third
24% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 76% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 24% of progressive passes reached the final third and 24% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 39% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spaceefficient
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingsterile

Rennes

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 32 progressive passes across 1 match (32.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
41%
Right half-space
3%
Central
12%
Left half-space
12%
Left wing
31%
Progression is central-dominant: 44% right side · 12% central · 44% left.

Who generates it

Mahdi Camara
5 · 16%
Bryan Reynolds
4 · 12%
Przemyslaw Frankowski
4 · 12%
Sebastian Szymanski
3 · 9%
Aboubakar Nagida
3 · 9%
Top two — Mahdi Camara & Bryan Reynolds — account for 28% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
32.0 prog passes/game
mostly central
→
PENETRATION
28% reach final third
9% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 72% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 28% of progressive passes reached the final third and 9% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 28% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the central side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingsterile
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Paris FC

The question
Where do Paris FC's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

19shots
3.2xG
0.17xG per shot
3big chances (0.3+ xG)
4goals
Attacking transition: 2 shots (11%)11%2Settled attack: 13 shots (68%)68%13Set piece: 4 shots (21%)21%419SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 11% of shots210.360.18
Pass into the box / short pass210.360.18
Settled attack 68% of shots1321.850.14
Cut-back200.250.13
Pass into the box / short pass910.900.10
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)210.700.35
Set piece 21% of shots411.000.25
Corner300.200.07
Penalty110.790.79

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Ilan Kebbal50.711
Lassine Sinayoko30.471
Adama Camara30.250
Luca Koleosho10.040
Pierre Lees-Melou10.040

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Lassine Sinayoko61.422
Maxime Lopez20.972
Luca Koleosho30.300
Pablo Pagis30.230
Pierre Lees-Melou10.070
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Paris FC's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.9 of 3.2 xG, 13 of 19 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 2 of the 19 shots (11%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 4 of the 19 shots came from set pieces; 4 goals from 3.2 xG (+0.8).

Rennes

The question
Where do Rennes's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

12shots
3.2xG
0.27xG per shot
4big chances (0.3+ xG)
3goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (25%)25%3Settled attack: 5 shots (42%)42%5Set piece: 4 shots (33%)33%412SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 25% of shots300.220.07
Long ball100.130.13
Pass into the box / short pass200.090.05
Settled attack 42% of shots500.520.10
Long ball100.350.35
Pass into the box / short pass200.090.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.070.04
Set piece 33% of shots432.460.61
Corner100.080.08
Penalty332.380.79

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Valentin Rongier10.350
Estéban Lepaul30.210
Bryan Reynolds10.050
Adrien Thomasson10.050

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Estéban Lepaul42.443
Bryan Reynolds10.350
Mousa Al Tamari20.150
Mahdi Camara20.120
Djaoui Cissé20.090
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Rennes's chances, by xG, is set piece (2.5 of 3.2 xG, 4 of 12 shots), mostly penalty. 3 of the 12 shots (25%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 4 of the 12 shots came from set pieces; 3 goals from 3.2 xG (-0.2).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Paris FC

The question
How does Paris FC deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

7 crosses: 1 found a team-mate (14%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 5 cut-backs: 4 found a team-mate (80%), 2 led to a shot (40%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Rennes

The question
How does Rennes deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

18 crosses: 2 found a team-mate (11%), 1 led to a shot (6%). 4 cut-backs: 1 found a team-mate (25%), 0 led to a shot (0%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Paris FC

The question
Which part of the final third does Paris FC actually cross from?

7 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (14%)14%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 1 crosses (14%)14%1advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 1 crosses (14%)14%1byline right wing: 1 crosses (14%)14%1byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 3 crosses (43%)43%3
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing343%0
deep · right wing114%0
advanced · right wing114%0
advanced · left wing114%0
byline · right wing114%0

Rennes

The question
Which part of the final third does Rennes actually cross from?

18 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 2 crosses (11%)11%2deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 5 crosses (28%)28%5advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 3 crosses (17%)17%3byline right wing: 2 crosses (11%)11%2byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 6 crosses (33%)33%6
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing633%1
advanced · right wing528%0
advanced · left wing317%0
deep · right wing211%0
byline · right wing211%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+2.95Paris FC on-ball value
+3.18Rennes on-ball value
+0.0+1.6+3.2HALF TIME+2.95+3.180′15′30′45′60′75′90′
Paris FCRennesEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Paris FC — where the value came from
Passes554 actions+1.01
Carries83 actions-0.12
Dribbles15 actions+0.22
Shots19 actions+1.57
Ball wins57 actions+0.28
Rennes — where the value came from
Passes500 actions-0.25
Carries115 actions+0.18
Dribbles19 actions+0.05
Shots12 actions+2.85
Ball wins52 actions+0.35
Paris FC — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Adama Camara67+1.058
Maxime Lopez79+1.006
Ilan Kebbal79+0.765
Pablo Pagis49+0.313
Lassine Sinayoko38+0.262
Diego Coppola (lowest)82-0.425
Rennes — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Estéban Lepaul37+2.433
Bryan Reynolds66+0.260
Mahdi Camara34+0.231
Przemyslaw Frankowski27+0.165
Sebastian Szymanski69+0.106
Valentin Rongier (lowest)56-0.187
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Paris FC

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

9 of 29 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%9/29Camara4 of 32 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%4/32Lopez12 of 83 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%12/83Trapp2 of 28 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%2/28Traoré7 of 25 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%7/25Traoré6 of 44 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%6/44Kebbal6 of 41 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%6/41Kebbal4 of 59 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%4/59Lees-Melou4 of 49 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%4/49Coppola9 of 53 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%9/53Pagis4 of 20 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%4/20Camara7 of 27 pass attempts lost here (26%).26%7/27Lopez1 of 21 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%1/21Chergui5 of 18 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%5/18Koleosho8 of 25 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%8/25Koleoshoattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
25
Failed forward pass
18
Failed take-on
6
Lost in the defensive third
34
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the attacking third: 32% of 25 pass attempts there are lost (8 times). Separately, 28% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Rennes

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

8 of 36 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%8/36Cresswell7 of 29 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%7/29Cresswell7 of 62 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%7/62Samba1 of 19 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%1/19Samba11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.12 of 53 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%12/53Cresswell9 of 52 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%9/52Szymanski7 of 50 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%7/50Rouault8 of 35 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%8/35Szymanski5 of 43 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%5/43Nagida8 of 32 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%8/32Reynolds14 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.7 of 20 pass attempts lost here (35%).35%7/20Lepaul13 of 33 pass attempts lost here (39%).39%13/33Szymanskiattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
32
Failed forward pass
25
Failed take-on
11
Lost in the defensive third
24
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the attacking third: 39% of 33 pass attempts there are lost (13 times). Separately, 33% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Paris FC

Not just press intensity, but where the 162 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
14%
Middle third
36%
Own third
50%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 5.1 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 14% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 36% in midfield.

Where they win it back

111634101014612121568DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

Rennes

Not just press intensity, but where the 155 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
19%
Middle third
39%
Own third
42%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 5.2 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 19% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 39% in midfield.

Where they win it back

93113815101071851158DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Paris FC

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Paris FC win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 26 opposition possessions that Paris FC ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.5passes
median 3 · before Paris FC win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
12sec
median 5s · 26.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
46%
19%
19%
15%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.5
12s
15–30′

too few
30–45+′
3.5
8s
45–60′
4.0
8s
60–75′
4.8
13s
75–90+′
4.2
11s
average passesaverage seconds

Rennes

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Rennes win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 33 opposition possessions that Rennes ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
6.0passes
median 4 · before Rennes win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
15sec
median 8s · 33.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
21%
52%
6%
21%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
10.8
32s
15–30′
6.8
16s
30–45+′
6.5
18s
45–60′
2.3
7s
60–75′
5.2
12s
75–90+′
5.3
11s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Paris FC — 162 actions, 125 won
Rennes — 155 actions, 108 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Paris FC — 83 wins · 4% in the final third, 31% midfield, 65% own third
own third, right: 13 of 83 wins (16%)16%13 winsown third, centre: 29 of 83 wins (35%)35%29 winsown third, left: 12 of 83 wins (14%)14%12 winsmidfield, right: 8 of 83 wins (10%)10%8 winsmidfield, centre: 11 of 83 wins (13%)13%11 winsmidfield, left: 7 of 83 wins (8%)8%7 winsfinal third, right: 3 of 83 wins (4%)4%3 winsfinal third, centre: 0 of 83 wins (0%)final third, left: 0 of 83 wins (0%)
Highest winsTypeMinx
Lassine Sinayokoball-recovery13′79
Moustapha Mbowball-recovery96′76
Moustapha Mbowtackle96′76
Pierre Lees-Melouinterception55′65
Ilan Kebbalball-recovery80′65
Rennes — 77 wins · 6% in the final third, 42% midfield, 52% own third
own third, right: 4 of 77 wins (5%)5%4 winsown third, centre: 28 of 77 wins (36%)36%28 winsown third, left: 8 of 77 wins (10%)10%8 winsmidfield, right: 12 of 77 wins (16%)16%12 winsmidfield, centre: 8 of 77 wins (10%)10%8 winsmidfield, left: 12 of 77 wins (16%)16%12 winsfinal third, right: 2 of 77 wins (3%)3%2 winsfinal third, centre: 2 of 77 wins (3%)3%2 winsfinal third, left: 1 of 77 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Ludovic Blasinterception17′87
Djaoui Cisséball-recovery25′83
Djaoui Cisséball-recovery26′76
Sebastian Szymanskiball-recovery52′70
Djaoui Cisséball-recovery62′68
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Paris FC

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Paris FC? 32 opponent progressive passes and 12 shots faced (3.2 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Paris FC)

Right wing
25%
Right half-space
5%
Central
18%
Left half-space
20%
Left wing
32%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (32% of the danger conceded).

Rennes

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Rennes? 41 opponent progressive passes and 19 shots faced (3.2 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Rennes)

Right wing
36%
Right half-space
19%
Central
6%
Left half-space
21%
Left wing
18%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (36% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Paris FC

Build-up (own third)

safer, quicker, shorter passing

right 29% · centre 46% · left 25%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
228
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+7.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
13%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
49% of 61
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
48%
Progression (middle third)

safer

right 33% · centre 30% · left 37%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
289
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
13%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
42% of 67
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
48%
Final third

safer, narrow, central, played inside

right 41% · centre 19% · left 40%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
135
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.4 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
13%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
5%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
39% of 36
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
44%

Rennes

Build-up (own third)

safer, right-sided, playing short

right 43% · centre 39% · left 18%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
191
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+7.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
20%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.1 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
56% of 50
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
46%
Progression (middle third)

safer, shorter passing, right-sided

right 44% · centre 24% · left 32%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
288
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
17%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
36% of 72
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
47%
Final third

safer

right 40% · centre 12% · left 48%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
155
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+1.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
24%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.2 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
21% of 33
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
64%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Paris FC
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Expected goals3.21vs 1.34
Threat from passing6.72vs 4.51
Progressive carries26vs 36
PPDA5.1vs 6.6
Pass accuracy84%vs 86%
Rennes
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Threat from passing3.66vs 6.65
Expected goals3.19vs 1.61
Progressive passes32vs 53
Defensive actions155vs 163
Final-third entries33vs 41

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Paris FC

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
11%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
51%
Safe / backward
36%
13% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 87% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Rennes

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
11%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
53%
Safe / backward
35%
12% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 88% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Paris FC: 3 corners, 2 led to a shot; Rennes: 4 corners, 1 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Paris FC

3Corners
2Led to a shot
5Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.20Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
33%1 corner33%1 corner33%1 from the left flag2 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Rennes

4Corners
1Led to a shot
2Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.08Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
25%25%1 corner25%1 corner25%4 from the left flag0 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Paris FC
Rennes

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report