Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportLigue 1 2026-10-25

Marseille v Le Havre

MarseilleHome
4–3
Le HavreAway
0.972.35expected goals
1.351.92xG on target (xGOT)

Marseille won the match; Le Havre won the chances (0.97 – 2.35 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Marseille
Le Havre
Possession (share of passes)
52.8%47.2%
Duels
5448
Duels won
33.3%52.1%
Aerial duels
2525
Aerial duels won
817
Successful dribbles
89
Passes
518463
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Marseille above the line, Le Havre below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.901.802.71Nayef Aguerd — save, 0.03 xGCJ Egan-Riley — goal, 0.10 xGEnzo Koffi — save, 0.03 xGMbwana Samatta — miss, 0.11 xGAmir Richardson — save, 0.05 xGEmerson — save, 0.03 xGPierre-Emile Højbjerg — miss, 0.04 xGHimad Abdelli — miss, 0.05 xGDjibril Ouziad — miss, 0.10 xGPierre-Emile Højbjerg — miss, 0.11 xGRayan Fofana — save, 0.05 xGRayan Fofana — save, 0.10 xGTimothy Weah — goal, 0.15 xGDjibril Ouziad — miss, 0.07 xGDjibril Ouziad — miss, 0.09 xGHimad Abdelli — miss, 0.03 xGAyumu Seko — miss, 0.05 xGIgor Paixão — goal, 0.23 xGHimad Abdelli — goal, 0.15 xGIgor Paixão — save, 0.03 xGJosh Maja — save, 0.18 xGSimon Ebonog — miss, 0.02 xGSota Nakamura — miss, 0.07 xGJosh Maja — goal, 0.79 xGRayan Fofana — miss, 0.04 xGLamine N'Diaye — save, 0.04 xGSota Nakamura — save, 0.06 xGLamine N'Diaye — goal, 0.19 xGJosh Maja — goal, 0.08 xGKaito Mizuta — save, 0.12 xGAyumu Seko — miss, 0.04 xGKaito Mizuta — miss, 0.07 xG0.972.35Nayef Aguerd — save, 0.03 xGOTCJ Egan-Riley — goal, 0.18 xGOTEnzo Koffi — save, 0.04 xGOTAmir Richardson — save, 0.02 xGOTEmerson — save, 0.14 xGOTRayan Fofana — save, 0.07 xGOTRayan Fofana — save, 0.06 xGOTTimothy Weah — goal, 0.53 xGOTIgor Paixão — goal, 0.11 xGOTHimad Abdelli — goal, 0.27 xGOTIgor Paixão — save, 0.09 xGOTJosh Maja — save, 0.12 xGOTJosh Maja — goal, 0.99 xGOTLamine N'Diaye — save, 0.04 xGOTSota Nakamura — save, 0.10 xGOTLamine N'Diaye — goal, 0.06 xGOTJosh Maja — goal, 0.37 xGOTKaito Mizuta — save, 0.05 xGOT1.351.920'15'30'45'60'75'90'
MarseilleLe Havresolid = xG32 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Marseille
Le Havre

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Marseille or Le Havre got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 7 of 7 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Marseille

The question
When Marseille has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Marseille's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 23.4% of the time on the ball23%Progression: 39.0% of the time on the ball39%Chance creation: 36.5% of the time on the ball36%Attacking transition: 1.1% of the time on the ball39%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up23.4%
Progression39.0%
Chance creation36.5%
Attacking transition1.1%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Marseille spends most of its time on the ball (39% of its time on the ball).

Le Havre

The question
When Le Havre has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Le Havre's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 23.2% of the time on the ball23%Progression: 48.3% of the time on the ball48%Chance creation: 26.8% of the time on the ball27%Attacking transition: 1.7% of the time on the ball48%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up23.2%
Progression48.3%
Chance creation26.8%
Attacking transition1.7%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Le Havre spends most of its time on the ball (48% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Marseille
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Le Havre
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Marseille — 700 touches
Le Havre — 610 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Marseille

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Marseille actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
518
ACTIONS
3%4%9%6%5%8%6%7%11%11%10%5%3%5%9%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
138
ACTIONS
4%6%8%7%2%8%7%10%11%12%12%5%2%7%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the left wing of the middle third (11.3% of all actions). 55% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 45% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 27% defensive, 43% middle, 30% attacking.

Le Havre

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Le Havre actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
463
ACTIONS
5%2%7%5%4%10%11%11%11%11%5%3%3%4%8%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
117
ACTIONS
3%4%6%2%3%13%9%18%11%15%4%3%5%5%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (12.2% of all actions). 57% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 43% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 22% defensive, 55% middle, 23% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Marseille leaned on their left (47%); Le Havre leaned on their left (38%).

Marseille
47%Left side18%Middle36%Right sideATTACKING →
L
47%18%36%
R
Le Havre
38%Left side27%Middle35%Right sideATTACKING →
L
38%27%35%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Marseille — 46 entries, 39% through the left wing
Left wing: 18 entries (39%)1839%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 6 entries (13%)613%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 2 entries (4%)24%CENTRERight half-space: 5 entries (11%)511%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 15 entries (33%)1533%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Le Havre — 43 entries, 37% through the left wing
Left wing: 16 entries (37%)1637%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 8 entries (19%)819%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 3 entries (7%)37%CENTRERight half-space: 6 entries (14%)614%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 10 entries (23%)1023%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Marseille

The football question
How does Marseille progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

138build-up passes attempted
83%completed
22%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

43CB · 38%
11Long Wide · 10%
2Long Central · 2%
52Wide → FB · 46%
6Central · 5%
CB43 · 38%
left: 23 passes, most from Aguerd23right: 20 passes, most from Egan-Riley20
Long Wide11 · 10%
left: 7 passes, most from Lange7right: 4 passes, most from Lange4
Long Central2 · 2%
Wide → FB52 · 46%
left: 29 passes, most from Lange29right: 23 passes, most from Weah23
Central6 · 5%
right: 4 passes, most from Højbjerg4left: 2 passes, most from Nnadi2
◆ Vision AI Insight
Marseille build predominantly down the right, with Lange as the fulcrum (25 build-up passes). Only 23% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (11×).

Le Havre

The football question
How does Le Havre progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

109build-up passes attempted
87%completed
34%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

41CB · 43%
11Long Wide · 12%
37Wide → FB · 39%
6Central · 6%
CB41 · 43%
left: 25 passes, most from Touba25right: 16 passes, most from Seko16
Long Wide11 · 12%
left: 6 passes, most from Gallon6right: 5 passes, most from Gallon5
Wide → FB37 · 39%
left: 23 passes, most from Koffi23right: 14 passes, most from Gallon14
Central6 · 6%
left: 3 passes, most from Gallon3right: 3 passes, most from Gallon3
◆ Vision AI Insight
Le Havre build predominantly down the left, with Gallon as the fulcrum (27 build-up passes). Only 34% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is LHS def → LW mid (8×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Marseille

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 47 progressive passes across 1 match (47.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
32%
Right half-space
9%
Central
11%
Left half-space
15%
Left wing
34%
Progression is left-dominant: 40% right side · 11% central · 49% left.

Who generates it

Timothy Weah
9 · 19%
Emerson
7 · 15%
Amine Harit
7 · 15%
Igor Paixão
5 · 11%
Jeffrey de Lange
5 · 11%
Top two — Timothy Weah & Emerson — account for 34% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
47.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
13% reach final third
17% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 87% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 13% of progressive passes reached the final third and 17% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 34% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced

Le Havre

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 48 progressive passes across 1 match (48.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
42%
Right half-space
10%
Central
10%
Left half-space
6%
Left wing
31%
Progression is right-dominant: 52% right side · 10% central · 38% left.

Who generates it

Djibril Ouziad
10 · 21%
Ayumu Seko
6 · 12%
Ahmed Touba
5 · 10%
Lamine N'Diaye
5 · 10%
Junior Mwanga
4 · 8%
Top two — Djibril Ouziad & Ayumu Seko — account for 33% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
48.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
25% reach final third
17% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 75% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 25% of progressive passes reached the final third and 17% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 33% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacesterile
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Marseille

The question
Where do Marseille's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

11shots
1.0xG
0.09xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
4goals
Attacking transition: 3 shots (27%)27%3Settled attack: 5 shots (45%)45%5Set piece: 3 shots (27%)27%311SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 27% of shots310.310.10
Cut-back100.110.11
Pass into the box / short pass100.050.05
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)110.150.15
Settled attack 45% of shots520.480.10
Cut-back110.230.23
Pass into the box / short pass200.070.03
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)210.180.09
Set piece 27% of shots310.170.06
Corner310.170.06

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Amine Gouiri10.231
Igor Paixão20.150
Amine Harit10.050
Pierre-Emile Højbjerg10.030

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Igor Paixão20.271
Himad Abdelli30.231
Pierre-Emile Højbjerg20.160
Timothy Weah10.151
CJ Egan-Riley10.101
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Marseille's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.5 of 1.0 xG, 5 of 11 shots), mostly cut-back. 3 of the 11 shots (27%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 3 of the 11 shots came from set pieces; 4 goals from 1.0 xG (+3.0).

Le Havre

The question
Where do Le Havre's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

21shots
2.4xG
0.11xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
3goals
Attacking transition: 5 shots (24%)24%5Settled attack: 14 shots (67%)67%14Set piece: 2 shots (10%)10%221SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 24% of shots500.330.07
Cross100.110.11
Pass into the box / short pass300.170.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.050.05
Settled attack 67% of shots1421.200.09
Cross310.210.07
Cut-back200.280.14
Long ball200.110.05
Pass into the box / short pass510.420.08
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.190.09
Set piece 10% of shots210.820.41
Corner100.030.03
Penalty110.790.79

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Kaito Mizuta30.342
Sota Nakamura10.180
Mbwana Samatta20.150
Djibril Ouziad20.130
Ayumu Seko20.120

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Josh Maja31.062
Djibril Ouziad30.250
Lamine N'Diaye20.231
Rayan Fofana30.190
Kaito Mizuta20.180
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Le Havre's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.2 of 2.4 xG, 14 of 21 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 5 of the 21 shots (24%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 21 shots came from set pieces; 3 goals from 2.4 xG (+0.6).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Marseille

The question
How does Marseille deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

9 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (56%), 1 led to a shot (11%). 9 cut-backs: 3 found a team-mate (33%), 2 led to a shot (22%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Le Havre

The question
How does Le Havre deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

26 crosses: 7 found a team-mate (27%), 4 led to a shot (15%). 3 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (67%), 2 led to a shot (67%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Marseille

The question
Which part of the final third does Marseille actually cross from?

9 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 2 crosses (22%)22%2advanced right half-space: 1 crosses (11%)11%1advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (22%)22%2byline right wing: 2 crosses (22%)22%2byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 1 crosses (11%)11%1byline left wing: 1 crosses (11%)11%1
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing222%0
advanced · left wing222%1
byline · right wing222%0
advanced · right half-space111%0
byline · left half-space111%0
byline · left wing111%0

Le Havre

The question
Which part of the final third does Le Havre actually cross from?

26 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (4%)4%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (4%)4%1advanced right wing: 3 crosses (12%)12%3advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 5 crosses (19%)19%5byline right wing: 4 crosses (15%)15%4byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 1 crosses (4%)4%1byline left wing: 11 crosses (42%)42%11
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · left wing1142%1
advanced · left wing519%1
byline · right wing415%1
advanced · right wing312%1
deep · right wing14%0
deep · left wing14%0
byline · left half-space14%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+1.79Marseille on-ball value
+2.47Le Havre on-ball value
+0.0+1.3+2.5HALF TIME+1.79+2.470′15′30′45′60′75′90′
MarseilleLe HavreEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Marseille — where the value came from
Passes518 actions+1.13
Carries138 actions-0.05
Dribbles20 actions-0.02
Shots11 actions+0.27
Ball wins63 actions+0.45
Le Havre — where the value came from
Passes463 actions+0.58
Carries117 actions+0.17
Dribbles17 actions+0.03
Shots21 actions+1.45
Ball wins52 actions+0.25
Marseille — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Amine Gouiri19+0.423
Emerson91+0.420
Timothy Weah84+0.334
Igor Paixão50+0.238
Himad Abdelli84+0.151
Pierre-Emile Højbjerg (lowest)101-0.088
Le Havre — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Josh Maja15+0.932
Kaito Mizuta17+0.299
Djibril Ouziad56+0.225
Sota Nakamura32+0.204
Ahmed Touba66+0.200
Enzo Koffi (lowest)57-0.034
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Marseille

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

2 of 17 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%2/17Egan-Riley2 of 20 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%2/20Lange9 of 45 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%9/45Lange4 of 30 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%4/30Aguerd7 of 26 pass attempts lost here (27%).27%7/26Emerson5 of 39 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%5/39Weah2 of 29 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%2/29Weah5 of 36 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%5/36Højbjerg6 of 57 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%6/57Nnadi8 of 57 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%8/57Emerson8 of 51 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%8/51Weah6 of 25 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%6/25Weah13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 of 26 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%6/26Emerson4 of 47 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%4/47Emersonattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
26
Failed forward pass
13
Failed take-on
12
Lost in the defensive third
24
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 27% of 26 pass attempts there are lost (7 times). Separately, 34% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Le Havre

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

7 of 23 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%7/23Seko11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.2 of 33 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%2/33Gallon1 of 22 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%1/22Touba3 of 20 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%3/20Richardson13 of 44 pass attempts lost here (30%).30%13/44Ouziad8 of 51 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%8/51Ndiaye3 of 50 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%3/50Ndiaye3 of 49 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%3/49Mwanga12 of 49 pass attempts lost here (24%).24%12/49Koffi9 of 25 pass attempts lost here (36%).36%9/25Ouziad13 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 of 16 pass attempts lost here (50%).50%8/16Ndiaye3 of 19 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%3/19Nakamura17 of 38 pass attempts lost here (45%).45%17/38Koffiattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
45
Failed forward pass
35
Failed take-on
8
Lost in the defensive third
14
Their weakest zone is the central in the attacking third: 50% of 16 pass attempts there are lost (8 times). Separately, 46% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Marseille

Not just press intensity, but where the 177 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
14%
Middle third
30%
Own third
56%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.3 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 14% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 30% in midfield.

Where they win it back

12163716191281281367DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

Le Havre

Not just press intensity, but where the 146 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
20%
Middle third
32%
Own third
49%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 4.9 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 20% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 32% in midfield.

Where they win it back

914261210131091155115DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Marseille

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Marseille win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 32 opposition possessions that Marseille ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
4.1passes
median 3 · before Marseille win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
11sec
median 6s · 32.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
44%
28%
22%
6%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.1
10s
15–30′
2.0
9s
30–45+′
3.5
8s
45–60′
4.3
10s
60–75′
3.2
6s
75–90+′
5.5
17s
average passesaverage seconds

Le Havre

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Le Havre win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 31 opposition possessions that Le Havre ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
5.6passes
median 5 · before Le Havre win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
15sec
median 14s · 31.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
32%
32%
19%
16%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
6.6
17s
15–30′
4.8
14s
30–45+′
7.2
17s
45–60′

too few
60–75′
4.4
12s
75–90+′
5.2
17s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Marseille — 177 actions, 126 won
Le Havre — 146 actions, 112 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Marseille — 103 wins · 11% in the final third, 18% midfield, 71% own third
own third, right: 18 of 103 wins (17%)17%18 winsown third, centre: 32 of 103 wins (31%)31%32 winsown third, left: 23 of 103 wins (22%)22%23 winsmidfield, right: 8 of 103 wins (8%)8%8 winsmidfield, centre: 5 of 103 wins (5%)5%5 winsmidfield, left: 6 of 103 wins (6%)6%6 winsfinal third, right: 4 of 103 wins (4%)4%4 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 103 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 6 of 103 wins (6%)6%6 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Igor Paixãotackle37′82
Himad Abdelliball-recovery16′81
Timothy Weahtackle32′81
Himad Abdelliball-recovery19′76
Neal Maupayball-recovery81′76
Le Havre — 75 wins · 11% in the final third, 25% midfield, 64% own third
own third, right: 9 of 75 wins (12%)12%9 winsown third, centre: 26 of 75 wins (35%)35%26 winsown third, left: 13 of 75 wins (17%)17%13 winsmidfield, right: 9 of 75 wins (12%)12%9 winsmidfield, centre: 3 of 75 wins (4%)4%3 winsmidfield, left: 7 of 75 wins (9%)9%7 winsfinal third, right: 2 of 75 wins (3%)3%2 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 75 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 5 of 75 wins (7%)7%5 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Simon Ebonogball-recovery7′84
Rassoul Ndiayeball-recovery31′78
Rayan Fofanaball-recovery22′76
Mbwana Samattaball-recovery40′72
Sota Nakamuraball-recovery70′72
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Marseille

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Marseille? 48 opponent progressive passes and 21 shots faced (2.4 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Marseille)

Right wing
35%
Right half-space
10%
Central
8%
Left half-space
8%
Left wing
40%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (40% of the danger conceded).

Le Havre

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Le Havre? 47 opponent progressive passes and 11 shots faced (1.0 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Le Havre)

Right wing
33%
Right half-space
11%
Central
11%
Left half-space
13%
Left wing
32%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (33% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Marseille

Build-up (own third)

safer, more recycling, left-sided

right 25% · centre 40% · left 35%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
176
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+9.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
22%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
54% of 54
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
48%
Progression (middle third)

safer, left-sided, shorter passing

right 28% · centre 23% · left 49%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
290
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.1 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
47% of 64
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
50%
Final third

safer, shorter passing, kept on the floor

right 48% · centre 10% · left 42%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
210
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
-0.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
18%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
3%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
22% of 40
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
40%

Le Havre

Build-up (own third)

safer, played in the channels, touchline to touchline

right 30% · centre 38% · left 32%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
131
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+8.9 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
18%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.1 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
73% of 48
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
25%
Progression (middle third)

safer

right 34% · centre 30% · left 36%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
326
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.2 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
24%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.4 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
51% of 72
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
50%
Final third

safer, less recycling, attacking the next line

right 33% · centre 20% · left 47%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
140
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
15%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
38% of 48
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
40%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Marseille
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Defensive actions177vs 142
Progressive carries41vs 56
Expected goals0.97vs 1.55
Passes518vs 625
Progressive passes47vs 42
Le Havre
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Expected goals2.35vs 1.48
Defensive actions146vs 166
Field tilt43%vs 53%
PPDA4.9vs 4.5
Progressive passes48vs 45

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Marseille

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
15%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
44%
Safe / backward
40%
16% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 84% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Le Havre

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
16%
Progressive
1%
Neutral / sideways
51%
Safe / backward
32%
17% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 83% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Marseille: 4 corners, 2 led to a shot, 1 set-piece goal; Le Havre: 3 corners, 1 led to a shot.

Marseille

4Corners
2Led to a shot
6Free kicks, their half
3Set-piece shots
0.17Set-piece xG
1Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
25%1 corner50%25%1 corner0 from the left flag4 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Le Havre

3Corners
1Led to a shot
6Free kicks, their half
1Set-piece shots
0.03Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
67%33%1 corner2 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Marseille
Le Havre

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report