Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportLigue 1 2026-10-25

Monaco v Lille

MonacoHome
1–1
LilleAway
2.010.52expected goals
1.030.90xG on target (xGOT)

Drawn on the scoreboard, but Monaco created the better chances (2.01 – 0.52 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Monaco
Lille
Possession (share of passes)
62.9%37.1%
Duels
3334
Duels won
51.5%50.0%
Aerial duels
1616
Aerial duels won
79
Successful dribbles
64
Passes
655387
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

MomentumShot mapGoal sequences

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Monaco above the line, Lille below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.771.542.31Vanderson — save, 0.03 xGNabil Bentaleb — save, 0.03 xGParis Brunner — miss, 0.06 xGEthan Mbappé — goal, 0.30 xGDenis Zakaria — save, 0.03 xGNathan Ngoy — save, 0.09 xGAleksandr Golovin — save, 0.03 xGVanderson — save, 0.21 xGMatthis Abline — save, 0.07 xGEdan Diop — miss, 0.04 xGParis Brunner — miss, 0.65 xGLamine Camara — miss, 0.03 xGEdan Diop — goal, 0.04 xGMatthis Abline — miss, 0.10 xGSadibou Sané — miss, 0.08 xGAleksandr Golovin — save, 0.07 xGParis Brunner — miss, 0.15 xGAleksandr Golovin — miss, 0.03 xGVanderson — save, 0.07 xGJordan Teze — miss, 0.04 xGFlávio Nazinho — miss, 0.13 xGMaurits Kjærgaard — save, 0.10 xGMatthis Abline — save, 0.07 xGVanderson — save, 0.06 xG2.010.52Vanderson — save, 0.22 xGOTNabil Bentaleb — save, 0.09 xGOTEthan Mbappé — goal, 0.68 xGOTDenis Zakaria — save, 0.04 xGOTNathan Ngoy — save, 0.09 xGOTAleksandr Golovin — save, 0.17 xGOTVanderson — save, 0.08 xGOTMatthis Abline — save, 0.04 xGOTEdan Diop — goal, 0.24 xGOTAleksandr Golovin — save, 0.07 xGOTVanderson — save, 0.03 xGOTMaurits Kjærgaard — save, 0.04 xGOTMatthis Abline — save, 0.07 xGOTVanderson — save, 0.06 xGOT1.030.900'15'30'45'60'75'90'
MonacoLillesolid = xG24 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Monaco
Lille

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Monaco or Lille got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 2 of 2 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ballWhere the time goesPassing NetworkPass ExplorerTouch DensityWhich Zones Do They Attack Through?Final-third entriesBuild-upBuild-Up — the pass mapProgressionHow They ProgressChance creationChance creationCrosses & CutbacksCrosses by TerritoryOn-Ball Value — who moved the gameWhen they lose itBall-Loss Map
Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Monaco

The question
When Monaco has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Monaco's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 24.2% of the time on the ball24%Progression: 40.2% of the time on the ball40%Chance creation: 33.2% of the time on the ball33%Attacking transition: 2.5% of the time on the ball40%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up24.2%
Progression40.2%
Chance creation33.2%
Attacking transition2.5%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Monaco spends most of its time on the ball (40% of its time on the ball).

Lille

The question
When Lille has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Lille's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 38.7% of the time on the ball39%Progression: 51.6% of the time on the ball52%Chance creation: 9.3% of the time on the ball9%Attacking transition: 0.4% of the time on the ball52%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up38.7%
Progression51.6%
Chance creation9.3%
Attacking transition0.4%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Lille spends most of its time on the ball (52% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Monaco
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD10 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Lille
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Monaco — 780 touches
Lille — 536 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Monaco

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Monaco actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
655
ACTIONS
5%5%9%3%2%9%11%10%10%8%8%5%3%6%7%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
159
ACTIONS
3%8%11%5%1%8%5%16%9%12%4%2%1%7%9%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (10.8% of all actions). 62% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 38% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 24% defensive, 48% middle, 28% attacking.

Lille

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Lille actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
387
ACTIONS
4%5%18%5%9%9%5%8%7%14%2%2%2%8%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
71
ACTIONS
4%3%10%7%7%11%11%10%13%11%1%1%1%8%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (17.0% of all actions). 54% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 46% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 41% defensive, 45% middle, 14% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Monaco leaned on their left (37%); Lille leaned on their left (56%).

Monaco
37%Left side25%Middle37%Right sideATTACKING →
L
37%25%37%
R
Lille
56%Left side14%Middle30%Right sideATTACKING →
L
56%14%30%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Monaco — 65 entries, 32% through the right wing
Left wing: 18 entries (28%)1828%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 9 entries (14%)914%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 7 entries (11%)711%CENTRERight half-space: 10 entries (15%)1015%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 21 entries (32%)2132%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Lille — 22 entries, 45% through the left wing
Left wing: 10 entries (45%)1045%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 2 entries (9%)29%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 1 entries (5%)15%CENTRERight half-space: 5 entries (23%)523%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 4 entries (18%)418%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Monaco

The football question
How does Monaco progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

153build-up passes attempted
91%completed
23%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

27CB · 19%
7Long Wide · 5%
3Long Central · 2%
59Wide → FB · 42%
43Central · 31%
CB27 · 19%
left: 16 passes, most from Teze16right: 11 passes, most from Teze11
Long Wide7 · 5%
left: 4 passes, most from Hrádecky4right: 3 passes, most from Hrádecky3
Long Central3 · 2%
right: 2 passes, most from Vanderson2
Wide → FB59 · 42%
right: 40 passes, most from Hrádecky40left: 19 passes, most from Nazinho19
Central43 · 31%
left: 26 passes, most from Hrádecky26right: 17 passes, most from Sané17
◆ Vision AI Insight
Monaco build predominantly down the right, with Sané as the fulcrum (37 build-up passes). Only 24% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → C def (13×).

Lille

The football question
How does Lille progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

165build-up passes attempted
67%completed
30%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third

Pass types

55CB · 50%
7Long Wide · 6%
40Wide → FB · 36%
9Central · 8%
CB55 · 50%
left: 31 passes, most from Alexsandro31right: 24 passes, most from Nianzou24
Long Wide7 · 6%
right: 4 passes, most from Özer4left: 3 passes, most from Özer3
Wide → FB40 · 36%
left: 29 passes, most from Perraud29right: 11 passes, most from Mukau11
Central9 · 8%
right: 5 passes, most from Özer5left: 4 passes, most from Özer4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Lille build predominantly down the right, with Alexsandro as the fulcrum (23 build-up passes). Only 31% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is RHS def → C def (8×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Monaco

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 62 progressive passes across 1 match (62.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
24%
Right half-space
23%
Central
6%
Left half-space
11%
Left wing
35%
Progression is central-dominant: 47% right side · 6% central · 47% left.

Who generates it

Vanderson
14 · 23%
Flávio Nazinho
10 · 16%
Sadibou Sané
9 · 15%
Jordan Teze
8 · 13%
Mathys Detourbet
8 · 13%
Top two — Vanderson & Flávio Nazinho — account for 39% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
62.0 prog passes/game
mostly central
→
PENETRATION
27% reach final third
31% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 73% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 27% of progressive passes reached the final third and 31% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 39% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the central side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingefficient

Lille

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 22 progressive passes across 1 match (22.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
18%
Right half-space
18%
Central
14%
Left half-space
5%
Left wing
45%
Progression is left-dominant: 36% right side · 14% central · 50% left.

Who generates it

Romain Perraud
9 · 41%
Berke Özer
3 · 14%
Benjamin André
2 · 9%
Nabil Bentaleb
2 · 9%
Ethan Mbappé
1 · 5%
Top two — Romain Perraud & Berke Özer — account for 55% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
22.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
23% reach final third
9% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 77% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 23% of progressive passes reached the final third and 9% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 55% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spaceefficient
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingsterile
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Monaco

The question
Where do Monaco's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

20shots
2.0xG
0.10xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 2 shots (10%)10%2Settled attack: 14 shots (70%)70%14Set piece: 4 shots (20%)20%420SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 10% of shots200.160.08
Pass into the box / short pass100.060.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.100.10
Settled attack 70% of shots1411.470.11
Cross300.310.10
Cut-back100.070.07
Pass into the box / short pass510.820.16
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)500.270.05
Set piece 20% of shots400.380.10
Corner300.350.12
Free kick100.030.03

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Vanderson30.850
Flávio Nazinho10.150
Aleksandr Golovin20.100
Denis Zakaria10.060
Jordan Teze10.041

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Paris Brunner30.860
Vanderson40.380
Matthis Abline30.240
Aleksandr Golovin30.140
Flávio Nazinho10.130
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Monaco's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.5 of 2.0 xG, 14 of 20 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 2 of the 20 shots (10%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 4 of the 20 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 2.0 xG (-1.0).

Lille

The question
Where do Lille's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

4shots
0.5xG
0.13xG per shot
1big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Attacking transition: 2 shots (50%)50%2Settled attack: 2 shots (50%)50%24SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 50% of shots210.390.19
Pass into the box / short pass110.300.30
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.090.09
Settled attack 50% of shots200.130.07
Pass into the box / short pass100.030.03
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)100.100.10

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Soriba Diaoune10.301
Ngal'ayel Mukau10.030

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Ethan Mbappé10.301
Maurits Kjærgaard10.100
Nathan Ngoy10.090
Nabil Bentaleb10.030
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Lille's chances, by xG, is attacking transition (0.4 of 0.5 xG, 2 of 4 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 2 of the 4 shots (50%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 0 of the 4 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 0.5 xG (+0.5).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Monaco

The question
How does Monaco deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

22 crosses: 10 found a team-mate (45%), 4 led to a shot (18%). 6 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (33%), 1 led to a shot (17%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Lille

Nothing to show here for Lille in this match.

Crosses by Territory

Monaco

The question
Which part of the final third does Monaco actually cross from?

22 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 1 crosses (5%)5%1deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (5%)5%1advanced right wing: 9 crosses (41%)41%9advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 4 crosses (18%)18%4byline right wing: 2 crosses (9%)9%2byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 5 crosses (23%)23%5
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing941%2
byline · left wing523%1
advanced · left wing418%0
byline · right wing29%1
deep · right wing15%0
deep · left wing15%0

Lille

The question
Which part of the final third does Lille actually cross from?

4 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 2 crosses (50%)50%2byline right wing: 1 crosses (25%)25%1byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 1 crosses (25%)25%1
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · left wing250%0
byline · right wing125%0
byline · left wing125%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+2.20Monaco on-ball value
+1.30Lille on-ball value
+0.0+1.1+2.2HALF TIME+2.20+1.300′15′30′45′60′75′90′
MonacoLilleEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Monaco — where the value came from
Passes655 actions+1.55
Carries159 actions+0.02
Dribbles15 actions-0.02
Shots20 actions+0.43
Ball wins75 actions+0.21
Lille — where the value came from
Passes387 actions+0.63
Carries71 actions+0.02
Dribbles13 actions-0.05
Shots4 actions+0.41
Ball wins61 actions+0.29
Monaco — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Vanderson105+0.863
Aleksandr Golovin65+0.460
Matthis Abline13+0.216
Flávio Nazinho102+0.172
Sadibou Sané143+0.154
Paris Brunner (lowest)30-0.069
Lille — most on-ball value (OBV)
PlayerActionsOBV
Berke Özer52+0.324
Nathan Ngoy53+0.312
Ethan Mbappé30+0.159
Soriba Diaoune38+0.158
Nabil Bentaleb48+0.112
Hákon Haraldsson (lowest)30-0.032
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Monaco

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

6 of 31 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%6/31Vanderson2 of 32 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%2/32Vanderson3 of 58 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%3/58Hrádecky1 of 22 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%1/22Nazinho10 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.9 of 62 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%9/62Vanderson5 of 70 pass attempts lost here (7%).7%5/70Coulibaly6 of 63 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%6/63Brunner5 of 63 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%5/63Nazinho7 of 51 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%7/51Nazinho15 of 54 pass attempts lost here (28%).28%15/54Vanderson6 of 32 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%6/32Sané5 of 22 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%5/22Brunner12 of 38 pass attempts lost here (32%).32%12/38Diop10 of 47 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%10/47Detourbetattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
48
Failed forward pass
37
Failed take-on
9
Lost in the defensive third
14
Their weakest zone is the left half-space in the attacking third: 32% of 38 pass attempts there are lost (12 times). Separately, 51% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Lille

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

10 of 16 pass attempts lost here (62%).62%10/16Ngoy3 of 21 pass attempts lost here (14%).14%3/21Özer28 of 71 pass attempts lost here (39%).39%28/71Özer2 of 21 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%2/21Alexsandro11 of 36 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%11/36Perraud7 of 34 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%7/34Mukau2 of 19 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%2/19Haraldsson5 of 32 pass attempts lost here (16%).16%5/32Bentaleb3 of 27 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%3/27Alexsandro12 of 54 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%12/54Perraud7 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.8 of 32 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%8/32Bentalebattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
13
Failed forward pass
12
Failed take-on
9
Lost in the defensive third
54
Their weakest zone is the right wing in the defensive third: 62% of 16 pass attempts there are lost (10 times). Separately, 14% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

PressingPressing BehaviourHow long they keep it — passes and sec...Winning the ballDefensive Action MapBall-Win MapDefending the boxVulnerability Map
Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Monaco

Not just press intensity, but where the 147 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
26%
Middle third
44%
Own third
31%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.4 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 26% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 44% in midfield.

Where they win it back

139117517114131991557DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

Lille

Not just press intensity, but where the 163 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
9%
Middle third
24%
Own third
67%
By intensity this is an moderate press: 10.8 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 9% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 24% in midfield.

Where they win it back

131955121010910DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Monaco

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Monaco win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 44 opposition possessions that Monaco ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
3.2passes
median 2 · before Monaco win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
8sec
median 4s · 44.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
55%
27%
16%
2%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.4
15s
15–30′
3.1
9s
30–45+′
4.4
13s
45–60′
2.5
5s
60–75′
3.2
5s
75–90+′
2.8
6s
average passesaverage seconds

Lille

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Lille win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 26 opposition possessions that Lille ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
6.7passes
median 3 · before Lille win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
18sec
median 8s · 26.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
42%
19%
12%
27%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
4.9
13s
15–30′
10.4
30s
30–45+′
2.3
6s
45–60′

too few
60–75′

too few
75–90+′
4.2
11s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Monaco — 147 actions, 113 won
Lille — 163 actions, 133 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Monaco — 80 wins · 9% in the final third, 49% midfield, 42% own third
own third, right: 12 of 80 wins (15%)15%12 winsown third, centre: 13 of 80 wins (16%)16%13 winsown third, left: 9 of 80 wins (11%)11%9 winsmidfield, right: 15 of 80 wins (19%)19%15 winsmidfield, centre: 6 of 80 wins (8%)8%6 winsmidfield, left: 18 of 80 wins (22%)22%18 winsfinal third, right: 2 of 80 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, centre: 3 of 80 wins (4%)4%3 winsfinal third, left: 2 of 80 wins (2%)2%2 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Aleksandr Golovintackle54′88
Denis Zakariaball-recovery25′78
Mathys Detourbetball-recovery56′73
Denis Zakariaball-recovery8′72
Edan Diopball-recovery57′69
Lille — 104 wins · 5% in the final third, 21% midfield, 74% own third
own third, right: 20 of 104 wins (19%)19%20 winsown third, centre: 45 of 104 wins (43%)43%45 winsown third, left: 12 of 104 wins (12%)12%12 winsmidfield, right: 9 of 104 wins (9%)9%9 winsmidfield, centre: 3 of 104 wins (3%)3%3 winsmidfield, left: 10 of 104 wins (10%)10%10 winsfinal third, right: 2 of 104 wins (2%)2%2 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 104 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 2 of 104 wins (2%)2%2 wins
Highest winsTypeMinx
Nathan Ngoyball-recovery44′83
Benjamin Andréball-recovery3′73
Ngal'ayel Mukautackle23′72
Soriba Diaouneball-recovery23′70
Nathan Ngoyinterception44′70
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Monaco

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Monaco? 22 opponent progressive passes and 4 shots faced (0.5 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Monaco)

Right wing
25%
Right half-space
20%
Central
19%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
26%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (26% of the danger conceded).

Lille

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Lille? 62 opponent progressive passes and 20 shots faced (2.0 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Lille)

Right wing
28%
Right half-space
20%
Central
8%
Left half-space
10%
Left wing
34%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (34% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each thirdAgainst their own normDecision Quality

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Monaco

Build-up (own third)

safer, right-sided, circulating

right 35% · centre 48% · left 17%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
199
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.3 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
23%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
12%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.2 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
67% of 55
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
38%
Progression (middle third)

safer, less recycling

right 35% · centre 30% · left 34%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
389
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
9%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
52% of 81
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
42%
Final third

safer, kept on the floor, playing short

right 39% · centre 16% · left 45%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
241
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
16%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
8%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
31% of 54
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
50%

Lille

Build-up (own third)

safer, left-sided, attacking the next line

right 20% · centre 48% · left 31%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
188
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+15.1 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
12%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
30%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
37% of 79
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
61%
Progression (middle third)

safer, touchline to touchline, played in the channels

right 32% · centre 24% · left 45%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
215
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.8 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
19%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.5 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
33% of 58
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
53%
Final third

safer, left-sided, touchline to touchline

right 26% · centre 7% · left 66%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
68
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.0 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
14%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
11% of 28
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
54%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Monaco
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Threat from passing9.29vs 5.42
Expected goals2.01vs 0.96
Field tilt76%vs 48%
Progressive carries76vs 53
PPDA3.4vs 6.0
Lille
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Pass accuracy75%vs 85%
Progressive passes22vs 44
Threat from passing2.68vs 6.22
Expected goals0.52vs 1.18
Progressive carries20vs 50

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Monaco

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
13%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
50%
Safe / backward
35%
15% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 85% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Lille

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
10%
Progressive
0%
Neutral / sideways
55%
Safe / backward
35%
10% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 90% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Who stood out — the most valuable play...Every player — the full numbers

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Monaco: 6 corners, 3 led to a shot; Lille: 1 corner, 0 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Monaco

6Corners
3Led to a shot
8Free kicks, their half
4Set-piece shots
0.38Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
17%17%50%17%3 from the left flag3 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Lille

1Corners
0Led to a shot
6Free kicks, their half
0Set-piece shots
0.00Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
100%1 corner1 from the left flag0 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Monaco
Lille

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report