Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Strasbourg above the line, Monaco below.
xG race
Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places. Switch to xGOT (xG on target) to count only the shots that tested the goalkeeper, valued by where they went in the goal mouth, or Both to see the two together.
Show
StrasbourgMonacosolid = xG25 shots — click any dot
Shot map
Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.
Strasbourg
Monaco
Goal sequences
The move behind each goal, from the moment Strasbourg or Monaco got the ball to the finish. Pick a goal, then step through it or press Play: numbered circles are passes and touches, dotted lines are carries (the ball travelling with a player), dashed grey is a pass that was lost, the star is the shot.
PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 2 of 2 goals traced.
In possession
In possession
How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.
When Strasbourg has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?
The share of Strasbourg's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen. A phase is where the ball is on the pitch (own third, middle third, final third); a transition or a set piece skips the build-up and is counted on its own.
Phase
Share of the time
Build-up
29.6%
Progression
38.9%
Chance creation
31.0%
Attacking transition
0.5%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Strasbourg spends most of its time on the ball (39% of its time on the ball).
Monaco
The question
When Monaco has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?
The share of Monaco's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen. A phase is where the ball is on the pitch (own third, middle third, final third); a transition or a set piece skips the build-up and is counted on its own.
Phase
Share of the time
Build-up
11.6%
Progression
64.0%
Chance creation
21.4%
Attacking transition
2.9%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Monaco spends most of its time on the ball (64% of its time on the ball).
Passing Network
Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links. Lines are this match's passes between two players, thicker for more.
Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed). Eight families per team — click any map to open it wide, then filter by channel or third, from one to another (or click a cell of the flow grids), by outcome, half, minute and passer. Channels: right wing, right half-space, centre, left half-space, left wing.
From channel
To channel
From third
To third
Outcome · half
Minutes
Channel to channel · click a cell
Third to third · click a cell
Touch Density
Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.
Strasbourg — 609 touches
Monaco — 769 touches
Which Zones Do They Attack Through?
Strasbourg
The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Strasbourg actually do its on-ball work?
Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other. Each is binned into the 15 pitch zones (three thirds × five vertical lanes) and shaded by its share of that kind of action; the arrows are the real actions.
Passes
the ball moved by a pass
467
ACTIONS
Carries
the ball moved with a player
119
ACTIONS
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (11.6% of all actions). 62% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 38% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 34% defensive, 41% middle, 25% attacking.
Monaco
The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Monaco actually do its on-ball work?
Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other. Each is binned into the 15 pitch zones (three thirds × five vertical lanes) and shaded by its share of that kind of action; the arrows are the real actions.
Passes
the ball moved by a pass
601
ACTIONS
Carries
the ball moved with a player
141
ACTIONS
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (15.0% of all actions). 62% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 38% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 17% defensive, 60% middle, 23% attacking.
Attack sides
Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right. Strasbourg leaned on their left (43%); Monaco leaned on their left (40%).
Strasbourg
L
43%27%30%
R
Monaco
L
40%26%34%
R
Final-third entries
Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.
Strasbourg — 41 entries, 32% through the left wing
Monaco — 61 entries, 41% through the right wing
Build-up1 section
Build-Up — the pass map
Strasbourg
The football question
How does Strasbourg progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?
Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central. Each gets its own panel below, so nothing competes for attention. Arrow width = volume, labelled with the exact count; hover for the top passer.
160build-up passes attempted
80%completed
23%reach the middle third
2%go long into the final third
Pass types
33CB · 26%
9Long Wide · 7%
74Wide → FB · 58%
12Central · 9%
Sequence success — build-up
28build-up sequences in this match
11%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
43%turned over with nothing to show
CB33 · 26%
Long Wide9 · 7%
Wide → FB74 · 58%
Central12 · 9%
◆ Vision AI Insight
Strasbourg build predominantly down the left, with Jörgensen as the fulcrum (28 build-up passes). Only 26% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (14×).
Monaco
The football question
How does Monaco progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?
Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central. Each gets its own panel below, so nothing competes for attention. Arrow width = volume, labelled with the exact count; hover for the top passer.
97build-up passes attempted
84%completed
36%reach the middle third
1%go long into the final third
Pass types
35CB · 43%
3Long Wide · 4%
37Wide → FB · 46%
6Central · 7%
Sequence success — build-up
24build-up sequences in this match
17%succeed — reach the next third or a shot
33%turned over with nothing to show
CB35 · 43%
Long Wide3 · 4%
Wide → FB37 · 46%
Central6 · 7%
◆ Vision AI Insight
Monaco build predominantly down the left, with Hrádecky as the fulcrum (21 build-up passes). Only 37% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (10×).
Progression1 section
How They Progress — the mechanism
Strasbourg
Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 34 progressive passes across 1 match (34.0/game).
Origin lane
Right wing
15%
Right half-space
9%
Central
29%
Left half-space
18%
Left wing
29%
Progression is left-dominant: 24% right side · 29% central · 47% left.
Who generates it
Sebastian Nanasi
7 · 21%
Filip Jörgensen
6 · 18%
Oso
5 · 15%
Diogo Sousa
4 · 12%
Genesis Antwi
3 · 9%
Top two — Sebastian Nanasi & Filip Jörgensen — account for 38% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
34.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
38% reach final third
24% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 62% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it.38% of progressive passes reached the final third and 24% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 38% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.
Which lanes actually create the threat
Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.
Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacesterile
Centralefficient
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingbalanced
Monaco
Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 54 progressive passes across 1 match (54.0/game).
Origin lane
Right wing
41%
Right half-space
15%
Central
6%
Left half-space
7%
Left wing
31%
Progression is right-dominant: 56% right side · 6% central · 39% left.
Who generates it
Vanderson
14 · 26%
Aleksandr Golovin
7 · 13%
Flávio Nazinho
6 · 11%
Stanis Idumbo
4 · 7%
Mathys Detourbet
4 · 7%
Top two — Vanderson & Aleksandr Golovin — account for 39% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
54.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
28% reach final third
22% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 72% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it.28% of progressive passes reached the final third and 22% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 39% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.
Which lanes actually create the threat
Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.
Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralsterile
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient
Chance creation4 sections
Chance creation — how the shots come
Strasbourg
The question
Where do Strasbourg's chances actually come from?
Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece. Then by how it was set up: a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box, or no pass at all (the player created it himself). So a cut-back from an attacking transition is counted apart from a cut-back in a settled attack.
13shots
0.8xG
0.06xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set up
Shots
Goals
xG
xG / shot
Attacking transition23% of shots
3
0
0.30
0.10
Cut-back
1
0
0.12
0.12
Pass into the box / short pass
2
0
0.18
0.09
Settled attack62% of shots
8
0
0.44
0.05
Cut-back
3
0
0.20
0.07
Pass into the box / short pass
2
0
0.09
0.04
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)
3
0
0.15
0.05
Set piece15% of shots
2
0
0.05
0.03
Corner
1
0
0.03
0.03
Free kick
1
0
0.03
0.03
Every attempt to create — and what came of it
Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.
Who sets the shots up
Player
Set-ups
xG created
Goals
Diogo Sousa
2
0.20
0
Gessime Yassine
2
0.12
0
Jacobo Ortega
1
0.10
0
Dário Essugo
1
0.09
0
Giovanni Reyna
1
0.05
0
Who takes them
Player
Shots
xG
Goals
Oso
4
0.22
0
Sebastian Nanasi
2
0.18
0
Gessime Yassine
2
0.17
0
Jacobo Ortega
1
0.08
0
Pape Diop
2
0.05
0
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Strasbourg's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.4 of 0.8 xG, 8 of 13 shots), mostly cut-back. 3 of the 13 shots (23%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 13 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 0.8 xG (-0.8).
Monaco
The question
Where do Monaco's chances actually come from?
Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece. Then by how it was set up: a cross, a cut-back, a long ball, a pass into the box, or no pass at all (the player created it himself). So a cut-back from an attacking transition is counted apart from a cut-back in a settled attack.
12shots
0.9xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set up
Shots
Goals
xG
xG / shot
Attacking transition25% of shots
3
1
0.18
0.06
Cut-back
1
0
0.11
0.11
Pass into the box / short pass
2
1
0.07
0.03
Settled attack42% of shots
5
0
0.41
0.08
Cross
1
0
0.13
0.13
Cut-back
1
0
0.10
0.10
Pass into the box / short pass
2
0
0.12
0.06
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)
1
0
0.06
0.06
Set piece33% of shots
4
0
0.27
0.07
Corner
4
0
0.27
0.07
Every attempt to create — and what came of it
Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.
Who sets the shots up
Player
Set-ups
xG created
Goals
Paris Brunner
2
0.14
0
Vanderson
1
0.13
0
Stanis Idumbo
1
0.11
0
Matthis Abline
1
0.08
0
Aleksandr Golovin
1
0.03
0
Who takes them
Player
Shots
xG
Goals
Paris Brunner
3
0.25
1
Eric Dier
2
0.17
0
Lamine Camara
1
0.11
0
Anis Soubeir
1
0.10
0
Denis Zakaria
2
0.09
0
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Monaco's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.4 of 0.9 xG, 5 of 12 shots), mostly cross. 3 of the 12 shots (25%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 4 of the 12 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 0.9 xG (+0.1).
Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide
Strasbourg
The question
How does Strasbourg deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?
9 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (44%), 0 led to a shot (0%). 5 cut-backs: 4 found a team-mate (80%), 3 led to a shot (60%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back. Grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball.
Monaco
The question
How does Monaco deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?
13 crosses: 5 found a team-mate (38%), 1 led to a shot (8%). 7 cut-backs: 3 found a team-mate (43%), 2 led to a shot (29%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back. Grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball.
Crosses by Territory
Strasbourg
The question
Which part of the final third does Strasbourg actually cross from?
9 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline. 33% come from one territory, the advanced right wing; 1 come from the half-spaces and 0 from the centre.
Territory
Crosses
Share
Led to a shot
advanced · right wing
3
33%
0
byline · left wing
3
33%
0
byline · right wing
2
22%
0
advanced · left half-space
1
11%
0
Monaco
The question
Which part of the final third does Monaco actually cross from?
13 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline. 54% come from one territory, the advanced right wing; 0 come from the half-spaces and 0 from the centre.
Territory
Crosses
Share
Led to a shot
advanced · right wing
7
54%
1
byline · right wing
4
31%
0
deep · left wing
1
8%
0
byline · left wing
1
8%
0
On-Ball Value — who moved the game
Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds. A forward pass into space is positive, a lost ball in a dangerous spot is negative. The chart adds the values up as the match goes on.
+1.35Strasbourg on-ball value
+1.89Monaco on-ball value
StrasbourgMonacoEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Strasbourg — where the value came from
Passes467 actions+0.49
Carries119 actions+0.11
Dribbles15 actions-0.22
Shots13 actions+0.37
Ball wins71 actions+0.61
Monaco — where the value came from
Passes601 actions+1.08
Carries141 actions-0.05
Dribbles23 actions+0.09
Shots12 actions+0.35
Ball wins75 actions+0.43
Strasbourg — most on-ball value (OBV)
Player
Actions
OBV
Gessime Yassine
75
+0.311
Sebastian Nanasi
52
+0.309
Oso
86
+0.277
Pape Diop
75
+0.215
Diogo Sousa
25
+0.166
Giovanni Reyna (lowest)
52
-0.200
Monaco — most on-ball value (OBV)
Player
Actions
OBV
Vanderson
105
+0.376
Eric Dier
125
+0.302
Aleksandr Golovin
62
+0.222
Matthis Abline
35
+0.203
Paris Brunner
25
+0.198
Anis Soubeir (lowest)
15
-0.018
When they lose it1 section
Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die
Strasbourg
Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier. Grey cells are real zones with too few attempts to trust a rate.
Loss rate by zone
How they lose it
Incomplete pass — attacking third
24
Failed forward pass
16
Failed take-on
9
Lost in the defensive third
32
Their weakest zone is the central in the attacking third: 40% of 15 pass attempts there are lost (6 times). Separately, 29% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Monaco
Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier. Grey cells are real zones with too few attempts to trust a rate.
Loss rate by zone
How they lose it
Incomplete pass — attacking third
32
Failed forward pass
16
Failed take-on
7
Lost in the defensive third
16
Their weakest zone is the left half-space in the attacking third: 45% of 20 pass attempts there are lost (9 times). Separately, 47% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession
Out of possession
How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.
Not just press intensity, but where the 152 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.
Where defensive actions happen
Attacking third
14%
Middle third
34%
Own third
52%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 7.0 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 14% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 34% in midfield.
Where they win it back
Darker = more defensive actions.
Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came evenly across the width.
Monaco
Not just press intensity, but where the 153 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.
Where defensive actions happen
Attacking third
15%
Middle third
38%
Own third
47%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 5.0 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 15% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 38% in midfield.
Where they win it back
Darker = more defensive actions.
Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.
How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won
Strasbourg
The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Strasbourg win it back with a defensive action?
Counted over the 39 opposition possessions that Strasbourg ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge. Fewer passes and seconds means the ball is won quickly (a press); more means the opponent is allowed to play before Strasbourg step in. Strasbourg win it after 4.1 opponent passes in the first half-hour and after 7.9 after the hour mark (later).
PASSES THEY GET
6.0passes
median 4 · before Strasbourg win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
18sec
median 10s · 39.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
41%
23%
13%
23%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
2.1
4s
15–30′
6.3
20s
30–45+′
8.0
21s
45–60′
2.0
2s
60–75′
10.6
33s
75–90+′
5.8
20s
average passesaverage seconds
Monaco
The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Monaco win it back with a defensive action?
Counted over the 39 opposition possessions that Monaco ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge. Fewer passes and seconds means the ball is won quickly (a press); more means the opponent is allowed to play before Monaco step in. Monaco win it after 4.5 opponent passes in the first half-hour and after 2.8 after the hour mark (sooner).
PASSES THEY GET
4.6passes
median 3 · before Monaco win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
14sec
median 6s · 39.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
44%
33%
13%
10%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
3.9
9s
15–30′
5.1
18s
30–45+′
5.0
15s
45–60′
13.2
42s
60–75′
3.0
9s
75–90+′
2.7
6s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections
Defensive Action Map
Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap a dot for the detail.
Strasbourg — 152 actions, 120 won
Monaco — 153 actions, 121 won
Ball-Win Map
Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.
Strasbourg — 93 wins · 9% in the final third, 28% midfield, 63% own third
Highest wins
Type
Min
x
Oso
ball-recovery
33′
94
Giovanni Reyna
tackle
56′
83
Jacobo Ortega
ball-recovery
11′
76
Giovanni Reyna
tackle
56′
72
Giovanni Reyna
ball-recovery
75′
70
Monaco — 98 wins · 8% in the final third, 37% midfield, 55% own third
Highest wins
Type
Min
x
Flávio Nazinho
tackle
23′
97
Matthis Abline
ball-recovery
91′
93
Vanderson
interception
18′
70
Stanis Idumbo
tackle
28′
69
Vanderson
interception
24′
69
Defending the box1 section
Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them
Strasbourg
The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Strasbourg? 54 opponent progressive passes and 12 shots faced (0.9 xG against) in this match.
Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Strasbourg)
Right wing
45%
Right half-space
13%
Central
9%
Left half-space
5%
Left wing
29%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (45% of the danger conceded).
Monaco
The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Monaco? 34 opponent progressive passes and 13 shots faced (0.8 xG against) in this match.
Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Monaco)
Right wing
16%
Right half-space
5%
Central
33%
Left half-space
19%
Left wing
27%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the central (33% of the danger conceded).
Context
Shape and tactics
How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.
How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next. The numbers use every pass, carry and take-on and follow each possession in order; the one-line verdict compares the passing with the league. Tap ? for what a number means.
Strasbourg
Build-up (own third)
safer, played in the channels, touchline to touchline
right 27% · centre 40% · left 32% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.201
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+9.6 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.19%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.16%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.3.0 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).63% of 60
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.45%
Progression (middle third)
safer, slower, left-sided
right 32% · centre 24% · left 44% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.243
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+2.5 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.21%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.10%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.5 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).36% of 61
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.54%
Final third
safer, shorter passing, playing short
right 34% · centre 18% · left 47% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.157
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+1.1 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.21%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.6%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.4 s
Possessions ending in a shot?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).38% of 32
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.47%
Monaco
Build-up (own third)
safer, slower
right 27% · centre 49% · left 23% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.128
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+9.3 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.22%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.15%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.8 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).63% of 51
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.37%
Progression (middle third)
safer, playing short, left-sided
right 28% · centre 32% · left 41% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.458
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.+3.7 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.18%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.8%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.4 s
Possessions that went on?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).46% of 67
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.48%
Final third
safer, more recycling, circulating
right 51% · centre 15% · left 34% ?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.
Actions?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.179
Forward metres per action?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.-0.6 m
Carries?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.19%
Long passes (30 m+)?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.12%
Seconds between actions?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.2.5 s
Possessions ending in a shot?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).27% of 41
Possessions lost here?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.54%
Against their own norm
The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.
Strasbourg
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Defensive actions152vs 141
Progressive carries40vs 47
Expected goals0.80vs 1.28
Pass accuracy82%vs 84%
Final-third entries41vs 35
Monaco
compared with their other 7 matches this season
Pass accuracy89%vs 85%
Progressive carries69vs 54
Expected goals0.86vs 1.13
Defensive actions153vs 160
Final-third entries61vs 51
Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal
Strasbourg
A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.
Excellent (high xT gain)
13%
Progressive
0%
Neutral / sideways
49%
Safe / backward
38%
13% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 87% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Monaco
A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.
Excellent (high xT gain)
11%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
48%
Safe / backward
38%
13% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 87% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads
Players
Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.
Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Strasbourg: 2 corners, 0 led to a shot; Monaco: 7 corners, 2 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.
Strasbourg
2Corners
0Led to a shot
3Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.05Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
Click an arrow to pick out one corner.
Monaco
7Corners
2Led to a shot
1Free kicks, their half
4Set-piece shots
0.27Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
Corner outcome
Taken by
Click an arrow to pick out one corner.
goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick
Who stood out — the most valuable players
Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.
Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Strasbourg
Monaco
Every player — the full numbers
Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.
Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
