Vision AI‹ All matches
Match reportLaLiga 2026-10-17

Espanyol v Atletico

0.611.29expected goals
0.891.58xG on target (xGOT)

The scoreline tracks the chances (0.61 – 1.29 xG).

AI Tactical Analyst
Espanyol
Atletico
Possession (share of passes)
30.2%69.8%
Duels
5047
Duels won
36.0%63.8%
Aerial duels
3131
Aerial duels won
1021
Successful dribbles
58
Passes
306707
Show
Overview

The match

What happened, and how the game flowed.

Momentum

Who was pushing forward, in 3-minute windows — field position, share of the ball and any shots on the clock, combined. Espanyol above the line, Atletico below.

0'15'30'45'60'75'90'

xG race

Expected goals accumulating minute by minute — every dot is a shot, sized by its own xG. Click a shot here or on the shot map below to find the same one in both places.

Show
0.601.211.81Lee Kang-In — miss, 0.09 xGJonathan David — miss, 0.19 xGGiuliano Simeone — miss, 0.03 xGLee Kang-In — save, 0.04 xGDávid Hancko — save, 0.06 xGDávid Hancko — save, 0.03 xGMorten Hjulmand — miss, 0.06 xGRoberto Fernández — miss, 0.10 xGDani Martinez — miss, 0.07 xGJonathan David — save, 0.09 xGAdemola Lookman — miss, 0.05 xGPol Lozano — miss, 0.04 xGLeandro Cabrera — post, 0.04 xGRoberto Fernández — miss, 0.05 xGJavi Hernández — save, 0.04 xGMarcos Llorente — save, 0.05 xGÁlex Baena — save, 0.03 xGLeandro Cabrera — save, 0.09 xGMorten Hjulmand — save, 0.04 xGBryan Zaragoza — miss, 0.08 xGJonathan David — save, 0.17 xGJulián Alvarez — save, 0.04 xGMorten Hjulmand — miss, 0.03 xGGabriel Moscardo — save, 0.09 xGJulián Alvarez — miss, 0.12 xGÁlex Baena — goal, 0.07 xGJulián Alvarez — miss, 0.05 xGPol Lozano — save, 0.04 xGPol Lozano — save, 0.03 xG0.611.29Lee Kang-In — save, 0.32 xGOTDávid Hancko — save, 0.06 xGOTDávid Hancko — save, 0.07 xGOTJonathan David — save, 0.32 xGOTJavi Hernández — save, 0.08 xGOTMarcos Llorente — save, 0.07 xGOTÁlex Baena — save, 0.05 xGOTLeandro Cabrera — save, 0.16 xGOTMorten Hjulmand — save, 0.03 xGOTJonathan David — save, 0.33 xGOTJulián Alvarez — save, 0.13 xGOTGabriel Moscardo — save, 0.27 xGOTÁlex Baena — goal, 0.19 xGOTPol Lozano — save, 0.36 xGOTPol Lozano — save, 0.02 xGOT0.891.580'15'30'45'60'75'90'
EspanyolAtleticosolid = xG29 shots — click any dot

Shot map

Every shot, one pitch per side. Circle size is xG, the line is where it went in the goal mouth. Filter by outcome; hover or tap a shot for the player, minute and xG.

Espanyol
Atletico

Goal sequences

The move behind each goal, from the moment Espanyol or Atletico got the ball to the finish.

PremiumEvery other possession sequence of this match, build-ups and chances that did not end in a goal, is for subscribers.Subscribe
Each goal's possession, rebuilt from the raw event feed — 1 of 1 goals traced.
In possession

In possession

How they kept the ball, built up, progressed, created and finished, and where their attacks died.

Keeping the ball6 sections

Where the time goes — how long each phase lasts

Espanyol

The question
When Espanyol has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Espanyol's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 36.3% of the time on the ball36%Progression: 38.8% of the time on the ball39%Chance creation: 21.7% of the time on the ball22%Attacking transition: 3.2% of the time on the ball39%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up36.3%
Progression38.8%
Chance creation21.7%
Attacking transition3.2%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Espanyol spends most of its time on the ball (39% of its time on the ball).

Atletico

The question
When Atletico has the ball, how much of that time is spent building, progressing and creating?

The share of Atletico's time on the ball spent in each phase of play, in the order the phases happen.

Build-up: 24.3% of the time on the ball24%Progression: 49.3% of the time on the ball49%Chance creation: 24.3% of the time on the ball24%Attacking transition: 2.1% of the time on the ball49%PROGRESSION
PhaseShare of the time
Build-up24.3%
Progression49.3%
Chance creation24.3%
Attacking transition2.1%
Vision AI Model Insight
Progression is where Atletico spends most of its time on the ball (49% of its time on the ball).

Passing Network

Each dot is a player at his average touch position, sized by touches. It shows the starting eleven; add the substitutes with the chip. Click a player to draw his heatmap on the same pitch and light up his passing links.

Espanyol
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute
Atletico
PlayersLinks
GKDEFMIDFWD11 starters · solid = started, dashed = substitute

Pass Explorer

Every pass of the match as an arrow, each side attacking left to right (solid = completed, dashed grey = failed).

Touch Density

Where each side had the ball: brighter means more touches.

Espanyol — 430 touches
Atletico — 844 touches

Which Zones Do They Attack Through?

Espanyol

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Espanyol actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
306
ACTIONS
4%7%21%7%6%8%6%11%8%5%8%1%2%2%5%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
64
ACTIONS
3%12%5%8%11%11%12%5%11%3%6%3%5%5%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the defensive third (18.4% of all actions). 66% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 34% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 42% defensive, 40% middle, 19% attacking.

Atletico

The question
Across the whole pitch, where does Atletico actually do its on-ball work?

Passes on one map, carries (the ball travelling with a player) on the other.

Passes
the ball moved by a pass
707
ACTIONS
4%7%9%5%3%7%13%13%8%5%10%6%5%3%3%PASSES
Carries
the ball moved with a player
225
ACTIONS
4%4%8%6%1%8%10%20%12%4%11%4%3%2%2%CARRIES
Vision AI Model Insight
Their single busiest zone is the centre of the middle third (14.6% of all actions). 68% of actions run through the inside lanes (centre + both half-spaces) versus 32% down the two wings — an inside-dominant, half-space build. By third: 27% defensive, 47% middle, 26% attacking.

Attack sides

Which channel each side attacked through: the share of every action they made in the opponent's half, down the left, through the middle and down the right.

Espanyol
32%Left side33%Middle35%Right sideATTACKING →
L
32%33%35%
R
Atletico
20%Left side34%Middle46%Right sideATTACKING →
L
20%34%46%
R

Final-third entries

Every completed pass or carry that took the ball from outside the final third into it, by the channel it arrived in (both wings, both half-spaces, the centre). Longer, bolder arrows mean more entries. Dribbles are not counted.

Espanyol — 23 entries, 26% through the left wing
Left wing: 6 entries (26%)626%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 4 entries (17%)417%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 4 entries (17%)417%CENTRERight half-space: 4 entries (17%)417%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 5 entries (22%)522%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Atletico — 76 entries, 33% through the right wing
Left wing: 9 entries (12%)912%LEFT WINGLeft half-space: 9 entries (12%)912%LEFT HALF-SPACECentre: 20 entries (26%)2026%CENTRERight half-space: 13 entries (17%)1317%RIGHT HALF-SPACERight wing: 25 entries (33%)2533%RIGHT WINGATTACKING ↑
Build-up1 section

Build-Up — the pass map

Espanyol

The football question
How does Espanyol progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

136build-up passes attempted
67%completed
22%reach the middle third
6%go long into the final third

Pass types

50CB · 55%
9Long Wide · 10%
3Long Central · 3%
19Wide → FB · 21%
10Central · 11%
CB50 · 55%
left: 26 passes, most from Cabrera26right: 24 passes, most from Riedel24
Long Wide9 · 10%
right: 7 passes, most from Fortuño7left: 2 passes, most from Fortuño2
Long Central3 · 3%
left: 2 passes, most from Fortuño2
Wide → FB19 · 21%
right: 12 passes, most from Fortuño12left: 7 passes, most from Zaragoza7
Central10 · 11%
right: 6 passes, most from Lozano6left: 4 passes, most from Fortuño4
◆ Vision AI Insight
Espanyol build predominantly down the right, with Fortuño as the fulcrum (25 build-up passes). Only 27% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → RHS def (11×).

Atletico

The football question
How does Atletico progress possession from defence into attack — and who runs it?

Build-up passes grouped into 5 real categories — not the old zone grid, not raw individual lines: CB (passer is a centre-back), Wide→FB, Central, Long Wide, Long Central.

195build-up passes attempted
92%completed
30%reach the middle third
0%go long into the final third

Pass types

66CB · 37%
6Long Wide · 3%
1Long Central · 1%
82Wide → FB · 46%
24Central · 13%
CB66 · 37%
right: 34 passes, most from Romero34left: 32 passes, most from Hancko32
Long Wide6 · 3%
left: 3 passes, most from Martinez3right: 3 passes, most from Oblak3
Long Central1 · 1%
Wide → FB82 · 46%
right: 54 passes, most from Hjulmand54left: 28 passes, most from Oblak28
Central24 · 13%
right: 14 passes, most from Pubill14left: 10 passes, most from Oblak10
◆ Vision AI Insight
Atletico build predominantly down the right, with Hancko as the fulcrum (32 build-up passes). Only 30% of their build-up passes actually advance a third — the rest is lateral circulation, the hallmark of a possession-controlling side that circulates patiently in midfield before progressing. Their single most-repeated pattern is C def → LHS def (14×).
Progression1 section

How They Progress — the mechanism

Espanyol

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 36 progressive passes across 1 match (36.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
22%
Right half-space
11%
Central
22%
Left half-space
11%
Left wing
33%
Progression is left-dominant: 33% right side · 22% central · 44% left.

Who generates it

Ángel Fortuño
9 · 25%
Bryan Zaragoza
5 · 14%
Leandro Cabrera
4 · 11%
Vanja Drkusic
3 · 8%
Javi Hernández
2 · 6%
Top two — Ángel Fortuño & Bryan Zaragoza — account for 39% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
36.0 prog passes/game
mostly left
→
PENETRATION
31% reach final third
17% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 69% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 31% of progressive passes reached the final third and 17% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 39% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the left side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingbalanced
Right half-spacesterile
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacesterile
Left wingefficient

Atletico

Not just how many progressive passes, but where they start, who plays them, and whether they actually penetrate. 60 progressive passes across 1 match (60.0/game).

Origin lane

Right wing
37%
Right half-space
23%
Central
12%
Left half-space
18%
Left wing
10%
Progression is right-dominant: 60% right side · 12% central · 28% left.

Who generates it

Cristian Romero
11 · 18%
Marc Pubill
8 · 13%
Lee Kang-In
7 · 12%
Dani Martinez
6 · 10%
Giuliano Simeone
5 · 8%
Top two — Cristian Romero & Marc Pubill — account for 32% of all progression.
PROGRESSION
60.0 prog passes/game
mostly right
→
PENETRATION
25% reach final third
22% reach the box
→
THREAT
the other 75% is recycled
progress ≠ danger
What came of it. 25% of progressive passes reached the final third and 22% the box; the rest was recycled in front of the block. 32% of the progression ran through two players, mostly down the right side.

Which lanes actually create the threat

Share of passes played from each lane against its share of the threat (xT) they add. Efficient = more threat than volume, sterile = lots of the ball, little damage.

Per lane — volume vs threat
Right wingefficient
Right half-spacebalanced
Centralbalanced
Left half-spacebalanced
Left wingsterile
Chance creation4 sections

Chance creation — how the shots come

Espanyol

The question
Where do Espanyol's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

10shots
0.6xG
0.06xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
0goals
Attacking transition: 2 shots (20%)20%2Settled attack: 6 shots (60%)60%6Set piece: 2 shots (20%)20%210SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Attacking transition 20% of shots200.170.09
Pass into the box / short pass200.170.09
Settled attack 60% of shots600.310.05
Cross300.140.05
Pass into the box / short pass100.090.09
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.090.04
Set piece 20% of shots200.130.06
Corner200.130.06

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Cala20.170
Bryan Zaragoza30.140
Edu Expósito10.090

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Roberto Fernández20.150
Leandro Cabrera20.130
Pol Lozano30.110
Gabriel Moscardo10.090
Bryan Zaragoza10.080
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Espanyol's chances, by xG, is settled attack (0.3 of 0.6 xG, 6 of 10 shots), mostly cross. 2 of the 10 shots (20%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 2 of the 10 shots came from set pieces; 0 goals from 0.6 xG (-0.6).

Atletico

The question
Where do Atletico's chances actually come from?

Every shot sorted twice. First by the kind of attack: an attacking transition (the shot came within 15 seconds of winning the ball), a settled attack (open play after the team had the ball), or a set piece.

19shots
1.3xG
0.07xG per shot
0big chances (0.3+ xG)
1goals
Settled attack: 14 shots (74%)74%14Set piece: 5 shots (26%)26%519SHOTS
Kind of attack, then how the shot was set upShotsGoalsxGxG / shot
Settled attack 74% of shots1411.060.08
Cut-back200.290.14
Pass into the box / short pass1010.710.07
Own creation (carry, dribble, rebound)200.070.04
Set piece 26% of shots500.230.05
Corner500.230.05

Every attempt to create — and what came of it

Every pass into the box, every cut-back and every pass before a shot. Red led to a shot, gold to a goal; grey ones were tried but no shot came: solid found a team-mate, dashed lost the ball. Filter by outcome, type or player; tap an arrow for the detail.

Who sets the shots up

PlayerSet-upsxG createdGoals
Giuliano Simeone20.280
Jonathan David30.240
Álex Baena20.220
Lee Kang-In20.120
Julián Alvarez10.071

Who takes them

PlayerShotsxGGoals
Jonathan David30.450
Julián Alvarez30.200
Morten Hjulmand30.130
Lee Kang-In20.130
Álex Baena20.101
Vision AI Model Insight
The biggest source of Atletico's chances, by xG, is settled attack (1.1 of 1.3 xG, 14 of 19 shots), mostly pass into the box / short pass. 0 of the 19 shots (0%) came within 15 seconds of winning the ball. 5 of the 19 shots came from set pieces; 1 goals from 1.3 xG (-0.3).

Crosses & Cutbacks — squad-wide

Espanyol

The question
How does Espanyol deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

7 crosses: 3 found a team-mate (43%), 2 led to a shot (29%). 0 cut-backs: 0 found a team-mate (—), 0 led to a shot (—).

Atletico

The question
How does Atletico deliver into the box from wide areas, and what comes of it?

15 crosses: 4 found a team-mate (27%), 1 led to a shot (7%). 4 cut-backs: 2 found a team-mate (50%), 2 led to a shot (50%). A cross starts wide and is aimed into the box; a cut-back starts near the byline and is squared back.

Crosses by Territory

Espanyol

The question
Which part of the final third does Espanyol actually cross from?

7 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 1 crosses (14%)14%1advanced right wing: 1 crosses (14%)14%1advanced right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left wing: 1 crosses (14%)14%1byline right wing: 3 crosses (43%)43%3byline right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 1 crosses (14%)14%1
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
byline · right wing343%0
deep · left wing114%0
advanced · right wing114%0
advanced · left wing114%1
byline · left wing114%1

Atletico

The question
Which part of the final third does Atletico actually cross from?

15 crosses in this match (the same crosses as the map above), split into fifteen territories — five channels (both wings, both half-spaces and the centre) by three depths from the halfway line to the byline.

deep right wing: 0 crosses (0%)deep right half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep centre: 0 crosses (0%)deep left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)deep left wing: 0 crosses (0%)advanced right wing: 5 crosses (33%)33%5advanced right half-space: 1 crosses (7%)7%1advanced centre: 0 crosses (0%)advanced left half-space: 1 crosses (7%)7%1advanced left wing: 1 crosses (7%)7%1byline right wing: 4 crosses (27%)27%4byline right half-space: 2 crosses (13%)13%2byline centre: 0 crosses (0%)byline left half-space: 0 crosses (0%)byline left wing: 1 crosses (7%)7%1
TerritoryCrossesShareLed to a shot
advanced · right wing533%1
byline · right wing427%0
byline · right half-space213%0
advanced · right half-space17%0
advanced · left half-space17%0
advanced · left wing17%0
byline · left wing17%0

On-Ball Value — who moved the game

Every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win is worth the change it made to the chance of scoring minus the chance of conceding in the next 10 seconds.

+0.95Espanyol on-ball value
+1.44Atletico on-ball value
+0.0+0.7+1.4HALF TIME+0.95+1.440′15′30′45′60′75′90′
EspanyolAtleticoEach step up is an action that raised the team's chance of scoring; a drop is one that lowered it
Espanyol — where the value came from
Passes306 actions+0.65
Carries64 actions+0.04
Dribbles12 actions+0.05
Shots10 actions-0.05
Ball wins56 actions+0.26
Atletico — where the value came from
Passes707 actions+0.78
Carries225 actions+0.03
Dribbles18 actions+0.05
Shots19 actions+0.35
Ball wins63 actions+0.24
Espanyol — most valuable players
PlayerActionsOBV
Bryan Zaragoza26+0.570
Roger Hinojo25+0.226
Leandro Cabrera62+0.140
Gabriel Moscardo8+0.111
Pol Lozano52+0.105
Roberto Fernández (lowest)17-0.309
Atletico — most valuable players
PlayerActionsOBV
Cristian Romero101+0.273
Álex Baena33+0.249
Julián Alvarez54+0.228
Morten Hjulmand131+0.215
Lee Kang-In73+0.199
Alejandro Grimaldo (lowest)34-0.097
When they lose it1 section

Ball-Loss Map — where attacks die

Espanyol

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

11 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.7 of 21 pass attempts lost here (33%).33%7/21Riedel20 of 65 pass attempts lost here (31%).31%20/65Fortuño5 of 22 pass attempts lost here (23%).23%5/22Cabrera7 of 17 pass attempts lost here (41%).41%7/17Cabrera5 of 23 pass attempts lost here (22%).22%5/23Riedel3 of 18 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%3/18Expósito7 of 34 pass attempts lost here (21%).21%7/34Expósito4 of 24 pass attempts lost here (17%).17%4/24Cabrera3 of 16 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%3/16Lozano9 of 24 pass attempts lost here (38%).38%9/24Hilali4 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.6 pass attempts here — too few (min 15) for a reliable rate.3 of 15 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%3/15Expósitoattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
21
Failed forward pass
10
Failed take-on
7
Lost in the defensive third
45
Their weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 41% of 17 pass attempts there are lost (7 times). Separately, 24% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.

Atletico

Every turnover has a location and a cause. This is a rate, not a raw count — the share of pass attempts from each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone they simply play through more often doesn't automatically look riskier.

Loss rate by zone

4 of 31 pass attempts lost here (13%).13%4/31Pubill1 of 46 pass attempts lost here (2%).2%1/46Oblak3 of 66 pass attempts lost here (5%).5%3/66Oblak4 of 32 pass attempts lost here (12%).12%4/32Hancko4 of 20 pass attempts lost here (20%).20%4/20Grimaldo7 of 48 pass attempts lost here (15%).15%7/48Simeone7 of 89 pass attempts lost here (8%).8%7/89Barrios8 of 92 pass attempts lost here (9%).9%8/92Hjulmand6 of 59 pass attempts lost here (10%).10%6/59Barrios2 of 32 pass attempts lost here (6%).6%2/32Lookman8 of 71 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%8/71Kang-In14 of 41 pass attempts lost here (34%).34%14/41Simeone4 of 35 pass attempts lost here (11%).11%4/35Hancko4 of 21 pass attempts lost here (19%).19%4/21Baena6 of 24 pass attempts lost here (25%).25%6/24Martinezattacking →

How they lose it

Incomplete pass — attacking third
36
Failed forward pass
26
Failed take-on
10
Lost in the defensive third
16
Their weakest zone is the right half-space in the attacking third: 34% of 41 pass attempts there are lost (14 times). Separately, 44% of all losses happen in the attacking third — a fair share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Out of possession

Out of possession

How they pressed, where they won the ball, and how the other side got through.

Pressing2 sections

Pressing Behaviour — where it starts

Espanyol

Not just press intensity, but where the 141 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
17%
Middle third
33%
Own third
50%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 7.5 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 17% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 33% in midfield.

Where they win it back

513271411871210105495DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the left.

Atletico

Not just press intensity, but where the 147 defensive actions happen — the trigger height and the side they hunt.

Where defensive actions happen

Attacking third
11%
Middle third
40%
Own third
49%
By intensity this is an aggressive high press: 3.7 opponent passes per defensive action (PPDA; lower = more aggressive). By height, 11% of their defensive actions come in the attacking third, 40% in midfield.

Where they win it back

1392810121216157944DEFENSIVEMIDDLEATTACKINGR wingR half-spcentralL half-spL wingattack

Darker = more defensive actions.

Where they pressed. Their defensive actions came more down the right.

How long they keep it — passes and seconds until the ball is won

Espanyol

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Espanyol win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 31 opposition possessions that Espanyol ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
7.2passes
median 6 · before Espanyol win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
22sec
median 16s · 31.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
19%
29%
26%
26%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′

too few
15–30′
5.8
18s
30–45+′
5.2
12s
45–60′
10.8
45s
60–75′
9.3
26s
75–90+′
5.6
16s
average passesaverage seconds

Atletico

The question
Once the opponent has the ball, how many passes and how many seconds pass before Atletico win it back with a defensive action?

Counted over the 34 opposition possessions that Atletico ended with a tackle, interception, recovery or challenge.

PASSES THEY GET
3.2passes
median 2 · before Atletico win it
TIME THEY KEEP IT
10sec
median 5s · 34.0 wins per game
How many passes the opponent got in before the ball was won
59%
24%
12%
6%
0–2 passes3–5 passes6–9 passes10+ passes
Through the match — every 15 minutes
0–15′
5.5
21s
15–30′
4.4
14s
30–45+′
4.3
15s
45–60′
1.8
4s
60–75′
1.7
2s
75–90+′
2.6
6s
average passesaverage seconds
Winning the ball2 sections

Defensive Action Map

Every tackle, interception, recovery, clearance, block and aerial duel, one pitch per side. Red won the ball or the duel; a grey ring is one that failed: a duel lost, a tackle missed, dribbled past.

Espanyol — 141 actions, 99 won
Atletico — 147 actions, 121 won

Ball-Win Map

Where each side won the ball back, by territory: the pitch cut into thirds and three channels, each zone showing its share of the wins (darker = more). The table lists the five wins highest up the pitch.

Espanyol — 74 wins · 4% in the final third, 24% midfield, 72% own third
own third, right: 12 of 74 wins (16%)16%12 winsown third, centre: 22 of 74 wins (30%)30%22 winsown third, left: 19 of 74 wins (26%)26%19 winsmidfield, right: 8 of 74 wins (11%)11%8 winsmidfield, centre: 6 of 74 wins (8%)8%6 winsmidfield, left: 4 of 74 wins (5%)5%4 winsfinal third, right: 3 of 74 wins (4%)4%3 winsfinal third, centre: 0 of 74 wins (0%)final third, left: 0 of 74 wins (0%)
Highest winsTypeMinx
Pol Lozanoball-recovery37′78
Javi Hernándezball-recovery37′77
Pol Lozanotackle24′69
Pol Lozanointerception37′66
Edu Expósitoball-recovery31′65
Atletico — 81 wins · 6% in the final third, 37% midfield, 57% own third
own third, right: 15 of 81 wins (19%)19%15 winsown third, centre: 20 of 81 wins (25%)25%20 winsown third, left: 11 of 81 wins (14%)14%11 winsmidfield, right: 12 of 81 wins (15%)15%12 winsmidfield, centre: 9 of 81 wins (11%)11%9 winsmidfield, left: 9 of 81 wins (11%)11%9 winsfinal third, right: 3 of 81 wins (4%)4%3 winsfinal third, centre: 1 of 81 wins (1%)1%1 winfinal third, left: 1 of 81 wins (1%)1%1 win
Highest winsTypeMinx
Giuliano Simeoneball-recovery63′69
Rodrigo Mendozaball-recovery70′68
Morten Hjulmandinterception87′67
Marcos Llorentetackle72′67
Álex Baenaball-recovery75′67
Defending the box1 section

Vulnerability Map — how opponents hurt them

Espanyol

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Espanyol? 60 opponent progressive passes and 19 shots faced (1.3 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Espanyol)

Right wing
43%
Right half-space
21%
Central
15%
Left half-space
14%
Left wing
6%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the right wing (43% of the danger conceded).

Atletico

The report flipped: where do opponents create their threat against Atletico? 36 opponent progressive passes and 10 shots faced (0.6 xG against) in this match.

Opponent threat by lane (attacking into Atletico)

Right wing
18%
Right half-space
10%
Central
30%
Left half-space
7%
Left wing
34%
Where the danger came from. Opponents generated most of their threat through the left wing (34% of the danger conceded).
Context

Shape and tactics

How each side set up, and how far from their own norm they played.

Attitude in each third

How each side played in each third: wide or central, direct or patient, quick or slow, and what its possessions did next.

Espanyol

Build-up (own third)

safer, narrow, central, played inside

right 22% · centre 54% · left 25%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
155
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+16.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
12%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
30%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
3.4 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
38% of 64
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
62%
Progression (middle third)

safer

right 35% · centre 35% · left 31%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
153
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+4.5 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
22%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
13%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.7 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
37% of 51
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
55%
Final third

safer, played in the channels, touchline to touchline

right 47% · centre 14% · left 39%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
74
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+2.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
20%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
4%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.6 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
21% of 33
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
45%

Atletico

Build-up (own third)

safer, shorter passing, kept on the floor

right 34% · centre 41% · left 25%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
249
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+6.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
11%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.8 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
78% of 60
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
25%
Progression (middle third)

safer, played inside, narrow, central

right 32% · centre 46% · left 22%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
447
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+3.7 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
27%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
7%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.3 s
Possessions that went on
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
59% of 75
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
48%
Final third

safer, right-sided, kept on the floor

right 56% · centre 23% · left 21%

?Where across the pitch they played in this third: right channel, centre, left channel. Counts every pass, carry and take-on.

Actions
?Every pass, carry and take-on the side started in this third.
254
Forward metres per action
?Average metres the ball moved towards goal with each pass or carry started here. Higher means more direct.
+0.6 m
Carries
?Share of actions here that were carries (running with the ball) instead of passes.
21%
Long passes (30 m+)
?Share of passes from here travelling 30 m or more.
3%
Seconds between actions
?Average seconds between one action and the next in the same possession, for actions in this third. Lower means quicker.
2.2 s
Possessions ending in a shot
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that went on to reach the next third (in the final third: that ended in a shot).
30% of 57
Possessions lost here
?Of the possessions that had the ball in this third, the share that ended with the ball lost in this third.
42%

Against their own norm

The five numbers that departed furthest from each side's own season average — bar right of centre means more than usual, left means less. This is what makes a match unusual rather than merely good or bad.

Espanyol
compared with their other 9 matches this season
Pass accuracy71%vs 79%
Passes306vs 434
Expected goals0.61vs 1.15
Field tilt27%vs 47%
PPDA7.5vs 5.3
Atletico
compared with their other 9 matches this season
Progressive carries95vs 51
Final-third entries76vs 58
PPDA3.7vs 5.0
Passes707vs 615
Pass accuracy88%vs 86%

Decision Quality — not all completed passes are equal

Espanyol

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
14%
Progressive
0%
Neutral / sideways
51%
Safe / backward
35%
14% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 86% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.

Atletico

A 90% pass completion can hide a sideways habit. Grading every pass by the threat it adds separates value creation from safe circulation.

Excellent (high xT gain)
15%
Progressive
2%
Neutral / sideways
46%
Safe / backward
37%
17% of passes are progressive-or-better; the remaining 83% keep possession without advancing it. A control-first side — safe in build-up, reliant on a few players for the incision.
Squads

Players

Who stood out, and every player's numbers. Click a player for his own match report.

Set pieces

Every corner of the match, drawn from the flag to where the delivery landed, and what came of it within ten seconds. Espanyol: 4 corners, 2 led to a shot; Atletico: 12 corners, 4 led to a shot. Stars are direct free kicks at goal.

Espanyol

4Corners
2Led to a shot
5Free kicks, their half
2Set-piece shots
0.13Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
25%1 corner50%25%3 from the left flag1 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

Atletico

12Corners
4Led to a shot
6Free kicks, their half
5Set-piece shots
0.23Set-piece xG
0Set-piece goals
17%2 corners17%2 corners8%1 corner8%8%1 corner25%8%8%3 from the left flag9 from the right flag

Click an arrow to pick out one corner.

goal followedshot followedfirst contact wondelivery lost★ direct free kick

Who stood out — the most valuable players

Ranked by on-ball value: what every pass, carry, take-on, shot and ball win added to the chance of scoring, minus what it gave away. Click a card for that player's full match report.

Player of the match · highest on-ball value
Espanyol
Atletico

Every player — the full numbers

Every player who played. Click a column to sort. The best value in each column is highlighted.

Click any player to open his own match report: every pass, carry, shot and tackle he made in this match.
Vision AI · building report