العربية VISION AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player Intelligence Report · Egyptian Premier League 2025/26

Mahmoud Trézéguet

Al Ahly FC
Half-space creator AM
39% of actions in the half-spaces
attacking midhalf-space creatorcreationbetween the lines
1688
minutes
21 apps
22
key passes
1.17/90
46
progressive passes
2.5/90
21
box entries
1.12/90
64
final-3rd entries
3.4/90
11
goals
10.87 xG
44
dribbles
48% won
80%
pass completion
586 passes
Part 1

Overview

The headline read on him, and how he compares to his peers.
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Left Wing, Attacking third — between the lines — mostly in the attacking third (50% of his 586 passes)
80% completion · 586× in 20/20 matches
TURN / BEAT MAN
face forward in the pocket
48% won · 44× in 15/20 matches
CREATE
through-ball, cut-back, key pass
1.17/90 · 22× in 14/20 matches
FINISH
arrive and shoot from central zones
11 goals · 10.87 xG · 88× in 21/20 matches
Signature: receive between the lines → turn → create or finish. Deny him the pocket in zone 14 and force him to receive facing his own goal.
Part 2

In Possession

What he does with the ball — build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.
02

How does he create chances?

22 key passes (1.17/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
9%5%5%5%18%18%5%14%23%VISION AI
chance creation (22)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
Box deliveries — key passes reaching the final third, by flank
VISION AI
from the left (15)from the right (7)of 22 key passes landing in the final thirdattacking ↑ toward goal
03

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking
Across 162 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he carries through central areas (37%). He carries from outside into the middle 34 times and out toward the touchline 12 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
04

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
21 · 13%
Progressive / key pass
23 · 14%
Simple pass
67 · 41%
No clean link
51 · 31%
Of 162 carries, 13% flow straight into a shot of his own, 14% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 31% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
05

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the left hs to the left wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 10 passes worth 0.89 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 22 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the central in the final third — 6 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the final third: 43% of his 21 touches there are lost (9 times).
3 touches · too few3 touches · too few4 touches · too few22%2/9 lost17%2/12 lost16%4/25 lost27%9/33 lost11%4/35 lost17%13/76 lost23%21/92 lost31%12/39 lost43%9/21 lost25%5/20 lost27%22/82 lost11%15/132 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATTVISION AI
06

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Mahmoud Trézéguet gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (the event feed gives no explicit receiver).

123VISION AI
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking
His collection zones
22%
Primary
Left Wing, Attacking third
16%
Secondary
Left Wing, Middle third
15%
Third
Left Half-Space, Attacking third
These are his primary ball-collection zones — where any plan to involve him (or deny him) has to start.
07

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Mahmoud Trézéguet actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
3204612217566623294263516384123VISION AI
own goal left, attacking · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%3%6%6%4%1%4%5%4%1%1%3%7%20%26%9%VISION AI
own goal left, attacking
08

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

162 tracked carries (8.6/90, 35 progressive, 1580m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

1%1%1%1%2%2%5%3%6%2%1%6%20%36%12%VISION AI
progressivelateral/short% of his 162 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 58m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
34Outside → Inside
60Inside → Inside
56Outside → Outside
12Inside → Outside
VISION AI
First (78)Second (41)Third (34)Fourth (9)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Does he carry to create or drift wide? Dribbles by channel. Season rate: 2.35 dribbles attempted /90.

VISION AI
brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking
INSIDE 52%
OUTSIDE 48%
Dribble location — 23 inside · 21 outside
Right Wing
3 · 7%
Right Half-Space
4 · 9%
Central
4 · 9%
Left Half-Space
15 · 34%
Left Wing
18 · 41%
Vision AI His carries cluster centrally — a central creator.
09

Crosses & Cutbacks

16 crosses (0.85/90, 8 completed) and 25 cutbacks (1.33/90, 12 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event on this data source, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
VISION AI
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
VISION AI
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
10

Can he finish?

88 shots · 10.87 xG · 11 goals (+0.13 vs xG). Mostly right-footed. Circle size = xG.

shots  88
on target  26
goals  11
xG  10.87
xG on target  9.14
xG / shot  0.124
Shot locations — close-up on the box
VISION AI
goalon targetoff/blockedcircle size = xGattacking ↑ toward goal
11

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

46
progressive · 2.5/90
64
final-third entries · 3.4/90
21
box entries · 1.12/90
12
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

Where does he become vulnerable?

141 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

78
attacking third (cheap)
58
middle third
5
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 55% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 1.53 danger-index/90 · 0.204 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
13

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.890.640.380.340.330.30VISION AI
own goal left, attacking
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.89
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
10 passes · 1 to a shot
0.64
Left Half-Space Att third → Left Half-Space Att third
3 passes
0.38
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.34
Left Wing Mid third → Left Wing Att third
4 passes
0.33
Central Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
2 passes
0.30
Left Wing Att third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
14

What is his passing profile?

586
passes attempted
37%
mostly forward
56%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
219 · 37%
Sideways
169 · 29%
Backward
198 · 34%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
260 · 56%
Medium
185 · 40%
Long (>30m)
23 · 5%
15

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, red = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

22Key pass
16Cross
25Cutback
46Progressive
33Long ball
15Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
118Outside → Inside
149Inside → Inside
131Outside → Outside
70Inside → Outside
By direction
219Forward
198Backward
169Sideways
VISION AI
own goal left, attacking
16

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW5155%2837%198%4RHS3944%1731%1226%10C508%414%748%2422%118%4LHS1302%35%727%3533%4332%42LW1982%37%1340%7952%103FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the left wing in the final third → the left half-space in the final third — 16 progressive passes (24% of his progression) at 0.077 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 72% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 7% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 5% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 34 line-breaking passes and 64 final-third entries, 4.1 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%3%6%6%4%1%4%5%4%1%1%3%7%20%26%9%VISION AI
completedincomplete586 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking
586
passes
80%
completed
118
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 80% season completion rate.
Part 3

Out of Possession

Where and how he defends and presses.
17

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Mahmoud Trézéguet keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~6-8 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 11.3, 6m)
0.73
2.2
0.56
40%
Mid press (PPDA 17.1, 6m)
0.98
2.4
1.45
67%
Low press (PPDA 23.5, 8m)
0.90
3.1
1.61
42%
18

How & where does he defend?

81 defensive actions across the season (4.3/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not in the event feed, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

VISION AI
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking
17
tackles · 88% won
10
interceptions · 0.5/90
42
recoveries · 2.2/90
9
clearances · 0.5/90
3
blocks
43
avg action height
16
won high (att 3rd)
35
middle third
30
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 69 proactive ball-wins (3.7/90), tackle success 88%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.

Defensive work in the attacking half

Ball-wins in the attacking half only (own half vs. attacking half, a simple 2-way split, not the usual thirds) — the clearest single signal of how much he presses and recovers the ball high up the pitch.

30
attacking-half actions · 1.60/90
Part 4

Team Context

How much of the team's output runs through him, and what changes when he isn't on the pitch.
19

Impact on the Team

Al Ahly FC's output per match with Mahmoud Trézéguet (21 matches) versus without him (8 matches). A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (21)
WITHOUT (8)
Δ
goals for /match
1.57
2.20
-0.63
xG for /match
1.78
0.00
+1.78
goals against /match
1.05
0.40
+0.65
points /match
1.81
1.88
-0.07
20

His Share of the Team

Of everything Al Ahly FC produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Mahmoud Trézéguet specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
goals
33%
11 / 33
expected goals (xG)
19%
10.9 / 55.8
shots
14%
88 / 611
Part 5

Overview

The headline read on him, and how he compares to his peers.
21

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

VISION AI
own goal left, attacking
29
passes / match
2.9
dribbles / match
18–51
pass range (matches)
1–6
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (18 at the low end, 51 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
Part 6

Recruitment

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary verdict.
22

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 221 attacking mids in the league (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Half-space creator81%Advanced playmaker (8)78%
Why Half-space creator 81%: a weighted blend of creativity 74 (weight 40%) + final-third threat 69 (weight 30%) + box threat 95 (weight 15%) + dribbling 91 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
box threat, retention, dribbling, press resistance
Strong
territory (wide vs central), crossing, receiving zones, line-breaking, creativity, carrying
Average
final-third threat, progression, through-balls, build-up, ball-winning, transition
Weak
defensive aggression, passing directness
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Box threat
95
Retention
93
Dribbling
91
Press resistance ~proxy
87
Territory (wide vs central)
83
Crossing
81
Receiving zones
77
Line-breaking
76
Creativity
74
Carrying
72
Final-third threat
69
Progression
68
Through-balls ~proxy
54
Build-up
51
Ball-winning
48
Transition ~proxy
42
Defensive aggression
27
Passing directness
23
23

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, La Liga and the Egyptian Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Raphinha Barcelona · La Liga
86%
Driven by: box threat (22%), dribbling (10%), press resistance (10%). Different mechanism — Trézéguet more via territory (wide vs central), retention; Raphinha more via defensive aggression, through-balls.
Lee Kang-In Atletico · La Liga
82%
Driven by: press resistance (15%), retention (14%), crossing (12%). Different mechanism — Trézéguet more via box threat, territory (wide vs central); Kang-In more via through-balls, final-third threat.
Rayan Cherki Man City · Premier League
77%
Driven by: press resistance (13%), retention (11%), crossing (11%). Different mechanism — Trézéguet more via territory (wide vs central), box threat; Cherki more via through-balls, progression.
Wilson Odobert Tottenham · Premier League
76%
Driven by: press resistance (18%), dribbling (15%), defensive aggression (13%). Different mechanism — Trézéguet more via box threat; Odobert more via transition, passing directness.
Nasser Maher Pyramids FC
76%
Driven by: retention (18%), box threat (17%), press resistance (15%). Different mechanism — Trézéguet more via territory (wide vs central), carrying; Maher more via passing directness.
Rodrygo Real Madrid · La Liga
74%
Driven by: box threat (17%), retention (12%), crossing (11%). Different mechanism — Trézéguet more via through-balls, line-breaking; Rodrygo more via defensive aggression, transition.
24

Summary

Mahmoud Trézéguet is a half-space creator / advanced playmaker (8): 1.17 key passes /90, 2.5 progressive passes, 11 goals from 10.87 xG. A between-the-lines creator. [Off-ball movement into pockets needs tracking.]

Based on 21 matches (1688 minutes) this season — a reliable read. He profiles as a half-space creator / advanced playmaker (8) — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is final-third threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall half-space creator profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.