العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026
HC

John Egan

Hull City
Stopper centre-back CB
16.9 defensive actions/90 · 1.8 progressive/90 — defends first
Capability Analysis
Aerial & Box Defending43%vs 50 centre-backs
"Can he win the individual defensive battle in his own box?"
Aerial duels won /900.00%
Aerial win rate: 0.0%
Clearances /906.9286%
Ball-Winning37%vs 50 centre-backs
"How actively does he win the ball back?"
Interceptions /900.9746%
Ball recoveries /902.4314%
Tackles /901.4664%
Duels won /901.3424%
Breaking Pressure46%vs 45 centre-backs
"Can he retain and progress the ball while his own team is being pressed?"
Retention under pressure76.0%36%
Progressive passes while pressed624%
Line-breaking passes while pressed247%
Progressive carries while pressed646%
Threat added while pressed (xT)2.39xT78%
Progression3%vs 50 centre-backs
"Can he move the team forward with a pass, not just recycle it sideways?"
Progressive passes /900.970%
Line-breaking passes /900.242%
Threat added by passing /900.38xT0%
Pass accuracy78.12%10%
Ball-Carrying0%vs 50 centre-backs
"Does he advance the ball himself when the pass isn't on?"
Progressive carries /901.940%
Carry distance /9041.59m0%
centre-backstopper centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
741
minutes
8 apps
192
passes
78% completed
78%
pass completion
192 passes
15
progressive passes
1.8/90
30
line-breaking passes
3.6/90
139
defensive actions
16.9/90
20
tackles + interceptions
42% tackle win
57
clearances
6.9/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (51% of his 192 passes)
78% completion · 192× in 8/8 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
1.8 prog/90 · 30× in 7/8 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 13× in 7/8 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
1.1/90 · 9× in 6/8 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Switch Play → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
17

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
24
passes / match
16.9
def actions / 90
18–32
pass range (matches)
57
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (18 at the low end, 32 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

09

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

39 tracked carries (4.7/90, 10 progressive, 342m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

3%10%33%13%5%15%15%3%3%
progressivelateral/short% of his 39 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 7m, longest 21m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
1Outside → Inside
32Inside → Inside
5Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (17)Second (11)Third (11)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

12
tackle duels
5
won
7
beaten · 58%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 75%
OUTSIDE 25%
Tackle-duel location — 9 inside · 3 outside
Right Wing
2 · 17%
Right Half-Space
4 · 33%
Central
4 · 33%
Left Half-Space
1 · 8%
Left Wing
1 · 8%
Vision AI beaten in 7 of 12 tackle duels (58% loss rate) — a real defensive leak worth flagging.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 0 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

03

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

10%
vertical passes
14×
9%
switches
12×
27%
carries
37×
53%
short circulation
72×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW367%233%1RHS1612%244%725%412%26%1C7210%726%1925%1828%2011%8LHS427%35%224%1024%1040%17LW176%124%424%447%8FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right half-space in the defensive third → the right half-space in the middle third — 1 progressive passes (12% of his progression) at 0.059 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

Inward (25%) and outward (25%) progression are balanced — no strong lane bias.

14% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 2 line-breaking passes and 9 final-third entries, 2.2 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%4%6%3%1%1%3%26%21%2%1%1%3%9%14%5%2%
completedincomplete192 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
192
passes
78%
completed
42
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 78% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

15
progressive · 1.8/90
9
final-third entries · 1.1/90
1
box entries · 0.12/90
6
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

1 key passes (0.12/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
100%
chance creation (1)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
05

Where does he become vulnerable?

42 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

2
attacking third (cheap)
32
middle third
8
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 5% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.23 danger-index/90 · 0.437 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
06

What is his passing profile?

192
passes attempted
53%
mostly forward
55%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
101 · 53%
Sideways
63 · 33%
Backward
28 · 15%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
52 · 35%
Medium
82 · 55%
Long (>30m)
16 · 11%
10

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.420.250.140.140.120.12
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.42
Central Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
1 passes · 1 to a shot
0.25
Central Def third → Right Wing Att third
2 passes
0.14
Right Half-Space Def third → Right Half-Space Mid third
1 passes
0.14
Left Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Att third
1 passes
0.12
Left Wing Mid third → Left Half-Space Mid third
1 passes
0.12
Left Wing Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
07

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where John Egan gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
23%
Primary
Central, Defensive third
17%
Secondary
Central, Middle third
15%
Third
Left Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
08

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where John Egan actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
5182693549414251812611
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%4%6%3%1%1%3%26%21%2%1%1%3%9%14%5%2%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

1Key pass
1Cross
15Progressive
30Long ball
13Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
10Outside → Inside
92Inside → Inside
10Outside → Outside
38Inside → Outside
By direction
101Forward
28Backward
63Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
02

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he switches it out from the central to the right hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 passes worth 0.42 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 1 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he switches it out from the central to the right hs, advancing it forward in the middle third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right half-space in the middle third: 47% of his 15 touches there are lost (7 times).
—2 touches · too few11%1/9 lost0%0/44 lost12%3/24 lost—6 touches · too few—7 touches · too few47%7/15 lost19%6/32 lost34%10/29 lost20%3/15 lost—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—4 touches · too few—2 touches · too few—1 touch · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

139 defensive actions across the season (16.9/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
12
tackles · 42% won
8
interceptions · 1.0/90
20
recoveries · 2.4/90
57
clearances · 6.9/90
6
blocks
28
avg action height
8
won high (att 3rd)
41
middle third
90
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 40 proactive ball-wins (4.9/90), tackle success 42%. He defends deep, protecting his box — a last-line stopper.
14

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can John Egan still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-4 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 3.0, 2m)
76%
1.9
5.3
0.51
Mid press (PPDA 3.3, 2m)
80%
1.9
4.7
0.35
Low press (PPDA 4.1, 4m)
78%
1.7
2.2
0.34
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

15

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: John Egan played nearly every Hull City match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

16

His Share of the Team

Of everything Hull City produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through John Egan specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
12%
57 / 486
interceptions
6%
8 / 137
tackles
4%
12 / 330
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

18

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 515 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Stopper centre-back36%Ball-playing centre-back14%
Why Stopper centre-back 36%: a weighted blend of ball-winning 45 (weight 40%) + defensive aggression 50 (weight 35%) + transition 33 (weight 10%) + retention 11 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
passing directness
Strong
—
Average
defensive aggression, ball-winning, build-up, through-balls
Weak
transition, receiving zones, box threat, creativity, retention, crossing, press resistance, territory (wide vs central), dribbling, final-third threat, carrying, line-breaking, progression
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Passing directness
90
Defensive aggression
50
Ball-winning
45
Build-up
43
Through-balls ~proxy
43
Transition ~proxy
33
Receiving zones
23
Box threat
23
Creativity
18
Retention
11
Crossing
11
Press resistance ~proxy
7
Territory (wide vs central)
6
Dribbling
5
Final-third threat
4
Carrying
4
Line-breaking
3
Progression
2
19

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 185 cm / 75 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Domingos Duarte Getafe · La Liga 25/26 · 192 cm / 80 kg
94%
Driven by: press resistance (16%), carrying (11%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Duarte more via crossing.
Facundo Garcés Alaves · La Liga 25/26 · 191 cm / 82 kg
93%
Driven by: press resistance (15%), carrying (11%), progression (10%). Different mechanism — Garcés more via box threat, crossing.
Joe Worrall Burnley 25/26 · 193 cm / 64 kg
90%
Driven by: press resistance (14%), progression (11%), carrying (10%). Different mechanism — Egan more via through-balls, ball-winning; Worrall more via crossing.
Seny Koumbassa Toulouse · Ligue 1 · 194 cm
89%
Driven by: press resistance (12%), dribbling (11%), final-third threat (11%). Different mechanism — Egan more via through-balls, defensive aggression; Koumbassa more via retention, territory (wide vs central).
Abdel Abqar Getafe · La Liga · 188 cm / 80 kg
88%
Driven by: press resistance (14%), carrying (12%), progression (11%). Different mechanism — Egan more via passing directness; Abqar more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking.
Nikola Katic Schalke · Bundesliga · 194 cm / 90 kg
86%
Driven by: press resistance (16%), progression (11%), carrying (11%). Different mechanism — Katic more via box threat, crossing.
20

Summary

John Egan is a stopper centre-back: 78% pass completion, 30 line-breaking passes and 1.8 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 8 matches (741 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a stopper centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is retention — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall stopper centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report