العربيةVision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2025/26

Bernardo Silva

Real Madrid
Half-space creator CM
36% of actions in the half-spaces
central middeep-lying playmakerprogressionbox-to-box
2984
minutes
38 apps
95
progressive passes
2.9/90
88%
pass completion
2304 passes
47
key passes
1.42/90
30
box entries
0.90/90
148
final-3rd entries
4.5/90
55
dribbles
38% won
305
possessions lost
2.61 danger/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Right Wing, Attacking third — mostly in the middle third (51% of his 2304 passes)
88% completion · 2304× in 38/38 matches
↓
PROGRESS
drive or pass into the final third
2.9 prog/90 · 95× in 31/38 matches
↓
ARRIVE
get into the box late
47 key passes · 30× in 19/38 matches
↓
CREATE / FINISH
cut-back or shot from inside
1.42 key passes /90 · 2 goals · 77× in 23/38 matches
Signature: receive → progress → arrive in the box → create or finish. A box-to-box midfielder judged across every phase.
21

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
61
passes / match
2.5
dribbles / match
8–118
pass range (matches)
1–5
dribble range (matches)
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (8 at the low end, 118 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance. Dribble range works the same way, for dribbles/carries per match.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

12

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

688 tracked carries (20.8/90, 180 progressive, 6945m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). this counts every touch-carry, not just his dribble attempts below — a fuller picture of how much of his ball-carrying is control-and-move rather than beating a man.

0%5%10%14%15%3%3%8%10%8%2%0%1%4%6%7%4%1%
progressivelateral/short% of his 688 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 43m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
83Outside → Inside
367Inside → Inside
203Outside → Outside
35Inside → Outside
First (214)Second (196)Third (142)Fourth (136)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Dribbles (1v1s)

Bernardo Silva's signature is the dribble. Does he carry outside (down the right wing) or inside (into the half-space / centre)? Every dribble classified by channel. Season rate: 1.62 dribbles attempted /90.

brighter band = more dribbles · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 51%
OUTSIDE 49%
Dribble location — 28 inside · 27 outside
Right Wing
26 · 47%
Right Half-Space
19 · 35%
Central
8 · 15%
Left Half-Space
1 · 2%
Left Wing
1 · 2%
Vision AI 49% of his dribbles are in the wide right lane — he attacks the full-back on the outside, then threatens to cut inside onto his left foot.
04

How does he build & move the ball?

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW57453%30538%2168%481%40%1RHS40430%12229%11833%1346%251%5C50010%5221%10738%19122%1108%40LHS3312%55%1525%8335%11534%113LW2240%11%25%1141%9253%118FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the final third → the right half-space in the final third — 35 progressive passes (23% of his progression) at 0.073 xT each. He moves it inside.

His progression is inward: 73% of progressive passes move the ball toward the middle versus 2% going wider — he cuts in rather than holding width.

Only 6% of his passes switch play, so his threat is same-side — contain the flank he occupies and the route closes.

Quality behind the volume: 62 line-breaking passes and 148 final-third entries, 8.0 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
1%5%8%11%14%6%1%6%9%9%3%0%1%3%5%8%6%2%
completedincomplete2304 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
2304
passes
88%
completed
271
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 88% season completion rate.
02

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

95
progressive · 2.9/90
148
final-third entries · 4.5/90
30
box entries · 0.90/90
25
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
06

How does he create chances?

47 key passes (1.42/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
5%20%12%5%2%18%5%2%22%8%
chance creation (40)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
16

Can he finish?

30 shots · 2.78 xG · 2 goals (-0.78 vs xG). Mostly left-footed. Circle size = xG.

shots  30
on target  20
goals  2
xG  2.78
xG on target  2.52
xG / shot  0.093
Where he shoots from — click an area of the box
09

Where does he become vulnerable?

305 possessions lost. Directness has a cost — the question is where. Attacking-third losses are cheap; deep ones are dangerous.

141
attacking third (cheap)
112
middle third
52
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 46% of losses are in the attacking third — he gambles where a turnover costs little.
Mistake danger (proxy): 2.61 danger-index/90 · 0.284 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
13

What is his passing profile?

2304
passes attempted
41%
mostly sideways
62%
mostly short
Direction
Forward
715 · 31%
Sideways
949 · 41%
Backward
640 · 28%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
1270 · 62%
Medium
667 · 33%
Long (>30m)
96 · 5%
05

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

1.620.710.610.600.560.53
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
1.62
Right Wing Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
5 passes
0.71
Right Half-Space Att third → Right Half-Space Att third
3 passes
0.61
Right Wing Mid third → Right Half-Space Att third
2 passes
0.60
Central Mid third → Right Wing Att third
7 passes
0.56
Central Att third → Central Att third
2 passes · 2 to a shot
0.53
Left Half-Space Mid third → Left Wing Att third
6 passes
10

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Bernardo Silva gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
15%
Primary
Right Wing, Attacking third
14%
Secondary
Central, Middle third
11%
Third
Right Half-Space, Middle third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
11

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Bernardo Silva actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
28661131911354132141214222893133121194253340145
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

1%5%8%11%14%6%1%6%9%9%3%0%1%3%5%8%6%2%
own goal left, attacking →
14

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

47Key pass
26Cross
14Cutback
95Progressive
151Long ball
72Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
373Outside → Inside
898Inside → Inside
425Outside → Outside
337Inside → Outside
By direction
715Forward
640Backward
949Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays inside from the right wing toward the right hs in the final third — 5 passes worth 1.62 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 47 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the right wing toward the central in the final third — 7 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the left wing in the defensive third: 26% of his 47 touches there are lost (12 times).
20%16/82 lost8%6/76 lost4%6/136 lost10%7/68 lost26%12/47 lost12%29/243 lost8%19/250 lost8%26/334 lost9%21/222 lost7%8/116 lost14%48/342 lost24%32/135 lost9%6/68 lost18%15/84 lost20%20/101 lostRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
07

Does he carry inside or outside — his ball-carries across the pitch

Four arrows, one per movement class of his ball-carries: outside→inside (cutting in with the ball), inside→outside (carrying wide), outside→outside (down the touchline) and inside→inside (through the middle). Each count is measured from the carry's real start and end coordinates.

own goal left, attacking →
Across 688 ball-carries, his dominant tendency is that he carries through central areas (53%). He carries from outside into the middle 83 times and out toward the touchline 35 — a genuine inside forward who cuts in with the ball.
08

What happens right after he carries the ball

Every carry's end point matched against his own very next pass or shot in the same match, when one starts almost exactly there — the direct continuation of that touch, not a separate stat. “No clean link” means no pass or shot of his own started close enough to count (often the carry ended in a tackle or a loss); it isn't a claim about exactly what happened, only that nothing traceable followed.

Shot
5 · 1%
Progressive / key pass
44 · 6%
Simple pass
604 · 88%
No clean link
35 · 5%
Of 688 carries, 1% flow straight into a shot of his own, 6% into a key or progressive pass — a genuine end product to the carry, not just ball retention. 5% have no clean link to a next touch of his own close to where the carry ended.
15

Crosses & Cutbacks

26 crosses (0.78/90, 15 completed) and 14 cutbacks (0.42/90, 4 completed) — two separate wide-delivery patterns into the box, each its own map with a completed/failed filter. Neither is a tagged event, so both are inferred from pass geometry — the intended end point of a failed attempt is still real data (an interception doesn’t erase where the ball was aimed): a cross is a pass aimed into the box starting from a wide channel; a cutback starts almost on the byline but is squared back rather than driven forward, aimed centrally around the box. The completed-cross count was checked against this platform’s own real match-level cross totals and lands within about 1 cross of the true count.

Crosses — close-up on the final third
Cutbacks — close-up on the final third
completedfailed (dashed)close-up on the box — attacking ↑ toward goal
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

17

How & where does he defend?

327 defensive actions across the season (9.9/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
54
tackles · 52% won
22
interceptions · 0.7/90
146
recoveries · 4.4/90
36
clearances · 1.1/90
17
blocks
40
avg action height
42
won high (att 3rd)
153
middle third
132
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 222 proactive ball-wins (6.7/90), tackle success 52%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
18

Against Different Pressing Intensities

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Does Bernardo Silva keep producing when the game is tight and the press is high? Tiers of ~12-14 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
xT /90
prog /90
key P /90
dribble%
High press (PPDA 5.4, 12m)
1.08
3.1
0.93
42%
Mid press (PPDA 7.5, 12m)
1.32
3.2
1.51
20%
Low press (PPDA 11.3, 14m)
1.26
2.3
1.83
42%
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

19

Impact on the Team

Insufficient sample: Bernardo Silva played nearly every Real Madrid match in the loaded data, so there is no meaningful "without him" comparison yet. This section fills in as more matches (and the rest of the season) are scraped.

20

His Share of the Team

Of everything Real Madrid produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Bernardo Silva specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
half-space entries
8%
203 / 2414
tackles
8%
63 / 806
final-third entries
8%
244 / 3174
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

22

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 383 central mids in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Deep-lying playmaker72%Tempo controller71%Advanced playmaker (8)65%Box-to-box runner61%
Why Deep-lying playmaker 72%: a weighted blend of build-up 81 (weight 30%) + progression 72 (weight 30%) + retention 66 (weight 20%) + press resistance 45 (weight 20%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
carrying
Strong
build-up, receiving zones, crossing, progression, final-third threat
Average
retention, line-breaking, through-balls, transition, box threat, ball-winning, territory (wide vs central), creativity, press resistance, defensive aggression
Weak
dribbling, passing directness
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Carrying
86
Build-up
81
Receiving zones
79
Crossing
76
Progression
72
Final-third threat
70
Retention
66
Line-breaking
65
Through-balls ~proxy
63
Transition ~proxy
57
Box threat
57
Ball-winning
56
Territory (wide vs central)
56
Creativity
54
Press resistance ~proxy
45
Defensive aggression
43
Dribbling
36
Passing directness
13
23

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 173 cm / 63 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

João Neves PSG · Ligue 1 · 174 cm / 66 kg
82%
Driven by: build-up (15%), passing directness (13%), crossing (13%). Different mechanism — Neves more via defensive aggression, box threat.
Miguel Gutiérrez Leverkusen · Bundesliga · 180 cm / 73 kg
82%
Driven by: build-up (16%), passing directness (14%), carrying (14%). Different mechanism — Silva more via box threat; Gutiérrez more via territory (wide vs central), line-breaking.
Andrea Cambiaso Juventus · Serie A · 182 cm / 77 kg
77%
Driven by: passing directness (19%), crossing (14%), receiving zones (12%). Different mechanism — Silva more via dribbling; Cambiaso more via ball-winning.
Dominik Szoboszlai Liverpool · Premier League · 186 cm / 74 kg
71%
Driven by: receiving zones (14%), passing directness (13%), carrying (13%). Different mechanism — Silva more via build-up; Szoboszlai more via box threat, final-third threat.
Saša Lukic Fulham · Premier League · 180 cm / 75 kg
70%
Driven by: crossing (19%), carrying (15%), receiving zones (11%). Different mechanism — Silva more via defensive aggression, ball-winning; Lukic more via through-balls, creativity.
Aleix García Leverkusen · Bundesliga · 173 cm / 68 kg
69%
Driven by: build-up (17%), crossing (13%), receiving zones (11%). Different mechanism — Silva more via territory (wide vs central), defensive aggression; García more via passing directness, line-breaking.
24

Summary

Bernardo Silva is a deep-lying playmaker / tempo controller: 2.9 progressive passes, 1.42 key passes /90, 30 box entries, 2 goals from 2.78 xG. A box-to-box contributor across every phase.

Based on 38 matches (2984 minutes) this season — a reliable read. He profiles as a deep-lying playmaker / tempo controller — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is press resistance — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall deep-lying playmaker profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report