العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportPremier League 2026

Joachim Andersen

Fulham
Ball-playing centre-back CB
7.1 progressive passes/90 · 1.3 line-breaking/90
centre-backball-playing centre-backbuild-upline-breaking
202
minutes
3 apps
201
passes
89% completed
89%
pass completion
201 passes
16
progressive passes
7.1/90
23
line-breaking passes
10.2/90
49
defensive actions
21.8/90
4
tackles + interceptions
50% tackle win
15
clearances
6.7/90
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Joachim Andersen has played 3 matches (202 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
in the first line of build-up — mostly in the middle third (52% of his 201 passes)
89% completion · 201× in 3/3 matches
↓
BREAK A LINE
vertical pass past the opponent midfield
7.1 prog/90 · 23× in 3/3 matches
↓
SWITCH PLAY
diagonal to the far side
cross-field balls · 10× in 2/3 matches
↓
PROGRESS
entries into the final third
7.6/90 · 17× in 2/3 matches
Signature: Receive → Break A Line → Switch Play → Progress — the only steps proven repeatable this season (4 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: carry out — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
16

Where is he influential — vs where is he merely present?

Red fill = raw touch territory. Gold rings = zones where his influence (xT added, progression, line-breaks, key passes) outweighs how often he's actually there — one combined map instead of two separate maps to compare by eye. Red with no ring: present but not dangerous. A ring on faint red: rare touches, outsized impact.

own goal left, attacking →
67
passes / match
21.8
def actions / 90
1–112
pass range (matches)
15
clearances
Pass range = his fewest and most passes in any single match this season (1 at the low end, 112 at the high) — a measure of match-to-match involvement, not pass distance.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

08

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

41 tracked carries (18.3/90, 7 progressive, 372m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

5%24%15%2%10%5%7%15%15%2%
progressivelateral/short% of his 41 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 23m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
6Outside → Inside
29Inside → Inside
6Outside → Outside
First (20)Second (12)Third (9)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

2
tackle duels
1
won
1
beaten · 50%
brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
INSIDE 50%
OUTSIDE 50%
Tackle-duel location — 1 inside · 1 outside
Right Wing
1 · 50%
Right Half-Space
1 · 50%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI beaten in 1 of 2 tackle duels (50% loss rate) — a solid 1v1 defensive record.
Every tackle duel, exact location
wonlost — dribbled pastown goal left, attacking →

He attempted only 0 dribbles of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

02

How does he build & move the ball?

How does he escape the first line?

7%
vertical passes
9×
6%
switches
7×
24%
carries
30×
63%
short circulation
80×
Answer: he escapes the press primarily through carrying — stepping out with the ball.

How he moves the ball — his 4 busiest progression routes, not where every pass starts and ends separately. Arrow width = how often, colour = xT gained, dashed = switch of play. The full breakdown is in the lane matrix below.

own goal left, attacking →
Lane transition matrix — when he receives in a lane, where does it go?
TO →RWRHSCLHSLWRW4149%2015%632%135%2RHS9732%316%641%4019%182%2C3321%721%727%924%86%2LHS367%233%1LW450%250%2FROM
Rows normalised: each row sums to 100% of that lane's completed passes. Grey number = passes from that lane.

Primary route: the right wing in the middle third → the right wing in the final third — 2 progressive passes (22% of his progression) at 0.157 xT each. He keeps it in the same lane.

Inward (22%) and outward (22%) progression are balanced — no strong lane bias.

16% of his passes are cross-field switches — he changes the point of attack often.

Quality behind the volume: 3 line-breaking passes and 17 final-third entries, 2.3 total xT added.

Origin and destination are measured on the same event row — no receiver inference. Receiver identity is not recoverable from this data source.
All passes — origin zone share
Filter: from to
10%20%15%16%4%0%2%8%10%8%1%1%0%0%0%1%
completedincomplete201 passes · any zone → any zone · own goal left, attacking →
201
passes
89%
completed
23
lost
Vision AIIn line with his 89% season completion rate.
04

How does he progress play?

How much he drives the ball forward. Progressive = completed pass advancing ≥15 toward goal.

16
progressive · 7.1/90
17
final-third entries · 7.6/90
0
box entries · 0.00/90
24
progression index /90
Progression index: one composite number — progressive passes + progressive carries + 2% of total distance progressed + 8× positive xT added, all per 90. Weights VOLUME and THREAT together rather than counting progressive actions alone.
12

How does he create chances?

3 key passes (1.34/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
33%67%
chance creation (3)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
09

Where does he become vulnerable?

23 times he gave the ball away. For a defender the danger is where — a loss in his own third can turn into a chance against; higher up it costs little.

4
attacking third (cheap)
13
middle third
6
own third (dangerous)
Vision AI 17% of losses are in the attacking third — a notable share happen deeper, which invites transitions.
Mistake danger (proxy): 4.67 danger-index/90 · 0.456 avg/turnover. Weights each loss by threat conceded at that location. True xT-conceded needs the opponent possession model; positional proxy.
05

What is his passing profile?

201
passes attempted
45%
mostly forward
58%
mostly medium
Direction
Forward
91 · 45%
Sideways
71 · 35%
Backward
39 · 19%
Length (completed)
Short (<15m)
61 · 34%
Medium
103 · 58%
Long (>30m)
14 · 8%
10

Preferred Progression Routes — xT-weighted

His progressive passes as zone→zone routes, weighted by expected threat (xT) added — arrow width and the number are the total xT generated on each route, not just how often he plays it. This is where he actually moves the needle.

0.310.300.290.240.200.18
own goal left, attacking →
Highest-value routes (xT)
0.31
Right Wing Mid third → Right Wing Att third
2 passes
0.30
Right Wing Mid third → Central Att third
1 passes
0.29
Right Wing Def third → Right Wing Att third
1 passes
0.24
Right Half-Space Def third → Right Wing Att third
1 passes
0.20
Right Half-Space Mid third → Left Half-Space Att third
1 passes
0.18
Right Half-Space Mid third → Right Wing Att third
3 passes
06

Where Does He Receive?

The zones where Joachim Andersen gets on the ball — his top three ball-collection areas highlighted (gold = primary). Reception is proxied by where his on-ball actions begin (no explicit receiver is recorded).

123
1 = primary, 2 = secondary, 3 = third · own goal left, attacking →
His collection zones
29%
Primary
Right Half-Space, Middle third
19%
Secondary
Right Half-Space, Defensive third
13%
Third
Right Wing, Defensive third
These are the zones where he collected the ball most.
07

Where Does He Operate? — Every Zone

Every on-ball touch (pass, dribble, shot) binned into a 6×3 grid — raw counts of where Joachim Andersen actually gets on the ball. Hover any zone for its breakdown by action type, its share of all touches, and the exact coordinate range it covers.

Filter:
21112517211622140313281
own goal left, attacking → · brighter + higher number = more touches

Passes only — completed vs incomplete, by zone

Same zone grid, restricted to passes so completed/incomplete and match filters actually mean something — a shot or a dribble has no "completed" in the pass sense.

10%20%15%16%4%0%2%8%10%8%1%1%0%0%0%1%
own goal left, attacking →
11

Every Pass This Season — completed vs incomplete

Every pass this season, plotted individually — green = completed, grey (dashed) = incomplete, gold = key pass. Filter by outcome or isolate one match below.

3Key pass
2Cutback
16Progressive
23Long ball
10Switch
By zone — where the pass started → where it landed
23Outside → Inside
91Inside → Inside
22Outside → Outside
42Inside → Outside
By direction
91Forward
39Backward
71Sideways
own goal left, attacking →
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
How does he progress the ball forward?
His most common route for progressing play: he plays straight through the right wing, advancing it forward in the middle third — 2 passes worth 0.31 xT.
Where do his chances come from?
Of 3 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays inside from the left hs toward the central in the final third — 2 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the central in the middle third: 28% of his 25 touches there are lost (7 times).
19%5/26 lost0%0/39 lost6%1/16 lost—0 touches · too few—3 touches · too few16%3/19 lost5%3/58 lost28%7/25 lost—1 touch · too few—1 touch · too few—4 touches · too few—6 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—2 touches · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

13

How & where does he defend?

49 defensive actions across the season (21.8/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
2
tackles · 50% won
2
interceptions · 0.9/90
9
recoveries · 4.0/90
15
clearances · 6.7/90
4
blocks
31
avg action height
1
won high (att 3rd)
24
middle third
24
own third
Vision AI A deep-defending defender. He wins the ball mainly by clearing and blocking — a reactive, protect-the-box profile. 13 proactive ball-wins (5.8/90), tackle success 50%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

14

Impact on the Team

Fulham's output per match with Joachim Andersen (3 matches) versus without him (5 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 5 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (3)
WITHOUT (5)
Δ
goals against /match
1.67
1.00
+0.67
points /match
0.33
1.40
-1.07
goals for /match
1.00
1.00
+0.00
xG for /match
1.84
0.78
+1.07
15

His Share of the Team

Of everything Fulham produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Joachim Andersen specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
clearances
18%
246 / 1330
final-third entries
11%
220 / 1962
threat added by passing (xT)
11%
54.2 / 507.2
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

17

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 515 centre-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Ball-playing centre-back78%Stopper centre-back48%
Why Ball-playing centre-back 78%: a weighted blend of progression 88 (weight 25%) + build-up 73 (weight 30%) + retention 61 (weight 30%) + press resistance 66 (weight 15%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
progression
Strong
carrying, final-third threat, line-breaking, transition, passing directness, build-up, through-balls
Average
creativity, press resistance, dribbling, receiving zones, retention, crossing, ball-winning, box threat
Weak
defensive aggression, territory (wide vs central)
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Progression
88
Carrying
84
Final-third threat
84
Line-breaking
82
Transition ~proxy
75
Passing directness
73
Build-up
73
Through-balls ~proxy
70
Creativity
69
Press resistance ~proxy
66
Dribbling
65
Receiving zones
61
Retention
61
Crossing
61
Ball-winning
51
Box threat
44
Defensive aggression
35
Territory (wide vs central)
19
18

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 192 cm / 86 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Moussa Niakhaté Lyon · Ligue 1 · 190 cm / 82 kg
91%
Driven by: progression (15%), transition (15%), final-third threat (12%).
Clément Lenglet Atletico · La Liga 25/26 · 186 cm / 81 kg
90%
Driven by: progression (17%), carrying (15%), transition (14%). Different mechanism — Lenglet more via territory (wide vs central).
Lisandro Martínez Man Utd · 175 cm / 78 kg
87%
Driven by: progression (13%), carrying (12%), transition (11%). Different mechanism — Andersen more via defensive aggression; Martínez more via receiving zones, dribbling.
Aïssa Mandi Levante · La Liga · 186 cm / 81 kg
86%
Driven by: progression (18%), transition (13%), carrying (13%). Different mechanism — Mandi more via retention.
Mario Gila AC Milan · Serie A · 185 cm / 74 kg
86%
Driven by: transition (15%), progression (15%), carrying (13%). Different mechanism — Gila more via receiving zones, territory (wide vs central).
Jhon Lucumí Juventus · Serie A · 187 cm / 84 kg
83%
Driven by: progression (15%), transition (13%), carrying (11%). Different mechanism — Andersen more via passing directness, crossing; Lucumí more via receiving zones, ball-winning.
19

Summary

Joachim Andersen is a ball-playing centre-back: 89% pass completion, 23 line-breaking passes and 7.1 progressive passes /90. A build-and-progress centre-back whose value is in beating the first line with the pass, not in raw defensive volume. [Aerial duels, marking, line-height and 1v1 recovery need aerial-event + tracking data, absent here.]

Based on 3 matches (202 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as a ball-playing centre-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is retention — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall ball-playing centre-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report