Thin sample this season. Ali Abdi has played 3 matches (65 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01
What Patterns Define Him?
His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.
RECEIVE
Left Wing, Middle third — wide or inverted — mostly in the middle third (62% of his 26 passes)
69% completion · 26× in 3/3 matches
↓
DEFEND
1v1 and cover on his side
16 def actions · lost 55% deep · 16× in 3/3 matches
Signature: Receive → Defend — the only steps proven repeatable this season (2 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: progress — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); dribble — 1× (low confidence, shown as a number only, no tactical conclusion drawn); deliver — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
16 defensive actions across the season (22.2/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.
click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
3
tackles · 33% won
1
interceptions · 1.4/90
3
recoveries · 4.2/90
1
clearances · 1.4/90
1
blocks
45
avg action height
4
won high (att 3rd)
4
middle third
8
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 7 proactive ball-wins (9.7/90), tackle success 33%. He defends high, stepping out to intercept — suits a high line.
Team
Team context
How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.
Nice's output per match with Ali Abdi (3 matches) versus without him (5 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 5 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.
WITH (3)
WITHOUT (5)
Δ
goals against /match
1.00
1.40
-0.40
points /match
1.33
1.40
-0.07
goals for /match
1.00
1.00
+0.00
xG for /match
0.82
0.00
+0.82
04
His Share of the Team
Of everything Nice produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Ali Abdi specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.
category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
9%
19 / 204
clearances
5%
33 / 618
tackles
5%
25 / 484
Recruitment
Style and verdict
Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.
Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 232 full-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.
Overlapping full-back32%Inverted full-back19%
Why Overlapping full-back 32%: a weighted blend of dribbling 80 (weight 20%) + transition 42 (weight 25%) + crossing 27 (weight 30%) + final-third threat 18 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Dribbling
80
Box threat
79
Defensive aggression
67
Passing directness
63
Receiving zones
55
Press resistance ~proxy
53
Territory (wide vs central)
53
Creativity
53
Transition ~proxy
42
Ball-winning
37
Through-balls ~proxy
33
Carrying
31
Crossing
27
Build-up
24
Retention
24
Line-breaking
18
Final-third threat
18
Progression
17
06
Similar Players — in style space
Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 177 cm / 78 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style.Scope: pooled across the Ligue 1, Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.
Style, not quality:a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.
Sebastián Boselli Getafe · La Liga · 183 cm / 80 kg
71%
Driven by: progression (17%), final-third threat (13%), build-up (12%). Different mechanism — Abdi more via territory (wide vs central), receiving zones; Boselli more via passing directness, defensive aggression.
Davinchi Getafe · La Liga · 182 cm / 73 kg
68%
Driven by: build-up (16%), dribbling (12%), retention (11%). Different mechanism — Abdi more via box threat, receiving zones; Davinchi more via territory (wide vs central), passing directness.
Lewie Coyle Hull City · Premier League · 173 cm / 67 kg
65%
Driven by: crossing (17%), progression (16%), final-third threat (15%). Different mechanism — Abdi more via box threat, dribbling; Coyle more via territory (wide vs central).
Sebastian Sebulonsen Koln · Bundesliga · 187 cm / 78 kg
61%
Driven by: build-up (16%), progression (15%), final-third threat (14%). Different mechanism — Abdi more via territory (wide vs central), receiving zones; Sebulonsen more via carrying, through-balls.
Jacques Ekomié Angers · 179 cm / 74 kg
59%
Driven by: final-third threat (20%), progression (16%), build-up (13%). Different mechanism — Abdi more via receiving zones, box threat; Ekomié more via ball-winning, territory (wide vs central).
Simone Cinquegrano Sassuolo · Serie A · 192 cm
59%
Driven by: progression (16%), crossing (15%), build-up (12%). Different mechanism — Abdi more via passing directness, defensive aggression; Cinquegrano more via territory (wide vs central), retention.
07
Summary
Ali Abdi is an overlapping full-back: 1.4 progressive passes and 0 box entries, delivering 0 key passes. Inverted full-back. [1v1 recovery pace and off-ball overlap timing need tracking.]
Based on 3 matches (65 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an overlapping full-back — best used in a system built around that identity.
His biggest room for growth is final-third threat — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall overlapping full-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive
Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.
← BACK TO SEARCH
