العربيةSeason2025/262026 · this seasonAll seasons
Building the full report
Combining every season — this one is larger, give it a moment.
Vision AI ← BACK TO SEARCH
Player reportSerie A 2026

Manuel Lazzari

Lazio
Overlapping full-back FB
pushes high (x=52) · 0.0 crosses/90
full-backinverted full-backprogressioncrossing
111
minutes
6 apps
89%
pass completion
46 passes
5
progressive passes
4.1/90
4
final-3rd entries
3.2/90
0
box entries
0.00/90
16
defensive actions
13.0/90
2
tackles + interceptions
0% tackle win
1
dribbles
100% won
Overview

The player

Who he is and how he compares with his peers.

Thin sample this season. Manuel Lazzari has played 6 matches (111 min) so far, so sections that need a bigger sample to say anything reliable are not shown here — they are missing on purpose, not broken. See all seasons combined →
01

What Patterns Define Him?

His repeatable signature. A step only appears if its reliability score (sample size × match coverage) reaches at least Medium confidence — pattern mining, not anecdotes.

RECEIVE
Right Wing, Attacking third — wide or inverted — mostly in the attacking third (41% of his 46 passes)
89% completion · 46× in 6/6 matches
↓
PROGRESS
carry or combine up the flank
4.1 prog/90 · 5× in 4/6 matches
↓
DEFEND
1v1 and cover on his side
16 def actions · lost 0% deep · 16× in 6/6 matches
Signature: Receive → Progress → Defend — the only steps proven repeatable this season (3 of 5 in the full pattern). Not enough evidence yet for the rest of the chain below.
Not a pattern: dribble — 1× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet); deliver — 0× (insufficient confidence, hidden — not enough evidence yet) — omitted from the signature rather than presented as one.
In possession

In possession

What he does with the ball: build-up, progression, creation, carrying and finishing.

04

How dangerous are his carries?

Real ball-carries

19 tracked carries (15.4/90, 6 progressive, 188m total) — the ball moving with his touches, a different signal from dribbles below (beating an opponent 1v1). even a player who rarely dribbles past a man can still carry the ball forward constantly in build-up; this is that.

11%53%32%5%
progressivelateral/short% of his 19 carries originating in each zone · own goal left, attacking →
Every carry, exact path — median 8m, longest 29m
By zone — where the carry started → where it ended
4Outside → Inside
6Inside → Inside
8Outside → Outside
1Inside → Outside
First (19)grouped by carry pattern (start + end position), largest group first
startendown goal left, attacking →

Beaten in the tackle

How often an attacker gets past him in a 1v1 defensive duel — the closest signal the data has to "dribbled past" (no attacker-beat-defender field exists directly, so this counts tackles he attempted and lost).

brighter band = more tackle duels · own goal left, attacking →
Right Wing
0 · 0%
Right Half-Space
0 · 0%
Central
0 · 0%
Left Half-Space
0 · 0%
Left Wing
0 · 0%
Vision AI too few tackle duels this season to read a pattern.

He attempted only 1 dribble of his own all season — dribbling is not part of this role; his ball-carrying is covered above, his defending against the dribble below.

02

How does he create chances?

2 key passes (1.62/90), 0 of them assists — where his chance creation specifically comes from, 18 zones (6×3), showing his share of key passes originating there.

Chance creation — key pass origin zone share
Filter:
50%50%
chance creation (2)assist (0)% of the selected group's key passes originating in each zone
03

Tactical patterns — how his football actually looks

Three clustered sequence diagrams from his own event data — his three busiest routes: the way he progresses, the pattern behind his chances, and where a turnover turns dangerous.

own goal left, attacking →
Where do his chances come from?
Of 2 key passes, his busiest route is a delivery where he plays straight through the right wing in the final third — 1 times. The receiver isn't identifiable in this data, only where the pass started and ended.
Where does he lose the ball most?
This is a RATE, not a raw count — the share of his touches in each zone that end in a turnover, so a zone he simply plays in more often doesn't automatically look riskier. His weakest zone is the right wing in the final third: 15% of his 13 touches there are lost (2 times).
—7 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few0%0/9 lost0%0/9 lost—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—0 touches · too few15%2/13 lost—5 touches · too few—0 touches · too few—1 touch · too few—0 touches · too fewRWRHSCLHSLWDEFMIDATT
Out of possession

Out of possession

Where and how he defends and presses.

06

How & where does he defend?

16 defensive actions across the season (13.0/90). Where he wins the ball, and how — the core question for a defender. Aerial duels are not recorded for this competition, so aerial dominance is not measured here.

click a card to isolate that action type · own goal left, attacking →
0
tackles · 0% won
2
interceptions · 1.6/90
6
recoveries · 4.9/90
2
clearances · 1.6/90
0
blocks
39
avg action height
2
won high (att 3rd)
6
middle third
8
own third
Vision AI A mid-block defender. He wins the ball mainly by stepping in — tackles, interceptions & recoveries outweigh clearances. 8 proactive ball-wins (6.5/90), tackle success 0%. He defends mostly around the middle third.
05

Can he play under pressure?

Split by how hard the opponent pressed (opponent PPDA — lower = more intense press). Can Manuel Lazzari still play out when the opponent presses high? His build-up quality split by press intensity — the key question for a ball-playing defender. Tiers of ~2-2 matches — directional evidence, not proof.

press tier
completion
prog /90
line-breaks /90
xT /90
High press (PPDA 4.4, 2m)
75%
5.5
2.7
0.66
Mid press (PPDA 5.4, 2m)
88%
5.6
2.8
1.37
Low press (PPDA 10.4, 2m)
95%
2.0
2.0
0.42
Team

Team context

How much of the team runs through him, and what changes without him.

07

Impact on the Team

Lazio's output per match with Manuel Lazzari (6 matches) versus without him (3 matches). Insufficient evidence — the without-sample is only 3 matches; treat every Δ below as noise until more games exist. What his own defending should move — goals conceded and results — leads; attacking output (largely out of a defender's hands) is shown after, for context. A proper on-off model needs many more minutes.

WITH (6)
WITHOUT (3)
Δ
goals against /match
0.83
0.67
+0.17
points /match
2.67
3.00
-0.33
goals for /match
2.67
2.00
+0.67
xG for /match
1.57
1.25
+0.33
08

His Share of the Team

Of everything Lazio produced this season, the categories where the biggest share ran through Manuel Lazzari specifically — his share of the team total, not a per-90 rate.

category
share
him / team
successful take-ons
4%
11 / 295
final-third entries
3%
64 / 1953
expected assists (xA)
3%
1.2 / 38.7
Recruitment

Style and verdict

Style profile, closest comparables, and the summary.

09

Playing-Style Profile

Not raw event counts — football style scores: weighted models scored 0–100 against the 232 full-backs in the pool (min 450 min). This is what separates players who post similar numbers but play differently. Proxy dimensions are inferred from on-ball data; true off-ball running / under-pressure context is not measured.

Inverted full-back51%Overlapping full-back35%
Why Inverted full-back 51%: a weighted blend of retention 70 (weight 30%) + build-up 50 (weight 35%) + press resistance 70 (weight 10%) + progression 25 (weight 25%). The score reflects how distinctively his profile SHAPE matches this archetype vs his peers.
Elite
carrying
Strong
dribbling, press resistance
Average
retention, territory (wide vs central), transition, build-up, creativity
Weak
passing directness, final-third threat, progression, ball-winning, defensive aggression, receiving zones, box threat, crossing, through-balls, line-breaking
Unknown
aerial ability, marking, off-ball running — not in event data
Carrying
90
Dribbling
76
Press resistance ~proxy
70
Retention
70
Territory (wide vs central)
66
Transition ~proxy
61
Build-up
50
Creativity
41
Passing directness
28
Final-third threat
27
Progression
25
Ball-winning
24
Defensive aggression
23
Receiving zones
16
Box threat
15
Crossing
14
Through-balls ~proxy
6
Line-breaking
3
10

Similar Players — in style space

Closest comparables measured on the style scores above, within the same position family — so it separates how players are alike, not just how much they touch the ball. Each line explains the shared strength and the divergent mechanism. A light physical-profile term (height / weight; this player: 174 cm / 67 kg) is included at a quarter of one style axis's weight — enough to break ties between stylistic twins, not to override style. Scope: pooled across the Serie A, Bundesliga, La Liga, Ligue 1 and Premier League, percentiled within each player's own league before comparing — a match from another league is marked with its league name.

Style, not quality: a high match here means two players tend to produce the ball in similar ways — it is not a ranking, a scouting recommendation, or a claim that they are equally good.

Jordy Makengo Freiburg · Bundesliga · 191 cm / 81 kg
82%
Driven by: box threat (14%), line-breaking (13%), defensive aggression (10%). Different mechanism — Lazzari more via territory (wide vs central), carrying; Makengo more via crossing.
Fodé Ballo-Touré Metz · Ligue 1 25/26 · 182 cm / 70 kg
77%
Driven by: crossing (12%), line-breaking (11%), receiving zones (10%). Different mechanism — Lazzari more via transition, carrying; Ballo-Touré more via box threat, retention.
Rico Henry Brentford · Premier League · 170 cm / 67 kg
77%
Driven by: crossing (19%), line-breaking (11%), defensive aggression (9%). Different mechanism — Lazzari more via carrying, retention; Henry more via through-balls, passing directness.
Nhoa Sangui Paris FC · Ligue 1 25/26 · 178 cm / 67 kg
73%
Driven by: defensive aggression (19%), box threat (15%), through-balls (10%). Different mechanism — Lazzari more via carrying, dribbling; Sangui more via crossing, line-breaking.
Milos Kerkez Liverpool · Premier League · 180 cm / 71 kg
70%
Driven by: crossing (25%), through-balls (13%), ball-winning (12%). Different mechanism — Lazzari more via carrying, dribbling; Kerkez more via receiving zones, box threat.
José Salinas Malaga · La Liga · 179 cm / 69 kg
68%
Driven by: crossing (18%), line-breaking (13%), through-balls (12%). Different mechanism — Lazzari more via territory (wide vs central), carrying; Salinas more via defensive aggression, box threat.
11

Summary

Manuel Lazzari is an inverted full-back: 4.1 progressive passes and 0 box entries, delivering 2 key passes. Inverted full-back. [1v1 recovery pace and off-ball overlap timing need tracking.]

Based on 6 matches (111 minutes) — an early read, treat with caution until more minutes are logged. He profiles as an inverted full-back — best used in a system built around that identity. His biggest room for growth is progression — even a modest improvement there would meaningfully lift his overall inverted full-back profile.
✨ This report is interactive

Click any stat card to filter its map, hover a dot for the exact match, and use the dropdowns to slice passes zone-to-zone. Nothing here is static.

Vision AI · building report